Next Article in Journal
Agreement Analysis Among Hip and Knee Periprosthetic Joint Infections Classifications
Next Article in Special Issue
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Ocular and Periocular Basal Cell Carcinoma with First-Time Description of Dermoscopic and Reflectance Confocal Microscopy Features of Caruncle Basal Cell Carcinoma
Previous Article in Journal
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Related Sjögren’s Syndrome: An Ocular Immune-Related Adverse Event
Previous Article in Special Issue
Enhancing Diagnosis in Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Non-Invasive Imaging and Multimodal Approach
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Diagnostics
Volume 15
Issue 9
10.3390/diagnostics15091171
diagnostics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

TERT Immunohistochemistry in Thin Melanomas Compared to Melanocytic Nevi

by
Iulia Zboraș
1,
Loredana Ungureanu
1,*,
Simona Corina Șenilă
1,
Bobe Petrushev
2,
Paula Zamfir
2,
Doinița Crișan
3,
Flaviu Andrei Zaharie
4,
Ștefan Cristian Vesa
5 and
Rodica Cosgarea
1
1
Department of Dermatology, “Iuliu Hațieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
2
Department of Pathology, Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
3
Department of Pathology, “Iuliu Hațieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
4
Faculty of Medicine, “Iuliu Hațieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
5
Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Clinical Pharmacology, “Iuliu Hațieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400337 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2025, 15(9), 1171; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15091171
Submission received: 18 March 2025 / Revised: 26 April 2025 / Accepted: 3 May 2025 / Published: 4 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Developments in the Diagnosis of Skin Tumors)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background/Objectives: Telomerase plays a vital role in preserving telomere length, a key process in cancer development. Human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) is commonly expressed in various cancers, including melanoma. This study evaluated hTERT protein expression in melanomas compared to melanocytic nevi. Methods: In total, we examined 75 melanocytic lesions using TERT immunohistochemistry on paraffin-embedded tissues; 36 of them were thin melanomas (Breslow index ≤ 1 mm) and 39 melanocytic nevi. Results: The TERT expression differed with statistical significance between the two studied groups, melanomas and melanocytic nevi, in all three aspects examined: percentage of staining (p = 0.006), intensity of staining (p = 0.035), and localisation of staining (p = 0.012). Three quarters of the melanomas stained in over 50% of the cells at cytoplasmic level, 52.78% of the melanomas exhibited an intensity of 3+, and all melanomas were stained at the cytoplasmic level, except for the two negative cases. The values were lower in the melanocytic nevi group. Still, the diagnostic values were relatively low (sensitivity = 75%, specificity = 58.97%, PPV = 62.79%, NPV = 71.88%, and ACC = 66.67%). Conclusions: TERT immunohistochemistry differed between the two studied groups; however, the diagnostic utility is low in our study. Combining with other immunohistochemical antibodies would probably increase the diagnostic power.

1. Introduction

Telomerase, a ribonucleoprotein reverse transcriptase, facilitates the synthesis of telomeres and helps maintain their length [1]. Telomeres, located at the ends of chromosomes, are made up of repeated “TTAGGG” sequences. They are crucial in preserving genetic information throughout cell division [2]. When telomerase activity is reduced, cells undergo apoptosis, as observed in almost all somatic cells. In contrast, telomerase becomes activated in many cancers, supporting continuous cell proliferation [3]. Telomerase consists of two primary components: the functional RNA component (hTERC), which acts as a template for telomeric DNA synthesis, and the catalytic protein (hTERT), which possesses reverse transcriptase activity [4,5]. The TERT gene, found on chromosome 5, encodes the hTERT catalytic component of the telomerase enzyme [6,7]. In 2013, two somatic mutations were identified in the promoter region of the TERT gene, which are linked to increased TERT expression in melanoma [8,9]. Mutations in the promoter region of the TERT gene tend to arise in the initial stages of melanoma development [10]. They form new sites of binding for E-twenty-six (ETS) and ternary complex transcription factors (TCF), resulting in increased TERT expression [9,11,12]. ETS facilitates NF-κB binding to the mutant TERT promoter, while TRF2 binds to the wild-type TERT promoter. NF-κB and TRF2 activation could impact the TERT gene regulation [13]. The activation or the upregulation of the TERT gene can also happen through other genetic alterations like TERT gene amplifications, TERT gene rearrangements, or epigenetic alterations like TERT promoter hypermethylation [14,15,16,17]. TPP1 promoter mutations work in conjunction with TERT activation to promote telomere maintenance and cellular immortalisation in melanoma [18]. MiR-138-5p targets hTERT and the overexpression of this miRNA showed reduced hTERT protein expression and a reduction in telomerase activity [19].
Telomerase is a target in developing cancer therapies [20]. A telomerase-targeting therapeutic cancer vaccine, UV1, has been developed. This approach has been studied across various cancer types, like melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, and prostate cancer. In a phase I/IIa clinical trial, the aforementioned vaccine was administered alongside Ipilimumab, an anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody, resulting in a faster and more frequent immune response [21]. Ibrahim et al. observed that adding maintenance doses of the UV1 vaccine every three months in melanoma patients led to a higher tumour shrinkage and a higher probability of immune response [22]. There are also other telomerase-targeted cancer vaccines in clinical trials [23]. Imeltestat, a telomerase inhibitor, received approval in the United States in 2024 for treating myelodysplastic syndromes and is under study in more myeloproliferative disorders and non-small-cell lung cancer [24,25,26,27]. A new therapy targeting telomerase, 6-Thio-2′-deoxyguanosine (6TdG), showed promising results in recent studies on small cell lung cancer in mice and human cell lines [28]. The two telomerase-targeting therapies, Imetelstat and 6TdG, combined with chemotherapy regimes, showed improved survival in telomerase-positive neuroblastoma cell lines [29]. Moreover, BRAF-mutated melanomas with increased TERT expression were observed to be resistant to BRAF and MEK inhibitors. For this reason, the simultaneous inhibition of TERT is crucial for a better response to therapy [30]. Telomerase-targeting therapies could also be promising for the management of acral melanomas [31].
The TERT expression can be detected and measured by immunohistochemistry (IHC) as TERT protein levels in tissue samples, by real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) or by in situ hybridisation (ISH) as TERT mRNA levels, by Western blot as protein levels in cell or tissue lysates, or by PCR-based telomeric repeat amplification protocol (TRAP) assays as activity levels of the telomerase [12,14,32,33].
The immunohistochemistry method is simple, cost-effective, fast, and available in almost all histopathological laboratories [34]. The results in the previously published studies are variable regarding the localisation of the staining, the pattern of the staining, or the diagnostic and prognostic utility [32,35,36,37,38]. The positivity of TERT expression did not correlate with TERT promoter mutations [32,36,37].
Our study evaluated whether there are statistically significant differences between TERT immunohistochemistry expression in melanocytic nevi and thin melanomas regarding the percentage, intensity, and localisation of the staining or whether it is associated with other clinicopathological variables. We tried to evaluate the possible diagnostic power in differentiating between benign melanocytic lesions and malignant melanocytic lesions. Only a few studies have been published on TERT immunohistochemistry in melanoma, and none have focused on thin melanomas. No published study included a Romanian population.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Research Design and Methodology

We conducted a retrospective study involving 36 thin melanomas and 39 melanocytic nevi diagnosed at the Department of Dermatovenerology of the Cluj-Napoca Emergency County Hospital from 2014 to 2018. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy Cluj-Napoca, Romania (protocol code 39 from 31 March 2023). All participants provided informed consent, and the study was carried out under the Declaration of Helsinki.

2.2. Immunohistochemical Analysis

Paraffin-embedded tissue blocks were obtained from the Department of Pathology at Cluj-Napoca Emergency County Hospital and were reviewed for diagnostic confirmation by a pathologist (D.C.). We subsequently prepared 5 mm thick tissue sections for immunohistochemical analysis and carried out depigmentation using 3% hydrogen peroxide to eliminate excess melanin. Afterwards, we performed the immunohistochemical staining using the Anti-Telomerase Catalytic Subunit antibody—600-401-252 (rabbit) produced by Rockland in Limerick, Pennsylvania, USA, as they used in the study by Hugdahl et al. [37]. The reliability of the antibody was previously validated in the study by Wu et al. [39]. The staining was carried out on the automated stainer platform from Leica Biosystems, Leica Bond-Max, which was manufactured in Melbourne, UK. We performed the staining using a ph 6 buffer at a 1:500 dilution with a DAB brown chromogen. For the negative control, we omitted the antibody. Eccrine glands and ducts served as positive internal controls. The cases were interpreted by an experienced board-certified anatomopathologist (B.P.), blinded to the patient’s characteristics.
Staining results were documented based on the percentage, intensity, and localisation of the immunoreactive cells. The percentage rate was grouped into 0%, <10%, 10–50%, and >50%. Colour intensity was classified as negative (0), weak (1+), moderate (2+), or strong (3+). Staining localisation was recorded as cytoplasmic, nuclear, or nuclear and cytoplasmic, similar to other studies using TERT antibodies for immunohistochemistry on malignant tumours [40,41,42]. Due to its canonical functions, telomerase is mainly expressed at the nuclear level, but due to its non-canonical functions, it can also be expressed at the cytoplasmic level [43,44].

2.3. Data Analysis and Statistics

All statistical analyses were conducted using MedCalc® Statistical Software version 23.1.6 from MedCalc Software Ltd., Ostend, Belgium (https://www.medcalc.org; 2025). Continuous variables (e.g., age, Breslow index, mitotic rate) were reported as a median and interquartile range since their distribution was not normal. Categorical variables were presented as frequencies and percentages. The Chi-square test (or Fisher’s exact test when expected frequencies were below five) assessed differences between categorical variables, such as TERT staining percentage, intensity, and localisation between melanomas and melanocytic nevi. Given their non-normal distribution, the Mann–Whitney U test was applied to compare continuous variables (e.g., age, Breslow index, mitotic rate) across the study groups. A p-value under 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.

3. Results

Using immunohistochemistry, we examined 36 cases of thin melanomas and 39 cases of melanocytic nevi for TERT protein expression (Figure 1). The melanoma group included 10 stage 0 melanomas, 14 stage IA melanomas, and 12 stage IB melanomas. The majority, 31 melanomas, were superficial spreading melanomas (SSM), 1 lentigo maligna (LM), 2 lentigo maligna melanomas (LMM), and 2 acral lentiginous melanomas (ALM). Patient ages ranged from 26 to 85 years; the mean age was 59.47 and the median was 62. There were 14 female patients and 22 male patients. Regarding the localisation of the tumour, 4 melanomas were located in the head and neck region, 19 in the trunk region, 6 in the upper limb region, and 7 in the lower limb region. A mean Breslow index of 0.45 mm and a median Breslow index of 0.5 mm were observed. The mean mitotic rate was 1.52/mm2, and the median mitotic rate was 1/mm2. In total, 13 melanomas were in the vertical growth phase, while 23 were in the horizontal growth phase. Ten melanomas had developed on a preexistent nevus. A personal history of melanoma was reported in two patients, whereas no patients had a documented family history of melanoma.
The melanocytic nevi group included 31 low-grade dysplastic nevi, 1 high-grade dysplastic nevus, 5 dysplastic nevi with an unspecified grade of dysplasia, 1 Halo nevus (Sutton), and 1 common melanocytic nevus (dermal nevus). In total, 27 melanocytic nevi were compound, 11 junctional nevi, and 1 intradermal nevus. Regarding the localisation, 1 was located in the head and neck region, 26 on the trunk, 4 on the upper limb, and 8 on the lower limb. Two of the low-grade dysplastic nevi had acral localisation. Patient ages ranged from 16 to 67 years, with a mean age of 35.23 and a median age of 33. There were 21 female patients and 18 male patients. No personal history of melanoma was reported, but six patients had a family history of the condition.
About 75% of the melanomas stained in over 50% of the cells, while only 41% of the nevi stained in over 50%. If the cutoff of positivity is 50%, three-quarters of the melanomas were positive for TERT expression, while one-quarter were negative. The positivity in the melanocytic nevi group was lower (41%) than in the melanoma group (75%) (p = 0.006). Regarding the intensity of the staining, more than half of the melanomas were stained with an intensity of 3+, while under one-third of the nevi were stained with this intensity (p = 0.035). All melanomas were stained at the cytoplasmic level except for the two negative cases. In contrast, some melanocytic nevi were stained at the nuclear level or both nuclear and cytoplasmic levels (p = 0.012) (Table 1). For a hypothetical cutoff value of more than 50% stained cells being considered a positive case, the sensitivity was 75%, the specificity 58.97%, the positive predictive value (PPV) 62.79%, the negative predictive value (NPV) 71.88% and the accuracy (ACC) 66.67%.
Variations in TERT expression between benign and malignant melanocytic lesions could have significant clinical relevance, especially in supporting early cancer diagnosis. Integrating TERT staining into pathology assessments could enhance diagnostic accuracy.
The TERT staining in melanoma was present in a higher percentage of the cells, with higher intensity, and only at the cytoplasmic level compared to melanocytic nevi (Figure 2). Most melanomas stained in over 50% of the cells with an intensity of 3+. We used the eccrine glands/ducts as positive internal controls (Figure 3).
When comparing the two melanoma groups—melanoma stage 0 and melanoma stage I—we observed no statistically significant difference regarding the staining percentage, intensity, or localisation of the staining (Table 2). However, there was a trend towards significance regarding the staining percentage (p = 0.09). The cases that stained in over 50% of the cells were more numerous in the group of melanomas stage I compared to melanomas stage 0 (in situ). All melanomas were stained only at the cytoplasmic level.
When we compared the patients with melanomas positive for the TERT staining in over 50% of the cells and the patients with melanomas that stained in under 50% according to clinicopathological variables, a significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding age (p = 0.031), the personal history of melanoma (p = 0.012), and melanomas developed on a preexistent nevus (p = 0.032) (Table 3). The melanoma patients whose tumours stained positive for TERT in over 50% of the cells were older (median = 64 years) than those with melanomas that stained in under 50% (median = 51 years).
No patient with melanoma that stained in over 50% of the cells reported a personal history of melanoma. In comparison, two patients with melanomas that stained in under 50% of the cells reported a personal history of melanoma. The first patient had two other melanomas diagnosed, and the second had five other melanomas diagnosed. No patient included in the study had a known family history of melanoma. A third of the melanomas that stained in over 50% of the cells developed on a preexisting nevus, while none that stained in under 50% of the cells developed on a preexisting nevus. There was also a tendency for significant variations between the two groups regarding the histopathological stage (p = 0.074) and the mitotic rate (p = 0.079). The majority of the melanomas stage IA and IB stained in over 50% of the cells, while half of the melanomas in situ stained in over 50% of the cells and half of them stained in under 50% of the cells. The median mitotic rate was higher in the group of melanomas which showed staining in over 50% of the cells compared to the group with staining in under 50%.
We compared the three different groups of melanomas according to the staining percentage: over 50% of the cells, 10–50% of the cells, or entirely negative. A significant difference was still observed in relation to age (p = 0.034) and personal history of melanoma (p = 0.012) (Table 4). No melanoma stained in 1–9% of the cells. The median age was higher in the group of melanomas that stained in over 50% of the cells (median age = 64 years) compared to the group that stained in 10–50% of the cells (median age = 58) and compared to the entirely negative cases (median age = 47 years). No patient with melanoma that stained in over 50% of the cells reported a personal history of melanoma. Both patients who reported a personal history of melanoma had melanomas that stained in 10–50% of the cells.
When comparing melanocytic nevi with staining in over 50% of cells to those with staining in under 50%, we found no significant difference between the two groups according to clinicopathological variables like sex, age, histopathological subtype, melanocyte localisation, or nevus localisation (Table 5).

4. Discussion

A few studies have been published on TERT immunohistochemistry in melanocytic lesions with highly variable results. Most used the same antibody as in our research at the same or different dilutions, but some used a different antibody. Studies that used the same antibody had more similar results. For example, in the survey conducted by Hugdahl et al., the TERT staining in melanomas was described as homogenous and localised at the cytoplasmic level, as in our study. They used the antibody we used in this study at a different dilution (1:125). The results were interpreted using a staining index, calculated by multiplying the intensity and proportion scores. TERT protein expression was linked to greater tumour thickness and decreased survival [37]. Bustos et al. observed TERT expression in all melanocytic lesions, but the pattern was homogenous in melanocytic nevi and homogeneous or heterogeneous in melanomas. The heterogeneous pattern was associated with a higher Breslow index, fast-growing melanomas, higher mitotic rate, and TERT promoter mutations [38]. In the study conducted by Populo et al., TERT protein expression in melanomas was nuclear and cytoplasmic. We observed nuclear and cytoplasmic expression only in melanocytic nevi. They used the same antibody we used in this study at the same dilution (1:500) and observed no correlation with TERT promoter mutational status, disease-free survival, or overall survival [36]. In this study, there was no association with tumour thickness. However, we observed a trend toward statistical significance regarding the histopathological stage and the mitotic rate. The number of included patients was low, but probably in a larger cohort, the results would have been statistically significant. We found a significant association between TERT protein expression and the patient’s age, the melanoma’s development on a preexisting nevus and the absence of a prior personal diagnosis of melanoma. The association with age or the personal history of melanoma could be spurious because the cohort was small.
Cytoplasmic staining was also observed in other malignant tumours like hepatocellular carcinoma, lung cancer, and cervical cancer [40,41,42]. The signification of cytoplasmic TERT staining associated more frequently with malignant tumours could be due to the non-canonical functions of telomerase reverse transcriptase, like support of cell growth and proliferation, cell cycle progression, and maintenance of mitochondrial integrity in response to the oxidative stress [43,44]. The canonical function of the telomerase, localised at the nuclear level, is to keep the length of the telomeres and enable the cell to achieve unlimited proliferation potential [45]. In the case of oxidative stress telomerase can migrate from nuclear level to cytoplasmic/mitochondrial level [46].
Studies that used other antibodies had different results. For example, Fullen et al. used the hTERT antibody from Novocastra, Newcastle, UK. They observed no statistically significant difference between TERT expression in melanocytic nevi and melanomas, so they considered that TERT immunohistochemistry has no diagnostic role in differentiating benign from malignant melanocytic lesions. Still, they observed an increase in mean TERT expression from acquired nevi to dysplastic nevi and melanomas. The number of included cases was low and they failed to prove a statistically significant difference [35]. In the study by Kohli et al., TERT immunohistochemistry was noted to be localised more frequently at the nucleolus level in benign nevi while at the “non-nucleolar” level in melanomas. They used a different antibody, TERT (EST21-A) from Alpha Diagnostic International at a dilution of 1:50 [32].
In the study conducted by Cho et al. on acral melanoma, TERT protein expression by immunohistochemistry was present in more than half of acral lentiginous melanomas and nonacral cutaneous melanoma, in 40% of the nonlentiginous acral melanomas, in all metastatic acral lentiginous melanomas and no acral nevi. TERT protein expression was not linked with reduced disease-specific survival, although there was a trend toward reduced overall survival without statistical significance [47]. A recent study showed TERT protein expression in half of the primary acral lentiginous melanomas and all metastatic melanomas with variable percentages and intensities. Similar to our research, TERT expression was mainly cytoplasmic. They used an anti-TERT antibody from Abcam, Cambridge, Massachusetts (clone Y182) at a dilution of 1:100. The sensitivity for predicting TERT gene amplification through TERT protein expression by immunohistochemistry was 100%, while the specificity was only 57%; thus, the clinical utility is low [48]. In acral lentiginous melanoma, TERT amplification was observed to be involved in the progression to metastatic disease [49]. Our study included two cases of acral lentiginous melanoma and two cases of low-grade dysplastic nevi with acral localisation. The first melanoma case was stage IA melanoma, positive in over 50% of the cells with an intensity of 3+. The second was a melanoma in situ, positive in 10–50% of the cells with an intensity of 2+. In contrast, one dysplastic nevus with acral localisation was positive in 10–50% of the cells with an intensity of 2, while the other was negative.
Other methods that detect TERT expression are PCR-based telomeric repeat amplification protocol (TRAP), in situ hybridisation (ISH), real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), and Western blot [12,14,32,33]. PCR-based TRAP is the method that detects and quantifies telomerase activity. Higher levels of telomerase activity were noted in melanoma metastases and primary melanomas, and lower levels in dysplastic nevi followed by benign melanocytic nevi [33,50,51,52]. Rudolph et al. observed that the telomerase activity level can have a prognostic value. Early metastasis occurred in cases with high telomerase activity, while cases with lower telomerase activity were linked to absent or slow progression of the disease [52]. In the study by Tosi et al., Spitz nevi showed a lower telomerase activity compared to melanomas [53]. Guttman-Yasky et al. determined hTER expression by in situ hybridisation (ISH), which is less sensitive than the TRAP method. They observed no statistically significant difference among Spitz nevi, common melanocytic nevi and melanomas [54].
Melanomas harbouring TERT promoter mutations are associated with elevated TERT expression by RT-PCR, expressed as high TERT mRNA levels compared to melanomas without mutations [55,56]. TERT promoter mutations in melanomas were linked to decreased disease-specific and overall survival [57,58,59]. TERT promoter methylation is also linked with increased TERT expression, as demonstrated by TERT mRNA in situ hybridisation (ISH) [14]. Increased TERT expression was observed in metastases from primary melanomas with a Breslow index under 2 mm and could contribute to early metastasis [60]. TERT promoter methylation, combined with TERT promoter mutations or without showed reduced recurrence-free survival in adolescent and young adult melanoma patients [61].
There is a lot of variability between the different studies published on TERT immunohistochemistry in melanocytic lesions. Different antibodies could explain some differences, but not all of them. This study was conducted on a limited cohort of Romanian melanoma patients and focused exclusively on thin melanomas. No previous research has focused on thin melanomas, which is the novelty of this study. There are also possible genetic, clinical, and histopathological differences in the Romanian population compared to other Eastern populations. The reported BRAF mutation in Romanian melanoma patients is similar to that in other countries [62,63]. The clinical and histopathological characteristics are also comparable to those of other European countries. There is a predominance of melanomas in female patients, similar to that of the Spanish and French populations. The median age at diagnosis is also close to that in other European countries. Superficial spreading melanoma is the most frequent melanoma subtype, similar to Spain and Serbia [64].
A statistically significant difference was observed between melanomas and melanocytic nevi regarding percentage, intensity, and localisation of the colouration. However, if we considered a hypothetical cutoff value of the presence of the staining in more than 50% of the cells as being positive, the specificity (58.97%) and accuracy (66.67%) were low. The diagnostic value and, consequently, clinical utility of the TERT immunohistochemistry on its own are relatively limited; probably, combined with other immunohistochemical stainings, the diagnostic value would improve. However, if we considered positive cases only, the ones that stained in over 50% of the cells at the cytoplasmic level, the diagnostic value would improve slightly. Still, correlations with other immunohistochemical stainings would be beneficial.
Further studies on this method, including larger cohorts and correlations with other methods detecting TERT expression, could bring valuable information. Hugdahl et al. observed a correlation between TERT expression and reduced survival, meaning that this immunohistochemical colouration could have a prognostic role in more advanced cases [37].

5. Conclusions

The TERT immunohistochemistry differed with statistical significance between the two studied groups in all three aspects: percentage of the staining, intensity of the staining, and localisation of the staining. Melanomas were stained only at the cytoplasmic level, and the percentage and intensity of the staining were greater in the melanoma group than in the melanocytic nevi group. However, the diagnostic power was relatively low in our study. Still, the combination with other immunohistochemical antibodies could increase the diagnostic utility. Larger multicenter studies on larger cohorts are needed. This immunohistochemical analysis may provide valuable support to conventional diagnostic criteria, but it is not intended to replace them.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.Z., L.U., S.C.Ș., B.P. and R.C.; methodology, L.U., S.C.Ș., B.P., P.Z., D.C. and R.C.; software, B.P., P.Z. and Ș.C.V.; validation, B.P., P.Z. and Ș.C.V.; formal analysis, Ș.C.V.; investigation, I.Z., B.P., P.Z. and F.A.Z.; resources, I.Z., P.Z., D.C. and F.A.Z.; data curation, I.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, I.Z.; writing—review and editing, L.U., S.C.Ș., B.P., P.Z., D.C., F.A.Z., Ș.C.V. and R.C.; visualization, B.P.; supervision, R.C.; project administration, I.Z. and R.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was carried out in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki and received approval from the Ethics Committee of “Iuliu Hațieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Cluj-Napoca, Romania (protocol code 39 from 31 March 2023) for studies involving humans.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data used or analysed during this study can be obtained from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

This manuscript includes the following abbreviations:
TERTTelomerase reverse transcriptase
PPVPositive predictive value
NPVNegative predictive value
ACCAccuracy
TRAPTelomeric Repeat Amplification Protocol
ETSE-twenty-six
TCFTernary complex transcription factors
RT-PCRReal-time polymerase chain reaction
ISHIn situ hybridisation
IHCImmunohistochemistry
SSMSuperficial spreading melanomas
LMLentigo maligna
LMMLentigo maligna melanoma
ALMAcral lentiginous melanoma
H&EHematoxiylin and eosin

References

  1. Blackburn, E.H. Structure and function of telomeres. Nature 1991, 350, 569–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Moyzis, R.K.; Buckingham, J.M.; Cram, L.S.; Dani, M.; Deaven, L.L.; Jones, M.D.; Meyne, J.; Ratliff, R.L.; Wu, J.R. A highly conserved repetitive DNA sequence, (TTAGGG)n, present at the telomeres of human chromosomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1988, 85, 6622–6626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hahn, W.C.; Meyerson, M. Telomerase activation, cellular immortalization and cancer. Ann. Med. 2001, 33, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Feng, J.; Funk, W.D.; Wang, S.S.; Weinrich, S.L.; Avilion, A.A.; Chiu, C.P.; Adams, R.R.; Chang, E.; Allsopp, R.C.; Yu, J. The RNA component of human telomerase. Science 1995, 269, 1236–1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lingner, J.; Hughes, T.R.; Shevchenko, A.; Mann, M.; Lundblad, V.; Cech, T.R. Reverse transcriptase motifs in the catalytic subunit of telomerase. Science 1997, 276, 561–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Cong, Y.S.; Wen, J.; Bacchetti, S. The human telomerase catalytic subunit hTERT: Organization of the gene and characterization of the promoter. Hum. Mol. Genet. 1999, 8, 137–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wick, M.; Zubov, D.; Hagen, G. Genomic organization and promoter characterization of the gene encoding the human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT). Gene 1999, 232, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Huang, F.W.; Hodis, E.; Xu, M.J.; Kryukov, G.V.; Chin, L.; Garraway, L.A. Highly recurrent TERT promoter mutations in human melanoma. Science 2013, 339, 957–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Horn, S.; Figl, A.; Rachakonda, P.S.; Fischer, C.; Sucker, A.; Gast, A.; Kadel, S.; Moll, I.; Nagore, E.; Hemminki, K.; et al. TERT promoter mutations in familial and sporadic melanoma. Science 2013, 339, 959–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shain, A.H.; Yeh, I.; Kovalyshyn, I.; Sriharan, A.; Talevich, E.; Gagnon, A.; Dummer, R.; North, J.; Pincus, L.; Ruben, B.; et al. The Genetic Evolution of Melanoma from Precursor Lesions. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 373, 1926–1936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Heidenreich, B.; Rachakonda, P.S.; Hemminki, K.; Kumar, R. TERT promoter mutations in cancer development. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2014, 24, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Vallarelli, A.F.; Rachakonda, P.S.; André, J.; Heidenreich, B.; Riffaud, L.; Bensussan, A.; Kumar, R.; Dumaz, N. TERT promoter mutations in melanoma render TERT expression dependent on MAPK pathway activation. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 53127–53136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Sharma, S.; Chowdhury, S. Emerging mechanisms of telomerase reactivation in cancer. Trends Cancer 2022, 8, 632–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fan, Y.; Lee, S.; Wu, G.; Easton, J.; Yergeau, D.; Dummer, R.; Vogel, P.; Kirkwood, J.M.; Barnhill, R.L.; Pappo, A.; et al. Telomerase Expression by Aberrant Methylation of the TERT Promoter in Melanoma Arising in Giant Congenital Nevi. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2016, 136, 339–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yuan, X.; Larsson, C.; Xu, D. Mechanisms underlying the activation of TERT transcription and telomerase activity in human cancer: Old actors and new players. Oncogene 2019, 38, 6172–6183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Barthel, F.P.; Wei, W.; Tang, M.; Martinez-Ledesma, E.; Hu, X.; Amin, S.B.; Akdemir, K.C.; Seth, S.; Song, X.; Wang, Q.; et al. Systematic analysis of telomere length and somatic alterations in 31 cancer types. Nat. Genet. 2017, 49, 349–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Salgado, C.; Roelse, C.; Nell, R.; Gruis, N.; van Doorn, R.; van der Velden, P. Interplay between TERT promoter mutations and methylation culminates in chromatin accessibility and TERT expression. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0231418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Chun-on, P.; Hinchie, A.M.; Beale, H.C.; Gil Silva, A.A.; Rush, E.; Sander, C.; Connelly, C.J.; Seynnaeve, B.K.N.; Kirkwood, J.M.; Vaske, O.M.; et al. TPP1 promoter mutations cooperate with TERT promoter mutations to lengthen telomeres in melanoma. Science 2022, 378, 664–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tarazón, E.; de Unamuno Bustos, B.; Murria Estal, R.; Pérez Simó, G.; Sahuquillo Torralba, A.; Simarro, J.; Palanca Suela, S.; Botella Estrada, R. MiR-138-5p Suppresses Cell Growth and Migration in Melanoma by Targeting Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase. Genes 2021, 12, 1931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Guterres, A.N.; Villanueva, J. TARGETING TELOMERASE FOR CANCER THERAPY. Oncogene 2020, 39, 5811–5824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ellingsen, E.B.; Aamdal, E.; Guren, T.; Lilleby, W.; Brunsvig, P.F.; Mangsbo, S.M.; Aamdal, S.; Hovig, E.; Mensali, N.; Gaudernack, G.; et al. Durable and dynamic hTERT immune responses following vaccination with the long-peptide cancer vaccine UV1: Long-term follow-up of three phase I clinical trials. J. Immunother. Cancer 2022, 10, e004345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ibrahim, E.I.K.; Ellingsen, E.B.; Mangsbo, S.M.; Friberg, L.E. Bridging responses to a human telomerase reverse transcriptase-based peptide cancer vaccine candidate in a mechanism-based model. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2024, 126, 111225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Mizukoshi, E.; Kaneko, S. Telomerase-Targeted Cancer Immunotherapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. FDA. FDA Approves Imetelstat for Low- to Intermediate-1 Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes with Transfusion-Dependent Anemia; FDA: Silver Spring, MD, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  25. Keam, S.J. Imetelstat: First Approval. Drugs 2024, 84, 1149–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Olschok, K.; Altenburg, B.; de Toledo, M.A.S.; Maurer, A.; Abels, A.; Beier, F.; Gezer, D.; Isfort, S.; Paeschke, K.; Brümmendorf, T.H.; et al. The telomerase inhibitor imetelstat differentially targets JAK2V617F versus CALR mutant myeloproliferative neoplasm cells and inhibits JAK-STAT signaling. Front. Oncol. 2023, 13, 1277453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Chiappori, A.A.; Kolevska, T.; Spigel, D.R.; Hager, S.; Rarick, M.; Gadgeel, S.; Blais, N.; Von Pawel, J.; Hart, L.; Reck, M.; et al. A randomized phase II study of the telomerase inhibitor imetelstat as maintenance therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann. Oncol. 2015, 26, 354–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Eglenen-Polat, B.; Kowash, R.R.; Huang, H.-C.; Siteni, S.; Zhu, M.; Chen, K.; Bender, M.E.; Mender, I.; Stastny, V.; Drapkin, B.J.; et al. A telomere-targeting drug depletes cancer initiating cells and promotes anti-tumor immunity in small cell lung cancer. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fischer-Mertens, J.; Otte, F.; Roderwieser, A.; Rosswog, C.; Kahlert, Y.; Werr, L.; Hellmann, A.-M.; Berding, M.; Chiu, B.; Bartenhagen, C.; et al. Telomerase-targeting compounds Imetelstat and 6-thio-dG act synergistically with chemotherapy in high-risk neuroblastoma models. Cell. Oncol. 2022, 45, 991–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Delyon, J.; Vallet, A.; Bernard-Cacciarella, M.; Kuzniak, I.; Reger de Moura, C.; Louveau, B.; Jouenne, F.; Mourah, S.; Lebbé, C.; Dumaz, N. TERT Expression Induces Resistance to BRAF and MEK Inhibitors in BRAF-Mutated Melanoma In Vitro. Cancers 2023, 15, 2888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bollu, V.S.; Chen, Y.-C.; Zhang, F.; Gowda, K.; Amin, S.; Sharma, A.K.; Schell, T.D.; Zhu, J.; Robertson, G.P. Managing telomerase and telomere dysfunction in acral melanoma. Pharmacol. Res. 2025, 215, 107700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kohli, J.S.; Mir, H.; Wasif, A.; Chong, H.; Akhras, V.; Kumar, R.; Nagore, E.; Bennett, D.C. ETS1, nucleolar and non-nucleolar TERT expression in nevus to melanoma progression. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 104408–104417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Glaessl, A.; Bosserhoff, A.K.; Buettner, R.; Hohenleutner, U.; Landthaler, M.; Stolz, W. Increase in telomerase activity during progression of melanocytic cells from melanocytic naevi to malignant melanomas. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 1999, 291, 81–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wakefield, C.; Hornick, J.L. Update on immunohistochemistry in bone and soft tissue tumors: Cost-effectively replacing molecular testing with immunohistochemistry. Hum. Pathol. 2024, 147, 58–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Fullen, D.R.; Zhu, W.; Thomas, D.; Su, L.D. hTERT expression in melanocytic lesions: An immunohistochemical study on paraffin-embedded tissue. J. Cutan. Pathol. 2005, 32, 680–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Pópulo, H.; Boaventura, P.; Vinagre, J.; Batista, R.; Mendes, A.; Caldas, R.; Pardal, J.; Azevedo, F.; Honavar, M.; Guimarães, I.; et al. TERT promoter mutations in skin cancer: The effects of sun exposure and X-irradiation. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2014, 134, 2251–2257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hugdahl, E.; Kalvenes, M.B.; Mannelqvist, M.; Ladstein, R.G.; Akslen, L.A. Prognostic impact and concordance of TERT promoter mutation and protein expression in matched primary and metastatic cutaneous melanoma. Br. J. Cancer 2018, 118, 98–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. de Unamuno Bustos, B.; Sahuquillo Torralba, A.; Moles Poveda, P.; Pérez Simó, G.; Simarro Farinos, J.; Llavador Ros, M.; Palanca Suela, S.; Botella Estrada, R. Telomerase Expression in a Series of Melanocytic Neoplasms. Actas Dermo-Sifiliogr. 2019, 110, 212–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wu, Y.-L.; Dudognon, C.; Nguyen, E.; Hillion, J.; Pendino, F.; Tarkanyi, I.; Aradi, J.; Lanotte, M.; Tong, J.-H.; Chen, G.-Q.; et al. Immunodetection of human telomerase reverse-transcriptase (hTERT) re-appraised: Nucleolin and telomerase cross paths. J. Cell Sci. 2006, 119, 2797–2806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gomatou, G.; Masaoutis, C.; Vamvakaris, I.; Kotteas, E.; Bouros, E.; Tzilas, V.; Bouros, D. Differential immunohistochemical expression of hTERT in lung cancer patients with and without idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Pulmonology 2024, 30, 214–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Nishi, Y.; Aoki, T.; Shimizu, T.; Sato, S.; Matsumoto, T.; Shiraki, T.; Sakuraoka, Y.; Mori, S.; Iso, Y.; Ishizuka, M.; et al. Significance of cytoplasmic expression of telomerase reverse transcriptase in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing liver resection. Mol. Clin. Oncol. 2021, 15, 244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Moreno-Acosta, P.; Molano, M.; Morales, N.; Acosta, J.; GonzÁlez-Prieto, C.; Mayorga, D.; Buitrago, L.; Gamboa, O.; MejÍa, J.C.; Castro, J.; et al. hTERT Protein Expression in Cytoplasm and Nucleus and its Association with HPV Infection in Patients with Cervical Cancer. Cancer Genom. Proteom. 2020, 17, 615–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Thompson, C.A.H.; Wong, J.M.Y. Non-canonical Functions of Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase: Emerging Roles and Biological Relevance. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2020, 20, 498–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Rosen, J.; Jakobs, P.; Ale-Agha, N.; Altschmied, J.; Haendeler, J. Non-canonical functions of Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase—Impact on redox homeostasis. Redox Biol. 2020, 34, 101543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Ghareghomi, S.; Ahmadian, S.; Zarghami, N.; Kahroba, H. Fundamental insights into the interaction between telomerase/TERT and intracellular signaling pathways. Biochimie 2021, 181, 12–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Muzza, M.; Pogliaghi, G.; Colombo, C.; Grassi, E.S.; Carbone, E.; Palazzo, S.; Frattini, F.; Gazzano, G.; Persani, L.; Fugazzola, L. Extra-nuclear TERT counteracts oxidative stress and promotes progression in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Transl. Res. 2024, 271, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Cho, W.C.; Wang, W.-L.; Milton, D.R.; Ingram, D.R.; Nagarajan, P.; Curry, J.L.; Ivan, D.; Lazar, A.J.; Hwu, W.-J.; Prieto, V.G.; et al. Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase Protein Expression Is More Frequent in Acral Lentiginous Melanoma Than in Other Types of Cutaneous Melanoma. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2021, 145, 842–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Cho, W.C.; Li, W.; Gu, J.; Wang, W.-L.; Ning, J.; Sfamenos, S.; Gill, P.; Nagarajan, P.; Curry, J.L.; Lazar, A.J.; et al. Telomerase reverse transcriptase immunohistochemical expression is sensitive but not specific for TERT gene amplification in acral melanoma. J. Cutan. Pathol. 2023, 50, 845–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ramani, N.S.; Aung, P.P.; Gu, J.; Sfamenos, S.; Sdringola-Maranga, C.; Nagarajan, P.; Tetzlaff, M.T.; Curry, J.L.; Ivan, D.; Diab, A.; et al. TERT amplification but not activation of canonical Wnt/β-catenin pathway is involved in acral lentiginous melanoma progression to metastasis. Mod. Pathol. 2020, 33, 2067–2074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ramirez, R.D.; D’Atri, S.; Pagani, E.; Faraggiana, T.; Lacal, P.M.; Taylor, R.S.; Shay, J.W. Progressive Increase in Telomerase Activity From Benign Melanocytic Conditions to Malignant Melanoma. Neoplasia 1999, 1, 42–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Miracco, C.; Pacenti, L.; Santopietro, R.; Laurini, L.; Biagioli, M.; Luzi, P. Evaluation of telomerase activity in cutaneous melanocytic proliferations. Hum. Pathol. 2000, 31, 1018–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Rudolph, P.; Schubert, C.; Tamm, S.; Heidorn, K.; Hauschild, A.; Michalska, I.; Majewski, S.; Krupp, G.; Jablonska, S.; Parwaresch, R. Telomerase Activity in Melanocytic Lesions. Am. J. Pathol. 2000, 156, 1425–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Tosi, P.; Miracco, C.; Santopietro, R.; Pacenti, L.; Perotti, R.; Materno, M.; Luzi, P. Possible diagnostic role of telomerase activity evaluation in the differential diagnosis between spitz naevi and cutaneous malignant melanoma. Br. J. Dermatol. 2000, 142, 1060–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Guttman-Yassky, E.; Bergman, R.; Manov, L.; Sprecher, E.; Shaefer, Y.; Kerner, H. Human telomerase RNA component expression in Spitz nevi, common melanocytic nevi, and malignant melanomas. J. Cutan. Pathol. 2002, 29, 341–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Heidenreich, B.; Nagore, E.; Rachakonda, P.S.; Garcia-Casado, Z.; Requena, C.; Traves, V.; Becker, J.; Soufir, N.; Hemminki, K.; Kumar, R. Telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter mutations in primary cutaneous melanoma. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Lee, S.; Opresko, P.; Pappo, A.; Kirkwood, J.M.; Bahrami, A. Association of TERT promoter mutations with telomerase expression in melanoma. Pigment. Cell Melanoma Res. 2016, 29, 391–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Griewank, K.G.; Murali, R.; Puig-Butille, J.A.; Schilling, B.; Livingstone, E.; Potrony, M.; Carrera, C.; Schimming, T.; Möller, I.; Schwamborn, M.; et al. TERT promoter mutation status as an independent prognostic factor in cutaneous melanoma. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2014, 106, dju246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Nagore, E.; Heidenreich, B.; Rachakonda, S.; Garcia-Casado, Z.; Requena, C.; Soriano, V.; Frank, C.; Traves, V.; Quecedo, E.; Sanjuan-Gimenez, J.; et al. TERT promoter mutations in melanoma survival. Int. J. Cancer 2016, 139, 75–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Andrés-Lencina, J.J.; Rachakonda, S.; García-Casado, Z.; Srinivas, N.; Skorokhod, A.; Requena, C.; Soriano, V.; Kumar, R.; Nagore, E. TERT promoter mutation subtypes and survival in stage I and II melanoma patients. Int. J. Cancer 2019, 144, 1027–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kuhn, C.K.; Meister, J.; Kreft, S.; Stiller, M.; Puppel, S.-H.; Zaremba, A.; Scheffler, B.; Ullrich, V.; Schöneberg, T.; Schadendorf, D.; et al. TERT expression is associated with metastasis from thin primaries, exhausted CD4+ T cells in melanoma and with DNA repair across cancer entities. PLoS ONE 2023, 18, e0281487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Seynnaeve, B.; Lee, S.; Borah, S.; Park, Y.; Pappo, A.; Kirkwood, J.M.; Bahrami, A. Genetic and Epigenetic Alterations of TERT Are Associated with Inferior Outcome in Adolescent and Young Adult Patients with Melanoma. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 45704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Avădănei, E.-R.; Căruntu, I.-D.; Nucă, I.; Balan, R.; Lozneanu, L.; Giusca, S.-E.; Amalinei, C. BRAF V600E Mutation in Malignant Melanoma—A Romanian Research Experience. Medicina 2024, 60, 351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Castellani, G.; Buccarelli, M.; Arasi, M.B.; Rossi, S.; Pisanu, M.E.; Bellenghi, M.; Lintas, C.; Tabolacci, C. BRAF Mutations in Melanoma: Biological Aspects, Therapeutic Implications, and Circulating Biomarkers. Cancers 2023, 15, 4026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Apostu, A.P.; Ungureanu, L.; Piciu, A.; Vesa Ștefan, C.; Halmagyi, S.R.; Trufin, I.I.; Frațilă, S.; Iancu, G.; Șenilă, S.C. Melanoma in Northwestern Romania: An Analysis of Epidemiological and Histopathological Characteristics and Associated Risk Factors. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Diagnostics 15 01171 g001
Figure 1. Study design—melanocytic tumors distribution.
Figure 1. Study design—melanocytic tumors distribution.
Diagnostics 15 01171 g001
Diagnostics 15 01171 g002
Figure 2. TERT versus hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) immunohistochemistry in melanoma: (a) TERT IHC—superficial spreading melanoma stage IB, staining in more than 50% of the cells, intensity 3+, cytoplasmic staining; (b) H&E IHC of the same case—superficial spreading melanoma stage IB.
Figure 2. TERT versus hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) immunohistochemistry in melanoma: (a) TERT IHC—superficial spreading melanoma stage IB, staining in more than 50% of the cells, intensity 3+, cytoplasmic staining; (b) H&E IHC of the same case—superficial spreading melanoma stage IB.
Diagnostics 15 01171 g002
Diagnostics 15 01171 g003
Figure 3. The eccrine glands and ducts were used as a positive internal control for TERT immunohistochemistry.
Figure 3. The eccrine glands and ducts were used as a positive internal control for TERT immunohistochemistry.
Diagnostics 15 01171 g003
Table 1. TERT immunohistochemical analysis in melanomas with Breslow index ≤ 1 mm compared to melanocytic nevi.
Table 1. TERT immunohistochemical analysis in melanomas with Breslow index ≤ 1 mm compared to melanocytic nevi.
Variable NevusMelanomaChi-Square p-Value
Staining percentage N (%)0%8 (20.51)2 (5.56)0.006
<10%6 (15.38)0 (0)
10–50%9 (23.08)7 (19.44)
>50%16 (41.03)27 (75)
Color intensity N (%)08 (20.51)2 (5.56)0.035
1+9 (23.08)5 (13.89)
2+13 (33.33)10 (27.78)
3+9 (23.08)19 (52.78)
Staining localisation N (%)Negative8 (20.51)2 (5.56)0.012
Cytoplasmic25 (64.1)34 (94.44)
Nuclear3 (7.69)0 (0)
Nuclear and cytoplasmic3 (7.69)0 (0)
Table 2. TERT immunohistochemistry in melanoma in situ versus melanoma stage I.
Table 2. TERT immunohistochemistry in melanoma in situ versus melanoma stage I.
Variable Melanoma Stage 0 (In Situ)Melanoma Stage Ip-Value
Staining percentage N (%)0%1 (10)1 (3.85%)0.09
<10%--
10–50%4 (40)3 (11.53%)
>50%5 (50)22 (84.62%)
Color intensity N (%)01 (10)1 (3.85%)0.4
1+2 (20)3 (11.54%)
2+1 (10)9 (34.61%)
3+6 (60)13 (50%)
Staining localisation N (%)Negative1 (10)1 (4%)0.4
Cytoplasmic9 (90)25 (96%)
Table 3. Comparison of TERT staining in melanomas with over 50% positive cells versus those with under 50% positive cells, based on clinicopathological variables.
Table 3. Comparison of TERT staining in melanomas with over 50% positive cells versus those with under 50% positive cells, based on clinicopathological variables.
Variable TERT Negative Melanoma (10–50%, <10%, 0%)TERT Positive Melanoma (>50%)p-Value
Sex N (%)M4 (44.44)18 (66.67)0.236
F5 (55.56)9 (33.33)
Median age [years] [IQR]51 (49; 58)64 (59; 68.5)0.031
Localisation N (%)Head and neck1 (11.11)3 (11.11)0.460
Trunk4 (44.44)15 (55.56)
Upper limb3 (33.33)3 (11.11)
Lower limb1 (11.11)6 (22.22)
Histopathological subtype N (%)SSM8 (88.89)23 (85.19)0.642
LMM0 (0)2 (7.41)
LM0 (0)1 (3.7)
ALM1 (11.11)1 (3.7)
Vertical growth N (%)No6 (66.67)17 (62.96)0.841
Yes3 (33.33)10 (37.04)
Stage N (%)In situ5 (55.56)5 (18.52)0.074
IA3 (33.33)11 (40.74)
IB1 (11.11)11 (40.74)
Ulceration N (%)No9 (100)26 (96.3)0.558
Yes0 (0)1 (3.7)
Regression N (%)No8 (88.89)22 (81.48)0.606
Yes1 (11.11)5 (18.52)
Median Breslow index [IQR]0 (0; 0.75)0.6 (0.375; 0.7)0.193
Median mitotic rate [IQR]0 (0; 1)1 (0; 3)0.079
Personal history of melanomaNo7 (77.78)27 (100)0.012
Yes2 (22.22)0 (0)
Nevus-associated melanomaNo9 (100)17 (62.96)0.032
Yes0 (0)10 (37.04)
SSM—superficial spreading melanoma, LMM—lentigo maligna melanoma, LM—lentigo maligna, ALM—acral lentiginous melanoma.
Table 4. Comparison between TERT staining percentages in patients with melanoma according to clinicopathological variables.
Table 4. Comparison between TERT staining percentages in patients with melanoma according to clinicopathological variables.
Variable >50%10–50%0%p-Value
Sex N (%)M18 (66.67)3 (42.86)1 (50)0.488
F9 (33.33)4 (57.14)1 (50)
Median age [years] [IQR]64 (59; 68.5)58 (50.5; 59.5)47 (46; 48)0.034
Localisation N (%)Head and neck3 (11.11)1 (14.29)0 (0)0.747
Trunk15 (55.56)3 (42.86)1 (50)
Upper limb3 (11.11)2 (28.57)1 (50)
Lower limb6 (22.22)1 (14.29)0 (0)
Histopathological subtype N (%)SSM23 (85.19)6 (85.71)2 (100)0.892
LMM2 (7.41)0 (0)0 (0)
LM1 (3.7)0 (0)0 (0)
ALM1 (3.7)1 (14.29)0 (0)
Vertical growth N (%)No17 (62.96)5 (71.43)1 (50)0.840
Yes10 (37.04)2 (28.57)1 (50)
Stage N (%)In situ5 (18.52)4 (57.14)1 (50)0.239
IA11 (40.74)2 (28.57)1 (50)
IB11 (40.74)1 (14.29)0 (0)
Ulceration N (%)No26 (96.3)7 (100)2 (100)0.842
Yes1 (3.7)0 (0)0 (0)
Regression N (%)No22 (81.48)6 (85.71)2 (100)0.781
Yes5 (18.52)1 (14.29)0 (0)
Median Breslow index [IQR]1 (0; 3)1 (0; 1)0 (0; 0)0.336
Median mitotic rate [IQR]0.6 (0.38; 0.7)0 (0; 0.72)0.45 (0.22; 0.68)0.632
Personal history of melanomaNo27 (100)5 (71.43)2 (100)0.012
Yes0 (0)2 (28.57)0 (0)
Nevus-associated melanomaNo17 (62.96)7 (100)2 (100)0.099
Yes10 (37.04)0 (0)0 (0)
Table 5. Comparison between melanocytic nevi according to the percentage of the staining and clinicopathological variables.
Table 5. Comparison between melanocytic nevi according to the percentage of the staining and clinicopathological variables.
Variable TERT Negative Nevus (10–50%, <10%, 0%)TERT Positive Nevus (>50%)p-Value
Sex N (%)M11 (47.83)7 (43.75)0.802
F12 (52.17)9 (56.25)
Median age (years) [IQR]34 (27.5; 44)25.5 (21.75; 41.5)0.803
Histopathological subtype N (%)Low-grade dysplastic nevus20 (86.96)11 (68.75)0.319
High-grade dysplastic nevus0 (0)1 (6.25)
Dysplastic nevus with an unspecified grade of dysplasia2 (8.7)3 (18.75)
Halo nevus0 (0)1 (6.25)
Common melanocytic nevus (Dermal nevus)1 (4.35)0 (0)
Melanocytes localisation N (%)Compound nevus14 (60.87)13 (81.25)0.346
Junctional nevus8 (34.78)3 (18.75)
Intradermal nevus1 (4.35)0 (0)
Nevus localisation N (%)Head and neck1 (4.35)0 (0)0.695
Trunk14 (60.87)12 (75)
Upper limb3 (13.04)1 (6.25)
Lower limb5 (21.74)3 (18.75)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zboraș, I.; Ungureanu, L.; Șenilă, S.C.; Petrushev, B.; Zamfir, P.; Crișan, D.; Zaharie, F.A.; Vesa, Ș.C.; Cosgarea, R. TERT Immunohistochemistry in Thin Melanomas Compared to Melanocytic Nevi. Diagnostics 2025, 15, 1171. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15091171

AMA Style

Zboraș I, Ungureanu L, Șenilă SC, Petrushev B, Zamfir P, Crișan D, Zaharie FA, Vesa ȘC, Cosgarea R. TERT Immunohistochemistry in Thin Melanomas Compared to Melanocytic Nevi. Diagnostics. 2025; 15(9):1171. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15091171

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zboraș, Iulia, Loredana Ungureanu, Simona Corina Șenilă, Bobe Petrushev, Paula Zamfir, Doinița Crișan, Flaviu Andrei Zaharie, Ștefan Cristian Vesa, and Rodica Cosgarea. 2025. "TERT Immunohistochemistry in Thin Melanomas Compared to Melanocytic Nevi" Diagnostics 15, no. 9: 1171. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15091171

APA Style

Zboraș, I., Ungureanu, L., Șenilă, S. C., Petrushev, B., Zamfir, P., Crișan, D., Zaharie, F. A., Vesa, Ș. C., & Cosgarea, R. (2025). TERT Immunohistochemistry in Thin Melanomas Compared to Melanocytic Nevi. Diagnostics, 15(9), 1171. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15091171

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop