Success of Strabismus Surgery in Intermittent Exotropia
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Methodology
3. Results
- Preoperative occlusive treatment: 196 patients (91.2%) underwent occlusion therapy as an anti-suppression exercise.
- Binocular function before surgery: 233 patients (92.5%) had binocular function prior to surgery. The odds ratio (OR) for surgical success in patients with binocular vision was 2.453 (p = 0.424).
- IXT type: 187 patients (93%) had basic-type intermittent exotropia, and 51 patients (89.5%) had divergence excess type. The OR for surgical success in patients with basic-type IXT was 0.636 (p = 0.378).
- Preoperative deviation angle: The mean deviation at distance was 31 ± 7.08∆ in the success group and 42 ± 7.27∆ in the no-success group. Patients with moderate deviation had a significantly higher chance of surgical success.
- AC/A ratio: The mean AC/A ratio was 7.09 ± 3.735 in the success group and 11.27 ± 9.035 in the no-success group. A statistically significant difference was found (OR = 0.920; p = 0.013), suggesting that a higher AC/A ratio is associated with lower surgical success.
- Total surgical dose: The mean total amount of recession (bilateral) was 13.65 ± 2.5 mm in the success group and 15.33 ± 3.395 mm in the no-success group. Although there was no statistically significant difference between larger setbacks (t = 1.891; p = 0.078), logistic regression showed a significant association (p = 0.025).
- Sex: Surgical success was achieved in 154 females (92.8%) and 84 males (91.3%). Although females tended to have a slightly higher success rate, the difference was not statistically significant (OR = 0.818; p = 0.673).
- Age and age at surgery: The mean age in the success group was 11.22 ± 3.589 years, compared to 12.20 ± 5.414 years in the no-success group. The mean age at surgery was 8.76 ± 12.617 years in the success group and 9.80 ± 5.519 years in the no-success group. There was no significant association between these variables and surgical success, although younger patients tended to have better outcomes (OR = 1.031; p = 0.627 for age; OR = 1.001; p = 0.954 for surgical age).
4. Discussion
4.1. Surgical Outcomes and Success Rates:
4.2. Factors Influencing Surgical Outcomes:
- Preoperative deviation angle: Statistical analysis showed that a smaller preoperative deviation angle was associated with higher surgical success. The mean angle in the success group was 31 ± 7.08∆, compared to 42 ± 7.27∆ in the no-success group. Patients with moderate deviations were significantly more likely to achieve success (OR = 9.259; p = 0.01). Quantitative analysis further confirmed the protective role of a smaller angle (OR = 0.837; p < 0.001), indicating that each additional prism diopter increased the risk of failure by approximately 16%. These results are consistent with previous findings, including those of Kopmann et al. (2024) [5], Tibrewal (2017) [22], and Thorisdottir (2022) [21], all of which suggest that patients with smaller preoperative angles have better outcomes.
- Age at surgery: The mean age in the success group was 11.22 ± 3.59 years, compared to 12.20 ± 5.41 years in the no-success group. The mean surgical age was 8.76 ± 12.62 years in the success group and 9.80 ± 5.52 years in the no-success group. Although no statistically significant association was found (p = 0.627 for age; p = 0.954 for surgical age), there was a tendency toward better results in younger patients. This is in agreement with Issaho et al. (2017) [11], although some authors, such as Jiménez-Romo (2023), argue that age is not a significant predictor of surgical success [23].
- Binocular function: Preoperative binocular function was present in 233 patients (92.5%). Although a tendency toward better outcomes in these patients was observed (OR = 2.453; p = 0.424), the association was not statistically significant. This suggests that surgery may either preserve or restore binocular function, depending on the preoperative status.
- AC/A ratio: The mean AC/A ratio was 7.09 ± 3.73 in the success group and 11.27 ± 9.04 in the no-success group. A higher AC/A ratio was significantly associated with lower surgical success (OR = 0.920; p = 0.013), indicating that patients with greater accommodative convergence relative to accommodation are less likely to benefit from surgery [24].
- Gender: Surgical success was achieved in 154 female patients (92.8%) and 84 male patients (91.3%). Although there was a slight trend toward higher success in females (OR = 0.818; p = 0.673), the difference was not statistically significant and may be due to chance.
- Preoperative occlusion therapy: Occlusion therapy was performed in 196 patients (91.2%). While it appeared to be a potential protective factor (OR = 0.246; p = 0.177), the association was not statistically significant. This finding is in line with the anterior works [14], who suggested that children undergoing occlusion therapy before surgery may have better outcomes.
- Surgical dose: The mean bilateral recession was 13.65 ± 2.5 mm in the success group and 15.33 ± 3.39 mm in the no-success group. Although the direct comparison did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.078), logistic regression revealed a significant negative association between larger recession amounts and surgical success (OR = 0.817; p = 0.025), indicating that higher surgical doses may be associated with a lower likelihood of favorable outcomes.
4.3. Study Limitations:
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Tejedor, J.Y.C. Strabismus and Amblyopia, 1st ed.; McGraw-Hill Interamericana de España S.L.: Madrid, Spain, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Jeanrot, N.; Ducret, V. Manuel de Strabologie: Aspects Cliniques et Thérapeutiques; Elsevier-Masson: Issy-les-Moulineaux, France, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- von Noorden, G.K.; Campos, E. Binocular Vision and Ocular Motility, 6th ed.; Mosby: Maryland Heights, MO, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Cristóvão, D.; Seldon, R.; De, M.; Vieira, L. Exotropia intermitente: From surgical success to long-term need for reoperation. Oftalmologia 2013, 37, 259. (In Portuguese) [Google Scholar]
- Kopmann, S.; Grenzebach, U.; Ehrt, O.; Biermann, J. Effectiveness of strabismus surgery in intermittent exotropia and factors influencing outcome. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Anand, K.; Krishnan, A.; Kumar, P.; Bharadwaj, A.; Dutta, P.; Rastogi, A.; Hariani, A. Comparative Study of Bilateral Versus Unilateral Strabismus Surgery in the Management of Lateral Incomitance in Intermittent Exotropia. J. Pediatr. Ophthalmol. Strabismus 2023, 60, 277–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yildirim, C.; Mutlu, F.M.; Chen, Y.; Altinsoy, H.I. Assessment of central and peripheral fusion and near and distance stereoacuity in intermittent exotropic patients before and after strabismus surgery. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 1999, 128, 222–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rajavi, Z.; Hafezian, S.F.; Yaseri, M.; Sheibani, K. Early postoperative alignment as a predictor of 6-month alignment after intermittent exotropia surgery. J. Pediatr. Ophthalmol. Strabismus 2014, 51, 274–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Huh, J.; Ha, S.G.; Kim, S.H. Recovery From Suppression with Successful Motor Alignment After Surgery for Intermittent Exotropia. J. Pediatr. Ophthalmol. Strabismus 2020, 57, 21–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Maruo, T.; Kubota, N.; Sakaue, T.; Usui, C. Intermittent exotropia surgery in children: Long term outcome regarding changes in binocular alignment. A study of 666 cases. Binocul. Vis. Strabismus Q. 2001, 16, 265–270. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Issaho, D.C.; Wang, S.X.; Weakley, D.R. Intermittent exotropia surgery: Results in different age groups. Arq. Bras. Oftalmol. 2017, 80, 355–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xu, M.; Zheng, F.; Peng, Y.; Wang, C.; Lou, J.; Yu, H.; Wang, Y.; Yu, X. Effects of orthoptic therapy in children with intermittent exotropia after surgery: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2022, 23, 1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Farid, M.F.; Abdelbaset, E.A. Surgical outcomes of three different surgical techniques for treatment of convergence insufficiency intermittent exotropia. Eye 2018, 32, 693–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bae, G.H.; Bae, S.H.; Choi, D.G. Surgical outcomes of intermittent exotropia according to exotropia type based on distance/near differences. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0214478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hong, S.; Ha, S.; Seo, Y.; Kim, S. Analysis of Postoperative Outcomes in Patients with Intermittent Exotropia According to Preoperative Change of Angle of Deviation. Korean J. Ophthalmol. KJO 2021, 35, 130–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lavrich, J.B. Intermittent exotropia: Continued controversies and current management. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol. 2015, 26, 375–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fortin, M.F. Fundamentos E Etapas no Processo de Investigação; Lusodidacta: Sintra, Portugal, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Oliveira, A. Bioestatística Descodificada, 2nd ed.; LIDEL—Edições Técnicas, Lda.: Lisboa, Portugal, 2014; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
- Vicente, V.; Aguiar, P. Practical Epidemiology with GLM; Editora d’Ideias: Coimbra, Portugal, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Donahue, S.P.; Chandler, D.L.; Wu, R.; Marsh, J.D.; Law, C.; Areaux, R.G., Jr.; Ghasia, F.F.; Li, Z.; Kraker, R.T.; Cotter, S.A.; et al. Eight-Year Outcomes of Bilateral Lateral Rectus Recessions versus Unilateral Recession-Resection in Childhood Basic-Type Intermittent Exotropia. Ophthalmology 2024, 131, 98–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Thorisdottir, R.; Malmsjö, M.; Tenland, K.; Blohmé, J.; Hesgaard, H. The success of unilateral surgery for constant and intermittent exotropia and factors affecting it in a large Scandinavian case series. J. Pediatr. Ophthalmol. Strabismus 2021, 58, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tibrewal, S.; Singh, N.; Bhuiyan, M.; Ganesh, S. Factors affecting residual exotropia after two muscle surgery for intermittent exotropia. Int. J. Ophthalmol. 2017, 10, 1120–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jiménez-Romo, C.A.; Rangel-Padilla, A.; Páez-Garza, J.H. Timely Surgery in Intermittent Exotropia. J. Binocul. Vis. Ocul. Motil. 2023, 73, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brodsky, M.C.; Horwood, A.M.; Riddell, P.M. Intermittent exotropia: Are we underminusing by not overminusing? J. AAPOS 2015, 19, 397–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Exotropia Angle in PD | Amount of Recession/Resection in Mm | |
---|---|---|
Two muscles | BLRc | LRc + MRs (R&R) |
15 | 4.0 | 4.0 + 3.0 |
20 | 5.0 | 5.0 + 4.0 |
25 | 6.0 | 6.0 + 4.0 |
30 | 7.0 | 7.0 + 5.5 |
35 | 7.5 | 7.5 + 5.5 |
40 | 8.0 | 8.0 + 5.5 |
45 | 8.5 | 8.5 + 6.0 |
50 | 9.0 | 9.0 + 6.5 |
60 | 10 | 9.0 + 7.0 |
Exposure | Group: Success | Group: No Success | OR | p-Value | 95% Confidence Interval |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gender Female (reference) Male | 154 (92.8%) 84 (91.3%) | 12 (7.2%) 8 (8.7%) | 0.818 | 0.673 | 0.322; 2.080 |
Age | 11.22 ± 3.589 | 12.20 ± 5.414 | 1.031 | 0.627 | 0.911; 1.168 |
Surgical Age | 8.76 ± 12.617 | 9.80 ± 5.519 | 1.001 | 0.954 | 0.962; 1.042 |
Prior occlusive treatment Yes No (reference) | 196 (91.2%) 42 (97.7%) | 19 (8.8%) 1 (2.3%) | 0.246 | 0.177 | 0.032; 1.886 |
XTI type DET BT (reference) | 51 (89.5%) 187 (93%) | 6 (10.5%) 14(7%) | 0.636 | 0.378 | 0.233; 1.739 |
Moderate preoperative deviation Yes No (reference) | 76 (100%) 162 (89%) | 0(0%) 20 (11%) | 9.259 * | 0.01 | 1.648; 196.3 |
Magnitude of preoperative deviation | 31 ± 7.080 | 42 ± 7.270 | 0.837 | <0.001 | 0.777; 0.901 |
AC/A ratio | 7.09 ± 3.735 | 11.27 ± 9.035 | 0.920 | 0.013 | 0.861; 0.983 |
Binocular Preoperative Yes No (reference) | 233 (92.5%) 5 (83.3%) | 19 (7.5%) 1 (16.7%) | 2.453 | 0.424 | 0.272; 22.077 |
Surgical Dose (mm) | 13.65 ± 2.5 | 15.33 ± 3.395 | 0.817 | 0.025 | 0.685; 0.975 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Lino, P.; de Aguiar, P.V.; Cunha, J.P. Success of Strabismus Surgery in Intermittent Exotropia. J. Pers. Med. 2025, 15, 333. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15080333
Lino P, de Aguiar PV, Cunha JP. Success of Strabismus Surgery in Intermittent Exotropia. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 2025; 15(8):333. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15080333
Chicago/Turabian StyleLino, Pedro, Pedro Vargues de Aguiar, and João Paulo Cunha. 2025. "Success of Strabismus Surgery in Intermittent Exotropia" Journal of Personalized Medicine 15, no. 8: 333. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15080333
APA StyleLino, P., de Aguiar, P. V., & Cunha, J. P. (2025). Success of Strabismus Surgery in Intermittent Exotropia. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 15(8), 333. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15080333