There was an error in the original publication [1] regarding the antibody concentration.
A correction has been made to Materials and Methods, Basophil Activation Test, Paragraph 1:
Fresh heparinized whole blood was mixed with RPMI 1640 Medium, GlutaMAX™ (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with a ratio of 1:1 or 5:2, preheated to 37 °C, containing 6.25 µg/mL CD63 antibody and the allergen extract or control.
Another error in the original publication concerned the spelling of the cited author’s name, “Behrends”.
A correction has been made to Discussion, Paragraph 4:
So far, there are two remarkable automation approaches by Patil et al. [34] and Behrends et al. [25] that both utilize automated gating strategies using Bioconductor tools in the R environment.
The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.
Reference
- Groffmann, J.; Hoppe, I.; Ahmed, W.A.N.; Hoang, Y.; Gryzik, S.; Radbruch, A.; Worm, M.; Beyer, K.; Baumgrass, R. Identification of a New and Effective Marker Combination for a Standardized and Automated Bin-Based Basophil Activation Test (BAT) Analysis. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 1959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).