Next Article in Journal
Minimum 2-Year Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Unrestricted Kinematic Alignment Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients with Excessive Varus of the Tibia Component
Next Article in Special Issue
The Application of DTCWT on MRI-Derived Radiomics for Differentiation of Glioblastoma and Solitary Brain Metastases
Previous Article in Journal
Functional Independence of Taiwanese Children with Osteogenesis Imperfecta
Previous Article in Special Issue
Deep Learning to Detect Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Injury in Wrist MRI: Retrospective Study with Internal and External Validation
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Identification of Early Esophageal Cancer by Semantic Segmentation

J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12(8), 1204; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12081204
by Yu-Jen Fang 1,2, Arvind Mukundan 3, Yu-Ming Tsao 3,4, Chien-Wei Huang 5,6,* and Hsiang-Chen Wang 3,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12(8), 1204; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12081204
Submission received: 29 May 2022 / Revised: 19 July 2022 / Accepted: 22 July 2022 / Published: 25 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Artificial Intelligence Application in Health Care System)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The paragraph 2.1.2 Network Architecture must be extended due to its great importance. The readers should be able to understand enterely the applied procedure, for possible comparison or new applications and improvement

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

In this paper, Fang YJ et al has demonstrated how to make the better prediction with accuracy of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by using the concept of semantic segmentation and U-Net as the basic artificial neural network. Recently, With the help of deep learning architectures like U-Net and CANet, scientist can achieve high-quality results on computer vision datasets to perform complex tasks. Here authors used several narrowband and white light imaging of endoscopic images for Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD). Although authors did not mention about the source of the images. If these are the publicly available data, authors should include the link in the manuscript as the data source. Authors should be more careful about the languages and construction of the sentences. After addressing these points, the manuscript can be considered for the publication.

Page 1, Line 43. What does it mean of the following sentence? -“At present, doctors can-not deduct from the endoscopy of EC”

Authors mentioned, “The precision of dysplasia and SCC categories was 85.67%, which was higher than 174 the accuracy of the normal category” Are these percentages generated from the several images of each category? How many images were included in each group?

What are the inclusion and exclusion criteria for choosing images?

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop