Next Article in Journal
Characterization of Muscle Weakness Due to Myasthenia Gravis Using Shear Wave Elastography
Next Article in Special Issue
A Systematic Review of the Relationship between Chest CT Severity Score and Laboratory Findings and Clinical Parameters in COVID-19 Pneumonia
Previous Article in Journal
Upraising Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in Critically Ill Patients: A New Enemy?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ultra-Low Dose CT Chest in Acute COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Pilot Study from India
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Longitudinal Chest X-ray Scores and their Relations with Clinical Variables and Outcomes in COVID-19 Patients

Diagnostics 2023, 13(6), 1107; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13061107
by Beiyi Shen 1,†, Wei Hou 2,†, Zhao Jiang 1,†, Haifang Li 1, Adam J. Singer 3, Mahsa Hoshmand-Kochi 1, Almas Abbasi 1, Samantha Glass 1, Henry C. Thode 3, Jeffrey Levsky 4, Michael Lipton 4 and Tim Q. Duong 4,*
Reviewer 1:
Diagnostics 2023, 13(6), 1107; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13061107
Submission received: 15 February 2023 / Revised: 8 March 2023 / Accepted: 13 March 2023 / Published: 15 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Imaging and Chest Diseases)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The detailed comments on the proposed approach are enlisted in the attached document. Although the authors have written a sound and detailed approach, still, some comments are proposed below to improve the quality of the manuscript. 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This paper, “Longitudinal chest X-ray scores and their relations with clinical variables and outcomes in COVID-19 patients”

 My comments are the following:

1.The description of the population under study and the sample with which the ANOVA analysis was made, it was prepared in detail. However, the steps of how the ANOVA analysis was performed is not clear.

2. The analysis of results and the conclusions are very appropriate in accordance with the set goals.

3. The ANOVA analysis was performed using specialized software (IBM SPSS v26). However, I consider it is necessary to include a special section as "Methodology". In where it is explained in detail that specific ANOVA was used (Randomized blocks, Latin squarer, or Factorial designs for example).

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors improved the quality of the paper by incorporating all the reviews 

and suggestions. Therefore, the paper is accepted in its current form.

Back to TopTop