Next Article in Journal
Editorial for “Latest Advances in Diagnosis and Management of Skin Cancer”
Previous Article in Journal
Deep Learning-Assisted Diagnostic System: Implant Brand Detection Using Improved IB-YOLOv10 in Periapical Radiographs
Previous Article in Special Issue
Expanding Application of Optical Coherence Tomography Beyond the Clinic: A Narrative Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evaluation of Retinal and Optic Nerve Parameters in Recovered COVID-19 Patients: Potential Neurodegenerative Impact on the Ganglion Cell Layer

1
Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, 53100 Rize, Turkey
2
Department of Ophthalmology, Trabzon Imperial Hospital, 61200 Trabzon, Turkey
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2025, 15(10), 1195; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15101195
Submission received: 22 March 2025 / Revised: 30 April 2025 / Accepted: 6 May 2025 / Published: 9 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Optical Coherence Tomography in Diagnosis of Ophthalmology Disease)

Abstract

:
Background/Objectives: This study aimed to analyze optic nerve parameters, retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT), ganglion cell layer thickness (GCLT), and subfoveal choroidal thickness (ChT) in patients who have recovered from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Methods: This comparative study included 78 recovered COVID-19 patients (16 men, 62 women) and 56 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (18 men, 38 women). COVID-19 was confirmed in all patients, either through the detection of viral RNA in nasopharyngeal swabs via reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction or by serological testing for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) was used to assess optic nerve parameters, RNFLT, GCLT, and ChT. Results: The mean age was 35.0 ± 8.3 years in the COVID-19 group and 31.5 ± 8.3 years in the control group, with no statistically significant differences in age or sex distribution between groups (p = 0.41 and p = 0.16, respectively). Optic nerve parameters and RNFLT (overall and across the four peripapillary quadrants) did not differ significantly between the COVID-19 and control groups. However, the mean ganglion cell–inner plexiform layer (GC-IPL) thickness was significantly reduced in all quadrants in the COVID-19 group compared to the controls. No significant difference was observed in mean subfoveal ChT between groups. Conclusions: A significant reduction in ganglion GCLT was observed in recovered COVID-19 patients compared to healthy controls, suggesting a potential neurodegenerative effect of the disease on the optic nerve.

1. Introduction

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has emerged as one of the most significant global health crises in recent history [1,2]. Initially recognized for its respiratory manifestations, particularly acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), COVID-19 is now understood to be a multisystem disease affecting the cardiovascular, neurological, renal, and ophthalmic systems [3]. The virus has been implicated in widespread endothelial dysfunction, hypercoagulability, and an exaggerated inflammatory response, all of which may contribute to organ damage beyond the lungs [4].
Among its ophthalmic manifestations, ocular surface disorders, including conjunctivitis, are the most frequently reported, with an incidence of approximately 10% [5]. However, increasing evidence suggests that SARS-CoV-2 may also affect deeper ocular structures, including the retina and optic nerve [6,7]. Several case reports and small-scale studies have documented retinal vascular abnormalities, including cotton wool spots, focal hyperreflective dots in the ganglion cell layer, microhemorrhages, and dilated veins, resembling retinal findings observed in systemic vascular diseases such as hypertension and diabetes mellitus [8,9]. Additionally, optic neuritis and other neuro-ophthalmic complications, such as acute macular neuroretinopathy, papillophlebitis and retinitis, have been reported in patients recovering from COVID-19, raising concerns about potential long-term visual impairment [10,11,12,13]. Despite these emerging reports, comprehensive data on the chronic effects of COVID-19 on retinal and optic nerve structures remain limited.
The pathophysiological basis for SARS-CoV-2-related neuro-ophthalmic involvement is not yet fully understood but may be linked to the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor, which serves as the primary entry point for the virus into host cells. The ACE2 receptor has been identified in various ocular tissues, including the retina, choroid, and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), suggesting that these structures may be directly susceptible to viral invasion [14]. Beyond direct viral effects, secondary mechanisms such as immune-mediated inflammation, hypercoagulability, and microvascular dysfunction may further contribute to optic nerve and retinal damage [15]. Notably, the pro-inflammatory cytokine storm associated with severe COVID-19 has been implicated in retinal vascular occlusions, raising concerns about possible ischemic complications in the posterior segment of the eye [16].
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) has emerged as a valuable, non-invasive imaging tool for detecting structural alterations in the retina and optic nerve. High-resolution spectral-domain OCT (SD-OCT) allows for precise, reproducible measurements of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT), ganglion cell layer thickness (GCLT), and choroidal thickness (ChT), which are critical parameters in evaluating neurodegenerative and vascular retinal conditions. In systemic diseases, such as multiple sclerosis, diabetes, and hypertension, changes in these retinal layers have been associated with disease progression and prognosis [17], suggesting that OCT findings in post-COVID-19 patients could serve as a potential biomarker for long-term neuro-ophthalmic involvement.
Given the increasing reports of retinal and optic nerve abnormalities in recovered COVID-19 patients, this study aimed to evaluate the structural impact of the disease on the posterior segment of the eye. Using SD-OCT, we assessed optic nerve parameters, RNFLT, GCLT, and ChT in individuals who had recovered from COVID-19 and compared them with age-matched healthy controls. By identifying potential post-COVID-19 retinal and optic nerve alterations, our findings may contribute to understanding the neuro-ophthalmic sequelae of the disease and provide insights into long-term monitoring strategies for affected individuals.

2. Materials and Methods

This comparative, cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate ocular parameters in healthcare workers who had recovered from COVID-19, compared to age- and sex-matched healthy controls. The study adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and received approval from the Kanuni Training and Research Hospital Ethics Committee (Date: 14 March 2021, No.: 23618724). Informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to their inclusion.
This study enrolled 78 healthcare workers (16 men and 62 women) who had recovered from COVID-19 and 56 healthy individuals (18 men and 38 women) as controls. COVID-19 diagnosis was confirmed through reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing of nasopharyngeal swabs or serological detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Participants in the recovered group had been diagnosed with COVID-19 approximately six months (±2 weeks) prior to the ophthalmic assessments.
The inclusion criteria for both groups were as follows: aged between 18 and 65 years, no history of systemic diseases such as diabetes mellitus or hypertension, and no prior ocular surgeries or trauma. The exclusion criteria encompassed the following: the presence of ocular conditions like glaucoma, cataracts, or retinal diseases, spherical equivalent refractive error exceeding ±3.0 diopters, use of topical ocular medications within the past six months, and pregnancy or lactation.

2.1. Ophthalmic Examination

All participants underwent a comprehensive ophthalmologic evaluation conducted by a single experienced ophthalmologist to ensure consistency. The examination included
  • Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA), assessed using a standard Snellen chart.
  • Intraocular pressure (IOP), measured with a Goldmann applanation tonometer.
  • Anterior Segment Examination, performed using slit-lamp biomicroscopy to evaluate the cornea, anterior chamber, iris, and lens.
  • Dilated Fundus Examination, conducted with a 90-diopter lens to assess the vitreous, retina, and optic nerve head.

2.2. Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Measurements

Spectral-domain OCT imaging was performed using the Cirrus HD-OCT system (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA, USA). Standardized imaging protocols were employed to ensure measurement accuracy and reproducibility. Scans were acquired between 9:00 AM and 12:00 PM to minimize diurnal variations in choroidal thickness. All measurements were conducted by the same experienced examiner to reduce interobserver variability. Only scans with a signal strength of 7 or higher were included; scans with segmentation errors or motion artifacts were excluded. For analysis, the right eye of each participant was selected. If the right eye did not meet the inclusion criteria due to inadequate image quality or segmentation errors, the left eye was used instead.
The following parameters were assessed:
  • Peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT), measured using the Optic Disc Cube 200 × 200 protocol, which provides average thickness and sectoral measurements (temporal, superior, nasal, and inferior quadrants).
  • Optic nerve head (ONH) parameters, evaluated using the same protocol, including rim area, disc area, average cup-to-disc ratio, and vertical cup-to-disc ratio.
  • Ganglion cell–inner plexiform layer (GC-IPL) thickness, assessed with the Macular Cube 512 × 128 protocol, providing average and sectoral thicknesses.
Subfoveal choroidal thickness (ChT), measured manually from the outer border of the retinal pigment epithelium to the sclerochoroidal interface using the caliper tool in the OCT software (Zeiss Cirrus Review Software (Carl Zeiss Meditec, version 8.1.0.117)) by two independent masked graders (Figure 1). The average of their values was used for analysis. In cases of disagreement greater than 10%, a third senior grader was consulted.

2.3. Statistical Analyses

Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (version 23, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Continuous variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD), while categorical variables are expressed as frequencies and percentages. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to assess the normality of data distribution. Differences in age and sex between the COVID-19 and control groups were analyzed using the independent samples t-test and Chi-square (χ2) test, respectively. For comparisons of normally distributed continuous variables between the two groups, the independent samples t-test was applied. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

This study enrolled 78 healthcare workers who had recovered from COVID-19 and 56 age- and sex-matched healthy control subjects. The mean age was 35.0 ± 8.3 years in the COVID-19 group and 31.5 ± 8.3 years in the control group, with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.41). The gender distribution was also comparable between the groups (p = 0.16). All participants had a BCVA of 20/20, and IOP measurements were within normal limits.

3.1. Optic Nerve Head (ONH) Parameters and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness (RNFLT)

Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) assessments revealed no significant differences between the COVID-19 and control groups in terms of ONH parameters, including rim area, disc area, average cup-to-disc ratio, and vertical cup-to-disc ratio (p > 0.05 for all comparisons) (Table 1).
Similarly, the average peripapillary RNFLT, as well as quadrant-specific measurements (superior, inferior, nasal, and temporal), did not differ significantly between the two groups (p > 0.05) (Table 2). These findings suggest that COVID-19 infection does not have a measurable impact on ONH morphology or RNFL thickness in recovered individuals.

3.2. Ganglion Cell–Inner Plexiform Layer (GC-IPL) Thickness

In contrast, the mean GC-IPL thickness was significantly reduced in the COVID-19 group compared to the controls across all measured sectors (p < 0.05). The average GC-IPL thickness was 78.38 ± 16.21 µm in recovered COVID-19 patients, whereas it was 84.61 ± 8.34 µm in the control group (p = 0.012). Additionally, the minimum GC-IPL thickness was notably lower in the COVID-19 group (p = 0.014). These results indicate a potential impact of COVID-19 on the inner retinal layers, particularly affecting the ganglion cell complex (Table 3).

3.3. Choroidal Thickness (ChT)

The mean subfoveal ChT was 279.4 ± 20.5 µm in the COVID-19 group and 277.3 ± 13.5 µm in the control group. The difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.47), indicating that COVID-19 may not have a measurable effect on the choroidal structure in recovered patients.

4. Discussion

Our study demonstrated that while optic nerve head (ONH) parameters and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT) remained unaffected in recovered COVID-19 patients, significant reductions were observed in ganglion cell–inner plexiform layer (GC-IPL) thickness across all measured sectors. This suggests a potential impact of COVID-19 on the inner retinal layers. In contrast, subfoveal ChT did not show any significant differences between groups, indicating that choroidal structure may be preserved following COVID-19 infection.
The potential retinal involvement of SARS-CoV-2 can be explained by several mechanisms. One proposed pathway is the infiltration of infected leukocytes across the blood–retina barrier (BRB), facilitating viral entry into retinal tissues [18]. Studies have shown that SARS-CoV-2 can infect and replicate in retinal cells, such as photoreceptors and retinal ganglion cells, further supporting the virus’s potential to directly affect retinal tissues [19]. Another mechanism involves angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), the primary receptor through which the virus induces pathological changes. ACE2 expression is significantly elevated in ocular tissues, including the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and choroid [20]. Furthermore, SARS-CoV-2 may directly target the ACE2 receptors of vascular pericytes, contributing to the involvement of the ocular vascular system [21]. Additionally, CD147, a transmembrane glycoprotein known to serve as an alternative receptor for SARS-CoV-2, has been detected at moderate to high levels in retinal and BRB cells [22].
OCT is a non-invasive imaging modality that quantitatively assesses retinal and ganglion cell layers. In the medical literature, it is well-recognized as a valuable tool for diagnosing retinal changes associated with systemic conditions such as diabetes and hypertension, as well as for monitoring disease progression and prognosis. Studies have demonstrated that retinal layer thinning detected via OCT correlates with axonal loss and neurodegeneration in various neurological disorders, where RNFL thinning serves as a marker for neurodegeneration and is associated with increased disability and reduced quality of life [23,24]. Similarly, in post-COVID-19 patients, OCT may serve as a crucial tool for detecting subtle retinal alterations with potential prognostic significance.
Findings regarding RNFLT in post-COVID-19 patients have been inconsistent. The current literature includes numerous studies reporting that the average RNFLT of the optic disc is lower in COVID-19 patients compared to controls [25,26,27]. In a study comparing RNFLT between recovered COVID-19 patients and healthy controls, no significant differences were observed in any quadrant except for sectoral thinning in the nasal quadrant [28]. Conversely, a case series of COVID-19 patients reported increased RNFLT 4 weeks after the diagnosis in seven out of eight eyes, except for one case with pre-existing glaucoma, which showed decreased RNFLT [29]. In another study, post-COVID-19 patients showed statistically significant increases in the global RNFLT [30]. The authors attributed the increased RNFLT to optic nerve inflammation, tissue hypoxia induced by pneumonia, or the effects of COVID-19 treatment. In another study, researchers investigated short-term (1 month) and long-term (12 month) retinal thicknesses, and they observed that the thinning of retinal thickness in the inner and outer rings was temporary, and no difference was obtained at the 12-month follow-up [31]. Ozmen et al. found that the mean and fragmented RNFL and GC-IPL thicknesses measured by OCT were not statistically different in patients who had a moderate disease course and recovered from COVID-19 infection [32]. Similarly, in our study, RNFLT did not differ significantly between the COVID-19 and control groups. We believe that variations in RNFLT measurements may be attributed to the differences in disease severity, treatment protocols, and the timing of OCT evaluations post-infection. The existing literature suggests that inflammation-induced edema and thickening occur in the early phase, followed by thinning and, ultimately, a return to baseline over the long term. Longitudinal studies with extended follow-up will be essential in further elucidating this progression.
COVID-19 can cause microvascular dysfunction and hypercoagulability, leading to reduced blood flow to the retina [33]. This ischemic damage may contribute to GC-IPL thinning, similar to non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy or diabetic retinopathy. COVID-19 triggers a hyperinflammatory response (cytokine storm) that can affect the central nervous system, including the retina [34]. The release of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, TNF-α) may contribute to ganglion cell apoptosis and retinal neurodegeneration. Previous research suggests that GC-IPL thinning may precede axonal loss and that retinal neurodegeneration may occur before vascular alterations [35,36]. Our study demonstrated a significant reduction in GC-IPL thickness across all quadrants in the COVID-19 group. Similarly, Dag Seker et al. reported the thinning of GC-IPL and inner retinal layers in COVID-19 patients, particularly in subjects with headaches [37]. This finding aligns with the neuroinvasive potential of SARS-CoV-2, as previously reported in animal models [38], and neurological complications [39] associated with COVID-19.
Although the reduction in GC-IPL thickness observed in our study was statistically significant, the relative decrease was modest—approximately 7.4%—and falls within the range of normal inter-individual variability reported in healthy populations [40]. While such thinning has been associated with neurodegenerative diseases like glaucoma and Alzheimer’s [41], all participants in our study maintained normal visual acuity and intraocular pressure, suggesting no immediate functional impairment. The clinical relevance of this mild thinning remains uncertain. Additionally, the long-term trajectory of GC-IPL changes following COVID-19 is still under investigation. Some studies suggest that retinal alterations may be transient and resolved within months, while others indicate possible persistence [31,42]. Therefore, further longitudinal studies are necessary to determine whether this thinning represents reversible retinal stress or is an early indicator of lasting neuroretinal damage.
COVID-19 may affect choroidal thickness through multiple mechanisms, primarily driven by the systemic inflammatory response, vascular dysfunction, and microvascular damage associated with the disease. SARS-CoV-2 infection induces a cytokine storm, characterized by elevated levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and interleukin-1β (IL-1β), which can disrupt the blood–retinal barrier and lead to increased vascular permeability in the choroid. Additionally, endothelial dysfunction caused by direct viral invasion via angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors, which are highly expressed in choroidal vasculature, may contribute to altered choroidal perfusion and structural changes [43]. Studies using OCT have reported both increased and decreased ChT in post-COVID-19 patients. Increased ChT may result from inflammatorily induced choroidal vascular dilation and leakage, whereas thinning could reflect ischemic damage and hypoperfusion secondary to endothelial dysfunction and thrombotic microangiopathy. Some research indicates an increase in ChT among individuals recovering from COVID-19. For instance, in one study, central foveal choroidal thicknesses were found to be higher in COVID-19 patients compared to healthy controls [44]. In another study, ChT was found to be increased during the active phase of COVID-19; however, no significant difference was observed between recovered patients and the control group during the post-recovery period [45]. Conversely, Erdem et al. [46] observed a decrease in the thickness of the choroidal tissue in all measured areas in recovered COVID-19 patients. In another study, a decrease in CT during the early post-infectious period was reported, and this choroidopathy was recovered from during the follow-up period [47]. In our study, we were not able to find a measurable effect of COVID-19 on the choroidal structure in recovered patients. Although our study did not demonstrate a significant difference in subfoveal ChT, the mixed findings in the literature suggest that choroidal alterations may occur in some individuals, possibly reflecting systemic vascular and inflammatory responses to COVID-19. We believe that these discrepancies may stem from differences in study design, patient populations, timing of measurements post-infection, individual vascular reactivity, and the severity of the disease.
The main limitations of this study include a relatively small sample size, its single-center cross-sectional design, which precludes longitudinal assessment of retinal changes, and the absence of a long-term follow-up. Additionally, baseline ophthalmological evaluations were unavailable, making it difficult to determine whether the observed retinal alterations predated the infection.
Understanding the ocular effects of COVID-19 is crucial, as retinal alterations may indicate broader neurovascular dysfunction. Our findings highlight the need for comprehensive ophthalmic evaluations in recovered patients and suggest that follow-up OCT assessments should be considered for persistent visual disturbances due to the risk of long-term neuro-ophthalmic sequelae. Future research should prioritize large-scale longitudinal studies to track retinal changes over time and explore therapeutic strategies, such as neuroprotective or anti-inflammatory treatments, to mitigate retinal damage. Additionally, investigating correlations between retinal findings and systemic inflammatory markers could provide further insight into the underlying pathophysiology.
In conclusion, this study compared RNFL and ganglion cell layer thickness between recovered COVID-19 patients and healthy controls. While no significant differences were found in RNFLT, a significant reduction in GCL-IPL thickness was observed, suggesting the potential early retinal neurodegenerative effects of COVID-19. Further longitudinal studies with larger cohorts are warranted to clarify the long-term impact of SARS-CoV-2 on retinal health. These findings highlight the need for continued ophthalmic monitoring in post-COVID-19 patients, as well as further research to determine the long-term impact of SARS-CoV-2 on retinal and neuro-ophthalmic health.

Author Contributions

Methodology, F.U., M.B.K., H.F. and M.K.; software, H.F.; validation, M.K.; formal analysis, F.U.; investigation, F.U., M.B.K., H.F. and M.K.; writing—original draft, M.B.K. and F.U.; writing—review and editing, F.U., M.B.K., H.F. and M.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors thank the Recep Tayyip Erdogan University Development Foundation, which provided funding for the open access publishing of this study (grant number: 02025003024380).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Kanuni Training and Research Hospital Ethics Committee (Date: 14 March 2021, No.: 23618724).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in this study.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, and further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Zhu, N.; Zhang, D.; Wang, W.; Li, X.; Yang, B.; Song, J.; Zhao, X.; Huang, B.; Shi, W.; Lu, R.; et al. A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 727–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Guan, W.J.; Ni, Z.Y.; Hu, Y.; Liang, W.H.; Ou, C.Q.; He, J.X.; Liu, L.; Shan, H.; Lei, C.L.; Hui, D.S.C.; et al. Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 1708–1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Huang, C.; Wang, Y.; Li, X.; Ren, L.; Zhao, J.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Fan, G.; Xu, J.; Gu, X.; et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 2020, 395, 497–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Iba, T.; Connors, J.M.; Levy, J.H. The coagulopathy, endotheliopathy, and vasculitis of COVID-19. Inflamm. Res. 2020, 69, 1181–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Wu, P.; Duan, F.; Luo, C.; Liu, Q.; Qu, X.; Liang, L.; Wu, K. Characteristics of Ocular Findings of Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Hubei Province, China. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020, 138, 575–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Marinho, P.M.; Marcos, A.A.A.; Romano, A.C.; Nascimento, H.; Belfort, R., Jr. Retinal findings in patients with COVID-19. Lancet 2020, 395, 1610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Riotto, E.; Mégevand, V.; Mégevand, A.; Marti, C.; Pugin, J.; Stangos, A.N.; Marconi Archinto, L.; Sunaric Mégevand, G. Retinal Manifestations in Patients with COVID-19: A Prospective Cohort Study. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 1828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Invernizzi, A.; Torre, A.; Parrulli, S.; Zicarelli, F.; Schiuma, M.; Colombo, V.; Giacomelli, A.; Cigada, M.; Milazzo, L.; Ridolfo, A.; et al. Retinal findings in patients with COVID-19: Results from the SERPICO-19 study. eClinicalMedicine 2020, 27, 100550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. D’Alessandro, E.; Kawasaki, A.; Eandi, C.M. Pathogenesis of Vascular Retinal Manifestations in COVID-19 Patients: A Review. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 2710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gold, D.M.; Galetta, S.L. Neuro-ophthalmologic complications of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Neurosci. Lett. 2021, 742, 135531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. David, J.A.; Fivgas, G.D. Acute macular neuroretinopathy associated with COVID-19 infection. Am. J. Ophthalmol. Case Rep. 2021, 24, 101232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Insausti-García, A.; Reche-Sainz, J.A.; Ruiz-Arranz, C.; López Vázquez, Á.; Ferro-Osuna, M. Papillophlebitis in a COVID-19 patient: Inflammation and hypercoagulable state. Eur. J. Ophthalmol. 2022, 32, NP168–NP172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Benito-Pascual, B.; Gegúndez, J.A.; Díaz-Valle, D.; Arriola-Villalobos, P.; Carreño, E.; Culebras, E.; Rodríguez-Avial, I.; Benitez-Del-Castillo, J.M. Panuveitis and Optic Neuritis as a Possible Initial Presentation of the Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Ocul. Immunol. Inflamm. 2020, 28, 922–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ahmad Mulyadi Lai, H.I.; Chou, S.-J.; Chien, Y.; Tsai, P.-H.; Chien, C.-S.; Hsu, C.-C.; Jheng, Y.-C.; Wang, M.-L.; Chiou, S.-H.; Chou, Y.-B.; et al. Expression of Endogenous Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 in Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Retinal Organoids. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zhao, Y.; Tang, Y.; Wang, Q.Y.; Li, J. Ocular neuroinflammatory response secondary to SARS-CoV-2 infection-a review. Front. Immunol. 2025, 16, 1515768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lin, T.P.H.; Ko, C.-N.; Zheng, K.; Lai, K.H.W.; Wong, R.L.M.; Lee, A.; Zhang, S.; Huang, S.S.; Wan, K.H.; Lam, D.S.C. COVID-19: Update on Its Ocular Involvements, and Complications from Its Treatments and Vaccinations. Asia-Pac. J. Ophthalmol. 2021, 10, 521–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Alonso, R.; Gonzalez-Moron, D.; Garcea, O. Optical coherence tomography as a biomarker of neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis: A review. Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord. 2018, 22, 77–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Monu, M.; Ahmad, F.; Olson, R.M.; Balendiran, V.; Singh, P.K. SARS-CoV-2 infects cells lining the blood-retinal barrier and induces a hyperinflammatory immune response in the retina via systemic exposure. PLoS Pathog. 2024, 20, e1012156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Menuchin-Lasowski, Y.; Schreiber, A.; Lecanda, A.; Mecate-Zambrano, A.; Brunotte, L.; Psathaki, O.E.; Ludwig, S.; Rauen, T.; Schöler, H.R. SARS-CoV-2 infects and replicates in photoreceptor and retinal ganglion cells of human retinal organoids. Stem Cell Rep. 2022, 17, 789–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ashander, L.M.; Lumsden, A.L.; Ma, Y.; Tan, A.C.R.; Appukuttan, B.; Daniel, S.; Michael, M.Z.; Smith, J.R. Brief research report: Transcriptional blockade of angiotensin converting enzyme 2 modelled in human retinal pigment epithelial cells. Front. Drug Discov. 2024, 4, 1416728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. McQuaid, C.; Montagne, A. SARS-CoV-2 and vascular dysfunction: A growing role for pericytes. Cardiovasc. Res. 2022, 119, 2591–2593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Raony, Í.; Saggioro de Figueiredo, C. Retinal outcomes of COVID-19: Possible role of CD147 and cytokine storm in infected patients with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2020, 165, 108280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Garcia-Martin, E.; Ara, J.R.; Martin, J.; Almarcegui, C.; Dolz, I.; Vilades, E.; Gil-Arribas, L.; Fernandez, F.J.; Polo, V.; Larrosa, J.M.; et al. Retinal and Optic Nerve Degeneration in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Followed up for 5 Years. Ophthalmology 2017, 124, 688–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, D.; Zhang, L.; Li, Z.; Zhang, X.; Wu, Y.; Yang, H.; Min, B.; Zhang, X.; Ma, D.; Lu, Y. Thinner changes of the retinal nerve fiber layer in patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. BMC Neurol. 2015, 15, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kal, M.; Brzdek, M.; Karska-Basta, I.; Rzymski, P.; Pinna, A.; Mackiewicz, J.; Odrobina, D.; Winiarczyk, M.; Zarebska-Michaluk, D. Changes in macular ganglion cell and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness during recovery from infection with the B.1.1.7 variant of SARS-CoV-2 in previously hospitalized patients with COVID-19 bilateral pneumonia. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. Off. J. Pol. Physiol. Soc. 2024, 75, 489–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gedik, B.; Yuksel, O.; Kazim Erol, M.; Duman, F.; Dogan, B.; Suren, E.; Yavuz, S. Evaluation of the retina, choroid and optic disc vascular structures in individuals with a history of COVID-19. J. Francais D Ophtalmol. 2024, 47, 104014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sumer, F.; Subasi, S. Effects of COVID-19 on Retinal and Choroidal Thickness by Optical Coherence Tomography. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2023, 32, 569–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Abrishami, M.; Hassanpour, K.; Hosseini, S.; Shoeibi, N.; Ansari-Astaneh, M.R.; Emamverdian, Z.; Gharib, B.; Amini, N.; Abrishami, M. Peripapillary Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness and Optic Nerve Head Parameters in Patients Recovered from COVID-19: A Longitudinal Study. J. Ophthalmol. 2022, 2022, 4643973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Burgos-Blasco, B.; Güemes-Villahoz, N.; Donate-Lopez, J.; Vidal-Villegas, B.; García-Feijóo, J. Optic nerve analysis in COVID-19 patients. J. Med. Virol. 2021, 93, 190–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Burgos-Blasco, B.; Güemes-Villahoz, N.; Vidal-Villegas, B.; Martinez-de-la-Casa, J.M.; Donate-Lopez, J.; Martín-Sánchez, F.J.; González-Armengol, J.J.; Porta-Etessam, J.; Martin, J.L.R.; Garcia-Feijoo, J. Optic nerve and macular optical coherence tomography in recovered COVID-19 patients. Eur. J. Ophthalmol. 2022, 32, 628–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dağ Şeker, E.; Timur, İ.E.E. Assessment of early and long-COVID related retinal neurodegeneration with optical coherence tomography. Int. Ophthalmol. 2023, 43, 2073–2081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ozmen, S.; Cakir, B.; Okan, H.D.; Aksoy, N.O.; Guclu, E. The effect of COVID-19 infection on retinal nerve fiber layer and ganglion cell complex layer thicknesses. Exp. Biomed. Res. 2021, 4, 175–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Meagan, S.; Saadeh-Jackson, S.; Kim, L.A.; Tripathy, K.; Randolph, J.; Ichlangod, A.M. Retinal Manifestations of COVID-19. 2025. Available online: https://eyewiki.org/Retinal_Manifestations_of_COVID-19 (accessed on 15 March 2025).
  34. Li, J.; Mao, N.; Wang, Y.; Deng, S.; Chen, K. Novel insights into the ROCK-JAK-STAT signaling pathway in upper respiratory tract infections and neurodegenerative diseases. Mol. Ther. 2025, 33, 32–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Enright, J.; Van Stavern, G. Application of optical coherence tomography in hereditary, toxic and metabolic optic neuropathies. Ann. Eye Sci. 2020, 5, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sachdeva, M.M. Retinal Neurodegeneration in Diabetes: An Emerging Concept in Diabetic Retinopathy. Curr. Diabetes Rep. 2021, 21, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Dag Seker, E.; Erbahceci Timur, I.E. COVID-19: More than a respiratory virus, an optical coherence tomography study. Int. Ophthalmol. 2021, 41, 3815–3824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, Y.; Detrick, B.; Yu, Z.X.; Zhang, J.; Chesky, L.; Hooks, J.J. The role of apoptosis within the retina of coronavirus-infected mice. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2000, 41, 3011–3018. [Google Scholar]
  39. Li, Y.C.; Bai, W.Z.; Hashikawa, T. The neuroinvasive potential of SARS-CoV2 may play a role in the respiratory failure of COVID-19 patients. J. Med. Virol. 2020, 92, 552–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mwanza, J.C.; Durbin, M.K.; Budenz, D.L.; Girkin, C.A.; Leung, C.K.; Liebmann, J.M.; Peace, J.H.; Werner, J.S.; Wollstein, G. Profile and predictors of normal ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness measured with frequency-domain optical coherence tomography. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011, 52, 7872–7879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sen, S.; Saxena, R.; Tripathi, M.; Vibha, D.; Dhiman, R. Neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease and glaucoma: Overlaps and missing links. Eye 2020, 34, 1546–1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhang, C.; Cheng, S.; Chen, H.; Yang, J.; Chen, Y. New findings on retinal microvascular changes in patients with primary COVID-19 infection: A longitudinal study. Front. Immunol. 2024, 15, 1404785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Casagrande, M.; Fitzek, A.; Püschel, K.; Aleshcheva, G.; Schultheiss, H.P.; Berneking, L.; Spitzer, M.S.; Schultheiss, M. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Human Retinal Biopsies of Deceased COVID-19 Patients. Ocul. Immunol. Inflamm. 2020, 28, 721–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Özer, Ö.; Güçlü, E.S. Optical Coherence Tomography Analysis of Retinal Thickness in COVID-19 Patients. Kocatepe Tıp Derg. 2024, 25, 241–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Gündoğan, M.; Vural, E.; Bayram, N.; Altunel, O.; Gündoğan, F.; Göktaş, S. Change in retinal vessel diameter and choroidal thickness in patients with severe COVID-19: Change in Retinal Parameters in Patients with Severe COVID-19. Photodiagnosis Photodyn. Ther. 2022, 37, 102674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Erdem, S.; Karahan, M.; Ava, S.; Dursun, M.E.; Dursun, B.; Hazar, L.; Bozarslan Senol, B.; Keklikci, U. Evaluation of choroidal thickness in patients who have recovered from COVID-19. Int. Ophthalmol. 2022, 42, 841–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hepokur, M.; Gunes, M.; Durmus, E.; Aykut, V.; Esen, F.; Oguz, H. Long-term follow-up of choroidal changes following COVID-19 infection: Analysis of choroidal thickness and choroidal vascularity index. Can. J. Ophthalmol. 2023, 58, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography image showing the subfoveal choroidal thickness, measured as the vertical distance (dashed arrow) from the outer border of the retinal pigment epithelium to the inner scleral border (sclerochoroidal interface) beneath the fovea.
Figure 1. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography image showing the subfoveal choroidal thickness, measured as the vertical distance (dashed arrow) from the outer border of the retinal pigment epithelium to the inner scleral border (sclerochoroidal interface) beneath the fovea.
Diagnostics 15 01195 g001
Table 1. Comparison of ONH parameters between COVID-19 and healthy control subjects.
Table 1. Comparison of ONH parameters between COVID-19 and healthy control subjects.
Control GroupCOVID-19 Groupp Value
ONH parameters
Rim area (mm2)1.48 ± 0.291.45 ± 0.260.433
Disc area (mm2)1.89 ± 0.271.87 ± 0.320.606
Average C/D ratio0.42 ± 0.151.41 ± 0.180.741
Vertical C/D ratio0.40 ± 0.141.38 ± 0.180.596
ONH = optic nerve head; C/D = cup-to-disc ratio; p < 0.05 indicates statistical significance (independent two-sample t-test).
Table 2. Comparison of RNFL thickness between COVID-19 and healthy control subjects.
Table 2. Comparison of RNFL thickness between COVID-19 and healthy control subjects.
Control GroupCOVID-19 Groupp Value
RNFL Thickness (μm)
Average96.42 ± 10.1993.16 ± 9.890.071
Superior119.66 ± 13.30122.69 ± 17.960.267
Inferior122.28 ± 17.11127.10 ± 15.440.093
Nasal68.07 ± 9.3870.75 ± 13.030.172
Temporal67.08 ± 15.8865.90 ± 11.570.622
RNFL = retinal nerve fiber layer; p < 0.05 indicates statistically significance (independent two-sample t-test).
Table 3. Comparison of GC-IPL thickness between COVID-19 and control subjects.
Table 3. Comparison of GC-IPL thickness between COVID-19 and control subjects.
Control GroupCOVID-19 Groupp Value
GC-IPL Thickness (μm)
Average78.38 ± 16.2184.61 ± 8.340.012
Minimum74.36 ± 18.4181.42 ± 10.310.014
Superior78.50 ± 17.6885.82 ± 8.840.007
Superonasal79.50 ± 16.0086.12 ± 10.130.010
Superotemporal76.83 ± 16.9184.03 ± 8.240.005
Inferior77.00 ± 16.1382.71 ± 8.890.022
Inferonasal79.49 ± 15.5484.73 ± 8.930.030
Inferotemporal78.74 ± 16.7784.53 ± 8.370.023
GC-IPL = ganglion cell–inner plexiform layer; p < 0.05 indicates statistical significance (independent two-sample t-test).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kaim, M.; Kır, M.B.; Uzun, F.; Findik, H. Evaluation of Retinal and Optic Nerve Parameters in Recovered COVID-19 Patients: Potential Neurodegenerative Impact on the Ganglion Cell Layer. Diagnostics 2025, 15, 1195. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15101195

AMA Style

Kaim M, Kır MB, Uzun F, Findik H. Evaluation of Retinal and Optic Nerve Parameters in Recovered COVID-19 Patients: Potential Neurodegenerative Impact on the Ganglion Cell Layer. Diagnostics. 2025; 15(10):1195. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15101195

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kaim, Muhammet, Muhammet Bahattin Kır, Feyzahan Uzun, and Hüseyin Findik. 2025. "Evaluation of Retinal and Optic Nerve Parameters in Recovered COVID-19 Patients: Potential Neurodegenerative Impact on the Ganglion Cell Layer" Diagnostics 15, no. 10: 1195. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15101195

APA Style

Kaim, M., Kır, M. B., Uzun, F., & Findik, H. (2025). Evaluation of Retinal and Optic Nerve Parameters in Recovered COVID-19 Patients: Potential Neurodegenerative Impact on the Ganglion Cell Layer. Diagnostics, 15(10), 1195. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15101195

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop