Next Article in Journal
Why Has Metabolomics So Far Not Managed to Efficiently Contribute to the Improvement of Assisted Reproduction Outcomes? The Answer through a Review of the Best Available Current Evidence
Previous Article in Journal
Accuracy of Pretreatment Ultrasonography Assessment of Intra-Abdominal Spread in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Prospective Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Diagnostics
Volume 11
Issue 9
10.3390/diagnostics11091601
diagnostics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Perfusion Patterns of Peripheral Organizing Pneumonia (POP) Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) and Their Correlation with Immunohistochemically Detected Vascularization Patterns

by
Ehsan Safai Zadeh
1,
Christina Carolin Westhoff
2,
Corinna Ulrike Keber
2,
Corinna Trenker
3,
Christoph Frank Dietrich
4,
Amjad Alhyari
5,
Charlotte Gabriele Luise Mohr
1 and
Christian Görg
1,5,*
1
Interdisciplinary Center of Ultrasound Diagnostics, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Philipps University Marburg, Baldingerstraße, 35033 Marburg, Germany
2
Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Philipps University Marburg, Baldingerstraße, 35033 Marburg, Germany
3
Haematology, Oncology and Immunology, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Philipps University Marburg, Baldingerstraße, 35033 Marburg, Germany
4
Department Allgemeine Innere Medizin (DAIM), Kliniken Hirslanden Bern, Beau Site, Salem und Permanence, 3018 Bern, Switzerland
5
Gastroenterology, Endocrinology, Metabolism and Clinical Infectiology, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Philipp University of Marburg, Baldingerstraße, 35033 Marburg, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2021, 11(9), 1601; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091601
Submission received: 12 August 2021 / Revised: 22 August 2021 / Accepted: 30 August 2021 / Published: 2 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Medical Imaging and Theranostics)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Purpose: To describe the perfusion patterns of peripheral organizing pneumonia (POP) by contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and their correlation with vascularization patterns (VPs) represented by immunohistochemical CD34 endothelial staining. Methods: From October 2006 until December 2020, 38 consecutive patients with histologically confirmed POPs were standardized-examined by CEUS. The time to enhancement (TE; classified as an early pulmonary-arterial [PA] pattern of enhancement vs. delayed bronchial-arterial [BA] pattern of enhancement), the extent of enhancement (EE; classified as marked or reduced), the homogeneity of enhancement (HE; classified as homogeneous or inhomogeneous), and the decrease of enhancement (DE; classified as rapid washout [<120s] or late washout [≥120s]) were evaluated retrospectively. Furthermore, tissue samples from the study patients were immunohistochemically stained with CD34 antibody. The presence of avascular areas (AAs) and the VPs were evaluated in all tissue samples. Results: The majority of POPs showed a BA pattern of enhancement (71.1%), an isoechoic marked enhancement (76.3%), and an inhomogeneous enhancement (81.6%). A rapid DE was observed in 50.0% of cases. On CD34 staining, all POPs had a chaotic VP, indicating BA neoangiogenesis. AAs (abscess, necrosis, hemorrhage) were identified in (41.9%) cases with an inhomogeneous enhancement on CEUS. Conclusion: On CEUS, POPs predominantly revealed a marked inhomogeneous BA pattern of enhancement with a rapid washout in 50% of cases. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the presence of a PA pattern of enhancement, found in 28.9% of POPs, did not exclude a BA neoangiogenesis as an important feature of chronic inflammatory and malignant processes.

1. Introduction

In 1901, the German pathologist W. Lange described for the first time the clinical and pathological features of organizing pneumonia (OP) on the basis of postmortem histological findings in two patients with cough, fever and dyspnea who died in hospital [1]. He termed the disease “bronchitis et bronchiditis obliterans” [1,2]. This term has since been replaced by the term “organizing pneumonia” to avoid confusion with the disease constrictive bronchiolitis obliterans [1,3]. OP is classified into cryptogenic and secondary OP. Cryptogenic OP cannot be attributed to a specific cause or a clinical constellation, whereas secondary forms of OP can be attributed to specific causes or may arise within a specific clinical context [1]. OP is a rare disease. A study from Iceland reported an incidence of 1.10/100,000 population for cryptogenic OPs and 0.87/100,000 for secondary forms of OP [4]. The radiologic findings on computed tomography (CT) or positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PET-CT) are nonspecific [1,5,6]. B-mode lung ultrasound (LUS) is considered to be a noninvasive complementary diagnostic method in addition to CT and PET-CT for the assessment of peripheral-based pulmonary lesions [7]. Furthermore, the visualization of the perfusion patterns of peripheral pulmonary lesions using contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) improves the specificity of the B-mode LUS for the evaluation of these lesions and has been described for pleurisy, community-acquired pneumonia, pulmonary infarcts, peripheral granulomatous lesions, and peripheral lung cancer [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. In contrast to the previous entities, to the best of our knowledge, neither B-mode LUS nor CEUS data for histologically confirmed OP have been reported in a large patient cohort. Therefore, knowledge regarding the features of these lesions in ultrasound as a widely used method in clinical practice is limited.
The aim of the present study was to describe the B-mode LUS features and the perfusion patterns of histologically confirmed peripheral organizing pneumonia (POP) using CEUS in a relatively large patient cohort and to correlate the sonographic findings with histopathological features and vascular patterns represented by immunohistochemical (CD34) endothelial staining in the corresponding lesions.

2. Materials and Methods

Between October 2006 and December 2020, a total of 598 patients with peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) were examined prospectively, and were standardized using CEUS by a single German Society for Ultrasound in Medicine (DEGUM) Level-III qualified examiner with more than 35 years of experience in the field of thoracic sonography (C.G., internal medicine) at a university US center [22]. All the PPLs were over 5 mm in size and detected through conventional six-point B-mode LUS [23]. All the patients were referred to the US center for the investigation of a PPL and/or other thoracic pathologies. The inclusion criteria for the retrospective analysis were (1) histological confirmation of OP and (2) a time difference of ≤4 weeks between the CEUS examination and histopathological sampling. Ultimately, 38 patients with proven POP met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. All the tissue samples from the study patients were immunohistochemically stained with CD34 antibody.
The ultrasound data were obtained according to the hospital guidelines during general clinical procedures, and they were prospectively collected and retrospectively evaluated. Informed consent was obtained from all the patients for the CEUS examination, and the study was approved by the local ethics committee and performed in accordance with the revised Helsinki Declaration.

2.1. Ultrasound Examinations

The B-mode LUS examinations were performed with an ACUSON SEQUOIA 512 GI ultrasound machine (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) and a 4C1 curved-array transducer with a frequency of 4 MHz. The CEUS investigations were conducted with the same transducer in contrast-specific mode (1.5 MHz) and in accordance with the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB) guidelines [24]. A bolus injection of 2.4 mL of the contrast medium SonoVue® (Bracco Imaging S.p.A., Milan, Italy) was performed via peripheral venous access. This was followed by 10 mL NaCl 0.9%. For the first 30 s, the perfusion patterns of the lesions were continuously examined and recorded by a clip. Subsequently, several short examinations were performed at one-minute intervals up to 3 min, and the changes in the perfusion pattern were saved as images [17]. All ultrasound examinations were performed in the upright sitting position and horizontal to the ribs [17].
The B-mode LUS and CEUS data were evaluated retrospectively by two independent, experienced investigators (E.S., C.G.). In the event of discrepancies, the final decision was made by a third experienced investigator (C.T.). Cohen’s kappa statistics were applied to measure interrater reliability. The following B-mode LUS data and CEUS parameters were evaluated retrospectively [17].

2.2. B-Mode Lung Ultrasound Parameters

  • The echogenicity of the lesion was classified as hypoechoic or iso-/hyperechoic, compared with the echogenicity of parenchymal organs used as an in vivo reference [17].
  • The border of the lesion was classified as smooth or irregular-delineated [17].
  • The size of the peripheral pulmonary lesion was classified as having a ≥2 cm or <2 cm diameter [17].

2.3. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Parameters

  • The time to enhancement (TE) of the contrast agent after intravenous injection was determined and classified as an early pulmonary-arterial (PA) pattern of enhancement (contrast enhancement of the lesion before the arrival of contrast agent in the thoracic wall) vs. delayed bronchial-arterial (BA) pattern of enhancement (contrast enhancement of the lesion simultaneous with the arrival of contrast agent in the thoracic wall or parenchymal organs) [17,19,25].
  • The extent of enhancement (EE) in the arterial phase was categorized as reduced EE (echo-free/hypoechoic) vs. marked EE (isoechoic) [17,19,25].
  • The homogeneity of enhancement (HE) was classified in the arterial phase as homogeneous enhancement vs. inhomogeneous enhancement of the POPs [14,16,17,18,20,26,27,28]. A perfused lesion with coexisting nonperfused areas (NPAs) was defined as an inhomogeneous enhancement [10,12,13,21].
  • The decrease of enhancement (DE) in the parenchymal phase (washout) was classified as a rapid washout (<120s) or a late washout (≥120s) [17,29].
The arterial phase was defined as the time from the earliest arrival of the contrast agent at the lesion to the peak of contrast agent enhancement of the lesion [17]. The parenchymal phase was defined as the time from the peak of contrast agent enhancement of the lesion to washout of contrast agent from the lesion [17]. Splenic tissue was considered as an in vivo reference to evaluate EE, HE, and DE (washout) of the contrast agent [17,19,30].

2.4. Histopathological Examination

All tissue samples were fixed in 4% formalin solution, embedded in paraffin, cut at a thickness of 4 μm, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) for routine purposes. Immunohistochemistry for CD34, a marker of endothelial cells [31], was performed using standard methods (EnVision+ Dual Link System-HRP, with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine as chromogen), detected by the monoclonal antibody QBEnd10 (each Agilent Dako, Waldbronn, Germany). All tissue samples were identified microscopically by an experienced pathologist (C.C.W.) as diseased lung tissue with OP. The following histopathological data were analyzed:
  • The presence of avascular areas in the POPs was determined in all lesions [17].
  • The vascular patterns with a regular alveolar pattern corresponding to the pulmonary capillary vascular pattern in healthy lung tissue [17] or acute pneumonia [17] as the corresponding pattern for PA supply (pattern A, Figure 1A), or disorganized and chaotic vascular patterns similar to BA neoangiogenesis in malignant lung tumors as the corresponding pattern for BA supply (pattern B, Figure 1B), were identified as described previously [17].

3. Results

3.1. Characteristics of the Participants

Of the 38 study patients, 31 were male and seven were female. The mean age of the patients was 60.8 ± 13.1 years (range 28–82 years). In 30 cases (78.9%) the diagnosis of secondary POP was made, and in eight cases (21.1%) the diagnosis of cryptogenic POP was made. Table 1 presents the final clinical diagnoses of POP in all study patients.

3.2. B-Mode Lung Ultrasound Data

On B-mode LUS, all POPs were hypoechoic (Figure 2B and Figure 3B). In 21/38 cases (55.3%) POPs showed an irregular border, and in 17/38 cases (44.7%) they showed a smooth delineated border. The size of the POPs was ≥2 cm in 34/38 (89.5%) cases and <2 cm in 4/38 cases (10.5%).

3.3. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Data

Regarding TE, 27/38 lesions (71.1%) revealed a delayed enhancement due to BA perfusion (Figure 2D), and 11/38 lesions (28.9%) revealed an early enhancement due to PA perfusion (Figure 3D). Regarding EE, 29/38 cases (76.3%) revealed a marked enhancement (Figure 3E) and 9/38 cases (23.7%) a reduced enhancement (Figure 2E). Furthermore, 7/38 lesions (28.4%) showed a homogeneous arterial enhancement (Figure 3E), and 31/38 lesions (81.6%) showed an inhomogeneous arterial enhancement with evidence of NPAs on CEUS (Figure 2E). The DE (washout time) was rapid (<120 s) in 19/38 lesions (50.0%) and late (≥120 s) in 19/38 lesions (50.0%) (Figure 2F and Figure 3F).
The agreement between the examiners for the ultrasound finding was “very good” (Cohen’s kappa = 0.70).

3.4. Histopathological Data and Their Correlation with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Pattern

All POPs were histologically confirmed to exclude malignancy. The histological confirmation was performed by ultrasound-guided biopsy in 25 cases (65.8%) (Figure 2C and Figure 3C) and by a thoracic surgical intervention in 13 cases (34.2%). The mean time difference between CEUS and histopathological sampling was 1.8 ± 1 weeks (range 1–4 weeks). A vascular pattern B similar to BA neoangiogenesis in lung tumors was found in all lesions (Figure 2G and Figure 3G). Moreover, in the 11/38 lung lesions (28.9%) that had a PA pattern of enhancement, the vascular pattern A similar to PA supply in healthy lung tissue [13] or acute pneumonia [13] was identified in addition to vascular pattern B (Figure 3G).
On immunohistochemical staining with CD34 antibody, avascular areas (abscess, necrosis, hemorrhage) in POP were identified in 13/31 cases (41.9%) with an inhomogeneous enhancement on CEUS.

4. Discussion

The diagnosis of OP is made according to defined histopathological criteria [1]. In the case of a histological diagnosis of OP, malignant or systemic inflammatory disease should be excluded, because in most patients an underlying disease is found as the cause of the OP [1,32]. In this study, the cause associated with OP was identified in 78.9% of patients, and these cases were classified as secondary OP. If the cause is not found, a careful follow-up should be performed in these patients in addition to the corresponding therapy [32]. If the underlying cause is not found in the follow-up, the disease is clinically termed as cryptogenic OP. The decision for histological confirmation as the first step in the diagnosis of POP is based on the clinical presentation and clinical background of the patient, as well as on radiological features of the lesions. In a standardized study over the course of 14 years, we studied such features of POP in CEUS.
To interpret the perfusion patterns of different pathologies using CEUS, it is essential to understand the corresponding histopathological vascularization features of the underlying lesion [17]. A recently performed study in granulomatous lung lesions demonstrated that a disorganized and chaotic vascular pattern on immunohistochemical staining with CD34 antibody could be considered as neoangiogenesis by bronchial arteries and could be correlated to a BA pattern of enhancement on CEUS regarding TE, EE, and DE [17]. Furthermore, in acute pneumonia, which is predominantly associated with a PA pattern of enhancement, and in normal lung tissue, the corresponding histopathological correlation [17] showed a regular alveolar vascular pattern on immunohistochemical staining with CD34 antibody [17].
Regarding TE in this study, on CEUS, POPs had a predominantly (71.1%) delayed systemic enhancement in the arterial phase, indicating a BA supply. In all tissue samples, a disorganized and chaotic vascular pattern was seen (Figure 2) as evidence of BA neoangiogenesis [17,33]. Furthermore, in all lesions with a PA perfusion pattern of enhancement (28.9%), a regular alveolar vascular pattern was partially present in the corresponding tissue sample as an indication of PA supply (Figure 3) [13]. These findings indicate that, in the presence of a PA pattern of enhancement, a BA neoangiogenesis, as an important feature of chronic inflammatory and malignant processes, cannot be excluded by CEUS. In these lesions, early PA enhancement covered the delayed arrival of contrast medium via BA supply.
Regarding HE and EE, 81.6% of cases presented an inhomogeneous enhancement and 76.3% a marked arterial enhancement in comparison with splenic enhancement. Avascular areas (abscess, necrosis, hemorrhage), as a histopathological correlation to an inhomogeneous enhancement, were identified in 13/31 cases (41.9%). In the remaining cases, a histopathological correlation was not demonstrated, based on the fact that avital tissues were avoided in the biopsy or histopathological examination. All POPs with a PA pattern of enhancement showed a marked enhancement similar to other pathologies with PA supply, such as compression atelectasis and acute pneumonias [9,13,19]. Furthermore, 18/27 lesions (66.7%) with a BA pattern of enhancement showed an isoenhancement that may be indicative of a marked neoangiogenesis [17].
Regarding DE, 50% of POPs revealed a rapid decrease of enhancement (<120s) in the parenchymal phase. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that the presence of late DE (>120s), as a further feature of benign pulmonary lesions [29], did not also exclude a BA neoangiogenesis.
Depending on the histopathologic features, peripheral pulmonary lesions may present similar perfusion patterns in CEUS regarding TE, EE, HE, and DE (Table 2). In this context, the chronic processes predominantly demonstrate a BA pattern of enhancement due to BA neoangiogenesis (Table 2). Furthermore, the chronic processes may reveal a rapid DE due to the abnormal veins and arteriovenous shunts associated with neoangiogenesis [17,29,34].
There are some limitations to this study. These include the retrospective nature of the investigation and the general limitations of ultrasound examinations, which are characterized by a high interobserver and interequipment variability. Furthermore, only approximately 70% of the pleural surface can be visualized in a US examination. Due to physical phenomena, such as interfacial reflections by air (with resulting artefacts) and absorption on bony structures, LUS is limited to pleural-based lesions located in visible parts of the visceral pleura [37,38,39]. It was not possible to blind the investigators to the study group, and blinded interpretations of the ultrasound data by the ultrasound examiner were not possible. Moreover, POPs are relatively rare; all the patients included in the study were referred to the Interdisciplinary Centre of Ultrasound Diagnostics for the investigation of a PPL and/or other thoracic pathologies, and were investigated in a standardized way by a single DEGUM-qualified Level-III examiner using the same B-mode LUS and CEUS protocol. Therefore, the data collection was conducted over a long period of time, and selection bias cannot be excluded. Moreover, the semi-quantitative classification of the findings probably leaves more room for interpretation than a quantitative measurement, whereby the interrater-observer variability for the ultrasound finding was made with “very good” agreement.

5. Conclusions

In summary, we found that POPs show a nonspecific pattern on CEUS. Predominantly, a marked inhomogeneous BA pattern of enhancement was seen, and there was a rapid (<120s) DE (washout) in 50% of cases. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the presence of a PA pattern of enhancement or delayed washout could not exclude a BA neoangiogenesis as an important feature of chronic inflammatory and malignant processes. In these lesions, the underlying BA supply is covered by the early PA pattern of enhancement. Because of an overlap of CEUS patterns between chronic inflammatory and malignant peripheral pulmonary lesions, the histological examination of these lesions is warranted.

Author Contributions

E.S.Z. and C.G. designed the study and were guarantors of the paper. E.S.Z. evaluated and interpreted the data and wrote the manuscript based on the support and comments of all other authors. All authors participated in the data preparation, literature search, and interpretation of results. C.G., E.S.Z., C.C.W., C.U.K., C.T., C.F.D., A.A. and C.G.L.M. reviewed the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of Philipps University Marburg (protocol code: EK_MR_26-06-20k_görg and date of approval: 26 June 2020).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study for ultrasound examinations.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The work of Ehsan Safai Zadeh is funded in part by a research grant from the Anneliese Pohl Foundation (Anneliese Pohl Stiftung), and we gratefully acknowledge this support. We thank Carsten Denkert, the Director of the Institute of Pathology and Cytology at the University Hospital Gießen and Marburg in Marburg, for supporting this study. Furthermore, we thank Viktoria Wischmann for providing expert technical assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

C. Görg received funding from Bracco Imaging. Bracco Imaging supported CEUS workshops at the University Hospital Marburg.

References

  1. Krupar, R.; Kümpers, C.; Haenel, A.; Perner, S.; Stellmacher, F. Cryptogenic organizing pneumonia versus secondary organizing pneumonia. Pathologe 2021, 42, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lange, W. Ueber eine eigenthümliche Erkrankung der kleinen Bronchien und Bronchiolen. (Bronchitis et Bronchiditis obliterans.). Dtsch. Arch. Klin. Md. 1901, 70, 342–364. [Google Scholar]
  3. Davison, A.G.; Heard, B.E.; McAllister, W.A.; Turner-Warwick, M.E. Cryptogenic organizing pneumonitis. QJM Int. J. Med. 1983, 52, 382–394. [Google Scholar]
  4. Gudmundsson, G.; Sveinsson, O.; Isaksson, H.J.; Jonsson, S.; Frodadottir, H.; Aspelund, T. Epidemiology of organising pneumonia in Iceland. Thorax 2006, 61, 805–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Zheng, Z.; Pan, Y.; Song, C.; Wei, H.; Wu, S.; Wei, X.; Pan, T.; Li, J. Focal organizing pneumonia mimicking lung cancer: A surgeon’s view. Am. Surg. 2012, 78, 133–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Marques, G.; Annweiler, T.; Raoux, D.; Tiffet, O.; Vergnon, J.M.; Bertoletti, L. Nodular presentation of a cryptogenic organizing pneumonia. Rev. Pneumol. Clin. 2011, 67, 314–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Dietrich, C.F.; Mathis, G.; Cui, X.-W.; Ignee, A.; Hocke, M.; Hirche, T.O. Ultrasound of the Pleurae and Lungs. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2015, 41, 351–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Görg, C. Transcutaneous contrast-enhanced sonography of pleural-based pulmonary lesions. Eur. J. Radiol. 2007, 64, 213–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Görg, C.; Bert, T.; Görg, K. Contrast-Enhanced Sonography for Differential Diagnosis of Pleurisy and Focal Pleural Lesions of Unknown Cause. Chest 2005, 128, 3894–3899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Görg, C.; Bert, T.; Kring, R.; Dempfle, A. Transcutaneous contrast enhanced sonography of the chest for evaluation of pleural based pulmonary lesions: Experience in 137 patients. Ultraschall Med. 2006, 27, 437–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Görg, C.; Kring, R.; Bert, T. Transcutaneous contrast-enhanced sonography of peripheral lung lesions. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2006, 187, W420–W429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Görg, C.; Bert, T.; Kring, R. Contrast-enhanced sonography of the lung for differential diagnosis of atelectasis. J. Ultrasound Med. 2006, 25, 35–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Görg, C. Perkutane Kontrastunterstützte Sonographie am Thorax; Bracco Imaging Deutschland Gmbh: Konstanz, Germany; Verlag Robert Gessler: Friedrichshafen, Germany, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  14. Safai Zadeh, E.; Beutel, B.; Dietrich, C.F.; Keber, C.U.; Huber, K.P.; Görg, C.; Trenker, C. Perfusion Patterns of Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions in COVID-19 Patients Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS). J. Ultrasound Med. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Safai Zadeh, E.; Dietrich, C.F.; Amjad, A.; Trenker, C.; Görg, C. Transcutaneous B-Mode Ultrasound (TUS) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) pattern of mediastinal tumors: A Pictorial Essay. J. Ultrason. Accept. 2021, in press. [Google Scholar]
  16. Safai Zadeh, E.; Görg, C.; Dietrich, C.F.; Görlach, J.; Alhyari, A.; Trenker, C. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Evaluation of Pleural Effusion: A Pictorial Essay. J. Ultrasound Med. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Safai Zadeh, E.; Keber, C.U.; Dietrich, C.F.; Westhoff, C.C.; Günter, C.; Beutel, B.; Alhyari, A.; Trenker, C.; Görg, C. Perfusion Patterns of Peripheral Pulmonary Granulomatous Lesions Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) and Their Correlation with Immunohistochemically Detected Vascularization Patterns. J. Ultrasound Med. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Safai Zadeh, E.; Weide, J.; Dietrich, C.F.; Trenker, C.; Koczulla, A.R.; Görg, C. Diagnostic Accuracy of B-Mode- and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Differentiating Malignant from Benign Pleural Effusions. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Findeisen, H.; Trenker, C.; Figiel, J.; Greene, B.H.; Görg, K.; Görg, C. Vascularization of Primary, Peripheral Lung Carcinoma in CEUS—A Retrospective Study (n = 89 Patients). Ultraschall Med. 2019, 40, 603–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Findeisen, H.; Trenker, C.; Zadeh, E.S.; Görg, C. Further aspects concering peripheral lung carcinoma in CEUS. Ultraschall Med. Eur. J. Ultrasound 2020, 42, 323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jacobsen, N.; Pietersen, P.I.; Nolsoe, C.; Konge, L.; Graumann, O.; Laursen, C.B. Clinical Applications of Contrast-Enhanced Thoracic Ultrasound (CETUS) Compared to Standard Reference Tests: A Systematic Review. Ultraschall Med. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Heese, F.; Görg, C. Diagnostische Wertigkeit einer internistischen Referenzsonographie (DEGUM-Stufe 3). Ultraschall Med. Eur. J. Ultrasound 2006, 27, 220–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lichtenstein, D.A. Lung ultrasound in the critically ill. Ann. Intensive Care 2014, 4, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Sidhu, P.; Cantisani, V.; Dietrich, C.; Gilja, O.; Saftoiu, A.; Bartels, E.; Bertolotto, M.; Calliada, F.; Clevert, D.-A.; Cosgrove, D.; et al. The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations for the Clinical Practice of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in Non-Hepatic Applications: Update 2017 (Long Version). Ultraschall Med. Eur. J. Ultrasound 2018, 39, e2–e44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Mathis, G. Chest Sonography; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  26. Bartelt, S.; Trenker, C.; Görg, C.; Neesse, A. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of embolic consolidations in patients with pulmonary embolism: A pilot study. J. Clin. Ultrasound 2016, 44, 129–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Trenker, C.; Apitzsch, J.C.; Pastor, S.; Bartelt, S.; Neesse, A.; Görg, C. Detection of peripheral embolic consolidations using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in patients with no evidence of pulmonary embolism on computed tomography: A pilot study. J. Clin. Ultrasound 2017, 45, 575–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Trenker, C.; Dohse, M.; Ramaswamy, A.; Michel, C.; Görg, C. Histological validation of pulmonary infarction detected with contrast-enhanced ultrasound in patients with negative computed tomography pulmonary angiogram: A case series. J. Clin. Ultrasound 2019, 47, 461–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Caremani, M.; Benci, A.; Lapini, L.; Tacconi, D.; Caremani, A.; Ciccotosto, C.; Magnolfi, A.L. Contrast enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in peripheral lung lesions: A study of 60 cases. J. Ultrasound 2008, 11, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Lim, A.K.P.; Patel, N.; Eckersley, R.J.; Taylor-Robinson, S.D.; Cosgrove, D.O.; Blomley, M.J.K. Evidence for Spleen-specific Uptake of a Microbubble Contrast Agent: A Quantitative Study in Healthy Volunteers. Radiology 2004, 231, 785–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Schlingemann, R.O.; Rietveld, F.J.; de Waal, R.M.; Bradley, N.J.; Skene, A.I.; Davies, A.J.; Greaves, M.F.; Denekamp, J.; Ruiter, D.J. Leukocyte antigen CD34 is expressed by a subset of cultured endothelial cells and on endothelial abluminal microprocesses in the tumor stroma. Lab. Investig. 1990, 62, 690–696. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  32. Zhou, Y.; Wang, L.; Huang, M.; Ding, J.; Jiang, H.; Zhou, K.; Meng, F.; Xiao, Y.; Cai, H.; Dai, J. A long-term retrospective study of patients with biopsy-proven cryptogenic organizing pneumonia. Chronic Respir. Dis. 2019, 16, 147997311985382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Bridgeman, V.L.; Vermeulen, P.B.; Foo, S.; Bilecz, A.; Daley, F.; Kostaras, E.; Nathan, M.R.; Wan, E.; Frentzas, S.; Schweiger, T.; et al. Vessel co-option is common in human lung metastases and mediates resistance to anti-angiogenic therapy in preclinical lung metastasis models. J. Pathol. 2017, 241, 362–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Nagy, J.A.; Chang, S.H.; Dvorak, A.M.; Dvorak, H.F. Why are tumour blood vessels abnormal and why is it important to know? Br. J. Cancer 2009, 100, 865–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Linde, H.N.; Holland, A.; Greene, B.H.; Görg, C. Contrast-enhancend sonography (CEUS) in pneumonia: Typical patterns and clinical value—A retrospective study on n = 50 patients. Ultraschall Med. 2012, 33, 146–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sartori, S. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in peripheral lung consolidations: What’s its actual role? World J. Radiol. 2013, 5, 372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Brogna, B.; Bignardi, E.; Brogna, C.; Volpe, M.; Lombardi, G.; Rosa, A.; Gagliardi, G.; Capasso, P.F.M.; Gravino, E.; Maio, F.; et al. A Pictorial Review of the Role of Imaging in the Detection, Management, Histopathological Correlations, and Complications of COVID-19 Pneumonia. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sperandeo, M.; Rotondo, A.; Guglielmi, G.; Catalano, D.; Feragalli, B.; Trovato, G.M. Transthoracic ultrasound in the assessment of pleural and pulmonary diseases: Use and limitations. Radiol. Med. 2014, 119, 729–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tinti, M.G.; Rea, G.; Frongillo, E.; Saponara, A.; Sperandeo, M. The Pathologic Patterns Detectable by Transthoracic Ultrasonography Are Only the Pleural and Subpleural Ones and Are Not Specific: Why Compare Them With High-Resolution Computed Tomography? J. Ultrasound Med. 2018, 37, 1847–1848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Diagnostics 11 01601 g001 550
Figure 1. Graphical representation of patterns of immunohistochemistry for CD34 as a marker of endothelial cells [31]. (A) A regular alveolar pattern corresponding to the pulmonary capillary vascular pattern in healthy lung tissue [17] or acute pneumonia [17], as the corresponding pattern for pulmonary arterial supply. (B) A disorganized and chaotic vascular pattern similar to bronchial arterial neoangiogenesis in malignant lung tumors, as the corresponding pattern for bronchial arterial supply [17].
Figure 1. Graphical representation of patterns of immunohistochemistry for CD34 as a marker of endothelial cells [31]. (A) A regular alveolar pattern corresponding to the pulmonary capillary vascular pattern in healthy lung tissue [17] or acute pneumonia [17], as the corresponding pattern for pulmonary arterial supply. (B) A disorganized and chaotic vascular pattern similar to bronchial arterial neoangiogenesis in malignant lung tumors, as the corresponding pattern for bronchial arterial supply [17].
Diagnostics 11 01601 g001
Diagnostics 11 01601 g002 550
Figure 2. A 62-year-old male patient with lung consolidation on (A) computed tomography (courtesy of Prof. Dr. Andreas H. Mahnken, Department of Radiology, University Hospital Marburg) and (B) B-mode ultrasound. (C) An ultrasound-guided 18G-core needle biopsy of the lung lesion was performed. The histopathological examination of the lesion presented the diagnosis of organizing pneumonia. On contrast-enhanced ultrasound, the lesion showed a delayed enhancement due to (D) a bronchial-arterial supply by peripheral (arrows) bronchial arteries, and (E) a hypoechoic and inhomogeneous pattern of enhancement with (F) an early decrease of enhancement. In the tissue sample, (G) immunohistochemical staining with CD34 was performed, and reorganized lung tissue with fibrotic tissue and a high capillary density in a rather disorganized and chaotic pattern was present, consistent with pattern B (×200).
Figure 2. A 62-year-old male patient with lung consolidation on (A) computed tomography (courtesy of Prof. Dr. Andreas H. Mahnken, Department of Radiology, University Hospital Marburg) and (B) B-mode ultrasound. (C) An ultrasound-guided 18G-core needle biopsy of the lung lesion was performed. The histopathological examination of the lesion presented the diagnosis of organizing pneumonia. On contrast-enhanced ultrasound, the lesion showed a delayed enhancement due to (D) a bronchial-arterial supply by peripheral (arrows) bronchial arteries, and (E) a hypoechoic and inhomogeneous pattern of enhancement with (F) an early decrease of enhancement. In the tissue sample, (G) immunohistochemical staining with CD34 was performed, and reorganized lung tissue with fibrotic tissue and a high capillary density in a rather disorganized and chaotic pattern was present, consistent with pattern B (×200).
Diagnostics 11 01601 g002
Diagnostics 11 01601 g003 550
Figure 3. A 59-year-old male patient with lung consolidation on (A) computed tomography (courtesy of Prof. Dr. Andreas H. Mahnken, Department of Radiology, University Hospital Marburg) and (B) B-mode ultrasound. (C) An ultrasound-guided 18G-core needle biopsy of the lung lesion was performed. The histopathological examination of the lesion presents the diagnosis of organizing pneumonia. On contrast-enhanced ultrasound, the lesion showed (D) a pulmonary-arterial (arrows), (E) isoechoic, and homogenous pattern of enhancement (F) with an early decrease of enhancement. (G) In the tissue sample, immunohistochemical staining with CD34 was performed. To the left, preserved alveolar lung vasculature surrounding normal or macrophage-filled lung alveoli (a) is evident in favor of pattern A. On the right, reorganized lung tissue with fibrotic and granulating tissue with a high capillary density in a rather disorganized and chaotic pattern (*) is present, consistent with pattern B (×100).
Figure 3. A 59-year-old male patient with lung consolidation on (A) computed tomography (courtesy of Prof. Dr. Andreas H. Mahnken, Department of Radiology, University Hospital Marburg) and (B) B-mode ultrasound. (C) An ultrasound-guided 18G-core needle biopsy of the lung lesion was performed. The histopathological examination of the lesion presents the diagnosis of organizing pneumonia. On contrast-enhanced ultrasound, the lesion showed (D) a pulmonary-arterial (arrows), (E) isoechoic, and homogenous pattern of enhancement (F) with an early decrease of enhancement. (G) In the tissue sample, immunohistochemical staining with CD34 was performed. To the left, preserved alveolar lung vasculature surrounding normal or macrophage-filled lung alveoli (a) is evident in favor of pattern A. On the right, reorganized lung tissue with fibrotic and granulating tissue with a high capillary density in a rather disorganized and chaotic pattern (*) is present, consistent with pattern B (×100).
Diagnostics 11 01601 g003
Table
Table 1. Final clinical diagnoses of N = 38 study patients with peripheral organizing pneumonia (POP).
Table 1. Final clinical diagnoses of N = 38 study patients with peripheral organizing pneumonia (POP).
POP Classificationn/N (%)
Cryptogenic POP8/38 (21.1%)
                                   Secondary POP
-
Infections
-
Nonhematologic malignancies
-
Hematologic malignancies
-
Systemic inflammatory diseases
30/38 (78.9%)
11/38 (28.9%)
9/38 (23.7%)
5/38 (13.2%)
5/38 (13.2%)
POP: peripheral organizing pneumonia.
Table
Table 2. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound perfusion patterns of pulmonary inflammatory and neoplastic lesions.
Table 2. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound perfusion patterns of pulmonary inflammatory and neoplastic lesions.
Underlying DiseaseAcute
Pneumonia		Neoplastic Pulmonary LesionsGranulomatous DiseaseOrganized Pneumonia
AuthorLinde et al. [35]Sartori et al. [36] *Safai Zadeh et al. [17]Present study
Cases50531038
Year2012201320212021
Pattern of enhancement on CEUS
TE: PA92.0%5.7%0%28.9%
BA8%94.3%100%71.1%
EE: Isoechoic74%54.7%0%76.3%
Hypoechoic26%45.3%100%23.7%
HE: Hom78%11.3%0%18.4%
Inhom22%88.7%100%81.6%
DE: RapidNot analyzed98.1% *100%50%
Late1.9% *0%50%
CEUS: contrast enhanced ultrasound; PA: pulmonal arterial; BA: bronchial arterial; Hom: homogeneous; Inhom: inhomogeneous; TE: time to enhancement; EE: extent of enhancement; HE: homogeneity of enhancement; DE: decrease of enhancement. * In this study, decrease of enhancement was in 98.1% < 180s and in 1.9% > 180s.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Safai Zadeh, E.; Westhoff, C.C.; Keber, C.U.; Trenker, C.; Dietrich, C.F.; Alhyari, A.; Mohr, C.G.L.; Görg, C. Perfusion Patterns of Peripheral Organizing Pneumonia (POP) Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) and Their Correlation with Immunohistochemically Detected Vascularization Patterns. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 1601. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091601

AMA Style

Safai Zadeh E, Westhoff CC, Keber CU, Trenker C, Dietrich CF, Alhyari A, Mohr CGL, Görg C. Perfusion Patterns of Peripheral Organizing Pneumonia (POP) Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) and Their Correlation with Immunohistochemically Detected Vascularization Patterns. Diagnostics. 2021; 11(9):1601. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091601

Chicago/Turabian Style

Safai Zadeh, Ehsan, Christina Carolin Westhoff, Corinna Ulrike Keber, Corinna Trenker, Christoph Frank Dietrich, Amjad Alhyari, Charlotte Gabriele Luise Mohr, and Christian Görg. 2021. "Perfusion Patterns of Peripheral Organizing Pneumonia (POP) Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) and Their Correlation with Immunohistochemically Detected Vascularization Patterns" Diagnostics 11, no. 9: 1601. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091601

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop