Next Article in Journal
Risk Assessment of Nasal Cavity Perforation in the Maxilla: A Virtual Implant Placement Study Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography
Previous Article in Journal
Sequential Comparison of Knee Muscle Strength after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction between Hamstring Autograft and Tibialis Anterior Allograft: Propensity Score Matched Pair Analysis
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:

Emphasis on Early Prenatal Diagnosis and Perinatal Outcomes Analysis of Apert Syndrome

Valentin Nicolae Varlas
Dragos Epistatu
3,* and
Roxana Georgiana Varlas
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Filantropia Clinical Hospital, 011132 Bucharest, Romania
Faculty of Dentistry, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 010221 Bucharest, Romania
Department of Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 17-21 Calea Plevnei Street, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
Doctoral School, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2024, 14(14), 1480;
Submission received: 12 May 2024 / Revised: 2 July 2024 / Accepted: 7 July 2024 / Published: 10 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy)


Apert syndrome is an inherited condition with autosomal dominant transmission. It is also known as acrocephalosyndactyly type I, being characterized by a syndrome of craniosynostosis with abnormal head shape, facial anomalies (median hypoplasia), and limb deformities (syndactyly, rhizomelic shortening). The association can suspect the prenatal diagnosis of these types of anomalies. The methodology consisted of revising the literature, by searching the PubMed/Medline database in which 27 articles were selected and analyzed, comprising 32 cases regarding the prenatal diagnosis of Apert syndrome. A series of ultrasound parameters, the anatomopathological abnormalities found, the obstetric results, and the genetic tests were followed. The distribution of imaging results (US, MRI) identified in the analyzed cases was as follows: skull-shaped abnormalities were evident in 96.8% of cases, facial abnormalities (hypertelorism 43.7%, midface hypoplasia 25%, proptosis 21.8%), syndactyly in 87.5%, and cardiovascular abnormalities in 9.3%. The anomalies detected by the ultrasound examination of the fetus were confirmed postnatally by clinical or gross evaluation or imaging. The management of these cases requires an early diagnosis, an evaluation of the severity of the cases, and appropriate parental counseling.

1. Introduction

Apert syndrome is a severe autosomal dominant disorder caused by gene mutations that encode fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) on chromosome 10q [1,2]. Most cases appear de novo because of new mutations, so familial recurrence risk is low. However, more than 98% of all cases are infrequent and associated with advanced paternal age [3,4]. It is defined by early fusion of the cranial sutures (craniosynostosis) and syndactyly in the hands and feet, other associated anomalies having a low rate of occurrence (skeletal, cerebral, skin, internal organs, and oral/maxillofacial region) [1,5,6]. Apert syndrome is a rare condition, accounting for 6 to 15.5 out of 1 million live births, and it represents 4.5% of all cases diagnosed with craniosynostosis syndromes [7,8]. The condition’s prevalence was 2.9 times higher in Asians compared to Hispanics, and the distribution related to the child’s sex (male–female) varied between 0.79 and 0.94 [9].
Establishing an early prenatal diagnosis, especially of severe forms, is very important for counseling parents regarding the poor prognosis of these cases with serious sequelae, and in the case of mild forms of pregnancy monitoring, planning the moment of birth and their neonatal support [7].
The main effects of craniofacial dysmorphism described in Apert syndrome: brachycephalic skull, cranial asymmetry, prominent forehead, hypertelorism and ocular proptosis, exophthalmos, expansion in the temporal region, premature fusion of the coronal suture, widened metopic suture, ventriculomegaly, agenesis/dysgenesis of the corpus callosum, septal leaflets, and olfactory tract. These changes, depending on the degree of damage, can cause respiratory disorders, breastfeeding difficulty, and possible eye injuries at birth [10]. Besides the anomalies that define the syndrome, the association of cardiovascular anomalies (atrial/ventricular septum defects, patent foramen ovale) was 23.5%, cleft palate 23.5%, urinary (hydronephrosis) 5.9%, and central nervous system (agenesis corpus callosum, gyral anomalies) 5.9% [3].
The 2D prenatal ultrasound evaluation of the fetus can reveal several anomalies characteristic of this syndrome by highlighting facial morphology anomalies (facial hypoplasia, orbital, pharyngeal bone anomalies) and syndactyly (fusion of fingers and/or toes). The 3D imaging reconstruction of the fetal skull and limbs (ultrasound, MRI) is complementary, being crucial in establishing the diagnosis of Apert syndrome and differentiating it from other craniosynostosis [11,12]. Carrying out the 4D ultrasound can reveal the vicious positions that affect fetal mobility. In the absence of the fetal anomalies characteristic of this syndrome, it is necessary to establish the genetic diagnosis by karyotype from the amniotic fluid. Establishing the diagnosis and its severity is important in correct parental counseling.
Often, managing cases with less severe evolution requires a multidisciplinary perspective involving a plastic, oral, maxillofacial, and orthodontic surgical approach, recovery of motor function, and psychological counseling. In cases of Apert syndrome, the medical team requires the involvement of a medical geneticist to establish the FGFR2 mutation; the definitive diagnosis can be confirmed only by molecular testing. In cases of fetal death, the pathologist is necessary to confirm the anomalies detected by imaging and to identify other possible anomalies associated that could not be diagnosed prenatally [10].
This article aims to review the reported cases of severe Apert syndrome detected early prenatally during second-trimester ultrasound screening and to highlight the role of parental counseling, therapeutic management, and prognosis. It has been observed that most cases are diagnosed late in the third trimester when managing these situations becomes much more difficult.

2. Literature Review

Apert syndrome (acrocephalosyndactyly type I) is a syndrome with a low incidence rate characterized by the following classic triad: craniosynostosis, flat midface, and bilateral syndactyly [7].
Normal brain development will determine the proper development of the fetal skull. Thus, the process of closing the cranial sutures takes place according to the following model: Initially, the metopic suture is closed at the age of two, and then until adulthood, the other sutures are closed after the completion of craniofacial development. When craniosynostosis is an isolated anomaly, it frequently involves the sagittal suture [13], compared to that which is part of a genetic syndrome (Apert, Pfeiffer, Crouzon, Carpenter, and Saethre–Chotzen), when several sutures are affected. In Apert syndrome, a bicoronal synostosis is observed [14]. The genetic syndromes that associate craniosynostosis determined by FGFR2 gene mutations are autosomal dominant and show a variable degree of overlap of some clinical signs. The exception is Carpenter syndrome, caused by the RAB23 mutation, which is autosomal recessive [15].
Prenatal identification of the presence of craniosynostosis is important because it induces long-term complications such as impairment of neurodevelopment and cognitive function, increased intracranial pressure (Chiari malformation), impairment of cranial nerve function with vision, hearing and speech deficits, and psychological problems. Ultrasound evidence of hydrocephalus is found in approximately 8% of all cases of craniosynostosis; in the case of Apert syndrome, ventriculomegaly is usually non-progressive [16]. The prenatal diagnosis of this syndrome is based on the ultrasonographic examination. There is no specific sign of Apert syndrome in the first trimester due to the insufficient sonographic resolution of the developing fetal structures, such as the fingers. It may be associated with increased nuchal translucency [17].
The severity of cases with Apert syndrome can be evaluated based on the associated craniofacial anomalies that can cause damage to the respiratory tract (reduction in naso/oropharyngeal spaces) and visual impairment. Thus, the prenatal assessment of the severity of craniosynostosis based on the classification of Lu et al. (bicoronal synostosis, pansynostosis, and perpendicular combination of synostosis) can be used as a possible management tool for these patients [18]. Any other element of associated anatomical distortion (e.g., mitten hands, proptosis) increases the degree of severity of these cases, negatively influencing the prognosis [11]. Delahaye et al. demonstrated that suture closure observed in the third trimester of pregnancy was preceded by anatomical distortions and deformations of the fetal skull shape by 4 to 16 weeks [19]. Deformation of the fetal skull shape, abnormal biometry, and ventriculomegaly, identified by 2D/3D ultrasound or MRI, can be imaging markers of fetal craniosynostosis [20,21].
In the second trimester, classic features of Apert syndrome include acrocephaly and brachycephaly, craniofacial dysmorphic elements: flat forehead, maxillary hypoplasia causing a flat midface, hypertelorism, bilateral exophthalmos, low-set ears, small and flat nose, and cleft palate (in one-third of cases). In the conditions of a hypoplastic or malformed pharynx, severe respiratory problems can be associated. During the prenatal examination, possible bone abnormalities can be identified, such as syndactyly present both in the hands and feet, and it is necessary to establish the type of syndactyly (often “mitten-like” hand). Other possible anomalies in the hands and feet that can be identified are the absence of the middle phalanges and absent or supernumerary carpal/tarsal bones [22,23] (Figure 1).
Nonspecific ultrasound findings in Apert syndrome include anomalies of the central nervous system (agenesis of the corpus callosum, ventriculomegaly, gyral abnormalities, posterior fossa malformations), thickened nuchal fold, cardiovascular (atrial and ventricular septal defect, patent foramen ovale), urinary (hydronephrosis, polycystic kidney), genital (cryptorchidia), omphalocele or diaphragmatic hernia, polyhydramnios, and esophageal atresia. These can precede the appearance of skeletal changes [22,23].
Other syndromes associated with syndactyly are facial digital syndrome type I, Cornelia de Lange, Russel Silver, Opitz, Adams Oliver, Holt Oram, Roberts, Fraser, Treacher Collins, and Nager syndromes. They are also associated with other anomalies, such as skeletal defects, but they do not involve the presence of craniosynostosis [25].
Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) is a protein that acts through FGF receptor (FGFR) with tyrosine kinase activity and has implications in morphogenesis, migration, proliferation, and differentiation of stem cells involving osteoblasts and chondroblasts. FGF is responsible for the development of the axial and craniofacial skeletal. The study of the molecular basis of Apert syndrome revealed a genetic mutation of the Ser252Trp or Pro253Arg amino acids, which link the immunoglobulin-like domains II and III of FGFR2. The S252W amino acid mutation is the most frequent and associates severe craniofacial anomalies, and the Pro253Arg amino acid mutation associates severe syndactyly and less severe craniofacial defects [4,17]. FGF8 and FGF10 trigger limb bud development by proliferation of undifferentiated mesenchymal cells. Limb growth results from regulating various genes, including those of the HOX family, and from the effects of FGFs. Mutations in the genes encoding FGFR1, FGFR2, and FGFR3 can cause skeletal dysplasias and craniosynostosis syndromes [26]. The differential diagnosis of Apert syndrome is difficult due to the overlap of clinical signs with other syndromes with craniosynostosis (Table 1).
The early prenatal diagnosis of Apert syndrome and, respectively, of other syndromes involving craniosynostosis is correlated with the prognosis of these cases and the therapeutic management related to the gestational age at which the diagnosis is established; because in many countries, according to the legislation, the termination of pregnancy argued by for medical reasons is allowed up to 24 weeks of gestation. Therefore, we performed an all-time electronic search of the specialized literature. We accessed the PubMed database and selected the articles (case series and case reports) written in English, French, and Spanish. Search terms were “craniosynostosis”, “Apert syndrome”, “early prenatal diagnosis”, “second-trimester screening”, “treatment”, “prognosis”, AND “fetuses” OR “newborns”. In the end, 27 articles were eligible, totaling 32 cases included in this article’s review (Table 2).
The average maternal age in the presented cases was 31.9 (range 23–39). The average gestational age at which changes suggestive of Apert syndrome were identified in the US was 21.3 weeks (range 17.3–24).
Early detection in the second trimester is difficult because the standard anomalies (craniofacial deformities, syndactyly) are often preceded by a non-specific set of anomalies (cardiovascular, central nervous system, renal, digestive) responsible for the heterogeneous nature of the clinical profile. As a result, the severity of Apert forms is assessed based on the early identification of one or more associated anomalies.
Furthermore, 23/32 (71.8%) patients were molecularly tested, of which 82.6% (n = 19) of patients opted for termination of pregnancy (TOP). According to the analysis of the presented cases, it is observed that early prenatal detection is accompanied by an increased rate of TOP (75%) due to the severity of the ultrasound features compared to the cases where the ultrasound markers are detected late. As a result, a careful and systematic ultrasound evaluation during the second trimester is crucial for the prognosis of these cases.
In 31/32 (96.8%) of the cases, there were changes in the shape of the head, of which 26/31 (83.7%) were visualized by ultrasound and 5 by subsequent MRI scanning. In one case, the second-trimester scan showed a normal shape of the skull, and a re-evaluation performed after 3 weeks showed colpocephaly and, after another 3 weeks, craniosynostosis and widely open metopic suture. Thus, two cases of agenesis of the corpus callosum (ACC) were suspected; the MRI analysis confirmed it only in one case. Also, an MRI was used to establish the diagnosis in a case of corpus callosum dysgenesis. Hypertelorism in 14/32 (43.7%) was visualized sonographically in 78.5% (n = 11) cases, and three cases were detected after MRI scanning. The diagnosis of proptosis was established sonographically in 6 out of 11 cases, one was identified after performing an MRI, and 4 cases (36.3%) were diagnosed during fetal examination after TOP.
Anomalies of the fingers (syndactyly) were diagnosed by prenatal imaging in 28 cases (87.5%), of which 18 cases (60%) involved the hands and the feet. The syndactyly involving only the hands was observed antenatally in 10 cases, with mitten type in 9 cases. Additionally, postmortem fetal examination revealed 3 cases of mitten hands.
Antenatal imaging evaluation also identified three cases of cardiovascular anomalies (hypoplastic left ventricle and ascending aorta, coarctation of the aorta, ventricular septal defect, and overriding of the aorta), two cases of renal anomalies (bilateral hydronephrosis), one case with abnormally expanded lungs confirmed both sonographically and MRI, and one case of digestive anomaly (omphalocele) (Table 3).
The treatment of patients with Apert syndrome is a real challenge, requiring a multidisciplinary team and scheduled surgical corrections at different stages of development. Thus, craniosynostosis and disorders secondary to brain compression are repaired by craniotomy in the first year of life, palate repair between 6 and 14 months, syndactyly between 1 and 4 years, jaw surgery, and mid-face anomalies between 4 and 6 years, after the completion of growth orthognathic correction. All other associated manifestations, such as strabismus, hearing loss, and sleep apnea, require surgical or drug treatment, depending on severity, to improve the patient’s quality of life [57,58,59].
The prognosis, social integration, and quality of life of these patients depend on the severity of the condition. Some patients, although psychologically supported by the family, even after the therapeutic interventions, may present intellectual disabilities or psychosocial disorders.

3. Conclusions

The presence of suggestive ultrasound changes and/or associated anomalies makes early prenatal diagnosis of Apert syndrome an important tool in the optimal assessment of the degree of severity for each case. The use of 3D ultrasound allowed a better understanding by the parents of the fetal damage, facilitating counseling and providing useful information regarding the decision to terminate the pregnancy in cases with an unfavorable prognosis due to long-term complications such as impaired neurologic and cognitive development or problems caused by facial dysmorphism, craniosynostosis, and skeletal malformations.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.N.V.; methodology, V.N.V. and D.E.; software, R.G.V.; validation, V.N.V.; formal analysis, R.G.V. and D.E.; investigation, R.G.V.; resources, R.G.V.; data curation, R.G.V. and D.E.; writing—original draft preparation, V.N.V.; writing—review and editing, V.N.V. and R.G.V.; visualization, V.N.V.; supervision, V.N.V.; project administration, V.N.V.; funding acquisition, V.N.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.


Publication of this paper was supported by the Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy through the institutional program Publish not Perish.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the decision of the Ethics Committee of the Filantropia Hospital (no. 807/31 January 2024).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


  1. Hehr, U.; Muenke, M. Craniosynostosis Syndromes: From Genes to Premature Fusion of Skull Bones. Mol. Genet. Metab. 1999, 68, 139–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wilkie, A.O.M.; Byren, J.C.; Hurst, J.A.; Jayamohan, J.; Johnson, D.; Knight, S.J.L.; Lester, T.; Richards, P.G.; Twigg, S.R.F.; Wall, S.A. Prevalence and Complications of Single-Gene and Chromosomal Disorders in Craniosynostosis. Pediatrics 2010, 126, e391–e400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Arroyo Carrera, I.; Martínez-Frías, M.L.; Marco Pérez, J.J.; Paisán Grisolía, L.; Cárdenes Rodríguez, A.; Nieto Conde, C.; Félix Rodríguez, V.; Egüés Jimeno, J.J.; Morales Fernández, M.C.; Gómez-Ullate Vergara, J.; et al. Apert syndrome: Clinico-epidemiological analysis of a series of consecutive cases in Spain. An. Esp. Pediatr. 1999, 51, 667–672. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Das, S.; Munshi, A. Research Advances in Apert Syndrome. J. Oral Biol. Craniofac. Res. 2018, 8, 194–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Johnson, D.; Wilkie, A.O.M. Craniosynostosis. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. EJHG 2011, 19, 369–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. López-Estudillo, A.-S.; Rosales-Bérber, M.-A.; Ruiz-Rodríguez, S.; Pozos-Guillén, A.; Noyola-Frías, M.-Á.; Garrocho-Rangel, A. Dental Approach for Apert Syndrome in Children: A Systematic Review. Med. Oral Patol. Oral Cirugia Bucal 2017, 22, e660–e668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Vieira, C.; Teixeira, N.; Cadilhe, A.; Reis, I. Apert Syndrome: Prenatal Diagnosis Challenge. BMJ Case Rep. 2019, 12, e231982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Cohen, M.M.; Kreiborg, S.; Lammer, E.J.; Cordero, J.F.; Mastroiacovo, P.; Erickson, J.D.; Roeper, P.; Martínez-Frías, M.L. Birth Prevalence Study of the Apert Syndrome. Am. J. Med. Genet. 1992, 42, 655–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Tolarova, M.M.; Harris, J.A.; Ordway, D.E.; Vargervik, K. Birth Prevalence, Mutation Rate, Sex Ratio, Parents’ Age, and Ethnicity in Apert Syndrome. Am. J. Med. Genet. 1997, 72, 394–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Conrady, C.D.; Patel, B.C.; Sharma, S. Apert Syndrome. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  11. David, A.L.; Turnbull, C.; Scott, R.; Freeman, J.; Bilardo, C.M.; van Maarle, M.; Chitty, L.S. Diagnosis of Apert Syndrome in the Second-Trimester Using 2D and 3D Ultrasound. Prenat. Diagn. 2007, 27, 629–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Werner, H.; Castro, P.; Daltro, P.; Lopes, J.; Ribeiro, G.; Araujo Júnior, E. Prenatal Diagnosis of Apert Syndrome Using Ultrasound, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Three-Dimensional Virtual/Physical Models: Three Case Series and Literature Review. Childs Nerv. Syst. ChNS Off. J. Int. Soc. Pediatr. Neurosurg. 2018, 34, 1563–1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Overview of Craniosynostosis—UpToDate. Available online: (accessed on 24 January 2024).
  14. Craniosynostosis Syndromes—UpToDate. Available online: (accessed on 24 January 2024).
  15. Bouaré, F.; Noureldine, M.H.A.; Hajhouji, F.; Ghannane, H.; Jallo, G.I.; Ait Benali, S. Complex Craniosynostosis in the Context of Carpenter’s Syndrome. Childs Nerv. Syst. ChNS Off. J. Int. Soc. Pediatr. Neurosurg. 2022, 38, 831–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Xue, A.S.; Buchanan, E.P.; Hollier, L.H.J. Update in Management of Craniosynostosis. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2022, 149, 1209e. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Apert Syndrome: Acrocephalosyndactyly. Available online: (accessed on 24 January 2024).
  18. Lu, X.; Sawh-Martinez, R.; Jorge Forte, A.; Wu, R.; Cabrejo, R.; Wilson, A.; Steinbacher, D.M.; Alperovich, M.; Alonso, N.; Persing, J.A. Classification of Subtypes of Apert Syndrome, Based on the Type of Vault Suture Synostosis. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Glob. Open 2019, 7, e2158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Delahaye, S.; Bernard, J.P.; Rénier, D.; Ville, Y. Prenatal Ultrasound Diagnosis of Fetal Craniosynostosis. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. Off. J. Int. Soc. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2003, 21, 347–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Harada, A.; Miyashita, S.; Nagai, R.; Makino, S.; Murotsuki, J. Prenatal Sonographic Findings and Prognosis of Craniosynostosis Diagnosed during the Fetal and Neonatal Periods. Congenit. Anom. 2019, 59, 132–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Helfer, T.M.; Peixoto, A.B.; Tonni, G.; Araujo Júnior, E. Craniosynostosis: Prenatal Diagnosis by 2D/3D Ultrasound, Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography. Med. Ultrason. 2016, 18, 378–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Patel, B.; Suchet, I. Postmortem Computed Tomography in a Case of Apert Syndrome: Correlation with Conventional Autopsy and Prenatal Ultrasound. Ultrasound Q. 2010, 26, 249–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Apert Syndrome. Available online: (accessed on 24 January 2024).
  24. Valentin, V.; Georgiana, B.; Dragos, G. Ultrasound and Clinical Correlations in Apert Syndrome. In Proceedings of the 5th Romanian Congress of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 20–22 April 2017; Vlădăreanu, S., Mărginean, C., Vlădăreanu, R., Eds.; Editura Filodirrito: Bologna, Italy; Târgu Mureș, Romania; pp. 623–629. [Google Scholar]
  25. Franco, B.; Bruel, A.-L.; Thauvin-Robinet, C. Oral-Facial-Digital Syndrome Type I. In GeneReviews®; Adam, M.P., Feldman, J., Mirzaa, G.M., Pagon, R.A., Wallace, S.E., Bean, L.J., Gripp, K.W., Amemiya, A., Eds.; University of Washington, Seattle: Seattle, WA, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  26. Thisse, B.; Thisse, C. Functions and Regulations of Fibroblast Growth Factor Signaling during Embryonic Development. Dev. Biol. 2005, 287, 390–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Conrady, C.D.; Patel, B.C. Crouzon Syndrome. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  28. Nguyen, Q.D.; Tran, T.N.A.; Nguyen, H.T. Crouzon Syndrome with Acanthosis Nigricans: A Case Report and Literature Review. Dermatol. Rep. 2023, 15, 9620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Nørgaard, P.; Hagen, C.P.; Hove, H.; Dunø, M.; Nissen, K.R.; Kreiborg, S.; Jørgensen, F.S. Crouzon Syndrome Associated with Acanthosis Nigricans: Prenatal 2D and 3D Ultrasound Findings and Postnatal 3D CT Findings. Acta Radiol. Short Rep. 2012, 1, arsr.2012.110017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. M Das, J.; Winters, R. Pfeiffer Syndrome. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  31. Gallagher, E.R.; Ratisoontorn, C.; Cunningham, M.L. Saethre-Chotzen Syndrome. In GeneReviews®; Adam, M.P., Feldman, J., Mirzaa, G.M., Pagon, R.A., Wallace, S.E., Bean, L.J., Gripp, K.W., Amemiya, A., Eds.; University of Washington, Seattle: Seattle, WA, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  32. Kruszka, P.; Rolle, M.; Kahle, K.T.; Muenke, M. Muenke Syndrome. In GeneReviews®; Adam, M.P., Feldman, J., Mirzaa, G.M., Pagon, R.A., Wallace, S.E., Bean, L.J., Gripp, K.W., Amemiya, A., Eds.; University of Washington, Seattle: Seattle, WA, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  33. Heike, C.; Seto, M.; Hing, A.; Palidin, A.; Hu, F.Z.; Preston, R.A.; Ehrlich, G.D.; Cunningham, M. Century of Jackson-Weiss Syndrome: Further Definition of Clinical and Radiographic Findings in ?Lost? Descendants of the Original Kindred. Am. J. Med. Genet. 2001, 100, 315–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Narayan, H.; Scott, I.V. Prenatal Ultrasound Diagnosis of Apert’s Syndrome. Prenat. Diagn. 1991, 11, 187–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ferreira, J.C.; Carter, S.M.; Bernstein, P.S.; Jabs, E.W.; Glickstein, J.S.; Marion, R.W.; Baergen, R.N.; Gross, S.J. Second-Trimester Molecular Prenatal Diagnosis of Sporadic Apert Syndrome Following Suspicious Ultrasound Findings. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 1999, 14, 426–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Boog, G.; Le Vaillant, C.; Winer, N.; David, A.; Quere, M.P.; Nomballais, M.F. Contribution of Tridimensional Sonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Prenatal Diagnosis of Apert Syndrome at Mid-Trimester. Fetal Diagn. Ther. 1999, 14, 20–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lyu, K.J.; Ko, T.M. Prenatal Diagnosis of Apert Syndrome with Widely Separated Cranial Sutures. Prenat. Diagn. 2000, 20, 254–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Skidmore, D.L.; Pai, A.P.; Toi, A.; Steele, L.; Chitayat, D. Prenatal Diagnosis of Apert Syndrome: Report of Two Cases. Prenat. Diagn. 2003, 23, 1009–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Hansen, W.F.; Rijhsinghani, A.; Grant, S.; Yankowitz, J. Prenatal Diagnosis of Apert Syndrome. Fetal Diagn. Ther. 2004, 19, 127–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Esser, T.; Rogalla, P.; Bamberg, C.; Kalache, K.D. Application of the Three-Dimensional Maximum Mode in Prenatal Diagnosis of Apert Syndrome. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2005, 193, 1743–1745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lam, H.; Lo, T.-K.; Lau, E.; Chin, R.; Tang, L. The Use of 2- and 3-Dimensional Sonographic Scans in the Evaluation of Cranial Sutures: Prenatal Diagnosis of Apert Syndrome. J. Ultrasound Med. Off. J. Am. Inst. Ultrasound Med. 2006, 25, 1481–1484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Quintero-Rivera, F.; Robson, C.D.; Reiss, R.E.; Levine, D.; Benson, C.; Mulliken, J.B.; Kimonis, V.E. Apert Syndrome: What Prenatal Radiographic Findings Should Prompt Its Consideration? Prenat. Diagn. 2006, 26, 966–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Respondek-Liberska, M.; Smigiel, R.; Zielinski, A.; Sasiadek, M.M. Progressive Development of Sonographic Features in Prenatal Diagnosis of Apert Syndrome--Case Report and Literature Review. Ginekol. Pol. 2010, 81, 935–939. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  44. Chen, C.-P.; Su, Y.-N.; Hsu, C.-Y.; Ling, P.-Y.; Tsai, F.-J.; Chern, S.-R.; Wu, P.-C.; Chen, H.-E.C.; Wang, W. Second-Trimester Molecular Prenatal Diagnosis of Sporadic Apert Syndrome Following Sonographic Findings of Mild Ventriculomegaly and Clenched Hands Mimicking Trisomy 18. Taiwan. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2010, 49, 129–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Ludwig, K.; Salmaso, R.; Manara, R.; Cosmi, E.; Baldi, M.; Rugge, M. Apert Syndrome with Fused Thalami. Fetal Pediatr. Pathol. 2012, 31, 410–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Ercoli, G.; Bidondo, M.P.; Senra, B.C.; Groisman, B. Apert Syndrome with Omphalocele: A Case Report. Birt. Defects Res. A Clin. Mol. Teratol. 2014, 100, 726–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Pi, G.; Zúñiga, A.; Cervera, J.; Ortiz, M. Prenatal diagnosis of Apert syndrome caused by de novo mutation in FGFR2 gene. An. Pediatr. Barc. Spain 2003 2014, 80, e104–e105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Giancotti, A.; D’Ambrosio, V.; De Filippis, A.; Aliberti, C.; Pasquali, G.; Bernardo, S.; Manganaro, L.; PECRAM Study Group. Comparison of Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Prenatal Diagnosis of Apert Syndrome: Report of a Case. Childs Nerv. Syst. ChNS Off. J. Int. Soc. Pediatr. Neurosurg. 2014, 30, 1445–1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Stark, Z.; McGillivray, G.; Sampson, A.; Palma-Dias, R.; Edwards, A.; Said, J.M.; Whiteley, G.; Fink, A.M. Apert Syndrome: Temporal Lobe Abnormalities on Fetal Brain Imaging. Prenat. Diagn. 2015, 35, 179–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Rubio, E.I.; Blask, A.; Bulas, D.I. Ultrasound and MR Imaging Findings in Prenatal Diagnosis of Craniosynostosis Syndromes. Pediatr. Radiol. 2016, 46, 709–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Wang, Y.-Z.; Tsai, H.-D.; Hsieh, C.T.-C. Prenatal Diagnosis of a Sporadic Apert Syndrome by 3-D Ultrasound and 3-D Helical Computerized Tomography. Taiwan. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2017, 56, 571–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Quintas-Neves, M.; Soares-Fernandes, J.P. Fetal Brain MRI in Apert Syndrome: Early in Vivo Detection of Temporal Lobe Malformation. Childs Nerv. Syst. ChNS Off. J. Int. Soc. Pediatr. Neurosurg. 2018, 34, 1617–1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Shi, Q.; Dai, R.; Wang, R.; Jing, J.; Yu, X.; Liu, R.; Liu, Y. A Novel FGFR2 (S137W) Mutation Resulting in Apert Syndrome: A Case Report. Medicine 2020, 99, e22340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Partoune, S.; Masereel, M.C. Apert syndrome or acrocephalosyndactilia type I. Rev. Med. Liege 2021, 76, 715–718. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  55. Zhang, W.; Xue, H.; Huang, D.; Ye, Y.; Chen, X. Apert Syndrome: A Case Report of Prenatal Ultrasound, Postmortem Cranial CT, and Molecular Genetic Analysis. J. Clin. Ultrasound JCU 2021, 49, 250–253. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  56. Tonni, G.; Grisolia, G.; Baldi, M.; Bonasoni, M.; Ginocchi, V.; Rolo, L.C.; Araujo Júnior, E. Early Prenatal Ultrasound and Molecular Diagnosis of Apert Syndrome: Case Report with Postmortem CT-Scan and Chondral Plate Histology. Fetal Pediatr. Pathol. 2022, 41, 281–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Kumari, K.; Saleh, I.; Taslim, S.; Ahmad, S.; Hussain, I.; Munir, Z.; Javed, T.; Virk, M.F.I.; Javed, S.; Bisharat, P.; et al. Unraveling the Complexity of Apert Syndrome: Genetics, Clinical Insights, and Future Frontiers. Cureus 2023, 15, e47281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Anantheswar, Y.N.; Venkataramana, N.K. Pediatric Craniofacial Surgery for Craniosynostosis: Our Experience and Current Concepts: Part -1. J. Pediatr. Neurosci. 2009, 4, 86–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Wenger, T.L.; Hing, A.V.; Evans, K.N. Apert Syndrome. In GeneReviews®; Adam, M.P., Feldman, J., Mirzaa, G.M., Pagon, R.A., Wallace, S.E., Bean, L.J., Gripp, K.W., Amemiya, A., Eds.; University of Washington, Seattle: Seattle, WA, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Ultrasonographic and macroscopic findings—fetal cranium abnormalities (acrocephaly and brachycephaly), prominent forehead, nasal bone hypoplasia, facial dysmorphism (flat midface, hypertelorism, exorbitism), cleft lip and palate and low-set ears, hands syndactyly, feet syndactyly type IVa at all fingers, with median fusion of the low extremities, ambiguous external genital organs. A gross examination of the head and brain revealed craniosynostosis, hypertelorism, exorbitism, hypoplastic nose, pharynx abnormality, gyral anomalies, hypoplastic white matter, and heterotopic gray matter (personal collection) [24].
Figure 1. Ultrasonographic and macroscopic findings—fetal cranium abnormalities (acrocephaly and brachycephaly), prominent forehead, nasal bone hypoplasia, facial dysmorphism (flat midface, hypertelorism, exorbitism), cleft lip and palate and low-set ears, hands syndactyly, feet syndactyly type IVa at all fingers, with median fusion of the low extremities, ambiguous external genital organs. A gross examination of the head and brain revealed craniosynostosis, hypertelorism, exorbitism, hypoplastic nose, pharynx abnormality, gyral anomalies, hypoplastic white matter, and heterotopic gray matter (personal collection) [24].
Diagnostics 14 01480 g001
Table 1. Differential diagnosis of Apert syndrome.
Table 1. Differential diagnosis of Apert syndrome.
SyndromeIncidenceInheritanceGene MutationsCommon AnomaliesAssociated AnomaliesOutcome
6–15.5 in 1 million live birthsAutosomal dominantFGFR2 on chromosome 10qCraniosynostosis, midface hypoplasia, and syndactyly in the hands and feetCardiovascular anomalies (atrial/ventricular septum defects, patent foramen ovale), cleft palate, central nervous system (agenesis corpus callosum, gyral anomalies), and urinary (hydronephrosis)Cognitive impairment, respiratory complications, neurologic deficits, ocular anomalies
Crouzon + acanthosis nigricans [28,29]
16 in 1 million live birthsAutosomal dominantFGFR2Compared to Apert, the degree of facial dysmorphism is milder, and the presence of cleft palate is rare. They usually have normal hands and feetCervical spine malformationsStrabismus, amblyopia, sleep apnea. Cognitive disabilities according to the severity of the cranial abnormality
1 in 1 million live birthsAutosomal dominantFGFR3 Craniosynostosis, midface hypoplasia, choanal atresia Narrow sciatic notch, short vertebra, and broad metacarpals
10 in 1 million live birthsAutosomal dominantFGFR1/FGFR2Compared to Apert, the degree of syndactyly is milder (partial syndactyly of the 2nd–3rd fingers as well as the 2nd–4th toes)Imperforate anus, hydrocephalus, and radio-humeral synostosisObstructive sleep apnea, neurodevelopmental impairment, seizures, ocular complications. Type 1—better prognosis for intellectual outcome. Types 2 and 3—severe neurologic defects, death in childhood
Carpenter [15]1 in 1 million live birthsAutosomal recessiveRAB23 (RAS-associated protein)Coronal, sagittal, and lambdoid craniosynostosis, which cause prominence of the metopic suture and brachycephalyCardiovascular anomalies, hypogonadism, omphalocele, polydactyly, brachydactyly, and clinodactylyCraniosynostosis surgery with satisfactory esthetics of the craniofacial bones. Psychomotor delay, potential blindness, decreased visual acuity
20 in 1 million live birthsAutosomal dominantTWIST/FGFR2Compared to Apert, patients have a towering forehead, low-set hairline, facial asymmetry, ptosis of the upper eyelidsCutaneous syndactyly is usually partial and involves the 2nd–3rd fingers and/or the 3rd–4th toesSleep disorder breathing, developmental delays. Dental malocclusion, swallowing difficulties. Hearing loss, amblyopia
Muenke [32]33.3 in 1 million live birthsAutosomal dominantFGFR3Coronal synostosis or pan synostosis Anterior plagiocephaly, temporal bossing, fusions of carpal and/or tarsal bones; brachydactyly, broad toes and thumbs, clinodactylyBehavioral issues, seizures. Hearing loss, strabismus. Developmental delays, intellectual disabilities
Jackson-Weiss [33]UnknownAutosomal dominantFGFR2 on chromosome 10q26Craniosynostosis, mid-face hypoplasia, abnormally broad great toes, and/or malformation/fusion of bones from the feet.-Hearing impairment, normal intelligence, and a normal lifespan
FGFR—fibroblast growth factor receptor.
Table 2. An overview of the early prenatal diagnosis of Apert syndrome in newborns was all-time searched in the PubMed database.
Table 2. An overview of the early prenatal diagnosis of Apert syndrome in newborns was all-time searched in the PubMed database.
Maternal AgeGA at Diagnosis/SexUltrasound/MRI FindingsFetal ExaminationFGFR2 MutationOutcome
Narayan 1991,
29, mother with AS19–20, FThe skull outline is very irregular and oval, “mitten” hands syndactyly.Postmortem examination confirmed the features.Not testedStillbirth, VD—34 wks
Ferreira 1999,
3320, MTurribrachycephaly, acrocephaly, frontal bossing, short nose, bilateral 2nd-to-5th-finger syndactyly of the hand (‘mitten type’), abnormal toes.The pathological examination confirmed the prenatal diagnosis.S252WTOP
Boog 1999,
2824, MTurribrachycephaly, clover-leaf skull, midface hypoplasia, down slanting palpebral fissures, depressed nasal bridge, “mitten type” with 2nd-to-5th-finger total syndactyly of the hands, complete cutaneous fused toes with a broad big toe high forehead.
MRI—brachycephaly and verticalization of the clivus with a flattened cranial base angle, hypertelorism.
The pathological examination confirmed the prenatal diagnosis.Not testedTOP
Lyu 2000,
35, mother with AS20, FFrontal bossing, all cranial sutures widely separated, midface depression, syndactyly, fused toes.The pathological examination confirmed the prenatal diagnosis, with both fontanels open.Heterozygous 934C-GTOP
Skidmore 2003,
3417.3/19 + 5, FClover-leaf skull, proptosis, VM, low-set ears, syndactyly of the hands, and broad first toes.Turribrachycephaly, proptosis, a narrow and high arched palate, bilateral bony syndactyly, 2nd-to-5th-finger hands and feet, mitten-thumb, coarctation of the aorta.755C → G, (S252W)TOP
3321Clover-leaf skull, VM, hypoplastic left heart.Turribrachycephaly, hypertelorism, flat occiput, proptosis, beaked nose, midface hypoplasia, syndactyly, hypoplastic left ventricle, and hypo-plastic ascending aorta proximal to the ductus arteriosus.755C → G, (S252W)TOP
Hansen 2004,
2323, MAbnormally shaped skull, syndactyly of the hands.Craniosynostosis, craniofacial anomalies, bony and cutaneous syndactyly of the hands and feet. Pro253ArgVD at 32.5 wks
2621, FAbnormally shaped skull, syndactyly, or an abnormal posturing of the hands.N/ANot testedVD at 27 + 2 wks. Died at 4 m
Esser 2005,
2922Widely open metopic suture with craniosynostosis, 2nd-to-4th-finger hands syndactyly.Postmortem CT confirmed the prenatal findings. No autopsy was performed.Heterozygous
Pro253Arg (C758G)
Lam 2006,
2619Strawberry head shape, craniosynostosis, ventricular septal defect, overriding of the aorta, syndactyly of the hands and feet.Widely opened metopic suture, craniosynostosis, midface hypoplasia, bilateral syndactyly of the hands and feet. No autopsy was performed.Heterozygous C1347G—
Quintero-Rivera 2006,
3719, MUS—colpocephaly, ACC
MRI—ACC, hypertelorism, oblong cranial shape.
Turricephaly, widely fontanelles and sagittal suture, fused toes, complex syndactyly, prominent downslanted eyes, hypertelorism, beaked nose, midface hypoplasia, depressed nasal bridge, mild tricuspid regurgitation. Postnatal 3D CT coronal craniosynostosis, wide midline calvarial defect, shallow orbits, midfacial hypoplasia.S252WCS at 39 wks
David 2007,
N/A21Brachycephaly, VM, prominent forehead, proptosis, increased NT, absent nasal bone, abnormal DV, “mitten” hands, syndactyly of the hands and feet, arched foot, bilateral hydronephrosis.The pathological examination confirmed the prenatal diagnosis.S252WTOP
N/A20 + 5Long head, craniosynostosis, pro-ptosis, “mitten” hands, syndactyly of the hands and feet, small feet, abnormal position.Syndactyly of the hands and feet, proptosis, and abnormal head shape. No autopsy was performed.S252WTOP
N/A22 + 5Long head, flat occiput, mild VM, syndactyly of the hands, feet abnormal position, clitoromegaly.The pathological examination confirmed the prenatal diagnosis.P253RTOP
Patel 2010,
3122 + 3No significant brachycephaly, craniosynostosis, borderline VM, depressed nasal bridge, mild hypertelorism, cystic left orbit, or syndactyly of the hands and feet.Postmortem 3D CT frontal bossing, wide metopic sutures with partial synostosis of coronal sutures, midface hypoplasia, hypertelorism, depressed nasal bridge. Autopsy—reasonable correlations of craniofacial anomalies.Not testedTOP
Respondek-Liberska 2010,
3122, F22 wks—normal head shape, mild VM; 25 wks—colpocephaly, syndactyly of the hands and feet, mild hypertelorism; 28 wks—prominent forehead, craniosynostosis, midface hypoplasia, widely open metopic suture.Typical facial appearance of AS, symmetrical, complex syndactyly of the hands 2nd-to-5th-fingers. The thumbs were not involved in the fusion. Feet syndactyly affected all toes.S252W in exon 7 CS at term
Chen 2010,
3024, MMidface hypoplasia, low-set ears, mild VM, mitten hand, 2nd-to-4th-finger syndactyly and abroad proximally deviated thumb.Prominent midface hypoplasia, low-set ears, bilateral mitten syndactyly of the hands and feet, broad and proximally displaced thumbs, and big toes.Heterozygous c.755 C>G, Ser252Trp (S252W)TOP
Ludwig 2012,
3820 + 1, FTurricephaly, frontal bossing, midface hypoplasia, low-set ears, hyperthelorism, and reduced facial movements.Postmortem external examination—turribrachycephaly, prominent forehead, midface hypoplasia, proptosis, slightly down palpebral fissures, hypoplastic alae nasi, smooth palate cleft; hand—complete cutaneous syndactyly 2nd-to-4th-fingers II, III, IV with synonchia, Hitchhiker thumb; feet—broad halluces, complete cutaneous syndactyly toe 1st-to-4th-fingers, short V toe. Postmortem CT and MRI confirmed craniosynostosis, ACC, absence of the septum pellucidum, and complete fusion of the thalami. Ser252Trp in exon 8 TOP
Ercoli 2014,
3023, MTurricephaly, syndactyly, and omphalocele.Turribrachycephaly, high arched palate, broad forehead, midface hypoplasia, hypertelorism, exophthalmos, syndactyly of hands and feet, bilateral cryptorchidism, omphalocele. Rx—craniosynostosis, synostosis between metacarpians and metatarsal bones.Not testedCS at 35 wks
Pi 2014,
N/A18/20/21/22 + 4, F18 wks—cranial anomalies, syndactyly of the hands and feet; 20 wks—mild bilateral hydronephrosis, strawberry skull; 21 wks—craniosynostosis; 22 + 4 wks—craniosynostosis, low-set ears, frontal bulging, hypertelorism, syndactyly of the fingers of both hands.Craniosynostosis, wide anterior fontanel, metopic suture dehiscence, synostosis of the lambdoid suture, ocular proptosis, low-set ears, medial palatal fissure, mild hypertelorism, the fingers and toes brachydactyly, syndactyly, 2–5 fingers and toes.Heterozygous c.755C>G, p.Ser252Trp (NM 022970)TOP
Giancotti 2014,
3721, MUS—irregular head shape, dolicocephaly, prominent forehead, flat occiput, bilateral mild VM, partial ACC, hypertelorism, midface hypoplasia, depressed nasal bridge, feet abnormal position, and syndactyly. MRI—excluded ACC.Fetus macroscopic analysis: syndactyly of the hands (“spoon hands”) and feet, midface hypoplasia, prominent forehead.No postmortem autopsy.Heterozygous c.758C>G
Stark 2015,
N/A21US—craniosynostosis, syndactyly, coarctation of the aorta. MRI—turribrachycephaly, CCD, temporal over-expansion/over-sulcation, transverse temporal cleftsThe pathological examination confirmed the prenatal diagnosis.c.755C>G (p.Ser252Trp)N/A
Rubio 2016,
N/A22US/MRI—calvarial indentation, hypertelorism, proptosis, syndactyly of the hands and feet.N/ANSTOP
N/A21/30US—calvarial indentation, “lamp-shade” calvarium, hypertelorism, syndactyly of the hands and feet, abnormally expanded lungs. MRI—plus proptosis, absent septum pellucidum.N/ANSSurvived
Wang 2017,
2723, FCraniosynostosis, widely open metopic suture and anterior fontanel, midface hypoplasia, mitten hands, bony or cutaneous syndactyly of the hands and feet.Fetal phenotype compatible with AS. No postmortem autopsy.Not testedTOP
Varlas 2017,
3221Acrocephaly and brachycephaly, prominent forehead, nasal bone hypoplasia, exorbitism, flat midface, hypertelorism, low-set ears, cleft lip and palate, syndactyly of the hands and feet with lack of low extremities movements, vicious positions of the limbs.The macroscopic examination confirmed the US diagnosis (craniosynostosis with acrocephaly and brachycephaly, flat midface, hypertelorism, cleft lip and palate, syndactyly of the hands and feet—the fusion of the bone and soft tissue components of all fingers).Not testedTOP
Quintas-Neves 2018,
3322 + 2US—craniosynostosis, ocular proptosis, syndactyly of the hands and feet.MRI—turribrachycephaly, hypertelorism, over convolution, abnormal sulci in inferior and mesial temporal lobes. N/A c.755C>G (p.Ser252Trp) TOP
Vieira 2019,
3322, FUS—prominent forehead, hypertelorism, proptosis, mitten hands. MRI—hypertelorism, turribrachycephaly, cranial dysmorphism, cortical malformation. Craniosynostosis, hypertelorism, low-set ears, proptosis, bilateral syndactyly of the 2nd-to-5th fingers in hands and all fingers in the feet.c.755C>G
Shi 2020,
3223 + 5Clover-leaf skull, syndactyly from the 2nd-to-5th finger.Acrocephalosyndactyly and hypertelorism.c.410C>G, chr10:123279677 (p.S137W)TOP
Partoune 2021,
3923 + 5, M (twin)Skull deformation, syndactyly—mitten hand. 27 wks—facial dysmorphism, small cerebellar vermis, syndactyly of the hands and feet, moderate VM, hypertelorism.N/Ac.758C>G (p.Pro253Arg)selective TOP at 33 + 4 wks
Zhang 2021,
3623, FUnusual head shape, craniosynostosis, mild left VM, slight frontal bossing, proptosis, hypertelorism, syndactyly.The pathological examination confirmed the prenatal diagnosis syndactyly of type VI (known as mitten type).c.755C>G
Tonni 2022,
3619, FTurribrachicephaly, wide metopic suture, craniosynostosis, and syndactyly of the left hand.Acrocephaly, broad forehead, mid-face hypoplasia, depressed nasal bridge, exophthalmos. The right hand—spade-shaped with thumb and index separated; the left hand—mitten-shaped with complete cutaneous syndactyly of fingers I-V, the feet—broad halluces and complete cutaneous syndactyly of all toes.c.758C>Gp at 252 of the exon 8TOP
GA—gestational age; AS—Apert syndrome; TOP—termination of pregnancy; VD—vaginal delivery; CS—cesarean section; ACC—agenesis of the corpus callosum; VM—ventriculomegaly; CCD—corpus callosum dysgenesis; DV—ductus venosus; wks—weeks; m—months; N/A—not available.
Table 3. Distribution of imaging (US, MRI) findings among Apert syndrome cases identified in the review.
Table 3. Distribution of imaging (US, MRI) findings among Apert syndrome cases identified in the review.
Anomalies FindingsUltrasound/MRI Findings n (%)
  Abnormal head shape 31 (96.8%)
  Suture morphology 15 (46.8%)
  Ventriculomegaly 10 (31.2%)
  ACC/DCC 2/1 (9.3%)
  Hypertelorism 14 (43.7%)
  Proptosis 7 (21.8%)
  Midface hypoplasia 8 (25%)
  Prominent forehead 5 (15.6%)
  Low-set ears 5 (15.6%)
  Nasal deformity 5 (15.6%)
  Syndactyly 28 (87.5%)
  Abnormal toes 3 (9.3%)
Cardiovascular 3 (9.3%)
Renal 2 (6.2%)
Digestive 1 (3.1%)
ACC/DCC—agenesis/dysgenesis of corpus callosum.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Varlas, V.N.; Epistatu, D.; Varlas, R.G. Emphasis on Early Prenatal Diagnosis and Perinatal Outcomes Analysis of Apert Syndrome. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 1480.

AMA Style

Varlas VN, Epistatu D, Varlas RG. Emphasis on Early Prenatal Diagnosis and Perinatal Outcomes Analysis of Apert Syndrome. Diagnostics. 2024; 14(14):1480.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Varlas, Valentin Nicolae, Dragos Epistatu, and Roxana Georgiana Varlas. 2024. "Emphasis on Early Prenatal Diagnosis and Perinatal Outcomes Analysis of Apert Syndrome" Diagnostics 14, no. 14: 1480.

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop