Next Article in Journal
New Intraoperative Imaging Tools and Image-Guided Surgery in Gastric Cancer Surgery
Previous Article in Journal
Unusual Case of Masseter Muscle Hypertrophy in Adolescence—Case Report and Literature Overview
Previous Article in Special Issue
Shear Wave Elastography and Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS) for the Risk Stratification of Thyroid Nodules—Results of a Prospective Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Diagnostics
Volume 12
Issue 2
10.3390/diagnostics12020506
diagnostics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

2-[18F]FDG PET in the Management of Radioiodine Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer in the Era of Thyrosin-Kinases Inhibitors: A Real-Life Retrospective Study

by
Stefano Gay
1,2,
Stefano Raffa
3,4,
Anna De’Luca di Pietralata
2,
Matteo Bauckneht
3,4,
Lara Vera
1,
Alberto Miceli
3,4,
Manuela Albertelli
1,2,
Silvia Morbelli
3,4,
Massimo Giusti
2 and
Diego Ferone
1,2,*
1
Endocrinology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy
2
Endocrinology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DIMI), University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy
3
Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy
4
Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2022, 12(2), 506; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020506
Submission received: 3 January 2022 / Revised: 2 February 2022 / Accepted: 9 February 2022 / Published: 16 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Image-Based Diagnostics and Radiometabolic Therapy of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Purpose To evaluate the role of 2-[18F]FDGPET/CT in the follow-up of radioiodine refractory thyroid cancer (RR-TC). Methods Forty-six 2-[18F]FDGPET/CT scans from 14 RR-TC patients were considered. Thyroid function tests: thyroglobulin (Tg), levothyroxine (LT4), and tyrosine-kinases inhibitors (TKIs) assumptions were recorded. Metabolic tumour volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were calculated from each scan and correlated with clinical parameters and the overall survival (OS). Results Baseline TLG and MTV predicted OS (p = 0.027 and p = 0.035), and negative correlation with OS was also confirmed when the same parameters were measured in follow-up scans (p = 0.015 and p = 0.021). Tg also correlated with the OS; (p = 0.014; p = 0.019 and p = 0.009). However, TLG and MTV were not significantly correlated with Tg levels. MTV and TLG variation in time were reduced during TKI therapy (p = 0.045 and p = 0.013). Conclusions 2-[18F]FDGPET/CT confirmed its prognostic role at the first assessment and during the follow-up of RR-TC patients. 2-[18F]FDGPET/CT parameters seem at least partially independent from Tg. TKI therapy resulted in a measurable effect on the variation of 2-[18F]FDGPET/CT parameters over time.

1. Introduction

Advanced or metastatic radioiodine-refractory thyroid cancer (RR-TC) is a rare entity and its definition is still evolving [1]. To date, RR-TC is defined as a follicular-cell derived thyroid cancer no longer able to trap radioiodine or showing preserved radioiodine avidity only in some sites, or even displaying progression despite 131I treatments [1,2]. Its clinical management is therefore challenging, resulting in a poor prognosis [2,3,4,5]. The availability of tyrosine-kinases inhibitors (TKIs), in particular lenvatinib and sorafenib, radically changed the therapeutic approach to RR-TC, achieving in many cases the reduction of tumour burden and significantly improving the progression free survival (PFS) [6,7,8]. On the other hand, the efficacy of TKIs has to be balanced with their side effects, which could lead to dose reductions or even temporary or permanent drug discontinuation in a significant number of patients [9,10].
On this basis, effective follow-up strategies and imaging techniques are needed in order to assess progression, response rate, and duration, and to better define patients’ management. Computed tomography (CT) scan represents the gold standard imaging technique both at the time of therapy initiation and during the follow-up [2,3,4,5], and tumour shrinkage assessed through RECIST 1.1 criteria is considered to measure the response to TKIs [11].
On the other hand, thyroglobulin (Tg) concentration and doubling time (Tg-DT) proved to have a prognostic value in RR-TC [12,13], and it is presently used as a complementary tool in monitoring drug response profile. Nevertheless, in some cases, Tg could lose its reliability as a marker of disease, due to the possibility of cell dedifferentiation.
Of note, Tg variations are not always consistent with CT scans findings. In particular, after TKIs initiation, the drop of the Tg is not always consistent with the radiological response, and conversely a CT documented progressive disease might also not be associated with the raising Tg levels [14].
In this scenario, [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (2-[18F]FDGPET)/CT could improve prognostic stratification of patients with RR-DTC, providing insights into tumour glucose consumption and aggressiveness [15]. In the clinical practice, the report of 2-[18F]FDGPET is most often based on a visual/qualitative assessment and further supported by the use of SUVmax as a readily available semi-quantitative measure [16]. However, other 2-[18F]FDGPET-derived parameters have been proposed to better capture the extent (metabolic volume of the tumour, MTV) and intensity (total lesion glycolysis, TLG) of the metabolically active disease burden. These variables have shown a potential additional value in several oncological diseases, even in those which are not characterized by high metabolic activity at disease onset, including DTCs [15]. Ahmaddy et al. even suggested that 2-[18F]FDG -PET/CT might outweigh the CT scan in the evaluation of the treatment response in patients with advanced RR-DTC undergoing TKI therapy. These authors claimed 2-[18F]FDGPET may play a role in the early assessment of the response to the treatment, identifying those patients who will most likely benefit from it [17]. Similar findings were reported by Valerio et al., showing basal 2-[18F]FDGPET to be predictive of the response to TKIs and correlated with the OS [18].
Given these premises, we aimed to retrospectively evaluate the predictive value of a serial assessment of 2-[18F]FDGPET/CT parameters in a cohort of RR-TC patients, and their correlation with Tg and thyroid function tests.

2. Materials and Methods

All 2-[18F]FDGPET/CT performed in RR-TC patients between 2009 and 2019 in IRCCS Policlinico San Martino Hospital were evaluated. At the time of each examination, thyroid axis as well as Tg values were recorded, and the ongoing therapies were reported, with specific regard to the levothyroxine (LT4) dosage and TKIs administration. Patients’ clinical history and previous cancer treatments were also recorded, and data concerning the overall survival after the exam were subsequently registered.
All the patients signed a written informed consent before each examination. Data collection, as well as the subsequent analysis, were performed in compliance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration. Regional Independent Ethical Committee (IRB) approved the study.

2.1. 2-[18F]FDGPET/CT Acquisition

2-[18F]FDG PET/CT was performed according to the international guidelines (16) using a 16-slices PET/CT hybrid system (Biograph 16, Siemens Medical Solutions, Knoxville, TN, USA). Briefly, patients fasted overnight prior to the intravenous administration of 300–400 MBq of FDG, which was performed in a quiet room, with the patient lying in a recumbent position and instructed not to move. Blood glucose was measured before tracer injection, as to ensure blood glucose levels <160 mg/dL. To minimize artifacts caused by the urinary tract, patients were asked to drink 500 mL of water 1 h prior to image acquisition and to empty the bladder just before the acquisition start. Imaging started 60 ± 15 min after intravenous tracer administration. The technical parameters of the 16-detector row, helical CT scanner included a gantry rotation speed of 0.5 s and table speed of 24 mm per gantry rotation. The PET component of the combined imaging system had an axial view of 16.2 cm per bed position, with an interslice spacing of 3.75 mm. The trans-axial field of view and pixel size of the reconstructed PET images were 58.5 cm and 4.57 mm, respectively, with a matrix size of 128 × 128. Unenhanced low-dose CT was performed at 140 kV and 40 mA for attenuation correction of emissive data and anatomical localization of PET dataset. An emissive scan was performed in 3D mode, shortly after CT acquisition, with a 3-min acquisition per bed position. PET sinograms were reconstructed by means of ordered-subset expectation maximization (OSEM) iterative reconstruction algorithm (three iterations, eight subsets). A scan was performed starting from the orbital plane on to the mid-thigh, except for the cases where the clinical history demanded a whole body, vertex-to-toes scan.

2.2. Image Analysis

2-[18F]FDGPET/CT images were interpreted in consensus by two expert nuclear medicine physicians blinded to biochemical and clinical results, as well as to the results of other imaging procedures. From the attenuation-corrected FDG PET images, the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the hottest lesion was obtained in the transaxial view. Further, a volume of interest was drawn using an SUV-based automated contouring program (Syngo Siemens workstation, Siemens Medical Solutions, Princeton, NJ, USA) with an volumetric region of interest based on a 3D isocontour at 41% of the maximum pixel value (SUVmax), as previously recommended [16]. Total Metabolic Tumor Volume (MTV) was obtained by the sum of MTV values of all patients’ lesions. Total Lesion Glycolysis (TLG) was computed as the sum of TLG of every lesion for each patient (thus corresponding for each patient, to the sum of the VOI average/mean SUV value for each lesion multiplied by corresponding MTV).

2.3. Laboratory Tests

Serum Tg was assayed through immuno-chemiluminescence (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). Analytical sensitivity of the method was 0.04 ng/mL. TSH and fT4 were measured by means of ultrasensitive immuno-chemiluminescence methods (Roche Diagnostics). Normality ranges were 0.3–4.2 mIU/L for TSH and 9.3–17.0 pg/mL for fT4.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was carried out by means of MedCalc Portable Launcher software, version 2.2.0.0; the same program was used to create all figures and graphs. Parametric distribution of the variables was assessed through the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, and data were reported as mean ± standard deviation (95% CI of the mean) if parametric, or median (range, 95% CI of the median) if non-parametric.
The association among non-quantitative data were assessed through the Chi-squared test. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between each variable and the OS, and Kaplan–Meier curves to assess the difference of OS among groups. The correlation among quantitative variables was assessed by means of Spearman rank correlation test, while linear regression test was used to investigate the relationship between thyroid function tests, LT4, Tg, and 2-[18F]FDGPET/CT parameters. As regards the TSH, it was considered as a continuous rather than a dicotomic variable (suppressed/unsuppressed); for this reason, patients with unsuppressed TSH were included in the analysis together with those who had it suppressed. In order to assess 2-[18F]FDGPET/CT parameters variation, the ratio between the values registered at the subsequent and the previous scan was considered; this parameter could not be assessed for patients who had a single 2-[18F]FDGPET/CT scan. Mann–Whitney test was used to compare 2-[18F]FDGPET/CT parameters variation in the periods in which TKI was administered to those in which no therapy was given. Lastly, sensitivity and specificity in predicting 1-year OS were calculated by means of ROC curves. p values < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.

3. Results

Overall, out of 684 patients followed between 2009 and 2019, 46 2-[18F]FDGPET/CT scans were collected from 14 patients. Out of them, five were females, the mean age at diagnosis was 65.0 (±12.2, 95% CI 57.9 to 72.0), while at the time of the first scan it was 69.7 (±10.6, 95% CI 63.5 to 75.8). Surgery was performed in all but one patient: a total thyroidectomy in the majority of cases (64.3%), combined with central neck compartment lymphadenectomy in 7.1% or central and lateral neck compartment lymphadenectomy in 21.4%. In one elderly patient, surgery was not performed due to the local extension of the disease and the clinical status; therefore, only external radiotherapy was delivered.
The most prevalent histology was follicular thyroid cancer (eight patients), while a papillary carcinoma was reported in four patients, and poorly differentiated thyroid cancer and the combination of papillary and Hurtle cell thyroid cancer in one patient each.
Radioiodine therapy was performed in all surgically-treated patients, with an average cumulative dose of 386.4 mCi (±292.4, 95% CI 200.6 to 572.2 mCi).

3.1. First 2-[18F]FDGPET Scan Assessment

At the time of the first scan, the median Tg was 1519.5 ng/mL (0.04 to 25,454.0, 95% CI 23.9 to 5788.6 ng/mL) and the mean administered LT4 dosage was 903.6 mcg/week (±298.7, 95% CI 731.1 to 1076.0 mcg/week). All but three subjects had suppressed TSH levels (median 0.093 mU/L, 0.005 to 4.700 mU/L, 95% CI 0.014 to 1.047 mU/L), and the mean fT4 was 17.46 pg/mL (±3.99, 95% CI 15.16 to 19.77 pg/mL).
The first 2-[18F]FDGPET was performed after a median of 29 months (range 3–416 months, 95% CI 5.13–104.37 months) from the diagnosis and LT4 therapy initiation. The distribution of the 2-[18F]FDGPET/CT exams among the study population is described in Table 1. As regards the initial assessment, median MTV at the first 2-[18F]FDGPET/CT scan was 18.90 cm3 (range 0.71–1197.3 cm3; 95% CI 3.52 to 58.87 cm3), while median TLG was 94.74 (5.33–10,632.20; 95% CI 23.71 to 644.75 SUV mean × cm3).

3.2. TKI Treatment

Lenvatinib was administered to 11 patients during the study period; among them, 8 had had a previous line of systemic therapy with sorafenib.
At the time of the data collection, 11 patients had died due to thyroid cancer progression, 2 were still in treatment with lenvatinib, and 1 had withdrawn lenvatinib therapy due to adverse events. Overall, three patients received sorafenib as the only systemic therapy, three had only lenvatinib, and eight received both the drugs.
A representation of TKI administration schedule with respect to the study period is provided in Table 2.

3.3. Overall Survival

The median OS from the first 2-[18F]FDGPET/CT scan was 25 months (range 7–53, CI 95% 12.92 to 39.35 months), while the follow up of the patients who were still alive at the time of data collection was 45, 31, and 44 months, respectively.
No association was found between the OS and histology (p = 0.349), type of surgery (p = 0.586), and administered radioiodine dosage (p = 0.545).
Conversely, cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed a predictive role of TLG (p = 0.027) and MTV (p = 0.035), performed at baseline, on the OS, while Tg values nearly approached statistical significance (p = 0.083). On the other hand, a negative correlation was found between basal Tg values at the first analysis and the OS (p = 0.036).
Differently from Tg (p = 0.145), TLG and MTV proved predictive of 1-year mortality (sensitivity 60%, specificity 100%, criterion > 817.8, AUC 0.812, p = 0.001; sensitivity 60%, specificity 96%, criterion > 126.7 cm3, p = 0.001, AUC 0.815).
The results of Cox regression analysis are listed in Table 3, whereas the sensitivity and specificity of each parameter in predicting 1-year-mortality are reported in Table 4.
Data from the whole 46 evaluations showed a negative correlation of both TSH and Tg levels with the OS (p = 0.014 and p = 0.019.) A positive correlation was recorded, instead, between the OS and fT4 (p = 0.009, Figure 1).
An improved overall survival was found in the group of patients who underwent two lines of TKIs compared to those who received only one (p = 0.005, Figure 2).

3.4. 2-[18F]FDGPET/CT Parameters Correlations

As regards 2-[18F]FDGPET/CT parameters, both TLG and MTV proved a negative correlation with the OS (p = 0.015 and p = 0.021, respectively).
Linear regression analysis showed an association between MTV values and TSH (R2 = 0.19, p = 0.006) and between MTV and fT4 (R2 = 0.13, p = 0.029). Conversely, Tg was not related to MTV (p = 0.869).
Also, TLG was associated to TSH and fT4 (R2 = 0.22, p = 0.005 and R2 = 0.12, p = 0.044, respectively).
No correlation was found between Tg and both MTV and TLG (p = 0.807 and p = 0.467, respectively). However, a correlation was found between Tg and MTV variation in time (p = 0.011), while not between Tg and TLG variation (p = 0.118).
A difference in terms of MTV variation was found between patients in treatment with TKIs and those who were not (median 0.88 vs. 2.73 cm3, p = 0.045). Similar findings were recorded for TLG (median 0.65 vs. 4.01, p = 0.013) and Tg variations (median 1.24 vs. 2.95, p = 0.047) (Figure 3).

4. Discussion

In our retrospective analysis, we evaluated the role of 2-[18F]FDGPET/CT in the management of RR-TC patients, in addition to Tg and CT scan assessment, which represent the gold standard tools for the follow-up of these patients [2,4]. Interestingly, 2-[18F]FDGPET/CT seems to provide information about the clinical course of the disease through a first single scan. This may be due to the insights about the cellular biological activity besides the anatomical tumour burden [19]. In this perspective, similar findings were obtained by Manohar et al. in their analysis, which included 62 RR-TC patients: MTV and TLG proved related to both the PFS and the OS, as well as Tg and Tg-DT [15].
On the other hand, differently from the abovementioned study, the present one was also aimed at investigating the performance of 2-[18F]FDGPET/CT during the follow-up, and even in this other setting the association with the OS was maintained.
A further intent of our analysis was to assess the impact on TKIs therapy on 2-[18F]FDGPET/CT parameters. In this regard, our data suggest a completely opposite trend in the evolution of the 2-[18F]FDGPET/CT parameters when patients were treated with TKIs compared to the periods in which the same patients were not. Particularly, for both MTV and TLG, a trend in reduction seemed to be present in the former (median of the ratios 0.88 and 0.65, respectively), while an increase was recorded in the latter (2.73 and 4.01, respectively), confirming the effect of these drugs in hindering cancer cell biology.
Data recently published by Valerio et al. seems consistent with these findings, showing a metabolic response in most of the patients who started lenvatinib and an improved OS in this group compared to those who did not achieve a response. In that study, on the other hand, a concomitant shrinkage was registered in the tumoral lesions of 22 out of the 24 patients showing a metabolic response, and in 60.6% of patients this was correlated with the biochemical response [18].
Data concerning cancer cell activity and metabolism, indeed, may represent an important tool especially when biochemical and morphological data diverge [14,20,21]. In most patients, a drop in Tg levels is observed after TKI initiation, but it is not always followed by a tumour size reduction at the CT scan [14,22]. On these bases, a multiparametric approach, comprehensive of either morphological, biochemical or metabolic data, could be advisable in evaluating tumour evolution in time. Moreover, while PET-determined non-responders proved lower PFS and disease-specific survival, only this last parameter resulted in association with the therapeutic failure according to RECIST [17].
Another aspect worth mentioning and which is still a matter of discussion, is the suitability of a further line of TKI after the failure of the first one: Our findings seem to support the use of TKIs in second line, in line with the data reported by other authors on this topic [23,24].
A correlation between 2-[18F]FDGPET/CT parameters and Tg was mentioned by Chai et al. in 2017; they found higher stimulated Tg levels to be predictive of the optimal diagnostic accuracy of the exam [21]. Leboulleux et al. in 2009 reported similar findings and highlighted the role of recombinant TSH stimulation in improving diagnostic performance of 2-[18F]FDGPET/CT [25]. On the other hand, data from other studies did not support the correlation between TSH levels and PET finings in RR-TC. In their recent prospective analysis, Almeida LS et al. failed to find a significant difference in SUVmax and in diagnostic accuracy of 2-[18F]FDGPET/CT performed during TSH stimulation in hormonal withdrawal compared to those in TSH-suppression. However, in this case, the study population was very small, and the correlation between TSH and SUVmax almost reached the statistical significance (p = 0.064) [26]. Furthermore, the previous meta-analysis published in 2010 by Ma et al. stated the role of TSH stimulation in improving diagnostic performance of 2-[18F]FDGPET in patients treated for a RR-DTC, with elevated Tg levels and a negative whole-body scintigraphy (WBS) scan [27].
On the other hand, the current evidence in literature suggests that a chronic TSH suppression might delay disease recurrence and improve the OS [4,28], and the hereby highlighted relationship between thyroid function tests and 2-[18F]FDGPET/CT parameters seems in keeping with that. However, the numerosity of the present sample prevents any clear conclusion on this issue.
Our data failed, instead, in demonstrating an association between Tg levels and 2-[18F]FDGPET/CT parameters, while a correlation was proved between Tg and MTV variation in time. This could be an important point to support the complementarity of the information provided by these tests. Tg represents, indeed, a prognostic factor in these patients, and in particular a short Tg-DT is correlated with a reduced OS [12,29]. Furthermore, as previously mentioned, stimulated Tg levels should be considered in discriminating which patients may deserve an 2-[18F]FDGPET/CT or CT scan [21,29,30]. On the other hand, the loss of cellular differentiation in thyroid cancer may lead to the dissociation between Tg levels and tumour progression [31,32].
The small number of patients enrolled is the main limitation of the present study; this is due to the rarity of the disease, beside the fact that these patients do not regularly undergo 2-[18F]FDGPET/CT. Nevertheless, the availability of a strict and long-term follow-up, during which either clinical, biochemical, or radiological data are provided and recorded, strengthens the study. Interestingly, most male patients were included in the present study. In this framework, it should be noted that the female prevalence characterizing the well differentiated disease is not always maintained in the poor differentiated and/or more aggressive disease [33,34].

5. Conclusions

2-[18F]FDGPET/CT confirmed its prognostic role both in the initial assessment and during the follow-up of patients with RR-TC. MTV and TLG seem at least somehow independent from Tg values, while a relationship might be present with the thyroid axis parameters. TKIs confirmed their efficacy as systemic therapy even in second line. TKIs also seem to impact 2-[18F]FDGPET/CT parameters, limiting their evolution in time. Further studies might be carried out to investigate their effect even in the improvement of the OS. In this perspective, 2-[18F]FDGPET/CT should be considered an important tool during the follow-up, which could integrate the information provided by other morphological and biochemical tests.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.G., D.F., M.A. and S.M.; methodology, S.G., S.R. and S.M.; investigation, all authors; data curation, all authors; writing—original draft preparation, S.G., M.A. and S.M.; writing—review and editing, all authors; visualization, all authors; funding acquisition, all authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from the Italian Ministry of Health—Ricerca Corrente 2022–2024.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Regional Independent Ethical Committee (IRB) approved the study. Registry number: 291/2021, authorization date 3 May 2021.

Informed Consent Statement

All the patients signed a written informed consent before each examination.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest related to this study.

References

  1. Tuttle, R.M.; Ahuja, S.; Avram, A.M.; Bernet, V.J.; Bourguet, P.; Daniels, G.H.; Dillehay, G.; Draganescu, C.; Flux, G.; Führer, D.; et al. Controversies, Consensus, and Collaboration in the Use of 131I Therapy in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: A Joint Statement from the American Thyroid Association, the European Association of Nuclear Medicine, the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, and the European Thyroid Association. Thyroid 2019, 29, 461–470. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Pacini, F.; Basolo, F.; Bellantone, R.; Boni, G.; Cannizzaro, M.A.; De Palma, M.; Durante, C.; Elisei, R.; Fadda, G.; Frasoldati, A.; et al. Italian consensus on diagnosis and treatment of differentiated thyroid cancer: Joint statements of six Italian societies. J. Endocrinol. Investig. 2018, 41, 849–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Schmidt, A.; Iglesias, L.; Klain, M.; Pitoia, F.; Schlumberger, M.J. Radioactive iodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer: An uncommon but challenging situation. Arch. Endocrinol. Metab. 2017, 61, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Haugen, B.R.; Alexander, E.K.; Bible, K.C.; Doherty, G.M.; Mandel, S.J.; Nikiforov, Y.E.; Pacini, F.; Randolph, G.W.; Sawka, A.M.; Schlumberger, M.; et al. American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Thyroid 2016, 26, 1–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Berdelou, A.; Borget, I.; Godbert, Y.; Nguyen, T.; Garcia, M.E.; Chougnet, C.N.; Ferru, A.; Buffet, C.; Chabre, O.; Huillard, O.; et al. Lenvatinib for the Treatment of Radioiodine-Refractory Thyroid Cancer in Real-Life Practice. Thyroid 2018, 28, 72–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Schlumberger, M.; Tahara, M.; Wirth, L.J.; Robinson, B.; Brose, M.S.; Elisei, R.; Habra, M.A.; Newbold, K.; Shah, M.H.; Hoff, A.O.; et al. Lenvatinib versus placebo in radioiodine-refractory thyroid cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 372, 621–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Brose, M.S.; Nutting, C.M.; Jarzab, B.; Elisei, R.; Siena, S.; Bastholt, L.; de la Fouchardiere, C.; Pacini, F.; Paschke, R.; Shong, Y.K.; et al. Sorafenib in radioactive iodine-refractory, locally advanced or metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer: A randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2014, 384, 319–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. De Leo, S.; Di Stefano, M.; Persani, L.; Fugazzola, L.; Colombo, C. Lenvatinib as first-line treatment for advanced thyroid cancer: Long progression-free survival. Endocrine 2020, 72, 462–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wirth, L.J.; Tahara, M.; Robinson, B.; Francis, S.; Brose, M.S.; Habra, M.A.; Newbold, K.; Kiyota, N.; Dutcus, C.E.; Mathias, E.; et al. Treatment-emergent hypertension and efficacy in the phase 3 Study of (E7080) lenvatinib in differentiated cancer of the thyroid (SELECT). Cancer 2018, 124, 2365–2372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Haddad, R.I.; Schlumberger, M.; Wirth, L.J.; Sherman, E.J.; Shah, M.H.; Robinson, B.; Dutcus, C.E.; Teng, A.; Gianoukakis, A.G.; Sherman, S.I. Incidence and timing of common adverse events in Lenvatinib-treated patients from the SELECT trial and their association with survival outcomes. Endocrine 2017, 56, 121–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Robinson, B.; Schlumberger, M.; Wirth, L.J.; Dutcus, C.E.; Song, J.; Taylor, M.H.; Kim, S.B.; Krzyzanowska, M.K.; Capdevila, J.; Sherman, S.I.; et al. Characterization of Tumor Size Changes over Time from the Phase 3 Study of Lenvatinib in Thyroid Cancer. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2016, 101, 4103–4109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Wassermann, J.; Bernier, M.O.; Spano, J.P.; Lepoutre-Lussey, C.; Buffet, C.; Simon, J.M.; Ménégaux, F.; Tissier, F.; Leban, M.; Leenhardt, L. Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Radioiodine Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Carcinomas. Oncologist 2016, 21, 50–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Song, E.; Kim, M.; Kim, E.Y.; Kim, B.H.; Shin, D.Y.; Kang, H.C.; Ahn, B.C.; Kim, W.B.; Shong, Y.K.; Jeon, M.J.; et al. Lenvatinib for Radioactive Iodine-Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma and Candidate Biomarkers Associated with Survival: A Multicenter Study in Korea. Thyroid 2020, 30, 732–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Werner, R.A.; Lückerath, K.; Schmid, J.S.; Higuchi, T.; Kreissl, M.C.; Grelle, I.; Reiners, C.; Buck, A.K.; Lapa, C. Thyroglobulin fluctuations in patients with iodine-refractory differentiated thyroid carcinoma on lenvatinib treatment-initial experience. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 28081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Manohar, P.M.; Beesley, L.J.; Bellile, E.L.; Worden, F.P.; Avram, A.M. Prognostic Value of FDG-PET/CT Metabolic Parameters in Metastatic Radioiodine-Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2018, 43, 641–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Boellaard, R.; Delgado-Bolton, R.; Oyen, W.J.; Giammarile, F.; Tatsch, K.; Eschner, W.; Verzijlbergen, F.J.; Barrington, S.F.; Pike, L.C.; Weber, W.A.; et al. FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: Version 2.0. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2015, 42, 328–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ahmaddy, F.; Burgard, C.; Beyer, L.; Koehler, V.F.; Bartenstein, P.; Fabritius, M.P.; Geyer, T.; Wenter, V.; Ilhan, H.; Spitzweg, C.; et al. 18F-FDG-PET/CT in Patients with Advanced, Radioiodine Refractory Thyroid Cancer Treated with Lenvatinib. Cancers 2021, 13, 317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Valerio, L.; Guidoccio, F.; Giani, C.; Tardelli, E.; Puccini, G.; Puleo, L.; Minaldi, E.; Boni, G.; Elisei, R.; Volterrani, D. [18F]-FDG-PET/CT Correlates with the Response of Radiorefractory Thyroid Cancer to Lenvatinib and Patient Survival. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2021, 106, 2355–2366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wahl, R.L.; Jacene, H.; Kasamon, Y.; Lodge, M.A. From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors. J. Nucl. Med. 2009, 50 (Suppl. S1), 122S–150S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Ora, M.; Nazar, A.H.; Pradhan, P.K.; Mishra, P.; Barai, S.; Arya, A.; Dixit, M.; Parashar, A.; Gambhir, S. The Utility of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Patients with Biochemical Recurrence and Negative Whole-Body Radioiodine Scintigraphy and Evaluation of the Possible Role of a Limited Regional Scan. Indian J. Nucl. Med. 2020, 35, 203–209. [Google Scholar]
  21. Chai, H.; Zhang, H.; Yu, Y.L.; Gao, Y.C. Optimal threshold of stimulated serum thyroglobulin level for 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging in patients with thyroid cancer. J. Huazhong Univ. Sci. Technolog. Med. Sci. 2017, 37, 429–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Masaki, C.; Sugino, K.; Saito, N.; Saito, Y.; Tanaka, T.; Ogimi, Y.; Maeda, T.; Osaku, T.; Akaishi, J.; Hames, K.Y.; et al. Lenvatinib induces early tumor shrinkage in patients with advanced thyroid carcinoma. Endocr. J. 2017, 64, 819–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Kish, J.K.; Chatterjee, D.; Wan, Y.; Yu, H.T.; Liassou, D.; Feinberg, B.A. Lenvatinib and Subsequent Therapy for Radioactive Iodine-Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: A Real-World Study of Clinical Effectiveness in the United States. Adv. Ther. 2020, 37, 2841–2852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Brilli, L.; Dalmiglio, C.; Pilli, T.; Barbato, F.; Maino, F.; Capezzone, M.; Cartocci, A.; Castagna, M.G. Improvement of Overall Survival Using TKIs as Salvage Therapy in Advanced Thyroid Carcinoma: Real-Life Data on a Single Center Experience. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Leboulleux, S.; Schroeder, P.R.; Busaidy, N.L.; Auperin, A.; Corone, C.; Jacene, H.A.; Ewertz, M.E.; Bournaud, C.; Wahl, R.L.; Sherman, S.I.; et al. Assessment of the incremental value of recombinant thyrotropin stimulation before 2-[18F]-Fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging to localize residual differentiated thyroid cancer. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2009, 94, 1310–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Almeida, L.S.; Araújo, M.L.; Santos, A.O.; Montali da Assumpção, L.V.; Lima, M.L.; Ramos, C.D.; Zantut-Wittmann, D.E.; Etchebehere, E.C. Head-to-head comparison of F-18 FDG PET/CT in radioidine refractory thyroid cancer patients with elevated versus suppressed TSH levels a pilot study. Heliyon 2020, 6, e03450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ma, C.; Xie, J.; Lou, Y.; Gao, Y.; Zuo, S.; Wang, X. The role of TSH for 18F-FDG-PET in the diagnosis of recurrence and metastases of differentiated thyroid carcinoma with elevated thyroglobulin and negative scan: A meta-analysis. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2010, 163, 177–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Carhill, A.A.; Litofsky, D.R.; Ross, D.S.; Jonklaas, J.; Cooper, D.S.; Brierley, J.D.; Ladenson, P.W.; Ain, K.B.; Fein, H.G.; Haugen, B.R.; et al. Long-Term Outcomes following Therapy in Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma: NTCTCS Registry Analysis 1987–2012. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2015, 100, 3270–3279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Na, S.J.; Yoo, I.R.; O, J.H.; Lin, C.; Lin, Q.; Kim, S.H.; Chung, S.K. Diagnostic accuracy of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in differentiated thyroid cancer patients with elevated thyroglobulin and negative (131)I whole body scan: Evaluation by thyroglobulin level. Ann. Nucl. Med. 2012, 26, 26–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Albano, D.; Tulchinsky, M.; Dondi, F.; Mazzoletti, A.; Lombardi, D.; Bertagna, F.; Giubbini, R. Thyroglobulin doubling time offers a better threshold than thyroglobulin level for selecting optimal candidates to undergo localizing [18F]FDG PET/CT in non-iodine avid differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2021, 48, 461–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Harach, H.R.; Franssila, K.O. Thyroglobulin immunostaining in follicular thyroid carcinoma: Relationship to the degree of differentiation and cell type. Histopathology 1988, 13, 43–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Liu, Y. The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the follow-up of well-differentiated thyroid cancer with negative thyroglobulin but positive and/or elevated antithyroglobulin antibody. Nucl. Med. Commun. 2016, 37, 577–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Nilubol, N.; Zhang, L.; Kebebew, E. Multivariate analysis of the relationship between male sex, disease-specific survival, and features of tumor aggressiveness in thyroid cancer of follicular cell origin. Thyroid 2013, 23, 695–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hei, H.; Zhou, B.; Gong, W.; Zheng, C.; Qin, J. Male patients with papillary thyroid cancer have a higher risk of extranodal extension. Int. J. Clin. Oncol. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Diagnostics 12 00506 g001 550
Figure 1. Diagram showing the association between fT4 levels (pg/mL) and the overall survival (months) (Spearman rank correlation, ρ = 0.457, p = 0.009).
Figure 1. Diagram showing the association between fT4 levels (pg/mL) and the overall survival (months) (Spearman rank correlation, ρ = 0.457, p = 0.009).
Diagnostics 12 00506 g001
Diagnostics 12 00506 g002 550
Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier curves comparing the overall survival (months) of patients who were treated with two lines of tyrosine-kinases inhibitors (continuous line) versus those who received only one (dashed line). A significant gain was proved in the formers.
Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier curves comparing the overall survival (months) of patients who were treated with two lines of tyrosine-kinases inhibitors (continuous line) versus those who received only one (dashed line). A significant gain was proved in the formers.
Diagnostics 12 00506 g002
Diagnostics 12 00506 g003 550
Figure 3. Comparison of MTV and TLG variation (value at the subsequent evaluation/value at the previous evaluation) between the scan performed during tyrosine-kinases inhibitors therapy and those without systemic therapy. In the first group, both MTV and TLG showed a trend of reduction, while in the second one it tended to increase (Mann–Whitney test, median 0.88 vs. 2.73 cm3, p = 0.045, for MTV; median 0.65 vs. 4.01, p = 0.013 for TLG).
Figure 3. Comparison of MTV and TLG variation (value at the subsequent evaluation/value at the previous evaluation) between the scan performed during tyrosine-kinases inhibitors therapy and those without systemic therapy. In the first group, both MTV and TLG showed a trend of reduction, while in the second one it tended to increase (Mann–Whitney test, median 0.88 vs. 2.73 cm3, p = 0.045, for MTV; median 0.65 vs. 4.01, p = 0.013 for TLG).
Diagnostics 12 00506 g003
Table
Table 1. Study population; clinical characteristics at baseline 2-[18F]FDGPET evaluation.
Table 1. Study population; clinical characteristics at baseline 2-[18F]FDGPET evaluation.
PatientsAge SexHistologyTKITSH *
(mU/L)		fT4 **
(pg/mL)		Tg **
(ng/mL)		LT4
(µg/Week)		MTV *
(cm3)		TLG*OS
(Months)		N° FDG-PET
163FFTC-0.8914.22283.010501.566.88356
277MPTCL0.0322.21.1900126.67700.48534
379MFTC-0.0122.420,583.2110031.13377.92252
467MFTCS0.1518.726.3105025.00314.17395
571MPTCS0.0618.82237.111253.27--4
670FFTCL0.0222.12014.58500.715.34-1
743MFTCS0.0121.0698.914007.2545.96415
876MPTCS0.1715.1532.410503.5527.16395
981MHC+PTCS2.4412.31025.222550.98-152
1068FFTCS0.1319.58853.36504.0422.99142
1153MFTC-4.7010.55431.710501197.3210,632.2073
1277FFTCS0.0117.725,454.2825238.881748.6081
1376FPDTC-2.4112.30.145027.44143.51182
1475MPTC-0.0117.83.892512.8044.42-4
(TKIs: tyrosine-kinases inhibitors; Tg: thyroglobulin; LT4: administered levothyroxine dosage per week; MTV: metabolic tumour volume; TLG: total lesion glycolysis; OS: overall survival); * approximated to two decimals; ** approximated to one decimal.
Table
Table 2. The distribution of TKIs therapies among the study population and with regards to the study period.
Table 2. The distribution of TKIs therapies among the study population and with regards to the study period.
Before the Study PeriodAt the Time of the First 18F-FDG PET ScanDuring the Study Period
1sorafenibnolenvatinib
2sorafeniblenvatiniblenvatinib
3sorafenibnolenvatinib
4sorafenibsorafeniblenvatinib
5sorafenibsorafeniblenvatinib
6lenvatiniblenvatinib-
7sorafenibsorafeniblenvatinib
8sorafenibsorafeniblenvatinib
9sorafenibsorafeniblenvatinib
10sorafenibsorafenibno
11nonosorafenib
12sorafenibsorafenib-
13nonolenvatinib
14nonolenvatinib
Table
Table 3. Table reporting the results of Cox regression analysis of variables predicting the OS.
Table 3. Table reporting the results of Cox regression analysis of variables predicting the OS.
Null Model-2 Log LikelihoodFull Model-2 Log LikelihoodChi-SquaredDFSignificance Level
MTV35.5831.474.431p = 0.035
TLG30.7825.924.861p = 0.027
TSH35.5829.775.811p = 0.016
fT435.5831.593.991p = 0.046
Tg35.5832.582.991p = 0.083
RAI dosage30.7830.460.321p = 0.545
Table
Table 4. Table reporting the results of ROC curves analysis performed on all variables with respect to 1-year-survival. As regards the associated criterion, values are to be expressed in cm3 for the MTV, mU/L for the TSH, pg/mL for the fT4, ng/mL for the Tg, and mCi for the RAI dosage.
Table 4. Table reporting the results of ROC curves analysis performed on all variables with respect to 1-year-survival. As regards the associated criterion, values are to be expressed in cm3 for the MTV, mU/L for the TSH, pg/mL for the fT4, ng/mL for the Tg, and mCi for the RAI dosage.
AUCSignificance LevelYouden Index
(J)		Associated CriterionSensitivity
%		Specificity
%
MTV0.8150.0010.56>126.676096
TLG0.8120.0010.60>817.8660100
TSH0.7080.1330.47>0.476781
fT40.7630.0100.54≤17.6810054
Tg0.6750.1450.48>1253.07573
RAI dosage0.5630.7930.37≤50010037
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gay, S.; Raffa, S.; De’Luca di Pietralata, A.; Bauckneht, M.; Vera, L.; Miceli, A.; Albertelli, M.; Morbelli, S.; Giusti, M.; Ferone, D. 2-[18F]FDG PET in the Management of Radioiodine Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer in the Era of Thyrosin-Kinases Inhibitors: A Real-Life Retrospective Study. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 506. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020506

AMA Style

Gay S, Raffa S, De’Luca di Pietralata A, Bauckneht M, Vera L, Miceli A, Albertelli M, Morbelli S, Giusti M, Ferone D. 2-[18F]FDG PET in the Management of Radioiodine Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer in the Era of Thyrosin-Kinases Inhibitors: A Real-Life Retrospective Study. Diagnostics. 2022; 12(2):506. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020506

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gay, Stefano, Stefano Raffa, Anna De’Luca di Pietralata, Matteo Bauckneht, Lara Vera, Alberto Miceli, Manuela Albertelli, Silvia Morbelli, Massimo Giusti, and Diego Ferone. 2022. "2-[18F]FDG PET in the Management of Radioiodine Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer in the Era of Thyrosin-Kinases Inhibitors: A Real-Life Retrospective Study" Diagnostics 12, no. 2: 506. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020506

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop