Next Article in Journal
Dissipative Processes and Their Role in the Evolution of Radio Galaxies
Previous Article in Journal
Halo Substructure Boosts to the Signatures of Dark Matter Annihilation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Magnetic Field Vector Structure of NGC6946
Open AccessArticle

Performance Test of QU-Fitting

Graduate School of Science and Technology, Kumamoto University, 2-39-1, Kurokami, Kumamoto 860-8555, Japan
Galaxies 2019, 7(3), 69;
Received: 12 December 2018 / Revised: 17 July 2019 / Accepted: 19 July 2019 / Published: 23 July 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Power of Faraday Tomography)
QU-fitting is a model-fit method to reproduce the model of the Faraday Dispersion Function (FDF or Faraday spectrum), which is a probability distribution function of polarized intensity in Faraday depth space. In order to find the best-fit parameters of the model FDF, we adopt the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm using Geweke’s convergence diagnostics. Akaike and Bayesian Information Criteria (AIC and BIC, respectively) are used to select the best model from several FDF fitting models. In this paper, we investigate the performance of the standard QU-fitting algorithm quantitatively by simulating spectro-polarimetric observations of two Faraday complex sources located along the same Line Of Sight (LOS), varying the gap between two sources in Faraday depth space and their widths, systematically. We fix the frequency bandwidth in 700–1800 MHz and make mock polarized spectra with a high Signal-to-Noise ratio (S/N). We prepare four FDF models for the fitting by changing the number of model parameters and test the correctness of MCMC and AIC/BIC. We find that the combination of MCMC and AIC/BIC works well for parameter estimation and model selection in the cases where the sources have widths smaller than 1/4 Full Width at Half Maximum (FWHM) and a gap larger than one FWHM in Faraday depth space. We note that when two sources have a gap of five FWHM in Faraday depth space, MCMC tends to be trapped in a local maximum likelihood compared to other situations. View Full-Text
Keywords: magnetic fields; methods: data analysis; techniques: polarimetric magnetic fields; methods: data analysis; techniques: polarimetric
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Miyashita, Y. Performance Test of QU-Fitting. Galaxies 2019, 7, 69.

AMA Style

Miyashita Y. Performance Test of QU-Fitting. Galaxies. 2019; 7(3):69.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Miyashita, Yoshimitsu. 2019. "Performance Test of QU-Fitting" Galaxies 7, no. 3: 69.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Search more from Scilit
Back to TopTop