Next Article in Journal
Mitochondrial Phylogenomics of Tenthredinidae (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinoidea) Supports the Monophyly of Megabelesesinae as a Subfamily
Next Article in Special Issue
Remarkable Species Diversity of the Leafhopper Genus Xestocephalus (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Aphrodinae) in Thailand
Previous Article in Journal
Warm Temperatures Reduce Flower Attractiveness and Bumblebee Foraging
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Species Diversity in the Leafhopper Genus Batracomorphus Lewis (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Iassinae) from Qinling Mountain in Shaanxi

Key Laboratory of Plant Protection Resources and Pest Integrated Management of the Ministry of Education, College of Plant Protection, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang 712100, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2021, 12(6), 494; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12060494
Submission received: 12 April 2021 / Revised: 20 May 2021 / Accepted: 20 May 2021 / Published: 26 May 2021

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Qinling Mountain is one of the global biodiversity hotspots, dividing northern temperate zones from subtropical zones. However, no species of Batracomorphus was previously recorded from Qinling Mountain in Shaanxi. We collected some specimens of Batracomorphus from this site and classified these into nine species based on a comparative morphological study, including one new species and one new synonym. The results of this study revealed species diversity and distributions of Batracomorphus.

Abstract

The genus Batracomorphus Lewis is the third largest leafhopper genus in the world, with its greatest diversity in the Oriental region. Here, nine species of Batracomorphus, including one new species, are recorded from Shaanxi Province, China, for the first time: B. allionii (Turton), B. clavatus Cai and Shen, B. fletcheri Hu and Dai sp. nov., B. geminatus (Li and Wang), B. juno Knight, B. lateprocessus Li and Wang, B. lunatus Cai and He, B. subfuscus (Li and Wang) and B. pandarus Knight. Among them, B. juno Knight is recorded from China for the first time. One new synonym is revealed: B. nigromarginattus Cai and Shen, 1999 is a junior synonym of B. subfuscus (Li and Wang, 1993). All taxa are described, and photographs of male genitalia are given based on observations of specimens from Qinling Mountain in Shaanxi of China. A key to the species found in Qinling Mountain of Shaanxi is also provided.

1. Introduction

The Cicadellidae is the largest family in the Hemiptera with more than 23,000 described species distributed worldwide. Iassinae is one of 25 subfamilies of leafhoppers and comprises more than 2000 species and 154 genera currently placed in twelve tribes [1,2,3,4,5]. Iassines are mostly arboreal and are distributed worldwide, but most of the tribes and genera are restricted to a single biogeographic realm.
The widespread Old-World genus Batracomorphus, originally established by Lewis (1834) [6], is the third largest leafhopper genus in the world and contains ca. 360 species, distributed throughout the temperate and tropical regions of the Eastern Hemisphere. Species of Batracomorphus are mainly arboreal, although some also occur on shrubs, herbaceous plants, and grasses [7,8]. Some species of this group cause injury to economically important trees, such as willow, apples, pears, and other fruit trees, as well as to alfalfa, rice and other crops [9]. In China, Batracomorphus allionii damages economic trees [10] and feeds on bamboo [11], and B. pandarus injures wine grapes [11]. Elsewhere, Batracomorphus angustatus (Osborn) is a vector of the phytoplasmas which cause tomato big bud and potato purple top wilt disease [12]. Batracomorphus angustatus is a possible vector of Australian grapevine yellows [13].
Reviews of the species of Batracomorphus from the Afrotropical region [14,15], Oriental region [8,16], and Australian region [8] have revealed the high diversity of the genus and provide distributional data for regional faunas, but more comprehensive studies are still needed to elucidate the degree of overlap among regional faunas.
China is one of the world’s most biodiverse countries, hosting more than ten percent of known species [17], including a considerable number of endemic species. Until now, 36 species of Batracomorphus have been described or recorded in China, many of which are apparently endemics [18,19,20,21]. Shaanxi is a north-central province of China, and includes portions of the Loess Plateau in the middle reaches of the Yellow River, as well as the Qinling Mountain across the southern part of the province. The latter is one of the global biodiversity hotspots, dividing northern temperate zones from subtropical zones. Due to the diverse climate and geographic conditions, hundreds of new insect taxa, including some new genera, have been described from Shaanxi in recent years [22,23,24,25,26]. However, the diversity of Batracomorphus has never been studied thoroughly and no species of Batracomorphus was previously recorded from Qinling Mountain in Shaanxi.
During our ongoing review of Chinese Iassinae, we discovered many specimens of Batracomorphus from Qinling Mountain in Shaanxi. In this paper, we review the known species of Batracomorphus from Shaanxi and describe one new species, B. fletcheri sp. nov. Moreover, the previously known species (B. allionii (Turton), B. clavatus Cai and Shen, B. geminatus (Li and Wang), B. juno Knight, B. lateprocessus Li and Wang, B. lunatus Cai and He, B. subfuscus (Li and Wang) and B. pandarus Knight) are redescribed because their original descriptions were very brief. A checklist of the nine species from Shaanxi is provided together with a key for their separation.

2. Materials and Methods

Specimens examined were collected using sweep nets and light traps. In the present study, 69 specimens of the genus Batracomorphus were collected from Qinling Mountain in Shaanxi and other materials were collected from several provinces in China, as shown in the following section. All specimens, including type specimens, were deposited in the Entomological Museum of Northwest A&F University (NWAFU), Yangling, Shaanxi, China.
The identification of specimens was based mainly on morphological comparisons of male genitalia. Abdomens were removed from all male specimens and boiled for about ten minutes or soaked in 5~10% NaOH for 24 h, to dissolve the muscle. They were then washed in distilled water and transferred to glycerin for further dissection and observation. Female specimen identification was based on comparisons of the morphological features of conspecific male specimens that were obtained at or near the same collection site. Specimen micrographs were taken using OLYMPUS PM-10AD (Olympus Co. LTD, Tokyo, Japan) and Nikon AFX-II stereomicroscopes (Nikon Imaging Japan Inc., Tokyo, Japan) with a Q Imaging digital camera (QImaging, Surrey, BC, Canada), captured in Q-Capture Pro 7 (QImaging, Surrey, BC, Canada) and compiled in Auto-Montage Pro (Synoptics Ltd., Cambridge, UK). After observation, the dissected genitalia were stored in a micro vial containing fresh glycerol. The resulting images were compiled and prepared as plates, using Adobe Photoshop CS2 (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Generic Character

Batracomorphus Lewis
Batracomorphus Lewis, 1834: 51 [6]. Type species: Batracomorphus irroratus Lewis, 1834: 52 [6].
Acojassus Evans, 1972: 656 [16]. Type species: Acojassus montanus Evans, 1972 [16].
Medium-sized (4–8 mm) leafhoppers with overall usually pale green (fading to yellow in dry specimens), rarely with brown markings. Head slightly narrower (rarely equal to or wider) than pronotum. Vertex in dorsal aspect short, transversely striate; length uniform, rarely slightly longer medially; anterior margin broadly rounded in dorsal aspect; in lateral aspect slightly declivous in line with pronotum, continuously curved to face or with dorsal area flattened. Face short, broad; maxillary plates wide, lateral margins sinuate. Lora widely separated from margin. Frontoclypeus broad, approximately circular in outline, laterofrontal sutures terminating just above antennal ledges. Clypellus distinct, short, broad, sides parallel. Antennae near ventral margin of eyes. Antennal ledges prominent, transverse or slightly oblique, extending onto frontoclypeus. Antennal pits deep. Ocelli distinct, near anterior margin of face, each approximately midway between midline and corresponding eye. Pronotum longer than vertex, slightly declivous anteriorly, increasing in width posteriorly, rarely parallel-sided; lateral margins long, strongly carinate; posterior margin shallowly concave; transversely striate. Scutellum long. Forewings long, exceeding abdomen, semi-coriaceous with appendix and first apical cell membranous, weakly punctate, rarely with small tubercles; appendix wide; vein separating appendix and first apical cell complete throughout its length; three subapical cells, closed basally. Setal formula of hind femur III: 2:1:1.
Male genitalia with pygophore longer than height, emarginate dorsally to near mi-length; lateral lobes broadly or narrowly rounded posteriorly, short spine-like setae scattered over posterior half; elongate, arched, posteriorly directed process arising near base of ventral margin, rarely absent. Tenth segment membranous. Valve small, fused to pygophore. Sub-genital plates slender, triangular, extending to apex of pygophore, with short basal stem, the latter sometimes small or obscure; long hair-like setae usually arranged as a dorsolateral group at base, a short uniseriate row on dorsolateral margin and a multiseriate row on ventral margin extending also over medial surface of plate, the dorsolateral or ventral rows sometimes absent, plates sometimes densely setose. Eighth sternite longer than preceding ones and covering basal half of genital capsule. Style with apical process elongate, terminating in a small dorsally directed hook, a ventral subapical expansion sometimes present; lateral lobe well-developed; basal arm very short. Connective Y-shaped with anterior arms linked to each other dorsally and ventrally by plate-like extensions; articulated to aedeagus. Aedeagus simple, shaft directed dorsally, with or without process; gonopore usually long and extending over distal half of posterior margin of shaft, sometimes short; a longitudinal incision on anterior margin of shaft approximately same length as gonopore usually present.
Distribution. Batracomorphus occurs in all geographical regions, with the exception of the New World.
Notes. The genus Batracomorphus, established with Batracomorphus irroratus Lewis as the type species, is distributed throughout the temperate and tropical regions of the Eastern Hemisphere. Recently, Batracomorphus was placed in the monobasic tribe Batracomorphini. This tribe was placed as sister to Hyalojassini with strong branch support based on phylogenetic analysis, combining morphological and molecular data from multiple gene regions [5]. In that study, the newly established tribe was defined mainly on external characters: small to medium-sized, pale green or stramineous leafhoppers; head rounded in profile, without distinctly delimited crown; forewing appendix well-developed but not extended around wing apex; hindwing veins R4 + 5 and M1 + 2 completely confluent distally; male pygofer with stout setae scattered over distal half, ventral process slender, elongate, apex not falcate; sub-genital plate not completely concealed by pregenital sternite, extended nearly as far posterad as pygofer apex; female first valvulae with dorsal sculpturing strigate; second valvulae with two to three widely spaced dorsal teeth.
In external morphology, most species of Batracomorphus are remarkably uniform, differing only slightly in overall size and proportions. Thus, they are difficult to identify without studying the male genitalia. A comparative study of the male genitalia of available specimens revealed considerable variation in several structures, including pygophore processes, style and aedeagus, and such variation has supported separation of most of the known species. These structures were used previously to elucidate the natural relationships of the species in the Oriental and Australian regions and were divided into five informal groups [8]. All features listed above may need to be taken into consideration for accurate classification, and other evidence may be needed to further confirm species limits.
Batracomorphus Lewis appears to be of relatively recent origin with a broad ancestral range, arising between middle Eocene and late Miocene [5,14]. Now, it is one of largest genera in Cicadellidae with over 360 species, and predominantly occurs in the Oriental region [8]. Its major diversification has taken place in the tropics, where 121 species have been described from the Afrotropical region [14]. Recently, a number of additional species have subsequently been added to this genus. More general investigations and more taxonomic sampling are needed to reveal the biodiversity from constituent areas in the Oriental region.

3.2. Overview of Species Identification, Distribution

Nine species of the leafhopper genus Batracomorphus from Qinling, Shaanxi are recorded based on comparative morphological study, including one new species and one new synonym as shown in the following section. (Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7, Figure 8, Figure 9, Figure 10, Figure 11, Figure 12 and Figure 13).

3.2.1. Checklist of the Species of Batracomorphus from China

    • Batracomorphus allionii (Turton) China (Heilongjiang, Jilin, Liaoning, Inner Mongolia, Shaanxi, Zhejiang, Henan, Hubei, Anhui, Shandong, Yunnan, Guizhou, Sichuan), Austria, Azerbaijan, Belgium, Czech, Slovakia, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Kazakhstan, Latvia, Lithuania, Mongolia, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Romania, Russia, Spain, United Kingdom, Ukraine.
    • Batracomorphus chlorophana (Melichar) China (Guizhou, Taiwan, Hubei), Africa, Borneo, Burma, India, Java, Marquesas Islands, Philippines, Samoa, Sri Lanka, West Malaysia.
    • Batracomorphus clavatus Shen and Cai China (Shaanxi, Henan).
    • Batracomorphus cornutus Li China (Hainan).
    • Batracomorphus dentestyleus Li China (Yunnan).
    • Batracomorphus expansus (Li and Wang) China (Guizhou).
    • Batracomorphus extentus Cai and He China (Zhejiang).
    • Batracomorphus fletcheri Hu and Dai sp. nov. China (Shaanxi, Zhejiang).
    • Batracomorphus furcatus Li China (Yunnan, Guizhou).
    • Batracomorphus fuscomaculatus (Kuoh) China (Yunnan, Guizhou).
    • Batracomorphus geminatus (Li and Wang) China (Shaanxi, Guizhou, Hainan).
    • Batracomorphus gracilidensus Li China (Hainan).
    • Batracomorphus gracilis Li China (Xinjiang).
    • Batracomorphus guzhangensis Li China (Hunan).
    • Batracomorphus imitans Jacobi China (Fujian).
    • Batracomorphus inachus Knight China (Henan), Philippines.
    • Batracomorphus indicus (Lethierry) China (Hubei, Sichuan, Yunnan, Taiwan), Philippines, Sri Lanka, India, Myanmar, Burma, Flores, Krakatau, Lombok, Seychelles, Sumbawa.
    • Batracomorphus irroratus Lewis China, Afghanistan, Albania, Armenia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belgium, Bohemia, Bulgaria, Czechia, Slovak, Denmark, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Lithuania, Moldova, Mongolia, Moravia, Poland, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia, Switzerland, Tajikistan, Turkey, Turkmenia, Ukraine, United Kingdom, Uzbekistan.
    • Batracomorphus juno Knight, 1983 rec. nov. China (Shaanxi, Guizhou), Philippines, Borneo, and West Malaysia.
    • Batracomorphus laminocus Cai and He China (Zhejiang).
    • Batracomorphus lateprocessus Li China (Shaanxi, Zhejiang, Hunan).
    • Batracomorphus lineatus Shen and Cai China (Henan).
    • Batracomorphus lunatus Cai and He China (Guizhou, Shaanxi, Zhejiang).
    • Batracomorphus matsumurai (Metcalf) China (Zhejiang, Hennan, Guizhou, Sichuan, Taiwan), Japan, North Korea.
    • Batracomorphus notatus (Kuoh) China (Yunnan, Guizhou).
    • Batracomorphus pandarus Knight China (Xinjiang, Shaanxi,), Borneo.
    • Batracomorphus paradentatus (Li and Wang) China (Yunnan, Guizhou).
    • Batracomorphus pianmaensis Li China (Yunnan).
    • Batracomorphus punctatus Li and Wang China (Guizhou).
    • Batracomorphus reflexus (Kuoh) China (Yunnan).
    • Batracomorphus rinkihonis (Matsumura) China (Zhejiang, Henan, Taiwan).
    • Batracomorphus spadix Shen and Cai China (Henan).
    • Batracomorphus strictus Li China (Hainan, Guizhou).
    • Batracomorphus subfuscus (Li and Wang) China (Shaanxi, Henan, Guizhou, Zhejiang).
    • Batracomorphus trifurcatus Li China (Hainan, Zhejiang, Guizhou).
    • Batracomorphus viridulus (Melichar) China (Henan, Zhejiang, Sichuan, Yunnan, Huazhong), Japan, Korea.
    • Batracomorphus xinxianensis Cai and Shen China (Henan).

3.2.2. Key to Species of Batracomorphus Based on Males from Qinling Mountain in Shaanxi, China

  • Forewing without fine hair and punctation (Figure 2 and Figure 4A,B)…………………….2
    -
    Forewing with obvious fine setae or punctation (Figure 3 and Figure 4D,E)…………………………………………………………………………………………6
  • Aedeagus base strongly enlarged and expanded ventrally (Figure 10D), pygophore process nearly straight, thin (Figure 10A,B)………………B. lateprocessus Li and Wang
    -
    Aedeagus base not expanded ventrally, pygophore process not straight……………3
  • Style internal rim serrated subapically (Figure 5D); pygophore process slightly bifid at apex (Figure 5C), aedeagus with rounded lateral flange at apex (Figure 5E) …………………………………………………………………………B. allionii (Turton)
    -
    Style internal rim not serrated subapically………………………………………………4
  • Pygophore process with ventral rim serrate subapically, approximately as long as pygofer (Figure 7A,B); aedeagus concave in centre and oval in ventral view (Figure 7D).……………………….………………………………..……B. subfuscus (Li and Wang)
    -
    Pygophore process with ventral rim not serrated subapically…………………………5
  • Style stout with subapical ridge, apex hooked laterad (Figure 6C); aedeagus shaft with lateral margins distinctly concave in ventral view (Figure 6F)….…B. pandarus Knight
    -
    Style slender without subapical ridge, apex hooked mesad (Figure 11C); aedeagus shaft with sides triangularly produced laterad in ventral view (Figure 10E)…………………………………………………………………B. clavatus Cai and Shen
  • Style with hooked apex, slightly expanded proximally (Figure 9C); pygophore process with small spine on ventral rim subapically, heel-like (Figure 9B); aedeagus shaft slender, apex transparent (Figure 9D,E)………………………………B. fletcheri sp. nov.
    -
    Style apex not hooked ………………………………………………………………………7
  • Style apex bifid with finger-like lateral and triangular mesal projection (Figure 12C); pygophore process apex bifid with branches widely divergent (Figure 12B); aedeagus apex with triangular lateral extensions in ventral view (Figure 12D) …….………….…………………………………………………B. lunatus Cai and He
    -
    Style not bifid at apex, other features not as above………………………………………8
  • Style broadened preapically then abruptly narrowed with apex hooked dorsally (Figure 8C); pygophore process sinuate, tapering to acute apex, with small teeth subapically (Figure 8B,E); aedeagus shaft evenly curved and tapered from base to apex in lateral view (Figure 8F)……………………………………………B. juno Knight rec. nov.
    -
    Style slightly and evenly tapered with T-like apex (Figure 13C,E); aedeagus shaft bent posterad preapically in lateral view, apex bifid with processes extended laterad (Figure 13D,F)……..………………………………………………B. geminatus (Li and Wang)

3.2.3. Distribution

All nine species are found in two zoogeographical regions as in Figure 1. Among them, five species (B. juno, B. clavatus, B. lateprocessus, B. lunatus and B. geminatus) are distributed in the northern slope of Qinling Mountain, with B. fletcheri Hu and Dai sp. nov. only occurring in the south slope. Of the remaining species, B. allionii, B. pandarus and B. subfuscus, are from the southern to the northern slope. This study extends the known ranges of several species of the genus.
In the following section, detailed information on the collected specimens is reported with comments, and the descriptions of nine species are provided.

3.3. Species Description

3.3.1. Batracomorphus Allionii (Turton, 1802)

Figure 2D–F and Figure 5A–H.
Cicada prasina Fabricius, 1794: 38 [27] (Prim. hom.: Cicada prasine Pallas, 1773).
Cicada allionii Turton, 1802: 594 [28].
Tettigonia prasine, Latreille, 1804: 322 [29].
Jassus prasinus, Germar, 1821: 81 [30].
Batracomorphus prasinus (Fabricius): Lindberg, 1923: 69 [31]; Ossiannilsson, 1981: 355, figs. 1150–1158 [32].
Batracomorphus angustior Jacobi, 1943: 30 [33].
Batrachomorphus [sic] prasinus (Fabricius): Ribaut, 1952: 444, figs. 1178–1183 [34].
Batrachomorphus [sic] fabricii Metcalf, 1955: 266 [35], nov. pro. Cicada prasina Fabricius, 1794 [nec Cicada prasina Pallas, 1773].
Batracomorphus fabricii Metcalf, 1955: 266 [35], n. nov. pro Cicada prasina Fabricius, 1794, nec Pallas, 1773; Vilbaste, 1965: 31 [36].
Batracomorphus allionii, Metcalf, 1966: 121 [37]; Vilbaste, 1968: 62 [38]; Nast, 1987: 580 [39]; Anufriev and Emeljnaov, 1988: 85, Figure 57(7) [40]; Cai and Shen, 1998: 243 [41]; Cai et al., 2001: 187 [42]; Nickel 2003: 101 [43]; Cai and Shen, 2010: 17 [21]; Malenovsky and Lauterer, 2012: 228 [44]; Dai et al., 2013:149 [45]; Zhang et al., 2017:189 [46].
Iassus dentatus Kuoh, 1986: 83 [20]; Cai and Shen, 2001: 187 [42].
Iassus trunctus Li and Wang, 1993: 17 [18].
Batracomorphus dentatus, Li and Wang, 2003: 130 [19].
Batracomorphus trunctus, Li and Wang, 2003: 130 [19]; Cai and Shen, 2010: 17 [21].
Description. Male 5.2–6.8 mm long, 1.0–1.3 mm wide across eyes, 2.0–2.5 mm wide across hind margin of pronotum; Female 7.0–8.0 mm long.
Pale stramineous to pale yellowish green, with fuscous spot at base of appendix.
Pygophore narrowed to round caudal margin, inner process slender and straight through most of length, abruptly curved ventrally near apex, apex shallowly concave. Sub-genital plate semi-membranous, elongate, with a multiseriate row of long hair-like setae on ventral margin near mid-length and a short uniseriate row of long hair-like setae on dorsolateral margin near mid-length. Style narrowed near middle, slightly expanded distally with mesal margin serrate, apex hook-like. Aedeagus slender, dorsoatrium relatively long, approximately 2/3 length of aedeagus shaft, shaft with conspicuous lamellate lateral expansion subapically and lamellate extensions on anterior margin; gonopore extending approximately one-third length of shaft; apical incision short, approximately one-third length of gonopore.
Material examined. 4 ♂, Shaanxi, Fengxian County, 8.vii.1980, 798 m, Sun Hong; 1 ♂, Shaanxi, Liuba County, Miaotaizi, 19.vii.1995, Zhang Wenzhu and Ren Liyun, 1 ♂, Shaanxi, Taibai Mountain, vii.2002, 1170 m, Dai Wu (Figure 1).
Distribution. China (Heilongjiang, Jilin, Liaoning, Inner Mongolia, Shaanxi, Zhejiang, Henan, Hubei, Anhui, Shandong, Yunnan, Guizhou, Sichuan), Austria, Azerbaijan, Belgium, Czech, Slovakia, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Kazakhstan, Latvia, Lithuania, Mongolia, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Romania, Russia, Spain, United Kingdom, Ukraine.
Remarks. B. allionii is mainly distributed in Europe. This species was originally described by Fabricius [27] from Italy as Cicada prasina and transferred to Batracomorphus by Lindberg [32]. Metcalf [36] found this name was a homonym and proposed the replacement name fabricii. Later, Metcalf [38] synonymized B. fabricii with B. allionii (Turton, 1802). Recently, two Chinese species, B. dentatus (Kuoh) and B. trunctus (Li and Wang) was considered to be a synonym with B. allionii (Turton) by Cai and Shen [21]. Based on the description and the illustrations of male genitilia provided by Ribaut [35] and Ossiannilsson [33], Chinese specimens we examined should be B. allionii.
Hosts. Cytisus scoparius and Genista tinctoria, and perhaps additional species of woody Fabaceae, and bamboo.

3.3.2. Batracomorphus pandarus Knight, 1983

Figure 2A–C and Figure 6A–G
Batracomorphus pandarus Knight, 1983: 109, figs. 369–373 [8]; Wang et al., 2010: 168, figs. 1–3 [11].
Description. Male 4.0–5.5 mm long, 0.9–1.1 mm wide across eyes, 1.8–2.2 mm wide across hind margin of pronotum. Female 5.0–6.0 mm long, 0.9–1.1 mm wide across eyes, 1.9–2.2 mm wide across hind margin of pronotum.
Colour pale stramineous. Forewing with appendix at base piceous.
Pygofer side tapering gradually to blunt rounded margin, with many macrosetae near posterior margin, inner process moderately slender, arched near base then straight to ventromedially bent and tapered apex. Sub-genital plates semi-membranous, elongate, with a multiseriate row of long hair-like setae on ventral margin near mid-length and a short uniseriate row of long hair-like setae on dorsolateral margin near mid-length. Style simple, sinuate, width nearly uniform throughout length; apex hooked anterolaterally. Aedeagus with shaft slender, directed dorsally with apical one-fourth curved antero dorsally, tapering to apex in both lateral and posterior aspect, anterolateral margins produced flange-like apically and turned anteriorly. Gonopore extending approximately two-fifths length of shaft, apical incision approximately 3/4 length of gonopore.
Material examined. 1 ♂, Shaanxi, Baoji, Jialingjiang Park, 6.viii.2017, Zhu Qing and Xu YiFei; 2 ♂, Shaanxi, Baoji, Jialingjiang Park, 9.viii.2017, Zhu Qing, Xu YiFei; 1 ♂, Shaanxi, Baoji, Jialingjiang Park, 10.viii.2017, Zhu Qing, Xu YiFei (at light); 3 ♂, 1 ♀, Shaanxi, Ningshan, Huoditang Forest Station, 17–19. vii.2018, Sun Qihan; 1 ♂, Shaanxi, Ningshan, Huoditang Forest Station, 18.vii.2018, Xu Zhixin; 9 ♂, Shaanxi, Ningshan, Huoditang Forest Station, 20.viii.2018, Xu Yifei; 5 ♂, Shaanxi, Zhuque Forest Park, 22~25.vii.2007, Dai Wu; 1 ♂, Shaanxi, Zhuque Forest Park, 22~25.vii.2007, Yao Xia; 1 ♂ 2 ♀, Shaanxi, Hanzhong, 14.viii.2012, Gao Min (Figure 1).
Distribution. China (Shaanxi, Xinjiang), Borneo.
Remarks. This species was described by Knight in 1983 [8], based on three male specimens from Borneo. It is very similar to B. romulus Knight [8] but can be differentiated from the latter by the more robust aedeagal shaft and lack of the lateral flange-like expansion at the base of the shaft.

3.3.3. Batracomorphus subfuscus (Li and Wang, 1993)

Figure 2G–I and Figure 7A–G
Iassussubfuscus Li and Wang, 1993: 18, Figure 4A–E [18].
Batracomorphusnigromarginattus Cai and Shen, 1999: 37 [47]; Cai, He and Gu, 2001: 187 [42]; Fang and Wu, 2001:34 [48]; Zhang et al., 2017:190 [46]. syn. nov.
Batracomorphussubfuscus, Li and Wang, 2003: 131 [19].
Description. Male 5.8–7.9 mm long, 1.2–1.3 mm wide across eyes, 2.1–2.2 mm wide across hind margin of pronotum.
Colour pale yellowish. Forewing with appendix piceous.
Pygofer side longer than height, tapering to acute apex, with many macrosetae near posterior margin, inner process moderately slender, extended straight posterodorsad to mid-length then bent posteroventrad, ventral margin serrate near apex, apex acuminate. Style thin, abruptly narrowed and sinuate in distal 1/4, apex hooked ventromesad. Connective stem gradually expanded posteriorly. Sub-genital plate thin, with many long fine setae along both margins. Aedeagus simple, shaft elongate, slender in lateral aspect, curving anterodorsally, laterally expanded in distal 1/3 subapically in posterior aspect, apical incision very short.
Material examined. 4 ♂, Shaanxi, Ningshan, Huoditang Forest Station, 17–19.vii.2018, Sun Qihan; 6 ♂, Shaanxi, Ningshan, Huoditang Forest Station, 18–19.vii.2018, Xu ZhiXin; 4 ♂, Shaanxi, Ningshan, Huoditang Forestry Station, 18.vii.2018, Xu YiFei; 3 ♂, Shaanxi, Taibai Mountain, Haopingsi, 15.vii.2002, 1170 m, Dai Wu (Figure 1) (NWAFU).
Distribution. China (Shaanxi, Henan, Guizhou, Zhejiang).
Remarks. This species was described based on one male and two female specimens deposited in the collection of Guizhou University. The illustrations given by Li and Wang (1993) [18] were misleading. Dr. J.C. Xing checked the type specimen and confirmed that the male genitalia illustrated here agree with the male genitalia of the holotype. B. nigromarginattus was described from Henan by Cai and Shen (1999) [48]. Based on the descriptions and illustrations provided by Li and Wang (1993) [18] and Cai and Shen (1999) [48], we propose the synonymy of these two taxa. This species is similar to B. allionii (Turton) but can be distinguished by the forewings with a dark brown appendix, the aedeagal shaft curved dorsally near the apex, and the appendage of pygofer taper to apex.

3.3.4. Batracomorphus juno Knight, 1983 rec. nov.

Figure 3A–C and Figure 8A–G
Batracomorphus juno Knight, 1983: 125, figs. 493–503 [8].
Description. Male 3.9–4.7 mm long, 0.9–1.0 mm wide across eyes, 1.6–2.0 mm wide across hind margin of pronotum.
Colour yellowish green. Forewings with distinctive fine setae and punctation black; appendix at base fuscous.
Pygofer side round apically, with many macrosetae near posterior margin, inner process slender, sinuate posteriorly, apex acute, curved posterodorsally, ventral margin acutely ridged subapically, sometimes with spur-like process, variable in relative length of process distad of spur. Sub-genital plate semi-membranous, elongate, with a multiseriate row of long hair-like setae on ventral margin near mid-length. Styles with apical process increasing gradually in width posteriorly, abruptly narrowed subapically to short acute dorsally hooked apex, ventral margin of subapical constriction acutely ridged. Aedeagus simple; shaft directed dorsally, tapered to apex over distal half; gonopore extending approximately two-thirds length of shaft; apical incision slightly shorter than gonopore, extending to near mid-length of shaft.
Material examined. 1 ♂, Shaanxi, FengXian, 7.viii.1980, 798 m, Sun Hong; 1 ♂, Shaanxi, FengXian, 15.vii.1995, Zhang Wenzhu and Ren Liyun (Figure 1). Other material. 1 ♂, Guizhou, 12.vii.2018, Zhu Qing (NWAFU).
Distribution. China (Shaanxi, Guizhou), Philippines, Borneo, and West Malaysia.
Notes: This species was described based on a series of specimens from Philippines, Borneo, and West Malaysia. It is similar to B. spadix Shen et Cai [21] but differs from the latter in having the style slightly curved in ventral aspect with apex hooked directed dorsally, and the pygophore processes slender and sinuate with the apex acute and directed dorsally, and exterior rim serrated.

3.3.5. Batracomorphus fletcheri Hu and Dai sp. nov.

Figure 3D–F and Figure 9A–G
Description. Male 5.0 mm long, 1.0 mm wide across eyes, 1.9 mm wide across hind margin of pronotum.
Colour yellowish green. Forewings with distinctive fine setae and punctation black; appendix at base fuscous.
Pygophore protruding apically, with many macrosetae near caudal margin, inner process slender and evenly arched through most of length, broadened and recurved postero-dorsally near apex, apex foot-like with short, slender ventral heel and curved, tapered toe. Style thin near base slightly expanded beyond mid-length, unevenly tapered to dorsolaterally hooked apex. Sub-genital plate transparent and thin, long, with many long bristles on each margin. Aedeagus with shaft slender, elongate, directed dorsad and curved slightly anterad near apex, apex slightly narrowed in lateral view; parallel sided through most of length in posterior view; gonopore and apical incision relatively long, extending over one half of shaft.
Material examined. Holotype: ♂, Shaanxi, Ningshan, Huoditang Forest Station, 18.vii.2018, Sun Qihan (NWAFU) (Figure 1); Paratype: 1 ♂, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 11.viii.1998 (at light) (NWAFU).
Distribution. China (Shaanxi, Zhejiang).
Etymology. This new species epithet honors Dr. Murray Fletcher, in recognition of his contributions to leafhopper studies.
Notes: This species is similar to B. lineatus Cai et Shen [21] but can be identified by the distinctive pygophore process with a foot-like apex, and the deeply divided apex of the aedeagus.

3.3.6. Batracomorphus Lateprocessus Li and Wang, 2003

Figure 3G–I and Figure 10A–F
Batracomorphuslateprocessus Li and Wang, 2003: 134 [19].
Description. Male 6.3–6.8 mm long, 1.2 mm wide across eyes, 2.2 mm wide across hind margin of pronotum.
Color stramineous. Forewings with distinctive fine setae and punctation black.
Pygophore round apically, with many macrosetae near posterior margin, inner process moderately slender and nearly straight, slightly expanded in apical half, hardly reaching pygofer apex, tapering gradually to slender acute apex in lateral aspect. Style expanded over distal half and then tapering and gradually curved to upturned finger-like apex. Sub-genital plate semi-membranous, elongate, with stem and lateral lobe basally; a group of long hair-like setae on dorsolateral margin of lobe; a short uniseriate row of long hair-like setae on dorsolateral margin near mid-length; a multiseriate row of long hair-like setae on ventral margin near mid-length, extending also over medial surface of plate. Aedeagus simple, strongly enlarged and expanded ventrally at base; shaft relatively short, slender, arising from dorsal part of atrium, evenly recurved anteriorly, tapering to apex; evenly tapered in posterior aspect; gonopore extending approximately 1/2 length of shaft, apical incision very short.
Material examined. 1 ♂, Shaanxi, Zhuque Forestry Park, 22~25.vii.2007, Dai Wu (Figure 1). Other material: 1 ♂, Hunan, Hupingshan, 20.vii.2006, 1040 m, Lv Lin; 2 ♂, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 27~26.viii.2000, Dai Wu and Wei Cong (NWAFU).
Distribution. China (Shaanxi, Zhejiang, Hunan)
Remarks. This species was described based on a male and a female specimen from Yunnan. Unfortunately, the illustrations given by Li and Wang (2003) [19] were misleading. Dr. Xing (personal communication) confirmed that the male genitalia illustrated here agree with the male genitalia of the holotype. This species resembles B. thetis Knight [8], but can be distinguished by the slender aedeagal shaft with the apex slightly curved anteriorly, and an apical process of style expanding over the distal half; the apical incision is very short.

3.3.7. Batracomorphus clavatus Cai and Shen, 2010

Figure 4A–C and Figure 11A–E
Batracomorphusclavatus Cai and Shen, 2010: 14, Figure 2A–G [21].
Description. Male 5.2–5.6 mm long, 0.9–1.1 mm wide across eyes, 1.9–2.0 mm wide across hind margin of pronotum. Female 5.5–6.3 mm long, 0.9–1.1 mm wide across eyes, 1.8–2.3 mm wide across hind margin of pronotum.
Colour stramineous. Forewing with appendix at base fuscous.
Pygophore protruding apically, distributed with sparsely short and thick bristles subapically, inner process slender, evenly arcuate, curving medially, tapering gradually to acute apex, ventral margin serrate near apex. Sub-genital plate semi-membranous, elongate, with uniseriate row of long hair-like setae on dorsolateral margin near mid-length and a multiseriate row of long hair-like setae on ventral margin near mid-length. Style long, slender, tapering gradually to acute dorsomedially hooked apex. Aedeagus with shaft short, evenly wide through most of length in lateral aspect, broadly rounded apically, directed posteriorly, and curved dorsally; in posterior aspect with lateral mar gins near mid-length expanded forming lamellate triangular flange; gonopore subapical at ventral margin.
Material examined. 3 ♂ 3 ♀, Shaanxi, Taibai, 14.viii.1981; 2 ♂ 2 ♀, Shaanxi, Taibai, 12.vii.1984; 2 ♂ 1 ♀, Shaanxi, Fengxian, 14.viii.1995, Zhang Wenzhu and Ren Liyun (Figure 1) (NWAFU).
Distribution. China (Shaanxi, Henan).
Remarks. This species was described by Shen and Cai [21] based on a male and a female specimen from Henan. It is similar to B. iulus Knight [8] but can be distinguished by the aedeagus with lamellate triangular flange at lateral margins near mid-length.

3.3.8. Batracomorphus lunatus Cai and He, 2001

Figure 4D–F and Figure 12A–G
Batracomorphus lunatus Cai and He [in Cai, He and Gu, 2001], 2001: 191, figs. 20–25. [42]; Li et al., 2012:193 [49]; Fang and Wu, 2001:34 [48]; Zhang et al., 2017, 189 [46].
Description. Male 5.5–6.0 mm long, 1.0 mm wide across eyes, 1.9 mm wide across hind margin of pronotum.
Colour stramineous. Forewings with distinctive fine setae and punctation black; appendix at base fuscous.
Pygophore narrowed gradually to rounded caudal margin, with many macrosetae near posterior margin, inner process slender, elongate, arched dorsad at base, then straight through most of length to slightly decurved apex; with small subapical spur on ventral margin, portion of the process distad of spur usually longer than spur. Style slightly expanded at mid-length, tapering gradually to short acute ventromesally hooked apex, with small expansion subapically on dorsal margin. Sub-genital plate semi-membranous, elongate, with stem and lateral lobe basally; a group of long hair-like setae on dorsolateral margin of lobe; a short uniseriate row of long hair-like setae on dorsolateral margin near mid-length; a multiseriate row of long hair-like setae on ventral margin near mid-length. Aedeagus with shaft in lateral aspect slender, elongate, directed dorsally with apical third curving anterodorsally, in ventral view slightly wider; lateral margin over distal one-seventh expanded as lamellate triangular flange; gonopore extending to just basad of mid-length of shaft; apical incision short.
Material examined. 1 ♂, Shaanxi, Zhuque Forestry Park, 22~25.vii.2007, Dai Wu (Figure 1). Other material: 24 ♂, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 25.vii.2011, 1500 m, Wang Yang (at light) (NWAFU).
Distribution: China (Guizhou, Shaanxi, Zhejiang).
Remarks: B. lunatus was described by Cai and He [42] from Zhejiang, China. This species is similar to B. peteos Knight [8] but differs from the latter in having the style and pygofer processes with subapical expansions, and the aedeagus with lamellate angular flanges apically. This species also resembles B. romulus Knight [8] but is distinguished by the aedeagus with a lamellate angular flange apically, and the style and pygofer processes with subapical expansions.

3.3.9. Batracomorphus geminatus (Li and Wang, 1993)

Figure 4D–F and Figure 13A–H
Iassus geminatus Li and Wang, 1993: 18 [18].
Batracomorphus geminatus, Li and Wang, 2003: 131 [19].
Description. Male 5.6–6.0 mm long, 1.2 mm wide across eyes, 2.0 mm wide across hind margin of pronotum. Female 6.2 mm long.
Color yellowish green. Forewing with appendix at base fuscous.
Pygophore narrowing gradually to rounded caudal margin, with many macrosetae near posterior margin, inner process elongate, slender, arched throughout length, apex acute. Sub-genital plate transparent and thin, long, with fewer and short bristles born on each of side margins. Style with approximately uniform width to mid-length, then slightly widened to arched distal half, terminating in acute dorsally directed apex and with elongate ventrally directed projection subapically on ventral margin. Aedeagus with shaft slender, elongate, directed posteriorly and turning posteroventrally at sub-apex, terminating in a pair of divergent elongate processes directed laterad, with apices curved dorsally; gonopore subapical at ventral margin, apical incision very short.
Material examined. 1 ♂, Shaanxi, Wugong, 19.vi.1982 (at light) (Figure 1). Other material: 1 ♂, Hainan, Wuzhishan, 3.iv.2008, 600 m, Men Qiulei (NWAFU).
Distribution. China (Shaanxi, Guizhou, Hainan).
Remarks. This species was described based on a male and a female specimen from Yunnan. Unfortunately, the illustrations given by Li and Wang (1993) [18] were misleading. Dr. Xing (personal communication) confirmed that the male genitalia illustrated here agree with the male genitalia of the holotype. This species resembles B. enyo Knight [8] but differs from the latter by elongate pygophore processes and the aedeagus curved posteroventrally with long apical process directed laterally and then curved dorsally.

4. Conclusions

Nine species of the leafhopper genus Batracomorphus from Shaanxi are reviewed based on comparative morphological study, including one new species and one new synonym. This study extends the known ranges of several species of the genus. This study reveals considerable variation in several structures, especially the pygophore processes and aedeagus. Compared with the aedeagus, the pygophore processes are more variable which may provide a new focus for further research.
The Qinling Mountain belongs to a warm temperate zone and subtropical climate, which is suitable for species of the genus Batracomorphus mainly distributed in the tropical and subtropical environment. Species of Batracomorphus are mainly distributed on the northern slope from the Figure 1. Since a few samples were collected this time, the statistical results of leafhopper species may be affected. Follow-up research on leafhopper diversity from Qinling Mountain need to collect more specimens for confirmation.

Author Contributions

Methodology, W.D.; investigation, Y.H., L.G. and Z.H.; resources, W.D.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.H. and W.D.; writing—review and editing, W.D. and Y.H.; supervision, W.D.; project administration, W.D.; funding acquisition, W.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Please turn to the CRediT taxonomy for the term explanation.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 31772514, 31572306, 31272343), the Program of Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China (2015FY210300), and partly supported by the Program of Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences (2019-4-10).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Chris Dietrich and John Richard Schrock who reviewed the manuscript and offered several valuable suggestions for improvement. We are also thankful to Jichun Xing (Guizhou University, Guiyang, China) for checking some type specimens for this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Oman, P.W.; Knight, W.J.; Nielson, M.W. Leafhoppers (Cicadellidae): A Bibliography, Generic Check-List and Index to the World Literature 1956–1985; CAB International Institute of Entomology: Wallingford, UK, 1990; p. 368. [Google Scholar]
  2. Dietrich, C.H. Keys to the families of Cicadomorpha and subfamilies and tribes of Cicadellidae (Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha). Fla. Entomol. 2005, 88, 502–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dai, W.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Dietrich, C.H. A new Oriental genus of Iassini leafhoppers (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Iassinae) with description of four new species. Zootaxa 2010, 2641, 15–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Dai, W.; Dietrich, C.H.; Zhang, Y. A review of the leafhopper tribe Hyalojassini (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Iassinae) with description of new taxa. Zootaxa 2015, 3911, 1–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Krishnankutty, S.M.; Dietrich, C.H.; Dai, W.; Siddappaji, M.H. Phylogeny and historical biogeography of leafhopper subfamily Iassinae (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) with a revised tribal classification based on morphological and molecular data. Syst. Entomol. 2016, 41, 580–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lewis, R.H. Descriptions of some new genera of British Homoptera. Trans. Entomol. Soc. 1834, 1, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Quartau, J.A.; Davies, R.G. A comparison of different numerical methods applied to the taxonomy of Batracomorphus Lewis (Insecta, Homoptera, Cicadellidae, Iassinae): Cluster analysis. Rev. Biol. 1981, 16, 550–594. [Google Scholar]
  8. Knight, W.J. The leafhopper genus Batracomorphus (Cicadellidae, Iassinae) in the eastern Oriental and Australian regions. Bull. Br. Mus. (Nat. Hist.) Entomol. 1983, 47, 27–210. [Google Scholar]
  9. Liang, A.P.; Cai, P.; Kuoh, C.L.; He, J.H. Homoptera: Cicadellidae. In Insects of the Three Gorge Reservoir area of Yangtze River; Yang, X.K., Ed.; Chongqing Publishing House: Chongqing, China, 1997; pp. 324–348. [Google Scholar]
  10. Yan, J.H.; Li, H.J.; Peng, H.Y.; Zhou, X.Z.; Gao, B.D. Bionomics of Batracomorphus dentatus and its control. Chin. Bull. Entomol. 2006, 43, 562–566. [Google Scholar]
  11. Wang, S.S.; Li, J.; Li, K.Y.; Wang, P.L.; Li, G.Y. A new Chinese record species of leafhoppers from wine grapes in Xinjiang. Plant Prot. 2010, 36, 168–171. [Google Scholar]
  12. Grylls, N.E. Leafhopper vectors and the plant disease agents they transmit in Australia. In Leafhopper Vectors and Plant Disease Agents; Maramorosch, K., Harris, K.F., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA; San Francisco, CA, USA; London, UK, 1979; Volume I-XVI, pp. 179–214. [Google Scholar]
  13. Osmelak, J.A.; Emmett, R.W.; Pywell, M. Monitoring for potential leafhopper vectors (Hemiptera: Cicadelloidea and Fulgoroidea) of the causal agent of Australian grapevine yellows. Plant Prot. Q. 1989, 4, 8–10. [Google Scholar]
  14. Linnavuori, R.E.; Quartau, J.A. Revision of the Ethiopian Cicadellidae (Hemiptera-Homoptera): Iassinae and Acroponinae. Foundation pour favoriser les recherches scientifiquesen Afrique. Etudes Cont. Afr. 1975, 3, 1–170. [Google Scholar]
  15. Quartau, J.A. On some numerical methods applied to the taxonomy of some leafhoppers (Homoptera, Cicadellidae): An empirical investigation and critical appraisal. Acta Ent. Fenn. 1981, 38, 30–41. [Google Scholar]
  16. Evans, J.W. Some leafhoppers from New Guinea, Australia and Thailand belonging to the subfamily Jassinae and a new genus from New Guinea referred to a new subfamily the Acostermminae (Homoptera: Cicadellidae). Pac. Insects 1972, 14, 647–667. [Google Scholar]
  17. McBeath, J.; McBeath, J.H. Biodiversity conservation in China: Policies and practice. J. Internation. Wildlife Law Policy 2006, 9, 293–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, Z.Z.; Wang, L.M. Five new species of the genus Iassus from Guizhou province, China (Homoptera, Iassidae). Zool. Res. 1993, 14, 15–20. [Google Scholar]
  19. Li, Z.Z.; Wang, L.M. Notes on Chinese species of Batracomorphus Lewis with descriptions of seven new species (Homoptera, Cicadellidae, Iassinae). Acta Entomol. Sin. 2003, 28, 130–136. [Google Scholar]
  20. Kuoh, C.L. Five new species of the genus Iassus. Acta Zootaxonomica Sin. 1986, 11, 80–85. [Google Scholar]
  21. Cai, P.; Shen, X.L. Three new species of the genus Batracomorphus Lewis (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Iassinae) from China. Entomotaxonomia 2010, 32, 13–19. [Google Scholar]
  22. Yang, X.K. Insect Fauna of Middle-West Qinling Range and South Mountains of Gansu Province; Science Press: Beijing, China, 2005; p. 1055. [Google Scholar]
  23. Yang, X.K. Insect Fauna of the Qinling Mountains; World Publishing Corporation: Xi’an, China, 2018; p. 684. [Google Scholar]
  24. Cui, J.Z.; Bai, M.; Fan, R.J.; Wu, H. Catalogue of the Insect Type Specimens Deposited in China; China Forestry Publishing House: Beijing, China, 2009; Volume 2, p. 653. [Google Scholar]
  25. Cui, J.Z.; Bai, M.; Wu, H.; Ji, L.Q. Catalogue of the Insect Type Specimens Deposited in China; China Forestry Publishing House: Beijing, China, 2007; Volume 1, p. 792. [Google Scholar]
  26. Bai, M.; Cui, J.Z.; Hu, J.Y.; Li, L.Z. Catalogue of the Insect Type Specimens Deposited in China; China Forestry Publishing House: Beijing, China, 2014; Volume 3, p. 277. [Google Scholar]
  27. Fabricius, J.C. Ryngota. Entomologia systematica emendata et aucta: Secundun classes, ordines, genera, species, adjectis synonimis, locis, observationibus, descriptionibus. Impensis Christ. Gottl. Proft. Hafniae 1794, 4, 1–472. [Google Scholar]
  28. Turton, W. Order II. Hemiptera. Translated from Gmelin’s last edition of Systema Naturae, by Sir Charles Linne. Amended and enlarged by the improvements and discoveries of later naturalists and societies, Holmiae. Impensis Laurentii Salvii 1802, 2, 1–719. [Google Scholar]
  29. Latreille, P.A. Division seconde. Famille quarante-huitième. Cicadaires; Cicadariae. Histoire naturelle, générale et particulière des Crustacés et des Insectes: Ouvrage faisant suite aux oeuvres de Leclerc de Buffon, et partie du cours complet d’histoire naturelle rédigé par C. S. Sonnini, membre de plusieurs Sociétés savantes. F. Dufart. Paris 1804, 12, 5–424. [Google Scholar]
  30. Germar, E.F. Bemerkungen über einige Gattungen der Cicadarien. Mag. Entomol. Halle 1821, 4, 1–106. [Google Scholar]
  31. Lindberg, H. Zur Kenntnis der Cicadinengattung Batracomorphus Lew. Not. Entomol. 1923, 3, 68–71. [Google Scholar]
  32. Ossiannilsson, F. The Auchenorrhyncha (Homoptera) of Fennoscandia & Denmark, Part 2: Families Cicadidae, Cercopidae, Membracidae, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae. Fauna Entomol. Scand. 1981, 7, 223–593. [Google Scholar]
  33. Jacobi, A. Zur Kenntnis der Insekten von Mandschuko. 12. Beitrag. Eine Homopterenfaunula der Mandschurei. (Homoptera: Fulgoroidea, Cercopoidea & Jassoidea.). Arb. Morph. Tax. Entomol. Berlin-Dahlem. 1943, 10, 21–31. [Google Scholar]
  34. Ribaut, H. Homopters Auchenorhynques. II. (Jassidae). Fauna Fr. 1952, 57, 1–474. [Google Scholar]
  35. Metcalf, Z.P. New names in the Homoptera. J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 1955, 45, 262–267. [Google Scholar]
  36. Vilbaste, J. On Homoptera Cicadinea of Altais. Akademiya Nauk Estonskoï SSR; Institut Zoologii i Botaniki: Tartu, Estonia, 1965; p. 144. [Google Scholar]
  37. Metcalf, Z.P. General catalogue of the Homoptera. Fascicle VI. Cicadelloidea. Part 15. Iassidae; USDA: Washington, DC, USA, 1966; p. 229.
  38. Vilbaste, J. Contribution to the Auchenorrhyncha fauna of the Maritime Territeory; Valgus: Tallin, Estonia, 1968; p. 178, [Russian with German summary]. [Google Scholar]
  39. Nast, J. The Auchenorrhyncha (Homoptera) of Europe. Ann. Zool. Warszawa 1987, 40, 535–661. [Google Scholar]
  40. Anufriev, G.A.; Emeljanov, A.F. Suborder Cicadinea (Auchenorrhyncha). In A. Keys to the Insects of the Far East of the USSR; Ler, P.A., Ed.; Nauka: Leningrad, Russia, 1988; Volume 2, pp. 9–727. [Google Scholar]
  41. Cai, P.; Shen, X.C. Homoptera: Cicadellidae. In The Fauna and Taxonomy of Insects in Henan, Insects of the Mountains Funiu Regions; Shen, X.C., Shi, Z.Y., Eds.; China Agricultural Scientech Press: Beijing, China, 1998; Volume 2, pp. 242–250. [Google Scholar]
  42. Cai, P.; He, J.H.; Gu, X.L. Homoptera: Cicadellidae. In Insects of Tianmushan National Nature Reserve; Wu, H., Pan, C.W., Eds.; Science Press: Beijing, China, 2001; pp. 185–218. [Google Scholar]
  43. Nickel, H. The Leafhoppers and Planthoppers of Germany (Hemiptera, Auchenorrhyncha): Patterns and Startegies in a Highly Diverse Group of Phytophagous Insects; Pensoft: Sofia, Bulgaria; Moscow, Russia, 2003; pp. 1–460. [Google Scholar]
  44. Malenovsky, I.; Lauterer, P. Leafhoppers and planthoppers (Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha) of the Bílé Karpaty Protected Landscape Area and Biosphere Reserve (Czech Republic). Acta Musei Moraviae. Sci. Biol. (Brno) 2012, 96, 155–322. [Google Scholar]
  45. Dai, W.; Zhang, X.M.; Zhong, H.Y.; Wei, C.; Zhang, Y.L. Cicadellidae. In Insects in Helan Mountains of Inner Mongolia; Bai, X.S., Cai, W.Z., Nonnaizab, Eds.; Inner Mongolia People’s Publishing House: Inner Mongolia, China, 2013; pp. 147–158. [Google Scholar]
  46. Zhang, Y.L.; Lv, L.; Dai, W.; Huang, M.; Qing, D.Z.; Wei, C. Homoptera: Cicadellidae. In Fauna of Tianmu Mountain; Zhang, Y.L., Ed.; Zhejiang University Press: Hangzhou, China, 2017; Volume 4, pp. 70–205. [Google Scholar]
  47. Cai, P.; Shen, X.C. Homoptera: Cicadellidae. In The Fauna and Taxonomy of Insects in Henan, Insects of the Mountains Funiu and Dabie Regions; Shen, X.C., Pei, H.C., Eds.; China Agricultural Scientech Press: Beijing, China, 1999; Volume 4, pp. 36–44. [Google Scholar]
  48. Fang, Z.G.; Wu, H. A cheklist of insects from Zhejiang; China Forestry Press: Beijing, China, 2001; p. 452. [Google Scholar]
  49. Li, H.; Dai, R.H.; Li, Z.Z. Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Iassinae and Macropsinae. In Insects from Kuankuoshui landscape; Dai, R.H., Li, Z.Z., Jin, D.C., Eds.; Guizhou Science and Technology Publishing House: Guiyang, China, 2012; pp. 192–198. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Geographical distribution of Batracomorphus species in Qinling Mountain of Shaanxi. As shown in the figure: 1. B. allionii (Turton); 2. B. pandarus; 3. B. subfuscus (Li and Wang); 4. B. juno Knight rec. nov.; 5. B. fletcheri sp. nov.; 6. B. lateprocessus Li and Wang; 7. B. clavatus Cai and Shen; 8. B. lunatus Cai and He; 9. B. geminatus (Li and Wang).
Figure 1. Geographical distribution of Batracomorphus species in Qinling Mountain of Shaanxi. As shown in the figure: 1. B. allionii (Turton); 2. B. pandarus; 3. B. subfuscus (Li and Wang); 4. B. juno Knight rec. nov.; 5. B. fletcheri sp. nov.; 6. B. lateprocessus Li and Wang; 7. B. clavatus Cai and Shen; 8. B. lunatus Cai and He; 9. B. geminatus (Li and Wang).
Insects 12 00494 g001
Figure 2. Batracomophuspandarus Knight, 1983: (A) habitus, ventral view, (B) habitus, lateral view, (C) face; Batracomorphus allionii (Turbon, 1802): (D) habitus, ventral view, (E) habitus, lateral view, (F) face; Batracomorphus subfuscus (Li and Wang, 1993): (G) habitus, ventral view, (H) habitus, lateral view, (I). face.
Figure 2. Batracomophuspandarus Knight, 1983: (A) habitus, ventral view, (B) habitus, lateral view, (C) face; Batracomorphus allionii (Turbon, 1802): (D) habitus, ventral view, (E) habitus, lateral view, (F) face; Batracomorphus subfuscus (Li and Wang, 1993): (G) habitus, ventral view, (H) habitus, lateral view, (I). face.
Insects 12 00494 g002
Figure 3. Batracomorphusjuno Knight, 1983 rec. nov.: (A) habitus, ventral view, (B) habitus, lateral view, (C) face; Batracomorphus fletcheri sp. nov.: (D) habitus, ventral view, (E) habitus, lateral view, (F) face; Batracomorphus lateprocessus Li and Wang, 2003: (G) habitus, ventral view, (H) habitus, lateral view, (I). face.
Figure 3. Batracomorphusjuno Knight, 1983 rec. nov.: (A) habitus, ventral view, (B) habitus, lateral view, (C) face; Batracomorphus fletcheri sp. nov.: (D) habitus, ventral view, (E) habitus, lateral view, (F) face; Batracomorphus lateprocessus Li and Wang, 2003: (G) habitus, ventral view, (H) habitus, lateral view, (I). face.
Insects 12 00494 g003
Figure 4. Batracomophusclavatus Cai and Shen, 2010: (A) habitus, ventral view, (B) habitus, lateral view, (C) face; Batracomorphus lunatus Cai and He, 2001: (D) habitus, ventral view, (E) habitus, lateral view, (F) face; Batracomorphus geminatus (Li and Wang, 1993): (G) habitus, ventral view, (H) habitus, lateral view, (I) face.
Figure 4. Batracomophusclavatus Cai and Shen, 2010: (A) habitus, ventral view, (B) habitus, lateral view, (C) face; Batracomorphus lunatus Cai and He, 2001: (D) habitus, ventral view, (E) habitus, lateral view, (F) face; Batracomorphus geminatus (Li and Wang, 1993): (G) habitus, ventral view, (H) habitus, lateral view, (I) face.
Insects 12 00494 g004
Figure 5. Batracomorphus allionii (Turton, 1802): (A) genital capsule in lateral view; (B) pygofer side; (C) pygophore processes apex; (D) styles; (E) aedeagus, ventral view; (F) aedeagus, lateral view; (G) connective; (H) sub-genital plate.
Figure 5. Batracomorphus allionii (Turton, 1802): (A) genital capsule in lateral view; (B) pygofer side; (C) pygophore processes apex; (D) styles; (E) aedeagus, ventral view; (F) aedeagus, lateral view; (G) connective; (H) sub-genital plate.
Insects 12 00494 g005
Figure 6. Batracomophus pandarus Knight, 1983: (A) genital capsule in lateral view; (B) pygofer side and pygophore processes; (C) styles; (D) aedeagus, lateral view; (E) aedeagus apex, ventral view; (F) aedeagus, ventral view; (G) connective.
Figure 6. Batracomophus pandarus Knight, 1983: (A) genital capsule in lateral view; (B) pygofer side and pygophore processes; (C) styles; (D) aedeagus, lateral view; (E) aedeagus apex, ventral view; (F) aedeagus, ventral view; (G) connective.
Insects 12 00494 g006
Figure 7. Batracomorphus subfuscus (Li and Wang, 1993): (A) genital capsule in lateral view; (B) pygofer side and pygophore processes; (C) styles; (D) aedeagus, ventral view; (E) aedeagus, lateral view; (F) connective.
Figure 7. Batracomorphus subfuscus (Li and Wang, 1993): (A) genital capsule in lateral view; (B) pygofer side and pygophore processes; (C) styles; (D) aedeagus, ventral view; (E) aedeagus, lateral view; (F) connective.
Insects 12 00494 g007
Figure 8. Batracomorphus juno Knight, 1983: (A) genital capsule in lateral view; (B) pygofer side and pygophore processes; (C) styles; (D) styles apex; (E) pygophore processes apex; (F) aedeagus, lateral view; (G) aedeagus, ventral view; (H) connective.
Figure 8. Batracomorphus juno Knight, 1983: (A) genital capsule in lateral view; (B) pygofer side and pygophore processes; (C) styles; (D) styles apex; (E) pygophore processes apex; (F) aedeagus, lateral view; (G) aedeagus, ventral view; (H) connective.
Insects 12 00494 g008
Figure 9. Batracomorphus fletcheri sp. nov.: (A) genital capsule in lateral view; (B) pygofer side and pygophore processes; (C) paranere; (D) aedeagus, ventral view; (E) aedeagus, lateral view; (F) connective; (G) sub-genital plate.
Figure 9. Batracomorphus fletcheri sp. nov.: (A) genital capsule in lateral view; (B) pygofer side and pygophore processes; (C) paranere; (D) aedeagus, ventral view; (E) aedeagus, lateral view; (F) connective; (G) sub-genital plate.
Insects 12 00494 g009
Figure 10. Batracomorphus lateprocessus Li and Wang, 2003: (A) genital capsule in lateral view; (B) pygofer side and pygophore processes; (C) styles; (D) aedeagus, lateral view; (E) aedeagus, ventral view; (F) connective.
Figure 10. Batracomorphus lateprocessus Li and Wang, 2003: (A) genital capsule in lateral view; (B) pygofer side and pygophore processes; (C) styles; (D) aedeagus, lateral view; (E) aedeagus, ventral view; (F) connective.
Insects 12 00494 g010
Figure 11. Batracomorphus clavatus Cai and Shen, 2010: (A) genital capsule in lateral view; (B) pygofer side and pygophore processes; (C) styles; (D) aedeagus, ventral view; (E) aedeagus, lateral view; (F) connective.
Figure 11. Batracomorphus clavatus Cai and Shen, 2010: (A) genital capsule in lateral view; (B) pygofer side and pygophore processes; (C) styles; (D) aedeagus, ventral view; (E) aedeagus, lateral view; (F) connective.
Insects 12 00494 g011
Figure 12. Batracomorphus lunatus Cai and He, 2001: (A) genital capsule in lateral view; (B) pygofer side and pygophore processes; (C) styles; (D) aedeagus, ventral view; (E) aedeagus apex, lateral view; (F) aedeagus apex, lateral view; (G) connective.
Figure 12. Batracomorphus lunatus Cai and He, 2001: (A) genital capsule in lateral view; (B) pygofer side and pygophore processes; (C) styles; (D) aedeagus, ventral view; (E) aedeagus apex, lateral view; (F) aedeagus apex, lateral view; (G) connective.
Insects 12 00494 g012
Figure 13. Batracomorphus geminatus (Li and Wang, 1993): (A) genital capsule in lateral view; (B) pygofer side and pygophore processes; (C) styles; (D) aedeagus, ventral view; (E) styles apex aedeagus, ventral view; (F) aedeagus, lateral view; (G) connective; (H) sub-genital plate.
Figure 13. Batracomorphus geminatus (Li and Wang, 1993): (A) genital capsule in lateral view; (B) pygofer side and pygophore processes; (C) styles; (D) aedeagus, ventral view; (E) styles apex aedeagus, ventral view; (F) aedeagus, lateral view; (G) connective; (H) sub-genital plate.
Insects 12 00494 g013
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hu, Y.; Gao, L.; Han, Z.; Dai, W. Species Diversity in the Leafhopper Genus Batracomorphus Lewis (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Iassinae) from Qinling Mountain in Shaanxi. Insects 2021, 12, 494. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12060494

AMA Style

Hu Y, Gao L, Han Z, Dai W. Species Diversity in the Leafhopper Genus Batracomorphus Lewis (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Iassinae) from Qinling Mountain in Shaanxi. Insects. 2021; 12(6):494. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12060494

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hu, Yulin, Lili Gao, Zihan Han, and Wu Dai. 2021. "Species Diversity in the Leafhopper Genus Batracomorphus Lewis (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Iassinae) from Qinling Mountain in Shaanxi" Insects 12, no. 6: 494. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12060494

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop