Next Article in Journal
Post-Dilatation of New-Generation Self-Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valves Does Not Increase Atrioventricular Conduction Abnormalities
Next Article in Special Issue
Sepsis Trajectory Prediction Using Privileged Information and Continuous Physiological Signals
Previous Article in Journal
Learning Curve for Ultrasound Assessment of Myometrial Infiltration in Endometrial Cancer Visualizing Videoclips: Potential Implications for Training
Previous Article in Special Issue
An Improved Diagnostic of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis Drug Resistance Status by Applying a Decision Tree to Probabilities Assigned by the CatBoost Multiclassifier of Matrix Metalloproteinases Biomarkers
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Characterization of Anesthesia in Rats from EEG in Terms of Long-Range Correlations

by
Inna A. Blokhina
1,
Alexander A. Koronovskii, Jr.
2,
Alexander V. Dmitrenko
1,
Inna V. Elizarova
1,
Tatyana V. Moiseikina
1,
Matvey A. Tuzhilkin
1,
Oxana V. Semyachkina-Glushkovskaya
1 and
Alexey N. Pavlov
2,3,*
1
Department of Human and Animal Physiology, Saratov State University, Astrakhanskaya Str. 83, Saratov 410012, Russia
2
Physics of Open Systems Department, Saratov State University, Astrakhanskaya Str. 83, Saratov 410012, Russia
3
Regional Scientific and Educational Mathematical Center “Mathematics of Future Technologies”, Saratov 410012, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2023, 13(3), 426; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13030426
Submission received: 25 December 2022 / Revised: 15 January 2023 / Accepted: 20 January 2023 / Published: 24 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Artificial Intelligence in Medical Signal Processing and Analysis)

Abstract

:
Long-range correlations are often used as diagnostic markers in physiological research. Due to the limitations of conventional techniques, their characterizations are typically carried out with alternative approaches, such as the detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA). In our previous works, we found EEG-related markers of the blood–brain barrier (BBB), which limits the penetration of major drugs into the brain. However, anesthetics can penetrate the BBB, affecting its function in a dose-related manner. Here, we study two types of anesthesia widely used in experiments on animals, including zoletil/xylazine and isoflurane in optimal doses not associated with changes in the BBB. Based on DFA, we reveal informative characteristics of the electrical activity of the brain during such doses that are important for controlling the depth of anesthesia in long-term experiments using magnetic resonance imaging, multiphoton microscopy, etc., which are crucial for the interpretation of experimental results. These findings provide an important informative platform for the enhancement and refinement of surgery, since the EEG-based DFA analysis of BBB can easily be used during surgery as a tool for characterizing normal BBB functions under anesthesia.

1. Introduction

Natural systems often exhibit complex dynamics with long-range power–law correlations [1] that can be quantified by a slowly decaying correlation or covariation function. Such quantification is highly important for a deeper understanding of system behavior and the effects of long memory. In particular, it clearly differs from the exponentially decaying correlation function observed in the dynamics of deterministic models producing chaotic oscillation. The presence of power–law statistics is associated with the absence of a specific time scale and with the existence of the self-similarity property (a scale-invariant structure), when a wide range of scales takes part in the global description of the observed dynamics. Physiology in general shows many examples of systems, where power–law statistics (1/f activity) are combined with various rhythmic contributions, and numerous studies have been performed to explain the origin of the 1/f spectrum slope in recorded signals [2,3,4,5,6]. The classical correlation function has at least two restrictions in studying the effects of long memory, such as the difficulty in revealing its law of decay as values tend to zero, and its inapplicability to systems with time-varying parameters producing nonstationary behavior. In this regard, alternative signal processing tools for long-range correlation analyses have been developed, which include R/S analysis [7], different versions of fluctuation analysis [8,9], with the detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA) [10,11] as the most widely used technique, wavelet-based multifractal formalism [12,13], etc. Currently, DFA is a popular approach that has some limitations [14,15,16], but it is a fairly simple tool (compared, e.g., with the multifractal analysis [13]), which can better resolve the range of long-range correlations than the correlation function.
Scale-invariant structures of physiological processes often have distinctions between healthy and pathological states [17,18,19], as well as between various pathological states [20]. Due to this circumstance, a quantitative assessment of long-range correlations provides informative diagnostic measures. This quantification can be provided by the scaling exponent of DFA [10] that has a relation to the exponents describing the decay of the correlation function or the slope of the spectral power. However, in many cases, it is not enough to apply a single (global) quantity to describe correlations over the entire range of available scales. Thus, the paper [11] discusses the different scaling behavior for long-range and short-range correlations in heart rate dynamics. The latter means that the local scaling exponents can outperform the average measure in characterizing signal features. An alternative way is to consider the multifractal concept and quantify the temporal variations of the scale-invariant structure of physiological data sets in terms of a singularity spectrum, which can be estimated using the wavelet-transform modulus maxima method [12] or multifractal DFA [21,22]. Despite these tools providing informative and detailed characterizations of complex scaling in inhomogeneous physiological time series, even the simplest approach dealing with conventional DFA with the introduction of local slopes of fluctuations in the signal profile from a local trend depending on the scale parameter is a useful way for diagnostic-related studies.
Recent studies [23,24,25,26,27,28,29] showed that sleep and BBB openings are two conditions associated with similar activation of the brain’s drainage system. They proposed EEG markers for these states based on several signal processing techniques, including DFA and machine learning tools. In this work, we perform a DFA analysis of anesthesia because the BBB prevents the efficient delivery of major drugs into the central nervous system. However, anesthetics can penetrate the BBB to induce clinical anesthesia. If the optimal dose of anesthesia is applied, the permeability of the BBB is restored immediately after anesthesia is turned off, which is of high clinical relevance. For example, Spieth et al. [30] demonstrated that isoflurane causes a temporary opening of the BBB, and BBB functions were recovered directly after the termination of anesthesia, providing a certain window for drug delivery. The effects of anesthesia on BBB functions are highly dependent on the dose of anesthesia. For example, 1% isoflurane does not affect the BBB, while 2% and 3% induce an increase in the BBB permeability to high and small molecular weight substances [30,31,32,33]. Here, we study EEG characteristics in rats under two types of anesthesia at optimal doses widely used in animal experiments, including zoletil/xylazine (100 mg/kg/10 mg/kg, respectively) and 1% isoflurane, which are not associated with changes in the BBB [30,31]. We aim to develop a new method for EEG control of BBB permeability during surgical procedures and long-term experiments requiring the use of such types of anesthesia (magnetic resonance imaging, multiphoton microscopy, etc.), which is important for interpreting the experimental results. This study is also important for the enhancement and refinement of surgery because EEG-based DFA analysis of BBB can easily be used during surgery as a tool for characterizing normal BBB functions under anesthesia. In general, the effects of anesthesia on the body are widely known. It causes a loss of muscle tone and a related reduction in resting lung volume [34]. It affects the cardiovascular system and can produce a variety of cardiac depression and hemodynamic instability [35]. Anesthesia prevents communication between neurons in distinct areas of the brain [36], and the induced state of unconsciousness by destroyed coordinated neuronal processes in the central nervous system is different from sleep [37].
Here, we discuss how different types of anesthesia are reflected in power–law correlations in the EEG characterized by DFA local scaling exponents. The paper is organized as follows. Section 2 gives a brief description of the method for studying the correlation features of EEG signals and experiments in rats. Section 3 describes the main findings of the effects of anesthesia on the electrical activity of the brain and their discussion for both types of artificial sleep. Section 4 provides a summary of concluding remarks.

2. Methods and Experiments

2.1. Subjects

Experiments were carried out on male Wistar rats (2 months old) in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH Publication no. 85-23, revised 1996) and protocols approved by the Institutional Review Board of Saratov State University (Protocol 9, 26 June 2022). Animals were kept at a temperature of 25 ± 2 °C, humidity at 55%, and a light–dark cycle of 12:12 h. Food and water were given ad libitum. Rats were taken from the vivarium in Pushchino (Russia) one week before the start of the experiments to ensure acclimatization to the housing room. Experiments were performed on two groups of animals: (1) injection anesthesia with zoletil/xylazine (100 mg/kg/10 mg/kg, Virbac Sante Animale, France/NITA-FARM, Russia, respectively), and (2) inhalation anesthesia with 1% isoflurane at 1 L/min N 2 O/O 2 —70:30, (Dexa Medica, USA); n = 7 in each group. The design of experiments included EEG recording for 30–35 min without anesthesia; then the EEG was recorded for the next 30–40 min in the same animals that received anesthesia at the dose recommended for the surgery.

2.2. EEG Recording

Two-channel cortical EEGs [38,39] were recorded (Pinnacle Technology, Taiwan). Two silver electrodes (tip diameter 2–3 μ m) were implanted into the frontal cortex to a depth of 150 μ m in coordinates (L: 2.0 mm and P: 2 mm) from Bregma on either side of the midline under inhalation anesthesia with 1% isoflurane at a dose of 1 L/min N 2 O/O 2 —70:30. The head plate was mounted and small burr holes were drilled. Then, EEG wire leads were inserted into the burr holes on one side of the midline between the skull and underlying dura mater. The EEG leads were fixed with dental acrylic. Ibuprofen (15 mg/kg) to relive postoperative pain was given to them with the water supply two to three days before surgery and for three days after surgery. The rats were given 10 days to recover from the surgery before the start of the experiment.

2.3. DFA

A detrended fluctuation analysis was proposed [10,11] and widely used in various studies [40,41,42,43,44] as an alternative to the conventional correlation analysis of nonstationary processes and signals with a rapidly decreasing correlation function, which complicates the quantification of long-range correlations due to significant computational errors, especially for noisy data. This method represents a version of the root-mean-square analysis of random walks with a local detrending procedure. The DFA includes building a profile of a signal x ( i ) , i = 1 , , N as y ( k ) = i = 1 k x ( i ) . This profile is separated into segments of length n. Depending on the amount of data, segments may or may not overlap. Profile fluctuations from the local trend y n ( k ) are computed and averaged over the entire data set y ( k )
F ( n ) = 1 N k = 1 N y ( k ) y n ( k ) 2 .
where y n ( k ) is fitted within each segment with the least-squares method using linear or nonlinear functions. The computations are carried out for a variable length of the segment n to analyze the power–law dependence
F ( n ) n α .
In the presence of scale-invariant structures, the global quantity α can describe the features of power–law correlations in the signal x ( i ) . In particular, it makes it possible to distinguish between anti-correlations ( α < 0.5 ), uncorrelated behavior ( α = 0.5 ), and positive correlations of various types ( α > 0.5 ). For complex signals produced by physiological systems, distinctions in the correlation features can depend on the scale and, therefore, a number of local scaling exponents can give a more complete description of the dynamics under study.

3. Results and Discussion

The preliminary analysis of the recorded data sets to select an appropriate range of scales for computing the DFA scaling exponent shows nonlinear behavior of F ( n ) on a log-log plot (Figure 1). Although there are visual differences between the two states, namely wakefulness and anesthesia, they are not enough to use a single α -exponent for each state, and its local values become preferable. This circumstance is related to both types of anesthesia. The lg n regions associated with the strongest inter-state distinctions may differ depending on the animal and on the position of the electrode; therefore, it seems appropriate to establish the optimal values of the computational parameters for each record and then consider the statistics for the entire groups of animals. According to Figure 1, these optimal values belong to the region of relatively long-range correlations, and for lg n < 1.8 , the results are very close.
Figure 2 provides a fairly informative representation of computations on a plane (time, range of scales), that clearly shows the structural changes in signals caused by the transition to the anesthesia stage. Note that here we estimate scaling exponents locally, i.e., compute the local slopes of lg F versus lg n within a sliding window lg n of size 0.7. Figure 2 illustrates that despite the distinctions appearing after the implementation of anesthesia, the choice of an appropriate range of scales is of significant importance for diagnostic purposes. In particular, visually more essential differences take place near lg n = 2.8 compared to other values of the lg n , and these distinctions are better identified in Figure 2a.
In addition to visual control of the results, they can be quantified on the basis of statistical tests. In order to compare diagnostic abilities, depending on the type of anesthesia, we estimated t-values of the Student’s t-test for EEG signals related to the two considered physiological conditions. For this purpose, we chose 10 EEG segments of 1 min each for wakefulness and 10 segments related to anesthesia. Figure 3 shows the performed estimates for the same records that were used for the computations given in Figure 1 and Figure 2. These estimates confirm the existence of an optimal lg n value that provides the strongest distinctions between physiological states, and give a range of scales providing reliable diagnostic results (t-values that go beyond the dashed line are associated with significant differences with p < 0.05 ). In the considered examples, the optimal values of lg n are 2.8 (Figure 3a) and 2.9 (Figure 3b). The scale ranges that can be used to diagnose the effects of anesthesia are [1.7, 3.2] (Figure 3a) and [2.4, 3.2] (Figure 3b). Thus, in the examples considered, the first type of anesthesia caused stronger changes in EEG signals with larger t-values quantifying the differences between the states of wakefulness and anesthesia.
The statistical analysis gives the optimal value of lg n equal to 2.6, as the average quantity for all groups of rats and all EEG-channels. Based on this assessment, local α -values related to the two states were compared for each type of anesthesia and EEG channel. The results shown in Figure 4 demonstrate similar distinctions. For both types of anesthesia, a reliable diagnosis of changes in long-range correlations was revealed. During injection anesthesia with zoletil/xylazine, 6 out of 7 animals showed an increase in the local scaling exponent, and the results for both channels were quite similar (Figure 4a,b). In particular, only for the 5th rat, the approach used did not reveal significant inter-state distinctions. For other animals, the changes in α -values significantly exceed the standard deviations of the estimated quantities. During inhalation anesthesia with isoflurane, the results are analogous (Figure 4c,d), namely, in 6 out of 7 rats, strong changes in α are observed when examining the 1st EEG channel (the absence of clear changes takes place only for the 4th rat). In the case of the 2nd EEG channel, a less clear reaction was also observed in the 1st rat.
Note that the diagnostic results given in Figure 4 were obtained by choosing lg n = 2.6 as the optimal (on average) value of the scale parameter. If dealing with individually selected scales associated with the maximum t-value of the Student’s t-test, the separation of states can be improved. Table 1 contains the given estimates including the maximum t-value and the related scale range. For 27 out of 28 EEG signals, it becomes possible to identify changes in correlation features during the transition from wakefulness to anesthesia. Despite both types of anesthesia providing similar diagnostic results, they can nevertheless produce different structural changes in EEG signals. Thus, the first type of anesthesia often causes longer effects, and for the second type, such effects can be shorter.
In addition to the quantitative assessment of differences in steady-state regimes, structural changes in EEG signals were analyzed from transient processes after the administration of anesthesia. Figure 5 illustrates the t-values computed by comparing m = 10 EEG-segments related to the beginning 10 min of the awake state with subsequent data parts in a sliding window approach. Due to the averaging effect, transitions between states in t-values are quite slow. However, the crossing of the dashed line, indicating the critical value t c = 2.228 related to p < 0.05 , occurs close to the time of administration of anesthesia (marked with an arrow). Consideration of a smaller number of EEG segments (e.g., m = 4 in Figure 5) does not essentially improve the identification of the corresponding transition between states.

4. Conclusions

Characterization of long-range correlations is often carried out for physiological systems to provide markers of changes in scale-invariant structures caused by transitions between distinct physiological states. The limitations of the traditional correlation function are the reason for the increased attention to alternative approaches, such as fluctuation analysis and DFA, as special cases. This method also has disadvantages, e.g., associated with a reliable quantitative assessment of signal features in the presence of non-stationarity and a trend without their prior exclusion. The latter can lead to incorrect conclusions about the underlying dynamics. Nevertheless, DFA is a useful approach for many studies, assuming that thorough signal preprocessing is carried out. The complex structure of the experimental time series may require careful data analysis using local scaling exponents that describe signal features in distinct scale ranges. Such type of analysis is performed in the current study by quantifying distinctions in EEG signals during anesthesia depending on the scale parameter and testing for significant changes in local scaling exponents using Student’s t-test.
Our analysis revealed significant distinctions in EEG in the state of wakefulness and anesthesia in terms of correlations in the range of lg n approximately [2.0–3.0]. These distinctions can be detected by choosing fixed algorithmic parameters, but the individual selection of such parameters, taking into account the features of each record, makes it possible to improve the diagnostic capabilities of the method. Thus, the use of two features of the DFA method, namely, local scaling exponents and individual adjustment of algorithmic parameters that maximize Student’s t-values, provided a reliable identification of the effects of anesthesia in 27 out of 28 records. Such identification gives similar results for both types of anesthesia, namely injection and inhalation anesthesia, although the first type often causes prolonged effects in terms of long-range correlations. Consideration of transient processes allows one to correctly detect transitions between states, regardless of the type of anesthesia. These results provide an important informative platform for the enhancement and refinement of surgery since the EEG-based DFA analysis of BBB can easily be used during surgery as a tool for characterizing normal BBB functions under anesthesia.

Author Contributions

The author contributions are as follows: conceptualization, A.N.P. and O.V.S.-G.; methodology, A.N.P.; data curation, I.A.B.; software, A.A.K.J.; formal analysis, I.A.B. and A.A.K.J.; investigation, A.V.D., I.V.E., T.V.M. and M.A.T.; writing—original draft preparation, I.A.B., A.N.P. and O.V.S.-G.; writing—review and editing, A.N.P. and O.V.S.-G.; visualization, A.A.K.J.; supervision, A.N.P. and O.V.S.-G.; project administration, O.V.S.-G.; funding acquisition, O.V.S.-G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (agreement 19-12-00037) regarding the theoretical and numerical studies. Physiological experiments were carried out within the framework of the grant from the Government of the Russian Federation, no. 075-15-2022-1094.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was carried out in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (8th ed., The National Academies Press, Washington, 2011), and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Saratov State University (Protocol No. 9, 26 June 2022).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
BBBblood–brain barrier
DFAdetrended fluctuation analysis
EEGelectroencephalogram

References

  1. Rangarajan, G.; Ding, M. (Eds.) Processes with Long-Range Correlations: Theory and Applications, 1st ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  2. Pilgram, B.; Kaplan, D.T. Nonstationarity and 1/f noise characteristics in heart rate. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 1999, 276, R1–R9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ward, L.M. Dynamical Cognitive Science, 1st ed.; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  4. Wen, H.; Liu, Z. Separating fractal and oscillatory components in the power spectrum of neurophysiological signal. Brain Topogr. 2016, 29, 13–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Dave, S.; Brothers, T.A.; Swaab, T.Y. 1/f neural noise and electrophysiological indices of contextual prediction in aging. Brain Res. 2018, 1691, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Colley, I.D.; Dean, R.T. Origins of 1/f noise in human music performance from short-range autocorrelations related to rhythmic structures. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0216088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Hurst, H.E. Long-term storage capacity of reservoirs. Trans. Am. Soc. Civil Eng. 1951, 116, 770–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Peng, C.-K.; Buldyrev, S.V.; Goldberger, A.L.; Havlin, S.; Sciortino, F.; Simons, M.; Stanley, H.E. Long-range correlations in nucleotide sequences. Nature 1992, 356, 168–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shao, Y.H.; Gu, G.F.; Jiang, Z.Q.; Zhou, W.X.; Sornette, D. Comparing the performance of FA, DFA and DMA using different synthetic long-range correlated time series. Sci. Rep. 2012, 2, 835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Peng, C.-K.; Buldyrev, S.V.; Havlin, S.; Simons, M.; Stanley, H.E.; Goldberger, A.L. Mosaic organization of DNA nucleotides. Phys. Rev. E 1994, 49, 1685–1689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Peng, C.-K.; Havlin, S.; Stanley, H.E.; Goldberger, A.L. Quantification of scaling exponents and crossover phenomena in nonstationary heartbeat time series. Chaos 1995, 5, 82–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Muzy, J.F.; Bacry, E.; Arneodo, A. Wavelets and multifractal formalism for singular signals: Applications to turbulence data. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1991, 67, 3515–3518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Muzy, J.F.; Bacry, E.; Arneodo, A. The multifractal formalism revisited with wavelets. Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos 1994, 4, 245–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hu, K.; Ivanov, P.C.; Chen, Z.; Carpena, P.; Stanley, H.E. Effect of trends on detrended fluctuation analysis. Phys. Rev. E 2001, 64, 011114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Chen, Z.; Ivanov, P.C.; Hu, K.; Stanley, H.E. Effect of nonstationarities on detrended fluctuation analysis. Phys. Rev. E 2002, 65, 041107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Bryce, R.M.; Sprague, K.B. Revisiting detrended fluctuation analysis. Sci. Rep. 2012, 2, 315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Ivanov, P.C.; Amaral, L.A.N.; Goldberger, A.L.; Havlin, S.; Rosenblum, M.G.; Struzik, Z.; Stanley, H. Multifractality in human heartbeat dynamics. Nature 1999, 399, 461–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Zheng, Y.; Gao, J.B.; Sanchez, J.C.; Principe, J.C.; Okun, M.S. Multiplicative multifractal modeling and discrimination of human neuronal activity. Phys. Lett. A 2005, 344, 253–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hausdorff, J.M. Gait dynamics, fractals and falls: Finding meaning in the stride-to-stride fluctuations of human walking. Hum. Mov. Sci. 2007, 26, 555–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Wang, G.; Huang, H.; Xie, H.; Wang, Z.; Hu, X. Multifractal analysis of ventricular fibrillation and ventricular tachycardia. Med. Eng. Phys. 2007, 29, 375–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Kantelhardt, J.W.; Zschiegner, S.A.; Koscielny-Bunde, E.; Havlin, S.; Bunde, A.; Stanley, H.E. Multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis of nonstationary time series. Phys. A 2002, 316, 87–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Ihlen, E.A.F. Introduction to multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis in Matlab. Front. Physiol. 2012, 3, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Pavlov, A.N.; Khorovodov, A.P.; Mamedova, A.T.; Koronovskii, A.A., Jr.; Pavlova, O.N.; Semyachkina-Glushkovskaya, O.V.; Kurths, J. Changes in blood-brain barrier permeability characterized from electroencephalograms with a combined wavelet and fluctuation analysis. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 2021, 136, 577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pavlov, A.N.; Pavlova, O.N.; Semyachkina-Glushkovskaya, O.V.; Kurths, J. Extended detrended fluctuation analysis: Effects of nonstationarity and application to sleep data. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 2021, 136, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Pavlov, A.N.; Dubrovskii, A.I.; Pavlova, O.N.; Semyachkina-Glushkovskaya, O.V. Effects of sleep deprivation on the brain electrical activity in mice. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Runnova, A.; Zhuravlev, M.; Ukolov, R.; Blokhina, I.; Dubrovski, A.; Lezhnev, N.; Sitnikova, E.; Saranceva, E.; Kiselev, A.; Karavaev, A.; et al. Modified wavelet analysis of ECoG-pattern as promising tool for detection of the blood-brain barrier leakage. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 18505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Semenova, N.; Sergeev, K.; Slepnev, A.; Runnova, A.; Zhuravlev, M.; Blokhina, I.; Dubrovsky, A.; Klimova, M.; Terskov, A.; Semyachkina-Glushkovskaya, O.; et al. Blood-brain barrier permeability changes: Nonlinear analysis of ECoG based on wavelet and machine learning approaches. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 2021, 136, 736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Semyachkina-Glushkovskaya, O.; Khorovodov, A.; Fedosov, I.; Pavlov, A.; Shirokov, A.; Sharif, A.E.; Dubrovsky, A.; Blokhina, I.; Terskov, A.; Navolokin, N.; et al. A novel method to stimulate lymphatic clearance of beta-amyloid from mouse brain using noninvasive music-induced opening of the blood-brain barrier with EEG markers. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 10287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Semyachkina-Glushkovskaya, O.V.; Karavaev, A.S.; Prokhorov, M.D.; Runnova, A.E.; Borovkova, E.I.; Ishbulatov, Y.M.; Hramkov, A.N.; Kulminskiy, D.D.; Semenova, N.I.; Sergeev, K.S.; et al. EEG biomarkers of activation of the lymphatic drainage system of the brain during sleep and opening of the blood-brain barrier. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2023, 21, 758–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Spieth, L.; Berghoff, S.A.; Stumpf, S.K.; Winchenbach, J.; Michaelis, T.; Watanabe, T.; Gerndt, N.; Düking, T.; Hofer, S.; Ruhwedel, T.; et al. Anesthesia triggers drug delivery to experimental glioma in mice by hijacking caveolar transport. Neuro-Oncol. Adv. 2021, 3, vdab140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yang, X.; Chen, X. The crosstalk between the blood-brain barrier dysfunction and neuroinflammation after general anaesthesia. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2022, 44, 5700–5717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yang, S.; Gu, C.; Mandeville, E.T.; Dong, Y.; Esposito, E.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, G.; Shen, Y.; Fu, X.; Lo, E.H.; et al. Anesthesia and surgery impair blood-brain barrier and cognitive function in mice. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Tétrault, S.; Chever, O.; Sik, A.; Amzica, F. Opening of the blood-brain barrier during isoflurane anaesthesia. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28, 1330–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Hedenstierna, G.; Edmark, L. Effects of anesthesia on the respiratory system. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Anaesthesiol. 2015, 29, 273–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Barker, S.J.; Gamel, D.M.; Tremper, K.K. Cardiovascular effects of anesthesia and operation. Crit. Care Clin. 1987, 3, 251–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Hao, X.; Ou, M.; Zhang, D.; Zhao, W.; Yang, Y.; Liu, J.; Yang, H.; Zhu, T.; Li, Y.; Zhou, C. The effects of general anesthetics on synaptic transmission. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2020, 18, 936–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Riehl, J.R.; Palanca, B.J.; Ching, S. High-energy brain dynamics during anesthesia-induced unconsciousness. Netw. Neurosci. 2017, 1, 431–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Cohen, M.X. Analyzing Neural Time Series Data: Theory and Practice, 1st ed.; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  39. Schomer, D.L.; Lopes da Silva, F.H. (Eds.) Niedermeyer’s Electroencephalography: Basic Principles, Clinical Applications, and Related Fields, 7th ed.; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  40. Stanley, H.E.; Amaral, L.A.N.; Goldberger, A.L.; Havlin, S.; Ivanov, P.C.; Peng, C.-K. Statistical physics and physiology: Monofractal and multifractal approaches. Phys. A 1999, 270, 309–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Heneghan, C.; McDarby, G. Establishing the relation between detrended fluctuation analysis and power spectral density analysis for stochastic processes. Phys. Rev. E 2000, 62, 6103–6110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Talkner, P.; Weber, R.O. Power spectrum and detrended fluctuation analysis: Application to daily temperatures. Phys. Rev. E 2000, 62, 150–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Frolov, N.S.; Grubov, V.V.; Maksimenko, V.A.; Lüttjohann, A.; Makarov, V.V.; Pavlov, A.N.; Sitnikova, E.; Pisarchik, A.N.; Kurths, J.; Hramov, A.E. Statistical properties and predictability of extreme epileptic events. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 7243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Pavlov, A.N.; Pitsik, E.N.; Frolov, N.S.; Badarin, A.; Pavlova, O.N.; Hramov, A.E. Age-related distinctions in EEG signals during execution of motor tasks characterized in terms of long-range correlations. Sensors 2020, 20, 5843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Examples of nonlinear behavior of F ( n ) on a log–log plot for injection (a) and inhalation (b) anesthesia. Insets show fragments of the original EEG signal from each condition.
Figure 1. Examples of nonlinear behavior of F ( n ) on a log–log plot for injection (a) and inhalation (b) anesthesia. Insets show fragments of the original EEG signal from each condition.
Diagnostics 13 00426 g001
Figure 2. Examples of computations of local scaling exponents on a plane (time, range of scales) for injection (a) and inhalation (b) anesthesia. The arrows indicate when the anesthesia injection or inhalation started.
Figure 2. Examples of computations of local scaling exponents on a plane (time, range of scales) for injection (a) and inhalation (b) anesthesia. The arrows indicate when the anesthesia injection or inhalation started.
Diagnostics 13 00426 g002
Figure 3. Estimates of t-values of the Student’s t-test for EEG signals for injection (a) and inhalation (b) anesthesia.
Figure 3. Estimates of t-values of the Student’s t-test for EEG signals for injection (a) and inhalation (b) anesthesia.
Diagnostics 13 00426 g003
Figure 4. Local α -values for groups of animals for injection (a,b) and inhalation (c,d) anesthesia. Results are shown for the 1st (a,c) and 2nd (b,d) EEG channels.
Figure 4. Local α -values for groups of animals for injection (a,b) and inhalation (c,d) anesthesia. Results are shown for the 1st (a,c) and 2nd (b,d) EEG channels.
Diagnostics 13 00426 g004
Figure 5. Examples of the t-values estimated by comparing m beginning 1-min EEG-segments with subsequent segments in a sliding window approach. The time of administration of anesthesia is marked with an arrow. Results are shown for injection (a) and inhalation (b) anesthesia. The dashed line indicates the critical value t c = 2.228 associated with p < 0.05.
Figure 5. Examples of the t-values estimated by comparing m beginning 1-min EEG-segments with subsequent segments in a sliding window approach. The time of administration of anesthesia is marked with an arrow. Results are shown for injection (a) and inhalation (b) anesthesia. The dashed line indicates the critical value t c = 2.228 associated with p < 0.05.
Diagnostics 13 00426 g005
Table 1. The maximum t-value and the optimal scale range for individual records and both types of anesthesia.
Table 1. The maximum t-value and the optimal scale range for individual records and both types of anesthesia.
Rat NumberEEG-ChannelMaximum t-ValueOptimal lg n
Injection anesthesia
113.413.4
23.852.5
217.142.6
24.272.0
316.472.8
23.612.0
414.762.7
26.492.4
512.243.1
22.313.1
614.672.7
26.862.3
715.292.9
24.722.9
Inhalation anesthesia
114.162.1
23.782.0
213.222.6
25.562.5
313.522.8
22.542.6
412.682.3
21.462.9
516.943.0
25.582.9
615.242.7
24.042.7
715.402.8
26.272.9
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Blokhina, I.A.; Koronovskii, A.A., Jr.; Dmitrenko, A.V.; Elizarova, I.V.; Moiseikina, T.V.; Tuzhilkin, M.A.; Semyachkina-Glushkovskaya, O.V.; Pavlov, A.N. Characterization of Anesthesia in Rats from EEG in Terms of Long-Range Correlations. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 426. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13030426

AMA Style

Blokhina IA, Koronovskii AA Jr., Dmitrenko AV, Elizarova IV, Moiseikina TV, Tuzhilkin MA, Semyachkina-Glushkovskaya OV, Pavlov AN. Characterization of Anesthesia in Rats from EEG in Terms of Long-Range Correlations. Diagnostics. 2023; 13(3):426. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13030426

Chicago/Turabian Style

Blokhina, Inna A., Alexander A. Koronovskii, Jr., Alexander V. Dmitrenko, Inna V. Elizarova, Tatyana V. Moiseikina, Matvey A. Tuzhilkin, Oxana V. Semyachkina-Glushkovskaya, and Alexey N. Pavlov. 2023. "Characterization of Anesthesia in Rats from EEG in Terms of Long-Range Correlations" Diagnostics 13, no. 3: 426. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13030426

APA Style

Blokhina, I. A., Koronovskii, A. A., Jr., Dmitrenko, A. V., Elizarova, I. V., Moiseikina, T. V., Tuzhilkin, M. A., Semyachkina-Glushkovskaya, O. V., & Pavlov, A. N. (2023). Characterization of Anesthesia in Rats from EEG in Terms of Long-Range Correlations. Diagnostics, 13(3), 426. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13030426

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop