Next Article in Journal
Comparative CBCT Analysis of Maxillofacial Skeletal Structures in Patients with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate and Non-Cleft Individuals
Next Article in Special Issue
Stroke in Athletes with Atrial Fibrillation: A Narrative Review
Previous Article in Journal
Comparative Investigation of Thromboelastometry and Thrombin Generation for Patients Receiving Direct Oral Anticoagulants or Vitamin K Antagonists
Previous Article in Special Issue
Improvements in Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test Results in Atrial Fibrillation Patients After Radiofrequency Ablation in Kazakhstan
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Remote Management of Heart Failure in Patients with Implantable Devices

Diagnostics 2024, 14(22), 2554; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14222554
by Luca Santini 1, Francesco Adamo 1,*, Karim Mahfouz 1, Carlo Colaiaco 1, Ilaria Finamora 1, Carmine De Lucia 1, Nicola Danisi 1, Stefania Gentile 1, Claudia Sorrentino 1, Maria Grazia Romano 1, Luca Sangiovanni 1, Alessio Nardini 2 and Fabrizio Ammirati 1
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Diagnostics 2024, 14(22), 2554; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14222554
Submission received: 29 September 2024 / Revised: 24 October 2024 / Accepted: 11 November 2024 / Published: 14 November 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis and Management of Arrhythmias)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

I congratulate the Authors for the interesting as comprehensive review that deals with a growing Medical as social problem.

After a discussion of the state of the art of the technology available to date to remotely monitor patients suffering from heart failure, the Authors move on to substantive considerations regarding the change in organisational care logic. This part is undoubtedly the most interesting and thought-provoking for readers.

A small personal note: I would reduce the description of the individual systems as much as possible, also to avoid mixing commercial aspects with purely technological ones, also because of the rapid obsolescence of biomedical technology.

 

 

Author Response

Thank you for your compliments and interest in this review.
With regard to reducing the technical specifications of the algorithms and devices, we have cut as much as possible.

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The authors through their review addressed how multi-parameteric algorithms that are available for cardiac devices whether the ICD and/or the CRT-D can predict a new heart failure event. As the use of AI tools in addition to clinical risk stratification tools especially in heart failure is an emerging field of work and so far many studies were promising. This article highlights this issue without ignoring the limitations of these tools. The way of exploring the existent algorithms was thorough and original. The discussion was informative.

The article summarized the existent algorithms and prior studies objectively, it discussed and showed the differences in different studies not only in terms of the used parameters but also differences in population involved which might affect the outcomes.

More elaboration of how data was extracted (chosen included studies) [e.g. any specific search terms] will be helpful.

 

Presentation of data was clear in terms of tables and figures. 

Author Response

Comment: "More elaboration of how data was extracted (chosen included studies) [e.g. any specific search terms] will be helpful".

We conducted a review of remote monitoring systems for heart failure including clinical trials and real world studies performed. We used following search terms: "remote monitoring", "heart failure", "HeartLogic", "HeartInsight", "Triage-HF", "Cardiomems", "telemedicine". 

A short description of how the data were searched has been added in the text.

Back to TopTop