Next Article in Journal
Potential Receptors for Targeted Imaging of Lymph Node Metastases in Penile Cancer
Next Article in Special Issue
Both Autopsy and Computed Tomography Are Necessary for Accurately Detecting Rib Fractures Due to Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Previous Article in Journal
Association between EGFR Gene Mutation and Antioxidant Gene Polymorphism of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Proposed Procedure for Discriminating between Nasal Secretion and Saliva by RT-qPCR
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Diagnostics
Volume 10
Issue 9
10.3390/diagnostics10090693
diagnostics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Current Methods for Body Fluid Identification Related to Sexual Crime: Focusing on Saliva, Semen, and Vaginal Fluid

by
Koichi Sakurada
1,*,
Ken Watanabe
2 and
Tomoko Akutsu
2
1
Department of Forensic Dentistry, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan
2
First Department of Forensic Science, National Research Institute of Police Science, 6-3-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-0882, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2020, 10(9), 693; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10090693
Submission received: 20 August 2020 / Revised: 10 September 2020 / Accepted: 11 September 2020 / Published: 14 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Progress in the Forensic Diagnosis)
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

Although, DNA typing plays a decisive role in the identification of persons from blood and body fluid stains in criminal investigations, clarifying the origin of extracted DNA has also been considered an essential task in proving a criminal act. This review introduces the importance of developing precise methods for body fluid identification. Body fluid identification has long relied on enzymatic methods as a presumptive assay and histological or serological methods as a confirmatory assay. However, because the latest DNA typing methods can rapidly obtain results from very small and even old, poorly preserved samples, the development of a novel corresponding body fluid identification method is required. In particular, an immunochromatographic method has been introduced to identify saliva and semen from sexual crimes. In addition, for vaginal fluid identification, attempts have been made in the past decade to introduce a method relying on body fluid-specific mRNA expression levels. At present, the development of molecular biological methods involving microRNA, DNA methylation, and resident bacterial DNA is ongoing. Therefore, in criminal investigations, body fluid identification is an essential task for correctly applying the results of DNA typing, although further research and development are required.

1. Introduction

DNA analysis is used in most countries around the world to obtain individual genetic profiles and identify persons from biological samples linked to crimes for use in criminal investigations. At present, the short tandem repeat (STR) approach the main method used, which involves determining the number of repeats of several bases in multiple loci contained in the nuclear DNA of cells. In recent years, along with growth in the number of loci registered in the Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) DNA database [1], reagents with a large number of target loci have become widely used, such as the PowerPlex® fusion (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and the GlobalFilerTM PCR amplification kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). In particular, the GlobalFilerTM reagent amplifies 21 autosomal STR loci, DYS391 locus, Y indel locus, and amelogenin locus. Fujii et al. [2] reported that the probability of identity of these 21 autosomal loci obtained using GlobalFiler was 1.84 × 10−25 in Japanese population, which was remarkably higher than that (1.8 × 10−17) of the 15 autosomal loci obtained using AmpFLSTR Identifier kit (Life Technologies) [3].
However, it is often difficult to extract nuclear DNA from hair or from degraded samples. An alternative is mitochondrial DNA, which is present in large quantities in cells. The individual identification level of mitochondrial DNA is far below the STR approach [4], but effectively augments the value of other information used for investigations. In addition, DNA methodologies, such as Y-STR typing, single nucleotide polymorphisms, and next-generation sequencing technology have also been applied to various practical tasks [5,6,7]. Due to its reliability, DNA is widely recognized, not only by investigators, but also by the general public, as essential in criminal investigations.
The number of cells constituting the human body had previously been estimated to be about 60 trillion. However, the latest report by Sender et al. [8] of the Weizmann Institute of Science in Israel obtained a total of about 30 trillion, almost half of the previous estimate, and it is considered that the estimated number of cells will one day be further revised downward. In any case, we can safely say that the body is composed of a huge number of cells. As all of these cells have the same DNA, when body fluid is the residual crime-related sample used, the DNA origin is essential in proving the criminal act. In particular, in sexual crimes, the identification of saliva, semen, and vaginal fluid is often required, and biochemical, histological, or instrumental analysis methods that focus on the characteristic proteins and cells in each type of body fluid have long been used. However, detection sensitivity and specificity are greatly affected by the type of body fluid, methodological differences, and differences in the environment in which the sample is left. To keep pace with recent improvements in the discriminating power of DNA typing, precise body fluid identification is required now more than ever.
In this paper, we review the current methods for identifying body fluids related to sexual crime, and we discuss both conventional methods and the latest serological and molecular biological methods, focusing on saliva, semen, and vaginal fluid.

2. Flow of Forensic Examinations Using Biological Samples

The basic workflow for forensic examinations using biological samples involves the following: Visual examination, presumptive assay, confirmatory assay, blood typing, and DNA typing. The procedure and the examination name vary slightly depending on the type of body fluid to be examined and the condition of the sample. We will briefly describe the workflow for bloodstains as they are the most frequently examined samples. First, the visual condition, which includes color tone, size, and age, is examined. This is followed by the bloodstain presumptive assay, which is a chemical method that exploits the peroxidase-like activity of heme in hemoglobin. The leucomalachite green assay [9], the luminol assay [10], and the tetramethylbenzidine assay [11] are also widely used. The BLUESTAR® FORENSIC kit (BLUESTAR® Forensic, Monte Carlo, Monaco), which contains the luminol assay, is also available. The luminescence of this kit lasts longer than that of the normal luminol method and it does not require complete darkness.
Next, human blood identification is performed as a confirmatory assay. Previously, a serological assay using anti-human hemoglobin precipitin was used, but at present, the main method is a simple and rapid immunochromatography assay using anti-human HbA0 mouse antibody. BLUESTAR® OBTI (BLUESTAR® Forensic) is commercially sold and widely used as a forensic kit. However, OC-Hemocatch S (Eiken, Tokyo, Japan), a clinical reagent that is commercially available as a kit for detecting human HbA0 in fecal matter, has been introduced in Japan. The forensic utility of this reagent has been fully verified [12], and its cost performance is also favorable. Accordingly, it is actively used in criminal investigations. Clarification of whether the sample concerns menstrual blood [13,14,15,16,17], maternal blood [18,19,20], fetal blood [21,22], or postmortem blood [15,23] is also often required, and this identification is performed through assays that target proteins or expressed genes that are characteristic of each blood type.
After both the presumptive assay and the confirmatory assay show positive results, ABO blood grouping and finally DNA typing are performed. Various blood grouping methods, including that of the ABO blood type, were used for person identification when DNA typing was not available. However, ABO blood grouping is now often omitted, and it sometimes provides valuable information for narrowing down the subjects for DNA typing because the ABO blood group can be determined, not only from bloodstains, but also from saliva, semen, and hair [24,25,26]. As mentioned above, DNA typing is based on the STR type and sex determination on the amelogenin gene, and there is no doubt about their personal identification power.

3. Saliva Identification

For saliva identification, the amylase assay, which combines a presumptive and confirmatory assay, is the most important test. Although, α-amylase is present in all body fluids, the α-amylase activity of saliva is much higher than that of other body fluids [27,28] and it has, thus, been regarded as essential for saliva identification. Many animals also have α-amylase activity [27,29]: Mice, rats, guinea pigs, and squirrels have relatively high activity, whereas dogs, cats, cows, goats, sheep, and horses have little to no activity. Currently, a method using a reagent called blue starch, which is a blue dye chemically bound to starch, is used for the amylase assay. Many countries use the Phadebas method [30], based on the Phadebas® Amylase Test (Magle Life Sciences, Cambridge, MA, USA). This method uses a spectrophotometer to measure and quantify the blue pigment dissolved from blue starch by the α-amylase in saliva.
In contrast, a unique method called the blue starch agarose plate method [31], has been used for many years by investigators in Japan. In this method, powdered blue starch is mixed with a hot agarose solution to form a flat gel. A saliva stain sample cut to a few millimeters or less is directly placed on the flat gel, and the dissolution of the blue pigment is visually observed. The important point is that the assessment needs to be made within a reaction time of approximately 30 min to 1 h at 37 °C, which is the optimum temperature of the enzyme, and within a maximum of 2 h when the amount of saliva attached is extremely low [32]. In addition, the reagent SALIgAE® (Abacus Diagnostics, West Hills, CA, USA), which turns yellow when the substrate is decomposed by α-amylase in saliva, is also effective in saliva identification [33].
Furthermore, identification with a more specific method may be required. The serological methods that have been so far used for this purpose, include immunodiffusion and immunoelectrophoresis using polyclonal antibodies, such as anti-human salivary precipitin, anti-human salivary α-amylase precipitin, or anti-human sIgA precipitin [34]. However, it has become difficult to obtain high-titer polyclonal antibodies in recent years, and the frequency of their use is now extremely low. We have developed an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) targeting statherin as a new marker in saliva and attempted to introduce it into practice [28]. Although, statherin is slightly less sensitive than α-amylase in ELISA, it is highly specific and effective for saliva identification. Notably, statherin is found at high concentrations in nasal secretions [35]. Another saliva confirmatory test is the RSID™-Saliva (Independent Forensics, Lombard, IL, USA) kit for forensic science, which involves immunochromatography for human salivary α-amylase. It is widely used because it can be tested quickly and easily [36].
Research on saliva identification using genes has also been actively conducted since the beginning of the 2000s. In particular, real-time RT-PCR using the mRNA expression levels of salivary-specific proteins has been reported [37,38,39]. We have also confirmed the usefulness of the STATH and HTN3 genes [40,41] and performed various studies to introduce the method into practice [42,43,44]. In addition, methods focusing on microRNA [45,46,47,48,49,50] and DNA methylation [51,52,53,54,55,56] have been actively explored for saliva identification. At present, it would seem that further studies are necessary before microRNA and DNA methylation methods can be applied to practical work. Meanwhile, studies focusing on bacterial DNA such as Streptococcus salivarius, which parasitizes in the oral cavity, have also increased [57,58,59,60]. Such methods include the development of a simple and rapid method involving the loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) technique, as well as a useful method for deteriorated salivary stain samples.

4. Semen Identification

Semen is the most frequently examined body fluid in sexual crimes. Semen gives off a unique odor when it is fresh, whereas dried semen stains are pale yellow to gray in color and sometimes stiff and lustrous. However, when the amount and site of semen deposition is unclear, it is helpful to use a variable wavelength light source device such as a Polilight (Rofin Australia, Victoria, Australia).
Semen consists of sperm and seminal plasma. First, a presumptive assay is performed to detect acid phosphatase [61], which is found at high concentrations in seminal plasma. The acid phosphatase test has long been performed via colorimetric tests, such as a method using α-naphthyl phosphate and Fast Blue B and a method using phenolphthalein diphosphate and ammonia [62]. When the test is positive, the former develops a purple color that is stable for a long time, whereas the latter develops a reddish pink color that fades in a relatively short time. SM test reagent (Wako, Osaka, Japan), a kit that applies the former method, is commercially available and widely used in sexual crime investigations.
If the presumptive assay is positive, a sperm test is performed as the confirmatory assay. Microscopic examination involving tissue staining is generally performed. Various staining methods are used, such as Baecchi, Corin-Stockis, Christmas tree (Oppitz), and hematoxylin and eosin staining [63,64,65,66]. In particular, in Christmas tree staining, sperm show a red head and a green tail that are readily visualized [62]. A useful approach when the sample is old or difficult to distinguish from bacteria and dust is SPERM HY-LITER™ (Independent Forensics, Lombard, IL, USA), which is a commercially available kit involving a fluorescent label [67].
At the same time, serological methods using antibodies, can be applied to provide proof of seminal plasma. In particular, in the case of azoospermia or oligospermia, proof of seminal plasma is essential. Immunodiffusion and immunoelectrophoresis using high-titer anti-human semen precipitin [34] have long been used, but now an immunochromatography kit is the technique of choice. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is the oldest marker of seminal plasma [68], and SERATEC® PSA Semiquant (Seratec, Gottingen, Germany), which reacts to 1 million-fold diluted semen, has been frequently used as a highly sensitive kit [69]. However, PSA is also expressed in women’s periurethral glands [70,71,72], especially when they are on contraceptives, and it is highly possible to be tested PSA-positive without intercourse [73], indicating that caution is required when PSA is being evaluated alone without sperm. In contrast, seminogelin, derived from seminal vesicles, is a semen-specific antigen that is not detected in females [74], making it a reliable option for determining the presence of seminal plasma. RSIDTM-SEMEN (Independent Forensics, Lombard, IL, USA) is also commercially available as a kit containing anti-seminogelin antibody [75].
Many studies of semen identification using real-time RT-PCR have been reported [37,38,39]. In particular, SEMG1 and PRM2 are effective target genes [40] with high specificity. As PRM2 is expressed in the sperm itself, it will not be expressed in the semen of azoospermic individuals. In addition, as for saliva, there are many reports on the use of microRNA [45,46,48,49,50] and DNA methylation [51,52,53,54,55,56,76,77] in semen identification.

5. Vaginal Fluid Identification

Unlike other body fluids, vaginal fluid does not have characteristic proteins for identification, making it difficult to find proof of its presence. Examinations center on tissue stains, such as Papanicolaou (Pap) staining [78] and Lugol’s staining. In particular, the Lugol’s staining method has been considered effective because the inner surface of the vagina is covered with stratified squamous epithelial cells and contains abundant glycogen [79,80]. However, staining may also be seen in cells of the oral cavity [81,82], and it is now considered that careful evaluation is required. As serological methods, immunodiffusion and immunoelectrophoresis were previously performed using anti-human vaginal fluid precipitin [34]. However, the serological method is rarely performed given the high-titer antibody is not available.
In contrast, because many bacteria, including lactobacilli, parasitize the vagina, a test method has been developed that targets the 16S-23S rRNA genes of bacteria [83,84]. We previously demonstrated the usefulness of PCR amplification of the 16S rRNA of Lactobacillus crispatus, L. jensenii, and Atopobium vaginae [85]. In addition, there are reports on the identification of vaginal secretions by indigenous bacterial flora using next-generation sequencing [86,87], and on the effects of sexually transmitted diseases and their treatments on the bacterial flora [88,89].
As for saliva and semen, many studies have been conducted using real-time RT-PCR [38,90,91]. We have also performed similar studies [35,41] and have revealed the usefulness of multiplex detection specifically targeting ESR1, SERPINB13, KLK13, CYP2B7P1, and MUC4 genes [92,93] for vaginal fluid identification. Methods using microRNA [45,46,48,49] and DNA methylation [52,53,54,55] are also being examined. Furthermore, we have tried to develop novel methods for vaginal fluid identification by GC-MS targeting of 17β-estradiol (E2-17β) and by LC-MS targeting of small proline-rich protein 3 (SPRR3) and fatty acid-binding protein 5 (FABP5) [94,95].

6. Discussion

To identify body fluids, the classic techniques, which include enzymatic, serological, and histological methods using a microscope, have been the primary tools for many years. In particular, immunodiffusion and immunoelectrophoresis using high-specificity antibody were effectively used for body fluid identification when the samples were sufficiently secured and relatively fresh. However, with the recent remarkable progress in DNA typing methods, the number of test samples is increasing, as well as the need to analyze very small amounts of samples or old, poorly preserved samples. Therefore, body fluid identification with quicker and more accurate methods are more essential than ever before. Immunochromatographic methods are inevitably being introduced. In addition, molecular biological methods are being developed to keep pace with the DNA detection level. As a result, various new markers, t distinct from conventional markers, have been defined for each body fluid, and studies have been conducted to determine their feasibility for practical application.
Table 1 outlines the methods used to identify the various body fluids. For the body fluids often examined in relation to sexual crimes, the most active research is being conducted into the development of methods using gene-targeted mRNA, microRNA, or DNA methylation. Many researchers have been working on the practical application of mRNA methods for several decades, but the problem of mRNA stability remains [96,97]. Currently, microRNAs must be evaluated by the expression patterns of several markers [48,49,50], whereas for DNA methylation, a relatively large amount of template DNA is required [98]. Therefore, it may be difficult to perform an independent evaluation from a small sample or from stains containing multiple body fluids. To solve these problems, a method for simultaneously extracting RNA and DNA from the same sample and for identifying body fluid by mRNA, microRNA, and DNA methylation, along with STR typing, is also being developed [42,99,100,101,102,103]. Semen and vaginal fluid have often been the targets of sexual crime investigations, but in recent years, in addition to saliva, the need has grown to identify the skin fragments of suspects that become detached during the assault, which are called touch samples. The number of research reports regarding this sample type is increasing [104,105,106,107,108,109,110]. Furthermore, methods using Raman spectroscopy [111] or Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy [112] have been reported as non-destructive methods for analysis that do not even consume a minute amount of residual sample, although further studies are required before they can be practically applied.
In this review of the current methods for identifying body fluids related to sexual crime, we have discussed various methods currently in use, as well as the latest reports regarding the development of new methods, focusing on saliva, semen, and vaginal secretions. In criminal investigations, body fluid identification is an essential task in correctly applying the obtained results of DNA typing, and thus further research and development are essential.

Funding

This study was funded by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI, Grant Number 18K10138.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Hares, D.R. Expanding the CODIS core loci in the United States. Forensic. Sci. Int. Genet. 2012, 6, e52–e54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Fujii, K.; Watahiki, H.; Mita, Y.; Iwashima, Y.; Kitayama, T.; Nakahara, H.; Mizuno, N.; Sekiguchi, K. Allele frequencies for 21 autosomal short tandem repeat loci obtained using GlobalFiler in a sample of 1501 individuals from the Japanese population. Leg. Med. 2015, 17, 306–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Yoshida, Y.; Takahashi, K.; Kasai, K. Allele Frequencies of 15 loci using AmpFlSTR Identifiler Kit in Japanese population. J. Forensic Sci. 2005, 50, 718–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sekiguchi, K.; Imaizumi, K.; Fujii, K.; Mizuno, N.; Ogawa, Y.; Akutsu, T.; Nakahara, H.; Kitayama, T.; Kasai, K. Mitochondrial DNA population data of HV1 and HV2 sequences from Japanese individuals. Leg. Med. 2008, 10, 284–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Mulero, J.J.; Chang, C.W.; Calandro, L.M.; Green, R.L.; Li, Y.; Johnson, C.L.; Hennessy, L.K. Development and validation of the AmpFlSTR Yfiler PCR amplification kit: A male specific, single amplification 17 Y-STR multiplex system. J. Forensic Sci. 2006, 51, 64–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Watanabe, K.; Ikegaya, H.; Hirayama, K.; Motani, H.; Iwase, H.; Kaneko, H.; Fukushima, H.; Akutsu, T.; Sakurada, K. A novel method for ABO genotyping using a DNA chip. J. Forensic Sci. 2011, 56, S183–S187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Børsting, C.; Morling, N. Next generation sequencing and its applications in forensic genetics. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2015, 18, 788–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sender, R.; Fuchs, S.; Milo, R. Revised estimates for the number of human and bacteria cells in the body. PLoS Biol. 2016, 14, e1002533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Adler, O.; Adler, O. Über das Verhalten gewisser organisvher Verbindung gegenüber Blut mit besonderer Berücksichtigung des Nachweises von blut. Hoppe-Seylers Z. Physiol. Chem. 1904, 41, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Specht, W. Die Chemiluminescenz des Hämins, ein Hilfsmittel zur Auffindung und Erkennung forensisch wichtiger Blutspuren. Dtsch. Z. Gesamte Gerichtl. Med. 1937, 28, 225–234. [Google Scholar]
  11. Holland, V.R.; Saunders, B.C.; Rose, F.L.; Walpole, A.L. A safer substitute for benzidine in the detection of blood. Tetrahedron 1974, 30, 3299–3302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Akutsu, T.; Matsumura, K.; Tanaka, Y.; Watanabe, K.; Sakurada, K. Applicability of ‘OC-Hemocatch S’for the forensic identification of human blood. Jpn. J. Forensic Sci. Technol. 2014, 19, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  13. Asano, M.; Oya, M.; Hayakawa, M. Identification of menstrual blood stains by the electrophoretic pattern of lactate dehydrogenase isozymes. Forensic Sci. 1972, 1, 327–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Whitehead, P.H.; Divall, G.B. Assay of “soluble fibrinogen” in blood stain extracts as an aid to identification of menstrual blood in forensic science: Preliminary findings. Clin. Chem. 1973, 19, 762–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Miyaishi, S.; Kitao, T.; Yamamoto, Y.; Ishizu, H.; Matsumoto, T.; Mizutani, Y.; Heinekann, A.; Püschel, K. Identification of menstrual blood by the simultaneous determination of FDE-D Dimer and myoglobin contents. Jpn. J. Legal Med. 1996, 50, 400–403. [Google Scholar]
  16. Bauer, M.; Patzelt, D. Evaluation of mRNA markers for the identification of menstrual blood. J. Forensic Sci. 2002, 47, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Akutsu, T.; Watanabe, K.; Motani, H.; Iwase, H.; Sakurada, K. Evaluation of latex agglutination tests for fibrin-fibrinogen degradation products in the forensic identification of menstrual blood. Leg. Med. 2012, 14, 51–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Vallejo, G. Human chorionic gonadotropin detection by means of enzyme immunoassay: A useful method in forensic pregnancy diagnosis in bloodstains. J. Forensic Sci. 1990, 35, 293–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Vergote, G.; Heyndrickx, B.; Paredes, M. Forensic determination of pregnancy hormones in human bloodstains. J. Forensic Sci. Soc. 1991, 31, 409–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gauvin, J.; Zubakov, D.; von Rhee-Binkhorst, J.; Kloosterman, A.; Steegers, E.; Kayser, M. Forensic pregnancy diagnostics with placental mRNA markers. Int. J. Legal Med. 2010, 124, 13–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  21. Wraxall, B.G. The identification of foetal haemoglobin in bloodstains. J. Forensic Sci. Soc. 1972, 12, 457–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Katsumata, Y.; Sato, K.; Tamaki, K.; Tsutsumi, H.; Oya, M. Identification of Fetal Bloodstains by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Human Alpha-Fetoprotein. J. Forensic Sci. 1985, 30, 1210–1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sakurada, K.; Sakai, I.; Sekiguchi, K.; Shiraishi, T.; Ikegaya, H.; Yoshida, K. Usefulness of a latex agglutination assay for FDP D-dimer to demonstrate the presence of postmortem blood. Int. J. Legal Med. 2005, 119, 167–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Coombs, R.R.A.; Dodd, B. Possible application of the principle of mixed agglutination in the identification of blood stains. Med. Sci. Law. 1961, 1, 359–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Pereira, M. ABO and Lewis typing of semen, saliva and other body fluids. Haematologia 1984, 17, 317–322. [Google Scholar]
  26. Miyasaka, S.; Yoshino, M.; Sato, H.; Miyake, B.; Seta, S. The ABO blood grouping of a minute hair sample by the immunohistochemical technique. Forensic Sci. Int. 1987, 31, 85–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kipps, A.E.; Whitehead, P.H. The significance of amylase in forensic investigations of body fluids. Forensic Sci. 1975, 6, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Akutsu, T.; Watanabe, K.; Fujinami, Y.; Sakurada, K. Applicability of ELISA detection of statherin for forensic identification of saliva. Int. J. Legal Med. 2010, 124, 493–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chauncey, H.H.; Henriques, B.L.; Tanzer, J.M. Comparative enzyme activity of saliva from the sheep, hog, dog, rabbit, rat, and human. Arch. Oral. Boil. 1963, 8, 615–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, R. Determination of amylase activity. In Forensic Biology; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2008; p. 139. [Google Scholar]
  31. Miwa, J. Medico-legal studies on the human saliva (Part 3)—A basic study concerning the qualitative salivary test by blue starch agarose plate method. Nihon Univ. Dent. J. 1982, 56, 413–419. [Google Scholar]
  32. Sakurada, K. Current examination of objects related to biological samples: Focusing on saliva identification. Acta Crim. Japon. 2017, 83, 150–157. [Google Scholar]
  33. Miller, D.W.; Hodges, J.C. Validation of Abacus SALIgAE Test for Forensic Identification of Saliva. Available online: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Validation-of-Abacus-SALIgAE®-Test-for-the-Forensic-Miller-Hodges/4362b9f046cf783757e72b22b4e1dd8e3108c06a (accessed on 2 August 2020).
  34. Li, R. Precipitation-based assays. In Forensic Biology; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  35. Sakurada, K.; Akutsu, T.; Watanabe, K.; Fujinami, Y.; Yoshino, M. Expression of statherin mRNA and protein in nasal and vaginal secretions. Leg. Med. 2011, 13, 309–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Old, J.B.; Schweers, B.A.; Boonlayangoor, P.W.; Reich, K.A. Developmental Validation of RSID™-Saliva: A Lateral Flow Immunochromatographic Strip Test for the Forensic Detection of Saliva. J. Forensic Sci. 2009, 54, 866–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Juusola, J.; Ballantyne, J. Messenger ENA profiling: A prototype method to supplant conventional methods for body fluid identification. Forensic Sci. Int. 2003, 135, 85–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Juusola, J.; Ballantyne, J. Multiplex mRNA profiling for the identification of body fluids. Forensic Sci. Int. 2005, 152, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Nussbaumer, C.; Gharehbaghi-Schnell, E.; Korschineck, I. Messenger RNA profiling: A novel method for body fluid identification by Real-Time PCR. Forensic Sci. Int. 2006, 157, 181–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sakurada, K.; Ikegaya, H.; Fukushima, H.; Akutsu, T.; Watanabe, K.; Yoshino, M. Evaluation of mRNA-based approach for identification of saliva and semen. Leg. Med. 2009, 11, 125–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sakurada, K.; Akutsu, T.; Watanabe, K.; Miyasaka, S.; Kasai, K. Identification of body fluid stains using real-time RT-PCR: Discrimination between salivary, nasal, and vaginal secretions. Jpn. J. Forensic Sci. Tech. 2013, 18, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Watanabe, K.; Iwashima, Y.; Akutsu, T.; Sekiguchi, K.; Sakurada, K. Evaluation of a co-extraction method for real-time PCR-based body fluid identification and DNA typing. Leg. Med. 2014, 16, 56–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Akutsu, T.; Kitayama, T.; Watanabe, K.; Sakurada, K. Comparison of automated and manual purification of total RNA for mRNA-based identification of body fluids. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2015, 14, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Watanabe, K.; Akutsu, T.; Takamura, A.; Sakurada, K. Practical evaluation of an RNA-based saliva identification method. Sci. Justice 2017, 57, 404–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Hanson, E.K.; Lubenow, H.; Ballantyne, J. Identification of forensically relevant body fluids using a panel of differentially expressed microRNAs. Anal. Biochem. 2009, 387, 303–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zubakov, D.; Boersma, A.W.; Choi, Y.; van Kuijk, P.F.; Wiemer, E.A.; Kayser, M. MicroRNA markers for forensic body fluid identification obtained from microarray screening and quantitative RT-PCR confirmation. Int. J. Legal Med. 2010, 124, 217–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Courts, C.; Madea, B. Specific micro-RNA signatures for the detection of saliva and blood in forensic body-fluid identification. J. Forensic Sci. 2011, 56, 1464–1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sauer, E.; Reinke, A.K.; Courts, C. Differentiation of five body fluids from forensic samples by expression analysis of four microRNAs using quantitative PCR. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2016, 22, 89–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sirker, M.; Fimmers, R.; Schneider, P.M.; Gomes, I. Evaluating the forensic application of 19 target microRNAs as biomarkers in body fluid and tissue identification. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2017, 27, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mayes, C.; Seashols-Williams, S.; Hughes-Stamm, S. A capillary electrophoresis method for identifying forensically relevant body fluids using miRNAs. Leg. Med. 2018, 30, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Frumkin, D.; Wasserstrom, A.; Budowle, B.; Davidson, A. DNA methylation-based forensic tissue identification. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2011, 5, 517–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Lee, H.Y.; Park, M.J.; Choi, A.; An, J.H.; Yang, W.I.; Shin, K.J. Potential forensic application of DNA methylation profiling to body fluid identification. Int. J. Legal Med. 2012, 126, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Park, J.; Kwon, O.; Kim, J.H.; Yoo, H.; Lee, H.; Woo, K.; Kim, S.; Lee, S.; Kim, Y. Identification of body fluid-specific DNA methylation markers for use in forensic science. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2014, 13, 147–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lee, H.Y.; An, J.H.; Jung, S.E.; Oh, Y.N.; Lee, E.Y.; Choi, A.; Yang, W.I.; Shin, K.J. Genome-wide methylation profiling and a multiplex construction for the identification of body fluids using epigenetic markers. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2015, 17, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Silva, D.S.; Antunes, J.; Balamurugan, K.; Duncan, G.; Alho, C.S.; McCord, B. Developmental validation studies of epigenetic DNA methylation markers for the detection of blood, semen and saliva samples. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2016, 23, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Lin, Y.C.; Tsai, L.C.; Lee, J.C.; Su, C.W.; Tzen, J.T.; Linacre, A.; Hsieh, H.M. Novel identification of biofluids using a multiplex methylation sensitive restriction enzyme-PCR system. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2016, 25, 157–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Nakanishi, H.; Ohmori, T.; Hara, M.; Takada, A.; Shojo, H.; Adachi, N.; Saito, K. A Simple identification method of saliva by detecting streptococcus salivarius using loop-mediated isothermal amplification. J. Forensic Sci. 2011, 56, S158–S161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Choi, A.; Shin, K.; Yang, W.; Lee, H. Body fluid identification by integrated analysis of DNA methylation and body fluid-specific microbial DNA. Int. J. Legal Med. 2014, 128, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ohta, J.; Sakurada, K. Oral gram-positive bacterial DNA-based identification of saliva from highly degraded samples. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2019, 42, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ohta, J.; Noda, N.; Minegishi, S.; Sakurada, K. Application of DNA repair for streptococcus salivarius DNA-based identification of saliva from ultraviolet-exposed samples. Forensic Sci. Int. 2020, 306, 110077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kutscher, W.; Wolbergs, H. Prostataphosphatase. Z. Physiol. Chem. 1935, 236, 237–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Li, R. Analytical techniques for identifying semen. In Forensic Biology; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  63. Corin, G.; Stockis, E. Recherche des taches spermatique sur le linge. Arch. Anthropol. Crim. Med. Leg. 1908, 23, 852–864. [Google Scholar]
  64. Baecchi, B. Neue Methode zum Nachweis der Spermatozoen in Zeugflecken. Dtsch. Med. Wochenschr. 1909, 35, 1105–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Gluckman, J. The study of seminal stains by means of ultrasonic apparatus. J. Forensic Med. 1968, 15, 144–147. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  66. Oppitz, E. Eine neue Färbemethode zum Nachweis der Spermien bei Sittlichkeitsdelikten. Arch. Kriminol. 1969, 144, 145–148. [Google Scholar]
  67. Miller, K.; Old, J.; Fischer, B.; Schweers, B.; Stipinaite, S.; Reich, K. Developmental Validation of the SPERM HY-LITER™ Kit for the Identification of Human Spermatozoa in Forensic Samples. J. Forensic Sci. 2011, 56, 853–865. [Google Scholar]
  68. Sensabaugh, G.F. Isolation and characterization of a semen-specific protein from human seminal plasma: A potential new marker for semen identification. J. Forensic Sci. 1978, 23, 106–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Hochmeister, M.N.; Budowle, B.; Rudin, O.; Gehrig, C.; Borer, U.; Thali, M.; Dirnhofer, R. Evaluation of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) membrane test assays for the forensic identification of seminal fluid. J. Forensic Sci. 1999, 44, 1057–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Pollen, J.F.; Dreillinger, A. Immunohistochemical identification of prostatic acid phosphatase and prostate-specific antigen in female periurethral glands. Urology 1984, 5, 303–304. [Google Scholar]
  71. Wernet, N.; Albrech, M.; Sesterhenn, I.; Goebbels, R.; Bonkhoff, H.; Seitz, G.; Inniger, R.; Remberger, K. The female prostate: Localization, morphology, immunohistochemical characteristics and significance. Eur. Urol. 1992, 22, 64–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Breul, J.; Pickl, U.; Hartung, R. Prostate-specific antigen in urine. Eur. Urol. 1994, 26, 18–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Mannello, F.; Condemi, L.; Cardinali, A.; Bianchi, G.; Gazzanelli, G. High concentration of prostate-specific antigen in urine of women receiving oral contraceptive. Clin. Chem. 1998, 44, 181–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Lilja, H.; Abrahamsson, P.A.; Lundwall, A. Semenogelin, the predominant protein in human semen. Primary structure and identification of closely related proteins in the male accessory sex glands and on the spermatozoa. J. Biol. Chem. 1989, 264, 1894–1900. [Google Scholar]
  75. Old, J.; Schweers, B.A.; Boonlayangoor, P.W.; Fischer, B.; Miller, K.W.P.; Reich, K. Developmental Validation of RSID™-Semen: A Lateral Flow Immunochromatographic Strip Test for the Forensic Detection of Human Semen. J. Forensic Sci. 2012, 57, 489–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Watanabe, K.; Akutsu, T.; Sakurada, K. Development of a real-time PCR-based method for analyzing semen-specific unmethylated DNA regions and methylation status in aged body fluid stains. J. Forensic Sci. 2016, 61, S208–S212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, K.; Akutsu, T. Development of a DNA methylation-based semen-specific SNP typing method: A new approach for genotyping from a mixture of body fluids. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2018, 37, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Papanicolaou, G.N. A new procedure for staining vaginal smears. Science 1942, 95, 438–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Thomas, F.; Van Hecke, W. The demonstration of recent sexual intercourse in the male by the lugol method. Med. Sci. Law 1963, 3, 169–171. [Google Scholar]
  80. Jones Jr, E.L.; Leon, J.A. Lugol’s test reexamined again: Buccal cells. J. Forensic Sci. 2004, 49, 64–67. [Google Scholar]
  81. Rothwell, T.J.; Harvey, K.J. The limitation of the Lugol’s iodine staining technique for the identification of vaginal epithelial cells. J. Forensic Sci. Soc. 1978, 18, 181–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Hausmann, R.; Pregler, C.; Schellmann, B. The value of the Lugol’s iodine staining technique for the identification of vaginal epithelial cells. Int. J. Legal Med. 1994, 106, 298–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Fleming, R.I.; Harbison, S. The use of bacteria for the identification of vaginal secretions. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2010, 4, 311–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Giampaoli, S.; Berti, A.; Valeriani, F.; Gianfranceschi, G.; Piccolella, A.; Buggiotti, L.; Rapone, C.; Valentini, A.; Ripani, L.; Romano Spica, V. Molecular identification of vaginal fluid by microbial signature. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2012, 6, 559–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Akutsu, T.; Motani, H.; Watanabe, K.; Iwase, H.; Sakurada, K. Detection of bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA genes for forensic identification of vaginal fluid. Leg. Med. 2012, 14, 160–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Benschop, C.C.; Quaak, F.C.; Boon, M.E.; Sijen, T.; Kuiper, I. Vaginal microbial flora analysis by next generation sequencing and microarrays; can microbes indicate vaginal origin in a forensic context? Int. J. Legal Med. 2012, 126, 303–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Hanssen, E.N.; Liland, K.H.; Gill, P.; Snipen, L. Optimizing body fluid recognition from microbial taxonomic profiles. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2018, 37, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Fredricks, D.N.; Fiedler, T.L.; Thomas, K.K.; Mitchell, C.M.; Marrazzo, J.M. Changes in vaginal bacterial concentrations with intravaginal metronidazole therapy for bacterial vaginosis as assessed by quantitative PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2009, 47, 721–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Torcia, M.G. Interplay among Vaginal Microbiome, Immune Response and Sexually Transmitted Viral Infections. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Hanson, E.K.; Ballantyne, J. Highly specific mRNA biomarkers for the identification of vaginal secretions in sexual assault investigations. Sci. Justice 2013, 53, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Haas, C.; Hanson, E.; Anjos, M.J.; Ballantyne, K.N.; Banemann, R.; Bhoelai, B.; Borges, E.; Carvalho, M.; Courts, C.; De Cock, G.; et al. RNA/DNA co-analysis from human menstrual blood and vaginal secretion stains: Results of a fourth and fifth collaborative EDNAP exercise. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2014, 8, 203–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Akutsu, T.; Watanabe, K.; Takayama, A.; Sakurada, K. Quantitative evaluation of candidate and development of a multiplex RT-PCR assay for the forensic identification of vaginal fluid. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2017, 6, e211–e213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Akutsu, T.; Yokota, I.; Watanabe, K.; Sakurada, K. Development of a multiplex RT-PCR assay and statistical evaluation of its use in forensic identification of vaginal fluid. Leg. Med. 2020, 45, 101715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Sakurada, K.; Motani, H.; Akutsu, T.; Ikegaya, H.; Iwase, H. Identification of vaginal stains by detection of 17β-estradiol. Can. Soc. Forensic Sci. J. 2008, 41, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Igoh, A.; Doi, Y.; Sakurada, K. Identification and evaluation of potential forensic marker proteins in vaginal fluid by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2015, 407, 7135–7144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Sirker, M.; Schneider, P.M.; Gomes, I. A 17-month time course study of human RNA and DNA degradation in body fluids under dry and humid environmental conditions. Int. J. Legal Med. 2016, 130, 1431–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Mayes, C.; Houston, R.; Seashols-Williams, S.; LaRue, B.; Hughes-Stamm, S. The stability and persistence of blood and semen mRNA and miRNA targets for body fluid identification in environmentally challenged and laundered samples. Leg. Med. 2019, 38, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Naue, J.; Hoefsloot, H.C.J.; Kloosterman, A.D.; Verschure, P.J. Forensic DNA methylation profiling from minimal traces: How low can we go? Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2018, 33, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Parker, C.; Hanson, E.; Ballantyne, J. Optimization of dried stain co-extraction methods for efficient recovery of high quality DNA and RNA for forensic analysis. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. Suppl. Ser. 2011, 3, e309–e310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Omelia, E.J.; Uchimoto, M.L.; Williams, G. Quantitative PCR analysis of blood- and saliva-specific microRNA markers following solid-phase DNA extraction. Anal. Biochem. 2013, 435, 120–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Schweighardt, A.J.; Tate, C.M.; Scott, K.A.; Harper, K.A.; Robertson, J.M. Evaluation of commercial kits for dual extraction of DNA and RNA from human body fluids. J. Forensic Sci. 2015, 60, 157–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Lewis, C.A.; Layne, T.R.; Seashols-Williams, S.J. Detection of microRNAs in DNA extractions for forensic biological source identification. J. Forensic Sci. 2019, 64, 1823–1830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Watanabe, K.; Akutsu, K. Evaluation of a co-extraction kit for mRNA, miRNA and DNA methylation-based body fluid identification. Leg. Med. 2020, 42, 101630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Wickenheiser, R.A. Trace DNA: A review, discussion of theory, and application of the transfer of trace quantities of DNA through skin contact. J. Forensic Sci. 2010, 47, 442–450. [Google Scholar]
  105. Oorschot, R.A.H.V.; Ballantyne, K.N.; Mitchell, R.J. Forensic trace DNA: A review. Invest. Genet. 2010, 1, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Akutsu, T.; Watanabe, K.; Takamura, A.; Sakurada, K. Evaluation of skin- or sweat-characteristic mRNAs for inferring the human origin of touched contact traces. Leg. Med. 2018, 33, 36–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Ruan, T.; Barash, M.; Gunn, P.; Bruce, D. Investigation of DNA transfer onto clothing during regular daily activities. Int. J. Legal Med. 2018, 132, 1035–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Akutsu, T.; Ikegaya, H.; Watanabe, K.; Miyasaka, S. Immunohistochemical staining of skin-expressed proteins to identify exfoliated epidermal cells for forensic purposes. Forensic Sci. Int. 2019, 303, 109940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Sessa, F.; Salerno, M.; Bertozzi, G.; Messina, G.; Ricci, P.; Ledda, C.; Rapisarda, V.; Cantatore, S.; Turillazzi, E.; Pomara, C. Touch DNA: Impact of handling time on touch deposit and evaluation of different recovery techniques: An experimental study. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 9542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Neckovic, A.; van Oorschot, R.A.H.; Szkuta, B.; Durdle, A. Investigation of direct and indirect transfer of microbiomes between individuals. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2020, 45, 102212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Virkler, K.; Lednev, I. Raman spectroscopy offers great potential for the nondestructive confirmatory identification of body fluids. Forensic Sci. Int. 2008, 181, e1–e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Takamura, A.; Watanabe, K.; Akutsu, T.; Ozawa, T. Soft and robust identification of body fluid using fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and chemometric strategies for forensic analysis. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 8459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Assays for the identification of body fluids.
Table 1. Assays for the identification of body fluids.
Body FluidEnzymaticSerologicalMicroscopicMolecular BiologicalMicro-BiologicalOther
SalivaColorimetry
Phadebas®
SALIgAE®
Blue starch agarose plate method
[30,31,32,33]		Immunodiffusion Immunoelectrophoresis
ELISA
Immunochromatography
RSIDTM-Saliva
[28,34,35,36]		 mRNA
microRNA
DNA methylation
[37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56]		Oral bacteria
[57,58,59,60]
SemenAcid phosphatase test
[61,62]		Immunodiffusion
Immunoelectrophoresis
Immunochromatography
SPERM HY-LITERTM
SERATEC®PSA
Semiquant
RSIDTM-Semen
[34,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75]		Baecchi staining
Corin-Stockis staining
Oppitz staining
Hematoxylin & eosin staining
[62,63,64,65,66]		mRNA
microRNA
DNA methylation
[37,38,39,40,45,46,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,76,77]
Vaginal fluid Immunodiffusion Immunoelectrophoresis
[34]		Papanicolaou staining
Lugol’s staining
[79,80,81,82]		mRNA
microRNA
DNA methylation
[35,38,41,45,46,48,49,52,53,54,55,90,91,92,93]		Vaginal bacteria
[83,84,85,86,87,88,89]		GC-MS
LC-MS
[94,95]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sakurada, K.; Watanabe, K.; Akutsu, T. Current Methods for Body Fluid Identification Related to Sexual Crime: Focusing on Saliva, Semen, and Vaginal Fluid. Diagnostics 2020, 10, 693. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10090693

AMA Style

Sakurada K, Watanabe K, Akutsu T. Current Methods for Body Fluid Identification Related to Sexual Crime: Focusing on Saliva, Semen, and Vaginal Fluid. Diagnostics. 2020; 10(9):693. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10090693

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sakurada, Koichi, Ken Watanabe, and Tomoko Akutsu. 2020. "Current Methods for Body Fluid Identification Related to Sexual Crime: Focusing on Saliva, Semen, and Vaginal Fluid" Diagnostics 10, no. 9: 693. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10090693

APA Style

Sakurada, K., Watanabe, K., & Akutsu, T. (2020). Current Methods for Body Fluid Identification Related to Sexual Crime: Focusing on Saliva, Semen, and Vaginal Fluid. Diagnostics, 10(9), 693. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10090693

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop