Functional and Morphological Outcomes after Trabeculectomy and Deep Sclerectomy—Results from a Monocentric Registry Study
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Jayaram, H.; Kolko, M.; Friedman, D.S.; Gazzard, G. Glaucoma: Now and beyond. Lancet 2023, 402, 1788–1801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- The AGIS Investigators. The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 7. The relationship between control of intraocular pressure and visual field deterioration. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2000, 130, 429–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heijl, A.; Leske, M.C.; Bengtsson, B.; Hyman, L.; Bengtsson, B.; Hussein, M. Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: Results from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2002, 120, 1268–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Garway-Heath, D.F.; Crabb, D.P.; Bunce, C.; Lascaratos, G.; Amalfitano, F.; Anand, N.; Azuara-Blanco, A.; Bourne, R.R.; Broadway, D.C.; Cunliffe, I.A.; et al. Latanoprost for open-angle glaucoma (UKGTS): A randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2015, 385, 1295–1304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stein, J.D.; Khawaja, A.P.; Weizer, J.S. Glaucoma in Adults-Screening, Diagnosis, and Management: A Review. Jama 2021, 325, 164–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cairns, J. Trabeculectomy: Preliminary report of a new method. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 1968, 66, 673–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rulli, E.; Biagioli, E.; Riva, I.; Gambirasio, G.; De Simone, I.; Floriani, I.; Quaranta, L. Efficacy and safety of trabeculectomy vs. nonpenetrating surgical procedures: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013, 131, 1573–1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tseng, V.L.; Kim, C.H.; Romero, P.T.; Yu, F.; Robertson-Brown, K.W.; Phung, L.; Raygoza, D.; Caprioli, J.; Coleman, A.L. Risk Factors and Long-Term Outcomes in Patients with Low Intraocular Pressure after Trabeculectomy. Ophthalmology 2017, 124, 1457–1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gedde, S.J.; Feuer, W.J.; Lim, K.S.; Barton, K.; Goyal, S.; Ahmed, I.I.; Brandt, J.D. Postoperative Complications in the Primary Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study During 5 Years of Follow-up. Ophthalmology 2022, 129, 1357–1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roy, S.; Mermoud, A. Deep Sclerectomy. Dev. Ophthalmol. 2017, 59, 36–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bormann, C.; Busch, C.; Rehak, M.; Schmidt, M.; Scharenberg, C.; Ziemssen, F.; Unterlauft, J.D. Two Year Functional and Structural Changes-A Comparison between Trabeculectomy and XEN Microstent Implantation Using Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 5840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Khaw, P.T.; Chiang, M.; Shah, P.; Sii, F.; Lockwood, A.; Khalili, A. Enhanced Trabeculectomy: The Moorfields Safer Surgery System. Dev. Ophthalmol. 2017, 59, 15–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pinchuk, L.; Riss, I.; Batlle, J.F.; Beckers, H.; Stalmans, I. An ab externo minimally invasive aqueous shunt comprised of a novel biomaterial. In Current Developments in Glaucoma Surgery and Migs; Kugler Publications: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 181–192. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, T.C.; Wilensky, J.T.; Viana, M.A. Long-term follow-up of initially successful trabeculectomy. Ophthalmology 1997, 104, 1120–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Edmunds, B.; Thompson, J.R.; Salmon, J.F.; Wormald, R.P. The National Survey of Trabeculectomy. II. Variations in operative technique and outcome. Eye 2001, 15, 441–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bevin, T.H.; Molteno, A.C.; Herbison, P. Otago Glaucoma Surgery Outcome Study: Long-term results of 841 trabeculectomies. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2008, 36, 731–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Musch, D.C.; Gillespie, B.W.; Niziol, L.M.; Lichter, P.R.; Varma, R. Intraocular pressure control and long-term visual field loss in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study. Ophthalmology 2011, 118, 1766–1773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Landers, J.; Martin, K.; Sarkies, N.; Bourne, R.; Watson, P. A twenty-year follow-up study of trabeculectomy: Risk factors and outcomes. Ophthalmology 2012, 119, 694–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kirwan, J.F.; Lockwood, A.J.; Shah, P.; Macleod, A.; Broadway, D.C.; King, A.J.; McNaught, A.I.; Agrawal, P. Trabeculectomy in the 21st century: A multicenter analysis. Ophthalmology 2013, 120, 2532–2539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chua, J.; Kadziauskienė, A.; Wong, D.; Ašoklis, R.; Lesinskas, E.; Quang, N.D.; Chong, R.; Tan, B.; Girard, M.J.A.; Mari, J.M.; et al. One year structural and functional glaucoma progression after trabeculectomy. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 2808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Demirtaş, A.A.; Karahan, M.; Erdem, S.; Aslan Kaya, A.; Keklikçi, U. Long-term effects of trabeculectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma on segmented macular ganglion cell complex alterations. Int. Ophthalmol. 2021, 41, 2249–2263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mendrinos, E.; Mermoud, A.; Shaarawy, T. Nonpenetrating glaucoma surgery. Surv. Ophthalmol. 2008, 53, 592–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chiselita, D. Non-penetrating deep sclerectomy versus trabeculectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma surgery. Eye 2001, 15, 197–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dwivedi, R.; Somerville, T.; Cheeseman, R.; Rogers, C.; Batterbury, M.; Choudhary, A. Deep sclerectomy and trabeculectomy augmented with Mitomycin C: 2-year post-operative outcomes. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2021, 259, 1965–1974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Eldaly, M.A.; Bunce, C.; Elsheikha, O.Z.; Wormald, R. Non-penetrating filtration surgery versus trabeculectomy for open-angle glaucoma. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2014, 2014, CD007059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El Sayyad, F.; Helal, M.; El-Kholify, H.; Khalil, M.; El-Maghraby, A. Nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy versus trabeculectomy in bilateral primary open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2000, 107, 1671–1674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shaarawy, T.; Karlen, M.; Schnyder, C.; Achache, F.; Sanchez, E.; Mermoud, A. Five-year results of deep sclerectomy with collagen implant. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. 2001, 27, 1770–1778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anand, N.; Atherley, C. Deep sclerectomy augmented with mitomycin C. Eye 2005, 19, 442–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lachkar, Y.; Neverauskiene, J.; Jeanteur-Lunel, M.N.; Gracies, H.; Berkani, M.; Ecoffet, M.; Kopel, J.; Kretz, G.; Lavat, P.; Lehrer, M.; et al. Nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy: A 6-year retrospective study. Eur. J. Ophthalmol. 2004, 14, 26–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bissig, A.; Rivier, D.; Zaninetti, M.; Shaarawy, T.; Mermoud, A.; Roy, S. Ten years follow-up after deep sclerectomy with collagen implant. J. Glaucoma 2008, 17, 680–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cillino, S.; Di Pace, F.; Casuccio, A.; Lodato, G. Deep sclerectomy versus punch trabeculectomy: Effect of low-dosage mitomycin C. Ophthalmologica 2005, 219, 281–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Russo, V.; Scott, I.U.; Stella, A.; Balducci, F.; Cosma, A.; Barone, A.; Delle Noci, N. Nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy with reticulated hyaluronic acid implant versus punch trabeculectomy: A prospective clinical trial. Eur. J. Ophthalmol. 2008, 18, 751–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Geevarghese, A.; Wollstein, G.; Ishikawa, H.; Schuman, J.S. Optical Coherence Tomography and Glaucoma. Annu. Rev. Vis. Sci. 2021, 7, 693–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
TE | DS | p = * | |
---|---|---|---|
Number of eyes, n | 104 | 183 | n.a. |
Age, years | 63.5 ± 1.6 | 64.9 ± 1.1 | 0.710 |
Laterality, right/left | 46/58 | 95/88 | 0.126 |
Gender, female/male | 53/51 | 101/82 | 0.285 |
Baseline IOP, mmHg | 23.8 ± 1.4 | 23.1 ± 0.4 | 0.889 |
Number of IOP-lowering medications, n | 3.2 ± 0.2 | 3.3 ± 0.1 | 0.182 |
Visual acuity, logMAR | 0.30 ± 0.02 | 0.34 ± 0.02 | 0.302 |
Visual field mean defect, dB | −11.5 ± 0.9 | −10.5 ± 0.9 | 0.377 |
Mean peripapillary RFNL thickness, μm | 64.4 ± 2.1 | 64.9 ± 1.9 | 0.963 |
TE | p = * | DS | p = * | p = ** | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IOP, mmHg | Baseline | 23.8 ± 1.4 | n.a. | 23.1 ± 0.4 | n.a. | 0.889 |
3 months | 10.8 ± 0.4 | <0.001 | 13.7 ± 0.5 | <0.001 | 0.002 | |
6 months | 11.9 ± 0.4 | <0.001 | 13.2 ± 0.4 | <0.001 | 0.363 | |
12 months | 11.9 ± 1.0 | <0.001 | 14.4 ± 0.5 | <0.001 | 0.009 | |
24 months | 12.9 ± 1.2 | <0.001 | 14.6 ± 0.5 | <0.001 | 0.122 | |
36 months | 13.4 ± 1.4 | <0.001 | 15.4 ± 0.7 | <0.001 | 0.037 | |
Medication, n | Baseline | 3.2 ± 0.2 | n.a. | 3.3 ± 0.1 | n.a. | 0.182 |
3 months | 0.1 ± 0.1 | <0.001 | 0.6 ± 0.1 | <0.001 | 0.142 | |
6 months | 0.4 ± 0.1 | <0.001 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | <0.001 | 0.424 | |
12 months | 0.5 ± 0.1 | <0.001 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | <0.001 | 0.158 | |
24 months | 0.8 ± 0.1 | <0.001 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | <0.001 | 0.024 | |
36 months | 0.9 ± 0.2 | <0.001 | 1.4 ± 0.1 | <0.001 | 0.008 | |
BCVA, logMAR | Baseline | 0.30 ± 0.02 | n.a. | 0.34 ± 0.02 | n.a. | 0.302 |
3 months | 0.38 ± 0.03 | 0.611 | 0.41 ± 0.03 | 0.389 | 0.895 | |
6 months | 0.29 ± 0.02 | 0.487 | 0.36 ± 0.04 | 0.708 | 0.705 | |
12 months | 0.36 ± 0.03 | 0.250 | 0.37 ± 0.04 | 0.120 | 0.135 | |
24 months | 0.37 ± 0.03 | 0.797 | 0.39 ± 0.05 | 0.804 | 0.843 | |
36 months | 0.37 ± 0.04 | 0.204 | 0.41 ± 0.05 | 0.653 | 0.234 |
TE | p = * | DS | p = * | p = ** | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAP mean defect, dB | Baseline | −11.5 ± 0.9 | n.a. | −10.5 ± 0.9 | n.a. | 0.377 |
3 months | −12.3 ± 1.1 | 0.171 | −12.6 ± 1.4 | 0.068 | 0.884 | |
6 months | −11.5 ± 1.0 | 0.255 | −11.1 ± 0.9 | 0.112 | 0.922 | |
12 months | −12.0 ± 1.1 | 0.090 | −11.0 ± 1.0 | 0.302 | 0.915 | |
RNFL thickness, μm | Baseline | 64.4 ± 2.1 | n.a. | 64.9 ± 1.9 | n.a. | 0.963 |
3 months | 64.5 ± 3.3 | 0.163 | 64.6 ± 4.3 | 0.637 | 0.819 | |
6 months | 59.8 ± 3.5 | 0.003 | 58.7 ± 2.7 | 0.052 | 0.829 | |
12 months | 57.2 ± 2.2 | <0.001 | 57.5 ± 3.0 | 0.016 | 0.620 | |
24 months | 57.7 ± 2.6 | <0.001 | 58.6 ± 2.5 | 0.005 | 0.408 | |
36 months | 59.7 ± 3.5 | <0.001 | 58.4 ± 2.1 | <0.001 | 0.841 |
TE | DS | p = * | |
---|---|---|---|
Hyphema | 4 | 0 | 0.008 |
Corneal erosion | 6 | 2 | 0.023 |
Choroidal detachment | 16 | 8 | 0.001 |
Bleb leakage | 6 | 2 | 0.023 |
Flat anterior chamber | 5 | 3 | 0.124 |
Aqueous misdirection syndrome | 2 | 0 | 0.062 |
Hypotonia maculopathy | 3 | 3 | 0.494 |
Suture lysis (total) | 18 | 0 | <0.001 |
Suture lysis (number of eyes) | 15 | 0 | <0.001 |
Goniopuncture | 0 | 31 | <0.001 |
5-FU (total) | 102 | 67 | <0.001 |
5-FU (number of eyes) | 32 | 15 | 0.002 |
Bleb needlings (total) | 14 | 15 | 0.162 |
Bleb needlings (number of eyes) | 12 | 15 | 0.379 |
Anterior chamber reformation | 6 | 2 | 0.149 |
Secondary glaucoma surgery | 14 | 23 | 0.875 |
TE | DS | p = * | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
<21 mmHg | Complete success | 72% | 46% | <0.001 |
Qualified success | 88% | 75% | 0.009 | |
<18 mmHg | Complete success | 72% | 45% | <0.001 |
Qualified success | 86% | 72% | 0.006 | |
<15 mmHg | Complete success | 70% | 40% | <0.001 |
Qualified success | 80% | 62% | 0.002 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Pfeiffer, V.; Gubser, P.A.; Shang, X.; Lincke, J.-B.; Häner, N.U.; Zinkernagel, M.S.; Unterlauft, J.D. Functional and Morphological Outcomes after Trabeculectomy and Deep Sclerectomy—Results from a Monocentric Registry Study. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 101. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14010101
Pfeiffer V, Gubser PA, Shang X, Lincke J-B, Häner NU, Zinkernagel MS, Unterlauft JD. Functional and Morphological Outcomes after Trabeculectomy and Deep Sclerectomy—Results from a Monocentric Registry Study. Diagnostics. 2024; 14(1):101. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14010101
Chicago/Turabian StylePfeiffer, Valentin, Pascal Aurel Gubser, Xiao Shang, Joel-Benjamin Lincke, Nathanael Urs Häner, Martin Sebastian Zinkernagel, and Jan Darius Unterlauft. 2024. "Functional and Morphological Outcomes after Trabeculectomy and Deep Sclerectomy—Results from a Monocentric Registry Study" Diagnostics 14, no. 1: 101. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14010101
APA StylePfeiffer, V., Gubser, P. A., Shang, X., Lincke, J.-B., Häner, N. U., Zinkernagel, M. S., & Unterlauft, J. D. (2024). Functional and Morphological Outcomes after Trabeculectomy and Deep Sclerectomy—Results from a Monocentric Registry Study. Diagnostics, 14(1), 101. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14010101