Next Article in Journal
Morphological Analysis of the Cavernous Segment of the Internal Carotid Artery: A Retrospective, Single Center Study of Its Clinical Significance
Previous Article in Journal
A Comprehensive Review Comparing Artificial Intelligence and Clinical Diagnostic Approaches for Dry Eye Disease
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Predictors of Unfavorable Outcomes in Diabetic Foot Ulcers

by
Renata Pauliukienė
1,
Kristina Šutienė
2,
Aistė Čemerkaitė
3 and
Jonas Čeponis
3,*
1
Department of Endocrinology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Eiveniu 2, LT-50161 Kaunas, Lithuania
2
Department of Mathematical Modeling, Kaunas University of Technology, Studentu 50, LT-51368 Kaunas, Lithuania
3
Institute of Endocrinology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Eiveniu 2, LT-50161 Kaunas, Lithuania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2025, 15(23), 3070; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15233070
Submission received: 17 October 2025 / Revised: 23 November 2025 / Accepted: 29 November 2025 / Published: 2 December 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chronic Wounds: Diagnosis and Management)

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The aim of this study was to identify systemic, metabolic, and host-related prognostic factors for long-term outcomes in patients with a diabetic foot ulcer (DFU). Methods: One hundred patients were selected from a high-risk cohort of 426 individuals with a DFU (January 2021–January 2023) based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Clinical, laboratory, and imaging data were collected. Outcomes were categorized as favorable (healing) or unfavorable (non-healing, re-ulceration, amputation, or death). Prognostic factors were analyzed using random forest and categorical boosting models, with SHAP values to determine the importance of individual predictors. Results: The median age of participants was 65 years (interquartile range [IQR], 57–69.25), and the median duration of diabetes was 18 years (IQR, 12–26). Over a mean 2.1-year follow-up, unfavorable outcomes occurred in 53% of the whole cohort and in 36% of survivors. The strongest predictors of poor prognosis were prior amputation, elevated inflammatory markers, reduced eGFR, and dyslipidemia. Triglycerides showed a U-shaped association with outcomes. A lower BMI and shorter diabetes duration paradoxically were also linked to poorer prognosis. Glycemic control, comorbidities, and local foot characteristics had limited predictive value. Conclusions: Long-term DFU prognosis is driven mainly by systemic and host-related factors rather than by ulcer characteristics alone. Inflammation, renal dysfunction, dyslipidemia—particularly triglycerides—and prior amputation were the strongest predictors of unfavorable outcomes.
Keywords: diabetes mellitus; diabetic foot ulcer; outcomes; risk factors; machine learning analysis diabetes mellitus; diabetic foot ulcer; outcomes; risk factors; machine learning analysis

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pauliukienė, R.; Šutienė, K.; Čemerkaitė, A.; Čeponis, J. Predictors of Unfavorable Outcomes in Diabetic Foot Ulcers. Diagnostics 2025, 15, 3070. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15233070

AMA Style

Pauliukienė R, Šutienė K, Čemerkaitė A, Čeponis J. Predictors of Unfavorable Outcomes in Diabetic Foot Ulcers. Diagnostics. 2025; 15(23):3070. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15233070

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pauliukienė, Renata, Kristina Šutienė, Aistė Čemerkaitė, and Jonas Čeponis. 2025. "Predictors of Unfavorable Outcomes in Diabetic Foot Ulcers" Diagnostics 15, no. 23: 3070. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15233070

APA Style

Pauliukienė, R., Šutienė, K., Čemerkaitė, A., & Čeponis, J. (2025). Predictors of Unfavorable Outcomes in Diabetic Foot Ulcers. Diagnostics, 15(23), 3070. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15233070

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop