The authors wish to make the following corrections to this paper [1].
In the published version, the resection rate numbers as reported by Kok et al. [2] were cited incorrectly in the Introduction section on page 2.
The sentence “Among patients operated on for LRRC, R0 resection rate using surgical navigation was 21% compared with 51% in a case control group” should be changed to “Among patients operated on for LRRC, R0 resection rate using surgical navigation was 79% compared with 49% in a case control group”.
The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.
References
- Groen, H.C.; den Hartog, A.G.; Heerink, W.J.; Kuhlmann, K.F.D.; Kok, N.F.M.; van Veen, R.; Hiep, M.A.J.; Snaebjornsson, P.; Grotenhuis, B.A.; Beets, G.L.; et al. Use of Image-Guided Surgical Navigation during Resection of Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer. Life 2022, 12, 645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kok, E.N.D.; van Veen, R.; Groen, H.C.; Heerink, W.J.; Hoetjes, N.J.; van Werkhoven, E.; Beets, G.L.; Aalbers, A.G.J.; Kuhlmann, K.F.D.; Nijkamp, J.; et al. Association of Image-Guided Navigation with Complete Resection Rate in Patients with Locally Advanced Primary and Recurrent Rectal Cancer. JAMA Netw. Open 2020, 3, e208522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).