Next Article in Journal
Utility of the BioFire® FilmArray® Pneumonia Panel Using Bronchial Washing Specimens: A Comparative Study with Conventional Culture
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of CD3 and CD20 Lymphocytes and Mast Cells in the Microenvironment of Central Giant Cell Granuloma, Peripheral Giant Cell Granuloma, and Giant Cell Tumor of Bone
Previous Article in Special Issue
Clinical TNM Lung Cancer Staging: A Diagnostic Algorithm with a Pictorial Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

An Adaptive Hybrid Metaheuristic Algorithm for Lung Cancer in Pathological Image Segmentation

by
Muhammed Faruk Şahin
1,2,* and
Ferzat Anka
2
1
Department of Computer Engineering, Istanbul Atlas University, 34408 Istanbul, Türkiye
2
Data Science Application and Research Center (VEBIM), Fatih Sultan Mehmet Vakif University, 34445 Istanbul, Türkiye
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2026, 16(1), 84; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16010084
Submission received: 28 August 2025 / Revised: 20 September 2025 / Accepted: 8 October 2025 / Published: 26 December 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Lung Cancer Diagnosis)

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Histopathological images are fundamental for the morphological diagnosis and subtyping of lung cancer. However, their high resolution, color diversity, and structural complexity make automated segmentation highly challenging. This study aims to address these challenges by developing a novel hybrid metaheuristic approach for multilevel image thresholding to enhance segmentation accuracy and computational efficiency. Methods: An adaptive hybrid metaheuristic algorithm, termed SCSOWOA, is proposed by integrating the Sand Cat Swarm Optimization (SCSO) algorithm with the Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA). The algorithm combines the exploration capacity of SCSO with the exploitation strength of WOA in a sequential and adaptive manner. The model was evaluated on histopathological images of lung cancer from the LC25000 dataset with threshold levels ranging from 2 to 12, using PSNR, SSIM, and FSIM as performance metrics. Results: The proposed algorithm achieved stable and high-quality segmentation results, with average values of 27.9453 dB in PSNR, 0.8048 in SSIM, and 0.8361 in FSIM. At the threshold level of T = 12, SCSOWOA obtained the highest performance, with SSIM and FSIM scores of 0.9340 and 0.9542, respectively. Furthermore, it demonstrated the lowest average execution time of 1.3221 s, offering up to a 40% improvement in computational efficiency compared with other metaheuristic methods. Conclusions: The SCSOWOA algorithm effectively balances exploration and exploitation processes, providing high-accuracy, low-variance, and computationally efficient segmentation. These findings highlight its potential as a robust and practical solution for AI-assisted histopathological image analysis and lung cancer diagnosis systems.
Keywords: hybrid metaheuristics; image processing; deep learning; lung cancer; medical image segmentation hybrid metaheuristics; image processing; deep learning; lung cancer; medical image segmentation
Graphical Abstract

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Şahin, M.F.; Anka, F. An Adaptive Hybrid Metaheuristic Algorithm for Lung Cancer in Pathological Image Segmentation. Diagnostics 2026, 16, 84. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16010084

AMA Style

Şahin MF, Anka F. An Adaptive Hybrid Metaheuristic Algorithm for Lung Cancer in Pathological Image Segmentation. Diagnostics. 2026; 16(1):84. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16010084

Chicago/Turabian Style

Şahin, Muhammed Faruk, and Ferzat Anka. 2026. "An Adaptive Hybrid Metaheuristic Algorithm for Lung Cancer in Pathological Image Segmentation" Diagnostics 16, no. 1: 84. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16010084

APA Style

Şahin, M. F., & Anka, F. (2026). An Adaptive Hybrid Metaheuristic Algorithm for Lung Cancer in Pathological Image Segmentation. Diagnostics, 16(1), 84. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16010084

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop