Next Article in Journal
Aseptic Rearing and Infection with Gut Bacteria Improve the Fitness of Transgenic Diamondback Moth, Plutella xylostella
Previous Article in Journal
Symbiotic Plant Biomass Decomposition in Fungus-Growing Termites
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Insects
Volume 10
Issue 4
10.3390/insects10040088
insects-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Scanning Electron Microscopy of the Antennal Sensilla and Their Secretion Analysis in Adults of Aromia bungii (Faldermann, 1835) (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae)

by
Antonella Di Palma
1,*,
Marco Pistillo
1,
Raffaele Griffo
2,
Antonio P. Garonna
3 and
Giacinto S. Germinara
1
1
Department of the Science of Agriculture Food and Environment, University of Foggia, Via Napoli 25, 71100 Foggia, Italy
2
Plant Protection Service of Campania Region, Centro Direzionale, Isola A6, 80124 Naples, Italy
3
Department of Agriculture, University of Naples Federico II, Via Università 100, 80055 Portici, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2019, 10(4), 88; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects10040088
Submission received: 26 February 2019 / Revised: 21 March 2019 / Accepted: 23 March 2019 / Published: 28 March 2019
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: It has been proved that chemical signals play an important role in mating location and reproductive behavior in cerambycids; moreover, they rely on contact chemoreception for mate recognition. Methods: Adult antennae of Aromia bungii were observed using scanning electron microscopy and adult antennal secretions were collected and analyzed with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Results: Twelve different types of sensilla were morphologically described on the antennae of A. bungii. At least six mechanoreceptors—one gustative, one putative chemo- or thermoreceptor, and three multiporous olfactory receptors—are present on the antennae of both sexes while a receptor-type of unclear function is limited to males. Secretions associated with sensilla basiconica were observed for the first time in a cerambycid species. Conclusions: Sensilla basiconica should play a role in odor perception detecting host tree volatiles and/or pheromones. Sensilla basiconica type 1 and 2 produce a viscous material accumulating on the antennal surface. Chemical analysis of adult antennal secretions highlighted marked differences between sexes. Some of the identified compounds have been previously reported as contact pheromone components of other cerambycid species. Our observations strongly suggest sensilla basiconica as the production sites of compounds involved in mate recognition.

1. Introduction

The red-necked longhorned beetle, Aromia bungii (Faldermann, 1835), is a wood-boring beetle and a major pest of stone fruit trees; it is native to the southeastern Palaearctic ecozone with an expansion in the Oriental Region, Europe and North America around 2008 [1,2]. In Europe, it was reported for the first time in field in Germany (Bavaria) on Prunus domestica subsp. institia (L.) Bonnier & Layens [3,4,5] and in Italy (Campania and Lombardia) on Prunus armeniaca (L.), P. avium (L) L., P. domestica L., P. persica (L.) Batsch and P. cerasifera Ehrh. 1784 [6,7,8,9,10]. In these areas, it is currently under eradication. Moreover, in 2014, A. bungii was added to the EPPO A1 list of pests recommended to regulate as a quarantine pest [10,11]. Recently, the EU established specific restrictive measures to avoid introduction and diffusion of A. bungii in Europe [12].
The olfactory system is the primary sense that insects use in analyzing the environment in crucial tasks such as finding food and nesting, migrating, mating, oviposition, identifying conspecific, etc. [13]. Regarding cerambycids, although their chemical ecology has been little studied, it has been proved that chemical signals play an important role in mating location and reproductive behavior [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. Moreover, longhorn beetles appear to rely on contact chemoreception for mate recognition. In fact, for several cerambycid beetles [15,19,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43], antennae or palpi contact is necessary in mating recognition and, hence, required before mating takes place. In addition, in few cerambycid species, the presence of antennal glands, probably involved in sex recognition, have been reported [44,45]. However, to our knowledge, no study has yet been carried out to characterize the composition of the antennal gland secretions in the family Cerambycidae.
Thus, the purpose of this study was to describe types, morphology and distribution of the antennal sensilla in adults of A. bungii, using scanning electron microcopy (SEM), and to characterize the composition of the male and female antennal secretions by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS). This study might be useful to increase the biological knowledge on this beetle and clarify some reproductive aspects such as the role of antennation for sex communication and the involvement of tactile together with chemical stimuli. These are fundamental aspects to develop suitable monitoring and control tools of this economically important pest also considering its recent invasion of North America, Japan, and Europe and the likely invasion of additional countries.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Beetles

Logs containing A. bungii larvae were collected from cut down trees in the Marigliano (Naples, Campania, Italy) area on 11 April 2017 and placed in rearing cages to obtain the adults starting from the first week of June 2017. Newly emerged adults were collected daily and placed individually in transparent plastic containers (6 cm diameter × 8 cm height). To allow air exchange, the containers were covered with screw caps provided with a central hole (2 cm) screened by a metallic net (mesh size 1 mm). Insects were maintained at 25 ± 2 °C, 60 ± 5% relative humidity, and 16:8 Light:Dark photoperiod and fed ad libitum with apple pieces that were renewed every 3 days.

2.2. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

Individuals for scanning electron microscopy were sexed and the heads, carrying the antennae, were removed under a stereomicroscope, stored in 70% ethanol and subsequently dehydrated in a graded alcohol series of 80%, 90%, and 100% ethanol. Then, the antennae were mounted on a stub with double-sided adhesive tape and gold sputtered in a Baltec SCD 005 sputter coater. The antennae were mounted on dorsal and ventral sides (both male and female usually keep the antennae extended in front of the head so that the general downward facing curvature of the antennae is retained and a dorsal and ventral side can be easily distinguished) on the stubs and examined and micrographed with a Hitachi TM3030 scanning electron microscope.

2.3. Preparation of Antennal Secretion Extracts

Antennal secretions present on the surface of the sixth to the ninth flagellomeres of 4-week-old living males and females were gently removed using the tip of sterile syringe needles paying attention to avoid antennal breaking and hemolymph leakage. Antennal secretions (about 0.5 mg) collected from specimens (n = 3) of each sex were dissolved in n-hexane (500 µL) and stored at −20 °C until needed.

2.4. Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS)

One microliter of extract was analyzed by a 7890B series gas chromatograph (Agilent Technologies) coupled with an Agilent 5977A mass selective detector (MSD) and equipped with a HP-5MS capillary column (30 mm × 0.25 mm i.d., × 0.5 µm film thickness, J&W Scientific Inc., Folsom, CA, USA). The carrier gas was helium at a flow rate of 1.25 mL/min. The injection was made in the splitless mode, and the injector temperature was 250 °C. The column oven temperature was initially programmed from 100 °C to 300 °C at 10 °C/min, with a final holding time of 15 min. Spectra were recorded in the electron impact mode (ionization energy, 70 eV) in a range of 15–550 amu at 2.9 scans/s. A solvent delay time of 5 min was used. Each extract was analyzed in triplicate. Solvent controls were analyzed to check for interferences.
Straight-chained saturated alkanes were identified by their molecular ions and from comparisons of retention times and mass spectra with those of authentic standards. Methyl branched compounds were identified from their Kovats retention indices relative to straight chain hydrocarbons [46] in combination with diagnostic ions from enhanced fragmentations of methyl branch [47,48,49]. Unsaturated alkenes were identified by molecular weight, from retention times slightly shorter than those of the corresponding straight chain saturated alkanes, and their characteristic patterns of ions with masses two or four mass units less than the corresponding ions in the spectra of straight-chain alkanes, for monoenes and dienes, respectively [50].
Besides, comparison of MS fragmentation patterns with those included in the National Institute for Standards and Technology database (NIST 02, p > 80) were utilized to support tentative identification. The relative abundance of each compounds was calculated using the integrated peak area data from the GC-MS trace.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Antennal General Morphology

In both sexes, the antennae are morphologically similar: filiform, consisting of two basal segments (the scape and a short pedicel) and a long flagellum composed of nine flagellomeres (Figure 1 and Figure 2). Males present much longer antennae (mean length 56.4 ± 1.9 mm) than the females (mean length 30.1 ± 1.86 mm) due to the differences in the length from the fourth to the ninth flagellomere (Figure 1, arrows).
Each antenna presents two flat longitudinal bands, one on the ventral and one on the dorsal side, of variable size and facing the abaxial surface (Figure 2b, asterisks). Such bands are easily visible since they are delimitated by longitudinal strips devoid of any sensilla (Figure 2b asterisks). Six types of sensilla chaetica (SC1–6), one type of sensilla trichodea (ST1), four types of sensilla basiconica (SB1–4) and Böhm bristles (BB) were distinguished on the antennae on the base of their external morphology from SEM observations (according to Schneider [51]) (Table 1).
Where not indicated otherwise, type and distribution of the sensilla refer to both male and female.

3.2. Antennal Sensilla and Their Secretion Analysis

3.2.1. Sensilla Chaetica

They are the most common sensilla on the antennae and consist of a long hair-shaft set in an obvious flexible socket. The outer surface is sculptured by dense longitudinal grooves. Several types are distinguishable according to their hair-shaft size, shape of grooves, and their location. Most aporous sensilla chaetica with a flexible socket (SC1, SC2, SC4, SC5, and SC6) could be assumed to be mechanoreceptors involved in different kinds of activities.
SC1. These sensilla are slightly curved and lay parallel to the antennal surface pointing towards its tip (Figure 3a,c); they have a V-shaped deep grooved pattern on the shaft surface that ends in a sharp tip (Figure 3b). Their length (female 95.8 ± 39.9 µm; male 99.9 ± 28.8 µm) can be variable: from 45 µm (those present in the longitudinal bands of the antennae and covering sensilla basiconica), 120–130 µm (those elsewhere on the surface of the antennomeres) to 140 µm at the tip of the ninth flagellomere (Figure 3d,e). They are evenly distributed around the circumference of each antennomere (Figure 3a,c), except for a glabrous region devoid of any sensilla (Figure 2b), and cover the underlying sensilla basiconica. Thus, they may inform the insect of the different antennal contacts and protect the underlying basiconica.
SC2. They have longitudinally grooved bristles (female 233.9 ± 35.4 µm; male 225.2 ± 51.6 µm), are slightly tapered with pointed tips, located in an open articulating socket, and pointing toward the tip of the antennae (Figure 4a). They are distributed around the circumference of scape, pedicel and flagellomeres and easily distinguished from SC1 since they are longer and their straight shaft is slightly diverging from the antennal surface (Figure 3a and Figure 4b). Hence, they might be the first to contact the substrate during antennation and act as mechanoreceptors helping the insect in directing the antennae.
SC3. They are straight with a shaft raised from the antennal surface at an angle of about 45° and easily visible since they appear electron lucent (Figure 3a,c,d and Figure 5a). These sensilla present thin parallel grooves along their length (female 68.9 ± 9.5 µm; male 67.9 ± 15 µm) and blunt tips (compared to SC1) (Figure 5b). Considering their arrangement around the circumference of the antenna (Figure 3a,c), and among the distal tuft of setae (Figure 3d), the flexible socket, the shaft raised from the antenna surface and the blunt tip, they resemble uniporous gustatory sensilla acting as multimodal [52,53]. In fact, they might serve as contact chemoreceptors and could well be used to sense specific cuticular hydrocarbons, hence playing a role in mate recognition during courtship behavior. In fact, contact chemoreception has been shown to play an important role in mating behavior for several cerambycid species [15,21,25,26,27,54]. SC3 may also be sensitive to host plant cues since adults of both sexes regularly tap the surface of the substrate they are currently on.
SC4. These sensilla are very similar in appearance to SC1 but much longer (female 209.4 ± 50.6 µm; male 277.3 ± 84 µm). They are large, articulated bristles, with longitudinal grooves accumulating toward the tip (Figure 6a). They lay parallel to the surface pointing toward the tip of the antennae, are absent from the scape and pedicel, and occur on the distal region of the flagellomeres arranged in horizontal line (Figure 6b,c). Thus, they might act as proprioceptors stimulated by the change in the position of the adjacent segments (movements of the flagellomeres) or when the antennae are bent too far inwards and, hence, help retain the curved shape of the antennae.
SC5. These sensilla are very long (female 329.4 ± 35.2 µm; male 384.4 ± 82.3 µm) straight, stout with a grooved shaft (Figure 6d). They are absent from the scape and pedicel, while present in the 1st–6th flagellomere on the antennal dorsal side only. Considering their location, these sensilla might be involved as mechanoreceptors in the antennation observed in many cerambycid species during mating.
SC6. These sensilla have a very long shaft (female 367 ± 53.2 µm; male 411 ± 68.3 µm), thin, irregularly curved with longitudinal grooves and pointed tips (Figure 7). They are present only on the dorsal side of the flagellomeres 1st–5th in number of two-four, often arranged in a straight longitudinal line. They might respond to sounds or air currents, as suggested also by Dyer and Seabrook [44] and Faucheux [45]. Aromia is, in fact, known to be able to stridulate (personal observations), so such setae can work as sound as well as wind receptors.
Böhm bristle (BB). These are straight, or slightly curved, spine-shaped sensilla (female 64.8 ± 17 µm; male 62.5 ± 13 µm) inserted into well-developed cuticular sockets and showing sharp tips and smooth cuticle (Figure 8). According to their concentration in a dense group on the inter-segmental joints between the scape and the head (Figure 8a), as well as between the scape and the pedicel, and their wide articulated socket, they likely function as proprioceptors informing the insect of the antennal position and movements, as in many other groups of insects [51].

3.2.2. Sensilla Trichodea

They are much less common than the chaetica and characterized by a hair-shaft without a discrete membranous socket distinguishable at SEM.
ST1. These sensilla are thin with a grooved straight shaft (57.5 ± 4.4 µm long) parallel to the antenna and projecting from a raised base (Figure 9) with no evident articulation. They only occur in males and are located in the abaxial longitudinal bands of the first and second flagellomeres where they are closely packed with SC1, SC3, few SC2, and with sensilla basiconica (SB) (Figure 9a,b). On the first flagellomere ST1 are present only in the distal part of the bands. It was not possible to ascertain if their walls are provided with pores, while their base, hardly visible because covered by SC1, seems not provided with a flexible socket. Their function remains unclear.

3.2.3. Sensilla Basiconica

SB1. They are blunt-tipped, curved, relatively short sensilla (female 9.5 ± 1 µm; male 8.5 ± 0.7 µm). They present a smooth shaft, without longitudinal grooves, projecting from an elevated base without articulating socket (Figure 10a). They appear, sometimes, covered by abundant viscous material clogging the pores and condensing outside (Figure 10b,c).
SB2. These sensilla are thinner and longer than SB1 (female 20.3 ± 3.8 µm; male 18.1 ±3.3 µm); they have a sharper tip, a bent shaft emerging from an elevated socket, and smooth cuticle (Figure 10a). Sometimes they present some viscous material condensing outside their walls (Figure 10d).
Both in SB1 and SB2, detection of pores was highlighted by the thread-like secretion extruded by their walls.
SB3 (grooved peg sensilla). These sensilla are very short (female 5.9 ± 0.8 µm; male 5.3 ± 0.8 µm), smooth at the base with the distal half surrounded by finger-like projections (Figure 10e, arrow) tapering gradually to a blunt tip; they insert into a wide dome and present no articulating socket (Figure 10e). These sensilla are rare (three-six per article), in both males and females, and scattered among the other basiconic sensilla (SB1 and SB2) and sensilla chaetica SC1 and SC3.
SB4. They are short jointed sensilla raising from the same base, represented by a flattened wide dome, with no evident socket; they show a smooth shaft with blunt tip (Figure 10f,g). These sensilla were observed in males and females but, in both cases, just one sensillum was found located on the ventral side of the ninth flagellomere among other SB1 and 2 and SC1 (Figure 10f).
Sensilla basiconica SB1, SB2, and SB3 are present in all flagellomeres (thus absent in pedicel and scape), yet their distribution is patchy and they are mainly concentrated in the two lateral bands, one dorsal and one ventral, facing the abaxial surface of the antennae (Figure 2b and Figure 9a). In these zones, SB appear densely covered by a layer of closely packed SC1 (Figure 11a) together with a few SC3. Few basiconica are visible in the nearby zone close to these bands.
In females, these bands are thinner in the basal flagellomeres (1st–5th) while in the distal flagellomeres (7th–8th) they occupy almost half of the ventral and dorsal surface of the flagellomeres (Figure 2b) and in the ninth these bands cover the entire ventral and dorsal surface up to the distal tuft of setae (Figure 11b). Moreover, the distribution of SB inside these bands is patchy: the ninth flagellomere shows zones where SB are very dense and organized in gathered clusters (Figure 11b,c) with a peculiar distribution of SB1 and SB2, while in the other flagellomeres the concentration of SB is variable along the longitudinal bands but without clusters (Figure 11d,e).
In males, SB are also concentrated in the two lateral bands (Figure 12a), with few basiconica visible elsewhere outside these strips (Figure 12b). These bands do not cover the entire ventral and dorsal surface of the ninth flagellomere (Figure 12c) as in females. Moreover, SB do not reach the distal tuft of setae (Figure 3e) and do not show a cluster organization (Figure 12c). Regarding their distribution, as in female, SB concentration is not uniform in the areas where they are present (compare Figure 12a,d).
Sensilla basiconica are typical multiporous olfactory receptors that respond to odors [53,55,56,57,58,59,60]. We therefore hypothesize that the flagellar sensilla basiconica SB1 and SB2 play a role in odor perception. The presence of different SB types on almost all the surface of the distal flagellomeres might indicate these are the main areas devoted to detect different chemical signals. Moreover, their concentration in the lateral longitudinal bands along the abaxial surface of the antennae seems to be designed for improving the catching efficiency of olfactory stimuli while the organization in cluster of variable size appears to be common in Coleoptera and cerambycid species [44,45,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66]. It has been inferred that such olfactory sensilla clusters function as sensory fields representing an enlarged odor-sensing area that would be advantageous for long-distance olfactory detection [44,59,62]. In A. bungii, the sexual dimorphism of SB clustering (present only in female) might suggest that they are involved in detecting male sex pheromones, as suggested by Chen et al. [66] for males in Xylotrechus grayii (White, 1855).
Moreover, SB1 and SB2 present, quite often, in both males and females, an abundant and viscous thread-like secretion clogging the pores and condensing outside their walls; thus, these sensilla appear coated with solid curls or coiled ribbons (Figure 10b–d) suggesting the production of a secretion that appears to be non-volatile and accumulating on the antennal surface (Figure 10d, arrowheads).
In this respect, it is already reported the presence of glands associated with antennae and sensilla in Coleoptera and few other insect orders (e.g., [67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78]). In the family Cerambycidae, Dyer and Seabrook [44] observed that, in Monochamus notatus (Drury) and M. scutellatus (Say), the antennae are well supplied with dermal glands and flask-shaped glands opening near the base of different kind of sensilla. Moreover, in Phoracantha recurva (Newman, 1840), Faucheux [45] found holes associated with aporous sensilla, and Álvarez et al. [23], in another species of Monochamus, observed pore associated glands on the antennae. The possible function of the dermal glands on the antennae has been thought to be the secretion of the cement layer over the epicuticle after a molt while, for the glands associated with the sensilla, the secretion of cuticular hydrocarbons seems possible [23,44]. In addition, Dyer and Seabrook [44] and Faucheux [45] hypothesized that one of these two types of glands secretes a pheromone used in sex recognition. Nevertheless, as far as we know, secretions associated with sensilla basiconica have never previously been observed in any cerambycid species while they were observed once in pipunculid flies (Diptera) [78].
Remarkably, in few insect orders, it has been proved that several structures on the antennae are release sites of exocrine glands leading to the question if they are still sensilla or glands [69,74,75,78]. Moreover, antennation has been observed in several species in pre-copulatory and post-copulatory phase and, sometimes, correlated with the presence of peculiar antennal structures functioning as gland release sites. This discovery has profoundly changed the morpho-functional view of the antennae that can, hence, be involved in sex recognition, producing contact or volatile pheromones [69,70,72,79]. Behavioral studies of many species of long-horned beetles have confirmed that contact pheromones play an important role in reproduction: males appearing to recognize possible mates only after the antennae contact the antennae, or some other parts of the body, of the other conspecifics [15,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,80].
In this study, GC-MS analyses of the hexane extracts of male and female antennal secretions detected a total of 14 saturated and unsaturated aliphatic hydrocarbons, ranging in chain length from C23 to C31. Dominant compounds in the extract from males included C27 (Peak 7, Figure 13), 2-Me-C28 (Peak 9), C29 (Peak 11), and C31-monoene (Peak 14). The main components of the female extract were C25 (Peak 2), 2-Me-C26 (Peak 4), two C27-monoenes (Peaks 5 and 6), C27 (Peak 7), and 2-Me-C30 (Peak 13). Interestingly, some of these compounds have been previously reported as contact pheromone components of other cerambycid species [81]. Moreover, differences in the chemical composition of male and female antennal secretions were found. In fact, two compounds were specific to male, seven specific to female and seven in common to both sexes. Among the latter, remarkably, differences were found in the relative abundance of some compounds with the male extract having higher proportions of compounds with longer chain length (Figure 13 and Table 2), as observed in the longhorns Xylotrechus colonus (Fabricius, 1775) [30] and Megacyllene caryae (Gahan, 1908) [33]. Differences between the male and female cuticular hydrocarbon profiles have also been found in other cerambycid species and may result in different semiochemical functions ([82] and references therein). Based on this, one could speculate that, in Aromia, SB1 and SB2 might secrete a nonvolatile pheromone used for sex recognition.
According to Fukaya et al. [83], in A. bungii, male lure cages proved to be attractive to females that were induced to fly upwind by their presence. These results suggested that males release a long-range attractant signal received by females. Moreover, a male-produced sex-aggregation pheromone (sensu Cardé), was identified in A. bungii by Xu et al. [84]. Unfortunately, species within the tribe of Callichromini (subfamily Cerambycinae), including those of the genus Aromia, have not been sufficiently investigated in regard to their mating behavior. Thus, what we might assume is that males and females, as in other Cerambycidae [22,23,59], perceive host plant odors, and once on the host, males attract both sexes from some distance with aggregation pheromones and then recognize females by contact pheromones. If this is the case, antennae are not only receivers or various types of signals but also emitters of chemical messages and the sensilla basiconica (SB1 and SB2) might be the release sites.
Regarding SB3, they are grooved peg sensilla as observed in other beetle species and, based on their ultrastructure, their probable function is chemo- or thermoreception [53,58,60].
Finally, SB4 might represent a branched, extremely rare, variant of sensilla basiconica, as reported in M. notatus, by Dyer and Seabrook [44], and in Tetropium fuscum (Fabr.), by MacKay et al. [60]. They were interpreted as a morphological alteration due to stress during the development and hence not representing a distinct sensillar type. Nevertheless, it is worth noting that, in T. fuscum, such sensilla, as well as in Aromia, were observed only on the ninth flagellomere. Thus, it might be interesting to consider a single sensillum recording (SSR) to clarify functional aspects related to this sensillum type.
The external morphology of the antennal sensilla observed in A. bungii is similar to that described for other cerambycids [44,45,59,60,63,65,66,80] where sensilla chaetica, trichodea and basiconica are common, although with differences in the types; on the other hand, sensilla campaniformia and squamiformia have not been detected as opposed to Dai and Honda [63], Dyer and Seabrook [44] and Chen et al. [66].
To precisely ascertain the functions of the different sensilla, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) along with electrophysiological recordings must be conducted; moreover, single sensillum recording (SSR) will clarify the role of the different putative olfactory sensilla (SB1, SB2, SB3, and SB4) in processing pheromones, host, and non-host volatiles. Additionally, future ultrastructural observations with TEM, will likely confirm the presence of glands associated to basiconica sensilla in Aromia and help understanding the functional morphology of these glandular (?) sensilla. Moreover, behavioral bioassays are needed to clarify the biological activity of the compounds present in the male and female antennal secretions.

4. Conclusions

In our study, twelve different types of sensilla were morphologically described on the antennae of A. bungii using SEM. At least six mechanoreceptors—one gustative, one putative chemo- or thermoreceptor, and two multiporous olfactory receptors—are present on the antennae of both sexes while an additional receptor-type of unclear function is limited to males. From an olfactory perspective, the most interesting type of sensilla is the small basiconica playing a role in detecting volatiles. Moreover, secretions associated with sensilla basiconica were described for the first time in a cerambycid species. In particular, two types of sensilla basiconica produce a viscous thread-like material that accumulates on the antennal surface. The GC-MS analyses of the hexane extracts of the adult antennal secretions highlighted marked differences between sexes in the number and relative abundance of compounds. Moreover, since some of the identified compounds have been previously reported as contact pheromone components of other cerambycid species, SB1 and SB2 might the release sites of a nonvolatile pheromone used for mate recognition. This study provides a base for future investigations aiming at the development of semiochemical-based control means of this pest.

Author Contributions

Specimen collection and identification, A.P.G. and R.G.; scanning electron microscopy preparation and investigation, A.D.P.; antennal secretion extracts preparation and analysis, G.S.G. and M.P.; conceptualization and writing—original draft preparation, A.D.P. and G.S.G.; and writing—review and editing, A.D.P., G.S.G. and A.P.G.

Funding

This research was funded by Campania Region, grant number Accordo di collaborazione No. 14 del 20.060.2012. “Published with a contribution from 5 × 1000 IRPEF funds in favour of the University of Foggia, in memory of Gianluca Montel”.

Acknowledgments

We thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Smith, J.W. NPAG Report: Aromia bungii (Faldermann): Redneck Longhorned Beetle Coleoptera/Cerambycidae; New Pest Advisory Group (NPAG), Plant Epidemiology and Risk Analysis Laboratory, Center for Plant Health Science & Technology, APHIS, USDA: Washington, DC, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ostojá-Starzewski, J.O.; Baker, R.H.A. Red-necked Longhorn: Aromia bungii. Plant Pest Factsheet. FERA. 2012. Available online: http://www.fera.defra.gov.uk/plants/publications/documents/factsheets/aromiaBungii.pdf (accessed on 10 December 2018).
  3. EPPO. First Report of Aromia bungii in Germany: Addition to the EPPO Alert List. EPPO Reporting Service, September 2012. [Google Scholar]
  4. Burmeister, E.G. Der asiatische moschusbock in Bayern ausgerottet!? Ein Kafer, neu fur Deutschland, im Paragraphendschungel (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae, Aromia bungii (Faldermann, 1835)). Nachrichtenbl. Bayer. Entomol. 2012, 61, 80–82. (In German) [Google Scholar]
  5. Schrader, G.; Schröder, T. Express PRA for Aromia bungii; Vogt-Arndt, E., Translator; Institut fur Nationale und International Angelegenheiten der Pflanzengesundheit: Braunschweig, Germany, 2012; 7p. [Google Scholar]
  6. Garonna, A.P. Aromia bungii: Un Nuovo Fitofago delle Drupacee in Campania. Seminario-Workshop: Nuovi Pericolosi Insetti di Recente Introduzione in Campania. 27 November 2012. Available online: http://www.agricoltura.regione.campania.it/difesa/files/aromia_garonna.pdf (accessed on 7 December 2018). (In Italian).
  7. EPPO. First Report of Aromia bungii in Italy. EPPO Reporting Service, 1 October 2012. [Google Scholar]
  8. EPPO. Aromia bungii Found for the First Time in Lombardia Region, Italy. EPPO Reporting Service, September 2013. [Google Scholar]
  9. Garonna, A.P.; Nugnes, F.; Epinosa, B.; Griffo, R.; Benchi, D. Aromia bungii, nuovo tarlo asiatico ritrovato in Camapania [Aromia bungii, a new Asian worm found in Campania]. Inf. Agrar. 2013, 69, 60–62. (In Italian) [Google Scholar]
  10. Cocquempot, C. Aromia bungii. EPPO datasheet on pests recommended for regulation. EPPO Bull. 2015, 45, 4–8. [Google Scholar]
  11. EPPO. PRA for Aromia bungii. EPPO, September 2014. [Google Scholar]
  12. European Union. Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1503 of 8 October 2018 as regards measures to prevent the introduction into and the spread within the Union of Aromia bungii (Faldermann). Off. J. Eur. Union 2018, L 254, 9–18. [Google Scholar]
  13. Hansson, B.S.; Stensmyr, M.C. Evolution of insect olfaction. Neuron 2011, 72, 698–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Iwabuchi, K. Mating Behavior of Xylotrechus pyrrhoderus BATES (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) I. Behavioral sequences and existence of the male sex pheromone. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 1982, 17, 494–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Iwabuchi, K. Mating behavior of Xylotrechus pyrrhoderus Bates (Coleoptera; Cerambycidae) II. Female recognition by male and existence of a female sex pheromone. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 1985, 20, 416–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Iwabuchi, K. Mating behavior of Xylotrechus pyrrhoderus Bates (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) III. Pheromone secretion by male. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 1986, 21, 606–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Iwabuchi, K. Mating behavior of Xylotrechus pyrrhoderus Bates (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). VI mating system. J. Ethol. 1988, 6, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, Q.; Li, J.; Zeng, W.; Yin, X. Sex recognition by males and evidence for a female sex pheromone in Paraglenea fortunei (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 1991, 84, 107–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hanks, L.M. Influence of the larval host plant on the reproductive strategies of cerambycid beetles. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1999, 44, 483–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Reagel, P.F.; Ginzel, M.D.; Hanks, L.M. Aggregation and mate location in the red milkweed beetle (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). J. Insect Behav. 2002, 15, 811–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Allison, J.D.; Borden, J.H.; Seybold, S.J. A review of the chemical ecology of the Cerambycidae (Coleoptera). Chemoecology 2004, 14, 123–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ginzel, M.D.; Hanks, L.M. Role of host plant volatiles in mate location for three species of longhorned beetles. J. Chem. Ecol. 2005, 31, 213–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Álvarez, G.; Ammagarahalli, B.; Hall, D.R.; Pajares, J.A.; Gemeno, C. Smoke, pheromone and kairomone olfactory receptor neurons in males and females of the pine sawyer Monochamus galloprovincialis (Olivier) (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). J. Insect Physiol. 2015, 82, 46–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Collignon, R.M.; Swift, I.P.; Zou, Y.; McElfresh, J.S.; Hanks, L.M.; Millar, J.G. The influence of host plant volatiles on the attraction of longhorn beetles to pheromones. J. Chem. Ecol. 2016, 42, 215–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kuboki, M.; Akutsu, K.; Sakai, A.; Chuman, T. Bioassay of the sex pheromone of the udo longicorn beetle, Acalolepta luxuriosa Bates (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Appl. Entomol. Zool. 1985, 20, 88–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Fauziah, B.A.; Tabata, K.; Ito, K.; Takahashi, S.; Hidaka, T. Mating behavior of the cryptomeria bark borer, Semanotus japonicus Lacordaire (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Appl. Entomol. Zool. 1992, 27, 19–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Fukaya, M.; Honda, H. Reproductive biology of the yellow-spotted longicorn beetle, Psacothea hilaris (Pascoe) (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) I. Male mating behaviors and female sex pheromones. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 1992, 27, 89–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hanks, L.M.; Millar, J.G.; Paine, T.D. Mating behavior of the eucalyptus longhorned borer (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) and the adaptive significance of long “horns”. J. Insect Behav. 1996, 9, 383–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ginzel, M.D.; Hanks, L.M. Contact pheromones as mate recognition cues of four species of longhorned beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). J. Insect Behav. 2003, 16, 181–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ginzel, M.D.; Blomquist, G.J.; Millar, J.G.; Hanks, L.M. Role of contact pheromones in mate recognition in Xylotrechus colonus. J. Chem. Ecol. 2003, 29, 533–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Ginzel, M.D.; Millar, J.G.; Hanks, L.M. Z9-pentacosene-contact sex pheromone of the locust borer Megacyllene robinae. Chemoecology 2003, 13, 135–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhang, A.; Oliver, J.E.; Chauhan, K.; Zhao, B.; Xia, L.; Xu, Z. Evidence for contact sex recognition pheromone of the Asian longhorned beetle, Anoplophora glabripennis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Naturwissenschaften 2003, 90, 410–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Ginzel, M.D.; Moreira, J.A.; Ray, A.M.; Millar, J.G.; Hanks, L.M. (Z)-9-Nonacosene-major component of the contact sex pheromone of the beetle Megacyllene caryae. J. Chem. Ecol. 2006, 32, 435–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kim, M.-K.; Kim, J.-S.; Hant, J.-H.; Kim, Y.-J.; Yoon, C.; Kim, G.-H. Mating behavior of pine sawyer, Monochamus saltuarius Gebler (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). J. Asia-Pac. Entomol. 2006, 9, 275–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lu, W.; Wang, Q.; Tian, M.Y.; He, X.Z.; Zeng, X.L.; Zhong, Y.X. Mate location and recognition in Glenea cantor (Fabr.) (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Lamiinae): Roles of host plant health, female sex pheromone, and vision. Environ. Entomol. 2007, 36, 864–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ibeas, F.; Díez, J.J.; Pajares, J.A. Olfactory sex attraction and mating behaviour in the pine sawyer Monochamus galloprovincialis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). J. Insect Behav. 2008, 21, 101–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lacey, E.S.; Ginzel, M.D.; Millar, J.G.; Hanks, L.M. 7-Methylheptacosane is a major component of the contact sex pheromone of the cerambycid beetle Neoclytus acuminatus acuminatus. Physiol. Entomol. 2008, 33, 209–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Fonseca, M.G.; Zarbin, P.H.G. Mating behaviour and evidence for sex-specific pheromones in Hedypathes betulinus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Lamiinae). J. Appl. Entomol. 2009, 133, 695–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Rutledge, C.E.; Millar, J.G.; Romero, C.M.; Hanks, L.M. Identification of an important component of the contact sex pheromone of Callidiellum rufipenne (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Environ. Entomol. 2009, 38, 1267–1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Luo, S.-L.; Zhuge, P.-P.; Wang, M.-Q. Mating behavior and contact pheromones of Batocera horsfieldi (Hope) (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Entomol. Sci. 2011, 14, 359–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Silk, P.J.; Sweeney, J.; Wu, J.; Sopow, S.; Mayo, P.D.; Magee, D. Contact sex pheromones identified for two species of longhorned beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) Tetropium fuscum and T. cinnamopterum in the Subfamily Spondylidinae. Environ. Entomol. 2011, 40, 714–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Lopes, O.; Marques, P.C.; Araújo, J. The Role of Antennae in Mate Recognition in Phoracantha semipunctata (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Insect Behav. 2005, 18, 243–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hughes, G.P.; Spikes, A.E.; Holland, J.D.; Ginzel, M.D. Evidence for the stratification of hydrocarbons in the epicuticular wax layer of female Megacyllene robiniae (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Chemoecology 2011, 21, 99–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Dyer, L.J.; Seabrook, W.D. Sensilla on the antennal flagellum of the sawyer beetles Monochamus notatus (Drury) and Monochamus scutellatus (Say) (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). J. Morphol. 1975, 146, 513–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Faucheux, M.J. Antennal sensilla of the yellow longicorn beetle Phoracantha recurva Newman, 1840: Distribution and comparison with Phoracantha semipunctata (Fabricius, 1775) (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Bull. Inst. Sci. 2011, 33, 19–29. [Google Scholar]
  46. Kovats, E. Characterization of organic compounds by gas chromatography. Part 1. Retention indices of aliphatic halides, alcohols, aldehydes and ketones. Helv. Chim. Acta 1958, 41, 1915–1932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Nelson, D.R. Methyl-branched lipids in insects. In Insect Lipids: Chemistry, Biochemistry, and Biology; Stanley-Samuelson, D.W., Nelson, D.R., Eds.; University of Nebraska Press: Lincoln, NE, USA, 1993; pp. 271–315. [Google Scholar]
  48. Carlson, D.A.; Bernier, R.U.; Sutton, B.D. Elution patterns from capillary GC for methyl-branched alkanes. J. Chem. Ecol. 1998, 24, 1845–1865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Guédot, C.; Millar, J.G.; Horton, D.R.; Landolt, P.J. Identification of a sex attractant pheromone for male winter form pear psylla, Cacopsylla pyricola. J. Chem. Ecol. 2009, 35, 1437–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mullen, S.P.; Millar, J.G.; Schal, C.; Shaw, K.L. Identification and characterization of cuticular hydrocarbons from a rapid species radiation of Hawaiian swordtailed crickets (Gryllidae: Trigonidiinae: Laupala). J. Chem. Ecol. 2008, 34, 198–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Schneider, D. Insect antennae. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1964, 9, 103–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. McIver, S.B. Structure of cuticular mechanoreceptors of arthropods. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1975, 20, 381–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Altner, H.; Prillinger, L. Ultrastructure of invertebrate chemo-, thermo-, and hygroreceptors and its functional significance. Int. Rev. Cytol. 1980, 67, 69–139. [Google Scholar]
  54. Akutsu, K.; Kuboki, M. Analysis of mating behavior of udo longicorn beetle, Acalolepta luxuriosa Bates (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Jpn. J. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 1983, 27, 247–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Slifer, E.H. The structure of Arthropod chemoreceptors. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1970, 15, 121–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Keil, T.A.; Steinbrecht, R.A. Mechanosensitive and olfactory sensilla of insects. In Insect Ultrastructure; King, R.C., Akai, H., Eds.; Plenum Press: New York, NY, USA, 1984; Volume 25, pp. 477–516. [Google Scholar]
  57. Zacharuk, R.Y. Ultrastructure and function of insect chemosensilla. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1980, 25, 27–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zacharuk, R.Y. Antennae and sensilla. In Comprehensive Insect Physiology Biochemistry and Pharmacology. Nervous System: Sensory; Kerkut, G.A., Gilbert, L.I., Eds.; Pergamon Press: Oxford, UK, 1985; pp. 1–69. [Google Scholar]
  59. Lopes, O.; Barata, E.N.; Mustaparta, H.; Araúyo, J. Fine structure of antennal sensilla basiconica and their detection of plant volatiles in the eucalyptus woodborer, Phoracantha semipunctata Fabricius (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Arthropod Struct. Dev. 2002, 31, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. MacKay, C.A.; Sweeney, J.D.; Hillier, N.K. Morphology of antennal sensilla of the brown spruce longhorn beetle, Tetropium fuscum (Fabr.) (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Arthropod Struct. Dev. 2014, 43, 469–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Smith, C.M.; Frazier, J.L.; Coons, L.B.; Knight, W.E. Antennal sensilla of the clover head weevil Hypera Meles (F.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Int. J. Insect Morphol. Embryol. 1976, 5, 349–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Inouchi, J.; Shibuya, T.; Matsuzaki, O.; Hatanaka, T. Distribution and fine structure of antennal olfactory sensilla in Japanese dung beetles, Geotrupes auratus Mtos. (Coleoptera: Geotrupidae) and Copris pecuarius Lew. (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Int. J. Insect Morphol. Embryol. 1987, 16, 177–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Dai, H.-G.; Honda, H. Sensilla on the antennal flagellum of the yellow spotted longicorn beetle, Psacothea hilaris (Pascoe) (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Appl. Entomol. Zool. 1990, 25, 273–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Ritcey, G.M.; Mciver, S.B. External morphology of antennal sensilla of four species of adult flea beetles (Coleoptera:Chrysomelidae:Alticinae). Int. J. Insect Morphol. Embryol. 1990, 19, 141–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Zhang, J.; Guan, L.; Ren, B. Fine structure and distribution of antennal sensilla of longicorn beetles Leptura arcuata and Leptura aethiops (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2011, 104, 778–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Chen, J.-M.; Qiao, H.-L.; Chen, J.; Xu, C.-Q.; Liu, S.; Lian, Z.-M.; Guo, K. Observation of antennal sensilla in Xylotrechus grayii (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) with scanning electron microscopy. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2014, 77, 264–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. De Marzo, L.; Vit, S. Contributo alla conoscenza delle Batrisinae paleartiche (Coleoptera, Pselaphidae). Le ghiandole antennali nei maschi di Batrisus Aubè e Batrisoides Reitter: Variazioni morfologiche, istologia e valore tassonomico. Entomologica 1983, XVIII, 77–110. [Google Scholar]
  68. Bin, F.; Vinson, S.B. Morphology of the antennal sex-gland in male Trissolcus basalis (Woll.) (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae), an egg parasitoid of the green stink bug, Nezara viridula (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Int. J. Insect Morphol. Embryol. 1986, 15, 129–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Bin, F.; Colazza, S.; Isidoro, N.; Solinas, M.; Vinson, S.B. Antennal chemosensilla and glands, and their possible meaning in the reproductive behaviour of Trissolcus basalis (Woll.) (Hym.: Scelionidae). Entomologica 1989, 30, 33–97. [Google Scholar]
  70. Bartlet, E.; Isidoro, N.; Williams, I.H. Antennal glands in Psylliodes chrysocephala, and their possible role in reproductive behaviour. Physiol. Entomol. 1994, 19, 241–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Skilbeck, C.A.; Anderson, M. The fine structure of glandular units on the antennae of two species of the parasitoid Aleochara (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae). Int. J. Insect Morphol. Embryol. 1994, 23, 319–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Isidoro, N.; Bin, F. Male antennal gland of Amitus spiniferus (Brethes) (Hymenoptera: Platygastridae) likely involved in courtship behavior. Int. J. Insect Morphol. Embryol. 1995, 24, 365–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Isidoro, N.; Bin, F.; Colazza, S.; Vinson, S.B. Morphology of antennal gustatory sensilla and glands in some parasitoids Hymenoptera with hypothesis on their role in sex and host recognition. J. Hymenopt. Res. 1996, 5, 206–239. [Google Scholar]
  74. Isidoro, N.; Romani, R.; Bin, F. Antennal multiporous sensilla; their gustatory features for host recognition in female wasps (Insecta, Hymenoptera: Platygastroidea). Microsc. Res. Tech. 2001, 55, 350–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Bin, F.; Isidoro, N.; Romani, R. Antennal structures of Hymenoptera: Sensilla or glands? Atti dell’Accademia Nazionale Italiana di Entomologia. Rendiconti 1999, XLVIII, 251–263. [Google Scholar]
  76. Weis, A.; Schonitzer, K.; Melzer, R.R. Exocrine glands in the antennae of the carabid beetle, Platynus assimilis (Paykull) (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Pterostichinae). I. Int. J. Insect Morphol. Embryol. 1999, 28, 311–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Giglio, A.; Ferrero, E.A.; Brandmayr, T.Z. Ultrastructural identification of the antennal gland complement in Siagona europaea Dejean 1826, a myrmecophagous carabid beetle. Acta Zool. 2005, 86, 195–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Belcari, A.; Kozánek, M. Secretory material from antennal organs and its possible role in mating behaviour of Pipunculidae (Diptera). Can. J. Zool. 2006, 84, 1727–1732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Romani, R.; Rosi, M.C.; Isidoro, N.; Bin, F. The role of the antennae during courtship behaviour in the parasitic wasp Trichopria drosophilae. J. Exp. Biol. 2008, 211, 2486–2491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Crook, D.J.; Higgins, R.A.; Ramaswamy, S.B. Antennal morphology of the soybean stemborer Dectes texanus texanus LeConte (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 2003, 76, 397–405. [Google Scholar]
  81. El-Sayed, A.M. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. 2018. Available online: http://www.pherobase.com (accessed on 6 December 2018).
  82. Ginzel, M.D. Hydrocarbons as contact pheromones of longhorned beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). In Insect Hydrocarbons; Blomquist, G.J., Bagneres, A.G., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2010; pp. 375–389. [Google Scholar]
  83. Fukaya, M.; Kiriyama, S.; Yasui, H. Mate-location flight of the red-necked longicorn beetle, Aromia bungii (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae): An invasive pest lethal to Rosaceae trees. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 2017, 52, 559–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Xu, T.; Yasui, H.; Teale, S.A.; Fujiwara-Tsujii, N.; Wickham, J.D.; Fukaya, M.; Hansen, L.; Kiriyama, S.; Hao, D.; Nakano, A.; et al. Identification of a male-produced sex-aggregation pheromone for a highly invasive cerambycid beetle, Aromia bungii. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 7330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Insects 10 00088 g001 550
Figure 1. A. bungii, LM general overview: male (a) and female (b). Arrows point to the 4th–9th flagellomeres to show length differences between sexes. Scale bar: 1 cm.
Figure 1. A. bungii, LM general overview: male (a) and female (b). Arrows point to the 4th–9th flagellomeres to show length differences between sexes. Scale bar: 1 cm.
Insects 10 00088 g001
Insects 10 00088 g002 550
Figure 2. A. bungii, SEM. Overview of the female antennae: (a) dorsal view, left antenna; and (b) ventral view, left antenna (asterisks indicate the flat longitudinal bands facing the abaxial surface). Abbreviations: F1–F9, flagellomere 1st–9th; Pe, pedicel; Sc, scape; Scale bars, 1 mm.
Figure 2. A. bungii, SEM. Overview of the female antennae: (a) dorsal view, left antenna; and (b) ventral view, left antenna (asterisks indicate the flat longitudinal bands facing the abaxial surface). Abbreviations: F1–F9, flagellomere 1st–9th; Pe, pedicel; Sc, scape; Scale bars, 1 mm.
Insects 10 00088 g002
Insects 10 00088 g003 550
Figure 3. A. bungii, SEM. Sensilla chaetica SC1. (a) Overview of SC1 on the female second flagellomere. (b) Detail of the V-shaped grooved pattern on the shaft surface and the sharp tip. (c) View of the even distribution around the circumference of the female antennomeres. SC1 on the tip of ninth flagellomere in female (d) and male (e). Abbreviations: SC1, sensillum chaeticum type 1; SC2, sensillum chaeticum type 2; SC3, sensillum chaeticum type 3. Scale bars: 100 µm (a,d,e); 30 µm (b); and 200 µm (C).
Figure 3. A. bungii, SEM. Sensilla chaetica SC1. (a) Overview of SC1 on the female second flagellomere. (b) Detail of the V-shaped grooved pattern on the shaft surface and the sharp tip. (c) View of the even distribution around the circumference of the female antennomeres. SC1 on the tip of ninth flagellomere in female (d) and male (e). Abbreviations: SC1, sensillum chaeticum type 1; SC2, sensillum chaeticum type 2; SC3, sensillum chaeticum type 3. Scale bars: 100 µm (a,d,e); 30 µm (b); and 200 µm (C).
Insects 10 00088 g003
Insects 10 00088 g004 550
Figure 4. A. bungii, male, SEM. Sensilla chaetica SC2. (a) Detail of the grooved bristle with articulated socket. (b) Overview of the third flagellomere showing SC2 easily distinguished from SC1 by their longer shaft slightly diverging from the antennal surface. Abbreviations: SC1, sensillum chaeticum type 1; SC2, sensillum chaeticum type 2; SC3, sensillum chaeticum type 3. Scale bars: 50 µm (a); and 300 µm (b).
Figure 4. A. bungii, male, SEM. Sensilla chaetica SC2. (a) Detail of the grooved bristle with articulated socket. (b) Overview of the third flagellomere showing SC2 easily distinguished from SC1 by their longer shaft slightly diverging from the antennal surface. Abbreviations: SC1, sensillum chaeticum type 1; SC2, sensillum chaeticum type 2; SC3, sensillum chaeticum type 3. Scale bars: 50 µm (a); and 300 µm (b).
Insects 10 00088 g004
Insects 10 00088 g005 550
Figure 5. A. bungii, SEM. Sensilla chaetica SC3. (a) Female: Two SC3 with several SC1 and some SB (different types). (b) Male: Detail of one SC3 with thin parallel grooves and blunt tip (compared to SC1). SC1, sensillum chaeticum type 1; SC3, sensillum chaeticum type 3; SB, sensilla basiconica. Scale bars: 50 µm (a); and 30 µm (b).
Figure 5. A. bungii, SEM. Sensilla chaetica SC3. (a) Female: Two SC3 with several SC1 and some SB (different types). (b) Male: Detail of one SC3 with thin parallel grooves and blunt tip (compared to SC1). SC1, sensillum chaeticum type 1; SC3, sensillum chaeticum type 3; SB, sensilla basiconica. Scale bars: 50 µm (a); and 30 µm (b).
Insects 10 00088 g005
Insects 10 00088 g006 550
Figure 6. A. bungii female, SEM. Sensilla chaetica SC4 and SC5. (a) Details of SC4: Articulated bristles, with longitudinal grooves. (b,c) Several SC4 arranged in horizontal line on the distal region of the flagellomeres. (d) SC5 provided with long, straight, grooved shafts. Abbreviations: SC1, sensillum chaeticum type 1; SC2, sensillum chaeticum type 2; SC4, sensillum chaeticum type 4; SC5, sensillum chaeticum type 5. Scale bars: 50 µm (a); 100 µm (b); and 150 µm (c,d).
Figure 6. A. bungii female, SEM. Sensilla chaetica SC4 and SC5. (a) Details of SC4: Articulated bristles, with longitudinal grooves. (b,c) Several SC4 arranged in horizontal line on the distal region of the flagellomeres. (d) SC5 provided with long, straight, grooved shafts. Abbreviations: SC1, sensillum chaeticum type 1; SC2, sensillum chaeticum type 2; SC4, sensillum chaeticum type 4; SC5, sensillum chaeticum type 5. Scale bars: 50 µm (a); 100 µm (b); and 150 µm (c,d).
Insects 10 00088 g006
Insects 10 00088 g007 550
Figure 7. A. bungii, SEM. Sensilla chaetica SC6. (a) Female: Detail of one SC6 with a very long, thin shaft provided with longitudinal grooves and pointed tips. (b) SC6 in male. Abbreviations: SC1, sensillum chaeticum type 1; SC2, sensillum chaeticum type 2; SC6, sensillum chaeticum type 6. Scale bars: 100 µm.
Figure 7. A. bungii, SEM. Sensilla chaetica SC6. (a) Female: Detail of one SC6 with a very long, thin shaft provided with longitudinal grooves and pointed tips. (b) SC6 in male. Abbreviations: SC1, sensillum chaeticum type 1; SC2, sensillum chaeticum type 2; SC6, sensillum chaeticum type 6. Scale bars: 100 µm.
Insects 10 00088 g007
Insects 10 00088 g008 550
Figure 8. A. bungii female antenna at the level between head and scape, SEM. (a) Böhm bristles: Spine-shaped sensilla inserted into well-developed cuticular sockets. (b) Detail of the sharp tips and smooth cuticle. Abbreviations: BB, Böhm bristle. Scale bars: 150 µm (a); and 25 µm (b).
Figure 8. A. bungii female antenna at the level between head and scape, SEM. (a) Böhm bristles: Spine-shaped sensilla inserted into well-developed cuticular sockets. (b) Detail of the sharp tips and smooth cuticle. Abbreviations: BB, Böhm bristle. Scale bars: 150 µm (a); and 25 µm (b).
Insects 10 00088 g008
Insects 10 00088 g009 550
Figure 9. A. bungii male, SEM. (a) Overview of the second flagellomere with the two longitudinal bands facing the abaxial surface and separated by a longitudinal strip devoid of any sensilla (arrowheads). Such bands are packed with SC1, SC2, SB and ST1. (b) Detail of ST1 showing a thin straight shaft projecting from a raised base with no evident articulation. Abbreviations: SC2, sensillum chaeticum type 2; ST1, sensillum trichodeum type 1. Scale bars: 500 µm (a); and 100 µm (b).
Figure 9. A. bungii male, SEM. (a) Overview of the second flagellomere with the two longitudinal bands facing the abaxial surface and separated by a longitudinal strip devoid of any sensilla (arrowheads). Such bands are packed with SC1, SC2, SB and ST1. (b) Detail of ST1 showing a thin straight shaft projecting from a raised base with no evident articulation. Abbreviations: SC2, sensillum chaeticum type 2; ST1, sensillum trichodeum type 1. Scale bars: 500 µm (a); and 100 µm (b).
Insects 10 00088 g009
Insects 10 00088 g010 550
Figure 10. A. bungii, SEM. Sensilla basiconica. (a) Female: SB1 and SB2. (b) Detail of one SB1 covered by abundant viscous material condensing outside in female and (c) male (arrows). (d) Male: Detail of two SB2 with some viscous material condensing outside their walls (arrows) and on the antennal surface (arrowheads). (e) Male: Detail of one SB3 with smooth base and distal finger-like projections (arrow). (f) Male: Overview of one SB4 (circle) visible among several SC1 and few SB2. (g) Male: Detail of SB4 represented by two jointed sensilla raising from the same base. Abbreviations: SB1, sensillum basiconicum type 1; SB2, sensillum basiconicum type 2; SB3, sensillum basiconicum type 3; SB4, sensillum basiconicum type 4; SC1, sensillum chaeticum type 1; SC3, sensillum chaeticum type 3. Scale bars: 10 µm (a,b,d); 5 µm (c,e,g); and 50 µm (f).
Figure 10. A. bungii, SEM. Sensilla basiconica. (a) Female: SB1 and SB2. (b) Detail of one SB1 covered by abundant viscous material condensing outside in female and (c) male (arrows). (d) Male: Detail of two SB2 with some viscous material condensing outside their walls (arrows) and on the antennal surface (arrowheads). (e) Male: Detail of one SB3 with smooth base and distal finger-like projections (arrow). (f) Male: Overview of one SB4 (circle) visible among several SC1 and few SB2. (g) Male: Detail of SB4 represented by two jointed sensilla raising from the same base. Abbreviations: SB1, sensillum basiconicum type 1; SB2, sensillum basiconicum type 2; SB3, sensillum basiconicum type 3; SB4, sensillum basiconicum type 4; SC1, sensillum chaeticum type 1; SC3, sensillum chaeticum type 3. Scale bars: 10 µm (a,b,d); 5 µm (c,e,g); and 50 µm (f).
Insects 10 00088 g010
Insects 10 00088 g011 550
Figure 11. A. bungii female, SEM. Sensilla basiconica. (a) SB1 and SB2 densely covered by closely packed SC1. (b) Ventro-dorsal view of the ninth flagellomere showing the two bands densely covered by SB, SC and separated by a glabrous strip (arrows). (c) Detail of the previous one showing SB organized in very gathered clusters (circle). (d,e) Variable concentration of SB along the longitudinal bands. Abbreviations: SB, sensillum basiconicum; SC1, sensillum chaeticum type 1. Scale bars: 50 µm (a); 300 µm (b); and 100 µm (c,e).
Figure 11. A. bungii female, SEM. Sensilla basiconica. (a) SB1 and SB2 densely covered by closely packed SC1. (b) Ventro-dorsal view of the ninth flagellomere showing the two bands densely covered by SB, SC and separated by a glabrous strip (arrows). (c) Detail of the previous one showing SB organized in very gathered clusters (circle). (d,e) Variable concentration of SB along the longitudinal bands. Abbreviations: SB, sensillum basiconicum; SC1, sensillum chaeticum type 1. Scale bars: 50 µm (a); 300 µm (b); and 100 µm (c,e).
Insects 10 00088 g011
Insects 10 00088 g012 550
Figure 12. A. bungii male, SEM. Sensilla basiconica. (a) Numerous SB1 and SB2 concentrated in one lateral band. (b) Detail of few SB visible elsewhere outside the lateral bands. (c) Ventral view of the ninth flagellomere with a few basiconica not covering the entire surface as in females. (d) Overview of few SB in the basal region of a flagellomere showing a lower concentration compared with A. Abbreviations: SB, sensillum basiconicum. Scale bars: 50 µm (a,c); and 100 µm (b,d).
Figure 12. A. bungii male, SEM. Sensilla basiconica. (a) Numerous SB1 and SB2 concentrated in one lateral band. (b) Detail of few SB visible elsewhere outside the lateral bands. (c) Ventral view of the ninth flagellomere with a few basiconica not covering the entire surface as in females. (d) Overview of few SB in the basal region of a flagellomere showing a lower concentration compared with A. Abbreviations: SB, sensillum basiconicum. Scale bars: 50 µm (a,c); and 100 µm (b,d).
Insects 10 00088 g012
Insects 10 00088 g013 550
Figure 13. Gas chromatogram profiles of solvent extracts of A. bungii antennal secretions: female (top) versus male (bottom, inverted).
Figure 13. Gas chromatogram profiles of solvent extracts of A. bungii antennal secretions: female (top) versus male (bottom, inverted).
Insects 10 00088 g013
Table
Table 1. Types of sensilla observed on the antennae of A. bungii.
Table 1. Types of sensilla observed on the antennae of A. bungii.
Sensillum TypeLocationLengthShaft AspectAngleTips
SC1Evenly distributed around the circumference of each antennomereVariable from 45 µm to 140 µmV-shaped groovesParallel to the antennal surfaceSharp
SC2Around the circumference of scape, pedicel and flagellomeresfemale 233.9 ± 35.4 µm;
male 225.2 ± 51.6 µm		Longitudinal groovesShaft slightly diverging from the antennal surfaceTapering
SC3Around the circumference of flagellomeres and among the distal tuft of setaefemale 68.9 ± 9.5 µm;
male 67.9 ± 15 µm		Thin parallel groovesShaft at an angle of about 45° on the antennal surfaceBlunt
SC4Arranged in a horizontal line on the distal region of the flagellomeresfemale 209.4 ± 50.6 µm;
male 277.3 ± 84 µm		Longitudinal grooves converging towards the tipsParallel to the antennal surfaceSharp
SC5Dorsal side of the flagellomeres 1st–6thfemale 329.4 ± 35.2 µm;
male 384.4 ± 82.3 µm		Longitudinal groovesShaft diverging from the antennal surfaceTapering
SC6Dorsal side of flagellomeres 1st–5thfemale 367 ± 53.2 µm;
male 411 ± 68.3 µm		Longitudinal groovesShaft irregularly curvedPointed
BBIn groups between the scape and the head and between the scape and the pedicelfemale 64.8 ± 17 µm;
male 62.5 ± 13 µm		Smooth cuticleAlmost perpendicular to the antennal surfaceSharp
ST1Present only in males on the 1st and 2nd flagellomeres57.5 ± 4.4 µmGrooved straight shaftParallel to the antennal surfacePointed
SB1Present in all flagellomeres concentrated in two lateral bandsfemale 9.5 ± 1 µm;
male 8.5 ± 0.7 µm		Curved, smoothArising from an elevated baseBlunt-tipped
SB2Present in all flagellomeres concentrated in two lateral bandsfemale 20.3 ± 3.8 µm;
male 18.1 ± 3.3 µm		Thin, bent shaft with smooth surfaceEmerging from an elevated socketPointed
SB3Few, scattered among SB1 and SB2female 5.9 ± 0.8 µm;
male 5.3 ± 0.8 µm		Smooth at the base, finger like-structures at the tipInsert into a wide domeBlunt
SB41 sensillum ventral side of the 9th flagellomere Smooth shaftRaising from a common baseJointed sensilla with blunt tip
Table
Table 2. Antennal secretion hydrocarbons of male and female A. bungii.
Table 2. Antennal secretion hydrocarbons of male and female A. bungii.
Peak No.HydrocarbonPercent of Total Hydrocarbons ± S.E. 1Diagnostic Ions
MaleFemale
19:C23N.D. 21.69 ± 0.3783, 97, 111 (322)
2C251.87 ± 0.2525.45 ± 5.71352
3C27-dieneN.D.4.00 ± 0.66376
42-Me-C260.54 ± 0.3321.24 ± 4.43365, 337 (380)
5C27-monoeneN.D.10.36 ± 2.25378
6C27-monoeneN.D.11.39 ± 1.81378
7C2711.27 ± 1.559.63 ± 0.96380
8C29-dieneN.D.2.41 ± 0.38404
92-Me-C2820.51 ± 4.735.62 ± 0.88365, 393 (408)
10C29-monoene3.52 ± 0.55N.D.406
11C2915.41 ± 2.881.56 ± 0.56408
122-Me-C283.52 ± 0.310.26 ± 0.04365, 393 (408)
132-Me-C307.11 ± 0.776.39 ± 0.61393, 421 (436)
14C31-monoene36.24 ± 5.97N.D.434
1 N = 3 replicates; 2 ND = not detected.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Di Palma, A.; Pistillo, M.; Griffo, R.; Garonna, A.P.; Germinara, G.S. Scanning Electron Microscopy of the Antennal Sensilla and Their Secretion Analysis in Adults of Aromia bungii (Faldermann, 1835) (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae). Insects 2019, 10, 88. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects10040088

AMA Style

Di Palma A, Pistillo M, Griffo R, Garonna AP, Germinara GS. Scanning Electron Microscopy of the Antennal Sensilla and Their Secretion Analysis in Adults of Aromia bungii (Faldermann, 1835) (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae). Insects. 2019; 10(4):88. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects10040088

Chicago/Turabian Style

Di Palma, Antonella, Marco Pistillo, Raffaele Griffo, Antonio P. Garonna, and Giacinto S. Germinara. 2019. "Scanning Electron Microscopy of the Antennal Sensilla and Their Secretion Analysis in Adults of Aromia bungii (Faldermann, 1835) (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae)" Insects 10, no. 4: 88. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects10040088

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop