1. Introduction
Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, continues to exert a formidable global health impact [
1]. Although vaccination programs and improved therapies have mitigated mortality, a substantial number of patients progress to severe disease, especially those with comorbidities and dysregulated immune responses [
2,
3]. Early in the pandemic, scholars observed coagulopathy and thrombosis as major contributors to morbidity and mortality [
4]. However, it became evident that COVID-19 is more than just a respiratory infection—it involves a complex pathophysiological interplay of hyperinflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and multi-organ injury [
5].
A central aspect of COVID-19 coagulopathy is the elevated D-dimer, reflecting ongoing fibrin formation and degradation [
6,
7]. Numerous investigations identify high D-dimer as a robust predictor of adverse outcomes, including respiratory failure and death [
6,
8]. While the mechanistic underpinnings of D-dimer elevation in COVID-19 are multifactorial—ranging from microvascular endothelial injury to immunothrombosis—there is still scope for refined subgroup analysis. Many of the existing data focus primarily on vascular thrombotic events, whereas fewer studies extend their attention to the pathological correlates in the lungs, heart, kidneys, and liver that accompany these high D-dimer states [
4,
9].
Autopsy and surgical pathology studies highlight that severe COVID-19 frequently features pulmonary microthrombi, diffuse alveolar damage, and inflammatory cell infiltrates [
9,
10]. Cardiac specimens often demonstrate myocardial fibrosis or even microinfarcts, while kidneys can exhibit acute tubular necrosis or microangiopathy [
9,
11]. Hepatic findings vary from mild fatty changes to severe congestion or necrosis [
12]. These pathologies likely stem from a combination of direct viral invasion, cytokine storm, and hypercoagulability [
13,
14]. Unraveling how such findings are distributed across different degrees of D-dimer elevation could deepen the clinical understanding of disease trajectories.
Hyperinflammation and hypercoagulability in COVID-19 appear to be tightly interwoven, creating a positive feedback loop capable of damaging multiple organ systems [
15,
16]. Mechanistically, SARS-CoV-2 elicits a systemic inflammatory cascade—often termed the “cytokine storm”—and triggers endothelial cell activation [
17]. This endothelial dysfunction can expose the subendothelial collagen layer, amplifying the coagulation cascade [
18]. Concurrently, sustained inflammation can worsen local tissue injury, favoring microthrombi formation and further organ compromise [
19,
20]. Detailed autopsy-driven evidence clarifies the morphological features (e.g., fibrin deposits, necrosis) that coincide with biomarker surges, such as D-dimer and CRP.
COVID-19-associated coagulopathy, typified by sharp rises in D-dimer, has been repeatedly linked to thrombotic complications; nevertheless, the extent to which progressively higher D-dimer strata map onto concrete, organ-specific histopathologies remains underexplored. We therefore aimed to test the hypothesis that increasing admission D-dimer levels (<500 ng/mL, 500–2000 ng/mL, and ≥2000 ng/mL) are associated with a stepwise rise in the prevalence and severity of lung, cardiac, renal, and hepatic lesions in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design and Setting
This retrospective study took place at a tertiary medical center in Timisoara, Romania, at the Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy. We analyzed 69 patients with confirmed COVID-19 (via RT-PCR) between 2020 and 2023. Data were abstracted retrospectively from a mandatory, prospectively maintained electronic COVID-19 registry used by all wards of the hospital. Clinical data, laboratory values, and pathology reports (autopsies or surgical specimens) were originally documented in the database and paper records. For uniformity, all terms related to organ findings were translated into their English equivalents. The hospital primarily served patients from both urban and rural regions, admitting severe COVID-19 cases. All pathological reports were reviewed by two independent pathologists. Ethical approval was obtained from the institutional review board (no 5058/28.05.2021), and consent requirements were waived due to the study’s retrospective and de-identified nature.
2.2. Inclusion Criteria and Data Extraction
Patients were eligible if they had (1) a confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection; (2) documented D-dimer at hospital admission; (3) available data on key inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, and ESR); and (4) pathologic findings describing at least one organ system (lung, heart, kidney, or liver) either ante-mortem or post-mortem. We excluded cases with incomplete lab data or ambiguous cause of death unrelated to COVID-19. We extracted demographic variables (age, sex), comorbid conditions (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, obesity [BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2], chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, coronary-artery disease, or active malignancy), vital parameters, and final outcomes (ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, and in-hospital mortality). For pathology, we recorded the presence or absence of specific lesions: pulmonary microthrombi, bronchopneumonia, diffuse alveolar damage, myocardial fibrosis, myocardial infarction, renal tubular necrosis, and hepatic steatosis. Additional observations (e.g., hemorrhagic necrosis and vascular congestion) were also noted. All Romanian-language clinical and pathology reports were independently translated into English by two researchers participating in the study.
2.3. D-Dimer Subgroup Classification
Patients were categorized into three D-dimer strata based on admission levels (ng/mL): Group 1: <500 (“normal/low”); Group 2: 500–2000 (“moderately elevated”); and Group 3: ≥2000 (“markedly elevated”). These thresholds coincide with those repeatedly linked to sharp inflection points in mortality, and are endorsed by several consensus guidelines [
7,
14]. Other laboratory values included CRP (mg/L), ESR (mm/h), and fibrinogen (mg/dL). CRP ≥ 50 mg/L, ESR > 40 mm/h, and fibrinogen ≥ 400 mg/dL were considered “elevated” in a broad clinical sense [
20].
We also noted whether patients underwent anticoagulation (prophylactic or therapeutic dose) during hospitalization, as this may influence D-dimer dynamics and overall outcomes. However, due to incomplete records on specific anticoagulant regimens, these data were not included in the comparative statistics, limiting our ability to control for treatment heterogeneity in the final analysis.
D-dimer was measured via a latex-enhanced immunoturbidimetric assay (ACL TOP 700, Instrumentation Laboratory, Bedford, MA, USA) and reported in fibrinogen equivalent units (FEU; reference < 500 ng/mL). C-reactive protein concentrations were quantified via high-sensitivity immunonephelometry on a BN II System analyser (Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany), with a reference range of <5 mg/L. Plasma fibrinogen was measured via the Clauss clot-based assay on the same ACL TOP 700 platform as D-dimer, with 200–400 mg/dL taken as the reference interval. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate was determined within two hours of venepuncture using the fully automated Westergren-based Alifax Roller 20 instrument (Alifax S.p.A., Padua, Italy); values ≤ 20 mm/h were considered normal. All laboratory parameters cited herein were obtained within six hours of hospital admission.
2.4. Statistical Analysis
All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 27 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Continuous data were tested for normality (Shapiro–Wilk test). For normally distributed variables, results are reported as mean ± standard deviation and compared using one-way ANOVA. Kruskal–Wallis tests were used for non-normally distributed variables, reported as the median (interquartile range). Categorical data (e.g., presence or absence of a given pathology) were compared using chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests, as appropriate. We created correlation matrices (Spearman’s or Pearson’s r) to evaluate associations among lab parameters (D-dimer, CRP, ESR, and fibrinogen) and pathology findings. A multivariable logistic model (enter method) included age, sex, obesity, chronic kidney disease, and D-dimer ≥ 2000 ng/mL; only variables with p < 0.10 in univariate screening were retained. Multiple comparisons among the three D-dimer groups included post hoc tests, with p-values < 0.05 indicating significance. All p-values were two-sided.
3. Results
Table 1 provides a broad overview of the 69 patients included in this study, summarizing their demographic backgrounds and key comorbidities without subdividing them by D-dimer level. The average age was around 63 years. Males constitute nearly 60% of the cohort. Hypertension emerged as the most prevalent comorbidity, present in over half of the patients. Around one-fifth of patients had diabetes mellitus, while approximately the same proportion were diagnosed with chronic kidney disease. Twelve of these patients (17.4%) had a history of malignancy. Moreover, pulmonary pathology dominates, with diffuse alveolar damage (43.5%) and bronchopneumonia (40.6%) prevalent. Pulmonary microthrombi appear in 37.7% of cases. Myocardial fibrosis is present in almost half of the cohort, renal tubular necrosis appears in one-third (33.3%) of patients, hepatic steatosis is noted in 27.5%, while recent myocardial infarction is found in 15.9%.
Compared with patients in the lowest D-dimer category (<500 ng/mL), those with intermediate (500–2000 ng/mL) and high (≥2000 ng/mL) D-dimer levels exhibited a progressive increase in the prevalence of most comorbid conditions. While hypertension was similarly common across groups (45.0%, 55.6%, and 54.5%, respectively;
p = 0.64), diabetes mellitus rose from 10.0% to 22.2% and 31.8% (
p = 0.14), and obesity increased from 15.0% to 18.5% and 31.8% (
p = 0.31). Notably, chronic kidney disease showed a statistically significant escalation, affecting 5.0%, 18.5%, and 36.4% of patients in the low, intermediate, and high D-dimer groups, respectively (
p = 0.01). Although the prevalence of coronary-artery disease and COPD also trended upward with higher D-dimer levels, these differences did not reach significance (
p = 0.24 and
p = 0.28). Active malignancy rates remained stable across strata (approximately 15–18%,
p = 0.91). Overall, the mean number of comorbidities per patient increased significantly from 1.3 ± 0.9 in the lowest category to 1.7 ± 1.0 and 2.2 ± 1.1 in the intermediate and highest categories, respectively (
p = 0.006), underscoring a greater comorbidity burden in patients with elevated D-dimer levels (
Table 2).
Table 3 classifies the 69 patients into three D-dimer strata: <500 ng/mL, 500–2000 ng/mL, and ≥2000 ng/mL. Interestingly, the distribution across groups is relatively balanced, though the “moderately elevated” subset (500–2000 ng/mL) is the largest, capturing nearly 40% of the cohort. Just under one-third present with normal/low D-dimer (<500 ng/mL), while about the same proportion display markedly elevated levels (≥2000 ng/mL).
Table 4 illustrates the incidence of various organ pathologies across three D-dimer groups. The frequency of pulmonary microthrombi increases with higher D-dimer levels, with 20.0% (4 out of 20 participants) in Group 1 (<500), 37.0% (10 out of 27 participants) in Group 2 (500–2000), and 54.5% (12 out of 22 participants) in Group 3 (≥2000), showing a statistically significant difference, with a
p-value of 0.02. Similarly, the prevalence of bronchopneumonia also shows a significant increase across the groups: 25.0% (5 out of 20) in Group 1, 37.0% (10 out of 27) in Group 2, and 59.1% (13 out of 22) in Group 3, with a
p-value of 0.04.
Other pathologies, although showing upward trends, did not reach statistical significance. Myocardial fibrosis was observed in 30.0% (6 out of 20) of Group 1, increasing to 48.1% (13 out of 27) in Group 2, and 54.5% (12 out of 22) in Group 3, with a p-value of 0.09. Renal tubular necrosis was reported in 20.0% (4 out of 20) of Group 1, 33.3% (9 out of 27) in Group 2, and 45.5% (10 out of 22) in Group 3, with a p-value of 0.08. Hepatic steatosis increased from 15.0% (3 out of 20) in Group 1 to 29.6% (8 out of 27) in Group 2, and 36.4% (8 out of 22) in Group 3, showing a p-value of 0.13. These findings underscore that an admission D-dimer ≥ 2000 ng/mL is not merely a laboratory anomaly, but a phenotypic marker of diffuse microvascular injury, especially in the lungs, where microthrombi were detected in over half of the patients.
Table 5 evaluates whether inflammatory markers parallel changes in D-dimer. Across the three subgroups, CRP, ESR, and fibrinogen all rise significantly as D-dimer levels escalate (
p < 0.001,
p = 0.002, and
p = 0.001, respectively). The median CRP in Group 1 is 24.5 mg/L, consistent with a moderate inflammatory state, whereas Group 3’s median approaches 92.4 mg/L, indicative of marked systemic inflammation. Similarly, ESR exhibits a near-doubling from Group 1 (median 25 mm/h) to Group 3 (58 mm/h), and mean fibrinogen climbs from 348 mg/dL to 478 mg/dL.
Table 6 confirms that ascending D-dimer levels tie closely to poorer clinical outcomes in COVID-19. ICU admission rates climb markedly from 20% in Group 1 to 54.5% in Group 3 (
p = 0.01). While mechanical ventilation shares a similar upward trend (10% → 36.4%), the
p-value is marginally above significance (
p = 0.06). Mortality showed a dramatic rise from 5% in the low D-dimer group to over one-third (36.4%) in the ≥2000 ng/mL group (
p = 0.01). Furthermore, the median length of stay (LOS) increases by nearly a week between Groups 1 and 3 (9 vs. 15 days).
The analysis showed higher incidences of all listed conditions in the CKD present group compared to the CKD absent group. Specifically, pulmonary microthrombi were observed in 64.3% (9 out of 14) of patients with CKD, significantly higher than the 30.9% (17 out of 55) seen in those without CKD, with a
p-value of 0.01. Additionally, bronchopneumonia and myocardial fibrosis were both reported in 71.4% (10 out of 14) of CKD patients, compared to 32.7% (18 out of 55) and 38.2% (21 out of 55), respectively, in non-CKD patients, with
p-values of 0.003 and 0.02, respectively. Renal tubular necrosis was particularly high in the CKD group at 78.6% (11 out of 14), compared to only 21.8% (12 out of 55) in those without CKD, with a highly significant
p-value of less than 0.001. Markedly elevated D-dimer levels (≥2000) were also significantly more frequent in CKD patients, 64.3% (9 out of 14) versus 23.6% (13 out of 55), with a
p-value of 0.002. Finally, mortality was markedly higher in the CKD group, affecting 57.1% (8 out of 14) compared to 9.1% (5 out of 55), with a
p-value of less than 0.001 (
Table 7).
The data indicated higher rates of each condition among patients with diabetes. In the group with diabetes, 66.7% (10 out of 15) had markedly elevated D-dimer levels (≥2000 ng/mL), significantly more than the 22.2% (12 out of 54) observed in those without diabetes, with a
p-value of 0.001. Pulmonary microthrombi were present in 73.3% (11 out of 15) of patients with diabetes, compared to only 27.8% (15 out of 54) of those without diabetes, with a
p-value of 0.002. Renal tubular necrosis was reported in 60.0% (9 out of 15) of diabetic patients versus 25.9% (14 out of 54) of non-diabetic patients, with a
p-value of 0.02. Myocardial fibrosis was noted in 66.7% (10 out of 15) of the diabetes group compared to 38.9% (21 out of 54) in the non-diabetes group, with a
p-value of 0.06, suggesting a trend towards significance but not reaching the statistical threshold. Furthermore, 73.3% (11 out of 15) of diabetic patients had two or more organ pathologies, significantly higher than 38.9% (21 out of 54) in those without diabetes, with a
p-value of 0.01. Lastly, in-hospital mortality was notably higher among diabetic patients at 46.7% (7 out of 15), compared to 9.3% (5 out of 54) in those without diabetes, with a
p-value of less than 0.001 (
Table 8).
The cross-tabulation confirms a clear, dose–response relationship between admission D-dimer and multimorbidity burden. Among patients with low D-dimer (<500 ng/mL), the great majority (70%) had no more than one chronic condition, and their mean comorbidity count was 1.3 ± 0.9. In the intermediate stratum (500–2000 ng/mL), this balance inverted: almost three-fifths (59.3%) harbored two or more comorbidities, raising the average to 1.7 ± 1.0. The gradient steepened further in the ≥2000 ng/mL group, where 68.2% carried at least two underlying diseases and the mean climbed to 2.2 ± 1.1 (
Table 9).
Notably, D-dimer showed significant positive correlations with all other variables: CRP (ρ = 0.61), ESR (ρ = 0.58), fibrinogen (ρ = 0.49), pulmonary microthrombi (ρ = 0.46), and mortality (ρ = 0.53), indicating statistical significance. Further, CRP also exhibited significant positive correlations with ESR (ρ = 0.55), fibrinogen (ρ = 0.42), pulmonary microthrombi (ρ = 0.40), and mortality (ρ = 0.38). ESR correlated with fibrinogen (ρ = 0.39), pulmonary microthrombi (ρ = 0.37), and mortality (ρ = 0.30). Fibrinogen showed weaker, yet significant correlations with pulmonary microthrombi (ρ = 0.28) and mortality (ρ = 0.26), but these were not significant. Pulmonary microthrombi and mortality also correlated significantly with a ρ value of 0.35, as presented in
Table 10 and
Figure 1.
Table 11 summarizes a multivariable logistic regression examining independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. D-dimer ≥ 2000 ng/mL is the strongest indicator, conferring an odds ratio (OR) of 4.27 (95% CI: 1.81–8.55,
p = 0.002). CRP ≥ 50 mg/L also emerges as independently predictive (OR 2.13,
p = 0.046), reinforcing the significance of systemic inflammation. By contrast, age shows a modest but non-significant trend (OR 1.03,
p = 0.22). CKD nearly doubles the odds of mortality (OR 1.85), but the wide confidence interval crosses unity (0.85–3.62), limiting statistical certainty (
p = 0.09), as presented in
Figure 2.