Fat necrosis, or cell death of adipose tissue, is a common benign condition that occurs from the lack of oxygen supply to adipose tissue [
1]. As common causes include trauma or post-surgical changes [
2], fat necrosis often presents as a palpable soft tissue mass at superficial regions [
3].
Ultrasound (US) is the first-line imaging tool for these superficial lesions, but imaging appearances are extremely varied [
4] due to the age of the lesion, which manifests as varying degrees of hardening, fibrosis, and degeneration. This often results in a diagnostic dilemma, which necessitates further cross-sectional imaging or invasive procedures, such as biopsy or excision for histological confirmation (
Figure 1 and
Figure 2). There is, hence, an unmet clinical need for an adjunct imaging modality to US to improve diagnostic capability.
Photoacoustic (PA) tomography, a hybrid optical imaging modality, is based on the light-induced ultrasound waves providing the contrast of optical imaging combined with the high spatial resolution of ultrasound [
5]. Its ability to provide the distribution of endogenous chromophores, such as blood oxygenation [
6], water [
7], lipid [
7,
8,
9,
10] and recently collagen [
11,
12], makes it attractive as a potential adjunct tool to various aspects of ultrasound. This is particularly useful in regions abundant with these chromophores, such as superficial soft tissues and the breast, or in fat-containing and fibrotic/necrotic conditions, such as fat necrosis. However, these theoretical advantages and usages of chromophore differentiations have not been demonstrated in daily clinical usage. Herein, we present interesting images that demonstrate for the first time the biochemical signatures of fat necrosis derived by PA and its agreement with histopathology (
Figure 3). A detailed description of PA imaging protocol and image reconstruction is included in
Appendix A. This work showcases the potential of PA as an adjunct for US to improve the diagnostic confidence for fat necrosis.
In this case, the authors have successfully demonstrated biochemical features of fat necrosis on PA as a first in-human demonstration with histopathological correlation. PA was able to identify the “mass-like” hypoechoic regions on US as fat-containing, rather than fat-replacing. On pathology, the lipid signals on PA correspond to liquefied necrotic fat from cystic degeneration, while the collagen signals on PA correspond to the fibrosis around the cavity. Hence, the biochemical capability of fat and collagen characterization could help to resolve ambiguous findings on US and improve diagnostic confidence for fat necrosis.
As it is crucial to obtain pathological correlation with US-PA images, excised tissues with no active blood signals had to be obtained. The authors believe the incorporation of blood signals in in vivo imaging would further intensify our understanding of the pathophysiology and respective imaging correlations for fat necrosis. Although the results from a single case may seem promising, more work must be done to validate these findings. In particular, more work must be done to validate findings of benign lipomas, fat necrosis, and malignant lipomatous tumors to investigate their biochemical differences. With more data, PA could potentially translate downstream into clinical imaging workflows for better characterization of superficial/breast lumps where fat-containing lesions are common. However, for widespread clinical adoption, there needs to be vast improvements in both hardware and software for PA imaging to improve its imaging depth (to at least 3–4 cm), its field of view, as well as spectral coloring.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, Y.G.; methodology, Y.G., G.B., H.M.T., C.W.Q.N., E.F., R.B., M.H., S.W.T., C.W.C., M.H., T.C.P., S.A.B. and Y.T.L.; software, Y.G., G.B. and H.M.T.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.G.; writing—review and editing, Y.G., G.B. and H.M.T.; supervision, M.O. and S.T.Q. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by (1) Agency of Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), under its BMRC Central Research Fund (UIBR) 2021 and (2) NMRC clinician-scientist individual research grant new investigator grant (CS-IRG NIG).
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of NATIONAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, SINGAPORE (2017/00805, date of approval: 12 October 2017) for studies involving humans.
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.
Appendix A
Appendix A.1. Materials and Methods
The excised lipoma was collected fresh from the operating theatre and subjected to US-PA imaging using the commercially available MSOT inVision 512-echo system (iThera Medical GmbH, Munich, Germany), fitted to a customized 2D handheld probe (specifications: 2D array of 256 detector elements (arranged along a 125° arc on a spherical surface: radius 40 mm and 5 MHz centre frequency)). The detector was placed on the inferior portions of the lipoma to image the “mass-like” nodules.
PA images were acquired at near infrared wavelengths—700, 730, 760, 800, 850, 920, 930, 970, 1000, 1050, 1064, and 1100 nm—to allow for deep-tissue imaging. Big differences in absorption of light at these wavelengths by chromophores in breast tissue, such as blood, lipid, and collagen, have aided the unmixing of these chromophores. Data were processed using ViewMSOT 3.8 software (Release 3.8, Munich, Germany) and reconstructed using the backprojection algorithm, after applying a bandpass filter with cut-off frequencies of 50 kHz and 6.5 MHz. The distribution of collagen and lipid were visualized through spectral unmixing of the reconstructed data.
References
- Genova, R.; Garza, R.F. Breast Fat Necrosis; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Chan, L.P.; Gee, R.; Keogh, C.; Munk, P.L. Imaging features of fat necrosis. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2003, 181, 955–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Taboada, J.L.; Stephens, T.W.; Krishnamurthy, S.; Brandt, K.R.; Whitman, G.J. The many faces of fat necrosis in the breast. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2009, 192, 815–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fernando, R.A.; Somers, S.; Edmonson, R.D.; Sidhu, P.S. Subcutaneous fat necrosis: Hypoechoic appearance on sonography. J. Ultrasound Med. 2003, 22, 1387–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Beard, P. Biomedical photoacoustic imaging. Interface Focus 2011, 1, 602–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, M.; Tang, Y.; Yao, J. Photoacoustic tomography of blood oxygenation: A mini review. Photoacoustics 2018, 10, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Diot, G.; Metz, S.; Noske, A.; Liapis, E.; Schroeder, B.; Ovsepian, S.V.; Meier, R.; Rummeny, E.; Ntziachristos, V. Multispectral Optoacoustic Tomography (MSOT) of Human Breast Cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017, 23, 6912–6922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Balasundaram, G.; Goh, Y.; Moothanchery, M.; Attia, A.; Lim, H.Q.; Burton, N.C.; Qiu, Y.; Putti, T.C.; Chan, C.W.; Hartmann, M.; et al. Optoacoustic characterization of breast conserving surgery specimens—A pilot study. Photoacoustics 2020, 19, 100164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lei, P.; Hao, J.; Wang, L.; Wen, X.; Xiong, K.; Zhang, P.; Zhang, L.; Yang, S. Reliability assessment on intravascular photoacoustic imaging of lipid: Ex vivo animal and human sample validation. J. Biophotonics 2020, 13, e202000162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, J.; Yang, S.; Ji, X.; Zhou, Q.; Xing, D. Characterization of lipid-rich aortic plaques by intravascular photoacoustic tomography: Ex vivo and in vivo validation in a rabbit atherosclerosis model with histologic correlation. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2014, 64, 385–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Goh, Y.; Balasundaram, G.; Tan, H.M.; Putti, T.C.; Tang, S.W.; Ng, C.W.Q.; Buhari, S.A.; Fang, E.; Moothanchery, M.; Bi, R.; et al. Biochemical “decoding” of breast ultrasound images with optoacoustic tomography fusion: First-in-human display of lipid and collagen signals on breast ultrasound. Photoacoustics 2022, 27, 100377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Regensburger, A.P.; Fonteyne, L.M.; Jüngert, J.; Wagner, A.L.; Gerhalter, T.; Nagel, A.M.; Heiss, R.; Flenkenthaler, F.; Qurashi, M.; Neurath, M.F.; et al. Detection of collagens by multispectral optoacoustic tomography as an imaging biomarker for Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Nat. Med. 2019, 25, 1905–1915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
| Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).