PPARG, TMEM163, UBE2E2, and WFS1 Gene Polymorphisms Are Not Significant Risk Factors for Gestational Diabetes in the Polish Population
by
, , , and
Przemysław Ustianowski
1, 
Damian Malinowski
2,
Krzysztof Safranow
3,
Violetta Dziedziejko
3,
Maciej Tarnowski
4 and
Andrzej Pawlik
4,* 1
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pomeranian Medical University, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland
2
Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Pomeranian Medical University, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland
3
Department of Biochemistry and Medical Chemistry, Pomeranian Medical University, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland
4
Department of Physiology, Pomeranian Medical University, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12(2), 243; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12020243
Submission received: 29 November 2021
/
Revised: 3 February 2022
/
Accepted: 3 February 2022
/
Published: 8 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pregnancy Complication and Precision Medicine)
Abstract
:Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a common disorder that occurs in pregnant women, leading to many maternal and neonatal complications. The pathogenesis of GDM is complex and includes risk factors, such as: age, obesity, and family history of diabetes. Studies have shown that genetic factors also play a role in the pathogenesis of GDM. The present study investigated whether polymorphisms in the PPARG (rs1801282), TMEM163 (rs6723108 and rs998451), UBE2E2 (rs6780569), and WFS1 (rs4689388) genes are risk factors for the development of GDM and whether they affect selected clinical parameters in women with GDM. This study included 204 pregnant women with GDM and 207 pregnant women with normal glucose tolerance (NGT). The diagnosis of GDM was based on a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at 24–28 weeks gestation, according to the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria. There were no statistically significant differences in the distribution of polymorphisms studied between women with GDM and pregnant women with normal carbohydrate tolerance, which suggests that these polymorphisms are not risk factors for GDM. We also examined the associations between studied gene polymorphisms and clinical parameters: fasting glucose, daily insulin requirement, body mass before pregnancy, body mass at birth, body mass increase during pregnancy, BMI before pregnancy, BMI at birth, BMI increase during pregnancy, new-born body mass, and APGAR score in women with GDM. We observed lower BMI values before pregnancy and at birth in women with PPARG rs17036160 TT genotype. The results of this study suggest that the PPARG (rs1801282), TMEM163 (rs6723108 and rs998451), UBE2E2 (rs6780569), and WFS1 (rs4689388) gene polymorphisms are not significant risk factors for GDM development in the Polish population and do not affect the clinical parameters in women with GDM; only rs1801282 of the PPARG gene may influence BMI values in women with GDM.
1. Introduction
Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is carbohydrate intolerance occurring in pregnant women. GDM may lead to various metabolic complications; therefore, factors causing a predisposition for the development of GDM are being investigated [1]. GDM occurs in about 14% of pregnancies worldwide, which represents about 18 million cases per year [2]. GDM is characterized by the inability of pancreatic beta cells to respond adequately to increased insulin requirements during pregnancy, resulting in varying degrees of hyperglycemia [2]. Pancreatic beta cell dysfunction is considered to be the result of prolonged, excessive insulin production. The pathogenesis of GDM is complex and includes risk factors, such as age, obesity, and family history of diabetes [2,3,4,5]. In women with GDM, both impaired insulin secretion and insulin resistance was observed [2,3,4,6]. Each of the risk factors are associated with impaired insulin production or reduced insulin sensitivity. For example, overweight and obesity are associated with excessive insulin production and chronic inflammation.
GDM is characterized by chronic inflammation that negatively influences the fetus. Elevated expression of inflammatory mediators was also found in the placentas of women with GDM, especially those with obesity [5]. Hyperglycemia is associated with a well-documented array of adverse maternal and fetal consequences. Children born to mothers with GDM are at increased risk for a number of direct complications including preterm birth, macrosomia, respiratory failure, joint abnormalities, and neonatal hypoglycemia [2,3,4]. Women with GDM have an increased risk of a number of serious perinatal complications, including gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia, preterm birth, and the development of type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Studies suggest that the risk of developing T2DM in women with GDM may be up to seven times higher than in women with normal glucose tolerance. Approximately 60% of women with a history of GDM develop T2DM. The observed insulin resistance and impaired insulin secretion are similar to those in T2DM [3,5]. The significant prevalence of T2DM in women with previous GDM raises the possibility that there is a common genetic basis. Many genes related to pancreatic beta cell development, function, and survival have been identified as affecting T2DM and GDM risk in association studies.
Previous studies have shown that some genetic loci causing a predisposition for the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus may also cause a predisposition for GDM [7,8].
The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors-γ (PPARG) is the transcription factor belonging to the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily. PPARG regulates carbohydrate and lipid metabolism, fatty acid transport, adipocyte differentiation, and inflammation [9]. The expression of PPARG was detected mainly in adipose tissue. Previous studies indicated a significant role of PPARG and PPARG gene polymorphisms in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes [10,11,12].
TMEM163 is a 31.5 kDa protein that binds cations, such as zinc. Previous studies suggest the involvement of TMEM163 in insulin secretion and type 2 diabetes pathogenesis. It has been shown that TMEM163 expression in MIN6 cells correlated with decreased insulin secretion and expression of genes involved in glucose metabolism [13]. Moreover, TMEM163 mRNA expression in human pancreatic tissue from patients with type 2 diabetes was significantly increased [13,14]. TMEM163 was associated with a high glycemic index and fasting plasma insulin level.
UBE2E2 encodes ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2E2, which plays an important role in the synthesis and secretion of insulin. UBE2E2 is expressed in the pancreas, liver, and adipose tissue. Previous studies indicated the role of UBE2E2 and UBE2E2 gene polymorphisms in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes [15,16].
The WFS1 gene is associated with Wolfram syndrome (diabetes insipidus, diabetes mellitus, optic atrophy, and deafness). Recently, this gene was investigated as a genetic factor for the predisposition to type 1 and type 2 diabetes development. WFS1 was included as a candidate gene evaluated for association with type 2 diabetes [17,18].
In this study, we examined polymorphisms in the PPARG (rs1801282), TMEM163 (rs6723108 and rs998451), UBE2E2 (rs6780569), and WFS1 (rs4689388) genes in women with GDM. We aimed to investigate whether these polymorphisms affect the risk of developing GDM and whether they influence clinical parameters in women with GDM. We compared the distribution of polymorphisms studied between women with GDM and women with normal glucose tolerance during pregnancy, and assessed the correlations between the genotypes studied and selected clinical parameters.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Participants
This case–control association study included 204 pregnant women with GDM and 207 pregnant women with normal glucose tolerance (NGT) treated in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland. Women with multi-fetal pregnancy, other complications of pregnancy, and those who did not give their consent for the study were not included. The diagnosis of GDM was based on a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at 24–28 weeks gestation, according to the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria [19]. The diagnosis of GDM was made when one of the following plasma glucose values in the OGTT was met or exceeded: fasting plasma glucose of 92 mg/dL (5.1 mmol/L), 1 h plasma glucose of 180 mg/dL (10.0 mmol/L), or 2 h plasma glucose of 153 mg/dL (8.5 mmol/L). Exclusion criteria were: type 1 and type 2 diabetes, autoimmune and inflammatory diseases, neoplasmatic diseases, and chronic infections. All pregnancies were achieved by natural conception. Among the pregnant women with GDM, 78% of them were treated with diet control alone throughout their pregnancies, while the remaining 22% were treated with diet control and insulin until delivery. All pregnant women were without any acute or chronic complications, such as diabetic ketoacidosis or other disorders affecting glucose metabolism. The subjects were educated about this study. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland (KB-0012/40/14).
2.2. Methods
All samples were genotyped in duplicate using allelic discrimination assays with TaqMan® probes (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA) on a 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR Detection System (Applied Biosystems). In order to discriminate the polymorphisms, we employed TaqMan® Pre-Designed SNP Genotyping Assays, including appropriate primers and fluorescently labelled (FAM and VIC) MGB™ probes to detect the alleles.
2.3. Statistical Analysis
The consistency of the genotype distribution with Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) was assessed using the exact test. A chi-square test was used to compare the genotype and allele distributions between the groups. Distributions of most of the quantitative variables were significantly different from normal distribution (Shapiro–Wilk test), so they were compared between the genotype groups using the non-parametric Mann–Whitney U test. Data were presented as median and interquartile range (IQR). Multivariate logistic regression model adjusted for age and pre-gestational BMI, which are known risk factors of GDM, was used to find whether each polymorphic allele is an independent risk factor of GDM. p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The study with 204 patients and 207 controls has the statistical power sufficient to detect with 80% probability true effect sizes corresponding to odds ratio (OR) for allelic association equal to 0.20 or 2.48 for UBE2E2 rs6780569, 0.35 or 2.09 for PPARG rs17036160, 0.52 or 1.78 for TMEM163 rs6723108 and rs998451, and 0.57 or 1.74 for WFS1 rs4689388.
3. Results
The distributions of the studied polymorphisms were in the HWE (p > 0.05). The distributions of studied polymorphisms in women with GDM and control women are shown in Table 1. As shown in Table 1, there are no statistically significant differences in the distribution of studied gene polymorphisms between women with GDM and pregnant women with normal carbohydrate tolerance. None of the five analyzed SNPs were a significant independent predictor of GDM in logistic regression models adjusted for age and BMI (p > 0.05), while older age and higher BMI were, as expected, strongly associated with GDM risk (p < 0.00003 for age and p < 0.0002 for BMI).
We also examined the associations between the studied gene polymorphisms and clinical parameters, such as fasting glucose, daily insulin requirement, body mass before pregnancy, body mass at birth, body mass increase during pregnancy, BMI before pregnancy, BMI at birth, BMI increase during pregnancy, new-born body mass, and APGAR score in women with GDM (Table 2, Table 3, Table 4, Table 5 and Table 6).
The majority of associations between the above parameters and studied polymorphisms were statistically non-significant. We only observed lower BMI values before pregnancy and at birth in women with PPARG rs17036160 TT genotype.
4. Discussion
GDM is a disorder of carbohydrate metabolism that occurs in pregnant women. The pathogenesis of this disease is complex. GDM is caused by impaired insulin secretion in pancreatic beta islands, as well as chronic inflammation and tissue insulin resistance. Several environmental and genetic factors cause a predisposition to GDM, including a family history of type 2 diabetes, obesity, female age, and pre-pregnancy carbohydrate metabolism disorders [1,3]. Due to the numerous maternal and fetal complications of GDM, factors that increase the risk of developing this disease are being investigated. Identification of these factors could be helpful in early diagnosis and in identifying women who are at increased risk of GDM developing. This would allow for earlier implementation of prevention and treatment. A number of genetic factors are currently being considered that may cause a predisposition to GDM [2,3]. Since the pathogenesis of GDM is similar to that of type 2 diabetes, genes that increase the risk of type 2 diabetes have been studied [5,8]. These factors may include polymorphisms of genes affecting pancreatic beta-cell function, insulin resistance, carbohydrate and lipid metabolism, and inflammation [5,7]. These polymorphisms can affect gene expression and, thus, the amount of protein synthesis they regulate. Inter-individual differences in the expression of these genes may affect processes involved in insulin release and carbohydrate metabolism and, thereby, increase the risk of GDM.
In this study, we examined the association between PPARG (rs1801282), TMEM163 (rs6723108, rs998451), UBE2E2 (rs6780569), and WFS1 (rs4689388) gene polymorphisms and GDM. To date, the association between these polymorphisms and GDM in the Caucasian population has not been investigated. Our results did not show that these gene polymorphisms were associated with the risk of developing GDM. We also examined the association between the polymorphisms studied and clinical parameters in women. These associations were not statistically significant. We only observed a statistically significant association between PPARG gene polymorphism and BMI values before pregnancy and at birth.
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) is a nuclear hormone receptor expressed mainly in adipose tissue [20]. Its activation causes binding of specific DNA elements and induction of a transcriptional cascade that leads to adipocyte differentiation and increased insulin sensitivity. Previous studies indicate an important role for PPARG in diseases, such as obesity and diabetes [20,21,22,23,24]. In obesity, PPARG regulates adipocyte maturation and differentiation. It is an essential factor for the adipocyte differentiation process and, thus, acts as a regulator of adipogenesis. In addition, PPARG plays an important role in the process of insulin resistance. Mice lacking the PPARG gene in muscle are insulin resistant. In adipose tissue, PPARG deletion leads to lipoatrophy and insulin resistance (IR) [20]. Lendvai et al. demonstrated that maternal nutrition can affect PPARG gene methylation and foetal and placenta development [25]. Wojcik et al. have shown the correlation between leukocyte PPARG overexpression and hyperglycemia, suggesting that PPARG mRNA expression in these cells might be up-regulated in high-glucose conditions in GDM patients during gestation [26].
Previous studies investigated the associations between PPARG gene rs1801282 polymorphism and GDM in various populations. In the meta-analysis, Wu et al. have shown that the rs1801282 polymorphism in the PPARG gene correlated significantly with a risk of GDM in Asian populations [27]. Additionally, the study conducted in a Brazilian population suggests a significant association between PPARG gene rs1801282 polymorphism and GDM [28]. In the meta-analysis by Wang et al., PPARG gene rs1801282 polymorphism was associated significantly with the GDM risks in East Asians, while no significant associations were detected among Caucasian and Middle Eastern populations [29]. The meta-analysis by Mao et al., including 11 studies, showed a lack of statistically significant association between PPARG gene rs1801282 polymorphism and GDM both in Caucasian and East Asian populations [30].
TMEM163 is a cation transport protein involved in insulin secretion in pancreatic beta-cells. It has been shown that patients with T2DM may have a mutation in this gene leading to reduced insulin secretion [13]. TMEM163 gene polymorphisms were investigated in T2DM patients in various populations, however the results are inconsistent. Tabassum et al. suggest an association between TMEM163 gene rs998451 and rs6723108 polymorphisms and type 2diabetes and insulin secretion in Indian population [31]. However, these associations were not confirmed in another study conducted in a northwestern India population [32]. Bai et al. indicated that the TMEM163 gene rs6723108 polymorphism is associated with T2DM in Mongolian but not Caucasian populations [33]. Tabassum et al. have shown that TMEM163 gene variants showed association with decreased fasting plasma insulin and insulin resistance, indicating an effect through impaired insulin secretion [31]. Tan et al. examined the association between TMEM163 gene rs998451 polymorphisms and the risk of GDM, as well as fasting insulin levels [34]. The results suggest a lack of a statistically significant association between TMEM163 gene rs998451 polymorphism and GDM in Chinese populations [34]. The results of our study also suggest a lack of statistically significant association between TMEM163 gene rs998451 and rs6723108 polymorphisms and risk of GDM, as well as some clinical parameters in women with GDM in the Polish population.
The ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2E2 (UBE2E2 gene) plays an important role in insulin synthesis and secretion. Previous studies indicated the association between UBE2E2 gene polymorphism and diabetes in various population [15]. Kazakova et al. suggests the association between UBE2E2 gene rs7612463 polymorphism and T2DM in the Chinese population [15]. Similar results obtained Zeng et al., who suggest the association between UBE2E2 gene polymorphism, obesity, and T2DM [35]. Moreover, UBE2E2 gene rs7119 polymorphisms correlated with insulin release after glucose stimulation in elderly Chinese Han individuals [16]. These observations were not confirmed in other Asian populations (Japanese, Thai, and Saudi) where no statistically significant associations between UBE2E2 gene polymorphisms and T2DM were found [36,37,38].
Kim et al. examined UBE2E2 gene rs6780569 and rs7612463 polymorphisms in Korean women with GDM [39]. These authors suggest that these polymorphisms are associated with fasting plasma glucose. Moreover, rs7612463 polymorphisms were associated with GDM risk in Korean women [39]. The results of our study suggest lack of statistically significant association between UBE2E2 gene rs6780569 polymorphism and fasting plasma glucose and GDM risk in our Caucasian population.
WFS1 gene is considered as genetic factor causing a predisposition to type 1 and type 2 diabetes in different populations [40,41]. The protein encoded by the WFS1 gene—Wolframin—causes increased apoptosis and dysfunction of pancreatic beta cells. A number of studies have investigated the association between WFS1 gene polymorphism and insulin secretion, insulinemia, insulin sensitivity, as well as risk of hyperglycemia and T2DM [42,43,44,45]. The results of studies suggest that the WFS1 gene may be the candidate gene for type 2 diabetes [41,46]. Long et al. suggest that WFS1 gene polymorphisms may be associated with T2DM risk in African-American populations [47]. To date, no association of the WFS1 gene polymorphism with GDM has been demonstrated [48]. The results of our study suggest lack of statistically significant association between WFS1 gene polymorphism and GDM in the Polish population.
The results of our study suggest a lack of statistically significant associations between the studied gene polymorphisms and GDM. We have only shown the association between the PPARG gene rs1801282 polymorphism and BMI values in women with GDM. Studies suggest that some polymorphisms of genes associated with the risk of type 2 diabetes have an impact on the occurrence of GDM. However, this depends on the population studied and the possible association between these polymorphisms and other genes affecting carbohydrate metabolism and predisposition to GDM. Additionally, important is the influence of many environmental factors such as obesity, as well as the diet of pregnant women. The study results suggest that the influence of genetic polymorphisms on the risk of GDM is small. Therefore, the effect of gene polymorphisms on the risk of GDM should be considered together with other environmental factors that increase the risk of developing this disease. It is not excluded that the polymorphisms studied have a very small effect on the risk of GDM, but it would be detectable if a very large number of cases were studied. The lack of an effect of the polymorphisms studied on GDM risk and clinical parameters also does not exclude the role of the genes investigated in the pathogenesis of GDM. Understanding the role of PPARG, TMEM163, UBE2E2, and WFS1 genes in the pathogenesis of GDM requires further studies.
5. Conclusions
The results of this study suggest that PPARG (rs1801282), TMEM163 (rs6723108 and rs998451), UBE2E2 (rs6780569), and WFS1 (rs4689388) gene polymorphisms are not significant risk factors for GDM development in the Polish population and do not affect the clinical parameters in women with GDM, only rs1801282 of PPARG gene may influence BMI values in women with GDM.
Author Contributions
P.U., investigation; D.M., investigation; K.S., software; V.D., formal analysis, manuscript preparation; M.T., formal analysis; A.P., conceptualization and manuscript preparation. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
The project is financed from the program of the Minister of Science and Higher Education under the name “Regional Initiative of Excellence” in 2019–2022 project number 002/RID/2018-19.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland (KB-0012/40/14).
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.
Abbreviations
| 95% CI | 95% confidence interval |
| BMI | Body mass index |
| GDM | Gestational diabetes mellitus |
| HWE | Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium |
| IADPSG | International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups |
| IQR | Interquartile range |
| OGTT | Oral glucose tolerance test |
| OR | Odds ratio |
| PPARG | Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors-γ |
| T2DM | Type 2 diabetes |
| TMEM163 | Transmembrane Protein 163 |
| UBE2E2 | Ubiquitin Conjugating Enzyme E2 E2 |
| WFS1 | Wolframin ER Transmembrane Glycoprotein |
References
- Kim, C. Gestational diabetes: Risks, management, and treatment options. Int. J. Womens Health 2010, 2, 339–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Johns, E.C.; Denison, F.C.; Norman, J.E.; Reynolds, R.M. Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Mechanisms, Treatment, and Complications. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2018, 29, 743–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Plows, J.F.; Stanley, J.L.; Baker, P.N.; Reynolds, C.M.; Vickers, M.H. The Pathophysiology of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Barbour, L.A.; McCurdy, C.E.; Hernandez, T.L.; Kirwan, J.P.; Catalano, P.M.; Friedman, J.E. Cellular mechanisms for insulin resistance in normal pregnancy and gestational diabetes. Diabetes Care 2007, 30 (Suppl. 2), S112–S119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Dias, S.; Pheiffer, C.; Abrahams, Y.; Rheeder, P.; Adam, S. Molecular Biomarkers for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Haythorne, E.; Rohm, M.; van de Bunt, M.; Brereton, M.F.; Tarasov, A.I.; Blacker, T.S.; Sachse, G.; Silva Dos Santos, M.; Terron Exposito, R.; Davis, S.; et al. Diabetes causes marked inhibition of mitochondrial metabolism in pancreatic β-cells. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 2474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kawai, V.K.; Levinson, R.T.; Adefurin, A.; Kurnik, D.; Collier, S.P.; Conway, D.; Stein, C.M. A genetic risk score that includes common type 2 diabetes risk variants is associated with gestational diabetes. Clin. Endocrinol. 2017, 87, 149–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kanthimathi, S.; Chidambaram, M.; Bodhini, D.; Liju, S.; Bhavatharini, A.; Uma, R.; Anjana, R.M.; Mohan, V.; Radha, V. Association of recently identified type 2 diabetes gene variants with Gestational Diabetes in Asian Indian population. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2017, 292, 585–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Magri, C.J.; Gatt, N.; Xuereb, R.G.; Fava, S. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ and the endothelium: Implications in cardiovascular disease. Expert Rev. Cardiovasc. Ther. 2011, 9, 1279–1294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarhangi, N.; Sharifi, F.; Hashemian, L.; Hassani Doabsari, M.; Heshmatzad, K.; Rahbaran, M.; Jamaldini, S.H.; Aghaei Meybodi, H.; Hasanzad, M. PPARG (Pro12Ala) genetic variant and risk of T2DM: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 12764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gacka, M.; Bednarska-Chabowska, D.; Dobosz, T.; Szymaniec, S.; Jakobsche, U.; Lebioda, A.; Adamiec, R. The Pro12Ala polymorphism of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma and immunological processes in patients with type 2 diabetes and insulin resistance. Przegl. Lek. 2007, 64, 393–397. [Google Scholar]
- Motavallian, A.; Andalib, S.; Vaseghi, G.; Mirmohammad-Sadeghi, H.; Amini, M. Association between PRO12ALA polymorphism of the PPAR-γ2 gene and type 2 diabetes mellitus in Iranian patients. Indian J. Hum. Genet. 2013, 19, 239–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Chakraborty, S.; Vellarikkal, S.K.; Sivasubbu, S.; Roy, S.S.; Tandon, N.; Bharadwaj, D. Role of Tmem163 in zinc-regulated insulin storage of MIN6 cells: Functional exploration of an Indian type 2 diabetes GWAS associated gene. Biochem. Biophs. Res. Commun. 2020, 522, 1022–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Styrpejko, D.; Cuajungco, M.P. Transmembrane 163 (TMEM163) Protein: A New Member of the Zinc Efflux Transporter Family. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kazakova, E.V.; Wu, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Chen, M.; Wang, T.; Tong, H.; Zhuang, T.; Sun, L.; Qiao, H. Association between UBE2E2 variant rs7612463 and type 2 diabetes mellitus in a Chinese Han population. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2015, 62, 241–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Xu, K.; Jiang, L.; Zhang, M.; Zheng, X.; Gu, Y.; Wang, Z.; Cai, Y.; Dai, H.; Shi, Y.; Zheng, S.; et al. Type 2 Diabetes Risk Allele UBE2E2 Is Associated with Decreased Glucose-Stimulated Insulin Release in Elderly Chinese Han Individuals. Medicine 2016, 95, e3604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, S.; Wu, Y.; Wu, W.; Zhang, D. Association of rs734312 and rs10010131 polymorphisms in WFS1 gene with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis. Endocr. J. 2013, 60, 441–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Bansal, V.; Boehm, B.O.; Darvasi, A. Identification of a missense variant in the WFS1 gene that causes a mild form of Wolfram syndrome and is associated with risk for type 2 diabetes in Ashkenazi Jewish individuals. Diabetologia 2018, 61, 2180–2188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Consensus Panel. International association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Care 2010, 33, 676–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Wang, F.; Mullican, S.E.; DiSpirito, J.R.; Peed, L.C.; Lazar, M.A. Lipoatrophy and severe metabolic disturbance in mice with fat-specific deletion of PPAR γ. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 18656–18661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Park, K.W.; Halperin, D.S.; Tontonoz, P. Before they were fat: Adipocyte progenitors. Cell Metab. 2008, 8, 454–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Almeida, S.M.; Furtado, J.M.; Mascarenhas, P.; Ferraz, M.E.; Ferreira, J.C.; Monteiro, M.P.; Vilanova, M.; Ferraz, F.P. Association between LEPR, FTO, MC4R, and PPARG-2 polymorphisms with obesity traits and metabolic phenotypes in school-aged children. Endocrine 2018, 60, 466–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Hevener, A.L.; Olefsky, J.M.; Reichart, D.; Nguyen, M.T.; Bandyopadyhay, G.; Leung, H.Y.; Watt, M.J.; Benner, C.; Febbraio, M.A.; Nguyen, A.K.; et al. Macrophage PPAR gamma is required for normal skeletal muscle and hepatic insulin sensitivity and full antidiabetic effects of thiazolidinediones. J. Clin. Investig. 2007, 117, 1658–1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Landgraf, K.; Klöting, N.; Gericke, M.; Maixner, N.; Guiu-Jurado, E.; Scholz, M.; Witte, A.V.; Beyer, F.; Schwartze, J.T.; Lacher, M.; et al. The Obesity-Susceptibility Gene TMEM18 Promotes Adipogenesis through Activation of PPARG. Cell Rep. 2020, 33, 108295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lendvai, Á.; Deutsch, M.J.; Plösch, T.; Ensenauer, R. The peroxisome proliferator- activated receptors under epigenetic control in placental metabolism and fetal development. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2016, 310, E797–E810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wójcik, M.; Mac-Marcjanek, K.; Nadel, I.; Woźniak, L.; Cypryk, K. Gestational diabetes mellitus is associated with increased leukocyte peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ expression. Arch. Med. Sci. 2015, 11, 779–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wu, L.; Cui, L.; Tam, W.H.; Ma, R.C.; Wang, C.C. Genetic variants associated with gestational diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis and subgroup analysis. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 30539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anghebem-Oliveira, M.I.; Martins, B.R.; Alberton, D.; Ramos, E.A.S.; Picheth, G.; Rego, F.G.M. Type 2 diabetes-associated genetic variants of FTO, LEPR, PPARg, and TCF7L2 in gestational diabetes in a Brazilian population. Arch. Endocrinol. Metab. 2017, 61, 238–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wang, C.; Li, X.; Huang, Z.; Qian, J. Quantitative assessment of the influence of PPARG P12A polymorphism on gestational diabetes mellitus risk. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2013, 40, 811–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mao, H.; Li, Q.; Gao, S. Meta-analysis of the relationship between common type 2 diabetes risk gene variants with gestational diabetes mellitus. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e45882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tabassum, R.; Chauhan, G.; Dwivedi, O.P.; Mahajan, A.; Jaiswal, A.; Kaur, I.; Bandesh, K.; Singh, T.; Mathai, B.J.; Pandey, Y.; et al. Genome-wide association study for type 2 diabetes in Indians identifies a new susceptibility locus at 2q21. Diabetes 2013, 62, 977–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Sharma, V.; Sharma, I.; Sethi, I.; Mahajan, A.; Singh, G.; Angural, A.; Bhanwer, A.J.S.; Dhar, M.K.; Singh, V.; Rai, E.; et al. Replication of newly identified type 2 diabetes susceptible loci in Northwest Indian population. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2017, 126, 160–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, H.; Liu, H.; Suyalatu, S.; Guo, X.; Chu, S.; Chen, Y.; Lan, T.; Borjigin, B.; Orlov, Y.L.; Posukh, O.L.; et al. Association Analysis of Genetic Variants with Type 2 Diabetes in a Mongolian Population in China. J. Diabetes Res. 2015, 2015, 613236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Tan, Y.X.; Hu, S.M.; You, Y.P.; Yang, G.L.; Wang, W. Replication of previous genome-wide association studies of HKDC1, BACE2, SLC16A11 and TMEM163 SNPs in a gestational diabetes mellitus case-control sample from Han Chinese population. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Obes. 2019, 12, 983–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Zeng, Y.; He, H.; Zhang, L.; Zhu, W.; Shen, H.; Yan, Y.J.; Deng, H.W. GWAS-based pleiotropic analysis identified potential SNPs and genes related to type 2 diabetes and obesity. J. Hum. Genet. 2021, 66, 297–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alharbi, K.K.; Khan, I.A.; Al-Sheikh, Y.A.; Alharbi, F.K.; Alharbi, F.K.; Al-Nbaheen, M.S. Lack of association between UBE2E2 gene polymorphism (rs7612463) and type 2 diabetes mellitus in a Saudi population. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2014, 61, 769–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Plengvidhya, N.; Chanprasert, C.; Chongjaroen, N.; Yenchitsomanus, P.T.; Homsanit, M.; Tangjittipokin, W. Impact of KCNQ1, CDKN2A/2B, CDKAL1, HHEX, MTNR1B, SLC30A8, TCF7L2, and UBE2E2 on risk of developing type 2 diabetes in Thai population. BMC Med. Genet. 2018, 19, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goto, A.; Noda, M.; Goto, M.; Yasuda, K.; Mizoue, T.; Yamaji, T.; Sawada, N.; Iwasaki, M.; Inoue, M.; Tsugane, S.; et al. Predictive performance of a genetic risk score using 11 susceptibility alleles for the incidence of Type 2 diabetes in a general Japanese population: A nested case-control study. Diabet. Med. 2018, 35, 602–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.Y.; Cheong, H.S.; Park, B.L.; Baik, S.H.; Park, S.; Kim, S.; Shin, H.D.; Kim, S.H. Putative association between UBE2E2 polymorphisms and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 2013, 29, 904–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ryu, J.; Lee, C. Differential promoter activity by nucleotide substitution at a type 2 diabetes genome-wide association study signal upstream of the wolframin gene. J. Diabetes 2016, 8, 253–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fawcett, K.A.; Wheeler, E.; Morris, A.P.; Ricketts, S.L.; Hallmans, G.; Rolandsson, O.; Daly, A.; Wasson, J.; Permutt, A.; Hattersley, A.T.; et al. Detailed investigation of the role of common and low- frequency WFS1 variants in type 2 diabetes risk. Diabetes 2010, 59, 741–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sandhu, M.S.; Weedon, M.N.; Fawcett, K.A.; Wasson, J.; Debenham, S.L.; Daly, A.; Lango, H.; Frayling, T.M.; Neumann, R.J.; Sherva, R.; et al. Common variants in WFS1 confer risk of type 2 diabetes. Nat. Genet. 2007, 39, 951–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Neuman, R.J.; Wasson, J.; Atzmon, G.; Wainstein, J.; Yerushalmi, Y.; Cohen, J.; Barzilai, N.; Blech, I.; Glaser, B.; Permutt, M.A. Gene-gene interactions lead to higher risk for development of type 2 diabetes in an Ashkenazi Jewish population. PLoS ONE. 2010, 5, e9903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Cheurfa, N.; Brenner, G.M.; Reis, A.F.; Dubois-Laforgue, D.; Roussel, R.; Tichet, J.; Lantieri, O.; Balkau, B.; Fumeron, F.; Timsit, J.; et al. Decreased insulin secretion and increased risk of type 2 diabetes associated with allelic variations of the WFS1 gene: The Data from Epidemiological Study on the Insulin Resistance Syndrome (DESIR) prospective study. Diabetologia 2011, 54, 554–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Chavali, S.; Mahajan, A.; Tabassum, R.; Dwivedi, O.P.; Chauhan, G.; Ghosh, S.; Tandon, N.; Bharadwaj, D. Association of variants in genes involved in pancreatic β-cell development and function with type 2 diabetes in North Indians. J. Hum. Genet. 2011, 56, 695–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Franks, P.W.; Rolandsson, O.; Debenham, S.L.; Fawcett, K.A.; Payne, F.; Dina, C.; Froguel, P.; Mohlke, K.L.; Willer, C.; Olsson, T.; et al. Replication of the association between variants in WFS1 and risk of type 2 diabetes in European populations. Diabetologia 2008, 51, 458–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Long, J.; Edwards, T.; Signorello, L.B.; Cai, Q.; Zheng, W.; Shu, X.O.; Blot, W.J. Evaluation of genome-wide association study-identified type 2 diabetes loci in African Americans. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2012, 176, 995–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lauenborg, J.; Grarup, N.; Damm, P.; Borch-Johnsen, K.; Jørgensen, T.; Pedersen, O.; Hansen, T. Common type 2 diabetes risk gene variants associate with gestational diabetes. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2009, 94, 145–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Table 1.
Distribution of PPARG, TMEM163, UBE2E2, and WFS1 genotypes and alleles in women with GDM and control group.
Table 1.
Distribution of PPARG, TMEM163, UBE2E2, and WFS1 genotypes and alleles in women with GDM and control group.
| Control Group | GDM | p Value^ | OR (95% CI) | p Value ^ | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | % | n | % | |||||
| PPARG rs17036160 genotype | ||||||||
| CC | 159 | 76.81% | 156 | 76.47% | 0.94 | TT + CT vs. CC | 1.02 (0.65–1.61) | 0.93 |
| CT | 43 | 20.77% | 44 | 21.57% | TT vs. CT + CC | 0.81 (0.21–3.05) | 0.75 | |
| TT | 5 | 2.42% | 4 | 1.96% | TT vs. CC | 0.82 (0.21–3.09) | 0.76 | |
| CT vs. CC | 1.04 (0.65–1.68) | 0.86 | ||||||
| TT vs. CT | 0.78 (0.20–3.11) | 0.73 | ||||||
| Allele | ||||||||
| C | 361 | 87.20% | 356 | 87.25% | T vs. C | 0.99 (0.66–1.50) | 0.98 | |
| T | 53 | 12.80% | 52 | 12.75% | ||||
| TMEM163 rs6723108 genotype | ||||||||
| TT | 92 | 44.44% | 98 | 48.04% | 0.76 | GG + GT vs. TT | 0.87 (0.59–1.28) | 0.46 |
| GT | 93 | 44.93% | 86 | 42.16% | GG vs. GT + TT | 0.91 (0.48–1.73) | 0.78 | |
| GG | 22 | 10.63% | 20 | 9.80% | GG vs. TT | 0.85 (0.44–1.67) | 0.64 | |
| GT vs. TT | 0.87 (0.58–1.31) | 0.50 | ||||||
| GG vs. GT | 0.98 (0.50–1.93) | 0.96 | ||||||
| Allele | ||||||||
| T | 277 | 66.91% | 282 | 69.12% | G vs. T | 0.90 (0.67–1.21) | 0.50 | |
| G | 137 | 33.09% | 126 | 30.88% | ||||
| TMEM163 rs998451 genotype | ||||||||
| GG | 94 | 45.41% | 103 | 50.49% | 0.59 | AA + GA vs. GG | 0.82 (0.55–1.20) | 0.30 |
| GA | 91 | 43.96% | 81 | 39.71% | AA vs. GA + GG | 0.91 (0.48–1.73) | 0.78 | |
| AA | 22 | 10.63% | 20 | 9.80% | AA vs. GG | 0.83 (0.43–1.62) | 0.58 | |
| GA vs. GG | 0.81 (0.54–1.22) | 0.32 | ||||||
| AA vs. GA | 1.02 (0.52–2.01) | 0.95 | ||||||
| Allele | ||||||||
| G | 279 | 67.39% | 287 | 70.34% | A vs. G | 0.87 (0.65–1.17) | 0.36 | |
| A | 135 | 32.61% | 121 | 29.66% | ||||
| UBE2E2 rs6780569 genotype | ||||||||
| GG | 180 | 86.96% | 176 | 86.27% | 0.89 | AA + GA vs. GG | 1.06 (0.60–1.87) | 0.84 |
| GA | 25 | 12.08% | 25 | 12.25% | AA vs. GA + GG | 1.53 (0.25–9.25) | 0.64 | |
| AA | 2 | 0.97% | 3 | 1.47% | AA vs. GG | 1.53 (0.25–9.29) | 0.64 | |
| GA vs. GG | 1.02 (0.57–1.85) | 0.94 | ||||||
| AA vs. GA | 1.50 (0.23–9.76) | 0.67 | ||||||
| Allele | ||||||||
| G | 385 | 93.00% | 377 | 92.40% | A vs. G | 1.09 (0.65–1.85) | 0.74 | |
| A | 29 | 7.00% | 31 | 7.60% | ||||
| WFS1 rs4689388genotype | ||||||||
| AA | 52 | 25.12% | 64 | 31.37% | 0.24 | GG + GA vs. AA | 0.73 (0.48–1.13) | 0.16 |
| GA | 114 | 55.07% | 96 | 47.06% | GG vs. GA + AA | 1.11 (0.69–1.80) | 0.66 | |
| GG | 41 | 19.81% | 44 | 21.57% | GG vs. AA | 0.87 (0.50–1.53) | 0.63 | |
| GA vs. AA | 0.68 (0.69–1.20) | 0.10 | ||||||
| GG vs. GA | 1.27 (0.43–1.08) | 0.35 | ||||||
| Allele | ||||||||
| A | 218 | 52.66% | 224 | 54.90% | G vs. A | 0.91 (0.77–2.11) | 0.52 | |
| G | 196 | 47.34% | 184 | 45.10% | ||||
^ χ2 test. HWE: control group p = 0.34, GDM group p = 0.75 for PPARG rs17036160. HWE: control group p= 0.88, GDM group p = 0.87 for TMEM163 rs6723108. HWE: control group p = 1.00, GDM group p = 0.50 for TMEM163 rs998451. HWE: control group p = 0.26, GDM group p = 0.09 for UBE2E2 rs6780569. HWE: control group p= 0.16, GDM group p = 0.48 for WFS1 rs4689388.
Table 2.
Clinical parameters of women with GDM stratified according to PPARG rs17036160 genotype.
| Parameters | PPARG rs17036160 Genotype | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CC n = 154 | CT n = 44 | TT n = 4 | CC vs. CT | CC vs. TT | CT vs. TT | |
| Median (IQR) | Median (IQR) | Median (IQR) | p& | |||
| Fasting glucose [mg/dl] | 98.3 (93.0–105.0) | 99.0 (94.0–105.0) | 97.5 (91.5–98.5) | 0.97 | 0.34 | 0.32 |
| Daily insulin requirement [unit] | 0.0 (0.0–6.5) | 0.0 (0.0–0.0) | 0.0 (0.0–0.0) | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.39 |
| Body mass before pregnancy [kg] | 65.0 (56.5–76.0) | 65.0 (58.5–73.5) | 55.5 (53.0–58.5) | 0.85 | 0.05 | 0.044 |
| Body mass at birth [kg] | 77.0 (67.0–90.0) | 76.0 (68.0–84.0) | 65.5 (61.5–67.0) | 0.93 | 0.024 | 0.012 |
| Body mass increase during pregnancy [kg] | 11.0 (7.0–14.0) | 11.0 (8.0–13.5) | 7.0 (7.0–10.0) | 0.93 | 0.30 | 0.20 |
| BMI before pregnancy [kg/m2] | 24.2 (21.0–28.5) | 22.8 (21.4–26.3) | 20.3 (18.8–21.6) | 0.26 | 0.021 | 0.032 |
| BMI at birth [kg/m2] | 28.4 (25.2–33.0) | 26.7 (25.-30.1) | 23.9 (22.0–24.6) | 0.21 | 0.010 | 0.011 |
| BMI increase during pregnancy [kg/m2] | 3.8 (2.7–5.2) | 3.6 (2.8–5.0) | 2.6 (2.5–3.7) | 0.76 | 0.25 | 0.16 |
| Newborn body mass [g] | 3365 (2985–3685) | 3205 (2750–3553) | 3305 (3205–3425) | 0.17 | 0.88 | 0.63 |
| APGAR [0–10] | 10.0 (10.0–10.0) | 10.0 (10.0–10.0) | 10.0 (10.0–10.0) | 0.95 | 0.46 | 0.48 |
BMI—body mass index. IQR—Interquartile Range. & Mann–Whitney U test.
Table 3.
Clinical parameters of women with GDM stratified according to TMEM163 rs6723108 genotype.
| Parameters | TMEM163 rs6723108 Genotype | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TT n = 98 | GT n = 86 | GG n = 20 | TT vs. GT | TT vs. GG | GT vs. GG | |
| Median (IQR) | Median (IQR) | Median (IQR) | p& | |||
| Fasting glucose [mg/dl] | 98.0 (94.0–105.0) | 98.5 (92.0–105.0) | 102.5 (96.0–106.5) | 0.86 | 0.27 | 0.25 |
| Daily insulin requirement [unit] | 0.0 (0.0–0.0) | 0.0 (0.0–0.0) | 0.0 (0.0–15.0) | 0.92 | 0.079 | 0.093 |
| Body mass before pregnancy [kg] | 65.0 (56.0–76.0) | 64.0 (57.0–73.0) | 68.5 (59.0–90.0) | 0.85 | 0.17 | 0.17 |
| Body mass at birth [kg] | 76.0 (67.0–90.0) | 75.0 (68.0–87.0) | 80.0 (70.0–97.5) | 0.85 | 0.15 | 0.17 |
| Body mass increase during pregnancy [kg] | 11.0 (7.0–14.0) | 11.0 (8.0–14.0) | 9.5 (7.0–14.0) | 0.93 | 0.47 | 0.48 |
| BMI before pregnancy [kg/m2] | 23.7 (20.7–28.3) | 23.1 (21.1–26.4) | 24.6 (21.4–31.0) | 0.61 | 0.29 | 0.22 |
| BMI at birth [kg/m2] | 28.1 (25.0–32.6) | 27.6 (25.0–31.1) | 28.2 (25.4–35.6) | 0.58 | 0.32 | 0.22 |
| BMI increase during pregnancy [kg/m2] | 3.9 (2.7–5.3) | 3.7 (2.7–5.1) | 3.4 (2.5–4.9) | 0.71 | 0.38 | 0.42 |
| Newborn body mass [g] | 3280 (2900–3600) | 3345 (2970–3700) | 3408 (3165–3683) | 0.58 | 0.32 | 0.62 |
| APGAR [0–10] | 10.0 (10.0–10.0) | 10.0 (10.0–10.0) | 10.0 (10.0–10.0) | 0.87 | 0.086 | 0.093 |
BMI—body mass index. IQR—Interquartile Range. & Mann–Whitney U test.
Table 4.
Clinical parameters of women with GDM stratified according to TMEM163 rs998451 genotype.
| Parameters | TMEM163 rs998451 Genotype | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GG n = 103 | GA n = 81 | AA n = 20 | GG vs. GA | GG vs. AA | GA vs. AA | |
| Median (IQR) | Median (IQR) | Median (IQR) | p& | |||
| Fasting glucose [mg/dl] | 98.5 (94.0–106.0) | 98.0 (92.0–104.0) | 102.5 (96.0–106.5) | 0.39 | 0.37 | 0.17 |
| Daily insulin requirement [unit] | 0.0 (0.0–4.0) | 0.0 (0.0–0.0) | 0.0 (0.0–15.0) | 0.60 | 0.11 | 0.060 |
| Body mass before pregnancy [kg] | 65.0 (56.0–76.0) | 64.0 (57.0–72.0) | 68.5 (59.0–90.0) | 0.91 | 0.17 | 0.17 |
| Body mass at birth [kg] | 76.0 (67.0–90.0) | 75.0 (67.0–85.0) | 80.0 (70.0–97.5) | 0.99 | 0.16 | 0.16 |
| Body mass increase during pregnancy [kg] | 11.0 (7.0–14.0) | 11.0 (8.0–13.0) | 9.5 (7.0–14.0) | 0.97 | 0.48 | 0.47 |
| BMI before pregnancy [kg/m2] | 23.7 (20.7–28.3) | 23.2 (21.1–26.2) | 24.6 (21.4–31.0) | 0.57 | 0.29 | 0.22 |
| BMI at birth [kg/m2] | 28.3 (25.0–32.6) | 27.6 (25.0–30.8) | 28.2 (25.4–35.6) | 0.47 | 0.34 | 0.20 |
| BMI increase during pregnancy [kg/m2] | 3.8 (2.7–5.3) | 3.8 (2.8–5.0) | 3.4 (2.5–4.9) | 0.77 | 0.40 | 0.40 |
| Newborn body mass [g] | 3290 (2900–3600) | 3340 (2970–3680) | 3408 (3165–3683) | 0.68 | 0.34 | 0.60 |
| APGAR [0–10] | 10.0 (10.0–10.0) | 10.0 (10.0–10.0) | 10.0 (10.0–10.0) | 0.78 | 0.082 | 0.10 |
BMI—body mass index. IQR—Interquartile Range. & Mann–Whitney U test.
Table 5.
Clinical parameters of women with GDM stratified according to UBE2E2 rs6780569 genotype.
| Parameters | UBE2E2 rs6780569 Genotype | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GG n = 176 | GA n = 25 | AA n = 3 | GG vs. GA | GG vs. AA | GA vs. AA | |
| Median (IQR) | Median (IQR) | Median | p& | |||
| Fasting glucose [mg/dl] | 99.0 (94.0–105.0) | 97.0 (93.0–103.0) | 94.0 | 0.55 | 0.91 | 0.91 |
| Daily insulin requirement [unit] | 0.0 (0.0–4.0) | 0.0 (0.0–0.0) | 0.0 | 0.22 | 0.98 | 0.62 |
| Body mass before pregnancy [kg] | 65.0 (56.5–76.0) | 67.0 (59.0–70.0) | 62.0 | 0.65 | 0.44 | 0.28 |
| Body mass at birth [kg] | 76.0 (67.0–89.0) | 76.0 (67.0–89.0) | 70.0 | 0.68 | 0.21 | 0.13 |
| Body mass increase during pregnancy [kg] | 10.5 (7.0–14.0) | 12.0 (8.0–14.0) | 7.0 | 0.44 | 0.17 | 0.12 |
| BMI before pregnancy [kg/m2] | 23.5 (20.9–27.9) | 24.7 (21.0–28.4) | 22.7 | 0.59 | 0.65 | 0.53 |
| BMI at birth [kg/m2] | 27.7 (25.0–31.8) | 29.1 (25.4–33.6) | 25.2 | 0.63 | 0.29 | 0.22 |
| BMI increase during pregnancy [kg/m2] | 3.7 (2.7–5.2) | 4.2 (2.7–5.3) | 3.1 | 0.50 | 0.21 | 0.17 |
| Newborn body mass [g] | 3333 (2910–3690) | 3360 (3180–3530) | 3100 | 0.72 | 0.45 | 0.19 |
| APGAR [0–10] | 10.0 (10.0–10.0) | 10.0 (10.0–10.0) | 10.0 | 0.17 | 0.50 | 0.73 |
BMI—body mass index. IQR—Interquartile Range. & Mann–Whitney U test.
Table 6.
Clinical parameters of women with GDM stratified according to WFS1 rs4689388 genotype.
| Parameters | WFS1 rs4689388 Genotype | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA n = 64 | GA n = 96 | GG n = 44 | AA vs. GA | AA vs. GG | GA vs. GG | |
| Median (IQR) | Median (IQR) | Median (IQR) | p& | |||
| Fasting glucose [mg/dl] | 97.0 (92.5–104.5) | 99.0 (96.0–105.5) | 99.0 (93.0–105.5) | 0.20 | 0.49 | 0.74 |
| Daily insulin requirement [unit] | 0.0 (0.0–0.0) | 0.0 (0.0–7.5) | 0.0 (0.0–0.0) | 0.36 | 0.88 | 0.42 |
| Body mass before pregnancy [kg] | 65.5 (57.0–72.0) | 64.5 (56.0–77.5) | 65.5 (58.0–76.0) | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.92 |
| Body mass at birth [kg] | 78.5 (68.0–87.5) | 75.5 (67.0–89.5) | 75.5 (68.0–88.5) | 0.73 | 0.98 | 0.75 |
| Body mass increase during pregnancy [kg] | 11.0 (8.0–14.0) | 10.0 (7.0–13.0) | 10.0 (7.0–14.5) | 0.14 | 0.42 | 0.78 |
| BMI before pregnancy [kg/m2] | 23.8 (21.3–26.8) | 23.1 (20.6–28.4) | 24.7 (22.1–28.3) | 0.76 | 0.31 | 0.26 |
| BMI at birth [kg/m2] | 27.8 (25.4–32.1) | 26.8 (24.7–32.7) | 29.3 (25.7–31.0) | 0.28 | 0.61 | 0.17 |
| BMI increase during pregnancy [kg/m2] | 4.1 (3.0–5.4) | 3.6 (2.6–4.7) | 3.7 (2.5–5.3) | 0.090 | 0.53 | 0.51 |
| Newborn body mass [g] | 3225 (2768–3665) | 3375 (3058–3665) | 3368 (2960–3625) | 0.20 | 0.36 | 0.86 |
| APGAR [0–10] | 10.0 (10.0–10.0) | 10.0 (10.0–10.0) | 10.0 (10.0–10.0) | 0.45 | 0.17 | 0.39 |
BMI—body mass index. IQR—Interquartile Range. & Mann–Whitney U test.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Ustianowski, P.; Malinowski, D.; Safranow, K.; Dziedziejko, V.; Tarnowski, M.; Pawlik, A. PPARG, TMEM163, UBE2E2, and WFS1 Gene Polymorphisms Are Not Significant Risk Factors for Gestational Diabetes in the Polish Population. J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12, 243. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12020243
AMA Style
Ustianowski P, Malinowski D, Safranow K, Dziedziejko V, Tarnowski M, Pawlik A. PPARG, TMEM163, UBE2E2, and WFS1 Gene Polymorphisms Are Not Significant Risk Factors for Gestational Diabetes in the Polish Population. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 2022; 12(2):243. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12020243
Chicago/Turabian StyleUstianowski, Przemysław, Damian Malinowski, Krzysztof Safranow, Violetta Dziedziejko, Maciej Tarnowski, and Andrzej Pawlik. 2022. "PPARG, TMEM163, UBE2E2, and WFS1 Gene Polymorphisms Are Not Significant Risk Factors for Gestational Diabetes in the Polish Population" Journal of Personalized Medicine 12, no. 2: 243. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12020243
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
