Next Article in Journal
Case Report of COVID-19 after Full Vaccination: Viral Loads and Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies
Next Article in Special Issue
Atrial Fibrillation and Peri-Atrial Inflammation Measured through Adipose Tissue Attenuation on Cardiac Computed Tomography
Previous Article in Journal
Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy in Oncological Surgery
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Histopathological Correlate of Peri-Vascular Adipose Tissue Attenuation on Computed Tomography in Surgical Ascending Aorta Aneurysms: Is This a Measure of Tissue Inflammation?
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

CT-Based Radiomics Helps to Predict Residual Lung Lesions in COVID-19 Patients at Three Months after Discharge

Diagnostics 2021, 11(10), 1814; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11101814
by Jia Huang 1,2,†, Feihong Wu 1,2,†, Leqing Chen 1,2, Jie Yu 1,2, Wengang Sun 1,2, Zhuang Nie 1,2, Huan Liu 3, Fan Yang 1,2,* and Chuansheng Zheng 1,2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Diagnostics 2021, 11(10), 1814; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11101814
Submission received: 15 September 2021 / Revised: 27 September 2021 / Accepted: 27 September 2021 / Published: 30 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Cardiopulmonary Imaging)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The presented work is of high clinical value.

It Deserves publication, after English revision

Either the title deserves improvment to be ellucidative about the obtained Results

Author Response

Response: We appreciate the reviewer’s comments and we have made extensive English revisions to our manuscript. In addition, we have improved the title to make it more concise and accurate.

Reviewer 2 Report

This study by Jia Huang and colleagues investigates the possible basis for using radiomics for evaluating future radiological outcomes in COVID-19 associated pneumonia. The data applies to a hospitalised cohort of patients with radiographic and clinical findings of COVID-19 pneumonia and investigates features on inpatient CT which may predict ongoing radiological abnormalities at 3 months.

I congratulate the authors on their work and agree with their methods and analysis. I have only some minor points of suggestion

Comments

Methods line 65 – please can you clarify what the intended meaning of the sentence is – does this mean informed consent was taken from the participants or was this waived for some reason?

Methods line 88 – how much manual segmentation was required? In all patients or some? Is there a time estimate spent on doing this?

Author Response

1) Methods line 65 – please can you clarify what the intended meaning of the sentence is – does this mean informed consent was taken from the participants or was this waived for some reason?

Response 1: We highly appreciate the reviewer’s comment and we are sorry that the meaning of this sentence is not very clear. Because this is a retrospective study, informed consent was waived. We have revised the text accordingly to make it clear.

2) Methods line 88 – how much manual segmentation was required? In all patients or some? Is there a time estimate spent on doing this?

Response 2: Dear reviewer, we performed manual segmentation in all patients and we have modified the corresponding content of the article to make it clear. Based on the pre-segmentation of uAI Intelligent Assistant Analysis System, it took us about 12 days to perform manual segmentation.

Back to TopTop