Next Article in Journal
Is There a Place for Apheresis in the Management of Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy? A Report of Three Cases and Literature Review
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of Hemodynamic Changes and Fluid Response during Anesthesia in Lumbar Disc Hernias with Pleth Variability Index (PVI)
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Case for Pre-Emptive Pharmacogenetic Screening in South Africa
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Genetics behind Sulfation: Impact on Airway Remodeling

by
Charikleia Ntenti
1,2,3,*,
Eleni Papakonstantinou
2,3,
Liana Fidani
4,
Daiana Stolz
2,3 and
Antonis Goulas
1,5,*
1
1st Laboratory of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
2
Clinic of Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
3
Clinic of Respiratory Medicine and Pulmonary Cell Research, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
4
Laboratory of Medical Biology-Genetics, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
5
Special Unit for Biomedical Research and Education, School of Medicine, Clinical Research Unit, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Pers. Med. 2024, 14(3), 248; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14030248
Submission received: 10 January 2024 / Revised: 15 February 2024 / Accepted: 19 February 2024 / Published: 25 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pharmacogenomics: Current Status and Future Perspectives)

Abstract

:
In COPD, chronic inflammation and exposure to irritants, such as cigarette smoke, lead to the thickening of bronchial walls. This results from increased deposition of collagen and other extracellular matrix components, contributing to the narrowing of airways. Nevertheless, it is widely recognized that COPD is an inflammatory disorder marked by partially reversible airflow limitation wherein genetic factors interact with the environment. In recent years, numerous investigations have substantiated the correlation between gene polymorphisms and COPD. SUMF1 has been implicated in diverse cellular processes, including lysosomal function and extracellular matrix maintenance, both of which play pivotal roles in respiratory health. The genetic variations in SUMF1 could lead to an imbalanced sulfation in the extracellular matrix of lung tissue, potentially playing a role in the onset of COPD. Recent studies have uncovered a potential link between dysregulation of SUMF1 and COPD progression, shedding light on its involvement in the abnormal sulfatase activity observed in COPD patients. Through a comprehensive review of current literature and experimental findings, this article aims to contribute to the growing body of knowledge surrounding the genetic intricacies concerning sulfation of airway remodeling and possible pharmacological applications in COPD and asthma management.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are defined by the presence of airflow obstruction, measurable structural changes in the airways [1,2], and inflammation [3,4].
According to the World Health Organization, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is anticipated to rank as the fourth leading cause of global mortality by 2040 [5].
COPD is characterized by chronic bronchitis, remodeling of small airways, and the presence of emphysema, predominantly affecting the elderly as a disease associated with accelerated lung aging [6]. Emphysema’s hallmark feature involves the breakdown of alveolar structures, resulting in enlarged air spaces and a diminished surface area. Existing experimental evidence proposes that the development of emphysema is propelled by the expedited senescence of lung cells; nevertheless, the precise mechanism underlying this senescence process remains elusive [7]. COPD is predominantly associated with prolonged cigarette smoking [8], yet diverse genetic factors can influence susceptibility to lung damage and the subsequent development of COPD [9]. These factors range from genetic, infectious, and inflammatory factors to social aspects linked to lifestyle modifications. Much of the knowledge regarding the pathological features of COPD is derived from studies on smokers, revealing an intensified inflammatory response to chronic irritants and structural alterations resulting from repetitive injury and healing processes, which persist even after smoking cessation. In non-smokers, additional factors such as systemic inflammation, genetic predisposition, oxidative stress, and alterations in the lung microbiome may also contribute to the disease. COPD stands as a persistent inflammatory lung condition, with inflammation playing a pivotal role in the initial stages of emphysema, particularly concerning the mechanisms triggering early alveolar destruction [10,11].
On the other hand, asthma also exhibits high prevalence, impacting a total of 262 million individuals, as reported by the World Health Organization (WHO). The primary form of asthma, known as atopic asthma, is induced by allergic inflammation triggered by allergens, leading to tissue damage. This damage is induced by eosinophils’ major basic protein [12], proteases of mast cells [13], or neutrophil extracellular traps in cases of inflammation associated with neutrophils [14]. If the inflammatory response is brief, repair processes can eliminate the damage. However, persistent inflammation leads to excessive repair processes, causing the remodeling of lung tissue. This remodeling includes hyperplasia of mucus-producing goblet cells, thickening of the basal lamina of the airway epithelium, neovascularization, and the formation of fibrotic foci below the basement membrane [15]. Taken together, these processes contribute to airway obstruction [16]. Consequently, it is widely acknowledged that cellular senescence and inflammation are intricately linked in the context of accelerated or premature lung aging, often referred to as “inflammaging” [12,17,18].
Due to the heterogeneous nature of COPD, patients likely exhibit diverse genetic patterns. The decline in lung function observed in COPD results primarily from airway inflammation induced by oxidative stress, leading to airway remodeling and tissue degradation. It is crucial to explore different gene polymorphisms associated with these processes to gain insights into their roles in disease progression. Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency, linked to the SERPINA1 gene polymorphism, stands out as a well-known genetic factor in developing COPD [19]. Additionally, various single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with inflammatory processes and biological stress pathways have been identified in connection with COPD [20,21]. Polymorphisms related to connective tissue remodeling, such as matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-7 influencing early COPD development [22] and MMP-12 associated with severe/very severe COPD, have also been recognized [23]. A shared pathological characteristic among the two diseases is fibrotic tissue mainly present in the airway wall.

2. Alveolar Formation

Alveolarization is a complex process influenced by the intricate interplay of extracellular matrix proteins (ECM) and secreted growth factors [24]. ECM, as a three-dimensional scaffold present in the airways, offers physical support to cells and provides biochemical signals crucial for cellular processes such as morphogenesis, differentiation, and tissue homeostasis [25]. The alveolar ECM consists of various components, including type IV collagen, laminin, entactin/nidogen, tenascin, integrins, elastin, fibrillins, and proteoglycans [26]. Proteoglycans (PG) are structured with a protein core to which one or more highly sulfated polysaccharide chains, known as glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), attach. Comprising macromolecules, primarily structural proteins and GAGs, the ECM includes polysaccharides like galactosamine, N-acetylgalactosamine-4-sulphate, galactose, or galacturonic acid in repeating disaccharide units. Major GAG types in the airways and lungs, such as heparin/heparin sulfate, chondroitin sulfate, dermatan sulfate, hyaluronic acid, and keratin sulfate, are typically covalently linked to core proteins like syndecan (chondroitin and heparin sulfate), decorin (dermatan sulfate), and glypican (heparan sulfate) [27]. These proteoglycans play a crucial role in stabilizing the three-dimensional fibrillar matrix, providing resistance to tissue compression and accommodating interstitial fluid expansion. Additionally, the glycosaminoglycans within proteoglycans have been recognized for regulating various functions in organ growth, as well as cell differentiation and proliferation [28]. The ability of glycosaminoglycans to mediate these functions is contingent on their degree of sulfation, a characteristic determined by sulfotransferases that incorporate sulfated groups and sulfatases that remove them [29,30]. In the early stages of human lung development, collagens I, III, and VI, along with proteoglycans (decorin, biglycan, and lumican), are primarily observed at the interface between the epithelium and the mesenchyme, forming a sleeve around the developing airways [31]. The proteoglycan component of the ECM may play a role in regulating airway branching, partly due to the capacity of sulfated proteoglycans to bind with FGF10, a crucial factor for branching [32]. Moreover, GAGs within the ECM interact with various proteins, including chemokines, cytokines, and adhesion molecules [33]. Due to their common association with the cell membrane, GAGs function as cell surface receptors or co-receptors, capturing ligands necessary for activating downstream signaling. For instance, heparan sulfate (HS) and its proteoglycan syndecan play a role in capturing the fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptor (FGFR), facilitating its internalization and endosomal sorting in an FGF-dependent manner [34]. Cell surface GAGs also bind to chemokines released during tissue injury, guiding leukocyte migration, and promoting inflammation, potentially influencing tissue repair or healing [35].

3. Sulfatases Pivotal in Extracellular Matrix Remodeling

Previous research has indicated that there is a compromise in heparan sulfate in emphysema, potentially resulting in significant disruptions in the coordination of growth factors, proteases, and other ECM molecules [36]. This disruption may lead to hindered lung tissue repair and regeneration, ultimately contributing to the development of emphysematous lesions [37]. Additionally, chondroitin sulfate has been demonstrated to play a dynamic role in the growth and morphogenesis of the embryonic lung [38]. Dermatan sulfate, on the other hand, impacts the function of growth factors within the lung and influences proliferation in a cell-type-specific manner. Moreover, dermatan sulfate serves as a docking molecule for the adhesion of various human pathogenic microorganisms [39].
Sulfated proteoglycans (PGs) are composed of core proteins that undergo covalent modification through the addition of sulfate chains, featuring variably sulfated repeating disaccharide units [38]. These molecules play a crucial role in numerous signaling functions, utilizing their sulfated chains to bind diverse protein ligands, including growth factors, morphogens, chemokines, and cytokines. The effectiveness of these ligand interactions is heavily influenced by the pattern and density of sulfation modifications, with particular emphasis on the significance of 6-O-sulfation of glucosamine (6OS) in many interactions [40].
A unique regulatory mechanism for PG-dependent signaling is introduced by two extracellular sulfatases, namely SULF1 and SULF2. These enzymes operate at neutral pH and function extracellularly to remove 6OS from intact PGs. This removal by SULFs presents a novel means of influencing PG-dependent signaling. Notably, the enzymatic activity of SULFs contributes to the modulation of key signaling pathways by mobilizing protein ligands (such as Wnt, GDNF, PDGF-B, and BMP-4) from PGs’ sequestration. Consequently, this liberation enables the ligands to bind to signal transduction receptors, facilitating downstream signaling events. SULF1 and SULF2 sulfatases in humans are processed by furin-like endoproteases and form disulfide-bond-linked heterodimers of 75 kDa and 50 kDa. This is a key event in the translocation of SULFs in specialized membrane microdomains. Both SULF1 and SULF2 take out sulfate groups on C-6 positions of glucosamines, trisulfated disaccharides of heparin/heparan sulfate (HS) glycosaminoglycan chains [41,42]. Sulfatases play a vital role in the intricate equilibrium of connective tissue remodeling by eliminating sulfate from specific sulfated carbohydrate chains. SULFs have been recently identified as members of the sulfatases’ family. A core event in the characterization of sulfatases is the discovery of QSulf-1 in quail, and then the discovery of their orthologs in rodents and humans [43,44]. Following the discovery of QSulf-1, the cloning and characterization of Sulf-1 took place. It is of great importance for tissue connectivity and remodeling that, even though most of the known and understood sulfatases are localized in the lysosomes, SULFs are anchored on the cell surface or secreted in the extracellular space. Each SULF molecule contains a signal peptide and two distinct sulfatase-related domains, interrupted by a large hydrophobic domain. Successful SULFs activation requires post-translational modification with formylglycine and N-linked glycans [43,45]. Therefore, the SULFs are endosulfatases that remove sulfate esters from glycosamine inside the appropriate contexts of heparin and HS chains [42]. SULF2, a 6-O sulfatase of the extracellular matrix (ECM), desulfates heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs), releasing growth factors and cytokines from storage sites and activating downstream signaling pathways, including FGF, VEGF, PDGF, IL-6, TGFβ, and WNT [46]. SULF2 influences fibrotic liver disease by interacting with the TGF-β1/Smad pathway, and it appears that Transforming Growth Factor Beta Receptor 3 (TGFBR3) plays a significant role in mediating the activation of the TGF-β1 signaling pathway by SULF2 [47]. While variations in the SULF2 gene have been documented and linked to the pathogenesis of several diseases, there is currently no reported association with COPD or other lung diseases.
Although the exact importance of fibrosis-related alterations in the sulfation profile remains uncertain, alterations in the sulfation of Chondroitin sulfate (CS) and Dermatan sulfate (DS) chains might be associated with the processes involved in ECM remodeling during lung injury and repair in lung fibrosis. Elevated sulfation levels could create new epitopes by introducing additional negative charges, imparting novel physical and chemical characteristics to GAG chains. Furthermore, it is plausible that changes in the sulfation pattern of CS/DS GAG chains may lead to an increased affinity for growth factors, adhesion molecules, or other cytokines, potentially aiding in matrix repair by fibroblasts and/or myofibroblasts. Changes in the expression of GAGs and their sulfation patterns may also impact several biologically significant events, such as the accumulation of inflammatory cells, cellular adhesion, migration, and proliferation. Selective desulfation of endogenous HS and inhibition of HS biosynthesis have been shown to increase cellular iron in cell lines and mice, respectively [48].

4. Sulfatase Modifying Factor 1—The Master Regulator of Sulfatases Activity

To initiate the hydrolysis of their natural substrates, sulfatases require post-translational activation. A consensus sequence within their catalytic domain includes a cysteine that undergoes modification into formylglycine (FGly), a process facilitated by the formylglycine-generating enzyme encoded by the sulfatase modifying factor 1 (SUMF1) gene [49,50,51]. SUMF1, the key controller for all recognized sulfatases in the organism, transforming them into an active state, a protein-coding gene, encodes the formylglycine-generating enzyme (FGE) responsible for the conversion of cysteine to FGly [52]. This enzyme facilitates the breakdown of sulfate esters by causing the oxidation of a cysteine residue within the sulfatase substrate, leading to the formation of an active site 3-oxoalanine residue. In the lungs, GAGs are distributed within the ECM [53]. SUMF1 carries out a unique post-translational modification essential for sulfatase activity, allowing it to desulfate GAGs [30,54]. SUMF1 carries out its function within the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) where it activates all newly synthesized sulfatases (Figure 1); however, it also has the ability to be secreted and taken up by distant cells and tissues, where it relocates within the ER as an active enzyme [55].
Multiple sulfatase deficiency (MSD) is a monogenic disorder in humans characterized by simultaneous defects in all sulfatase activity [49]. Individuals with MSD exhibit mutations in the SUMF1 gene [49]. As a mouse model of MSD, a Sumf1−/− strain has been developed, displaying a complete loss of sulfatase activities, early mortality, congenital growth retardation, skeletal abnormalities, neurological defects, and a generalized inflammatory process affecting various organs [56]. The emphysema-like characteristics observed earlier suggested a potential involvement of SUMF1 in the onset of COPD, characterized by emphysema development [57]. Apart from the emphysema-like features, extensive accumulation of GAGs was identified in various cell and tissue types in SUMF1−/− mice [58]. In a preceding study, several SNPs affecting the gene expression of specific splice variants in SUMF1 were discovered and associated with COPD [59].
Mutations in SUMF1 stand as the leading cause of various human diseases, many of which have detrimental effects on the lungs [59]. Individuals with impaired SUMF1 activity experience an accumulation of sulfated GAGs, resulting in multiple sulfatase deficiency, a disorder characterized by lysosomal storage issues. The human genome encodes a total of 17 sulfatases, with 13 of them biochemically characterized. Two decades ago, the number of identified sulfatases was quite limited and unable to explain the vast diversity of sulfated molecules. At least five of the known sulfatases are essential for non-redundant desulfation of GAGs in the lysosome. Dysfunction in sulfatase activity, particularly in multiple sulfatase deficiency, results in intralysosomal storage and cellular damage.
On one hand, a SUMF1 mutation contributes to a decline in pulmonary function by impacting alveolar function. The coordination of alveolar formation, also known as alveolization, involves intricate regulation and complex interactions between growth factors and extracellular matrix proteins [60]. It has been confirmed that sulfatase cannot achieve full activation in SUMF1 (−/−) mice. This leads to the deposition of highly sulfated GAGs in the alveoli, reducing the alveolar septum and increasing alveolar volume, ultimately resulting in decreased lung function [58].
Despite its well-established role in multiple sulfatase deficiency [61], observations by Arteaga-Solis et al. [58] revealed that Sumf1−/− mice displayed a lung phenotype akin to emphysema, linked to a post-natal arrest in alveolarization. In a previous clinical investigation, several single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in SUMF1, particularly rs793391, exhibited notable associations with COPD. Sumf1−/− mice exhibited a lung phenotype resembling emphysema, attributed to post-natal alveolarization arrest. In a prior clinical study, several SNPs in SUMF1, notably rs793391, showed significant associations with COPD.
Twelve Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) in the SUMF1 gene were identified as noteworthy through the analysis of expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL). Certain variations in the splicing patterns of SUMF1 demonstrated diminished expression levels in sputum cells among individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in comparison to those in the control group [59]. Moreover, when considering the SUMF1 SNP rs11915920 in conjunction with the expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) analyses, it emerged as a prominent genetic marker. Reduced mRNA expression levels were noted in sputum cells and lung fibroblasts among individuals with the variant allele, aligning and confirming the outcomes of the eQTL analysis conducted on lung tissue. The findings confirm and align with the results of the lung tissue eQTL analysis [61]. Notably, a previous genome-wide association study identified an association between SUMF1 and prominent emphysema, although this association was not further investigated [62]. The role of lysosomal sulfatases ARSA, -G, and -K in extracellular matrix remodeling, particularly in COPD, remains unclear, despite their categorization in various lysosomal storage disorders linked to sulfatase deficiency or alterations [54,63,64].
SUMF2 is a paralog gene of the SUMF1, representing an additional level of control of the sulfatase activity and sharing a 48% amino-acid identity and 62% similarity with SUMF1. Data from the northern blotting analysis showed that the expression of SUMF2 mRNA is of comparable amount with respect to the SUMF1 transcript [46]. The similarity on expression levels of SUMF1 and SUMF2 suggest that these two genes may be coregulated on a transcription level [46]. Furthermore, experiments on cell lines showed that the transcription of SUMF2 is dependent on SUMF1 [46].
Despite the advances made in researching the metabolic functions of pFGE (SUMF2 expression) over the past decade, the precise role of SUMF2 in allergic inflammation in asthma remains unclear [55,65,66,67,68,69,70]. Recent investigations by other research groups have indicated that SUMF2 (along with SUMF1) resides in the luminal space of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), where synthesized sulfatases undergo post-translational modification through the formation of FGly. SUMF2 has the ability to bind to SUMF1 and sulfatase, thereby regulating their activities and the FGly formation process [55,69,70]. Notably, human IL-13 typically undergoes post-translational modification in the ER [71]. Based on these findings, someone could hypothesize that SUMF2 may alter the modification and secretion of IL-13 within the ER, and thus, variations in this gene could have a significant impact on downstream processes.
The most abundant sulfated glycosaminoglycan (GAG) in the lung is heparan sulfate (HS), but chondroitin sulfate (CS) and dermatan sulfate (DS) are also present. HS binds to perlecan, glypicans, and syndecans, playing a vital role in various physiological processes, ECM interactions, and activation of molecules. Chondroitin sulfate (CS) and dermatan sulfate (DS) have crucial roles in ECM protein activation and degradation. Given the impact of GAG sulfation on iron homeostasis, SUMF1 polymorphisms may influence iron homeostasis in the lung, potentially affecting susceptibility to COPD and/or its progression. The specific direction of this effect is challenging to predict due to limited data on the interaction between sulfated GAGs and BMP6 on BMP6 receptor (BMP6R) functionality. However, patients homozygous for the reference (A) allele of rs793391 displayed lower FEV1/FVC and FEV1% predicted values, suggesting a potential impact on BMP6 signaling and increased hepcidin expression, leading to enhanced iron loading into cells and potential consequences for alveolar architecture [59].

5. Discussion

In the pathogenesis of COPD, thickening of airway walls due to chronic inflammation is a significant event. Neutrophils, macrophages, and T-lymphocytes participate in the inflammatory process, leading to airway thickening related to the hyperplasia of airway smooth muscle cells and (myo-)fibroblasts and the expanded deposition of extracellular matrix [4,72]. Both bronchial epithelium and airway smooth muscle are involved in airway remodeling in COPD. Cytokines and growth factors, such as platelet-derived growth factor-B (PDGF-B), epidermal growth factor (EGF), and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), play a significant role in this remodeling, released from the sites of the airway wall (Remodeling in Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease, n.d.). Fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) have an important role in the regulation of airway remodeling, with members of the EGF and FGF family playing a part in persistent inflammation and tissue repair processes, leading to pulmonary fibrosis [73,74]. According to these data, cell–cell interactions and interactions between cells and various growth factors including basic FGF (FGF-2), insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), PDGF-B, TGF-β, endothelin-1 (ET-1), and EGF, result in enhanced cellular proliferation and increased collagen expression [75].
The FGF–FGFR system is hypothesized to be involved in the pathogenesis of COPD, with expression profiles of FGF-1, FGF-2, and FGFR-1 analyzed in bronchial airways of individuals who are current or former smokers, with or without COPD [76]. The findings of the study revealed an elevation in the bronchial expression of FGF-1, FGF-2, and FGFR-1 in COPD patients, suggesting their potential involvement in regulating pulmonary airway remodeling [77].
Within the lung, the extracellular matrix (ECM) assumes a vital role in both the appropriate construction and upkeep of alveolar structure, underscoring the significance of proteoglycans in lung architecture. The pulmonary extracellular matrix holds sway over the tissue architecture of the lung, ensuring the essential mechanical stability and elastic recoil required for normal physiological lung function [78].
Although the significance of fibrosis-related changes in the sulfation profile is presently unknown, aberrations in the sulfation of CS/DS chains may be linked to the processes of ECM remodeling during lung injury and repair in pulmonary fibrosis. Increases in sulfation may generate neoepitopes by adding more negative charges and may bestow novel physical and chemical properties to GAG chains. In addition, it is feasible that changes in sulfation pattern of CS/DS GAG chains may result in increased affinity for growth factors, adhesion molecule, or other cytokines that may assist in matrix repair by fibroblasts and/or myofibroblasts [79].
Alterations in expression of GAGs and their sulfation pattern could also affect at least some biologically significant events, such as inflammatory cell accumulation, cellular adhesion, migration, and proliferation [80,81,82,83,84]. SUMF1 exhibits distinct expression patterns in sputum cells obtained from both COPD patients and controls. Studies unveiled certain SNPs in the SUMF1 gene that markedly influence mRNA levels, as evidenced by an expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) analysis conducted on a lung tissue dataset. This finding was further validated through in vitro mRNA expression analyses performed on sputum cells and lung fibroblasts. Moreover, specific SUMF1 SNPs were identified to be linked to an elevated risk of COPD. Notably, these SUMF1 SNPs demonstrated divergent effects within the context of COPD. For instance, rs11915920 exerted an impact on SUMF1 mRNA expression across tissue, sputum cells, and lung fibroblasts, while the SNP rs793391 exhibited a significant association with lung function parameters, thereby implicating its role in COPD [59]. It is worth mentioning that rs793391 was not only associated with COPD in smoking/ex-smoking subjects, but also in never-smokers [61].
Furthermore, the significance of GAGs in respiratory disease has been underscored by the COVID-19 pandemic. GAGs play a role in regulating the distribution and activity of growth factors based on their degree of sulfation. When SUMF1 is mutated, highly sulfated GAGs promote the signaling of growth factor β (TGF-β), and an upregulation of TGF-β signaling has been observed in SUMF1 (−/−) mice.
Recently, SUMF1 was associated with the outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection with the rs794185 polymorphism in the SUMF1 gene being associated with the severity of COVID-19. The risk of severe COVID-19 at the rs794185 site of the SUMF1 gene was significantly reduced for TT carriers, while patients possessing at least one C allele at the rs794185 exhibited a reduced likelihood of experiencing severe COVID-19. This may be related to alveolar injury, systemic immune response, and nervous system damage caused by infection [85].
This leads to a developmental arrest in alveolar formation, reducing lung function. Transgenic mice overexpressing TGF-β between postnatal days 7 and 14 exhibited bronchopulmonary dysplastic-like lungs due to the suppression of alveolar septation. Similar results were observed in neonatal rats overexpressing TGF-β.
SUMF2, a member of the formylglycine-generating enzyme (FGE) family, plays a crucial role in catalyzing the oxidation of a specific cysteine to Cα-formylglycine [65]. Despite considerable progress in understanding the metabolic functions of pFGE (SUMF2 expression) in the past decade [55,69,70], its involvement in allergic inflammation in asthma remains poorly elucidated. Recent research by other groups has indicated the localization of SUMF2 (and SUMF1) in the luminal space of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), where synthesized sulfatases undergo post-translational modification through FGly formation. SUMF2 interacts with SUMF1 and sulfatases, influencing their activities and the FGly formation process [55,69]. Notably, human IL-13 typically undergoes post-translational modification in the ER [86] that SUMF2 may impact the modification and secretion of IL-13 in the ER [71].

6. Conclusions—Future Directions

Asthma and COPD are respiratory conditions that pose significant public health challenges. Despite their distinct nature, both diseases share common remodeling features, albeit manifesting differently in each pathology. Airway remodeling denotes the alterations in both structure and function of airway tissue resulting from persistent chronic inflammatory stimulation, leading to incomplete repair. This phenomenon is prevalent in chronic airway inflammatory conditions like asthma and COPD. It stands as a major contributor to irreversible airway narrowing and restriction of airflow. Numerous studies have delved into the examination of related proteins, both at systemic and local levels, shedding light on these intricate processes. While research into the molecular mechanisms and clinical aspects of airway remodeling has advanced swiftly in recent years, diseases primarily characterized by such remodeling, such as asthma and COPD, still exhibit high rates of prevalence, disability, and mortality.
For this reason, to understand the regulatory mechanisms that lead to the expression of remodeling-related gene products as well as the research studies which analyze the genetic variations and their relationship with the phenotype expressed, it is vital to differentiate the genetic and molecular mechanism of both illnesses and to provide more effective treatment alternatives that contribute to the improvement of the patient.
SNP databases serve as a robust tool for association studies aiming to elucidate connections between a phenotype and specific genomic regions. SUMF1 serves as the master regulator of sulfatase activity in the cell, and polymorphisms in its corresponding gene, SUMF1, have been associated with COPD, affecting the gene expression of specific splice variants [80]. Furthermore, research data indicate potential implications of SUMF1 as a therapeutic target for COPD, exploring the prospect of modulating its activity to mitigate disease severity. It is important to independently confirm the link between SUMF1 polymorphisms with both the occurrence and advancement of COPD. Exploring their potential relevance to asthma pathogenesis is also important. Should these associations prove robust, they may serve as valuable biomarkers for identifying patients who could potentially benefit from personalized prognosis and therapy. Understanding the involvement of SUMF1 in COPD pathogenesis may pave the way for innovative therapeutic strategies and targeted interventions, offering new avenues for the development of treatments that address the underlying molecular mechanisms of this debilitating respiratory condition.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.N. and A.G.; methodology, C.N.; data curation, C.N. writing—original draft preparation, C.N.; writing—review and editing, C.N., A.G., E.P., L.F. and D.S.; supervision, A.G. and D.S.; funding acquisition, D.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

We acknowledge support by the Open Access Publication Fund of the University of Freiburg.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Banno, A.; Reddy, A.T.; Lakshmi, S.P.; Reddy, R.C. Bidirectional interaction of airway epithelial remodeling and inflammation in asthma. Clin. Sci. 2020, 134, 1063–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bhatt, S.P.; Agusti, A.; Bafadhel, M.; Christenson, S.A.; Bon, J.; Donaldson, G.C.; Sin, D.D.; Wedzicha, J.A.; Martinez, F.J. Phenotypes, Etiotypes, and Endotypes of Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2023, 208, 1026–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Michaeloudes, C.; Abubakar-Waziri, H.; Lakhdar, R.; Raby, K.; Dixey, P.; Adcock, I.M.; Mumby, S.; Bhavsar, P.K.; Chung, K.F. Molecular mechanisms of oxidative stress in asthma. Mol. Asp. Med. 2022, 85, 101026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, Y.; Xu, J.; Meng, Y.; Adcock, I.M.; Yao, X. Role of inflammatory cells in airway remodeling in COPD. Int. J. Chronic Obstr. Pulm. Dis. 2018, 13, 3341–3348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Viegi, G.; Maio, S.; Fasola, S.; Baldacci, S. Global Burden of Chronic Respiratory Diseases. J. Aerosol Med. Pulm. Drug Deliv. 2020, 33, 171–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mookerjee, N.; Schmalbach, N.; Antinori, G.; Thampi, S.; Windle-Puente, D.; Gilligan, A.; Huy, H.; Andrews, M.; Sun, A.; Gandhi, R.; et al. Association of Risk Factors and Comorbidities with Chronic Pain in the Elderly Population. J. Prim. Care Community Health 2024, 15, 21501319241233463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mercado, N.; Ito, K.; Barnes, P.J. Accelerated ageing of the lung in COPD: New concepts. Thorax 2015, 70, 482–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Carvalho, M.O.S.; Souza, A.L.C.S.; Carvalho, M.B.; Pacheco, A.P.A.S.; Rocha, L.C.; Nascimento, V.M.L.D.; Figueiredo, C.V.B.; Guarda, C.C.; Santiago, R.P.; Adekile, A.; et al. Evaluation of Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Levels and SERPINA1 Gene Polymorphisms in Sickle Cell Disease. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 1491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ragland, M.F.; Benway, C.J.; Lutz, S.M.; Bowler, R.P.; Hecker, J.; Hokanson, J.E.; Crapo, J.D.; Castaldi, P.J.; DeMeo, D.L.; Hersh, C.P.; et al. Genetic Advances in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Insights from COPDGene. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2019, 200, 677–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. McDonough, J.E.; Yuan, R.; Suzuki, M.; Seyednejad, N.; Elliott, W.M.; Sanchez, P.G.; Wright, A.C.; Gefter, W.B.; Litzky, L.; Coxson, H.O.; et al. Small-Airway Obstruction and Emphysema in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011, 365, 1567–1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mebratu, Y.A.; Smith, K.R.; Agga, G.E.; Tesfaigzi, Y. Inflammation and emphysema in cigarette smoke-exposed mice when instilled with poly (I:C) or infected with influenza A or respiratory syncytial viruses. Respir. Res. 2016, 17, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Soma, T.; Nagata, M. Immunosenescence, Inflammaging, and Lung Senescence in Asthma in the Elderly. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wernersson, S.; Pejler, G. Mast cell secretory granules: Armed for battle. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2014, 14, 478–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Radermecker, C.; Sabatel, C.; Vanwinge, C.; Ruscitti, C.; Maréchal, P.; Perin, F.; Schyns, J.; Rocks, N.; Toussaint, M.; Cataldo, D.; et al. Locally instructed CXCR4hi neutrophils trigger environment-driven allergic asthma through the release of neutrophil extracellular traps. Nat. Immunol. 2019, 20, 1444–1455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Al-Muhsen, S.; Johnson, J.R.; Hamid, Q. Remodeling in asthma. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2011, 128, 451–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Hough, K.P.; Curtiss, M.L.; Blain, T.J.; Liu, R.-M.; Trevor, J.; Deshane, J.S.; Thannickal, V.J. Airway Remodeling in Asthma. Front. Med. 2020, 7, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rahman, I.; Kinnula, V.L.; Gorbunova, V.; Yao, H. SIRT1 as a therapeutic target in inflammaging of the pulmonary disease. Prev. Med. 2012, 54, S20–S28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Zhan, Y.; Huang, Q.; Deng, Z.; Chen, S.; Yang, R.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Peng, M.; Wu, J.; Gu, Y.; et al. DNA hypomethylation-mediated upregulation of GADD45B facilitates airway inflammation and epithelial cell senescence in COPD. J. Adv. Res. 2024; in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Thun, G.A.; Imboden, M.; Ferrarotti, I.; Kumar, A.; Obeidat, M.; Zorzetto, M.; Haun, M.; Curjuric, I.; Alves, A.C.; Jackson, V.E.; et al. Causal and Synthetic Associations of Variants in the SERPINA Gene Cluster with Alpha1-antitrypsin Serum Levels. PLOS Genet. 2013, 9, e1003585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Du, Y.; Zhang, H.; Xu, Y.; Ding, Y.; Chen, X.; Mei, Z.; Ding, H.; Jie, Z. Association among genetic polymorphisms of GSTP1, HO-1, and SOD-3 and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease susceptibility. SSRN Electron. J. 2019, 14, 2081–2088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Reséndiz-Hernández, J.M.; Falfán-Valencia, R. Genetic polymorphisms and their involvement in the regulation of the inflammatory response in asthma and COPD. Adv. Clin. Exp. Med. 2018, 27, 125–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tacheva, T.; Dimov, D.; Anastasov, A.; Zhelyazkova, Y.; Kurzawski, M.; Gulubova, M.; Drozdzik, M.; Vlaykova, T. Association of the MMP7-181A>G promoter polymorphism with early onset of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Balk. J. Med. Genet. 2017, 20, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Haq, I.; Chappell, S.; Johnson, S.R.; Lotya, J.; Daly, L.; Morgan, K.; Guetta-Baranes, T.; Roca, J.; Rabinovich, R.; Millar, A.B.; et al. Association of MMP-12 polymorphisms with severe and very severe COPD: A case control study of MMPs-1, 9 and 12in a European population. BMC Med. Genet. 2010, 11, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Dong, Y.; He, L.; Zhu, Z.; Yang, F.; Ma, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Liu, X. The mechanism of gut-lung axis in pulmonary fibrosis. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2024, 14, 1258246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Walma, D.A.C.; Yamada, K.M. The extracellular matrix in development. Development 2020, 147, dev175596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hoffman, E.; Song, Y.; Zhang, F.; Asarian, L.; Downs, I.; Young, B.; Han, X.; Ouyang, Y.; Xia, K.; Linhardt, R.J.; et al. Regional and disease-specific glycosaminoglycan composition and function in decellularized human lung extracellular matrix. Acta Biomater. 2023, 168, 388–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Garantziotis, S.; Savani, R.C. Hyaluronan biology: A complex balancing act of structure, function, location and context. Matrix Biol. 2019, 78–79, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Esko, J.D.; Lindahl, U. Molecular diversity of heparan sulfate. J. Clin. Investig. 2001, 108, 169–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Bülow, H.E.; Hobert, O. The Molecular Diversity of Glycosaminoglycans Shapes Animal Development. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2006, 22, 375–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Diez-Roux, G.; Ballabio, A. Sulfatases and human disease. Annu. Rev. Genom. Hum. Genet. 2005, 6, 355–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Godoy-Guzmán, C.; Martin, S.S.; Pereda, J. Proteoglycan and collagen expression during human air conducting system development. Eur. J. Histochem. 2012, 56, e29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. I Izvolsky, K.; Shoykhet, D.; Yang, Y.; Yu, Q.; A Nugent, M.; Cardoso, W.V. Heparan sulfate–FGF10 interactions during lung morphogenesis. Dev. Biol. 2003, 258, 185–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kamhi, E.; Joo, E.J.; Dordick, J.S.; Linhardt, R.J. Glycosaminoglycans in infectious disease. Biol. Rev. 2013, 88, 928–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zimmermann, P.; Zhang, Z.; Degeest, G.; Mortier, E.; Leenaerts, I.; Coomans, C.; Schulz, J.; N’kuli, F.; Courtoy, P.J.; David, G. Syndecan Recyling Is Controlled by Syntenin-PIP2 Interaction and Arf6. Dev. Cell 2005, 9, 377–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Thompson, S.; Martínez-Burgo, B.; Sepuru, K.M.; Rajarathnam, K.; Kirby, J.A.; Sheerin, N.S.; Ali, S. Regulation of Chemokine Function: The Roles of GAG-Binding and Post-Translational Nitration. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Papakonstantinou, E.; Klagas, I.; Roth, M.; Tamm, M.; Stolz, D. Acute Exacerbations of COPD Are Associated with Increased Expression of Heparan Sulfate and Chondroitin Sulfate in BAL. Chest 2016, 149, 685–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Smits, N.C.; Shworak, N.W.; Dekhuijzen, P.R.; van Kuppevelt, T.H. Heparan Sulfates in the Lung: Structure, Diversity, and Role in Pulmonary Emphysema. Anat. Rec. 2010, 293, 955–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Shannon, J.M.; McCormick-Shannon, K.; Burhans, M.S.; Shangguan, X.; Srivastava, K.; Hyatt, B.A. Chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans are required for lung growth and morphogenesis in vitro. Am. J. Physiol. Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2003, 285, L1323–L1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Srinoulprasert, Y.; Kongtawelert, P.; Chaiyaroj, S.C. Chondroitin sulfate B and heparin mediate adhesion of Penicillium marneffei conidia to host extracellular matrices. Microb. Pathog. 2006, 40, 126–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Rosen, S.D.; Lemjabbar-Alaoui, H. Sulf-2: An extracellular modulator of cell signaling and a cancer target candidate. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 2010, 14, 935–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Hossain, M.; Hosono-Fukao, T.; Tang, R.; Sugaya, N.; van Kuppevelt, T.H.; Jenniskens, G.J.; Kimata, K.; Rosen, S.D.; Uchimura, K. Direct detection of HSulf-1 and HSulf-2 activities on extracellular heparan sulfate and their inhibition by PI-88. Glycobiology 2009, 20, 175–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Tang, R.; Rosen, S.D. Functional Consequences of the Subdomain Organization of the Sulfs. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 21505–21514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Morimoto-Tomita, M.; Uchimura, K.; Werb, Z.; Hemmerich, S.; Rosen, S.D. Cloning and characterisation of two extracellular heparin-degrading endosulfatases in mice and humans. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 49175–49185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Ohto, T.; Uchida, H.; Yamazaki, H.; Keino-Masu, K.; Matsui, A.; Masu, M. Identification of a novel nonlysosomal sulphatase expressed in the floor plate, choroid plexus and cartilate. Genes Cells 2002, 7, 173–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Ambasta, R.K.; Ai, X.; Emerson, C.P. Quail Sulf1 Function Requires Asparagine-linked Glycosylation. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 34492–34499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kim, T.H.; Banini, B.A.; Asumda, F.Z.; Campbell, N.A.; Hu, C.; Moser, C.D.; Shire, A.M.; Han, S.; Ma, C.; Krishnan, A.; et al. Knockout of sulfatase 2 is associated with decreased steatohepatitis and fibrosis in a mouse model of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Am. J. Physiol. Liver Physiol. 2020, 319, 333–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Nakamura, I.; Asumda, F.Z.; Moser, C.D.; Kang, Y.N.N.; Lai, J.-P.; Roberts, L.R. Sulfatase-2 Regulates Liver Fibrosis through the TGF-β Signaling Pathway. Cancers 2021, 13, 5279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Okada, T.; Keino-Masu, K.; Nagamine, S.; Kametani, F.; Ohto, T.; Hasegawa, M.; van Kuppevelt, T.H.; Kunita, S.; Takahashi, S.; Masu, M. Desulfation of Heparan Sulfate by Sulf1 and Sulf2 Is Required for Corticospinal Tract Formation. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 13847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Cosma, M.P.; Pepe, S.; Annunziata, I.; Newbold, R.F.; Grompe, M.; Parenti, G.; Ballabio, A. The Multiple Sulfatase Deficiency Gene Encodes an Essential and Limiting Factor for the Activity of Sulfatases. Cell 2003, 113, 445–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Dierks, T.; Schmidt, B.; Borissenko, L.V.; Peng, J.; Preusser, A.; Mariappan, M.; Von Figura, K. Multiple Sulfatase Deficiency Is Caused by Mutations in the Gene Encoding the Human C-Formylglycine Generating Enzyme thyosis, and chondrodysplasia punctata (Hopwood and Ballabio, 2001). Mammalian cells synthesize sulfatases at ribosomes bound to the endoplasmic reticulum. During or shortly after protein translocation and while the sulfatase poly-of P23 with extracts from microsomes of bovine pan. Cell 2003, 113, 435–444. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  51. Schmidt, B.; Selmer, T.; Ingendoh, A.; von Figurat, K. A novel amino acid modification in sulfatases that is defective in multiple sulfatase deficiency. Cell 1995, 82, 271–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zito, E.; Fraldi, A.; Pepe, S.; Annunziata, I.; Kobinger, G.; Di Natale, P.; Ballabio, A.; Cosma, M.P. Sulphatase activities are regulated by the interaction of sulphatase-modifying factor 1 with SUMF2. Embo Rep. 2005, 6, 655–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Caird, R.; Williamson, M.; Yusuf, A.; Gogoi, D.; Casey, M.; McElvaney, N.G.; Reeves, E.P. Targeting of Glycosaminoglycans in Genetic and Inflammatory Airway Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 6400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Fraldi, A.; Biffi, A.; Lombardi, A.; Visigalli, I.; Pepe, S.; Settembre, C.; Nusco, E.; Auricchio, A.; Naldini, L.; Ballabio, A.; et al. SUMF1 enhances sulfatase activities in vivo in five sulfatase deficiencies. Biochem. J. 2007, 403, 305–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Zito, E.; Buono, M.; Pepe, S.; Settembre, C.; Annunziata, I.; Surace, E.M.; Dierks, T.; Monti, M.; Cozzolino, M.; Pucci, P.; et al. Sulfatase modifying factor 1 trafficking through the cells: From endoplasmic reticulum to the endoplasmic reticulum. EMBO J. 2007, 26, 2443–2453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Settembre, C.; Arteaga-Solis, E.; McKee, M.D.; de Pablo, R.; Al Awqati, Q.; Ballabio, A.; Karsenty, G. Proteoglycan desulfation determines the efficiency of chondrocyte autophagy and the extent of FGF signaling during endochondral ossification. Genes Dev. 2008, 22, 2645–2650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Settembre, C.; Annunziata, I.; Spampanato, C.; Zarcone, D.; Cobellis, G.; Nusco, E.; Zito, E.; Tacchetti, C.; Cosma, M.P.; Ballabio, A. Systemic inflammation and neurodegeneration in a mouse model of multiple sulfatase deficiency. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 4506–4511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Arteaga-Solis, E.; Settembre, C.; Ballabio, A.; Karsenty, G. Sulfatases are determinants of alveolar formation. Matrix Biol. 2012, 31, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Weidner, J.; Jarenbäck, L.; de Jong, K.; Vonk, J.M.; Berge, M.v.D.; Brandsma, C.-A.; Boezen, H.M.; Sin, D.; Bossé, Y.; Nickle, D.; et al. Sulfatase modifying factor 1 (SUMF1) is associated with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Respir. Res. 2017, 18, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Roth-Kleiner, M.; Post, M. Similarities and dissimilarities of branching and septation during lung development. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 2005, 40, 113–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Jarenbäck, L.; Frantz, S.; Weidner, J.; Ankerst, J.; Nihlén, U.; Bjermer, L.; Wollmer, P.; Tufvesson, E. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the sulfatase-modifying factor 1 gene are associated with lung function and COPD. ERJ Open Res. 2022, 8, 00668–2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Lee, J.H.; McDonald, M.-L.N.; Cho, M.H.; Wan, E.S.; Castaldi, P.J.; Hunninghake, G.M.; Marchetti, N.; A Lynch, D.; Crapo, J.D.; A Lomas, D.; et al. DNAH5 is associated with total lung capacity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir. Res. 2014, 15, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Dierks, T.; Dickmanns, A.; Preusser-Kunze, A.; Schmidt, B.; Mariappan, M.; von Figura, K.; Ficner, R.; Rudolph, M.G. Molecular Basis for Multiple Sulfatase Deficiency and Mechanism for Formylglycine Generation of the Human Formylglycine-Generating Enzyme. Cell 2005, 121, 541–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Schlotawa, L.; Ennemann, E.C.; Radhakrishnan, K.; Schmidt, B.; Chakrapani, A.; Christen, H.-J.; Moser, H.; Steinmann, B.; Dierks, T.; Gärtner, J. SUMF1 mutations affecting stability and activity of formylglycine generating enzyme predict clinical outcome in multiple sulfatase deficiency. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2011, 19, 253–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Dickmanns, A.; Schmidt, B.; Rudolph, M.G.; Mariappan, M.; Dierks, T.; von Figura, K.; Ficner, R. Crystal Structure of Human pFGE, the Paralog of the Cα-formylglycine-generating Enzyme. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 15180–15187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Dong, C.; Beecham, A.; Wang, L.; Slifer, S.; Wright, C.B.; Blanton, S.H.; Rundek, T.; Sacco, R.L. Genetic loci for blood lipid levels identified by linkage and association analyses in Caribbean Hispanics. J. Lipid Res. 2011, 52, 1411–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ferguson, J.F.; Meyer, N.J.; Qu, L.; Xue, C.; Liu, Y.; DerOhannessian, S.L.; Rushefski, M.; Paschos, G.K.; Tang, S.; Schadt, E.E.; et al. Integrative genomics identifies 7p11.2 as a novel locus for fever and clinical stress response in humans. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2014, 24, 1801–1812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Gande, S.L.; Mariappan, M.; Schmidt, B.; Pringle, T.H.; von Figura, K.; Dierks, T. Paralog of the formylglycine-generating enzyme–retention in the endoplasmic reticulum by canonical and noncanonical signals. FEBS J. 2008, 275, 1118–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Mariappan, M.; Preusser-Kunze, A.; Balleininger, M.; Eiselt, N.; Schmidt, B.; Gande, S.L.; Wenzel, D.; Dierks, T.; von Figura, K. Expression, Localization, Structural, and Functional Characterization of pFGE, the Paralog of the Cα-Formylglycine-generating Enzyme. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 15173–15179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Preusser-Kunze, A.; Mariappan, M.; Schmidt, B.; Gande, S.L.; Mutenda, K.; Wenzel, D.; von Figura, K.; Dierks, T. Molecular Characterization of the Human Cα-formylglycine-generating Enzyme. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 14900–14910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Liang, H.; Li, Z.; Xue, L.; Jiang, X.; Liu, F. SUMF2 interacts with interleukin-13 and inhibits interleukin-13 secretion in bronchial smooth muscle cells. J. Cell. Biochem. 2009, 108, 1076–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Royce, S.G.; Tan, L.; Koek, A.A.; Tang, M.L. Effect of extracellular matrix composition on airway epithelial cell and fibroblast structure: Implications for airway remodeling in asthma. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2009, 102, 238–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Farooq, M.; Khan, A.W.; Kim, M.S.; Choi, S. The Role of Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF) Signaling in Tissue Repair and Regeneration. Cells 2021, 10, 3242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Guzy, R.D.; Stoilov, I.; Elton, T.J.; Mecham, R.P.; Ornitz, D.M. Fibroblast Growth Factor 2 Is Required for Epithelial Recovery, but Not for Pulmonary Fibrosis, in Response to Bleomycin. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2015, 52, 116–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Yang, D.; Wang, L.; Jiang, P.; Kang, R.; Xie, Y. Correlation between hs-CRP, IL-6, IL-10, ET-1, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Combined with Pulmonary Hypertension. J. Healthc. Eng. 2022, 2022, 3247807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Kranenburg, A.R.; Willems-Widyastuti, A.; Mooi, W.J.; Saxena, P.R.; Sterk, P.J.; I de Boer, W.; Sharma, H.S. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is associated with enhanced bronchial expression of FGF-1, FGF-2, and FGFR-1. J. Pathol. 2005, 206, 28–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Yang, L.; Zhou, F.; Zheng, D.; Wang, D.; Li, X.; Zhao, C.; Huang, X. FGF/FGFR signaling: From lung development to respiratory diseases. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2021, 62, 94–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Papakonstantinou, E.; Karakiulakis, G. The ‘sweet’ and ‘bitter’ involvement of glycosaminoglycans in lung diseases: Pharmacotherapeutic relevance. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2009, 157, 1111–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Mizumoto, S.; Fongmoon, D.; Sugahara, K. Interaction of chondroitin sulfate and dermatan sulfate from various biological sources with heparin-binding growth factors and cytokines. Glycoconj. J. 2013, 30, 619–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Hwang, H.-Y.; Olson, S.K.; Esko, J.D.; Horvitz, H.R. Caenorhabditis elegans early embryogenesis and vulval morphogenesis require chondroitin biosynthesis. Nature 2003, 423, 439–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Iozzo, R.V. MATRIX PROTEOGLYCANS: From Molecular Design to Cellular Function. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1998, 67, 609–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Kai, Y.; Yoneyama, H.; Koyama, J.; Hamada, K.; Kimura, H.; Matsushima, K. Treatment with chondroitinase ABC alleviates bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis. Med. Mol. Morphol. 2007, 40, 128–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Mizuguchi, S.; Uyama, T.; Kitagawa, H.; Nomura, K.H.; Dejima, K.; Gengyo-Ando, K.; Mitani, S.; Sugahara, K.; Nomura, K. Chondroitin proteoglycans are involved in cell division of Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 2003, 423, 443–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Souza-Fernandes, A.B.; Pelosi, P.; Rocco, P.R. Bench-to-bedside review: The role of glycosaminoglycans in respiratory disease. Crit. Care 2006, 10, 237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Liang, S.; Gao, H.; He, T.; Li, L.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, L.; Chen, J.; Xie, Y.; Bao, J.; Gao, Y.; et al. Association between SUMF1 polymorphisms and COVID-19 severity. BMC Genet. 2023, 24, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. McKenzie, A.N.; Li, X.; A Largaespada, D.; Sato, A.; Kaneda, A.; Zurawski, S.M.; Doyle, E.L.; Milatovich, A.; Francke, U.; Copeland, N.G. Structural comparison and chromosomal localization of the human and mouse IL-13 genes. J. Immunol. 1993, 150, 5436–5444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Protein–protein interaction (PPI) diagram. STRING database (https://string-db.org, assessed on 10 February 2024) was used to identify the interactions between the molecules. The pink lines represent experimentally determined interactions among the proteins. SUMF1: Formylglycine-generating enzyme; Oxidase that catalyzes the conversion of cysteine to 3-oxoalanine on target proteins, using molecular oxygen and an unidentified reducing agent. 3-oxoalanine modification, which is also named formylglycine (fGly), occurs in the maturation of arylsulfatases and some alkaline phosphatases that use the hydrated form of 3-oxoalanine as a catalytic nucleophile. Known substrates include GALNS, ARSA, STS and ARSE. Belongs to the sulfatase-modifying factor family. (374 aa). SUMF2: Inactive C-alpha-formylglycine-generating enzyme 2; Lacks formylglycine generating activity and is unable to convert newly synthe. GNS: N-acetylglucosamine-6-sulfatase; Glucosamine-6-sulfatase; Belongs to the sulfatase family. ARSA: Arylsulfatase A component B; Hydrolyzes cerebroside sulfate. CTRC: Chymotrypsin-C; Regulates activation and degradation of trypsinogens and procarboxypeptidases by targeting specific cleavage s SGSH: N-sulphoglucosamine sulphohydrolase; Catalyzes a step in lysosomal heparan sulfate degradation. Belongs to the sulfatase family IDS: Iduronate 2-sulfatase 14 kDa chain; Lysosomal enzyme involved in the degradation pathway of dermatan sulfate and heparan sulfate.
Figure 1. Protein–protein interaction (PPI) diagram. STRING database (https://string-db.org, assessed on 10 February 2024) was used to identify the interactions between the molecules. The pink lines represent experimentally determined interactions among the proteins. SUMF1: Formylglycine-generating enzyme; Oxidase that catalyzes the conversion of cysteine to 3-oxoalanine on target proteins, using molecular oxygen and an unidentified reducing agent. 3-oxoalanine modification, which is also named formylglycine (fGly), occurs in the maturation of arylsulfatases and some alkaline phosphatases that use the hydrated form of 3-oxoalanine as a catalytic nucleophile. Known substrates include GALNS, ARSA, STS and ARSE. Belongs to the sulfatase-modifying factor family. (374 aa). SUMF2: Inactive C-alpha-formylglycine-generating enzyme 2; Lacks formylglycine generating activity and is unable to convert newly synthe. GNS: N-acetylglucosamine-6-sulfatase; Glucosamine-6-sulfatase; Belongs to the sulfatase family. ARSA: Arylsulfatase A component B; Hydrolyzes cerebroside sulfate. CTRC: Chymotrypsin-C; Regulates activation and degradation of trypsinogens and procarboxypeptidases by targeting specific cleavage s SGSH: N-sulphoglucosamine sulphohydrolase; Catalyzes a step in lysosomal heparan sulfate degradation. Belongs to the sulfatase family IDS: Iduronate 2-sulfatase 14 kDa chain; Lysosomal enzyme involved in the degradation pathway of dermatan sulfate and heparan sulfate.
Jpm 14 00248 g001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ntenti, C.; Papakonstantinou, E.; Fidani, L.; Stolz, D.; Goulas, A. The Genetics behind Sulfation: Impact on Airway Remodeling. J. Pers. Med. 2024, 14, 248. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14030248

AMA Style

Ntenti C, Papakonstantinou E, Fidani L, Stolz D, Goulas A. The Genetics behind Sulfation: Impact on Airway Remodeling. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 2024; 14(3):248. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14030248

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ntenti, Charikleia, Eleni Papakonstantinou, Liana Fidani, Daiana Stolz, and Antonis Goulas. 2024. "The Genetics behind Sulfation: Impact on Airway Remodeling" Journal of Personalized Medicine 14, no. 3: 248. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14030248

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop