Next Article in Journal
Perceived Stress in Hepatitis C Virus Infected Patients under the DAA-Based Therapy
Next Article in Special Issue
A New Methodology to Assess Fallopian Tubes Microbiota and Its Impact on Female Fertility
Previous Article in Journal
Neutrophils and Asthma
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Abnormal Uterine Bleeding in Perimenopausal Women: The Role of Hysteroscopy and Its Impact on Quality of Life and Sexuality

Diagnostics 2022, 12(5), 1176; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12051176
by Salvatore Giovanni Vitale 1,*,†, Rafał Watrowski 2,*,†, Fabio Barra 3, Maurizio Nicola D’Alterio 4, Jose Carugno 5, Thozhukat Sathyapalan 6, Ilker Kahramanoglu 7, Enrique Reyes-Muñoz 8, Li-Te Lin 9,10,11, Bulent Urman 12,13, Simone Ferrero 3 and Stefano Angioni 4
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Diagnostics 2022, 12(5), 1176; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12051176
Submission received: 30 March 2022 / Revised: 26 April 2022 / Accepted: 29 April 2022 / Published: 9 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Hysteroscopy)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

nope

Author Response

Dear Reviewer!

We are very grateful for your appreciation of our work and the recommendation to accept the manuscript!

Yours sincerely,

Rafał Watrowski and Salvatore Giovanni Vitale

(on behalf of all Co-Authors)

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript represents a narrative review. I would recommend to index the references also after the figures' description for all images that are not from the personal collection. 

The strong point of the manuscript is the large number of the references.  

Endometriosis should also be discussed as a possible cause. Cite: Sima RM, PleÅŸ L, Socea B, Sklavounos P, Negoi I, Stănescu AD, Iordache II, Hamoud BH, Radosa MP, Juhasz-Boess I, Solomayer EF, Dimitriu MCT, Cîrstoveanu C, Åžerban D, Radosa JC. Evaluation of the SF-36 questionnaire for assessment of the quality of life of endometriosis patients undergoing treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Exp Ther Med. 2021 Nov;22(5):1283. doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.10718. 

The conclusions should be more concised and speciffic. 

Author Response

Dear Reviewer!

Thank you very much for your valuable time and suggestions! The manuscript has been revised accordingly. Below are our responses to your comments line-by-line:

Reviewer 2

1) The manuscript represents a narrative review. I would recommend to index the references also after the figures' description for all images that are not from the personal collection.

Response: Thank you for pointing this out. The figures belong to the personal collection of the coauthors Simone Ferrero and Fabio Barra. We actualized the figure descriptions accordingly.

2) The strong point of the manuscript is the large number of the references.

Endometriosis should also be discussed as a possible cause. Cite: Sima RM, PleÅŸ L, Socea B, Sklavounos P, Negoi I, Stănescu AD, Iordache II, Hamoud BH, Radosa MP, Juhasz-Boess I, Solomayer EF, Dimitriu MCT, Cîrstoveanu C, Åžerban D, Radosa JC. Evaluation of the SF-36 questionnaire for assessment of the quality of life of endometriosis patients undergoing treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Exp Ther Med. 2021 Nov;22(5):1283. doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.10718.

Response: Thank you for your appreciation. We have really taken care to provide the reader with the most relevant and up-to-date publications in this field.  During the revision process we added some necessary references, including your suggestion.

3) The conclusions should be more concised and speciffic.

Response: We shortened and rewrote the “Conclusion” section.

Yours sincerely,

Rafał Watrowski and Salvatore Giovanni Vitale

(on behalf of all Co-Authors)

Back to TopTop