Next Article in Journal
A Survey on AI Techniques for Thoracic Diseases Diagnosis Using Medical Images
Next Article in Special Issue
Circulating Biomarkers for Laboratory Diagnostics of Atherosclerosis—Literature Review
Previous Article in Journal
Pulmonary Rehabilitation in SARS-CoV-2: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Post-Acute Patients
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cardiovascular Comorbidities in Relation to the Functional Status and Vitamin D Levels in Elderly Patients with Dementia
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Biomarkers in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

by
Silvana Elena Hojda
,
Irina Camelia Chis
* and
Simona Clichici
Department of Physiology, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Number 1–3, Clinicilor Street, RO-400023 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2022, 12(12), 3033; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12123033
Submission received: 16 October 2022 / Revised: 29 November 2022 / Accepted: 1 December 2022 / Published: 3 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Risk Factors and Biomarkers for Cardiovascular Disease)

Abstract

:
Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a severe medical condition characterized by elevated pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), right ventricular (RV) failure, and death in the absence of appropriate treatment. The progression and prognosis are strictly related to the etiology, biochemical parameters, and treatment response. The gold-standard test remains right-sided heart catheterization, but dynamic monitoring of systolic pressure in the pulmonary artery is performed using echocardiography. However, simple and easily accessible non-invasive assays are also required in order to monitor this pathology. In addition, research in this area is in continuous development. In recent years, more and more biomarkers have been studied and included in clinical guidelines. These biomarkers can be categorized based on their associations with inflammation, endothelial cell dysfunction, cardiac fibrosis, oxidative stress, and metabolic disorders. Moreover, biomarkers can be easily detected in blood and urine and correlated with disease severity, playing an important role in diagnosis, prognosis, and disease progression.

1. Introduction

There are five pulmonary hypertension (PH) groups, each of which is extensively described in the Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension recently published by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) [1]. Group 1 includes pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH)—a severe pathology characterized by pulmonary vasoconstriction, vascular remodeling, and vascular media hypertrophy, followed by in situ thrombosis; it progresses to an increase in pulmonary artery pressure, the release of molecular mediators in plasma and, ultimately, right-sided heart failure (HF) and death [2,3]. Group 1 PAH comprises several subcategories, from idiopathic PAH (IPAH) and toxicity-induced PAH to other forms of inherited PAH (HPAP) associated with connective tissue diseases (CTD–PAH) or congenital heart diseases (CHD–PAH). The prognosis of PAH is based on the hemodynamic and biological parameters used to evaluate RV failure, as well as on treatment response. Early identification of the disease, along with the correct stratification of PAH, is essential for patients at high risk of major cardiovascular events. Thus, biomarkers are among the non-invasive, relatively accessible assays used in the diagnosis and staging of the disease. The progression of PAH is dynamically monitored with the help of a transthoracic ultrasound, while cardiac catheterization remains the gold-standard test, having both diagnostic and prognostic utility. For this reason, the existence of non-invasive assays for patient evaluation is essential. Therefore, clinical research in this regard has become increasingly exhaustive in recent years, so new biomarkers correlated with disease severity and progression are constantly emerging for better patient evaluation.
There are several maladaptive mechanisms involved in PAH, including endothelial dysfunction, inflammation, oxidative stress, cardiac fibrosis, pathological RV remodeling, cellular hypoxia, metabolic imbalance, and in situ thrombosis; these are essential mechanisms, each with one or more corresponding biomarkers [4]. In this article, we intend to detail most of the markers involved in precapillary PAH induction, focusing on each mechanism individually, as shown in Table 1.
Table 1 presents biomarkers specific to different mechanisms involved in the onset of precapillary PAH.

2. Biomarkers Related to Heart Failure, Myocardial Stress and Injury, and Remodeling

Natriuretic peptides are molecules released by cardiac myocytes in response to increased heart pressure, volume overload [5], and wall stretching. Atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) is released from storage granules, and its secretion is stimulated by atrial volume overload and atrial stretching. Brain (B-type) natriuretic peptide (BNP) is a 32-amino-acid polypeptide secreted by ventricular tissue in response to ventricular stretching of cardiomyocytes and is more stable than ANP [6]. ANP and BNP are released as prehormones and act at the renal level by stimulating diuresis and natriuresis, and by relaxing the smooth vascular musculature with veno- and arteriodilatory effects [7]. In recent years, attention has focused on the N-terminal fragment of BNP (NT-proBNP) as an alternative biomarker of BNP, which provides the same information and is still preferred in clinical practice as it has a longer half-life, greater stability, and higher assay accuracy compared to BNP [8]. BNP and NT-proBNP correlate with hemodynamic parameters and the New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, being independent predictors for the stratification of mortality risk [1]. They are released in response to myocardial ischemia, hypoxia, and ventricular wall stress. Both BNP and NT-proBNP are markers for screening, diagnosis, and prognosis, and they are also used to monitor the state of patients with acute and chronic heart failure [9]. Regarding PAH patients, clinical studies have shown that ANP levels change in response to pulmonary vasodilator therapy [10]. Nagaya et al. [11] were the first to show that BNP plasma levels have prognostic value in IPAH. Over time, it has been demonstrated that the natriuretic peptides BNP and NT-proBNP remain the only markers recommended by the latest guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology [1] for diagnostic algorithms, as well as for risk stratification, providing prognostic information [12,13], and playing a significant role in monitoring the efficacy of specific treatments [13,14]. They are routinely used in all centers specializing in pulmonary hypertension for monitoring RV myocardial stress and progression to RV failure. NT-proBNP is correlated with hemodynamic parameters obtained in cardiac catheterization, echocardiographic parameters of RV overload, and the 6-min walk test (6MWT) [12]. Over time, several cutoff values have been proposed for BNP and NT-proBNP. The latest recommendations of the REVEAL registry include stratification into four risk-assessment strategies [12,15] (a method also accepted by the ESC guidelines [1]): BNP < 50 ng/L and NT-proBNP < 300 ng/L for low risk (<5% mortality risk after 1 year), BNP 50–199 ng/L and NT-proBNP 300–649 ng/L for intermediate–low risk (5–10%), BNP 200–800 ng/L and NT-proBNP 650–1100 ng/L for intermediate–high risk (10–20%), and BNP > 800 ng/L and NT–proBNP >1100 ng/L for high risk (>20% mortality risk after 1 year). Moreover, in the DETECT study (Detection of Pulmonary Hypertension in Systemic Sclerosis), NT-proBNP was used to stratify the risk of PAH in patients with systemic sclerosis [16], and it was also found to be correlated with hemodynamic parameters.
Serum cardiac troponins (cTn) are regulatory proteins of thin actin filaments of the cardiac muscle [12]. The disruption of the myocyte membrane determines their release into the bloodstream, and they can be detected with high sensitivity [17]. cTnI and cTnT are the main biomarkers used in the diagnosis and prognosis of acute myocardial infarction [18]. The development of high-sensitivity cTn assays has further increased the accuracy of detection in various chronic pathologies, such as ischemic heart disease, left-sided heart failure (HF), and renal failure; cTn can therefore be interpreted as an increased risk marker for morbidity and mortality [19]. Various studies have assessed two mechanisms by which cardiac troponins are released during RV failure and PAH: microcirculation impairment, and demand–perfusion mismatch. Clinical studies have highlighted a direct correlation between plasmatic troponin levels and increased pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), lower RV ejection fraction, lower mixed venous oxygen saturation (mvSatO2), and shorter 6MWT [17,20,21]. The presence of both cTnI and cTnT is associated with an increased mortality risk among patients with PAH [17,22]. Elevated levels of cTnI indicate patients with more advanced disease, constituting an independent prognostic role [21]. cTnT shows increased values only among patients with a reserved prognosis [22]. For this reason, the ESC guidelines recommend that troponin levels be measured both at the time of diagnosis and at least once per year or every time there is a clinical aggravation [1]. Therefore, it is not a marker of early disease, and the limitations regarding the interpretation of troponin levels in PAH are influenced by their association with renal failure or left-sided heart failure.
Protein ST2 is part of the toll interleukin 1 superfamily receptor and is found in two forms: the transmembrane ST2 ligand (ST2L) is expressed in inflammatory cells, cardiomyocytes, and the endothelium [23], along with the blood-soluble suppression of tumorigenicity from sST2. The ligand for ST2 is interleukin 33 (IL-33), and this paracrine system (IL-33/ST2) plays an antifibrotic protective role [24]. However, the sST2 protein prevents IL-33 from binding to ST2L, thereby disrupting this cardioprotective effect. Over time, increased sST2 plasma levels have proven to be associated with acute or chronic HF as well as cardiac pathological remodeling [25,26]. Consequently, sST2 may be considered as an additional biomarker for adverse outcomes in this category of patients [27]. Levels above 35 ng/mL in patients with HF are associated with a high risk of hospitalization and death at 1 year.
In PAH, elevated levels of sST2 are correlated with inflammation, fibrosis, and/or pathological RV remodeling [28]. Clinical studies published in the past few years have highlighted that sST2 levels are statistically significantly correlated with cardiac index, PVR, RV dysfunction, and higher mean pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP) [29]. In addition, they could reflect PAH severity with a sensitivity and specificity of 83.3% and 78.6%, respectively [30,31]. Therefore, sST2 can be considered an independent predictor of clinical worsening, it can be correlated with disease severity or therapeutic efficiency, and it plays a prognostic role, independent of age or renal function [4].
There are statistically significant correlations between sST2 and mean PAP, NT-proBNP, and 6MWT in patients with PAH or chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) [31,32]. Moreover, it has been shown that sST2 can be considered to be a marker for therapeutic response in CTEPH patients treated with balloon angioplasty [31]. As such, sST2 is a complex marker reflecting diseases of the pulmonary vascular system and heart. Increasing evidence suggests that sST2 is a candidate biomarker in the context of PAH [30], as well as for risk stratification in patients with RV failure due to PAH [29].
Cystatin C (CysC) is a highly sensitive endogenous marker of renal filtration, with an important role in myocardial remodeling, and is able to predict acute left HF and cardiovascular mortality [33]. Compared to BNP and NT-proBNP, CysC serum levels are independent of muscle mass, gender, and age [34]. Clinical studies have shown a significant correlation with RV ejection fraction in HF populations [35]. As for PAH, Fenster et al. [36] studied the correlation between RV failure and plasmatic cystatin C concentration in a small group of subjects with preserved renal function. CysC showed a statistically significant correlation with function, morphology, and RV systolic pressure, all of which supported its role as a potential biomarker of PAH. Furthermore, CysC predicts long-term mortality and clinical events in patients with PAH–CHD, and it may also contribute to clinical decision-making regarding treatment intensity [37] Because CysC is an indicator of glomerular filtration, there are currently no data related to the association of PAH with advanced renal failure. Further information is required in this regard.
Regarding homocysteine levels, there is little information in the specialized literature. Small studies have highlighted homocysteinemia among patients with PAH and CHD, but without a statistically significant correlation [38,39]. Total homocysteine levels in plasma may be an important factor in the pathogenesis of PAH [40], but large-scale clinical trials are necessary for homocysteine to be recommended as a diagnostic or prognostic marker.

3. Inflammation Markers

The inflammatory process is an important mechanism in PAH, induced by sympathetic hyperreactivity due to decreases in cardiac output in the RV. Moreover, it reflects the degree of pulmonary arterial remodeling. A variety of pro- and anti-inflammatory markers have been studied over time in PAH patients.
C-reactive protein (CRP) elevation is broadly established as a predictor of numerous cardiovascular diseases and different types of PAH [4]. In PAH, a direct correlation between CRP and NYHA class, 6MWT, and right atrial pressure has been highlighted [41]. In PAH–CHD, an increase of over 10 mg/mL has been associated with an increased risk of death, so CRP is a simple but powerful marker of mortality in CHD–PAH patients. It should therefore be integrated in risk stratification and routine evaluation of these patients [42]. In CTEPH patients, a decrease in CRP was observed 12 months after endarterectomy [41]. Accordingly, this anti-inflammatory marker could be used for prognosis as well as for guiding therapeutic response in PAH.
Red blood cell distribution width (RDW) is a constantly measured laboratory marker. Increased levels are associated with anisocytosis, underlinked to a non-specific inflammatory process [43]. Over time, it has been studied in patients with various cardiovascular diseases (e.g., coronary arterial disease [44], pulmonary embolism [45], HF [46]). As for PAH, RDW can be considered a prognostic marker in patients with IPAH, along with GDF-15, IL-6, creatinine, and NT-proBNP levels [47], since its plasma concentration is correlated with disease severity. Another study, which included 77 patients with PAH and CTEPH, revealed that RDW meets all of the criteria to be used as a potential prognostic biomarker, also showing a significant decrease after the escalation of targeted drugs for PAH and CTEPH [48]. Decreased RDW levels are associated with good treatment response and better prognosis, but further prospective studies are still necessary in order to better understand the value of RDW in precapillary PAH.
Growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) is a stress-responsive murine transforming growth factor-β-related cytokine that is highly expressed in the adult liver. It has recently been described as a non-specific inflammatory marker for various cardiovascular pathologies, as well as an independent prognostic marker in patients with acute pulmonary embolism and chronic left-sided HF. It is secreted in response to oxidative stress, inflammation, hypoxia, telomere erosion, and oncogene activation [49]. Moreover, it has been shown to be elevated in the sera of patients with IPAH. Nickel el al. [50] demonstrated that GDF-15 was abundantly expressed in the plexiform lesions of the pulmonary vascular endothelial cells, involved in both the apoptosis and the proliferation of the vascular pulmonary endothelium. In a group of 76 patients with IPAH, it was shown that GDF-15 can be considered an independent predictive marker of survival [50]. GDF-15 levels were correlated with biological (i.e., creatinine, uric acid, and NT-proBNP levels), clinical (i.e., NYHA class), functional (i.e., lower 6MWT), and hemodynamic parameters (i.e., mean right atrial and pulmonary capillary wedge pressures). High levels of GDF-15 are associated with an increased risk of mortality, independent of age or NT-proBNP; it is therefore a promising prognostic marker whose prognostic value should be detailed in future studies. Increased values have also been identified in the sera of patients with SSC–PAH, with GDF-15 levels positively correlated with PVR and plasma NT-proBNP levels [51].
Galectin-3 (GAL3), a beta-galactoside-binding lectin, is a mediator for inflammation and fibrosis that is expressed in macrophages, neutrophils, eosinophils, and endothelial cells in response to tissue damage [4]; its involvement in cardiac remodeling and fibrosis is well known, and it plays a prognostic and diagnostic role in chronic HF [52,53]. GAL3 is approved by the American Heart Association as a marker for risk stratification in class IIb HF [54]. There are few studies focusing on the relationship between GAL3 and PAH; however, small-group studies have highlighted that RV failure in patients with PAH is statistically significantly correlated with functional and morphological RV changes [55] and high GAL3 concentrations [56]. The data in this regard are still scarce, and further studies are required.
Cytokines are considered to be prognostic inflammatory markers in numerous pathologies. Circulating levels of cytokines have been reported in PAH, with an important role in its progression. Soon et al. [57] showed increased levels of pro-inflammatory serum cytokines (e.g., interferon-gamma; interleukin (IL)-1beta, -2, -4, -5, -6, -8, -10, -12p70, and -13; tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF–α)) in patients with IPAH and HPAH compared to the control group. Moreover, in the same study, IL-6, -8, -10, and -12p70 were prognostic markers associated with low survival rates in IPAH and HPAH [57]. This information is supported by another study that showed increased levels of IL-6, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-BB in patients with PAH [58].
Osteopontin (OPN) is a pleiotropic cytokine that, over time, has proven to be potentially related to mortality in PAH [59]. OPN levels were found to be correlated with age, 6MWT, NYHA class, mean right atrial pressure, and NT-proBNP in a study published by Lorenzen et al. in 2011 on patients with IPAH [59]. The data were also confirmed by Rosenberg et al. [60], who demonstrated that OPN is an independent prognostic marker of RV failure and pathological remodeling, most likely through its autocrine effect. Circulating OPN could be useful as a prognostic marker, in monitoring therapeutic response, and for improving risk stratification. Further studies on larger groups still need to be validated for use in clinical guidelines. Akin et al. emphasized another prognostic inflammatory marker, serum B-cell lymphoma 2 (sBCL2), found in high concentrations in children with PAH [61].
There is not as much information on the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) thus far. The first data related to the association between PAH and NLR appeared as early as 2013 [62]. Another study from that time highlighted that NLR could be correlated with the NYHA functional class and BNP in a small group of patients with PAH [63]. NLR ≥ 2.62 G/µL was associated with reduced five-year survival rates in PAH patients, with 69% sensitivity and 56% specificity [64]. Another recent study noted that high-NLR patients had lower 5-year transplant-free survival compared to the control group. Thus, NLR may be considered to be an independent predictor of survival, especially in women with PAH [65]. This simple marker could have prognostic value in PAH, but further studies are required in this direction.
Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) and its receptor CD74 are overexpressed in muscular pulmonary arterioles of patients with IPAH and contribute to the abnormal pro-inflammatory phenotype [66]. Treatment with the MIF antagonist ISO-1 or anti-CD74 neutralizing antibodies reduced inflammatory cell infiltration and, in addition, reversed the development of pulmonary hypertension in rats [66]. In patients with PAH secondary to systemic sclerosis, high concentrations of MIF have also been found [67]; therefore, in the future, MIF could be considered as a possible prognostic marker for this pathology.
Neopterin (NP) belongs to the pteridines class; it is an inflammatory marker released by dendritic cells and macrophages that interacts with reactive oxygen species (ROS) in response to oxidative stress [68]. Over time, increased values of NP have been highlighted in various cardiovascular diseases, including HF and coronary heart disease. NP is considered to be a prognostic marker for these pathologies [69]. Thus far, the data related to the involvement of NP in PAH are very limited, but it seems to amplify PAH through its effects on ROS. The plasma concentrations of NP were elevated in patients with PAH and inoperable CTEPH, which are associated with various clinical outcomes.
Adrenomedullin (ADM) is a potent hypotensive and vasorelaxant peptide that can reduce blood pressure and PVR and increase pulmonary blood flow [70]. The concentration of ADM increases in direct proportion to the severity of PAH, and circulating ADM is metabolized in the lungs. These data suggest that ADM plays an important role in pulmonary vascular tone [71]. A recent study showed that intravenous administration of ADM reduced precapillary pulmonary hypertension by decreasing plasma aldosterone concentrations [72]. As a result, ADM could be considered to be a promising endogenic peptide in PAH treatment, as well as a vasoprotective factor [71].

4. Endothelial Cell Dysfunction and Pulmonary Arterial Smooth Muscle Cell (PASMC) Proliferation

Asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) is a natural amino acid and an endogenous competitive inhibitor of nitric oxide (NO) synthase. Endothelial injury can increase its plasma concentration, resulting in decreased NO production, creating an inhibition of the NO/CGMP pathway with an increase in vascular tone. Reduced bioavailability of NO underlies the pathogenesis of pulmonary hypertension [73]. Over the years, clinical studies have highlighted the presence of ADMA in various cardiovascular pathologies, including myocardial infarction [74], CTEPH, and IPAH [73]. Several reports have shown high ADMA values in patients with IPAH, correlated with unfavorable pulmonary hemodynamics (e.g., PVR and CI) [75], but also in studies on patients with CTEPH [73] or CHD–PAH [38]. Increased serum ADMA levels could be used as an important prognostic marker, and in the mortality risk stratification and severity assessment of PAH.
Circulating angiogenic modulatory factors: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling is involved in vascular remodeling and, implicitly, in the pathogenesis of PAH [76]. Plasma levels are increased in patients with IPAH [77], and the VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR2) is overexpressed in plexiform vascular lesions. Soluble vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor 1 (sVEGFR1) was also studied for its role in PAH. The soluble form of VEGF receptor 1 (also called soluble FMS-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt-1)) was statistically significantly increased in patients with IPAH and CHD–PAH, being associated with the NYHA functional class [78]. The combination of sFlt-1 and PIGF has 83.7% sensitivity and 100% specificity for PAH [79]. In recent years, there has been an increased interest in connective tissue diseases (CTDs)—especially in the association between systemic sclerosis (SSc) and PAH. The potential role of these angiogenic circulating and inflammatory biomarkers in SSc screening is supported by numerous clinical studies, which have shown high levels of soluble vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor 1 (sVEGFR1) [78,79] in patients predisposed to the development of PAH [80]. A significant decrease under prostanoid therapy has also been described and is considered to be a biomarker of treatment response [81]. Kylhammar et al. [3] also highlighted that the plasma levels of sVEGFR1 were correlated with both disease progression and worse outcomes. The value of other angiogenic and inflammatory biomarkers, such as placental growth factor (PlGF) [80], VEGF-A, IL-6 [58], IL-12 [80], and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) [58], seemed to best discriminate SSc patients who were on the verge of developing PAH.
Aldosterone is a mineralocorticoid hormone synthesized in the zona glomerulosa of the adrenal gland in response to a decrease in circulating blood volume [81]. Its role in vascular remodeling and fibrosis is well known, with several mechanisms through which it determines its effects, including activation of pathways that decrease NO levels, stimulation of inflammation and cell proliferation, extracellular matrix remodeling, and fibrosis [55]. Its role in vascular remodeling in PAH has been studied both in experimental models [82] and in subgroups of patients, where it was shown that the remodeling of the pulmonary arterioles increases vascular tone, causing irreversible right-sided HF (cor pulmonale). Perivascular fibrosis is reduced through pharmacological inhibition of aldosterone, along with the improvement of cardiopulmonary hemodynamics. Thus, aldosterone can be considered a partially modifiable marker in pulmonary circulation-right ventricle dysfunction [83]. Other studies consider galectin-3 and aldosterone to be potential tandem biomarkers of idiopathic PAH (IPAH) or PAH associated with PAH–CTD [55].
Endothelin 1 (ET-1) is considered to be a potent vasoconstrictor that stimulates the proliferation and migration of pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells (PASMCs). In the clinical studies published in previous years, statistically significant correlations have been highlighted between increased levels of ET-1 and hemodynamic parameters (e.g., mean PAP, CI, and disease severity) [84]. At the same time, ET-1 could be considered to be an ideal prognostic marker for disease progression, its levels correlating with responses to PAH-specific treatments [85]. According to the latest guidelines, the beneficial effects of endothelin receptor antagonists are well-known in PAH treatment [1]. In contrast, in recent years, it has been shown that COOH-terminal proendothelin 1 (CT-proET-1), a more stable form of ET-1, can provide superior prognostic information regarding ET-1 and death prediction at 12 months [86].
According to studies published in previous years, the angiopoietin system (ANG), consisting of angiopoietin 1 (ANG1) and angiopoietin 2 (ANG2) antagonists, could be involved in both disease staging and treatment response in patients with IPAH [87]. Kumpers et al. showed that ANG2 was statistically significantly correlated with CI, PVR, and mvSatO2, confirming its involvement in the pathogenesis of IPAH [88]. However, additional information has emerged more recently, suggesting that ANG2 is not associated with treatment response in patients with IPAH [89], although it may be used as a diagnostic and prognostic marker in Group 3 patients with PH.
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small non-protein-coding genes that function in RNA’s post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression. A new opportunity to sensitively detect changes in gene expression is available through RNA sequencing analysis (RNA-Seq) [90]. MicroRNA expression is associated with the progression of different vascular pathologies [40,91]. RNA-Seq was used in PAH patients to evidence changes in the transcriptomes of endothelial cells cultured from lung tissue and blood. Sarrion et al. noted that miR23a expression was correlated with pulmonary function parameters, including patient age, 6MWT, CI, and PVR. Overexpression of miR27a in patients with HPAH was correlated with 6MWT and was also associated with bone morphogenetic protein type 2 receptor (BMPR2) involvement in cell proliferation. The miR199a was correlated with 6MWT and mean PAP, while miR744 was correlated with PVR [91], and miR204 levels were lower in IPAH patients, supporting its importance in the pathogenesis of IPAH [92]. Another important miRNA associated with HPAH and IPAH was miR145, with a role in the pathophysiology of PAH [93]. The miR328 induces apoptosis in smooth muscle cells, inhibits IGFR1, and acts as a protective agent in PAH [94]. A novel relationship between BMPR2 dysfunction and reduced expression of collagen IV and ephrinA1 underlies the vulnerability to injury in PAH [90]. A recent study published by Rodor et al. in Cardiovascular Research identified a promising new candidate to target endothelial dysfunction in PAH—specifically, CD74, which is involved in the regulation of endothelial cell (EC) proliferation in vitro and may contribute to the progression of PAH, being considered a new candidate for future therapeutic development [95].

5. Hypoxia/Organ and Tissue Damage

Due to decreased cardiac output and peripheral hypoperfusion, biomarkers involved in the pathogenesis of PAH have been described with both diagnostic and prognostic roles.
PaCO2: Low partial pressure of blood carbon dioxide (PaCO2) in the arterial blood of patients with PAH is usually constantly low [96,97]. According to Hoeper et al., there is a prognostic correlation between the decrease in PaCO2 and the risk of morbidity and mortality, a correlation that is not reported for PO2, as this has no prognostic significance. The improvement of PaCO2 after three months of PAH-specific treatment was associated with increased survival rates [96]. PaCO2 can be considered to be an independent non-invasive prognostic marker, which is why PaCO2 measurement during follow-up in patients with PAH has independent prognostic value and can also be used to assess the risk of major cardiovascular events [97].
Uric acid (UA) is the final product of purine metabolism and may be increased under conditions of impaired oxidative metabolism and hemodynamic changes. Increased UA levels are dependent on age and sex but are found in various pathologies, such as cardiac overproduction, renal failure, use of diuretics, or left- or right-sided HF [98]. Various studies have shown that PAH patients with increased levels of UA are correlated positively with PVR and show increased mortality rates [99]. In a recent study, Wang et al. showed a significantly reduced survival rate in CTD–PAH with elevated blood UA values [100]. Interestingly, treatment with prostanoids showed much lower UA levels in pediatric patients [101]. The only limitation is that this marker is not specific for PAH, but correlated with other markers, which may have important prognostic significance.
Copeptin is a vasopressin precursor, a key regulator of body fluid homeostasis. Copeptin serves as a surrogate for plasma vasopressin levels [102] and may provide additional NT-proBNP information in the diagnosis and prognosis of patients with chronic HF [9,103]. In PAH, copeptin had a statistically significant correlation with NYHA class, 6MWT, and renal function, and its plasma levels were significantly lower after initiating PAH-specific therapy; it was also associated with shorter survival (p  <  0.001) in a study published in 2013 [102]. The best copeptin cutoff level was ≥24.2 ng/mL with a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 80% in 25 children with PAH–CHD [104]. This value was correlated with PVR, with high plasma levels being present in severe RV failure. In this case, copeptin is a clear prognostic marker. Therefore, it can be said that copeptin highlights neurohormonal imbalance due to the alteration of the RV function [4]. Consequently, high plasma levels of copeptin may provide significant independent prognostic information and could be used for risk stratification in PAH and other cardiovascular pathologies, where further extensive interventions are needed.
Any increase in central venous pressure is associated with aggravation of renal function and onset of prerenal kidney failure, an important prognostic marker. Significant kidney failure manifested by increased plasma creatinine values is common in PAH. An acute decline in renal function is a significant marker for in-hospital death and short-term mortality in PAH [105]. In addition to renal function, liver function is also very important in PAH. Plasma bilirubin levels higher than 1.2 mg/dL are associated with high mortality, hypoperfusion, and liver failure, with a possible prognostic role in PAH [106].

6. Metabolic Biomarkers

Ghrelin, an acylated 28-amino-acid peptide hormone, is the endogen ligand for the growth hormone secretagogue receptor [107]; it is produced by the gastrointestinal tract, especially by the stomach, and plays a role in regulating appetite [108]; it is also involved in various metabolic processes, in regulating body weight, and apparently has beneficial implications in cardiovascular diseases. In HF in rats, the administration of ghrelin was positively correlated with NYHA functional class [109]. Moreover, an experimental model showed that peripheral ghrelin administration may attenuate cardiac remodeling after MI [110]. Regarding PH, ghrelin-treated animals with hypoxia-induced pulmonary arterial hypertension showed significant improvements in PVR and RV hypertrophy [111]. Yang et al. highlighted that increased serum ghrelin levels were positively correlated with RV diameter, PVR, NT-proBNP, and NO concentration in IPH patients [112]. Since ghrelin is an endogenous hormone, it may represent a promising new treatment for PAH, as well as for other cardiovascular diseases.
Fischer’s ratio (branched-chain amino acids/aromatic amino acids) and circulating amino acid profile (aminogram): Over time, clinical studies have shown that the plasma concentrations of amino acids are significantly increased in patients with PAH, and the Fischer index was negatively correlated with NYHA, NT-proBNP, PVR, and 6MWT in a group of 160 patients with PH [113]. Thus, the plasma aminogram pattern and Fischer’s ratio are not elucidated in patients with PAH. Both could be considered to be prognostic markers of disease severity, but one major limitation is that large-scale investigations are still needed [40].
The impact of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) concentration on cardiovascular pathology has been long studied from both experimental and observational perspectives. The inverse relationship between HDL-c and cardiovascular disease was described as early as 1964 in the Framingham Heart Study [114], and then, it was supported by animal studies and prospective studies with different populations [115,116]. Despite the fact that low plasma levels of HDL-c were associated with an increased risk of major cardiovascular events, elevated HDL-c has not demonstrated clear protection against atherosclerosis [116]. Regarding PAH, recent studies have highlighted that HDL-c exerts protective effects on the pulmonary vascular endothelium through several possible mechanisms, including vasodilatory activity, stimulation of NO production, anti-inflammatory properties, antioxidative properties, cytoprotection, modulation of glucose metabolism, regulation of glucose metabolism, and gene expression [116]. Heresi et al. showed that higher HDL-c levels in PAH patients were associated with slower disease progression [117], a finding also supported by Larsen et al., who concluded that higher HDL levels were associated with significantly lower mortality [118]. In addition, low plasma HDL-c levels are associated with higher mortality and clinical worsening in PAH patients [117]. Zhao et al. highlighted significantly lower values of HDL-c in patients with IPAH compared to a control group, directly proportional to the severity of the disease, i.e., short 6MWT, lower CI, and higher PVR [119]. Therefore, HDL-c can be considered to be an indicator of disease severity and an independent prognostic marker of long-term survival [118,119]. The plethora of data published thus far indicate the protective properties and survival benefits of HDL-c in PAH. Nevertheless, the clear mechanisms by which the lipid fractions exert their effects on pulmonary circulation are still under investigation. Studies on limited numbers of patients have shown low values of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) and total cholesterol in IPAH and CHD-PAH, but without association with disease severity and heart failure [120].
Elevation in the triglycerides-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (TG/HDL-c) ratio can be used as a marker of adiposity and an independent prognostic marker in patients with cardiovascular pathology; it has been shown to be correlated with abdominal obesity and higher body weight in healthy adults [121], but also with insulin resistance in some populations [122]. Studies have shown that there is an important correlation between TG/HDL-C ratio, in-hospital mortality, and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) [123,124]. Patients with PAH usually have a low body mass index (BMI), but recent studies have highlighted elevated levels of circulating lipoproteins in such cases [125]. Increased TG/HDL-c ratios and low values of LDL-c are independent of BMI [126,127]. The mechanism that determines the increase in the TG/HDL-c ratio in PAH has not been fully elucidated. There are multiple inflammatory cytokines (e.g., IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α) involved in increasing TG plasma levels and decreasing HDL-c concentrations [125]. A TG/HDL-c ratio > 3 can be considered to be a marker of systemic inflammation in IPAH [125] and a promising marker of severity progression in PAH [128]. Data are still limited regarding the role of lipid ratios in PAH. Future studies are required in order to evaluate the benefits of statin therapy in this patient category.

7. Oxidative Stress Biomarkers

F2-isoprostane: Over time, more and more PAH biomarkers have been highlighted in blood, but very few studies have evaluated their presence in urine. One of these, led by Cracowski et al., studied a urinary component, F2-isoprostane, a biomarker of lipid peroxidation, in 110 adults with PAH [129]. They found that F2-soprostane was an independent prognostic marker in PAH, as the only urinary component that was associated with an increased risk of death. They also suggested that the measurement of this urinary component in the urine of asymptomatic children with a family history of IPAH could be used for the early detection of disease progression [129]. However, the information obtained is supported by few clinical data; therefore, further clinical studies are still needed.
Other oxidative-stress-related biomarkers: Vasoconstriction induced by oxidative stress and decreased bioavailability are among the most important factors involved in PAH, increasing lipid peroxidation and reducing antioxidant defenses. In 2013, Reis et al. [130] published a study in which oxidative stress was evaluated based on plasma activity of reduced glutathione (GSH) and lipid peroxidation was expressed by malondialdehyde (MDA). Thus, a reduction in GSH and vitamin E levels was highlighted, along with lipid peroxidation and a decrease in antioxidant defenses [130]. Therefore, it can be extrapolated that inflammation and oxidative stress may be considered to be important elements in PAH, but further investigations of oxidative stress markers in patients with pulmonary hypertension are required.

8. In Situ Thrombosis

In situ thrombosis and platelet aggregation have always been considered to be essential elements in the onset of plexiform lesions in PAH. Von Willebrand factor (vWF) is a large glycoprotein synthesized in the endothelium that plays an essential role in platelet aggregation and adhesion at sites of vascular injury; its elevated plasma levels have been used as markers of endothelial cell injury in an increasing number of pathologies [12]. Elevated plasma levels of vWF and its antigen (vWF:Ag) are associated with short-term prognosis in patients with pulmonary hypertension [131]. Another study highlighted that increased vWF levels were associated with a lower survival rate in patients with PAH [132]. In addition, increased levels of procoagulant microparticles have also been noted in PAH, associated with endothelial failure and thrombosis activation [133]. Therefore, circulating markers of endothelial damage, pro-inflammatory markers, and circulating microparticles could be essential tools in determining the severity of PAH [134]. D-dimer, measured by using the ELISA method, is a marker of cross-linked fibrin that indicates microvascular thrombosis. In patients with IPAH, increased D-dimer values were correlated with disease severity (i.e., NYHA, PVR, and mvSatO2) compared to the control group [135]. Nevertheless, these results need to be validated through extensive clinical trials.
The use of more biomarkers could improve risk assessment. A clinical study published in 2017 showed that a panel of nine different proteins, including several physiopathological mechanisms related to PAH, could be much more useful for patient staging, treatment response assessment, and prognosis compared to the existing clinical tools [136]. These are represented by ST2/IL1R1, the metalloproteinases TIMP1 and TIMP2, plasminogen, ApoE, erythropoietin (EPO), complement factors H and D, and insulin-like growth-factor-binding protein 1 (IGFBP1). However, further investigations and extensive population studies are required for this panel to be included in the current guidelines.
Moreover, we present the applicability of these biomarkers in clinical practice, along with their limitations, as shown in Table 2, together with potential biomarkers requiring further studies.
Because of space limitations, not all studies could be cited. Abbreviations: ADM, adrenomedullin; ADMA, asymmetric dimethylarginine; ANG, angiopoietin; BNP, brain natriuretic peptide; CRP, C-reactive protein; CysC, cystatin C; ET-1, endothelin 1; GDF-15, growth differentiation factor 15; HDL-c, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; IL, interleukin; MIF, macrophage migration inhibitory factor; NLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; NT-proBNP, N-terminal fragment of pro-brain natriuretic peptide; OPN, osteopontin; PaCO2, partial pressure of blood carbon dioxide; PIGF, placental growth factor; PLC, platelet count; RDW, red blood cell distribution width; sFlt1, soluble FMS-like tyrosine kinase 1; TG/HDL-c, triglyceride–high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio; TnI, troponin I; TnT, troponin T; UA, uric acid; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; vWF, von Willebrand factor.

9. Age and Sex Differences

Although PAH can appear at any age, it is most prevalent in young adults. Sex differences are observed in clinical practice in most PAH cases [138]. The European COMPERA registry shows a higher prevalence in women compared to men, at a ratio of 2.3:1 for the age group up to 65 years old, compared to 1.2:1 in the case of patients over 65 years old [139]. The equalization of this female-to-male ratio is influenced by the hormonal changes that occur during menopause [140]. The US National Institutes of Health (NIH) Registry [140] shows a 1.7:1 female-to-male ratio in the prevalence of PAH, while the REVEAL registry demonstrates a 4.1:1 ratio [141,142]. Moreover, hemodynamic profile differences between the sexes were reported in the REVEAL registry, including higher PAP/PVR and lower cardiac index in males compared to females [142]. The impact of sex hormones on pulmonary vasculature is complex and is still under investigation. Estrogens and androgens are pulmonary vasoactive components with variable effects on apoptosis and cell proliferation. It appears that sex hormones, especially estrogen, are the essential elements in understanding these mechanisms [138]. The literature describes an “estrogen paradox”. This condition has an increased prevalence in the case of women, and estrogen has been associated with a higher risk of PAH development. However, paradoxically, once affected, women have a better prognosis, improved long-term survival, and increased favorable responses to treatment compared to men [1,138,142]. The results obtained on experimental models have been contradictory over time; nevertheless, the majority have demonstrated a protective effect of estrogen on pulmonary vascularization. Females have less vascular remodeling and hemodynamic compromise than males and, in addition, older females develop fewer severe pulmonary vascular changes [143]. Moreover, testosterone is associated with maladaptive RV hypertrophy, greater RV volumes, and fibrosis in murines [144]. Dysregulation of estrogen synthesis and metabolism plays a major role in these sex-related differences [145]. Based on these data, there are some ongoing clinical trials to evaluate the effects of anti-estrogenic therapy in PAH (e.g., NCT03229499, NCT03528902), whose results are highly anticipated [138]. Indeed, further studies should be encouraged for a better understanding of the influence of sex on this disease, in order to establish new targeted treatments.

10. Immune System Cells

Cellular biomarkers can provide essential information about vascular endothelial function. These markers include circulating microvesicles and progenitor cells (PCs) [146]. These endothelial microvesicles (EMVs) are <0.1 μm in size. They are released by the endothelium in response to damage or apoptosis [146]. Circulating EMVs can be identified and quantified in peripheral blood vessels through flow cytometry [147]. Healthy individuals show only small amounts of EMVs; however, in PAH, increased levels of EMVs may be correlated with disease severity [146], especially in IPAH. It is therefore suggested that EMVs might play a role in the pathogenesis of PAH [146]. Progenitor cells are small immature cells produced in the bone marrow and released into circulation to replace damaged endothelial cells [148]. A reduced number of PCs in plasma circulation suggests decreased repair capacity of the vascular endothelium [148]. The EMVs/PCs ratio can be considered to be a marker of vascular competence, with significantly increased values in PAH [146].
In all types of PAH, numerous immune-cell infiltrations are evident at the pulmonary level, which contributes to pulmonary vascular remodeling. Among these cell infiltrations, we can identify cytotoxic and helper T cells, B cells, monocytes, macrophages, neutrophils, natural killer (NK) cells, dendritic cells (DCs), and mast cells [149].
Macrophages are key cells involved in the inflammatory response, with an essential role in the pathogenesis of PAH and arteriole muscularization through inflammation, as well as in endothelial dysfunction through the secretion of VRGF. There are two types of macrophages: classically activated M1 pro-inflammatory macrophages, and alternatively activated M2 anti-inflammatory macrophages. Inflammation stimulates local macrophage proliferation and recruitment of monocytes which, in turn, differentiate into macrophages [150]. Vergadi et al. showed an early accumulation of macrophages, especially those of the activated M2 phenotype, in the lungs of mice in a murine model of hypoxia-induced PAH [151]. Fan et al. reported that M1 macrophages cause apoptosis in endothelial cells, while M2 macrophages stimulate the proliferation of smooth muscle cells in a rat model of monocrotaline–induced PAH [152]. Therefore, inhibition of the function, production, and recruitment of macrophages can improve PAH, according to data from the literature [149,151].
Mast cells contribute to angiogenesis by producing mast cell proteases, which cause perivascular cellular lesions in PAH patients. The increased levels of mast cell proteases such as chymase and tryptase in lung tissue are directly proportional to vascular pathological remodeling and PAH severity [149,153].
Natural killer (NK) cells are able to identify and eliminate infectious cells via the degranulation of perforin-containing granules and granzymes [150]. Recent studies have confirmed the role of NK cells and CD8+ cytotoxic T cells in vascular remodeling as essential components in the vascular plexus lesions of IPAH and HPAP patients. Impairment of NK cells in PAH suggests a substantive role for innate immunity in the pathobiology of the disease [154]. In addition, experimental studies have shown that rats deficient in T cells more frequently present PAH with a worse prognosis [155]
Regulatory T lymphocytes are divided into natural Treg lymphocytes (nTregs), which express CD25+/CD4+, and induced Tregs (iTregs). Treg cells are essential in maintaining immune system homeostasis and inhibiting the immune reactions of autoreactive T cells [150]. Regarding PAH, the mechanisms involved are continuously being researched. Some reports describe the protective role of regulatory T cells against endothelial dysfunction [156]. Treg cell deficiency has been noted in IPAH, especially in women, signaling their association with the pathogenesis and development of PAH [149,156].
B lymphocytes produce antibodies, explaining the presence of antinuclear autoantibodies for pulmonary cells and fibroblasts in PAH. These endothelial autoantibodies stimulate apoptosis at the vascular endothelium level and contribute to vascular remodeling, with direct involvement in the pathogenesis of PAH [157]. The role of autoimmune damage comes from increased levels of IgA autoantibodies and plasmablasts [157]. The research carried out by Huertes et al. was among the first to highlight local autoimmunity and lymphoid tissue accumulation around remodeled vessels in PAH [158]. B-cell activation and immune complex deposition, in which decreased activity of T cells is a factor, lead to pathological vascular remodeling [149]. Moreover, Breitling et al. presented the mast cell-B lymphocyte axis as being involved in the occurrence of PAH through its effects on pathological vascular remodeling [159]. Another study demonstrated that the activation of B lymphocytes is associated with pulmonary fibrosis in systemic sclerosis patients [160]. For this reason, a phase II clinical trial with anti-CD20 antibodies is ongoing
The role of dendritic cells (DCs) in PAH has not been fully elucidated. DCs are involved in the activation of naive T cells and are also related to endothelial cells, antibodies, and fibroblasts. Clinical data suggest that DCs can accumulate in the adventitial pulmonary arteries of IPAH patients. In addition, complex lesions of human pulmonary arteries have shown transmural DC infiltration. Phenotyping revealed an immature DC profile in human and experimental pulmonary hypertension [161].
Inflammatory cell analysis has been a constant challenge over time. However, due to the complexity of immune cell populations, flow cytometry has proven to be a sophisticated approach to identify and quantify several inflammatory and immune cells. This technique can characterize cells from human blood, lavage samples, urine samples, and tissue samples (e.g., the lungs and pulmonary arteries for PAH) [162,163]. For the first time, Marsh et al. described the presence and regulation of two cell types in IPAH lungs: γδT cells and pDCs. With the help of high-throughput flow cytometry, they revealed the relationships between multiple inflammatory cells, autoimmune inflammation, and IPAH [163]. Rose et al. used flow cytometric methods to quantify decreased β-adrenergic receptor density in circulating white blood cells (WBCs) in PAH patients. Moreover, endothelial-cell-derived microparticles in urine samples were directly correlated with right ventricular function in PAH [164].
The latest literature data suggest the use of mass cytometry immunophenotyping (CyTOF) instead to flow cytometry for immunological studies. Flow cytometry is limited by some parameters that can restrict its utility. The advent of mass cytometry (CyTOF) has enabled high-dimensional and unbiased examination of the immune system, allowing for the simultaneous investigation of a large number of parameters. This is important for the deep and clear investigation of immune responses when sample sizes are limited [165]. The applicability of CyTOF has been validated in neoplastic pathology, but it has also demonstrated significant utility in other pathologies. Therefore, in 2020, the first report on CyTOF of blood mononuclear cells in PAH was presented, highlighting significant alterations of the innate and adaptive immune surveillance in IPAH and HPAP [166].
Consequently, microparticles can provide biological information about cell injury and apoptosis, but their clinical use is technically challenging. The availability of flow cytometry and of mass cytometry immunophenotyping (CyTOF) can help in quantifying microparticles from blood, urine, and tissues, and offers the possibility of more easily assessing immune biomarkers of vascular remodeling in PAH [164]. The roles of the immune system and autoimmunity in PAH have been extensively studied in recent years, but further research is still required for a deeper perception of the pathogenesis of the disease, in order to develop new targeted therapeutics and prevention strategies.

11. Conclusions

This article details some potential biomarkers previously assessed through clinical trials in PAH. So far, however, none of them have exhibited such high sensitivity and specificity that they could be used alone in establishing the diagnosis or in assessing the prognosis of patients with precapillary PAH. Given the complexity of the disease, it is unlikely that one marker alone will suffice. The great limitation of this review is that most of these markers were assessed through small clinical trials on a small number of patients. Therefore, most of the information should be treated with caution. Larger studies with higher numbers of patients are required for these biomarkers to be validated for use in clinical guidelines.

Funding

This research was financially supported under the contract funded by “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Dept. of Physiology, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, through the internal grant with the number 1529/31/18.01.2019.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Humbert, M.; Kovacs, G.; Hoeper, M.M.; Badagliacca, R.; Berger, R.M.F.; Brida, M.; Carlsen, J.; Coats, A.J.S.; Escribano-Subias, P.; Ferrari, P.; et al. 2022 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension. Eur. Heart J. 2022, 43, 3618–3731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Pietra, G.G.; Capron, F.; Stewart, S.; Leone, O.; Humbert, M.; Robbins, I.M.; Reid, L.M.; Tuder, R.M. Pathologic Assessment of Vasculopathies in Pulmonary Hypertension. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2004, 43, S25–S32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Kylhammar, D.; Hesselstrand, R.; Nielsen, S.; Scheele, C.; Rådegran, G. Angiogenic and Inflammatory Biomarkers for Screening and Follow-up in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Scand. J. Rheumatol. 2018, 47, 319–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Banaszkiewicz, M.; Gąsecka, A.; Darocha, S.; Florczyk, M.; Pietrasik, A.; Kędzierski, P.; Piłka, M.; Torbicki, A.; Kurzyna, M. Circulating Blood-Based Biomarkers in Pulmonary Hypertension. JCM 2022, 11, 383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Yap, L.B.; Mukerjee, D.; Timms, P.M.; Ashrafian, H.; Coghlan, J.G. Natriuretic Peptides, Respiratory Disease, and the Right Heart. Chest 2004, 126, 1330–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Foris, V.; Kovacs, G.; Tscherner, M.; Olschewski, A.; Olschewski, H. Biomarkers in Pulmonary Hypertension. Chest 2013, 144, 274–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. de Lemos, J.A.; McGuire, D.K.; Drazner, M.H. B-Type Natriuretic Peptide in Cardiovascular Disease. Lancet 2003, 362, 316–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Leuchte, H.H.; El Nounou, M.; Tuerpe, J.C.; Hartmann, B.; Baumgartner, R.A.; Vogeser, M.; Muehling, O.; Behr, J. N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide and Renal Insufficiency as Predictors of Mortality in Pulmonary Hypertension. Chest 2007, 131, 402–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. McDonagh, T.A.; Metra, M.; Adamo, M.; Gardner, R.S.; Baumbach, A.; Böhm, M.; Burri, H.; Butler, J.; Čelutkienė, J.; Chioncel, O.; et al. Corrigendum to: 2021 ESC Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure: Developed by the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) With the Special Contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur. Heart J. 2021, 42, 4901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wiedemann, R.; Ghofrani, H.A.; Weissmann, N.; Schermuly, R.; Quanz, K.; Grimminger, F.; Seeger, W.; Olschewski, H. Atrial Natriuretic Peptide in Severe Primary and Nonprimary Pulmonary Hypertension. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2001, 38, 1130–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nagaya, N.; Nishikimi, T.; Uematsu, M.; Satoh, T.; Kyotani, S.; Sakamaki, F.; Kakishita, M.; Fukushima, K.; Okano, Y.; Nakanishi, N.; et al. Plasma Brain Natriuretic Peptide as a Prognostic Indicator in Patients With Primary Pulmonary Hypertension. Circulation 2000, 102, 865–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Warwick, G.; Thomas, P.S.; Yates, D.H. Biomarkers in Pulmonary Hypertension. Eur. Respir. J. 2008, 32, 503–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Andreassen, A.K.; Wergeland, R.; Simonsen, S.; Geiran, O.; Guevara, C.; Ueland, T. N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide as an Indicator of Disease Severity in a Heterogeneous Group of Patients With Chronic Precapillary Pulmonary Hypertension. Am. J. Cardiol. 2006, 98, 525–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Chin, K.M.; Rubin, L.J.; Channick, R.; Di Scala, L.; Gaine, S.; Galiè, N.; Ghofrani, H.-A.; Hoeper, M.M.; Lang, I.M.; McLaughlin, V.V.; et al. Association of N-Terminal Pro Brain Natriuretic Peptide and Long-Term Outcome in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Insights From the Phase III GRIPHON Study. Circulation 2019, 139, 2440–2450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Hoeper, M.M.; Pausch, C.; Olsson, K.M.; Huscher, D.; Pittrow, D.; Grünig, E.; Staehler, G.; Vizza, C.D.; Gall, H.; Distler, O.; et al. COMPERA 2.0: A Refined Four-Stratum Risk Assessment Model for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Eur. Respir. J. 2022, 60, 2102311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Coghlan, J.G.; Denton, C.P.; Grünig, E.; Bonderman, D.; Distler, O.; Khanna, D.; Müller-Ladner, U.; Pope, J.E.; Vonk, M.C.; Doelberg, M.; et al. Evidence-Based Detection of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in Systemic Sclerosis: The DETECT Study. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2014, 73, 1340–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Torbicki, A.; Kurzyna, M.; Kuca, P.; Fijałkowska, A.; Sikora, J.; Florczyk, M.; Pruszczyk, P.; Burakowski, J.; Wawrzyńska, L. Detectable Serum Cardiac Troponin T as a Marker of Poor Prognosis Among Patients With Chronic Precapillary Pulmonary Hypertension. Circulation 2003, 108, 844–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Collet, J.-P.; Thiele, H.; Barbato, E.; Barthélémy, O.; Bauersachs, J.; Bhatt, D.L.; Dendale, P.; Dorobantu, M.; Edvardsen, T.; Folliguet, T.; et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation. Eur. Heart J. 2021, 42, 1289–1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. de Lemos, J.A.; Drazner, M.H.; Omland, T.; Ayers, C.R.; Khera, A.; Rohatgi, A.; Hashim, I.; Berry, J.D.; Das, S.R.; Morrow, D.A.; et al. Association of Troponin T Detected With a Highly Sensitive Assay and Cardiac Structure and Mortality Risk in the General Population. JAMA 2010, 304, 2503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Vélez-Martínez, M.; Ayers, C.; Mishkin, J.D.; Bartolome, S.B.; García, C.K.; Torres, F.; Drazner, M.H.; de Lemos, J.A.; Turer, A.T.; Chin, K.M. Association of Cardiac Troponin I With Disease Severity and Outcomes in Patients With Pulmonary Hypertension. Am. J. Cardiol. 2013, 111, 1812–1817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Heresi, G.A.; Tang, W.H.W.; Aytekin, M.; Hammel, J.; Hazen, S.L.; Dweik, R.A. Sensitive Cardiac Troponin I Predicts Poor Outcomes in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Eur. Respir. J. 2012, 39, 939–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Filusch, A.; Giannitsis, E.; Katus, H.A.; Meyer, F.J. High-Sensitive Troponin T: A Novel Biomarker for Prognosis and Disease Severity in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Clin. Sci. 2010, 119, 207–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Weinberg, E.O.; Shimpo, M.; De Keulenaer, G.W.; MacGillivray, C.; Tominaga, S.; Solomon, S.D.; Rouleau, J.-L.; Lee, R.T. Expression and Regulation of ST2, an Interleukin-1 Receptor Family Member, in Cardiomyocytes and Myocardial Infarction. Circulation 2002, 106, 2961–2966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Ky, B.; French, B.; McCloskey, K.; Rame, J.E.; McIntosh, E.; Shahi, P.; Dries, D.L.; Tang, W.H.W.; Wu, A.H.B.; Fang, J.C.; et al. High-Sensitivity ST2 for Prediction of Adverse Outcomes in Chronic Heart Failure. Circ: Heart Fail. 2011, 4, 180–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Pascual-Figal, D.A.; Manzano-Fernández, S.; Boronat, M.; Casas, T.; Garrido, I.P.; Bonaque, J.C.; Pastor-Perez, F.; Valdés, M.; Januzzi, J.L. Soluble ST2, High-Sensitivity Troponin T- and N-Terminal pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide: Complementary Role for Risk Stratification in Acutely Decompensated Heart Failure. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2011, 13, 718–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Felker, G.M.; Fiuzat, M.; Thompson, V.; Shaw, L.K.; Neely, M.L.; Adams, K.F.; Whellan, D.J.; Donahue, M.P.; Ahmad, T.; Kitzman, D.W.; et al. Soluble ST2 in Ambulatory Patients With Heart Failure: Association With Functional Capacity and Long-Term Outcomes. Circ: Heart Fail. 2013, 6, 1172–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Lassus, J.; Gayat, E.; Mueller, C.; Peacock, W.F.; Spinar, J.; Harjola, V.-P.; van Kimmenade, R.; Pathak, A.; Mueller, T.; diSomma, S.; et al. Incremental Value of Biomarkers to Clinical Variables for Mortality Prediction in Acutely Decompensated Heart Failure: The Multinational Observational Cohort on Acute Heart Failure (MOCA) Study. Int. J. Cardiol. 2013, 168, 2186–2194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Carlomagno, G.; Messalli, G.; Melillo, R.M.; Stanziola, A.A.; Visciano, C.; Mercurio, V.; Imbriaco, M.; Ghio, S.; Sofia, M.; Bonaduce, D.; et al. Serum Soluble ST2 and Interleukin-33 Levels in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Int. J. Cardiol. 2013, 168, 1545–1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Geenen, L.W.; Baggen, V.J.M.; Kauling, R.M.; Koudstaal, T.; Boomars, K.A.; Boersma, E.; Roos-Hesselink, J.W.; van den Bosch, A.E. The Prognostic Value of Soluble ST2 in Adults with Pulmonary Hypertension. JCM 2019, 8, 1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Zheng, Y.-G.; Yang, T.; He, J.-G.; Chen, G.; Liu, Z.-H.; Xiong, C.-M.; Gu, Q.; Ni, X.-H.; Zhao, Z.-H. Plasma Soluble ST2 Levels Correlate With Disease Severity and Predict Clinical Worsening in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Soluble ST2 Levels in PAH. Clin. Cardiol. 2014, 37, 365–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Banaszkiewicz, M.; Pietrasik, A.; Florczyk, M.; Kędzierski, P.; Piłka, M.; Mańczak, R.; Kochman, J.; Opolski, G.; Torbicki, A.; Kurzyna, M.; et al. Soluble ST2 as a Biomarker for Early Complications in Patients with Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension Treated with Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Kriechbaum, S.D.; Wiedenroth, C.B.; Peters, K.; Barde, M.A.; Ajnwojner, R.; Wolter, J.-S.; Haas, M.; Roller, F.C.; Guth, S.; Rieth, A.J.; et al. Galectin-3, GDF-15, and SST2 for the Assessment of Disease Severity and Therapy Response in Patients Suffering from Inoperable Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension. Biomarkers 2020, 25, 578–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Angelidis, C.; Deftereos, S.; Giannopoulos, G.; Anatoliotakis, N.; Bouras, G.; Hatzis, G.; Panagopoulou, V.; Pyrgakis, V.; Cleman, M.W. Cystatin C: An Emerging Biomarker in Cardiovascular Disease. CTMC 2013, 13, 164–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Coll, E.; Botey, A.; Alvarez, L.; Poch, E.; Quintó, L.; Saurina, A.; Vera, M.; Piera, C.; Darnell, A. Serum Cystatin C as a New Marker for Noninvasive Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate and as a Marker for Early Renal Impairment. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2000, 36, 29–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Tang, W.H.W.; Van Lente, F.; Shrestha, K.; Troughton, R.W.; Francis, G.S.; Tong, W.; Martin, M.G.; Borowski, A.G.; Jasper, S.; Starling, R.C.; et al. Impact of Myocardial Function on Cystatin C Measurements in Chronic Systolic Heart Failure. J. Card. Fail. 2008, 14, 394–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Fenster, B.E.; Lasalvia, L.; Schroeder, J.D.; Smyser, J.; Silveira, L.J.; Buckner, J.K.; Brown, K.K. Cystatin C: A Potential Biomarker for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Cystatin C for Pulmonary Hypertension. Respirology 2014, 19, 583–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Blok, I.M.; van Riel, A.C.M.J.; Schuuring, M.J.; de Bruin-Bon, R.H.A.C.M.; van Dijk, A.P.J.; Hoendermis, E.S.; Zwinderman, A.H.; Mulder, B.J.M.; Bouma, B.J. The Role of Cystatin C as a Biomarker for Prognosis in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Due to Congenital Heart Disease. Int. J. Cardiol. 2016, 209, 242–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Sanli, C.; Oguz, D.; Olgunturk, R.; Tunaoglu, F.S.; Kula, S.; Pasaoglu, H.; Gulbahar, O.; Cevik, A. Elevated Homocysteine and Asymmetric Dimethyl Arginine Levels in Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Congenital Heart Disease. Pediatr. Cardiol. 2012, 33, 1323–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Arroliga, A.C.; Sandur, S.; Jacobsen, D.W.; Tewari, S.; Mustafa, M.; Mascha, E.J.; Robinson, K. Association between Hyperhomocysteinemia and Primary Pulmonary Hypertension. Respir. Med. 2003, 97, 825–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Anwar, A.; Ruffenach, G.; Mahajan, A.; Eghbali, M.; Umar, S. Novel Biomarkers for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Respir. Res. 2016, 17, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Quarck, R.; Nawrot, T.; Meyns, B.; Delcroix, M. C-Reactive Protein. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009, 53, 1211–1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Scognamiglio, G.; Kempny, A.; Price, L.C.; Alonso-Gonzalez, R.; Marino, P.; Swan, L.; D’ Alto, M.; Hooper, J.; Gatzoulis, M.A.; Dimopoulos, K.; et al. C-Reactive Protein in Adults with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Associated with Congenital Heart Disease and Its Prognostic Value. Heart 2014, 100, 1335–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Lippi, G.; Targher, G.; Montagnana, M.; Salvagno, G.L.; Zoppini, G.; Guidi, G.C. Relation Between Red Blood Cell Distribution Width and Inflammatory Biomarkers in a Large Cohort of Unselected Outpatients. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2009, 133, 628–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Osadnik, T.; Strzelczyk, J.; Hawranek, M.; Lekston, A.; Wasilewski, J.; Kurek, A.; Gutowski, A.R.; Wilczek, K.; Dyrbuś, K.; Gierlotka, M.; et al. Red Cell Distribution Width Is Associated with Long-Term Prognosis in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord. 2013, 13, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Zorlu, A.; Bektasoglu, G.; Kukul Guven, F.M.; Dogan, O.T.; Gucuk, E.; Refiker Ege, M.; Altay, H.; Cınar, Z.; Tandogan, I.; Yilmaz, M.B. Usefulness of Admission Red Cell Distribution Width as a Predictor of Early Mortality in Patients With Acute Pulmonary Embolism. Am. J. Cardiol. 2012, 109, 128–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Felker, G.M.; Allen, L.A.; Pocock, S.J.; Shaw, L.K.; McMurray, J.J.V.; Pfeffer, M.A.; Swedberg, K.; Wang, D.; Yusuf, S.; Michelson, E.L.; et al. Red Cell Distribution Width as a Novel Prognostic Marker in Heart Failure. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2007, 50, 40–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Rhodes, C.J.; Wharton, J.; Howard, L.S.; Gibbs, J.S.R.; Wilkins, M.R. Red Cell Distribution Width Outperforms Other Potential Circulating Biomarkers in Predicting Survival in Idiopathic Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Heart 2011, 97, 1054–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Smukowska-Gorynia, A.; Tomaszewska, I.; Malaczynska-Rajpold, K.; Marcinkowska, J.; Komosa, A.; Janus, M.; Olasinska-Wisniewska, A.; Slawek, S.; Araszkiewicz, A.; Jankiewicz, S.; et al. Red Blood Cells Distribution Width as a Potential Prognostic Biomarker in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension and Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension. Heart Lung Circ. 2018, 27, 842–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wollert, K.C.; Kempf, T.; Wallentin, L. Growth Differentiation Factor 15 as a Biomarker in Cardiovascular Disease. Clin. Chem. 2017, 63, 140–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Nickel, N.; Kempf, T.; Tapken, H.; Tongers, J.; Laenger, F.; Lehmann, U.; Golpon, H.; Olsson, K.; Wilkins, M.R.; Gibbs, J.S.R.; et al. Growth Differentiation Factor-15 in Idiopathic Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2008, 178, 534–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Meadows, C.A.; Risbano, M.G.; Zhang, L.; Geraci, M.W.; Tuder, R.M.; Collier, D.H.; Bull, T.M. Increased Expression of Growth Differentiation Factor-15 in Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Chest 2011, 139, 994–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Meijers, W.C.; van der Velde, A.R.; Pascual-Figal, D.A.; de Boer, R.A. Galectin-3 and Post-Myocardial Infarction Cardiac Remodeling. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2015, 763, 115–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Edelmann, F.; Holzendorf, V.; Wachter, R.; Nolte, K.; Schmidt, A.G.; Kraigher-Krainer, E.; Duvinage, A.; Unkelbach, I.; Düngen, H.; Tschöpe, C.; et al. Galectin-3 in Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: Results from the Aldo- DHF Trial. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2015, 17, 214–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Heidenreich, P.A.; Bozkurt, B.; Aguilar, D.; Allen, L.A.; Byun, J.J.; Colvin, M.M.; Deswal, A.; Drazner, M.H.; Dunlay, S.M.; Evers, L.R.; et al. 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2022, 145, e895–e1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Calvier, L.; Legchenko, E.; Grimm, L.; Sallmon, H.; Hatch, A.; Plouffe, B.D.; Schroeder, C.; Bauersachs, J.; Murthy, S.K.; Hansmann, G. Galectin-3 and Aldosterone as Potential Tandem Biomarkers in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Heart 2016, 102, 390–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Fenster, B.E.; Lasalvia, L.; Schroeder, J.D.; Smyser, J.; Silveira, L.J.; Buckner, J.K.; Brown, K.K. Galectin-3 Levels Are Associated with Right Ventricular Functional and Morphologic Changes in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Heart Vessel. 2016, 31, 939–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Soon, E.; Holmes, A.M.; Treacy, C.M.; Doughty, N.J.; Southgate, L.; Machado, R.D.; Trembath, R.C.; Jennings, S.; Barker, L.; Nicklin, P.; et al. Elevated Levels of Inflammatory Cytokines Predict Survival in Idiopathic and Familial Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Circulation 2010, 122, 920–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Selimovic, N.; Bergh, C.-H.; Andersson, B.; Sakiniene, E.; Carlsten, H.; Rundqvist, B. Growth Factors and Interleukin-6 across the Lung Circulation in Pulmonary Hypertension. Eur. Respir. J. 2009, 34, 662–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Lorenzen, J.M.; Nickel, N.; Krämer, R.; Golpon, H.; Westerkamp, V.; Olsson, K.M.; Haller, H.; Hoeper, M.M. Osteopontin in Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Hypertension. Chest 2011, 139, 1010–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Rosenberg, M.; Meyer, F.J.; Gruenig, E.; Lutz, M.; Lossnitzer, D.; Wipplinger, R.; Katus, H.A.; Frey, N. Osteopontin Predicts Adverse Right Ventricular Remodelling and Dysfunction in Pulmonary Hypertension: OPN PREDICTS RV REMODELING AND FAILURE IN PH. Eur. J. Clin. Investig. 2012, 42, 933–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Akın, A.; Alehan, D.; Aykan, H.H.; Özkutlu, S.; Özer, S.; Karagöz, T. Serum Bcl-2 Values in Children with Pulmonary Hypertension. Pediatr. Cardiol. 2015, 36, 579–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Yıldız, A.; Kaya, H.; Ertaş, F.; Oylumlu, M.; Bilik, M.Z.; Yüksel, M.; Polat, N.; Akil, M.A.; Atılgan, Z.; Ulgen, M.S. Association between Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio and Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Turk. Kardiyol. Dern. Ars. 2013, 41, 604–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Özpelit, E.; Akdeniz, B.; Özpelit, M.E.; Tas, S.; Bozkurt, S.; Tertemiz, K.C.; Sevinç, C.; Badak, Ö. Prognostic Value of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. J. Int. Med. Res. 2015, 43, 661–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Foris, V.; Kovacs, G.; Douschan, P.; Avian, A.; Olschewski, A.; Olschewski, H. Neutrophil- to-Lymphocyte Ratio as a Prognostic Parameter in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. In Proceedings of the 4.3 Pulmonary Circulation and Pulmonary Vascular Diseases; European Respiratory Society: London, UK, 3 September 2016; p. PA2479. [Google Scholar]
  65. Jutras-Beaudoin, N.; Toro, V.; Lajoie, A.C.; Breuils-Bonnet, S.; Paulin, R.; Potus, F. Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio as an Independent Predictor of Survival in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: An Exploratory Study. CJC Open 2022, 4, 357–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Le Hiress, M.; Tu, L.; Ricard, N.; Phan, C.; Thuillet, R.; Fadel, E.; Dorfmüller, P.; Montani, D.; de Man, F.; Humbert, M.; et al. Proinflammatory Signature of the Dysfunctional Endothelium in Pulmonary Hypertension. Role of the Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor/CD74 Complex. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2015, 192, 983–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Stefanantoni, K.; Sciarra, I.; Vasile, M.; Badagliacca, R.; Poscia, R.; Pendolino, M.; Alessandri, C.; Vizza, C.D.; Valesini, G.; Riccieri, V. Elevated Serum Levels of Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor and Stem Cell Growth Factor β in Patients with Idiopathic and Systemic Sclerosis Associated Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Reumatismo 2015, 66, 270–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Hoffmann, G.; Wirleitner, B.; Fuchs, D. Potential Role of Immune System Activation-Associated Production of Neopterin Derivatives in Humans. Inflamm. Res. 2003, 52, 313–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Yamamoto, E.; Hirata, Y.; Tokitsu, T.; Kusaka, H.; Tabata, N.; Tsujita, K.; Yamamuro, M.; Kaikita, K.; Watanabe, H.; Hokimoto, S.; et al. The Clinical Significance of Plasma Neopterin in Heart Failure with Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction. ESC Heart Fail. 2016, 3, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Kakishita, M.; Nishikimi, T.; Okano, Y.; Satoh, T.; Kyotani, S.; Nagaya, N.; Fukushima, K.; Nakanishi, N.; Takishita, S.; Miyata, A.; et al. Increased Plasma Levels of Adrenomedullin in Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension. Clin. Sci. 1999, 96, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Murakami, S.; Kimura, H.; Kangawa, K.; Nagaya, N. Physiological Significance and Therapeutic Potential of Adrenomedullin in Pulmonary Hypertension. CHDDT 2006, 6, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Nagaya, N. Haemodynamic and Hormonal Effects of Adrenomedullin in Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension. Heart 2000, 84, 653–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Zhang, S.; Yang, T.; Xu, X.; Wang, M.; Zhong, L.; Yang, Y.; Zhai, Z.; Xiao, F.; Wang, C. Oxidative Stress and Nitric Oxide Signaling Related Biomarkers in Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension: A Case Control Study. BMC Pulm. Med. 2015, 15, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Gąsecka, A.; Szwed, P.; Jasińska, K.; Fidali, O.; Kłębukowska, A.; Eyileten, C.; Postula, M.; Szarpak, Ł.; Mazurek, T.; Opolski, G.; et al. Symmetric Dimethylarginine Is Altered in Patients After Myocardial Infarction and Predicts Adverse Outcomes. JIR 2021, 14, 3797–3808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Kielstein, J.T.; Bode-Böger, S.M.; Hesse, G.; Martens-Lobenhoffer, J.; Takacs, A.; Fliser, D.; Hoeper, M.M. Asymmetrical Dimethylarginine in Idiopathic Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. ATVB 2005, 25, 1414–1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Voelkel, N.F.; Gomez-Arroyo, J. The Role of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. The Angiogenesis Paradox. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2014, 51, 474–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Sundaram, N.; Tailor, A.; Mendelsohn, L.; Wansapura, J.; Wang, X.; Higashimoto, T.; Pauciulo, M.W.; Gottliebson, W.; Kalra, V.K.; Nichols, W.C.; et al. High Levels of Placenta Growth Factor in Sickle Cell Disease Promote Pulmonary Hypertension. Blood 2010, 116, 109–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Malhotra, R.; Paskin-Flerlage, S.; Zamanian, R.T.; Zimmerman, P.; Schmidt, J.W.; Deng, D.Y.; Southwood, M.; Spencer, R.; Lai, C.S.; Parker, W.; et al. Circulating Angiogenic Modulatory Factors Predict Survival and Functional Class in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Pulm. Circ. 2013, 3, 369–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Tiede, S.L.; Gall, H.; Dörr, O.; Guilherme, M.; dos Santos Guilherme, M.; Troidl, C.; Liebetrau, C.; Voss, S.; Voswinckel, R.; Schermuly, R.T.; et al. New Potential Diagnostic Biomarkers for Pulmonary Hypertension. Eur. Respir. J. 2015, 46, 1390–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. McMahan, Z.; Schoenhoff, F.; Van Eyk, J.E.; Wigley, F.M.; Hummers, L.K. Biomarkers of Pulmonary Hypertension in Patients with Scleroderma: A Case–Control Study. Arthritis. Res. 2015, 17, 201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Maron, B.A.; Opotowsky, A.R.; Landzberg, M.J.; Loscalzo, J.; Waxman, A.B.; Leopold, J.A. Plasma Aldosterone Levels Are Elevated in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in the Absence of Left Ventricular Heart Failure: A Pilot Study. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2013, 15, 277–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Wang, Y.; Zhong, B.; Wu, Q.; Zhu, T.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, M. Aldosterone Contributed to Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Development via Stimulating Aquaporin Expression and Pulmonary Arterial Smooth Muscle Cells Proliferation. Pharmacology 2020, 105, 405–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Maron, B.A.; Zhang, Y.-Y.; White, K.; Chan, S.Y.; Handy, D.E.; Mahoney, C.E.; Loscalzo, J.; Leopold, J.A. Aldosterone Inactivates the Endothelin-B Receptor via a Cysteinyl Thiol Redox Switch to Decrease Pulmonary Endothelial Nitric Oxide Levels and Modulate Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Circulation 2012, 126, 963–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Rubens, C.; Ewert, R.; Halank, M.; Wensel, R.; Orzechowski, H.-D.; Schultheiss, H.-P.; Hoeffken, G. Big Endothelin-1 and Endothelin-1 Plasma Levels Are Correlated With the Severity of Primary Pulmonary Hypertension. Chest 2001, 120, 1562–1569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Vizza, C.D.; Letizia, C.; Petramala, L.; Badagliacca, R.; Poscia, R.; Zepponi, E.; Crescenzi, E.; Nona, A.; Benedetti, G.; Ferrante, F.; et al. Venous Endotelin-1 (ET-1) and Brain Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) Plasma Levels during 6-Month Bosentan Treatment for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Regul. Pept. 2008, 151, 48–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Silva Marques, J.; Martins, S.R.; Calisto, C.; Gonçalves, S.; Almeida, A.G.; de Sousa, J.C.; Pinto, F.J.; Diogo, A.N. An Exploratory Panel of Biomarkers for Risk Prediction in Pulmonary Hypertension: Emerging Role of CT-ProET-1. J. Heart Lung Transplant. 2013, 32, 1214–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Kümpers, P.; Nickel, N.; Lukasz, A.; Golpon, H.; Westerkamp, V.; Olsson, K.M.; Jonigk, D.; Maegel, L.; Bockmeyer, C.L.; David, S.; et al. Circulating Angiopoietins in Idiopathic Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Eur. Heart J. 2010, 31, 2291–2300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Richter, M.J.; Schermuly, R.; Seeger, W.; Rao, Y.; Ghofrani, H.A.; Gall, H. Relevance of Angiopoietin-2 and Soluble P-Selectin Levels in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Receiving Combination Therapy with Oral Treprostinil: A FREEDOM-C2 Biomarker Substudy. Pulm. Circ. 2016, 6, 516–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Enomoto, N.; Suzuki, S.; Hozumi, H.; Karayama, M.; Suzuki, Y.; Furuhashi, K.; Fujisawa, T.; Nakamura, Y.; Odagiri, K.; Ishikawa, T.; et al. Diagnostic and Prognostic Significance of Serum Angiopoietin-1 and -2 Concentrations in Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 15502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Rhodes, C.J.; Im, H.; Cao, A.; Hennigs, J.K.; Wang, L.; Sa, S.; Chen, P.-I.; Nickel, N.P.; Miyagawa, K.; Hopper, R.K.; et al. RNA Sequencing Analysis Detection of a Novel Pathway of Endothelial Dysfunction in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2015, 192, 356–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Sarrion, I.; Milian, L.; Juan, G.; Ramon, M.; Furest, I.; Carda, C.; Cortijo Gimeno, J.; Mata Roig, M. Role of Circulating MiRNAs as Biomarkers in Idiopathic Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Possible Relevance of MiR-23a. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2015, 2015, 792846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Wei, C.; Henderson, H.; Spradley, C.; Li, L.; Kim, I.-K.; Kumar, S.; Hong, N.; Arroliga, A.C.; Gupta, S. Circulating MiRNAs as Potential Marker for Pulmonary Hypertension. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e64396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Caruso, P.; Dempsie, Y.; Stevens, H.C.; McDonald, R.A.; Long, L.; Lu, R.; White, K.; Mair, K.M.; McClure, J.D.; Southwood, M.; et al. A Role for MiR-145 in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Evidence From Mouse Models and Patient Samples. Circ. Res. 2012, 111, 290–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Guo, L.; Qiu, Z.; Wei, L.; Yu, X.; Gao, X.; Jiang, S.; Tian, H.; Jiang, C.; Zhu, D. The MicroRNA-328 Regulates Hypoxic Pulmonary Hypertension by Targeting at Insulin Growth Factor 1 Receptor and L-Type Calcium Channel-Α1C. Hypertension 2012, 59, 1006–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Rodor, J.; Chen, S.H.; Scanlon, J.P.; Monteiro, J.P.; Caudrillier, A.; Sweta, S.; Stewart, K.R.; Shmakova, A.; Dobie, R.; Henderson, B.E.P.; et al. Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Profiling of Mouse Endothelial Cells in Response to Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Cardiovasc. Res. 2022, 118, 2519–2534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Hoeper, M.M.; Pletz, M.W.; Golpon, H.; Welte, T. Prognostic Value of Blood Gas Analyses in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Eur. Respir. J. 2007, 29, 944–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Harbaum, L.; Fuge, J.; Kamp, J.C.; Hennigs, J.K.; Simon, M.; Sinning, C.; Oqueka, T.; Grimminger, J.; Olsson, K.M.; Hoeper, M.M.; et al. Blood Carbon Dioxide Tension and Risk in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Int. J. Cardiol. 2020, 318, 131–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Hoeper, M.M.; Hohlfeld, J.M.; Fabel, H. Hyperuricaemia in Patients with Right or Left Heart Failure. Eur. Respir. J. 1999, 13, 682–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Nagaya, N.; Uematsu, M.; Satoh, T.; Kyotani, S.; Sakamaki, F.; Nakanishi, N.; Yamagishi, M.; Kunieda, T.; Miyatake, K. Serum Uric Acid Levels Correlate with the Severity and the Mortality of Primary Pulmonary Hypertension. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1999, 160, 487–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Wang, J.; Wang, Y.; Li, X.; Huang, Y.; Sun, X.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, M. Serum Uric Acid Is Associated with Disease Severity and May Predict Clinical Outcome in Patients of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Secondary to Connective Tissue Disease in Chinese: A Single-Center Retrospective Study. BMC Pulm. Med. 2020, 20, 272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Van Albada, M.E.; Loot, F.G.; Fokkema, R.; Roofthooft, M.T.R.; Berger, R.M.F. Biological Serum Markers in the Management of Pediatric Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Pediatr. Res. 2008, 63, 321–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Nickel, N.P.; Lichtinghagen, R.; Golpon, H.; Olsson, K.M.; Brand, K.; Welte, T.; Hoeper, M.M. Circulating Levels of Copeptin Predict Outcome in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Respir. Res. 2013, 14, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Alehagen, U. Association of Copeptin and N-Terminal ProBNP Concentrations With Risk of Cardiovascular Death in Older Patients With Symptoms of Heart Failure. JAMA 2011, 305, 2088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Gaheen, R.; El Amrousy, D.; Hodeib, H.; Elnemr, S. Plasma Copeptin Levels in Children with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Associated with Congenital Heart Disease. Eur. J. Pediatr. 2021, 180, 2889–2895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Mielniczuk, L.M.; Chandy, G.; Stewart, D.; Contreras-Dominguez, V.; Haddad, H.; Pugliese, C.; Davies, R.A. Worsening Renal Function and Prognosis in Pulmonary Hypertension Patients Hospitalized for Right Heart Failure: Pulmonary Hypertension and Cardiorenal Syndrome. Congest. Heart Fail. 2012, 18, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Takeda, Y.; Takeda, Y.; Tomimoto, S.; Tani, T.; Narita, H.; Kimura, G. Bilirubin as a Prognostic Marker in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. BMC Pulm. Med. 2010, 10, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Tokudome, T.; Kangawa, K. Physiological Significance of Ghrelin in the Cardiovascular System. Proc. Jpn. Acad. Ser. B 2019, 95, 459–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Müller, T.D.; Nogueiras, R.; Andermann, M.L.; Andrews, Z.B.; Anker, S.D.; Argente, J.; Batterham, R.L.; Benoit, S.C.; Bowers, C.Y.; Broglio, F.; et al. Ghrelin. Mol. Metab. 2015, 4, 437–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Nagaya, N.; Uematsu, M.; Kojima, M.; Ikeda, Y.; Yoshihara, F.; Shimizu, W.; Hosoda, H.; Hirota, Y.; Ishida, H.; Mori, H.; et al. Chronic Administration of Ghrelin Improves Left Ventricular Dysfunction and Attenuates Development of Cardiac Cachexia in Rats With Heart Failure. Circulation 2001, 104, 1430–1435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Schwenke, D.O.; Tokudome, T.; Shirai, M.; Hosoda, H.; Horio, T.; Kishimoto, I.; Kangawa, K. Exogenous Ghrelin Attenuates the Progression of Chronic Hypoxia-Induced Pulmonary Hypertension in Conscious Rats. Endocrinology 2008, 149, 237–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Schwenke, D.O.; Tokudome, T.; Kishimoto, I.; Horio, T.; Cragg, P.A.; Shirai, M.; Kangawa, K. One Dose of Ghrelin Prevents the Acute and Sustained Increase in Cardiac Sympathetic Tone after Myocardial Infarction. Endocrinology 2012, 153, 2436–2443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Yang, D.; Liu, Z.; Yang, Z. Ghrelin and Its Relation with N-Terminal Brain Natriuretic Peptide, Endothelin-1 and Nitric Oxide in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Hypertension. Cardiology 2013, 124, 241–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Yanagisawa, R.; Kataoka, M.; Inami, T.; Momose, Y.; Kawakami, T.; Takei, M.; Kimura, M.; Isobe, S.; Yamakado, M.; Fukuda, K.; et al. Usefulness of Circulating Amino Acid Profile and Fischer Ratio to Predict Severity of Pulmonary Hypertension. Am. J. Cardiol. 2015, 115, 831–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Kannel, W.B. Risk Factors in Coronary Heart Disease: An Evaluation of Several Serum Lipids as Predictors of Coronary Heart Disease: The Framingham Study. Ann. Intern. Med. 1964, 61, 888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Toth, P.P.; Barter, P.J.; Rosenson, R.S.; Boden, W.E.; Chapman, M.J.; Cuchel, M.; D’Agostino, R.B.; Davidson, M.H.; Davidson, W.S.; Heinecke, J.W.; et al. High-Density Lipoproteins: A Consensus Statement from the National Lipid Association. J. Clin. Lipidol. 2013, 7, 484–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Jonas, K.; Kopeć, G. HDL Cholesterol as a Marker of Disease Severity and Prognosis in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. IJMS 2019, 20, 3514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Heresi, G.A.; Aytekin, M.; Newman, J.; DiDonato, J.; Dweik, R.A. Plasma Levels of High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Outcomes in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2010, 182, 661–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Larsen, C.M.; McCully, R.B.; Murphy, J.G.; Kushwaha, S.S.; Frantz, R.P.; Kane, G.C. Usefulness of High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol to Predict Survival in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Am. J. Cardiol. 2016, 118, 292–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Zhao, Q.-H.; Peng, F.-H.; Wei, H.; He, J.; Chen, F.-D.; Di, R.-M.; Jiang, X.; Jiang, R.; Chen, Y.-J.; Heresi, G.A.; et al. Serum High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels as a Prognostic Indicator in Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Am. J. Cardiol. 2012, 110, 433–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Chen, J.; Rathinasabapathy, A.; Luo, J.; Yang, X.; Luo, P.; Chen, Y.; Li, Z.; Li, J. Differential Serum Lipid Distribution in IPAH and CHD-PAH Patients. Respir. Med. 2022, 191, 106711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Tresaco, B.; Moreno, L.A.; Ruiz, J.R.; Ortega, F.B.; Bueno, G.; González-Gross, M.; Wärnberg, J.; Gutiérrez, A.; García-Fuentes, M.; Marcos, A.; et al. Truncal and Abdominal Fat as Determinants of High Triglycerides and Low HDL-Cholesterol in Adolescents. Obesity 2009, 17, 1086–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Zavaroni, I.; Bonora, E.; Pagliara, M.; Dall’Aglio, E.; Luchetti, L.; Buonanno, G.; Bonati, P.A.; Bergonzani, M.; Gnudi, L.; Passeri, M.; et al. Risk Factors for Coronary Artery Disease in Healthy Persons with Hyperinsulinemia and Normal Glucose Tolerance. N. Engl. J. Med. 1989, 320, 702–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Sultani, R.; Tong, D.C.; Peverelle, M.; Lee, Y.S.; Baradi, A.; Wilson, A.M. Elevated Triglycerides to High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (TG/HDL-C) Ratio Predicts Long-Term Mortality in High-Risk Patients. Heart Lung Circ. 2020, 29, 414–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Lin, Y.-J.; Lin, J.-L.; Peng, Y.-C.; Li, S.-L.; Chen, L.-W. TG/HDL-C Ratio Predicts in-Hospital Mortality in Patients with Acute Type A Aortic Dissection. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord. 2022, 22, 346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Jonas, K.; Magoń, W.; Podolec, P.; Kopeć, G. Triglyceride-to-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Ratio and Systemic Inflammation in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Med. Sci. Monit. 2019, 25, 746–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Kopeć, G.; Waligóra, M.; Tyrka, A.; Jonas, K.; Pencina, M.J.; Zdrojewski, T.; Moertl, D.; Stokwiszewski, J.; Zagożdżon, P.; Podolec, P. Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Survival in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 41650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Zamanian, R.T.; Hansmann, G.; Snook, S.; Lilienfeld, D.; Rappaport, K.M.; Reaven, G.M.; Rabinovitch, M.; Doyle, R.L. Insulin Resistance in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Eur. Respir. J. 2008, 33, 318–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Yan, X.; Gao, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Qiu, X.; Tian, M.; Dai, J.; Zhuang, Y. Correlation of Lipid Ratios With the Severity of Pulmonary Alveolar Proteinosis: A Cross-Sectional Study. Front. Nutr. 2021, 8, 610765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Cracowski, J.-L.; Degano, B.; Chabot, F.; Labarère, J.; Schwedhelm, E.; Monneret, D.; Iuliano, L.; Schwebel, C.; Chaouat, A.; Reynaud-Gaubert, M.; et al. Independent Association of Urinary F 2 -Isoprostanes With Survival in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Chest 2012, 142, 869–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Reis, G.S.; Augusto, V.S.; Silveira, A.P.C.; Jordão, A.A.; Baddini-Martinez, J.; Neto, O.P.; Rodrigues, A.J.; Evora, P.R.B. Oxidative-Stress Biomarkers in Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension. Pulm. Circ. 2013, 3, 856–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Lopes, A.A.B.; Maeda, N.Y. Circulating von Willebrand Factor Antigen as a Predictor of Short-Term Prognosis in Pulmonary Hypertension. Chest 1998, 114, 1276–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Kawut, S.M.; Horn, E.M.; Berekashvili, K.K.; Widlitz, A.C.; Rosenzweig, E.B.; Barst, R.J. Von Willebrand Factor Independently Predicts Long-Term Survival in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Chest 2005, 128, 2355–2362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Bakouboula, B.; Morel, O.; Faure, A.; Zobairi, F.; Jesel, L.; Trinh, A.; Zupan, M.; Canuet, M.; Grunebaum, L.; Brunette, A.; et al. Procoagulant Membrane Microparticles Correlate with the Severity of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2008, 177, 536–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  134. Rosenthal, J.L.; Jacob, M.S. Biomarkers in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Curr. Heart Fail. Rep. 2014, 11, 477–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Shitrit, D.; Bendayan, D.; Bar-Gil-Shitrit, A.; Huerta, M.; Rudensky, B.; Fink, G.; Kramer, M.R. Significance of a Plasma D-Dimer Test in Patients with Primary Pulmonary Hypertension. Chest 2002, 122, 1674–1678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Pezzuto, B.; Badagliacca, R.; Poscia, R.; Ghio, S.; D’Alto, M.; Vitulo, P.; Mulè, M.; Albera, C.; Volterrani, M.; Fedele, F.; et al. Circulating Biomarkers in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Update and Future Direction. J. Heart Lung Transplant. 2015, 34, 282–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Frantz, R.P.; Farber, H.W.; Badesch, D.B.; Elliott, C.G.; Frost, A.E.; McGoon, M.D.; Zhao, C.; Mink, D.R.; Selej, M.; Benza, R.L. Baseline and Serial Brain Natriuretic Peptide Level Predicts 5-Year Overall Survival in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Chest 2018, 154, 126–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Rodriguez-Arias, J.J.; García-Álvarez, A. Sex Differences in Pulmonary Hypertension. Front. Aging 2021, 2, 727558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Hoeper, M.M.; Huscher, D.; Ghofrani, H.A.; Delcroix, M.; Distler, O.; Schweiger, C.; Grunig, E.; Staehler, G.; Rosenkranz, S.; Halank, M.; et al. Elderly Patients Diagnosed with Idiopathic Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Results from the COMPERA Registry. Int. J. Cardiol. 2013, 168, 871–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Ventetuolo, C.E.; Praestgaard, A.; Palevsky, H.I.; Klinger, J.R.; Halpern, S.D.; Kawut, S.M. Sex and Haemodynamics in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Eur. Respir. J. 2014, 43, 523–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  141. Farber, H.W.; Miller, D.P.; Poms, A.D.; Badesch, D.B.; Frost, A.E.; Rouzic, E.M.-L.; Romero, A.J.; Benton, W.W.; Elliott, C.G.; McGoon, M.D.; et al. Five-Year Outcomes of Patients Enrolled in the REVEAL Registry. Chest 2015, 148, 1043–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Benza, R.L.; Miller, D.P.; Gomberg-Maitland, M.; Frantz, R.P.; Foreman, A.J.; Coffey, C.S.; Frost, A.; Barst, R.J.; Badesch, D.B.; Elliott, C.G.; et al. Predicting Survival in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Insights From the Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-Term Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Disease Management (REVEAL). Circulation 2010, 122, 164–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  143. Docherty, C.K.; Harvey, K.Y.; Mair, K.M.; Griffin, S.; Denver, N.; MacLean, M.R. The Role of Sex in the Pathophysiology of Pulmonary Hypertension. In Sex-Specific Analysis of Cardiovascular Function; Kerkhof, P.L.M., Miller, V.M., Eds.; Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; Volume 1065, pp. 511–528. ISBN 978-3-319-77931-7. [Google Scholar]
  144. Foderaro, A.; Ventetuolo, C.E. Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension and the Sex Hormone Paradox. Curr. Hypertens. Rep. 2016, 18, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Cheron, C.; McBride, S.A.; Antigny, F.; Girerd, B.; Chouchana, M.; Chaumais, M.-C.; Jaïs, X.; Bertoletti, L.; Sitbon, O.; Weatherald, J.; et al. Sex and Gender in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Eur. Respir. Rev. 2021, 30, 200330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Tura-Ceide, O.; Blanco, I.; Garcia-Lucio, J.; del Pozo, R.; García, A.R.; Ferrer, E.; Crespo, I.; Rodríguez-Chiaradia, D.A.; Simeon-Aznar, C.P.; López-Meseguer, M.; et al. Circulating Cell Biomarkers in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Relationship with Clinical Heterogeneity and Therapeutic Response. Cells 2021, 10, 1688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Théry, C.; Witwer, K.W.; Aikawa, E.; Alcaraz, M.J.; Anderson, J.D.; Andriantsitohaina, R.; Antoniou, A.; Arab, T.; Archer, F.; Atkin-Smith, G.K.; et al. Minimal Information for Studies of Extracellular Vesicles 2018 (MISEV2018): A Position Statement of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles and Update of the MISEV2014 Guidelines. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2018, 7, 1535750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  148. Fadini, G.P.; Schiavon, M.; Rea, F.; Avogaro, A.; Agostini, C. Depletion of Endothelial Progenitor Cells May Link Pulmonary Fibrosis and Pulmonary Hypertension. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2007, 176, 724–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Han, Z.; Li, X.; Cui, X.; Yuan, H.; Wang, H. The Roles of Immune System and Autoimmunity in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Review. Pulm. Pharmacol. Ther. 2022, 72, 102094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Tomaszewski, M.; Bębnowska, D.; Hrynkiewicz, R.; Dworzyński, J.; Niedźwiedzka-Rystwej, P.; Kopeć, G.; Grywalska, E. Role of the Immune System Elements in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. JCM 2021, 10, 3757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Vergadi, E.; Chang, M.S.; Lee, C.; Liang, O.D.; Liu, X.; Fernandez-Gonzalez, A.; Mitsialis, S.A.; Kourembanas, S. Early Macrophage Recruitment and Alternative Activation Are Critical for the Later Development of Hypoxia-Induced Pulmonary Hypertension. Circulation 2011, 123, 1986–1995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  152. Fan, Y.; Hao, Y.; Gao, D.; Li, G.; Zhang, Z. Phenotype and Function of Macrophage Polarization in Monocrotaline-Induced Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Rat Model. Physiol. Res. 2021, 70, 213–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Kosanovic, D.; Luitel, H.; Dahal, B.K.; Cornitescu, T.; Janssen, W.; Danser, A.H.J.; Garrelds, I.M.; De Mey, J.G.R.; Fazzi, G.; Schiffers, P.; et al. Chymase: A Multifunctional Player in Pulmonary Hypertension Associated with Lung Fibrosis. Eur. Respir. J. 2015, 46, 1084–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  154. Ormiston, M.L.; Chang, C.; Long, L.L.; Soon, E.; Jones, D.; Machado, R.; Treacy, C.; Toshner, M.R.; Campbell, K.; Riding, A.; et al. Impaired Natural Killer Cell Phenotype and Function in Idiopathic and Heritable Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Circulation 2012, 126, 1099–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  155. Edwards, A.L.; Gunningham, S.P.; Clare, G.C.; Hayman, M.W.; Smith, M.; Frampton, C.M.; Robinson, B.A.; Troughton, R.W.; Beckert, L.E. Professional Killer Cell Deficiencies and Decreased Survival in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Immune Markers of Pulmonary Hypertension. Respirology 2013, 18, 1271–1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Tian, W.; Jiang, S.Y.; Jiang, X.; Tamosiuniene, R.; Kim, D.; Guan, T.; Arsalane, S.; Pasupneti, S.; Voelkel, N.F.; Tang, Q.; et al. The Role of Regulatory T Cells in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 684657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Blum, L.K.; Cao, R.R.L.; Sweatt, A.J.; Bill, M.; Lahey, L.J.; Hsi, A.C.; Lee, C.S.; Kongpachith, S.; Ju, C.-H.; Mao, R.; et al. Circulating Plasmablasts Are Elevated and Produce Pathogenic Anti-Endothelial Cell Autoantibodies in Idiopathic Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Eur. J. Immunol. 2018, 48, 874–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  158. Huertas, A.; Tu, L.; Humbert, M.; Guignabert, C. Chronic Inflammation within the Vascular Wall in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: More than a Spectator. Cardiovasc. Res. 2020, 116, 885–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Breitling, S.; Hui, Z.; Zabini, D.; Hu, Y.; Hoffmann, J.; Goldenberg, N.M.; Tabuchi, A.; Buelow, R.; Dos Santos, C.; Kuebler, W.M. The Mast Cell–B Cell Axis in Lung Vascular Remodeling and Pulmonary Hypertension. Am. J. Physiol.-Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2017, 312, L710–L721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  160. Fujimoto, M.; Sato, S. B Lymphocytes and Systemic Sclerosis. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 2005, 17, 746–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Perros, F.; Dorfmuller, P.; Souza, R.; Durand-Gasselin, I.; Mussot, S.; Mazmanian, M.; Herve, P.; Emilie, D.; Simonneau, G.; Humbert, M. Dendritic Cell Recruitment in Lesions of Human and Experimental Pulmonary Hypertension. Eur. Respir. J. 2007, 29, 462–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  162. Bharat, A.; Bhorade, S.M.; Morales-Nebreda, L.; McQuattie-Pimentel, A.C.; Soberanes, S.; Ridge, K.; DeCamp, M.M.; Mestan, K.K.; Perlman, H.; Budinger, G.R.S.; et al. Flow Cytometry Reveals Similarities Between Lung Macrophages in Humans and Mice. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol 2016, 54, 147–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Marsh, L.M.; Jandl, K.; Grünig, G.; Foris, V.; Bashir, M.; Ghanim, B.; Klepetko, W.; Olschewski, H.; Olschewski, A.; Kwapiszewska, G. The Inflammatory Cell Landscape in the Lungs of Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Eur. Respir. J. 2018, 51, 1701214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  164. Rose, J.A.; Wanner, N.; Cheong, H.I.; Queisser, K.; Barrett, P.; Park, M.; Hite, C.; Naga Prasad, S.V.; Erzurum, S.; Asosingh, K. Flow Cytometric Quantification of Peripheral Blood Cell β-Adrenergic Receptor Density and Urinary Endothelial Cell-Derived Microparticles in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0156940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  165. Gadalla, R.; Noamani, B.; MacLeod, B.L.; Dickson, R.J.; Guo, M.; Xu, W.; Lukhele, S.; Elsaesser, H.J.; Razak, A.R.A.; Hirano, N.; et al. Validation of CyTOF Against Flow Cytometry for Immunological Studies and Monitoring of Human Cancer Clinical Trials. Front. Oncol. 2019, 9, 415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Rathinasabapathy, A.; Rizzi, E.; Crabtree, A.; Yan, L.; Talati, M.; Robbins, I.M.; Austin, E.D.; Hemnes, A.; Hamid, R.; Kendall, P.; et al. A First Report on Mass Cytometry Immunophenotyping of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. In Proceedings of the B57. Inflammation and pulmonary hypertension! What’s new; American Thoracic Society: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 15 May 2020; p. A3832. [Google Scholar]
Table 1. Circulating Biomarkers in PAH.
Table 1. Circulating Biomarkers in PAH.
Heart Failure, Myocardial Stress and Injury, RemodelingInflammationEndothelial Cell Dysfunction and Smooth Muscle Cell ProliferationHypoxia/Organ and Tissue DamageMetabolic BiomarkersOxidative Stress Biomarkers In Situ Thrombosis
BNP
NT-proBNP
Troponins (T, I)
Cystatin C
sST2
Homocysteine
CRP
Galectin-3
RDW
GDF–15
Cytokines: (IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12p70)
OPN
Neopterin
MIF
NLR
ADM
ET-1
CT-proET-1
ADMA
ANG1
ANG2
Aldosterone
sVEGFR1
miRNAs
PaCO2
Creatinine
Uric acid
Copeptin
Bilirubin
HDL-c
TG/HDL-c ratio
Fischer’s ratio
Ghrelin
F2-isoprostane
Vitamin E
Glutathione
vWF
D–dimers
Biomarkers in PAH: ADM, adrenomedullin; ADMA, asymmetric dimethylarginine; ANG, angiopoietin; ANP, atrial natriuretic peptide; BNP, brain natriuretic peptide; CRP, C-reactive protein; CT-proET-1, COOH-terminal proendothelin 1; ET-1, endothelin 1; GDF-15, growth differentiation factor-15; HDL-c, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; IL, interleukin; MIF, macrophage migration inhibitory factor; miRNAs, micro-RNA; NLR, neutrophil–to–lymphocyte ratio; NT-proBNP, N-terminal fragment of pro-brain natriuretic peptide; OPN, osteopontin; PaCO2, partial pressure of blood carbon dioxide; PLC, platelet count; RDW, red blood cell distribution width; TG/HDL-c, triglyceride–high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio; TnI, troponin I; TnT, troponin T; UA, uric acid; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; vWF, von Willebrand factor.
Table 2. How to use biomarkers in the clinical management of PAH: an extended table showing different biomarkers discussed in this review.
Table 2. How to use biomarkers in the clinical management of PAH: an extended table showing different biomarkers discussed in this review.
BiomarkersSubjectsImportant Findings
Disease progressionBNP/NT-proBNP61 patients with IPAH [13]
1655 patients with PAH [15]
Correlation with hemodynamic parameters (i.e., PVR, CI, mean RAP) and exercise capacity [13,15]
ET-116 patients with IPAH [84]Positive correlation with PVR and disease severity [84]
RDW139 patients with IPAH [47]Related to disease severity [47]
OPN71 patients with PAH [60]An independent predictor of RV dilatation and dysfunction [60]
HDL-c76 IPAH patients [119]Serum HDL cholesterol levels were significantly decreased in patients with IPAH—an indicator of disease severity and progression [119]
ANG281 IPAH patients [87]ANG2 was statistically correlated with CI, PVR, and mixed venous oxygen saturation (mvSatO2) [87]
sFlt1, PIGF62 patients with IPAH [78]Early-stage diagnostic evaluation [78]
Therapeutic responseBNP/NT-proBNP1142 GRIPHON patients [14]First evidence of an association between NT-proBNP levels and treatment response [14]
sVEGFR162 patients with IPAH [79]Treatment response biomarker [79]
ADM13 patients [71]Promising endogenous peptide for the treatment of pulmonary hypertension [71]
PaCO2101 patients with IPAH
[96]
Increase in survival rate after treatment; limitations: retrospective design, all data came from a single center [96]
CRP1004 patients with PAH [41]Predicting responses to therapy in PAH [41]
Cystatin C59 patients with CHD–PAH [37]May be attributable to clinical decision-making regarding treatment intensity [37]
PrognosisBNP/NP-proBNP1426 patients with PAH [137]
1655 patients with PAH [15]
Strong predictor of 5-year survival [137]
Four–stratum model risk stratification more prognostically relevant [15]
TnT56 patients with PAH [17]Elevated levels represent more advanced disease [17];
does not represent a marker of early disease
TnI255 PAH patients [20] Used in routine clinical practice;
more severe hemodynamic and cardiac structural failure; high risk of mortality; poor outcomes; low specificity [20]
IL-6, -8, -10, and -12p7060 patients with IPAH and HPAH [57]Prognostic factors associated with low survival rates in IPAH [57]
PaCO2204 patients with IPAH [97]Independent prognostic value, risk assessment for major cardiovascular events [97]
Renal function (i.e., creatinine, BUN, uric acid)50 patients with CTD–PAH [100]UA levels might predict the severity and clinical prognosis of the disease
[100]
Bilirubin37 patients with PAH [106] Risk factor for death in patients with PAH [106]
Cystatin C14 patients with PAH [36]
59 patients with CHD–PAH [37]
CysC was accurately correlated with cardiac and hematological dynamics, e.g., RV pressure, function, and morphology [36]
CysC may represent a novel biomarker of PAH, predicting long-term mortality and clinical events in patients with CHD–PAH [37]
Limitation: small sample sizes
sST2104 patients [29]
40 patients with IPAH [30]
sST2 was correlated with disease severity and was a significant predictor of clinical worsening in patients with PAH [29,30]
RDW139 patients with IPAH [47]Potential prognostic biomarker related to disease severity, and may be used to predict survival [47]
CRP1004 patients with PAH [41]
225 CHD–PAH patients [42]
Predicting outcomes of PAH [41]
Should be incorporated in risk stratification and routine assessment of CHD–PAH [42]
GFR-1576 patients with IPAH [50]A new and promising prognostic biomarker of the risk of death in patients with IPAH [50]
Deserves further investigation
OPN70 patients with IPAH [59]Independent predictors of mortality [59]
NLR71 patients with PAH [63]Poor overall 5–year survival in PAH patients [63]
ADMA57 patients with IPAH [75]
30 patients with CHD–PAH [38]
High serum ADMA concentrations were associated with unfavorable pulmonary hemodynamics (i.e., higher mPAP and PVR) and worse outcomes in patients with IPAH and CHD–PAH [38,75]
Copeptin25 children with CHD–PAH [104]
92 PAH patients [102]
Predicting poor outcomes [104]
Circulating levels of copeptin were independent predictors of poor outcomes—a potentially useful biomarker in PAH [102]
HDL-c69 patients with PAH [117]
76 IPAH patients [119]
227 PAH patients [118]
Low plasma HDL-c was associated with higher mortality and clinical worsening in PAH [117]
Lower HDL-c levels were associated with lower event-free survival [119]
Higher HDL levels were associated with significantly lower mortality [118]
TG/HDL-c ratio122 patients with PAH [128]TG/HDL-c is a promising independent risk factor for the severity of PAH [128]
sVEGFR197 PAH patients [78]Correlation with disease progression as well as worse outcomes [78]
vWF66 PAH patients [132]High vWF levels at baseline and follow-up were associated with worse survival [132]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hojda, S.E.; Chis, I.C.; Clichici, S. Biomarkers in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 3033. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12123033

AMA Style

Hojda SE, Chis IC, Clichici S. Biomarkers in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Diagnostics. 2022; 12(12):3033. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12123033

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hojda, Silvana Elena, Irina Camelia Chis, and Simona Clichici. 2022. "Biomarkers in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension" Diagnostics 12, no. 12: 3033. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12123033

APA Style

Hojda, S. E., Chis, I. C., & Clichici, S. (2022). Biomarkers in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Diagnostics, 12(12), 3033. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12123033

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop