Next Article in Journal
Maternal Copy Number Imbalances in Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing: Do They Matter?
Previous Article in Journal
Performance of the Deep Neural Network Ciloctunet, Integrated with Open-Source Software for Ciliary Muscle Segmentation in Anterior Segment OCT Images, Is on Par with Experienced Examiners
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Interesting Images

Systemic Lymphadenopathic Mastocytosis with Eosinophilia

1
Department of Pathology, St. Vincent’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Internal Medicine, St. Vincent’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea
3
Department of Pathology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2022, 12(12), 3057; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12123057
Submission received: 14 November 2022 / Revised: 30 November 2022 / Accepted: 4 December 2022 / Published: 6 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics)

Abstract

:
Systemic mastocytosis is a neoplastic proliferation of mast cells that most frequently involves cutaneous sites. Mastocytosis involves various extracutaneous sites, but the lymph node is rare. We present an interesting image of systemic mastocytosis in the lymph node with marked eosinophilia. It is a rare subtype of systemic mastocytosis requiring high suspicion levels for the correct diagnosis.

Figure 1. The lymph node demonstrates an interfollicular and sinusoidal proliferation of pale oval cells and abundant eosinophilic aggregates (A, H&E stain, ×20). It has a granuloma-like pattern with delicate sclerosis (B, H&E stain, ×200) and eosinophilic microabscesses (C, H&E stain, ×100). The neoplastic cells have medium-sized with clear or pinking moderate cytoplasm. The nucleus of some cells shows a vesicular nuclear membrane and distinguishable nucleoli (D, H&E stain, ×630). The neoplastic cells are confirmed as mast cells expressing tryptase (E, ×200) and having basophilic cytoplasmic granules (F, toluidine blue stain, ×630).
Figure 1. The lymph node demonstrates an interfollicular and sinusoidal proliferation of pale oval cells and abundant eosinophilic aggregates (A, H&E stain, ×20). It has a granuloma-like pattern with delicate sclerosis (B, H&E stain, ×200) and eosinophilic microabscesses (C, H&E stain, ×100). The neoplastic cells have medium-sized with clear or pinking moderate cytoplasm. The nucleus of some cells shows a vesicular nuclear membrane and distinguishable nucleoli (D, H&E stain, ×630). The neoplastic cells are confirmed as mast cells expressing tryptase (E, ×200) and having basophilic cytoplasmic granules (F, toluidine blue stain, ×630).
Diagnostics 12 03057 g001
Figure 2. The patient has multiple purpuric telangiectases around the neck skin (A). Mast cells with basophilic cytoplasmic granules are increased in the upper dermis of the lesion (B, H&E stain, ×400). C-Kit immunohistochemical stain highlights the infiltrating mast cells (C, ×200). In the bone marrow, multifocal compact aggregates of masts cells with paratrabecular and interstitial distributions are seen (D, H&E stain ×35). The abnormal mast cells contain spindle-shaped nuclei and clear cytoplasm and are associated with thin sclerotic fibers (E, H&E stain, ×400). CD25, which is not expressed in normal mast cells, is positive in these abnormal mast cells (F, ×200). A 64-year-old female patient was referred to the internal medicine clinic with an incidentally found mild splenomegaly and lymphadenopathy in the abdominal cavity during a health examination. She complained of mild abdominal discomfort and had a history of tuberculosis and cholecystectomy. Laboratory testing revealed a white blood cell count of 5.05 × 109/L with 26.3% eosinophils. Segmented neutrophils and lymphocytes were 39.4% and 30.1%, respectively. Hemoglobin was 11.1 g/dL, platelet count was 186 × 1012/L, and LDH was 90 U/L. Abdominal CT demonstrated lymphadenopathy along the entire abdominal cavity, especially in the mesenteric and paraaortic areas. They measured less than 0.7 cm in short diameter. Mesenteric lymph node excision was performed for the diagnosis. The lymph node revealed aggregates and infiltration of pale-staining cells, largely replacing interfollicular and sinusoidal spaces. Nodular aggregates of these cells resembled granuloma. They were accompanied by delicate sclerosis and numerous eosinophils (Figure 1A–D). Tumor cells expressed C-kit and tryptase (Figure 1E), but were negative for CD1a, langerin, S100, CD21, CD3, CD20, CD34, CD30, and myeloperoxidase. Toluidine blue stain showed scanty basophilic cytoplasmic granules (Figure 1F), but the granules were not apparent in the Giemsa stain. Accordingly, the diagnosis of systemic mastocytosis was favored. The subsequent physical examination discovered multiple purpuric telangiectases around the neck and chest skin (Figure 2A). The skin biopsy demonstrated mast cells with small basophilic granules infiltrating the upper dermis (Figure 2B). The bone marrow biopsy contained a nodular aggregate of atypical mast cells that were positive for CD25 and CD117, confirming the neoplastic nature of the mast cells (Figure 2D–F). Like the lymph node, abundant eosinophilic infiltration was prominent in the bone marrow. Cytogenetic analysis of the bone marrow revealed a normal female karyotype, and real-time PCR molecular studies showed a lack of BCR-ABL1 fusion, PDGFRa, and PDGFRb mutation. KIT gene harbored D816V mutation. Next-generation sequencing of the lymph node also demonstrated c.2447A>T p.(D816V) (VAF = 13.8%) mutation. The patient fulfilled the diagnostic criteria of systemic mastocytosis. It could be clinically subclassified as smoldering systemic mastocytosis because the patient had no C (‘cytoreduction-requiring’) findings and no evidence of an associated hematological neoplasm [1,2]. The patient is under watchful follow-up without active treatment and is stable one year after the diagnosis. Systemic mastocytosis is usually discovered initially in the bone marrow, and histology of the lymph node lesion is less familiar [3,4]. Lymphadenopathic mastocytosis with eosinophilia is a rare group of systemic mastocytosis that presents in ~10% of patients with systemic mastocytosis [5,6]. Clinical and morphologic features may be similar to myeloid and lymphoid neoplasms with PDGFRA rearrangement, and differential diagnosis between the two diseases by molecular studies is essential [7]. In the earlier classification of mastocytosis, lymphadenopathic systemic mastocytosis with eosinophilia was regarded as a separate mastocytosis category and categorized under aggressive systemic mastocytosis [8]. However, this term is no longer an official diagnosis in the current classification system [1,2]. Blood eosinophilia was shown to have a clinical significance, i.e., correlation with lymphadenopathy, dysmyeolopoiesis, WHO classification, and poor overall survival [9,10]. The present case demonstrates the classic yet rare image of lymphadenopathic mastocytosis. Granuloma-pattern morphology and abundant eosinophils could lead to other diagnoses, such as Langerhans cell histiocytosis. However, the correct diagnosis could be easily reached if clinicians and pathologists are aware of the diverse presentations of systemic mastocytosis.
Figure 2. The patient has multiple purpuric telangiectases around the neck skin (A). Mast cells with basophilic cytoplasmic granules are increased in the upper dermis of the lesion (B, H&E stain, ×400). C-Kit immunohistochemical stain highlights the infiltrating mast cells (C, ×200). In the bone marrow, multifocal compact aggregates of masts cells with paratrabecular and interstitial distributions are seen (D, H&E stain ×35). The abnormal mast cells contain spindle-shaped nuclei and clear cytoplasm and are associated with thin sclerotic fibers (E, H&E stain, ×400). CD25, which is not expressed in normal mast cells, is positive in these abnormal mast cells (F, ×200). A 64-year-old female patient was referred to the internal medicine clinic with an incidentally found mild splenomegaly and lymphadenopathy in the abdominal cavity during a health examination. She complained of mild abdominal discomfort and had a history of tuberculosis and cholecystectomy. Laboratory testing revealed a white blood cell count of 5.05 × 109/L with 26.3% eosinophils. Segmented neutrophils and lymphocytes were 39.4% and 30.1%, respectively. Hemoglobin was 11.1 g/dL, platelet count was 186 × 1012/L, and LDH was 90 U/L. Abdominal CT demonstrated lymphadenopathy along the entire abdominal cavity, especially in the mesenteric and paraaortic areas. They measured less than 0.7 cm in short diameter. Mesenteric lymph node excision was performed for the diagnosis. The lymph node revealed aggregates and infiltration of pale-staining cells, largely replacing interfollicular and sinusoidal spaces. Nodular aggregates of these cells resembled granuloma. They were accompanied by delicate sclerosis and numerous eosinophils (Figure 1A–D). Tumor cells expressed C-kit and tryptase (Figure 1E), but were negative for CD1a, langerin, S100, CD21, CD3, CD20, CD34, CD30, and myeloperoxidase. Toluidine blue stain showed scanty basophilic cytoplasmic granules (Figure 1F), but the granules were not apparent in the Giemsa stain. Accordingly, the diagnosis of systemic mastocytosis was favored. The subsequent physical examination discovered multiple purpuric telangiectases around the neck and chest skin (Figure 2A). The skin biopsy demonstrated mast cells with small basophilic granules infiltrating the upper dermis (Figure 2B). The bone marrow biopsy contained a nodular aggregate of atypical mast cells that were positive for CD25 and CD117, confirming the neoplastic nature of the mast cells (Figure 2D–F). Like the lymph node, abundant eosinophilic infiltration was prominent in the bone marrow. Cytogenetic analysis of the bone marrow revealed a normal female karyotype, and real-time PCR molecular studies showed a lack of BCR-ABL1 fusion, PDGFRa, and PDGFRb mutation. KIT gene harbored D816V mutation. Next-generation sequencing of the lymph node also demonstrated c.2447A>T p.(D816V) (VAF = 13.8%) mutation. The patient fulfilled the diagnostic criteria of systemic mastocytosis. It could be clinically subclassified as smoldering systemic mastocytosis because the patient had no C (‘cytoreduction-requiring’) findings and no evidence of an associated hematological neoplasm [1,2]. The patient is under watchful follow-up without active treatment and is stable one year after the diagnosis. Systemic mastocytosis is usually discovered initially in the bone marrow, and histology of the lymph node lesion is less familiar [3,4]. Lymphadenopathic mastocytosis with eosinophilia is a rare group of systemic mastocytosis that presents in ~10% of patients with systemic mastocytosis [5,6]. Clinical and morphologic features may be similar to myeloid and lymphoid neoplasms with PDGFRA rearrangement, and differential diagnosis between the two diseases by molecular studies is essential [7]. In the earlier classification of mastocytosis, lymphadenopathic systemic mastocytosis with eosinophilia was regarded as a separate mastocytosis category and categorized under aggressive systemic mastocytosis [8]. However, this term is no longer an official diagnosis in the current classification system [1,2]. Blood eosinophilia was shown to have a clinical significance, i.e., correlation with lymphadenopathy, dysmyeolopoiesis, WHO classification, and poor overall survival [9,10]. The present case demonstrates the classic yet rare image of lymphadenopathic mastocytosis. Granuloma-pattern morphology and abundant eosinophils could lead to other diagnoses, such as Langerhans cell histiocytosis. However, the correct diagnosis could be easily reached if clinicians and pathologists are aware of the diverse presentations of systemic mastocytosis.
Diagnostics 12 03057 g002

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, U.C.; methodology, S.I. and U.C.; resources, J.-A.K.; writing—original draft preparation, S.I. and U.C.; writing—review and editing, J.-A.K. and G.P.; visualization, U.C.; supervision, U.C.; project administration, U.C.; funding acquisition, U.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF- 2022R1I1A1A01071569).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical review and approval for this study were waived by the Ethics Committee of St.Vincent’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea due to it being a retrospective single case report (VC22ZISI0286).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Khoury, J.D.; Solary, E.; Alba, O.; Akkari, Y.; Alaggio, R. The 5th edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours: Myeloid and Histiocytic/Dendritic Neoplasms. Leukemia 2022, 36, 1703–1719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Arber, D.A.; Orazi, A.; Hasserjian, R.P.; Borowitz, M.J.; Calvo, K.R. International Consensus Classification of Myeloid Neoplasms and Acute Leukemias: Integrating morphologic, clinical, and genomic data. Blood 2022, 140, 1200–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Pardanani, A. Systemic mastocytosis in adults: 2021 Update on diagnosis, risk stratification and management. Am. J. Hematol. 2021, 96, 508–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Leguit, R.J.; Wang, S.A.; George, T.I.; Tzankov, A.; Orazi, A. The international consensus classification of mastocytosis and related entities. Virchows Arch. 2022. epub ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Horny, H.P.; Kaiserling, E.; Parwaresch, M.R.; Lennert, K. Lymph node findings in generalized mastocytosis. Histopathology 1992, 21, 439–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Frieri, M.; Linn, N.; Schweitzer, M.; Angadi, C.; Pardanani, B. Lymphadenopathic mastocytosis with eosinophilia and biclonal gammopathy. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 1990, 86, 126–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Bain, B.J. Myeloid and lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia and abnormalities of PDGFRA, PDGFRB or FGFR1. Haematologica 2010, 95, 696–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Swerdlow, S.; Campo, E.; Harris, N.L.; Jaffe, E.S.; Pileri, S.A. WHO Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissue, 4th ed.; IARC: Lyon, France, 2007; pp. 57–60. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kluin-Nelemans, H.C.; Reiter, A.; Illerhaus, A.; Anrooij, B.; Harmann, K. Prognostic impact of eosinophils in mastocytosis: Analysis of 2350 patients collected in the ECNM Registry. Leukemia 2020, 34, 1090–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Arock, M.; Hoermann, G.; Sotlar, K.; Orfao, A.; Metcalfe, D.D. Clinical impact and proposed application of molecular markers, genetic variants, and cytogenetic analysis in mast cell neoplasms: Status 2022. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2022, 149, 1855–1865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Im, S.; Kim, J.-A.; Park, G.; Cho, U. Systemic Lymphadenopathic Mastocytosis with Eosinophilia. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 3057. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12123057

AMA Style

Im S, Kim J-A, Park G, Cho U. Systemic Lymphadenopathic Mastocytosis with Eosinophilia. Diagnostics. 2022; 12(12):3057. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12123057

Chicago/Turabian Style

Im, Soyoung, Jeong-A Kim, Gyeongsin Park, and Uiju Cho. 2022. "Systemic Lymphadenopathic Mastocytosis with Eosinophilia" Diagnostics 12, no. 12: 3057. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12123057

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop