Next Article in Journal
Community-Acquired Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Hospitals: Age-Specificity and Potential Zoonotic–Zooanthroponotic Transmission Dynamics
Previous Article in Journal
The Utilization of Machine Learning Algorithms for Assisting Physicians in the Diagnosis of Diabetes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Comparison of Bone Marrow Morphology and Peripheral Blood Findings in Low and High Level JAK2 V617F Allele Burden

1
Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia
2
Laboratory for Molecular Pathology, Clinical Department of Pathology and Cytology, Clinical Hospital Center Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia
3
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Clinical Hospital Center Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia
4
Department of Internal Medicine, Clinic for Gastroenterology, Clinical Hospital Center Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia
5
Department of Internal Medicine, Clinic for Hematology, Clinical Hospital Center Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2023, 13(12), 2086; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13122086
Submission received: 24 May 2023 / Revised: 11 June 2023 / Accepted: 14 June 2023 / Published: 16 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics)

Abstract

:
Cases with low level JAK2 V617F mutations are increasingly detected; however, the clinical interpretation of the low allele JAK2 burden may be challenging. The aim of this study is to analyze and compare the bone marrow morphology and peripheral blood findings in the low level JAK2 V617F allele burden (≤15% of JAK2) and high JAK2 V617F mutation burden patients (>15% JAK2). In total, 122 JAK2 V617F positive cases with concomitant bone marrow biopsies and peripheral blood findings were re-evaluated (62 low and 60 high level JAK2 V617F positive). Within the low burden group, normal looking megakaryocytes (p = 0.0005) were more frequently found, compared with those with no atypia (p = 0.0003), their number was more frequently not increased (p = 0.009), and they did not form clusters (p = 0.001). We found statistically significant difference in the number of platelet (p = 0.0003) and hematocrit levels (p = 0.032) when comparing the JAK2 V617F <3% and ≥3% mutation burden. In the high-level burden, the megakaryocytes were more frequently atypical (p = 0.054), and more frequently formed clusters (p = 0.053) with nuclei with maturation defects (p ≤ 0.0001). In conclusion, the JAK2 V617F mutation burden is reflected by morphological changes in the bone marrow and careful follow up of each and every patient with a low JAK2 V617F positivity is mandatory.

1. Introduction

Philadelphia chromosome negative (Ph-) myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) include polycythaemia (PV), essential thrombocytosis (ET), and primary myelofibrosis (PMF). Somatic mutation V617F in Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) is the main known diagnostic marker for Ph-MPN resulting in excessive proliferation of one or more myeloid cells [1]. The JAK2 V617F mutation can be found in more than 95% of patients with PV and 50–60% of patients with ET or PMF [2]. In patients with JAK2 V617F mutations and allele burden above 50%, there is a higher risk of thrombosis, both in PV and ET [3,4]. On the other hand, studies show that a low JAK2 V617 allele burden in PMF is linked with statistically significant shorter survival and shorter intervals without progression into acute leukemia [5,6]. The JAK2 mutation has become a diagnostic standard, and the level of allele burden is part of a usual diagnostic work up, although the World Health Organization (WHO) does not specify the reference value for setting the diagnosis of MPN [7]. Because of the use of allele-specific real time PCR (AS-PCR) with high analytical sensitivity, cases with a low level JAK2 V617F mutation are increasingly detected; however, the clinical interpretation of the low allele burden of JAK2 mutation cases may be challenging [8]. Previous studies have shown that a small amount of JAK2 V617F clone cannot represent sufficient evidence to establish malignant myeloproliferation because clonal hematopoiesis can be present in healthy individuals as well [9]. It is known that 0.03–1% of JAK2 V617F mutations can also be found in the adult, healthy population [10,11]. The prognostic significance of JAK2 V617F mutation quantification, as well as the correlation with patient’s clinical characteristics, is not yet fully clarified [12]. Some studies have shown that the burden of JAK2 V617F alleles can correlate with the phenotypic presentation of MPN [13], severity of the disease phenotype [14], risk of thrombotic events [15], progression to post-PV myelofibrosis, and survival [6,16]. A rare subgroup of patients presenting with splenic vein thrombosis (SVT) frequently present normal or near normal blood counts with small amounts of JAK2 V617F clone detectable [17]. However, the risk of thrombosis has been shown to increase with the percentage of mutant allele burden and the type of MPN [18]. The JAK2 V617F mutation is detectable in individuals with clonal haematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) and despite normal blood counts, these individuals have a significantly increased risk of cardiovascular disease [19]. Studies imply that when a low positivity of JAK2 V617F is encountered there is no difference in mutant allele burden and patient characteristics between known MPN cases and reactive cases [20]. In addition, it has also been found that patients with a low-level mutation (JAK2 V617F < 12%) also had an increased frequency of co-existing mutations in the exon 12 JAK2 and exon 10 MPL genes [21]. Therefore, Wu et al. concluded that in the case of <5% JAK2 V617F mutations, a low positive result should be reported along with a recommendation for the correlation with the clinical history and bone marrow biopsy findings [20]. This finding is in favor of studies that have shown that bone marrow biopsy, when performed, was diagnostic of full-blown disease, regardless of JAK2 V617F allele burden [7]. Therefore, the aim of this study is to characterize and analyze the bone marrow morphology and peripheral blood findings in the low level JAK2 V617F allele burden patients and compare it to the morphology and blood findings of the high JAK2 V617F mutation burden patients.

2. Materials and Methods

This retrospective study included a total of 122 cases referred to the Department of Haematology and to the Clinical Department of Pathology and Cytology, Clinical Hospital Center Rijeka (Rijeka, Croatia), during January 2015 to January 2019. Only cases with available bone marrow biopsy and concomitant results of JAK2 AS-PCR assay were included. The patients were divided into the low level JAK2 V617F allele burden group (≤15% of JAK2) and high JAK2 V617F mutation burden group (>15% JAK2) with follow up bone marrow biopsy and peripheral blood taken at the time of diagnosis or at the time of JAK2 V617F positivity for comparison. We used 15% as the threshold because the literature states that full blown MPN disease in bone marrow histology is usually 10% and more, so to have substantial number of samples for comparison in our study group, we found 15% JAK2 positivity to be the optimal cut off level of allele burden. The morphological findings of the bone marrow biopsy were re-evaluated at the Clinical Department of Pathology and Cytology, Clinical Hospital Center Rijeka, by two pathologists. A review of the patients’ electronic medical records was performed to collect the complete blood count (CBC) data and clinical characteristics at the time of diagnosis. The patient diagnoses were made locally based on a multidisciplinary integrated review of their clinical, laboratory, and histopathological findings according to the current World Health Organisation (WHO) Classification criteria (2008 or 2016). All of the patients provided written informed consent at the time of clinical work-up and all procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards and the Helsinki Declaration. In addition, the study was approved by the Ethics Committees of the Clinical Hospital Center Rijeka and the Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka. The general characteristics of the patients are shown in Table 1.

2.1. Bone Marrow Biopsy Evaluation

Bone marrow specimens were routinely formalin fixed; decalcified; embedded in paraffin; and stained with H&E, periodic acid-Schiff, Giemsa, Prussian blue, and Gomori to evaluate the morphology and reticulin fiber content. The bone marrow slides were independently evaluated by two pathologists and the following morphologic features were assessed: cellularity, adipocyte percentage and spatial distribution (near trabeculae, diffuse intertarbecular or combination of both), erythroid precursor cells morphology (normoblastic or megaloblastic), myeloid-erythroid ratio (M:E) (reduced, normal, or elevated), reticulin fiber content, and megakaryocyte morphologic features. Cellularity was approximately assessed paralleling an age-associated reduction in the percentage of hematopoietic cells relative to marrow fat [22]. Myelofibrosis was graded on the scale of 0 to 3 according to the European consensus on grading bone marrow fibrosis and the assessment of cellularity [22,23,24]. Megakaryocyte morphologic features (spatial distribution, clustering, morphology, and lobulation of nuclei) were scored for each case using an arbitrary threshold of at least 10% within the cells of a lineage, as described earlier [25]. The bone marrow morphological characteristics and CBC findings were compared between low (<15% of JAK2 V617F mutation) and high (≥15% of JAK2 V617F mutation) level allele burden. Furthermore, the low level JAK2 V617F allele burden group was further subclassified into <3% and ≥3% JAK2 V617F allele burden groups, and subsequently the morphological and CBC finding were compared.

2.2. DNA Isolation and JAK2 V617F Mutation Analysis

The DNA was isolated from the whole blood samples using a Macherey Nagel blood kit (Macherey-Nagel, Duren, Germany) according to the manufacturer protocol. The yield and the quality of isolated DNA was determined using Qubit 3.0 (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA). The JAK2 V617F mutation level was evaluated using the ipsogen®JAK2 MutaQuant®Kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany), using quantitative, real-time AS-PCR with the cobas z480 system (Roche Diagnostics, Rotkreuz, Switzerland). The percentage of mutant JAK2 V617F allele was expressed as the ratio of JAK2 V617F copies to the total copy number (CN) of JAK2[CN of JAK2 V617F/(CN of JAK2 V617F +CN of JAK2 wild type)] × 100. The cut-off values and interpretation of results were set by the kit’s manufacturer as follows: JAK2 V617F ≤ 0.014% mutation means not detected, JAK2 V617F > 0.014% but <0.091% means an inconclusive result (grey zone), and JAK2 V617F ≥ 0.091% means a positive result and mutation has been detected.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using MedCalc for Windows, version 20.116 (MedCalc Statistical Software bvba, Ostend, Belgium). Classical methods of descriptive statistics were used, continuous variables were presented as the median and range, and categorical variables were presented as the number of cases and percentage. Differences of continuous variables between analyzed group of patients were done using the Mann–Whitney U test. Differences between categorical variables were done using Fisher’s exact test and the χ2 test. p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Diagnoses within Low and High JAK2 V617F Allele Burden Groups

Within the high allele burden group, there was 60 patients in total and the most frequent diagnosis was PV (51.7%), followed by ET (20%) and PMF (18.3%). The bone marrow histology was in the high allele burden group in all cases indicative of MPN. In the low allele burden group, there were 62 patients and the most frequent diagnosis was ET (51.6%) followed by PV (24.2%), unclassified MPN (11.3%), and PMF (which was the lowest in occurrence). Within this group, there was one patient that could be classified as CHIP and three patients had <3% JAK2 V617F allele burden but did not have MPN, while one patient was diagnosed with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). The CHIP patient had 2.04% JAK2 V617F positivity and did not have the abnormal findings in the bone marrow or overt abnormality of CBC. This patient was 75 years old at the time of diagnosis and was lost from the follow up. In addition, the median of JAK2 V617F allele burden in the low positive group (JAK2 V617F ≤ 15%) was 7.18% (range 0.019–15%) and in the high positive group (JAK2 V617F > 15%) it was 37.75 (range 15.55–94%) (Table 2).

3.2. Comparison of the Bone Marrow Morphology and Peripheral Blood Findings in the Low Level and High Level JAK2 V617F Allele Burden Groups

When comparing the age at diagnosis between the low and high JAK2 positive groups, there was statistically significantly more patients over 60 years of age in the high JAK2 group (p = 0.007). In addition, when comparing the grade of myelofibrosis between these two groups, there was a slight increase in the frequency of patients with some form of fibrosis in the high positive JAK2 group and the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.023). Normocellular bone marrow was statistically significantly more frequently found in the low positive JAK2 group than in the high positive JAK2 group, where we found hypercellular bone marrow more frequently (p = 0.005). As a reflection of differences found in the cellularity between these two groups, the proportion of adipocyte was frequently lower in the high JAK2 positive groups (p = 0.009). An increased ratio of myeloid cells was statistically significantly more frequently found in the high JAK2 positive group (p = 0.0012).
The difference in the megakaryocyte clustering and megakaryocyte atypia between the two groups was at the level of statistical trend (p = 0.053 and p = 0.054, respectively), but we found megakaryocytes forming clusters much less and megakaryocytes with no atypia even less frequently in the low JAK2 positive group. There was no statistical difference between the low and high JAK2 groups when we compared the number of megakaryocytes and the erythroid to myeloid cell number ratio. What we found was that there were statistically significantly more frequently staghorn megakaryocytes in the low JAK2 group, while in the high JAK2 group, there were more frequently megakaryocytes with a nuclear maturation defect (p < 0.0001). When comparing the peripheral blood findings, the statistically significant difference was found in the erythrocyte count and hematocrit level (p = 0.0057 and p = 0.048, respectively), while the hemoglobin, leucocyte, and platelet count did not show a statistically significant difference between these two groups (Table 3). In addition, in the <3% JAK2 positive group, we found 11 patients that had less than 1% of mutation burden and 6 patients had normal bone marrow histology. The main characteristic of patients with <3% JAK2 allele burden are shown in Table 4.

3.3. Comparison of the Bone Marrow Morphology and Peripheral Blood Findings within the Low Level JAK2 V617F Allele Burden Group

When comparing the age, there was no statistically significant difference within the low level JAK2 V617F allele burden group (<3% and ≥3%, but ≤15% in the allele group). In this group, the statistically significant difference was seen when looking the number of megakaryocytes (p = 0.009), and in the patient group with <3%JAK2 V617F, more frequently their count was normal compared with the patients who had >3% mutation burden. In addition, megakaryocyte clustering was much more frequently seen in the ≥3% but <15% allele group (p = 0.001).
When comparing the megakaryocyte nuclear morphology there was much more normal looking megakaryocyte nuclei in the <3% allele group, while staghorn looking nuclei were more frequently seen in the ≥3% but <15% allele group (p = 0.0005) (Figure 1). In addition, the megakaryocyte nuclear atypia was more frequently found when the JAK2 V617F mutation burden was higher than 3% (p = 0.0003). In the comparison of peripheral blood findings, there was a statistically significant difference between two groups when the platelet count and hematocrit level were compared (p = 0.0003 and p = 0.032, respectively), while the hemoglobin was at the level of statistical trend (p = 0.058). The erythrocyte and leucocyte count did not show statistically significant difference between these two groups (Table 5).
In all of the examined groups, we did not find statistically significant associations between the JAK2 V617F mutation burden and thrombotic events (data not shown).

4. Discussion

After the introduction of sensitive assays, such as AS-PCR, low level JAK2 V617F mutation burden cases were more frequently detected. Studies indicate that majority of cases with MPN have an overt positivity (>10%) of JAK2 V617F mutation, while in healthy individuals the mutational load is typically <1% of JAK2 V617F, with rare exemptional cases [20]. The detection of JAK2 V617F is not sufficient for a diagnosis of Ph-MPN, so the clinical interpretation of low level JAK2 V617F allelic burden is challenging. In this study, the majority of patients in the high level JAK2 V617F (>15% JAK2) positive group were diagnosed with PV, while in the low level JAK2 V617F positive group (≤15% of JAK2), the most frequent MPN was ET (Table 2). These findings are in agreement with the study of Nielsen et al., who showed that the JAK2 V617F mutation burden level was associated with MPN disease development and progression rate, consistent with a biological continuum of increasing the JAK2 V617F allele burden across the growing severity of myeloproliferative neoplasm from no disease through ET and PV to PMF [26]. In this study, within the low allelic burden group, normal looking megakaryocytes were more frequently found, compared with no atypia, their number was more frequently not increased, and they did not form clusters. These findings indicate that in the portion of low positive JAK2 V617F cases, the bone marrow morphology will be normal. This might be either be because the patient’s bone marrow biopsy was taken at the early stage of disease or the patient had a mild form of disease with only minor histological features that were insufficient to confirm MPN. Considering that bone marrow biopsy is an aggressive diagnostic procedure, in the low JAK2 V617F mutation burden patients, the more appropriate approach for the patient diagnostic workup would be to order a complete blood count (CBC), LDH, and abdominal ultrasound, and after 12 months to re-test the JAK2 V617F mutation status. Therefore, the management of low positive JAK2 V617F patients needs to be individualized based on their age, other comorbidities, having risk factors for thrombosis, etc. In this study, within the low-level mutation burden group (<3% of JAK2 V617F), we found one case of CHIP and three patients did not have MPN. Perricone et al. suggested that a cut-off of ≥0.8% JAK2 V617F allele burden is very indicative for the presence of MPN and that monitoring the JAK2 mutation burden over time is a convenient way to assess clonal hematopoiesis expansion [7]. However, some studies have shown that JAK2 V617F allele burden can be present and can increase in individuals with no evidence of MPN [9]. However, Nielsen et al. suggested a 2% cut-off value for disease versus no disease for JAK2 V617F positive individuals [26]. In addition, some found that the ≥2% cut-off for JAK2 V617F allele burden was of clinical interest as such patients were more likely to present with splenomegaly and evolve towards MPN within first year of follow up [27]. However, even individuals with a JAK2 V617F mutation burden below 2% should receive medical attention as in time, many of them will develop a myeloproliferative neoplasm indicating the presence of a latent form of Ph-MPN [26]. Therefore, a careful follow up of every patient with a low positive JAK2 V617F mutation allele burden is mandatory, especially if bone marrow histology does not confirm MPN diagnosis. There is substantial doubt about the prognosis in JAK2 V617F positive individuals without evident signs of myeloproliferative disease. CHIP belongs to a spectrum of hematological pre-malignant states and is associated with the development of various hematological malignancies; however, most carriers do not develop malignancy and the progression rate is approximately 0.5–1% per year [28,29]. In general, the population with CHIP have a 40% higher mortality than those without CHIP, and this is reflected by striking excess of cardiovascular events [30]. Some authors have also suggested that testing for latent MPN should be performed in cases of cerebral vein thrombosis [31]. It has been shown that risk of thrombosis increases with the percentage of mutant allele burden and the type of MPN [27]. In this study, there was statistically significant difference in the number of platelet and hematocrit level when comparing two JAK2 V617F mutation burden groups, <3% and ≥3%. In the high-level allelic burden (when the cut-off for comparison was ≥3% and >15%), the megakaryocytes were more frequently atypical, more frequently forming clusters with the nuclei having a maturation defect. These findings indicate that the JAK2 mutation burden is reflected by morphologic changes in the bone marrow, mostly found within the megakaryocytes.
In this study, we found one patient within the low level JAK2 V617F group that could classify as CHIP, indicating that CHIP does exist (and as studies indicate it may be linked to significant morbidity). However, we also found 11 cases of JAK2 V617 mutation burden below 1% and 3 of them did not have MPN. Taking into account that thrombosis is the main cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with JAK2 V617 MPN, the clinically relevant cut-off level of JAK2 mutation burden to start prophylactic anticoagulation remains to be determined, i.e., >0% vs. ≥2%. It has been shown that JAK2 inhibitory therapy in MPN has a limited disease modifying potential. Current JAK2 inhibitors are used in the case of intermediate or high-risk PMF in the patients with PV resistance or intolerance to hydroxyurea, while patients with ET did not have an additional benefit [32]. The reduction in the mutant allele burden with JAK2 inhibitory therapy is modest and it has been shown that there might be a clonal evolution progression during treatment, so low JAK2 positive cases certainly will not benefit from it.
In conclusion, the JAK2 V617F mutation burden is reflected by morphological changes in the bone marrow and careful follow up of each and every patient with a low JAK2 V617F positivity is mandatory.

Author Contributions

All of the authors contributed to this research article. Material preparation, conception, and data collection (E.B. and I.H.); statistical analysis (E.B.); data collection, review, and editing (B.M., L.V. and J.B.); histopathological re-evaluation (E.B. and I.H.); review, editing, and patient management (T.V.); and funding acquisition, supervision, and molecular analysis (I.H.). The first draft of the manuscript was written by I.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research and the APC were funded by the University of Rijeka Trust Grant, grant number uniri-biomed-18-242.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and was approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of the University of Rijeka, Faculty of Medicine; uniri-biomed-18-242/January 2019.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Tatjana Turza and Tanja Kovačević, technicians from the Laboratory for Molecular Pathology, Clinical Department of Pathology and Cytology, for their technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. James, C.; Ugo, V.; Le Couedic, J.P.; Staerk, J.; Delhommeau, F.; Lacout, C.; Garcon, L.; Raslova, H.; Berger, R.; Bennaceur-Griscelli, A.; et al. A unique clonal JAK2 mutation leading to constitutive signalling causes polycythaemia vera. Nature 2005, 434, 1144–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Nangalia, J.; Massie, C.E.; Baxter, E.J.; Nice, F.L.; Gundem, G.; Wedge, D.C.; Avezov, E.; Li, J.; Kollmann, K.; Kent, D.G.; et al. Somatic CALR mutations in myeloproliferative neoplasms with nonmutated JAK2. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 369, 2391–2405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Tefferi, A.; Noel, P.; Hanson, C.A. Uses and abuses of JAK2 and MPL mutation tests in myeloproliferative neoplasms a paper from the 2010 William Beaumont hospital symposium on molecular pathology. J. Mol. Diagn. 2011, 13, 461–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Malak, S.; Labopin, M.; Saint-Martin, C.; Bellanne-Chantelot, C.; Najman, A.; French Group of Familial Myeloproliferative Disorders. Long term follow up of 93 families with myeloproliferative neoplasms: Life expectancy and implications of JAK2V617F in the occurrence of complications. Blood Cells Mol. Dis. 2012, 49, 170–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Tefferi, A.; Lasho, T.L.; Huang, J.; Finke, C.; Mesa, R.A.; Li, C.Y.; Wu, W.; Hanson, C.A.; Pardanani, A. Low JAK2V617F allele burden in primary myelofibrosis, compared to either a higher allele burden or unmutated status, is associated with inferior overall and leukemia-free survival. Leukemia 2008, 22, 756–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Guglielmelli, P.; Barosi, G.; Specchia, G.; Rambaldi, A.; Lo Coco, F.; Antonioli, E.; Pieri, L.; Pancrazzi, A.; Ponziani, V.; Delaini, F.; et al. Identification of patients with poorer survival in primary myelofibrosis based on the burden of JAK2V617F mutated allele. Blood 2009, 114, 1477–1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Perricone, M.; Polverelli, N.; Martinelli, G.; Catani, L.; Ottaviani, E.; Zuffa, E.; Franchini, E.; Dizdari, A.; Forte, D.; Sabattini, E.; et al. The relevance of a low JAK2V617F allele burden in clinical practice: A monocentric study. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 37239–37249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Waterhouse, M.; Follo, M.; Pfeifer, D.; von Bubnoff, N.; Duyster, J.; Bertz, H.; Finke, J. Sensitive and accurate quantification of JAK2 V617F mutation in chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms by droplet digital PCR. Ann. Hematol. 2016, 95, 739–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lippert, E.; Mansier, O.; Migeon, M.; Denys, B.; Nilsson, A.; Rosmond, C.; Lode, L.; Ugo, V.; Lascaux, A.; Bellosillo, B.; et al. Clinical and biological characterization of patients with low (0.1–2%) JAK2V617F allele burden at diagnosis. Haematologica 2014, 99, e98–e101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Martinaud, C.; Brisou, P.; Mozziconacci, M.J. Is the JAK2(V617F) mutation detectable in healthy volunteers? Am. J. Hematol. 2010, 85, 287–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sidon, P.; El Housni, H.; Dessars, B.; Heimann, P. The JAK2V617F mutation is detectable at very low level in peripheral blood of healthy donors. Leukemia 2006, 20, 1622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Vannucchi, A.M.; Pieri, L.; Guglielmelli, P. JAK2 Allele Burden in the Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Effects on Phenotype, Prognosis and Change with Treatment. Ther. Adv. Hematol. 2011, 2, 21–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Larsen, T.S.; Pallisgaard, N.; Moller, M.B.; Hasselbalch, H.C. The JAK2 V617F allele burden in essential thrombocythemia, polycythemia vera and primary myelofibrosis--impact on disease phenotype. Eur. J. Haematol. 2007, 79, 508–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Vannucchi, A.M.; Antonioli, E.; Guglielmelli, P.; Pardanani, A.; Tefferi, A. Clinical correlates of JAK2V617F presence or allele burden in myeloproliferative neoplasms: A critical reappraisal. Leukemia 2008, 22, 1299–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Vannucchi, A.M.; Antonioli, E.; Guglielmelli, P.; Rambaldi, A.; Barosi, G.; Marchioli, R.; Marfisi, R.M.; Finazzi, G.; Guerini, V.; Fabris, F.; et al. Clinical profile of homozygous JAK2 617V>F mutation in patients with polycythemia vera or essential thrombocythemia. Blood 2007, 110, 840–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Koren-Michowitz, M.; Landman, J.; Cohen, Y.; Rahimi-Levene, N.; Salomon, O.; Michael, M.; Amariglio, N.; Nagler, A. JAK2V617F allele burden is associated with transformation to myelofibrosis. Leuk. Lymphoma 2012, 53, 2210–2213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. How, J.; Trinkaus, K.M.; Oh, S.T. Distinct clinical, laboratory and molecular features of myeloproliferative neoplasm patients with splanchnic vein thrombosis. Br. J. Haematol. 2018, 183, 310–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Borowczyk, M.; Wojtaszewska, M.; Lewandowski, K.; Gil, L.; Lewandowska, M.; Lehmann-Kopydlowska, A.; Kroll-Balcerzak, R.; Balcerzak, A.; Iwola, M.; Michalak, M.; et al. The JAK2 V617F mutational status and allele burden may be related with the risk of venous thromboembolic events in patients with Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms. Thromb. Res. 2015, 135, 272–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jaiswal, S.; Natarajan, P.; Silver, A.J.; Gibson, C.J.; Bick, A.G.; Shvartz, E.; McConkey, M.; Gupta, N.; Gabriel, S.; Ardissino, D.; et al. Clonal Hematopoiesis and Risk of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 377, 111–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wu, X.; Lee, J.W.; Peker, D.; Spitzer, S.G.; Laser, J.; Reddy, V.V.; Harada, S. Is Low Positive JAK2 V617F Mutation Test Result Clinically Significant? Multi-Institutional Study. Appl. Immunohistochem. Mol. Morphol. 2016, 24, 589–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nussenzveig, R.H.; Pham, H.T.; Perkins, S.L.; Prchal, J.T.; Agarwal, A.M.; Salama, M.E. Increased frequency of co-existing JAK2 exon-12 or MPL exon-10 mutations in patients with low JAK2(V617F) allelic burden. Leuk. Lymphoma. 2016, 57, 1429–1435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Thiele, J.; Kvasnicka, H.M.; Facchetti, F.; Franco, V.; van der Walt, J.; Orazi, A. European consensus on grading bone marrow fibrosis and assessment of cellularity. Haematologica 2005, 90, 1128–1132. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. Swerdlow, S.H.; Campo, E.; Harris, N.L.; Jaffe, E.S.; Pileri, S.A.; Stein, H.; Thiele, J.; Vardiman, J.W. WHO Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues; International Agency for Research on Cancer Lyon: Lyon, France, 2008; Volume 2. [Google Scholar]
  24. Swerdlow, S.H.; Campo, E.; Pileri, S.A.; Harris, N.L.; Stein, H.; Siebert, R.; Advani, R.; Ghielmini, M.; Salles, G.A.; Zelenetz, A.D.; et al. The 2016 revision of the World Health Organization classification of lymphoid neoplasms. Blood 2016, 127, 2375–2390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Koopmans, S.M.; Bot, F.J.; Lam, K.H.; van Marion, A.M.; de Raeve, H.; Hebeda, K.M. Reproducibility of histologic classification in nonfibrotic myeloproliferative neoplasia. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2011, 136, 618–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Nielsen, C.; Bojesen, S.E.; Nordestgaard, B.G.; Kofoed, K.F.; Birgens, H.S. JAK2V617F somatic mutation in the general population: Myeloproliferative neoplasm development and progression rate. Haematologica 2014, 99, 1448–1455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Levraut, M.; Legros, L.; Drappier, C.; Bene, M.C.; Queyrel, V.; Raynaud, S.; Martis, N. Low prevalence of JAK2 V617F mutation in patients with thrombosis and normal blood counts: A retrospective impact study. J. Thromb. Thrombolysis 2020, 50, 995–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mooney, L.; Goodyear, C.S.; Chandra, T.; Kirschner, K.; Copland, M.; Petrie, M.C.; Lang, N.N. Clonal haematopoiesis of indeterminate potential: Intersections between inflammation, vascular disease and heart failure. Clin. Sci. 2021, 135, 991–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Steensma, D.P. Clinical consequences of clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential. Hematol. Am. Soc. Hematol. Educ. Program 2018, 2018, 264–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Jaiswal, S.; Fontanillas, P.; Flannick, J.; Manning, A.; Grauman, P.V.; Mar, B.G.; Lindsley, R.C.; Mermel, C.H.; Burtt, N.; Chavez, A.; et al. Age-related clonal hematopoiesis associated with adverse outcomes. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014, 371, 2488–2498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Delluc, A.; Antic, D.; Lecumberri, R.; Ay, C.; Meyer, G.; Carrier, M. Occult cancer screening in patients with venous thromboembolism: Guidance from the SSC of the ISTH. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2017, 15, 2076–2079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Bader, M.S.; Meyer, S.C. JAK2 in myeloproliferative neoplasms: Still a protagonist. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Megakaryocyte count and morphology within the low level JAK2 burden group. Bone marrow histology, in the case of the high JAK2 allele burden, always confirmed the MPN diagnosis, but in the case of a low allele burden (<3% of JAK2 allele burden), it was not helpful in all instances. (A) This patient had 0.27% JAK2 V617F within the peripheral blood and the bone marrow morphology was normal (PAS staining, ×10 magnification). (B) This image shows bone marrow with a slight increase in megakaryocyte count but with no atypia, and the patient was 0.54% positive for the JAK2 V617F mutation (PAS staining, ×20 magnification).
Figure 1. Megakaryocyte count and morphology within the low level JAK2 burden group. Bone marrow histology, in the case of the high JAK2 allele burden, always confirmed the MPN diagnosis, but in the case of a low allele burden (<3% of JAK2 allele burden), it was not helpful in all instances. (A) This patient had 0.27% JAK2 V617F within the peripheral blood and the bone marrow morphology was normal (PAS staining, ×10 magnification). (B) This image shows bone marrow with a slight increase in megakaryocyte count but with no atypia, and the patient was 0.54% positive for the JAK2 V617F mutation (PAS staining, ×20 magnification).
Diagnostics 13 02086 g001
Table 1. General patient characteristics at the time of diagnosis.
Table 1. General patient characteristics at the time of diagnosis.
DemographicsLow JAK2 V617FHigh JAK2 V617F
<3% (n = 15)≥3% but ≤15% (n = 47)>15% (n = 60)
Mean age, years (range)57 (28–91)61 (23–86)69 (39–91)
Subjects aged ≤60 years, n (%)9 (60)19 (40.4)13 (21.7)
Subjects aged >60 years, n (%)6 (40)28 (59.6)47 (78.3)
Male, n (%)8 (53)16 (34)23 (38)
Female, n (%)7 (47)31 (66)37 (62)
Splenomegaly, n (%)1 (6.7)9 (19.1)18 (30)
Hepatomegaly, n (%)1 (6.7)2 (4.3)2 (3.3)
Hepatosplenomegaly, n (%)1 (6.7)2 (4.3)6 (10)
Thrombotic events *, n (%)2 (40)10 (21.3)12 (20)
JAK2 V617F allele burden, median (range) %0.41 (0.019–2.04)9 (3.10–15)37.75 (15.55–94)
* Thrombotic events at the time of diagnosis and follow up.
Table 2. Final diagnoses within low and high level JAK2 V617F positive groups.
Table 2. Final diagnoses within low and high level JAK2 V617F positive groups.
CharacteristicJAK2 V617F Allel Burden, Median (Range) %PVETPMFUnclassified MPNCHIPOtherTotal
<3% 34031415
≥3% 1228340047
Low ≤ 15% n (%)7.18 (0.019–15)15 (24.2)32 (51.6)3 (4.8)7 (11.3)1 (1.6)4 (6.5) *62
High > 15% n (%)37.75 (15.55–94)31 (51.7)12 (20)11 (18.3)5 (8.3)01 (1.7) &60
CHIP = clonal haematopoiesis of an indeterminate potential. * one CML and two were not MPN, & MPN/MDS.
Table 3. Evaluation of bone marrow morphology and peripheral blood characteristics of low (≤15%) versus high (>15%) JAK2 V617F positive groups.
Table 3. Evaluation of bone marrow morphology and peripheral blood characteristics of low (≤15%) versus high (>15%) JAK2 V617F positive groups.
Low ≤15% and High >15% JAK2 V617F Positive n = 122
Characteristic≤15%
n = 62
>15%
n = 60
p Value
Age (years) n (%)
≤60
>60

28 (45.2)
34 (54.8)

13 (21.7)
47 (78.3)
0.007 *
Myelofibrosis
0
1
2
3

46 (74.2)
12 (19.4)
4 (6.5)
0 (0)

31 (51.7)
15 (25)
11 (18.3)
3 (2.5)
0.023 *
Cellularity
Decreased
Normal
Increased

0 (0)
29 (46.8)
33 (53.2)

1 (1.7)
12 (20)
47 (78.3)
0.005 *
Adipocytes
Normal
Decreased

30 (48.4)
32 (51.6)

43 (72.9)
16 (27.1)
0.009 *
Erythroid cells ratio
Decreased
Normal
Increased

9 (14.5)
15 (24.2)
38 (61.3)

10 (17.2)
6(10.3)
42 (72.4)
0.137 *
Myeloid cells ratio
Decreased
Normal
Increased

10 (16.1)
30 (48.4)
22 (35.5)

7 (11.9)
12 (20.3)
40 (67.8)
0.0012 *
E:M ratio
E > M
E = M
E < M

22 (35.5)
21 (33.9)
19 (30.6)

19 (32.8)
18 (31)
21 (36.2)
0.812 *
Number of megakaryocytes
Decreased
Normal
Increased

1 (1.6)
9 (14.5)
52 (83.9)

0 (0)
4 (6.7)
56 (93.3)
0.219 *
Megakaryocytes clustering
Yes
No

43 (69.4)
19 (30.6)

51 (85)
9 (15)
0.053 *
Megakryocyte nucleus morphology
Normal
Hypolobulated
Staghorn
Maturation defect

9 (14.5)
8 (12.9)
32 (51.6)
13 (21)

0 (0)
1 (1.7)
23 (39.0)
35 (59.3)
<0.0001 *
Megakryocyte atypia
Yes
No

53 (85.5)
9 (14.5)

58 (96.7)
2 (3.3)
0.054 *
RBC, median (range) ×1012/L5.10 (1.19–6.67)5.51 (2.40–8.57)0.0057 &
Hemoglobin, median (range) g/L147 (70–191)153 (57–229)0.1607 &
Hematocrit, median (range) %0.455 (0.206–0.586)0.482 (0.23–0.74)0.048 &
WBC, median (range) ×109/L9.3 (4.8–20.6)10.15 (4.1–34.8)0.070 &
PLT, median (range) ×109/L557 (34–1131)513 (117–1604)0.993 &
E:M, erythroid-myeloid ratio; RBC, red blood cells; WBC, white blood cells; PLT, platelet count; * Fischer’s exact test; & Mann-Whitney test.
Table 4. Main characteristic of patients within the <3% JAK2 V617F allele burden group.
Table 4. Main characteristic of patients within the <3% JAK2 V617F allele burden group.
Subject %JAK2 V617FBone Marrow HistologyRBCWBCPLTFinal Diagnosis
S12.04Normal NCNCHIP/old
S20.12Suggestive of MPNSlightly increasedNNProbable MPN (PV?)
S30.41Suggestive of MPNSlightly increasedNNProbable MPN (PV?)
S40.23MPNNNNUnclassified MPN
S50.54NormalNNSlightly increasedProbable ET
S60.41MPNNNIncreasedET
S71.07MPNNNIncreasedET
S81.49MPNSlightly increasedNNProbable MPN (PV?)
S90.27NormalNNSlightly increasedProbable ET
S100.56NormalNNNNot MPN
S110.019NormalNo dataNo dataNo dataNot MPN
S120.25CMLNIncreasedDecreasedCML
S131.20Suggestive of MPNSlightly increasedNNProbable MPN
S140.11Suggestive of MPNSlightly increasedNNProbable MPN
S150.12NormalSlightly increasedNNNot MPN
RBC, red blood cells; WBC, white blood cells; PLT, platelet count; MPN, myeloproliferative neoplasm; N, normal; CML, chronic myelogenous leukemia; PV, polycythaemia vera; ET, essential thrombocytosis.
Table 5. Bone marrow morphology and peripheral blood characteristics for the low JAK2 V617F (≤15%) positive group.
Table 5. Bone marrow morphology and peripheral blood characteristics for the low JAK2 V617F (≤15%) positive group.
Low JAK2 V617F Positive ≤15% n = 62
Characteristic<3%
n = 15
≥3% and ≤15%
n = 47
p Value
Age (years) n (%)
≤60
>60

9 (60)
6 (40)

19 (40.4)
28 (59.6)
0.238 *
Myelofibrosis
0
1
2

11 (73.3)
3 (20)
1 (6.7)

35 (74.5)
9 (19.1)
3 (6.4)
0.996 *
Cellularity
Normal
Increased

10 (66.7)
5 (33.3)

19 (40.4)
28 (59.6)
0.136 *
Adipocytes
Normal
Decreased

10 (66.7)
5 (33.3)

22 (46.8)
25 (53.2)
0.239 *
Erythroid cells ratio
Decreased
Normal
Increased

2 (13.3)
3 (20)
10 (66.7)

7 (14.9)
12(25.5)
28 (59.6)
0.879 *
Myeloid cells ratio
Decreased
Normal
Increased

3 (20)
8 (53.3)
4 (26.7)

7 (14.9)
22 (46.8)
18 (38.3)
0.699 *
E:M ratio
E > M
E = M
E < M

7 (46.7)
4 (26.7)
4 (26.7)

15 (31.9)
17 (36.2)
15 (31.9)
0.576 *
Number of megakaryocytes
Decreased
Normal
Increased

1 (6.7)
5 (33.3)
9 (60)

0 (0)
4 (8.5)
43 (91.5)
0.009 *
Megakaryocytes clustering
Yes
No

5 (33.3)
10 (66.7)

38 (80.9)
9 (19.1)
0.001 *
Megakryocyte nucleus morphology
Normal
Hypolobulated
Staghorn
Maturation defect

7 (46.7)
2 (13.3)
3 (20)
3 (20)

2 (4.3)
6 (12.8)
29 (61.7)
10 (21.3)
0.0005 *
Megakryocyte atypia
Yes
No

8 (53.3)
7 (46.7)

45 (95.7)
2 (4.3)
0.0003 *
RBC, median (range) ×1012/L5.19 (4.12–6.67)5.02 (1.91–6.06)0.345 &
Hemoglobin, median (range) g/L152.5 (113–191)145 (70–175)0.058 &
Hematocrit, median (range) %0.48 (0.35–0.58)0.45 (0.20–0.53)0.032 &
WBC, median (range) ×109/L9.65 (6.4–20.6)9.1 (4.8–15.3)0.643 &
PLT, median (range) ×109/L265 (34–1008)602 (157–1131)0.0003 &
E:M, erythroid–myeloid ratio; RBC, red blood cells; WBC, white blood cells; PLT, platelet count; * Fischer’s exact test; & Mann–Whitney test.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Babarović, E.; Marijić, B.; Vranić, L.; Ban, J.; Valković, T.; Hadžisejdić, I. A Comparison of Bone Marrow Morphology and Peripheral Blood Findings in Low and High Level JAK2 V617F Allele Burden. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 2086. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13122086

AMA Style

Babarović E, Marijić B, Vranić L, Ban J, Valković T, Hadžisejdić I. A Comparison of Bone Marrow Morphology and Peripheral Blood Findings in Low and High Level JAK2 V617F Allele Burden. Diagnostics. 2023; 13(12):2086. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13122086

Chicago/Turabian Style

Babarović, Emina, Blažen Marijić, Luka Vranić, Josipa Ban, Toni Valković, and Ita Hadžisejdić. 2023. "A Comparison of Bone Marrow Morphology and Peripheral Blood Findings in Low and High Level JAK2 V617F Allele Burden" Diagnostics 13, no. 12: 2086. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13122086

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop