Next Article in Journal
Identifying a Critical Blind Spot: How Commercial AI (CAD) Systems Fail to Detect Faint Ground-Glass Opacities at −730 HU on Low-Dose CT
Next Article in Special Issue
Association of Preoperative Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Immature Granulocytes with Postoperative Pain After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Previous Article in Journal
Paired In-Hospital Dynamics in Hepatitis E: Rapid Transaminase Decline and Persistent Hyperbilirubinemia in a Romanian Cohort
Previous Article in Special Issue
Pressure Pain Threshold Cut-Off Points at Trigeminal and Extra-Trigeminal Nervous and Musculoskeletal Structures to Discriminate Patients with Migraine from Episodic Tension-Type Headache: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

Diagnostic Performance of Biomarkers for Perioperative Hypersensitivity Reactions in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Tryptase and Histamine Dosing

by
Cristina Petrișor
1,*,
Cătălin Constantinescu
1,*,
Robert Szabo
1,
Vlad Dăncilă
1 and
Nadia Onițiu-Gherman
2
1
Anesthesia and Intensive Care II Department, “Iuliu Hațieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
2
Immunology and Allergology Department, “Iuliu Hațieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2026, 16(7), 1013; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16071013
Submission received: 21 February 2026 / Revised: 17 March 2026 / Accepted: 23 March 2026 / Published: 27 March 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Diagnosis and Management in Anesthesia and Pain Medicine)

Abstract

Background: The clinical intra-anesthetic changes of perioperative hypersensitivity (POH) are not specific and require a thorough differential diagnosis with other mimicking conditions. Biomarkers such as tryptase and histamine provide supportive evidence for POH. From the suggested cutoffs, a common decision threshold has not been validated for use in daily practice. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to identify biomarkers investigated for POH and to evaluate their diagnostic performance. Methods: This meta-analysis included original diagnostic accuracy studies comparing patients with clinically suspected POH and controls with no signs of intraoperative hypersensitivity reactions, in whom allergy biomarkers were evaluated, aiming to investigate diagnostic performance of the assays. Data was pooled to evaluate sensitivity and specificity. Results: In seven studies on tryptase and three studies on histamine dosing for the diagnosis of POH/POA, different fixed or dynamic thresholds for positivity were proposed. For tryptase, fixed thresholds had 59.8% sensitivity and 95.2% specificity for an optimal cutoff of 12.68 ng/mL, while dynamic thresholds yielded 77.2% sensitivity and 88.5% specificity. For histamine, fixed cutoffs presented 78% sensitivity and 85% specificity, while dynamic thresholds investigated in a single study yielded 78.2% sensitivity and 91.1% specificity. Estimates for histamine are unreliable due to limited data. Conclusions: From published data, tryptase is clearly the most robust biomarker, dynamic thresholds boost sensitivity without major specificity loss and confirm the added diagnostic value of relative changes over fixed absolute cutoffs. Preliminary results suggest that histamine might have optimal diagnostic performance, but estimates are severely limited by small sample sizes.
Keywords: perioperative hypersensitivity; perioperative anaphylaxis; sensitivity; specificity; diagnostic performance; diagnostic accuracy; tryptase; histamine perioperative hypersensitivity; perioperative anaphylaxis; sensitivity; specificity; diagnostic performance; diagnostic accuracy; tryptase; histamine

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Petrișor, C.; Constantinescu, C.; Szabo, R.; Dăncilă, V.; Onițiu-Gherman, N. Diagnostic Performance of Biomarkers for Perioperative Hypersensitivity Reactions in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Tryptase and Histamine Dosing. Diagnostics 2026, 16, 1013. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16071013

AMA Style

Petrișor C, Constantinescu C, Szabo R, Dăncilă V, Onițiu-Gherman N. Diagnostic Performance of Biomarkers for Perioperative Hypersensitivity Reactions in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Tryptase and Histamine Dosing. Diagnostics. 2026; 16(7):1013. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16071013

Chicago/Turabian Style

Petrișor, Cristina, Cătălin Constantinescu, Robert Szabo, Vlad Dăncilă, and Nadia Onițiu-Gherman. 2026. "Diagnostic Performance of Biomarkers for Perioperative Hypersensitivity Reactions in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Tryptase and Histamine Dosing" Diagnostics 16, no. 7: 1013. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16071013

APA Style

Petrișor, C., Constantinescu, C., Szabo, R., Dăncilă, V., & Onițiu-Gherman, N. (2026). Diagnostic Performance of Biomarkers for Perioperative Hypersensitivity Reactions in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Tryptase and Histamine Dosing. Diagnostics, 16(7), 1013. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16071013

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop