Comment on Rosenzweig et al. Very Low Prostate PET/CT PSMA Uptake May Be Misleading in Staging Radical Prostatectomy Candidates. J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12, 410
Excerpt
With interest, we read the article by Rosenzweig et al. [...]
Share and Cite
Veerman, H.; Vis, A.N.; Donswijk, M.; van der Poel, H.G. Comment on Rosenzweig et al. Very Low Prostate PET/CT PSMA Uptake May Be Misleading in Staging Radical Prostatectomy Candidates. J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12, 410. J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12, 800. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12050800
Veerman H, Vis AN, Donswijk M, van der Poel HG. Comment on Rosenzweig et al. Very Low Prostate PET/CT PSMA Uptake May Be Misleading in Staging Radical Prostatectomy Candidates. J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12, 410. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 2022; 12(5):800. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12050800
Chicago/Turabian StyleVeerman, Hans, André N. Vis, Maarten Donswijk, and Henk G. van der Poel. 2022. "Comment on Rosenzweig et al. Very Low Prostate PET/CT PSMA Uptake May Be Misleading in Staging Radical Prostatectomy Candidates. J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12, 410" Journal of Personalized Medicine 12, no. 5: 800. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12050800
APA StyleVeerman, H., Vis, A. N., Donswijk, M., & van der Poel, H. G. (2022). Comment on Rosenzweig et al. Very Low Prostate PET/CT PSMA Uptake May Be Misleading in Staging Radical Prostatectomy Candidates. J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12, 410. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 12(5), 800. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12050800

