Next Article in Journal
Lumbar Spine Computed Tomography to Magnetic Resonance Imaging Synthesis Using Generative Adversarial Network: Visual Turing Test
Previous Article in Journal
Digital Pathology Implementation in Private Practice: Specific Challenges and Opportunities
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Diagnostics
Volume 12
Issue 2
10.3390/diagnostics12020528
diagnostics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Clinical Applications of Somatostatin Receptor (Agonist) PET Tracers beyond Neuroendocrine Tumors

by
Rasmus Helgebostad
1,
Mona-Elisabeth Revheim
1,2,
Kjersti Johnsrud
1,
Kristine Amlie
1,
Abass Alavi
3 and
James Patrick Connelly
1,*
1
Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4956 Nydalen, 0424 Oslo, Norway
2
Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1171 Blindern, 0318 Oslo, Norway
3
Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2022, 12(2), 528; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020528
Submission received: 19 December 2021 / Revised: 14 February 2022 / Accepted: 16 February 2022 / Published: 18 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Medical Imaging and Theranostics)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Somatostatin receptor (SSTR) agonist tracers used in nuclear medicine scans are classically used for neuroendocrine tumor diagnosis and staging. SSTR are however, expressed more widely in a variety of cells as seen in the distribution of physiological tracer uptake during whole body scans. This provides opportunities for using these tracers for applications other than NETs and meningiomas. In this qualitative systematic review, novel diagnostics in SSTR-PET imaging are reviewed. A total of 70 studies comprised of 543 patients were qualitatively reviewed. Sarcoidosis, atherosclerosis and phosphaturic mesenchymal tumors represent the most studied applications currently with promising results. Other applications remain in progress where there are many case reports but a relative dearth of cohort studies. [18F]FDG PET provides the main comparative method in many cases but represents a well-established general PET technique that may be difficult to replace, without prospective clinical studies.

1. Introduction

Somatostatin is a cyclic peptide hormone with two active forms consisting of either 14 or 28 amino acids regulating specific and selective functions depending on the location. Somatostatin-producing cells are typically neurons or endocrine-like cells found in high density in the central and peripheral nervous systems, the endocrine pancreas, liver, spleen and in the gut. They can also be found in smaller numbers in the thyroid, adrenals, submandibular glands, kidneys, prostate, placenta blood vessels, and immune cells [1].
Somatostatin bears several endocrine functions including pituitary regulation of growth hormone (GH) and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH, inhibiting GH/TSH secretion through somatostatin secretion from the hypothalamus). Moreover, it has an inhibitory effect on various gastrointestinal functions, including gastric acid secretion, gastric emptying, intestinal motility, release of insulin and glucagon and various gastrointestinal hormones [2]. The peptide binds to the G-coupled receptor SSTR, one of a large class of cellular membrane receptor proteins with seven transmembrane segments containing a peptide binding region at the external surface and an internal signaling system based on G-proteins and changes in guanosine phosphorylation. The receptor acts as a switch that is activated by binding somatostatin. SSTR is expressed by nerve cells, many neuroendocrine cells and inflammatory cells such as lymphocytes, monocytes/macrophages, peripheral blood mononuclear cells and thymocytes [3]. There are five receptor subtypes SSTR1-5 expressed in different ratios in different organ systems. In the peripheral blood mononuclear cells and in the spleen, mainly SSTR subtypes 2 and 3 are found; in the thymus, mainly SSTR subtypes 1, 2, and 3; in macrophages and dendritic cells, mainly SSTR subtype 2; in B lymphocytes, mainly SSTR subtype 3; and in T lymphocytes, SSTR subtypes 1 through 5 [4,5,6,7]. Receptor distribution is shown in Table 1.
The SST receptor can be targeted with synthetic somatostatin analogues exhibiting both agonist and antagonist activity. Antagonist based tracers are not yet well established and are not included in this review. Octreotide was the first somatostatin agonist analogue developed for clinical application and is currently used in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors. PET (positron emission tomography) tracers are created by binding octreotide (or analogue) with a metal radionuclide using a chelating agent such as DOTA (1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid). This was achieved successfully with gallium-68 ([68Ga]) and copper-64 ([64Cu]) for PET use [5] in combination with DOTA-D-Phe-Tyr3-octreotide (DOTATOC), DOTA-1-NaI(3)-octreotide (DOTANOC), or DOTA-D-Phe-Tyr3-octreotate (DOTATATE), which differ mainly in their affinity to the various receptor subtypes (SSTR1-5). DOTATOC is more selective to type 2 and 5, DOTANOC 2,3 and 5, and DOTATATE type 2 [8]. Physiological uptake of [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC is shown in Figure 1.
Diagnostics 12 00528 g001 550
Figure 1. Physiological uptake of [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC. An imaging protocol based on EANM guidelines was used [9]. A 145MBq bolus of [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC was injected and imaging performed after 60 min.
Figure 1. Physiological uptake of [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC. An imaging protocol based on EANM guidelines was used [9]. A 145MBq bolus of [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC was injected and imaging performed after 60 min.
Diagnostics 12 00528 g001
Somatostatin receptors (SSTR) tracers are routinely used in diagnostics and therapy of neuroendocrine tumors (NET) [5], particularly gastroenteropancreatic NETs. Meningiomas are non-neuroendocrine tumors that frequently exhibit a high level of SSTR 2 expression and are not infrequent incidental findings on SSTR-PET scans performed for NET diagnosis. As a result, literature continues to accumulate regarding the use of SSTR PET for meningioma diagnosis and treatment with this provides a good example of a non-NET application. There are already a number of reviews detailing this application, thus meningiomas are excluded from this review [10,11].
SSTRs are expressed in a multitude of cells around the body that could suggest other potential uses in PET imaging. In this review, we consider these commonly available SSTR-PET tracers in diagnostic uses other than NETs and meningiomas and present an overview of reported cases and applications.

2. Materials and Methods

A search was performed in PubMed (1993–February 2021) for the most common PET tracers in clinical use using keywords DOTATOC, DOTATATE and DOTANOC. Neuroendocrine tumors were excluded using the “NOT” command for keywords “neuroendocrine” and “NET”. Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma were considered as part of the neuroendocrine tumor group and excluded. As mentioned in the introduction, studies involving meningiomas were also excluded.
For this review we included observational cohort studies and case reports. Patients with indications other than NETs and meningiomas who had diagnostic radiolabeled somatostatin receptor analogue PET imaging, using DOTANOC, DOTATOC, DOTATATE tracers were included. Publications with emphasis on technical aspects related to generators, radiochemistry, animal models, experimental reports or physics were excluded. A flow diagram of the search process is shown in Figure 2.
Diagnostics 12 00528 g002 550
Figure 2. Flow chart of the review process based on PRISMA methodology [12].
Figure 2. Flow chart of the review process based on PRISMA methodology [12].
Diagnostics 12 00528 g002

3. Results

Pubmed literature search yielded 768 results. The exclusion of non-English results and duplicates resulted in 760 articles. The titles/abstracts revealed 254 articles concerning NETs, 59 articles on meningiomas, 118 general articles about SSTR PET/CT without specific diagnostic focus, 83 articles regarding production and 134 involving therapeutic use. These articles were all excluded. A total of 112 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. Using the same criteria, 43 full-text articles were excluded and 70 studies with a total of 543 patients were included in a qualitative systematic review. A PRISMA flow diagram [9] of the process is shown in Figure 2.
The literature can be grouped into two broad sections on inflammation including cardiovascular disease and ischemia, and neoplasia divided into benign and malignant tumors. An overview of the literature and references is given in Table 2. As can be expected for novel or incidental applications of SSTR tracers, the literature consists of relatively small cohort studies and a number of case reports. Table 3 and Table 4 list details of cohort studies for each subject area. The case studies listed in Table 2 are reviewed in the Section 4.
SSTR tracer imaging protocols described in each study largely conform to standard protocols with regard to timing and activity used for neuroendocrine tumors [9]. Typically, a tracer activity of 75–300 MBq was administered and imaging performed 1 h (±30 min) after injection. Two exceptions are the study on disease activity in sarcoidosis by Sharma et al. [13] with activities of 1110–1480 MBq and the tumor-induced osteomalacia study by Breer et al. [14] with imaging performed 20 min after injection.
Table
Table 2. Overview of pathology (other than NET and meningioma) yielded by the literature search.
Table 2. Overview of pathology (other than NET and meningioma) yielded by the literature search.
Inflammatory DiseaseCohort Studies
(Table 3)		Case Reports
Takayasu arteritis 1 ([15])
Graves ophthalmopathy 2 ([16,17])
IgG mediated lymphadenopathy 1 ([18])
Endometriosis1 ([19])
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis1 ([20])
Pulmonary tuberculosis1 ([21])
Sarcoidosis
  ●
Thoracic
2 ([13,22])
  ●
Cardiac
4 ([23,24,25,26])4 ([27,28,29,30])
  ●
Neural
 1 ([31])
Myocardial infarction associated inflammation2 ([32,33])
Atherosclerosis
  ●
Coronary and carotid
1 ([34])
  ●
Aortic and carotid
2 ([35,36])
Ischemia in postoperative stroke 1 ([37])
NeoplasiaCohort Studies
(Table 4)		Case Reports
  Benign
Phosphaturic mesenchymal tumors13 ([14,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49])17 ([50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66])
Juvenile angiofibroma1 ([67])
Enchondroma 1 ([68])
Vertebral hemangioma 1 ([69])
Uterine leiomyoma 1 ([70])
  Malignant
Multiple myeloma1 ([71])1 ([72])
Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma 2 ([73,74])
Renal clear cell carcinoma 3 ([75,76,77])
Gastrointestinal stromal tumor 1 ([78])
Hepatocellular carcinoma 1 ([79])
Choroidal melanoma 1 ([80])
Osteosarcoma 1 ([81])
Oligodendroglioma 1 ([82])
Table
Table 3. Summary of cohort studies relating to inflammation (abbreviations: ([18F]FDG, 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose, Pt, number of patients).
Table 3. Summary of cohort studies relating to inflammation (abbreviations: ([18F]FDG, 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose, Pt, number of patients).
AuthorRefType of StudyPtRadiotracer Scanner, Injected Activity and Delay before AcquisitionComments
Endometriosis
Fastrez, M. (2017)[19]Pilot study12[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT 2 MBq/kg, 60 minDOTATATE showed uptake in rectovaginal deep infiltrating endometriosis and adenomyoma, but not in superficial peritoneal endometriosis or ovarian endometrioma. Immunohistochemistry used to confirm findings.
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
Ambrosini, V. (2010)[20]Prospective14[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-NOC PET/CT (GE discovery STE) 120–180 MBq, 60 minDOTANOC uptake corresponded to areas of HRCT anomalies in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, suggesting SSTR expression.
Pulmonary tuberculosis
Naftalin, C. (2020)[21]Prospective14[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-NOC, PET/MR (Siemens biograph mMR) 191.7 ± 9.3 MBq, dynamic uptake image analysis on data after 60 min
[18F]FDG		DOTANOC able to detect pulmonary tuberculosis lesions, but [18F]FDG was more sensitive for both active and sub-clinical lesions.
Systemic sarcoidosis
Sharma, S. (2018)[13]Prospective39[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-NOC PET/CT (Siemens biograph mCT) 1110–1480 MBq, 30 min27/39 patients symptomatic sarcoidosis with thoracic involvement, increased DOTANOC uptake in 25/27.
Nobashi, T. (2016)[22]Prospective20[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT (GE Discovery STE) 119.7 ± 29.3 MBq, 67.5 ± 8.5 minSSTR PET positive in 19 patients, 67Ga-scintigraphy in 17. Suggests SSTR PET is superior in detecting sarcoidosis lesions.
Cardiac sarcoidosis
Bravo, P. (2021)[23]Pilot study13[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE, PET/CT (GE Discovery RX or Lightspeed VCT 64) 2 MBq/kg, 60 min
[18F]FDG PET/CT		DOTATATE imaging less sensitive than [18F]FDG for detection of myocardial inflammation.
Gormsen, L. (2016)[24]Prospective19[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-NOC PET/CT(Siemens Biograph 64), 3 MBq/kg, 90 min
[18F]FDG,		Large proportion of [18F]FDG-PET images were inconclusive, better diagnostic accuracy with DOTANOC in known/suspected cardiac sarcoidosis.
Pizarro, C. (2018)[25]Prospective17[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT(Siemens Biograph 2) 2 MBq/kg, 65 ± 28 minReported SSTR PET allowed for visualization of acute cardiac sarcoidosis and absent uptake correlated with use of immunosuppressants. SSTR PET may be useful in treatment response.
Lapa, C. (2016)[26]Prospective15[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-NOC PET/CT (Siemens Biograph 2 or mCT 64) 124 ± 31 MBq, 60 minSSTR PET in high concordance with cardiac MRI, in patients with systemic sarcoidosis and myocardial involvement.
Myocardial infarction associated inflammation
Tarkin, J. (2019)[32]Prospective12[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE As for Tarkin (2017) [34]DOTATATE imaging detects myocardial inflammation post infarction, both in old and ischemic injury, possibly providing a biomarker for inflammation in heart failure.
Lapa, C. (2015)[33]Prospective12[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT (Siemens Biograph mCT 64), 104 ± 30 MBq, 60 minDOTATOC correlates with cardiac MRI when detecting myocardial infarction, less specific with myocarditis.
Atherosclerosis
Tarkin, J. (2017)[34]Prospective42[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT (GE Discovery 690)147.8 ± 31.6 MBq, dynamic up to 90 min or static after 60 min [18F]FDGDOTATATE provides quantifiable, cell-specific marker of atherosclerotic inflammation that outperforms [18F]FDG in coronary arteries.
Lee, R. (2018)[35]Retrospective50[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT(Siemens Biograph mCT 40 or 64) 185 MBq, 60 minDOTATOC findings in thoracic aorta correlates significantly with cardiovascular risk factors.
Pedersen, S. (2015)[36]Prospective10[64Cu]Cu-DOTA-TATE PET/MR (Siemens Biograph mMR), 154 MBq, 85 & 299 minDOTATATE accumulates in atherosclerotic plaques of the carotid artery. Potential for identifying vulnerable plaques.
Table
Table 4. Summary of cohort studies relating to neoplasia (abbreviations: ([18F]FDG, 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose; [111In]In OCT, Indium pentetreotide; Pt, number of patients).
Table 4. Summary of cohort studies relating to neoplasia (abbreviations: ([18F]FDG, 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose; [111In]In OCT, Indium pentetreotide; Pt, number of patients).
AuthorRefType of StudyPtRadiotracer Scanner, Injected Activity and Delay before AcquisitionComments
Phosphaturic mesenchymal tumors (PMT)
John, J. (2019)[38]Retrospective16[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT(Siemens Biograph) 75–185 MBq, 30–45 minOut of 16 patients with clinically suspected oncogenic osteomalacia 13 patients were found to be SSTR PET positive for a possible mesenchymal tumour. 10 patients underwent surgery, all of which biopsy confirmed PMT.
Paquet, M. (2018)[40]Prospective15[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT(Siemens Biograph mCT, Phillips GeminiTF16), 1.6 MBq/kg, 60 min.9/15 identified suspect tumor, 8 removed surgically, all of them histologically proven to be PMT.
Singh, D. (2017)[49]Prospective17[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-NOC PET/CT (Siemens mCT biograph 64), 111–148 MBq, 45 ± 15 min.DOTANOC PET/CT revealed 52 lesions in 17 patients with elevated FGF-23 and hypophosphatemia, where 11 were highly suspicious for culprit lesions. Subsequent anatomical imaging with CT/MRI showed concordant results in 7 out of 9 patients. These lesions were excised and histologically verified PMTs. Multiple lesions make it difficult to identify the culprit lesion.
Satyaraddi, A. (2017)[41]Retrospective13[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE, [18F]FDG Scan details not givenDOTATATE revealed PMT in 9/9 patients, of whom 3 declined surgery. Other 6 had histologically verified PMTs.
González, G. (2017)[42]Retrospective6[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE Scan details not givenTwo tumors located using DOTATATE
El-Maouche, D. (2016)[43]Prospective11[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT(Siemens mCT), ca 185 MBq, 60 min
[111In]In-OCT, [18F]FDG		6/11 patients had tumor successfully identified. DOTATATE identified 6/6, [111In]In-OCT and [18F]FDG both with 4/6.
Bhavani, N. (2016)[44]Retrospective10[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-NOC PET/CT (GE Discovery 609) 111–185 MBq, 60 minDOTANOC detected PMT in 9/10 cases. 6/10 made full clinical recovery after complete resection.
Zhang, J. (2015)[45]Retrospective54[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT(Siemens Biograph 64) 111–148 MBq, ca 45 minDOTATATE positive in 44 patients, where 33 had surgery to remove lesions. 32 histologically confirmed PMT. 10 who were not positive responded well to conservative treatment and thus PMT can be ruled out.
Agrawal, K. (2015)[46]Retrospective6[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT(GE Discovery STE-16) 1.5 MBq/kg, 45–60 min,
[18F]FDG		[18F]FDG-PET identified PMT in 2/4 patients. DOTATATE identified PMT in 5/6 patients.
Jadhav, S. (2014)[47]Retrospective16[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT (Discovery STE) 74–111 MBq, 60–90 min. [18F]FDG, [99Tc]Tc-HYNIC-TOC9/16 patients had tumor successfully identified. DOTATATE, HYNIC-TOC (tectrotyd) both identified 7/7, [18F]FDG 4/8.
Breer, S. (2014)[14]Prospective5[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT(Siemens Biograph), 58–110 MBq, 20 min, [111In]In-OCT[111In]In-OCT SPECT-CT identified 1/5 tumors, DOTATATE-PET 5/5. Histologically confirmed PMT.
Clifton-Bligh, R. (2013)[48]Prospective6[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT, 103–226 MBq, 45–60 minDOTATATE detected PMT in all 6 cases. 5/6 made full clinical recovery after resection. Patient with symptoms with residual on follow up PET.
Juvenile angiofibroma
Gronkiewicz, Z. (2016)[67]Prospective6[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT (Siemens Biograph 64) 120–160 MBq, 60 minDOTATATE showed uptake in areas matching the pathologic tissue in juvenile angiofibroma.
Multiple myeloma
Sonmezoglu, K. (2017)[71]Prospective21[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT (Siemens Biograph 6 or GE Discovery V710), 100–150 MBq, 45–60 min. [18F]FDGNo significant difference was found between the two modalities in terms of lesion numbers detected in multiple myoma. However, diffuse bone marrow uptake of DOTATATE seems to be a predicting factor for overall survival.

4. Discussion

4.1. Inflammation

Activated macrophages were shown to express a large amount of SSTR2 making these a possible target for SSTR PET in inflammatory disease. Historically, inflammatory cells’ requirement for glucose has been the primary target for PET/CT with the glucose analog 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose ([18F]FDG). This method has limitations in tissues with high glucose consumption such as the brain and heart, or in tissue with high background tracer uptake such as the kidneys. The papers in this section considered the utility of SSTR PET for investigating inflammation and in many cases compared the results with [18F]FDG PET.

4.1.1. Diverse Inflammatory Processes

Two cases of Takayasu arteritis (TA) were reported by Tarkin et al. [15] where [18F]FDG PET proved useful in diagnosing TA but more limited in value for tracking therapeutic responses or detecting residual arteritis. SSTR PET/MRI accurately identified the lesions in both cases suggesting potential for further evaluation. Broadly speaking [18F]FDG is highly sensitive but relatively non-specific, and cannot accurately distinguish arteritis from metabolically active vascular remodeling [83]. SSTR tracers may provide an alternative.
Arora et al. [16] reported two cases of Graves orbitopathy where SSTR PET/CT identified lesions without physiological uptake in adjacent muscle tissue, suggesting higher sensitivity than [18F]FDG PET. Pichler et al. [17] showed similar findings in one patient.
Cheng et al. [18] reported a case where SSTR PET/CT incidentally revealed IgG4 mediated lymphadenopathy in a 60 year old male, confirmed on histology.
In an observational study of 14 patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis Ambrosini et al. [20] reported SSTR tracer uptake directly corresponded to pathological areas on high-resolution CT (HRCT). A control group of nonspecific interstitial pneumonia showed faint tracer uptake and healthy individuals showed no uptake.
Fastrez et al. [19] conducted a pilot study of 12 patients with various degrees of endometriosis. SSTR PET/CT showed uptake in rectovaginal deep infiltrating endometriosis and adenomyoma, but not in superficial peritoneal endometriosis or ovarian endometrioma. The study concluded that SSTR PET cannot be used to diagnose endometriosis.
SSTR tracer and [18F]FDG PET/MRI imaging were compared in 14 patients with pulmonary tuberculosis by Naftalin et al. [21]. [68Ga]Ga-DOTANOC was able to detect pulmonary lesions, but [18F]FDG was more sensitive for both active and subclinical lesions (see Figure 3).
In summary, these papers suggest that SSTR-PET tracers show uptake in diverse inflammatory processes, in some cases outperforming [18F]FDG PET regarding sensitivity and specificity. However, SSTR PET is generally less applicable than [18F]FDG, performing less well in tuberculosis and endometriosis. Tissue receptor diversity may underlie this variability.

4.1.2. Sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis is a heterogeneous, granulomatous disorder of unknown etiology. In the past, gallium-67 [67Ga]citrate scintigraphy was used for sarcoidosis but bears lower resolution/sensitivity and higher patient dose than PET and has been superseded by conventional radiology and [18F]FDG PET. Guidelines from European and American nuclear medicine and cardiac societies recommend the use of [18F]FDG PET in cardiac sarcoidosis diagnosis [84]. As few as 5% of patients with systemic sarcoidosis have clinical cardiac sarcoidosis, but autopsy studies reveal that as many as 70% have subclinical cardiac involvement. [18F]FDG PET otherwise plays a role in patients investigated for fever of unknown origin or lymphadenopathy where the eventual diagnosis is sarcoidosis.
In 11 studies with a total of 130 patients, SSTR PET was investigated as an alternative to [18F]FDG in systemic sarcoidosis. Sharma et al. [13] investigated 39 patients with sarcoidosis of whom 27 had symptomatic sarcoidosis with thoracic involvement, where [68Ga]Ga-DOTANOC uptake indicated increased disease activity in 25/27 patients (92%). In the asymptomatic group, 2/12 exhibited increased disease activity on [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET. Nobashi et al. [22] compared [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET to [67Ga] citrate scintigraphy (which is taken up in sarcoid lesions by mechanisms other than somatostatin receptors) in 20 patients. [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC was positive in 19/20 patients vs. 17/20 in scintigraphy and demonstrated more lesions, suggesting SSTR PET is better at identifying sarcoid lesions; however, this can be explained by PET’s superior sensitivity compared to scintigraphy and not necessarily by higher lesion uptake.
A total of eight studies consider SSTR tracers specifically for cardiac sarcoid. Bravo et al. [23] reported a pilot study with 13 patients and found SSTR PET less sensitive than [18F]FDG PET for detection of myocardial inflammation. Some representative results are shown in Figure 4.
In contrast Gormsen et al. [24] compared [68Ga]Ga-DOTANOC to [18F]FDG and showed a large proportion of [18F]FDG images were inconclusive whereas [68Ga]Ga-DOTANOC imaging illustrated excellent diagnostic accuracy, although with significant inter-observer variability. Pizarro et al. [25] reported 17 patients with cardiac sarcoid and varying degrees of immunosuppressant treatment imaged using SSTR PET and cardiac MR. They concluded SSTR PET may be more specific for acute inflammation and bear a potential role in treatment response. Other earlier or smaller studies demonstrated similar or improved performance of SSTR-PET tracers compared with [18F]FDG [26,27,28,29,30]. A case of neurosarcoidosis imaged with [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE was reported by Unterrainer et al. [31].
These studies show variable comparative sensitivity of SSTR-PET tracers compared to [18F]FDG PET. One factor mentioned is the reliability of the [18F]FDG PET heart protocol that includes patients undertaking a low carbohydrate diet for 24–48 h, fasting for 12 h or more prior to imaging and a heparin bolus. This complicates the logistics of the procedure, adds the risk of poor compliance and may be a factor in differences in sensitivity of the studies. SSTR-PET tracers do not require a similar heart protocol.

4.1.3. Other Causes of Myocardial Inflammation

Tarkin et al. [32] studied 12 patients with a history of myocardial infarction (MI) comparing [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE to [18F]FDG PET within infarcted and non-infarcted segments. [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE exhibited very low background myocardial binding; however, myocardial [18F]FDG was uninterpretable in five scans (42%) despite pre-scan fasting. [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE imaging detected post infarction myocardial inflammation in both old and new ischemic injury. Close correlation between SSTR PET and MR in 12 patients with active peri/myocarditis or subacute myocardial infarction was reported by Lapa et al. [33]. Both studies suggest SSTR PET may have potential as a biomarker for cardiac remodeling.

4.1.4. Atherosclerosis

Vulnerable plaques can be identified with SSTR-analogs by uptake in activated macrophages. There were three studies in this category. Lee, et al. [35] retrospectively investigated 50 patients originally screened with SSTR PET for NETs to observe whether there was incidental uptake in the thoracic aorta and found uptake correlating with cardiovascular risk factors, suggesting potential for imaging vulnerable plaque. Tarkin et al. [34] compared [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE with [18F]FDG in coronary, carotid and aortic artery plaque in 42 patients. Both tracers distinguish culprit from non-culprit plaque in coronary and carotid arteries in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), stroke, or transient ischemic attack (TIA); however, nearby background [18F]FDG uptake rendered coronary [18F]FDG scans uninterpretable in a significant number of patients (64%). [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE scans were readable in all patients and supported the view that SSTR PET offers superior coronary imaging, excellent macrophage specificity and better power in discriminating high-risk versus low-risk coronary lesions. Both the study by Tarkin et al. [34] and a study by Pedersen et al. [36] use histopathological methods to correlate SSTR tracer uptake with SSTR2, CD (cluster of differentiation) 68 and CD163 expression in activated macrophages.
In summary, in coronary and vascular disease, SSTR PET shows some tracer uptake associated with active macrophages in inflammatory lesions, both acute and chronic, and contains a distinct advantage over [18F]FDG PET with much lower background uptake.

4.1.5. Neuroinflammation

Dundar et al. [37] report three cases of incidentally detected stroke in oncology scans using [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE, [11C]-choline and [18F]FDG tracers suggesting tracer uptake in neuroinflammation in regions of acute/subacute stroke.

4.2. Benign Neoplasia

Neuroendocrine tumors originate from a cell population normally expressing SSTRs and the well differentiated types of tumor typically overexpress these receptors. Several other neoplastic processes were found to exhibit increased expression of SSTRs as well. The reason is not fully understood, but is most likely linked to the role of somatostatin in regulating proliferation, mitogenesis and apoptosis [6]. A total of 46 studies were found investigating neoplastic processes other than NETs, consisting of a few exceptions with reports of incidental findings and small case studies.

4.2.1. Tumor-Induced Osteomalacia and Phosphaturic Mesenchymal Tumors

Tumor-induced osteomalacia (TIO), also termed oncogenic osteomalacia, is a paraneoplastic syndrome typically caused by small benign mesenchymal tumors and characterized by hypophosphatemia (phosphaturic mesenchymal tumors, PMT). Tumor cells produce fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) which in turn decreases proximal tubule reabsorption of phosphates and also inhibits vitamin D3 metabolism. This mobilizes calcium and phosphate from bones, and reduces osteoblastic activity which leads to bone tissue loss. It is diagnosed by identifying chronic hypophosphatemia, elevated FGF23 and decreased 1,25-OH2-Vitamin D [85]. Complete removal of the tumor is curative, which highlights the importance of locating the tumor. SSTRs were found on the cell membranes of active FGF23 secreting tumors with variable degrees of expression and thus SSTR analog tracers could be helpful in imaging [86]. A total of 30 studies involving 196 patients investigated TIO with SSTR PET. Single case studies comprised 16 of 30 reports, as can be expected with such a rare disease.
Zhang [45] retrospectively reviewed 54 patient histories with clinically suspected TIO. SSTR PET/CT was positive in 44 patients, among which 33 underwent surgery to remove lesions. Postsurgical pathological examination confirmed causative tumors in 32 patients whose symptoms diminished after surgery. El-Maouche et al. [43] performed a prospective study of 11 patients comparing [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE with [18F]FDG and [111In]In-pentetreotide (octreoscan). Six patients had a culprit tumor successfully identified. [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE detected 6/6, [18F]FDG and octreoscan both found 4/6 suggesting [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE exhibited better sensitivity than the alternatives. Small studies by Agrawal et al. [46] and Jadhav et al. [47] also reported higher sensitivity and specificity for SSTR tracers compared with [18F]FDG. Multiple other case and small studies summarized in Table 2 report localization of culprit lesions in patients with TIO using SSTR tracers [14,38,39,40,41,42,44,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66]. An example showing culprit lesions identified in 3 patients using [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET-CT from a small study by John et al. [38] is shown in Figure 5.
In summary, PMT is a rare lesion that can arise in the head and neck or lower extremities. PET is typically performed as a whole body protocol (+/−extremities) and therefore lends itself to uncovering primary lesions of unknown origin. The data suggest that SSTR tracers outperform [18F]FDG and is slowly becoming accepted as a sensitive imaging method for localizing the culprit lesion [87].

4.2.2. Other Benign Tumors

Juvenile angiofibroma presents with rapidly growing vessels, associated with a higher SSTR2A expression in patients. Gronkiewicz et al. [67] performed a prospective study in six patients using SSTR PET that showed weak uptake in areas matching the pathologic tissue. In all cases, immunohistochemical examination revealed SSTR2A with a high staining index. The weak uptake was suggested to be due to intracellular localization of receptors.
A case of an incidental enchondroma in the right tibia was reported by Mahajan et al. [68] imaged on SSTR PET suggesting overexpression of SSTR in enchondromas.
Vertenten et al. [69] described a case of a patient with known pancreatic cancer showing [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE uptake in the spine suspected to be metastases. CT showed characteristic appearances of multiple hemangiomas.
Liu et al. [70] described a case where [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE uptake was observed in an incidentally detected uterine leiomyoma.
These benign incidental findings with SSTR tracer uptake highlights the potential for false positive findings on SSTR-PET scans performed for NETs.

4.3. Malignant Disease

4.3.1. Multiple Myeloma (MM)

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a neoplasm of plasma B cells characterized by bone marrow infiltration with an overproduction of a monoclonal plasma cell population and antibodies, often leading to skeletal lesions, hypercalcemia and kidney dysfunction [88]. Sharma et al. [72] described a patient with MM with two osteolytic lesions demonstrating high tracer uptake on SSTR PET/CT. Sonmezoglu et al. [71] reported a prospective study of 21 patients with known MM where all patients were scanned with both [18F]FDG PET/CT and [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT. No significant difference was found between the two modalities in terms of lesion numbers detected. However, diffuse bone marrow uptake of [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE seemed to be a predictive factor for reduced overall survival. Some lesions visible on [18F]FDG were not detected on SSTR PET and the authors hypothesized that this might be influenced by a mismatch between receptor expression and tracer-binding affinity, particularly for SSTR3 and 5 receptors.

4.3.2. Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma (EHE)

Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) is a rare low-grade tumor originating from vascular endothelial or pre-endothelial cells with the potential to metastasize and recur [89]. Derlin et al. [74] described a case where [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE and [18F]FDG identified vertebral metastasis from EHE. [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE demonstrated a higher tumor to background ratio. Long et al. [73] reported a case of EGE in the right upper mediastinum located with [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE, pathologically confirmed after resection. This case was also associated with TIO (see Section 4.2.1). A recent consensus statement on EHE diagnosis and treatment [89] mentions [18F]FDG PET as a useful adjunct. However, it remains yet to be established whether SSTR PET represents a better option.

4.3.3. Renal Cell Carcinoma Metastases

Vamadevan et al. [75] reported a case where metastasis from clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) in the pancreas was incidentally detected on SSTR PET/CT. Vamedevan et al. [76] subsequently continued to report progression and a metastasis in the patient’s left thigh. Höög et al. [77] retrospectively compared [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC in one patient vs. [18F]FDG in another patient, both diagnosed with ccRCC and with lesions suspicious for metastases. [18F]FDG showed no uptake in an adrenal metastasis. [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC identified a pancreatic metastasis. Both lesions were histopathologically proven to be of ccRCC origin and to demonstrate SSTR2 expression. These case reports highlight both the potential utility of SSTR tracers for RCC metastases but also the need to consider differential diagnoses on SSTR scans performed for neuroendocrine tumors.

4.3.4. Various Malignancies Reported as Case Reports

Braat et al. [78] reported of a case where SSTR PET detected a gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) in the appendix. Savelli et al. [82] reported a case where SSTR PET detected relapse of a previously resected oligodendroglioma. The article suggested the consideration of further research in theragnostics based on the significant tracer uptake and contrast and potential for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). Freesmeyer et al. [79] reported a case where SSTR PET incidentally detected a hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with skeletal metastasis. Shamim et al. [80] reported a case where SSTR PET incidentally detected metastasis from choroidal melanoma in the pancreas. Qin et al. [81] compared [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE and [18F]FDG uptake in osseous lesions from synchronous multifocal osteosarcoma. [18F]FDG did not identify lesions; however, [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE accumulated in lesions which were later resected and pathologically confirmed.
In summary, these studies and cases highlight that SSTR tracers provide a potential alternative to [18F]FDG for imaging certain malignancies other than NET. In NET tumors, [18F]FDG and SSTR tracers are often complementary in their avidity for tumor types, reflecting the degree of differentiation and proliferation and this observation appears to apply to other tumor types. [18F]FDG however, is a well-established and accessible technique with relatively well understood kinetics and metabolism whereas SSTR tracers can bear potentially great specificity but are dependent on SSTR expression, which is often much less well understood in many lesion types.

5. Conclusions

SSTR tracers bear applications beyond its classical use in neuroendocrine tumors and meningiomas. Numerous tissues express SSTR1-5 and pathological processes originating from these tissues can provide targets for SSTR imaging. Use of SSTR PET for investigating tumor-induced osteomalacia and localization of culprit lesions is virtually an established technique.
Inflammation, particularly associated with sarcoidosis and atherosclerosis, represents another application with promising results. Activated macrophages express SSTR and take up SSTR tracers which may provide a level of specificity not available with [18F]FDG PET. In addition, SSTR tracers exhibit advantageously low background uptake in the heart, brain and arterial wall compared with [18F]FDG.
Other applications remain a work in progress, where there exist many case reports but a relative dearth of cohort studies. [18F]FDG PET provides the established comparative PET method in many cases, and frequently shows different sensitivity reflecting the different underlying physiology and uptake mechanism. In analogy to NET, SSTR PET can be performed as a complementary PET technique to [18F]FDG PET, particularly where the lesion is likely to be well differentiated and/or express SSTR receptors.
Moreover, new applications for SSTR tracers bear the advantage of potentially novel theragnostic opportunities for treatment with SSTR-based peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.H., J.P.C. and M.-E.R.; methodology, R.H., J.P.C. and M.-E.R.; validation, J.P.C., M.-E.R., K.J. and A.A.; investigation, R.H. and J.P.C.; resources, R.H. and M.-E.R.; writing—original draft preparation, R.H.; writing—review and editing, J.P.C., M.-E.R., K.J., K.A. and A.A.; supervision, J.P.C. and M.-E.R.; project administration, M.-E.R. and J.P.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Patient consent was given for use of the image in Figure 1.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Patel, Y.C.; Reichlin, S. Somatostatin in Hypothalamus, Extrahypothalamic Brain, and Peripheral Tissues of the Rat. Endocrinology 1978, 102, 523–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ando, H. Chapter 5-Somatostatin. In Handbook of Hormones; Takei, Y., Ando, H., Tsutsui, K., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2016; p. 36-e5. [Google Scholar]
  3. Narayanan, S.; Kunz, P.L. Role of Somatostatin Analogues in the Treatment of Neuroendocrine Tumors. J. Natl. Compr. Cancer Netw. 2015, 13, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Bhanat, E.; Koch, C.A.; Parmar, R.; Garla, V.; Vijayakumar, V. Somatostatin Receptor Expression in Non-Classical Locations–Clinical Relevance? Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord. 2018, 19, 123–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pauwels, E.; Cleeren, F.; Bormans, G.; Deroose, C.M. Somatostatin Receptor PET Ligands—The Next Generation for Clinical Practice. Am. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2018, 8, 311–331. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  6. Volante, M.; Bozzalla-Cassione, F.; Papotti, M. Somatostatin Receptors and Their Interest in Diagnostic Pathology. Endocr. Pathol. 2004, 15, 275–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Reubi, J.C.; Schaer, J.C.; Markwalder, R.; Waser, B.; Horisberger, U.; Laissue, J. Distribution of Somatostatin Receptors in Normal and Neoplastic Human Tissues: Recent Advances and Potential Relevance. Yale J. Biol. Med. 1998, 70, 471–479. [Google Scholar]
  8. Cascini, G.L.; Cuccurullo, V.; Tamburrini, O.; Rotondo, A.; Mansi, L. Peptide Imaging with Somatostatin Analogues: More than Cancer Probes. Curr. Radiopharm. 2013, 6, 36–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Bozkurt, M.F.; Virgolini, I.; Balogova, S.; Beheshti, M.; Rubello, D.; Decristoforo, C.; Ambrosini, V.; Kjaer, A.; Delgado-Bolton, R.; Kunikowska, J.; et al. Guideline for PET/CT Imaging of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms with 68Ga-DOTA-Conjugated Somatostatin Receptor Targeting Peptides and 18F-DOPA. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2017, 44, 1588–1601, Erratum in Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2017, 44, 2150–2151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Laudicella, R.; Albano, D.; Annunziata, S.; Calabrò, D.; Argiroffi, G.; Abenavoli, E.; Linguanti, F.; Vento, A.; Bruno, A.; Alongi, P.; et al. Theragnostic Use of Radiolabelled Dota-Peptides in Meningioma: From Clinical Demand to Future Applications. Cancers 2019, 11, 1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Galldiks, N.; Albert, N.L.; Sommerauer, M.; Grosu, A.L.; Ganswindt, U.; Law, I.; Preusser, M.; Le Rhun, E.; Vogelbaum, M.A.; Zadeh, G.; et al. PET Imaging in Patients with Meningioma—Report of the RANO/PET Group. Neuro-Oncol. 2017, 19, 1576–1587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Sharma, S.; Singh, A.; Sharma, S.K.; Tripathi, M.; Das, C.J.; Kumar, R. Gallium-68 DOTA-NOC PET/CT as an Alternate Predictor of Disease Activity in Sarcoidosis. Nucl. Med. Commun. 2018, 39, 768–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Breer, S.; Brunkhorst, T.; Beil, F.T.; Peldschus, K.; Heiland, M.; Klutmann, S.; Barvencik, F.; Zustin, J.; Gratz, K.-F.; Amling, M. 68Ga DOTA-TATE PET/CT Allows Tumor Localization in Patients with Tumor-Induced Osteomalacia but Negative 111In-Octreotide SPECT/CT. Bone 2014, 64, 222–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tarkin, J.M.; Wall, C.; Gopalan, D.; Aloj, L.; Manavaki, R.; Fryer, T.D.; Aboagye, E.; Bennett, M.R.; Peters, J.E.; Rudd, J.H.; et al. Novel Approach to Imaging Active Takayasu Arteritis Using Somatostatin Receptor Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2020, 13, e010389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Damle, N.A.; Arora, S.; Meel, R.; Lata, K.; Tandon, N.; Sharma, S.; Bal, C. Graves’ Ophthalmopathy on68Ga-DOTANOC Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography. Indian J. Nucl. Med. 2019, 34, 338–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pichler, R.; Sonnberger, M.; Dorninger, C.; Assar, H.; Stojakovic, T. Ga-68-DOTA-NOC PET/CT Reveals Active Graves’ Orbitopathy in a Single Extraorbital Muscle. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2011, 36, 910–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cheng, Z.; Song, S.; Han, Y.; Zou, S.; Zhu, X. Elevated 68Ga-DOTATATE Activity in IgG4-Related Lymphadenopathy. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2018, 43, 773–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fastrez, M.; Artigas, C.; Sirtaine, N.; Wimana, Z.; Caillet, M.; Rozenberg, S.; Flamen, P. Value of the 68 Ga-DOTATATE PET-CT in the Diagnosis of Endometriosis. A Pilot Study. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2017, 212, 69–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ambrosini, V.; Zompatori, M.; De Luca, F.; Antonia, D.; Allegri, V.; Nanni, C.; Malvi, D.; Tonveronachi, E.; Fasano, L.; Fabbri, M.; et al. 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT Allows Somatostatin Receptor Imaging in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Preliminary Results. J. Nucl. Med. 2010, 51, 1950–1955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Naftalin, C.M.; Leek, F.; Hallinan, J.T.P.D.; Khor, L.K.; Totman, J.J.; Wang, J.; Wang, Y.T.; Paton, N.I. Comparison of 68Ga-DOTANOC with 18F-FDG Using PET/MRI Imaging in Patients with Pulmonary Tuberculosis. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Nobashi, T.; Nakamoto, Y.; Kubo, T.; Ishimori, T.; Handa, T.; Tanizawa, K.; Sano, K.; Mishima, M.; Togashi, K. The Utility of PET/CT with 68Ga-DOTATOC in Sarcoidosis: Comparison with 67Ga-Scintigraphy. Ann. Nucl. Med. 2016, 30, 544–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Bravo, P.E.; Bajaj, N.; Padera, R.F.; Morgan, V.; Hainer, J.; Bibbo, C.F.; Harrington, M.; Park, M.-A.; Hyun, H.; Robertson, M.; et al. Feasibility of Somatostatin Receptor-Targeted Imaging for Detection of Myocardial Inflammation: A Pilot Study. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 2019, 28, 1089–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Gormsen, L.C.; Haraldsen, A.; Kramer, S.; Dias, A.H.; Kim, W.Y.; Borghammer, P. A Dual Tracer 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT Pilot Study for Detection of Cardiac Sarcoidosis. EJNMMI Res. 2016, 6, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Pizarro, C.; Kluenker, F.; Dabir, D.; Thomas, D.; Gaertner, F.C.; Essler, M.; Grohé, C.; Nickenig, G.; Skowasch, D. Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Performance of Somatostatin Receptor Positron Emission Tomography in Cardiac Sarcoidosis. ESC Heart Fail. 2017, 5, 249–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Lapa, C.; Reiter, T.; Kircher, M.; Schirbel, A.; Werner, R.A.; Pelzer, T.; Pizarro, C.; Skowasch, D.; Thomas, L.; Schlesinger-Irsch, U.; et al. Somatostatin Receptor Based PET/CT in Patients with the Suspicion of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: An Initial Comparison to Cardiac MRI. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 77807–77814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Vachatimanont, S.; Kunawudhi, A.; Promteangtrong, C.; Chotipanich, C. Benefits of [68Ga]-DOTATATE PET-CT Comparable to [18F]-FDG in Patient with Suspected Cardiac Sarcoidosis. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 2020, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Imperiale, A.; Poindron, V.; Martinez, M.; Ohlmann, P.; Schindler, T.H.; El Ghannudi, S. 68Ga-DOTATOC PET for Treatment Efficacy Evaluation of Cardiac Sarcoidosis. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2020, 45, e416–e418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Passah, A.; Kaushik, P.; Patel, C.; Parakh, N. Gallium-68 DOTANOC Scan in a Patient with Suspected Cardiac Sarcoidosis. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 2018, 25, 2177–2178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Reiter, T.; Werner, R.A.; Bauer, W.; Lapa, C. Detection of Cardiac Sarcoidosis by Macrophage-Directed Somatostatin Receptor 2-Based Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography. Eur. Heart J. 2015, 36, 2404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Unterrainer, M.; Ruf, V.; Ilhan, H.; Vettermann, F.; Holzgreve, A.; Cyran, C.C.; Tonn, J.-C.; Bartenstein, P.; Albert, N.L. Teaching NeuroImages: Advanced Imaging of Neurosarcoidosis with 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT. Neurology 2019, 92, e2512–e2513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tarkin, J.M.; Calcagno, C.; Dweck, M.R.; Evans, N.R.; Chowdhury, M.M.; Gopalan, D.; Newby, D.E.; Fayad, Z.A.; Bennett, M.R.; Rudd, J.H. 68Ga-DOTATATE PET Identifies Residual Myocardial Inflammation and Bone Marrow Activation After Myocardial Infarction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2019, 73, 2489–2491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Lapa, C.; Reiter, T.; Li, X.; Werner, R.A.; Samnick, S.; Jahns, R.; Buck, A.; Ertl, G.; Bauer, W. Imaging of Myocardial Inflammation with Somatostatin Receptor Based PET/CT—A Comparison to Cardiac MRI. Int. J. Cardiol. 2015, 194, 44–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Tarkin, J.; Joshi, F.R.; Evans, N.R.; Chowdhury, M.M.; Figg, N.L.; Shah, A.V.; Starks, L.T.; Martin-Garrido, A.; Manavaki, R.; Yu, E.; et al. Detection of Atherosclerotic Inflammation by 68 Ga-DOTATATE PET Compared to [18 F]FDG PET Imaging. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2017, 69, 1774–1791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Lee, R.; Kim, J.; Paeng, J.C.; Byun, J.W.; Cheon, G.J.; Lee, D.S.; Chung, J.-K.; Kang, K.W. Measurement of 68Ga-DOTATOC Uptake in the Thoracic Aorta and Its Correlation with Cardiovascular Risk. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2018, 52, 279–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Pedersen, S.F.; Sandholt, B.V.; Keller, S.H.; Hansen, A.E.; Clemmensen, A.E.; Sillesen, H.; Højgaard, L.; Ripa, R.S.; Kjær, A. 64 Cu-DOTATATE PET/MRI for Detection of Activated Macrophages in Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaques. Arter. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2015, 35, 1696–1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Dundar, A.; Bold, M.S.; Agac, B.; Kendi, A.T.; Friedman, S.N. Stroke Detection with 3 Different PET Tracers. Radiol. Case Rep. 2019, 14, 1447–1451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Hephzibah, J.; John, J.R.; Oommen, R.; Shanthly, N.; Mathew, D. Ga-68 DOTATATE Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography Imaging in Oncogenic Osteomalacia: Experience from a Tertiary Level Hospital in South India. Indian J. Nucl. Med. 2019, 34, 188–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Broski, S.M.; Folpe, A.L.; Wenger, D.E. Imaging Features of Phosphaturic Mesenchymal Tumors. Skelet. Radiol. 2018, 48, 119–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Paquet, M.; Gauthé, M.; Yin, J.Z.; Nataf, V.; Bélissant, O.; Orcel, P.; Roux, C.; Talbot, J.-N.; Montravers, F. Diagnostic Performance and Impact on Patient Management of 68Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT for Detecting Osteomalacia-Associated Tumours. Eur. J. Pediatrics 2018, 45, 1710–1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Satyaraddi, A.; Cherian, K.E.; Shetty, S.; Kapoor, N.; Jebasingh, F.K.; Cherian, V.M.; Hephzibah, J.; Prabhu, A.J.; Thomas, N.; Paul, T.V. Musculoskeletal Oncogenic Osteomalacia–An Experience from a Single Centre in South India. J. Orthop. 2017, 14, 184–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. González, G.; Baudrand, R.; Sepúlveda, M.F.; Vucetich, N.; Guarda, F.J.; Villanueva, P.; Contreras, O.; Villa, A.; Salech, F.; Toro, L.; et al. Tumor-Induced Osteomalacia: Experience from a South American Academic Center. Osteoporos. Int. 2017, 28, 2187–2193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. El-Maouche, D.; Sadowski, S.M.; Papadakis, G.Z.; Guthrie, L.; Cottle-Delisle, C.; Merkel, R.; Millo, C.; Chen, C.C.; Kebebew, E.; Collins, M.T. 68Ga-DOTATATE for Tumor Localization in Tumor-Induced Osteomalacia. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2016, 101, 3575–3581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Bhavani, N.; Asirvatham, A.R.; Kallur, K.; Menon, A.S.; Pavithran, P.V.; Nair, V.; Vasukutty, J.R.; Menon, U.; Kumar, H. Utility of Gallium-68 DOTANOC PET/CT in the Localization of Tumour-Induced Osteomalacia. Clin. Endocrinol. 2015, 84, 134–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Zhang, J.; Zhu, Z.; Zhong, D.; Dang, Y.; Xing, H.; Du, Y.; Jing, H.; Qiao, Z.; Xing, X.; Zhuang, H.; et al. 68Ga DOTATATE PET/CT Is an Accurate Imaging Modality in the Detection of Culprit Tumors Causing Osteomalacia. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2015, 40, 642–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Agrawal, K.; Bhadada, S.; Mittal, B.R.; Shukla, J.; Sood, A.; Bhattacharya, A.; Bhansali, A. Comparison of 18F-FDG and 68Ga DOTATATE PET/CT in Localization of Tumor Causing Oncogenic Osteomalacia. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2015, 40, e6–e10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Jadhav, S.; Kasaliwal, R.; Lele, V.; Rangarajan, V.; Chandra, P.; Shah, H.; Malhotra, G.; Jagtap, V.S.; Budyal, S.; Lila, A.R.; et al. Functional Imaging in Primary Tumour-Induced Osteomalacia: Relative Performance of FDG PET/CT vs. Somatostatin Receptor-Based Functional Scans: A Series of Nine Patients. Clin. Endocrinol. 2014, 81, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Clifton-Bligh, R.; Hofman, M.S.; Duncan, E.; Sim, I.-W.; Darnell, D.; Clarkson, A.; Wong, T.; Walsh, J.; Gill, A.J.; Ebeling, P.R.; et al. Improving Diagnosis of Tumor-Induced Osteomalacia with Gallium-68 DOTATATE PET/CT. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2013, 98, 687–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Singh, D.; Chopra, A.; Ravina, M.; Kongara, S.; Bhatia, E.; Kumar, N.; Gupta, S.; Yadav, S.; Dabadghao, P.; Yadav, R.; et al. Oncogenic Osteomalacia: Role of Ga-68 DOTANOC PET/CT Scan in Identifying the Culprit Lesion and Its Management. Br. J. Radiol. 2017, 90, 20160811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Then, C.; Asbach, E.; Bartsch, H.; Thon, N.; Betz, C.; Reincke, M.; Schmidmaier, R. Fibroblast Growth Factor 23-Producing Phosphaturic Mesenchymal Tumor with Extraordinary Morphology Causing Oncogenic Osteomalacia. Medicina 2020, 56, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Kumar, S.; Diamond, T. Lessons Learnt from Delayed Diagnosis of FGF-23-Producing Tumour-Induced Osteomalacia and Post-Operative Hungry Bone Syndrome. Bone Rep. 2020, 12, 100276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kaur, T.; Rush, E.T.; Bhattacharya, R.K. Phosphaturic Mesenchymal Heel Tumor Presenting with Tumor-Induced Osteomalacia. AACE Clin. Case Rep. 2019, 5, e138–e141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Jia, C.; Shao, F.; Yang, M.; Qin, C.; Lan, X. Giant Cell Tumor of Tendon Sheath Revealed on 68Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT in a Patient with Suspicious Tumor-Induced Osteomalacia. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2019, 44, 496–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Araujo, C.S.R.; Seguro, L.P.C.; Duarte, P.S.; Buchpiguel, C.; Pereira, R.M.R. Intramastoid Phosphaturic Mesenchymal Tumor Causing Hypophosphatemic Osteomalacia Detected on 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT But Not on 99mTc-Sestamibi and 18F-FDG Scans. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2019, 53, 436–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. He, Q.; Xu, Z.; Zhang, B.; Hu, W.; Zhang, X. Tumor-Induced Osteomalacia Caused by a Parotid Basal Cell Adenoma Detected by 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2018, 43, e198–e199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Ha, S.; Park, S.; Kim, H.; Go, H.; Lee, S.H.; Choi, J.Y.; Hong, J.Y.; Ryu, J.-S. Successful Localization Using 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT of a Phosphaturic Mesenchymal Tumor Causing Osteomalacia in a Patient with Concurrent Follicular Lymphoma. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2018, 52, 462–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Ding, J.; Wang, L.; Zhang, S.; Li, F.; Huo, L. Recurrent/Residual Intracranial Phosphaturic Mesenchymal Tumor Revealed on 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2018, 43, 674–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kawai, S.; Ariyasu, H.; Furukawa, Y.; Yamamoto, R.; Uraki, S.; Takeshima, K.; Warigaya, K.; Nakamoto, Y.; Akamizu, T. Effective Localization in Tumor-Induced Osteomalacia Using 68Ga-DOTATOC-PET/CT, Venous Sampling and 3T-MRI. Endocrinol. Diabetes Metab. Case Rep. 2017, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Chanukya, G.V.; Mengade, M.; Goud, J.; Rao, I.S.; Jain, A. Tumor-Induced Osteomalacia: A Sherlock Holmes Approach to Diagnosis and Management. Ann. Maxillofac. Surg. 2017, 7, 143–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Maybody, M.; Grewal, R.K.; Healey, J.H.; Antonescu, C.R.; Fanchon, L.; Hwang, S.; Carrasquillo, J.A.; Kirov, A.; Farooki, A. Ga-68 DOTATOC PET/CT-Guided Biopsy and Cryoablation with Autoradiography of Biopsy Specimen for Treatment of Tumor-Induced Osteomalacia. Cardiovasc. Interv. Radiol. 2016, 39, 1352–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Maehara, J.; Yamashita, K.; Hiwatashi, A.; Togao, O.; Kikuchi, K.; Matsumoto, Y.; Iura, K.; Oda, Y.; Ichino, I.; Nakamoto, Y.; et al. Primary Phosphaturic Mesenchymal Tumour of the Lumbar Spine: Utility of 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT Findings. BJR Case Rep. 2016, 2, 20150497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ho, C.L. Ga68-DOTA Peptide PET/CT to Detect Occult Mesenchymal Tumor-Inducing Osteomalacia: A Case Series of Three Patients. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2015, 49, 231–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Naswa, N.; Sharma, P.; Kumar, R.; Malhotra, A.; Bal, C. Successful Localization of Residual Culprit Tumor in a Case of Tumor-Induced Osteomalacia Using 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2013, 38, 639–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Haeusler, G.; Freilinger, M.; Dominkus, M.; Egerbacher, M.; Amann, G.; Kolb, A.; Schlegel, W.; Raimann, A.; Staudenherz, A. Tumor-Induced Hypophosphatemic Rickets in an Adolescent Boy—Clinical Presentation, Diagnosis, and Histological Findings in Growth Plate and Muscle Tissue. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2010, 95, 4511–4517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Von Falck, C.; Rodt, T.; Rosenthal, H.; Länger, F.; Goesling, T.; Knapp, W.H.; Galanski, M. 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT for the Detection of a Mesenchymal Tumor Causing Oncogenic Osteomalacia. Eur. J. Pediatrics 2008, 35, 1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Hesse, E.; Moessinger, E.; Rosenthal, H.; Laenger, F.; Brabant, G.; Petrich, T.; Gratz, K.F.; Bastian, L. Oncogenic Osteomalacia: Exact Tumor Localization by Co-Registration of Positron Emission and Computed Tomography. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2006, 22, 158–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Gronkiewicz, Z.; Kukwa, W.; Krolicki, L.; Cyran-Chlebicka, A.; Pawlak, D.; Stankiewicz, C.; Krzeski, A.; Górnicka, B.; Wolosz, D.; Kunikowska, J. 68Ga-DOTATATE PET in Juvenile Angiofibroma. Futur. Oncol. 2016, 12, 1483–1491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Mahajan, S.; Bodei, L.; Castellanos, S.H.; Grewal, R.K. Enchondroma of Tibia as Potential False-positive Finding on 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT Scan. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2019, 44, e57–e59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Vertenten, B.; Goethals, L.; De Geeter, F. 68Ga DOTATATE Uptake in Hemangioma Simulating Metastasis on PET Imaging. J. Belg. Soc. Radiol. 2019, 103, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Liu, H.; Zhang, W.; Chen, Y. Incidental 68Ga-DOTATATE Uptake in Uterine Leiomyoma. Endocrine 2020, 68, 233–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sonmezoglu, K.; Vatankulu, B.; Elverdi, T.; Akyel, R.; Erkan, M.E.; Halac, M.; Ocak, M.; Demirci, E.; Aydin, Y. The Role of 68Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT Scanning in the Evaluation of Patients with Multiple Myeloma. Nucl. Med. Commun. 2017, 38, 76–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Sharma, P.; Dhull, V.S.; Kc, S.S.; Bal, C.; Malhotra, A.; Kumar, R. 68Ga-DOTANOC Somatostatin Receptor PET-CT Imaging in Multiple Myeloma. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2014, 39, 374–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Long, Y.; Shao, F.; Lan, X. Mediastinal Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma Revealed on 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2020, 45, 414–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Derlin, T.; Hueper, K.; Soudah, B. 68Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT for Molecular Imaging of Somatostatin Receptor Expression in Metastasizing Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2017, 42, e478–e479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Vamadevan, S.; Le, K.; Shen, L.; Loh, H.; Mansberg, R. 68Ga-DOTATATE Uptake in Solitary Pancreatic Metastasis from Clear Cell Renal Cancer. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2017, 42, 700–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Vamadevan, S.; Le, K.; Shen, L.; Stevanovic, A.; Loh, H.; Mansberg, R. 68Ga-DOTATATE Uptake in a Soft Tissue Metastasis from Clear Cell Renal Cell Cancer. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2018, 43, 44–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Höög, A.; Kjellman, M.; Mattsson, P.; Juhlin, C.C.; Shabo, I. Somatostatin Receptor Expression in Renal Cell Carcinoma—A New Front in the Diagnostics and Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma. Clin. Genitourin. Cancer 2018, 16, e517–e520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Braat, A.J.A.T.; Goldschmeding, R.; Brosens, L.A.A.; Vriens, M.R.; de Keizer, B. Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumour Detection with Somatostatin Receptor Imaging, 68Ga-HA-DOTATATE PET–CT. Lancet Oncol. 2017, 18, e185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Freesmeyer, M.; Schulz, S.; Knösel, T.; Settmacher, U. Imaging of Somatostatin Receptor Subtype 2 in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma by 68Ga-DOTATOC PET. Nukl.-Nucl. 2009, 48, N17–N18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Shamim, S.A.; Tripathy, S.; Rastogi, S.; Barwad, A.; Prakash, S. Isolated Pancreatic Metastasis from Choroidal Melanoma after 10 Years of Enucleation Mimicking Neuroendocine Tumor on 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2020, 46, e21–e22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Qin, C.; Shao, F.; Lan, X. Diffuse Increased 68Ga-DOTATATE but Unimpressive 18F-FDG Osseous Activity in a Patient with Rapid-Progressing Synchronous Multifocal Osteosarcoma. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2020, 45, 824–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Savelli, G.; Muni, A. Somatostatin Receptors in an Anaplastic Oligodendroglioma Relapse Evidenced By 68Ga DOTANOC PET/CT. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2015, 40, e363–e365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Dejaco, C.; Ramiro, S.; Duftner, C.; Besson, F.L.; Bley, T.A.; Blockmans, D.; Brouwer, E.; Cimmino, M.A.; Clark, E.; Dasgupta, B.; et al. EULAR Recommendations for the Use of Imaging in Large Vessel Vasculitis in Clinical Practice. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2018, 77, 636–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Birnie, D.H.; Sauer, W.H.; Bogun, F.; Cooper, J.M.; Culver, D.A.; Duvernoy, C.S.; Judson, M.A.; Kron, J.; Mehta, D.; Nielsen, J.C.; et al. HRS Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Management of Arrhythmias Associated with Cardiac Sarcoidosis. Heart Rhythm 2014, 11, 1304–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Folpe, A.L.; Fanburg-Smith, J.C.; Billings, S.D.; Bisceglia, M.; Bertoni, F.; Cho, J.Y.; Econs, M.J.; Inwards, C.Y.; de Beur, S.M.J.; Mentzel, T.; et al. Most Osteomalacia-Associated Mesenchymal Tumors Are a Single Histopathologic Entity. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2004, 28, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. de Beur, S.M.J.; Streeten, E.A.; Civelek, A.C.; McCarthy, E.F.; Uribe, L.; Marx, S.J.; Onobrakpeya, O.; Raisz, L.G.; Watts, N.B.; Sharon, M.; et al. Localisation of Mesenchymal Tumours by Somatostatin Receptor Imaging. Lancet 2002, 359, 761–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Dahir, K.; Zanchetta, M.B.; Stanciu, I.; Robinson, C.; Lee, J.Y.; Dhaliwal, R.; Charles, J.; Civitelli, R.; Roberts, M.S.; Krolczyk, S.; et al. Diagnosis and Management of Tumor-Induced Osteomalacia: Perspectives from Clinical Experience. J. Endocr. Soc. 2021, 5, bvab099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. van de Donk, N.W.C.J.; Pawlyn, C.; Yong, K.L. Multiple Myeloma. Lancet 2021, 397, 410–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Stacchiotti, S.; Miah, A.; Frezza, A.; Messiou, C.; Morosi, C.; Caraceni, A.; Antonescu, C.; Bajpai, J.; Baldini, E.; Bauer, S.; et al. Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma, an Ultra-Rare Cancer: A Consensus Paper from the Community of Experts. ESMO Open 2021, 6, 100170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Diagnostics 12 00528 g003 550
Figure 3. A 55 year old woman with pulmonary tuberculosis imaged with both DOTANOC and FDG PET on day 8 of treatment. Coronal images showing PET tracer uptake. DOTANOC uptake is more discrete. Reprinted unchanged with permission from ref. [21], Copyright 2020 Springer Nature.
Figure 3. A 55 year old woman with pulmonary tuberculosis imaged with both DOTANOC and FDG PET on day 8 of treatment. Coronal images showing PET tracer uptake. DOTANOC uptake is more discrete. Reprinted unchanged with permission from ref. [21], Copyright 2020 Springer Nature.
Diagnostics 12 00528 g003
Diagnostics 12 00528 g004 550
Figure 4. Patient with thoracic sarcoidosis. Both FDG and DOTATE PET images show extensive lymphadenopathy and cardiac inflammation (arrow on maximum intensity projections A,D) Axial CT (B,E) and fused PET-CT (C,F). Reprinted with permission from ref. [23] Copyright 2019 American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.
Figure 4. Patient with thoracic sarcoidosis. Both FDG and DOTATE PET images show extensive lymphadenopathy and cardiac inflammation (arrow on maximum intensity projections A,D) Axial CT (B,E) and fused PET-CT (C,F). Reprinted with permission from ref. [23] Copyright 2019 American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.
Diagnostics 12 00528 g004
Diagnostics 12 00528 g005 550
Figure 5. Example of 3 patients with tumour induced osteomalacia (TIO) where [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT localized culprit lesions. Lesions demonstrated intense tracer uptake on the whole body representative maximum intensity projection (MIP) and fused PET/CT images (indicated by arrows). Reprinted with permission from ref [38]. Copyright 2019 Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
Figure 5. Example of 3 patients with tumour induced osteomalacia (TIO) where [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT localized culprit lesions. Lesions demonstrated intense tracer uptake on the whole body representative maximum intensity projection (MIP) and fused PET/CT images (indicated by arrows). Reprinted with permission from ref [38]. Copyright 2019 Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
Diagnostics 12 00528 g005
Table
Table 1. Distribution of somatostatin receptors in normal human tissue (adapted from [3,4,5,6,7]).
Table 1. Distribution of somatostatin receptors in normal human tissue (adapted from [3,4,5,6,7]).
TissueLocalizationReceptor Subtype
Lymphatic: SST2 (probable)
Lymph nodesGerminal centers
Peyers PatchesGerminal centers
Solitary follicles (colon)Germinal centers
AppendixGerminal centers
SpleenRed pulpSST2-3
ThymusMedullaSST1-3
Immune cells:
Macrophages SST2
Dendritic cells SST2
B lymphocytes SST3
T lymphocytes SST1-5
Kidneys: SST2 (probable)
CortexProximal tubules
MedullaVasa recta
ProstateSmooth muscleSST2
Thyroid glandEpithelial cellsSST2
GI-tract:
Stomach SST1-4
Small intestine SST1, SST5
Liver SST3
Pancreasβ cellsSST2
α cellsSST3
δ cellsSST5
Adrenal glands SST2
Lung SST4
Heart SST4
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Helgebostad, R.; Revheim, M.-E.; Johnsrud, K.; Amlie, K.; Alavi, A.; Connelly, J.P. Clinical Applications of Somatostatin Receptor (Agonist) PET Tracers beyond Neuroendocrine Tumors. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 528. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020528

AMA Style

Helgebostad R, Revheim M-E, Johnsrud K, Amlie K, Alavi A, Connelly JP. Clinical Applications of Somatostatin Receptor (Agonist) PET Tracers beyond Neuroendocrine Tumors. Diagnostics. 2022; 12(2):528. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020528

Chicago/Turabian Style

Helgebostad, Rasmus, Mona-Elisabeth Revheim, Kjersti Johnsrud, Kristine Amlie, Abass Alavi, and James Patrick Connelly. 2022. "Clinical Applications of Somatostatin Receptor (Agonist) PET Tracers beyond Neuroendocrine Tumors" Diagnostics 12, no. 2: 528. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020528

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop