Next Article in Journal
Ultrafast Breast MRI: A Narrative Review
Previous Article in Journal
The Prediction of Intrapartum Fetal Compromise According to the Expected Fetal Weight
Previous Article in Special Issue
Personalized Risk Assessment for Taxane-Induced Hypersensitivity Reactions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Targeted Therapeutic Approaches for the Treatment of Cancer: The Future Is Bright

by
Matthew J. Hadfield
1,*,
Benedito A. Carneiro
1 and
Liang Cheng
2,*
1
Legorreta Cancer Center, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA
2
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Department of Surgery (Urology), Brown University Warren Alpert Medical School, the Legorreta Cancer Center at Brown University, and Brown University Health, Providence, RI 02912, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Pers. Med. 2025, 15(4), 141; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15040141
Submission received: 20 March 2025 / Accepted: 31 March 2025 / Published: 2 April 2025
The last two decades have ushered in unprecedented advancements in the treatment of cancer. The development of drug targets based on the molecular makeup of tumors has resulted in multiple new classes of anti-cancer therapies and novel drug designs and mechanisms of action. The shift towards personalized therapy was predicated on the decoding of the cancer genome. The better delineation of driver genomic alterations and signaling networks has contributed to the unraveling of a multitude of new drug targets. This has been possible due to dramatic improvements in multiple fields including biotechnology, molecular genetics, and molecular sequencing. The integration of digital pathology, advanced tools for the characterization of tumor microenvironments, and target expression aligned with artificial intelligence are reshaping the future of precision medicine and drug development in oncology.
The molecular characterization of tumors has made possible the development of entirely new classes of anti-cancer therapies and these advancements have ushered in the era of targeted therapeutics, drugs that target specific genomic alterations and their downstream proteins. The successful therapeutic targeting of the Kristen rat sarcoma virus (KRAS) gene represents a relatively recent major achievement. For decades, KRAS was considered ‘undruggable’ due to the small size of the protein and its biochemically unfavorable binding sites [1]. This paradigm was reversed with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)’s approval of the first KRAS inhibitor, sotorasib, for the treatment non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring KRAS G12C mutations in 2021, followed by the approval of adagrasib in 2022. Currently, several pan-KRAS inhibitors are in clinical trial development with promising preliminary results. To date, there are over 50 small molecule drugs targeting protein alterations across all solid tumors [2].
A better understanding of tumor biology changed the classification of malignancies and refined molecular subtypes based on novel targets. Specific histology-based definitions of malignancy have incorporated the molecular profile to better characterize tumors. There have now been several regulatory approvals for the tissue-agnostic utilization of drugs based on specific genomic alterations. These include larotrectinib and entrectinib for neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) fusions (2018), dabrafenib and trametinib for B-Raf-Protoco-Oncogene (BRAF) V600E mutated solid tumors (2022), and selpercatanib for rearranged during transfection (RET) fusion cancers (2022) [3].
The field of targeted therapies has contributed to the enhancement of the clinical impact of antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) as a new class of drugs. Following a long development trajectory, the first ADCs were approved by the FDA in 2000. Increased bioengineering capabilities and molecular genetics have enabled the exploration of new targets and more efficient drug design, and this has led to over 25 FDA approvals at the present time, across multiple tumor types [4]. The best example of ADCs dramatically changing the landscape of standard-of-care treatment options is breast cancer, where trastuzumab–deruxtecan (T-DXd) redefined HER-2 positivity by demonstrating efficacy in the HER-2 subtype of tumors [5]. Following the trend of small-molecule inhibitors, T-Dxd became the first ADC to receive a tissue-agnostic approval in 2024 for tumors expressing HER-2 positivity.
Advancements in drug discovery have been augmented by profound improvements in biomarker testing capabilities. The utilization of computational pathology, now augmented by artificial intelligence, has enabled the better characterization of cell surface markers [6]. Additionally, large language models have made it possible to analyze vast amounts of unstructured patient data to better elucidate predictors of response and toxicity [7]. This unprecedented progress has called into question traditional study design and has led to innovative platforms for better, more efficient clinical trials. Perhaps the best example of this is the Project Optimus initiative by the US Food and Drug Administration, which aims to better identify efficacious dosing for targeted therapies and avoid unnecessary toxicity by escalating to higher doses without additional benefit [8].
Despite an ever-increasing number of therapeutic options for patients, significant hurdles still limit their broader adoption. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) remains underutilized despite being the standard of care for a multitude of tumors [9]. Multiple cancers lack effective targeted therapeutic options. The discovery of new biomarkers and the development of novel targeted therapies will heavily depend on shared resources from international consortiums as well as robust collaborations between industry and academic researchers.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

List of Contributions

  • Williams, N.R. Analysis of Clinical Trials and Review of Recent Advances in Therapy Decisions for Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer. J. Pers. Med. 2023, 13, 938. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13060938. PMID: 37373928; PMCID: PMC10305067.
  • Park, H.J.; Ko, M.; Kim, I.W.; Oh, J.M. Personalized Risk Assessment for Taxane-Induced Hypersensitivity Reactions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Pers. Med. 2024, 15, 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15010002. PMID: 39852195; PMCID: PMC11767215.
  • Inchingolo, A.M.; Malcangi, G.; Piras, F.; Palmieri, G.; Settanni, V.; Riccaldo, L.; Morolla, R.; Buongiorno, S.; de Ruvo, E.; Inchingolo, A.D.; et al. Precision Medicine on the Effects of Microbiota on Head-Neck Diseases and Biomarkers Diagnosis. J. Pers. Med. 2023, 13, 933. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13060933. PMID: 37373922; PMCID: PMC10304239.
  • Malcangi, G.; Patano, A.; Guglielmo, M.; Sardano, R.; Palmieri, G.; Di Pede, C.; de Ruvo, E.; Inchingolo, A.D.; Mancini, A.; Inchingolo, F.; et al. Precision Medicine in Oral Health and Diseases: A Systematic Review. J. Pers. Med. 2023, 13, 725. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13050725. PMID: 37240895; PMCID: PMC10219503.
  • Chen, J.; Yao, L.; Alamoudi, A.J.; Aleya, L.; Gu, W. A Historical Misconception in Clinical Trials of Drugs for Cancer-Age Grouping. J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12, 1998. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12121998. PMID: 36556219; PMCID: PMC9785466.

References

  1. Huang, L.; Guo, Z.; Wang, F.; Fu, L. KRAS mutation: From undruggable to druggable in cancer. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2021, 6, 386. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. Liu, B.; Zhou, H.; Tan, L.; Siu, K.T.H.; Guan, X.-Y. Exploring treatment options in cancer: Tumor treatment strategies. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2024, 9, 175. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Tateo, V.; Marchese, P.V.; Mollica, V.; Massari, F.; Kurzrock, R.; Adashek, J.J. Agnostic Approvals in Oncology: Getting the Right Drug to the Right Patient with the Right Genomics. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Shastry, M.; Gupta, A.; Chandarlapaty, S.; Young, M.; Powles, T.; Hamilton, E. Rise of Antibody-Drug Conjugates: The Present and Future. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. Educ. Book 2023, 43, e390094. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Nicolò, E.; Bielo, L.B.; Curigliano, G.; Tarantino, P. The HER2-low revolution in breast oncology: Steps forward and emerging challenges. Ther. Adv. Med. Oncol. 2023, 15, 17588359231152842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Reis-Filho, J.S.; Scaltriti, M.; Kapil, A.; Sade, H.; Galbraith, S. Shifting the paradigm in personalized cancer care through next-generation therapeutics and computational pathology. Mol. Oncol. 2024, 18, 2607–2611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Jee, J.; Fong, C.; Pichotta, K.; Tran, T.N.; Luthra, A.; Waters, M.; Fu, C.; Altoe, M.; Liu, S.-Y.; Maron, S.B.; et al. Automated real-world data integration improves cancer outcome prediction. Nature 2024, 636, 728–736. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Gao, W.; Liu, J.; Shtylla, B.; Venkatakrishnan, K.; Yin, D.; Shah, M.; Nicholas, T.; Cao, Y. Realizing the promise of Project Optimus: Challenges and emerging opportunities for dose optimization in oncology drug development. CPT Pharmacomet. Syst. Pharmacol. 2024, 13, 691–709. [Google Scholar]
  9. Vidal, G.A.; Jain, N.; Fisher, A.; Sheinson, D.; Lofgren, K.T.; Ma, E.; Yu, E.; Comment, L.; Miksad, R.; Sincan, M.; et al. Racial and Ethnic Inequities at the Practice and Physician Levels in Timely Next-Generation Sequencing for Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated in the US Community Setting. JCO Oncol. Pract. 2024, 20, 370–377. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hadfield, M.J.; Carneiro, B.A.; Cheng, L. Targeted Therapeutic Approaches for the Treatment of Cancer: The Future Is Bright. J. Pers. Med. 2025, 15, 141. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15040141

AMA Style

Hadfield MJ, Carneiro BA, Cheng L. Targeted Therapeutic Approaches for the Treatment of Cancer: The Future Is Bright. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 2025; 15(4):141. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15040141

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hadfield, Matthew J., Benedito A. Carneiro, and Liang Cheng. 2025. "Targeted Therapeutic Approaches for the Treatment of Cancer: The Future Is Bright" Journal of Personalized Medicine 15, no. 4: 141. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15040141

APA Style

Hadfield, M. J., Carneiro, B. A., & Cheng, L. (2025). Targeted Therapeutic Approaches for the Treatment of Cancer: The Future Is Bright. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 15(4), 141. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15040141

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop