Next Article in Journal
Molecular Taxonomy and Diversification of Atlantic Skates (Chondrichthyes, Rajiformes): Adding More Pieces to the Puzzle of Their Evolutionary History
Next Article in Special Issue
The Interplay of Mitophagy and Inflammation in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy
Previous Article in Journal
Molecular Genetics in Epstein–Barr Virus-Associated Malignancies
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Life
Volume 11
Issue 7
10.3390/life11070595
life-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Mass Spectrometric Profiling of Extraocular Muscle and Proteomic Adaptations in the mdx-4cv Model of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

by
Stephen Gargan
1,2,
Paul Dowling
1,2,
Margit Zweyer
3,
Jens Reimann
4,
Michael Henry
5,
Paula Meleady
5,
Dieter Swandulla
6 and
Kay Ohlendieck
1,2,*
1
Department of Biology, National University of Ireland, Co. Kildare, W23F2H6 Maynooth, Ireland
2
Kathleen Lonsdale Institute for Human Health Research, Maynooth University, Co. Kildare, W23F2H6 Maynooth, Ireland
3
Department of Neonatology and Paediatric Intensive Care, Children’s Hospital, University of Bonn, D53113 Bonn, Germany
4
Department of Neurology, University Hospital, University of Bonn, D53113 Bonn, Germany
5
National Institute for Cellular Biotechnology, Dublin City University, D09V209 Dublin, Ireland
6
Institute of Physiology II, University of Bonn, D53115 Bonn, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Life 2021, 11(7), 595; https://doi.org/10.3390/life11070595
Submission received: 20 May 2021 / Revised: 15 June 2021 / Accepted: 17 June 2021 / Published: 22 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Strategies)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Extraocular muscles (EOMs) represent a specialized type of contractile tissue with unique cellular, physiological, and biochemical properties. In Duchenne muscular dystrophy, EOMs stay functionally unaffected in the course of disease progression. Therefore, it was of interest to determine their proteomic profile in dystrophinopathy. The proteomic survey of wild type mice and the dystrophic mdx-4cv model revealed a broad spectrum of sarcomere-associated proteoforms, including components of the thick filament, thin filament, M-band and Z-disk, as well as a variety of muscle-specific markers. Interestingly, the mass spectrometric analysis revealed unusual expression levels of contractile proteins, especially isoforms of myosin heavy chain. As compared to diaphragm muscle, both proteomics and immunoblotting established isoform MyHC14 as a new potential marker in wild type EOMs, in addition to the previously identified isoforms MyHC13 and MyHC15. Comparative proteomics was employed to establish alterations in the protein expression profile between normal EOMs and dystrophin-lacking EOMs. The analysis of mdx-4cv EOMs identified elevated levels of glycolytic enzymes and molecular chaperones, as well as decreases in mitochondrial enzymes. These findings suggest a process of adaptation in dystrophin-deficient EOMs via a bioenergetic shift to more glycolytic metabolism, as well as an efficient cellular stress response in EOMs in dystrophinopathy.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

As one of the most abundant cellular entities in the human body, the diverse types of skeletal muscle fibre form the contractile units of over 650 individual muscles. Voluntary striated muscles differ considerably in their histological, anatomical, metabolic, biochemical, and physiological specialization between predominantly slow-twitching versus fast-twitching phenotypes [1]. A distinctly different subtype of skeletal muscles, as compared to non-craniofacial muscles, is presented by extraocular muscles (EOMs) [2,3], which control the movements of the eyes [4]. The finely tuned and highly coordinated actions of six EOMs, i.e., M. obliquus superior, M. obliquus inferior, M. rectus medialis, M. rectus lateralis, M. rectus superior, and M. rectus inferior [5], provide the eyeball with a wide range of complex movements about its horizontal and vertical axis. This includes a diverse range of eye movements ranging from gaze-holding to slow vergence, smooth pursuit convergence, optokinetic responses, vestibulo-ocular reflexes, and rapid saccades [6].
Characteristic biological features of EOMs include (i) unique developmental processes with specific upstream activators [7,8], (ii) longitudinal dispersion of multiterminal neuromuscular junctions [9,10,11], (iii) morphologically distinct muscle spindles as compared to conventional somatic spindles [12], (iv) an unusually high capacity for cellular remodelling and fibre regeneration [13,14], (v) an efficient calcium handling and extrusion system [15], (vi) high levels of fatigue resistance even in extremely fast-twitching fibres [16] and (vii) distinguishing combinations of contractile protein isoform expression patterns [17]. Another striking biomedical feature of EOMs is their apparent resistance to degeneration in X-linked muscular dystrophy [18,19,20].
Duchenne muscular dystrophy is an X-chromosomally inherited and severely debilitating disorder of early childhood that primarily affects contractile tissues [21]. Mutations in the DMD gene result in the almost complete loss of the full-length isoform of dystrophin, which exhibits high levels of sequence similarity with membrane cytoskeletal proteins, and the concomitant reduction in a variety of sarcolemmal glycoproteins [22]. The extremely large DMD gene contains seven different promoters that are involved in the tissue-specific expression of several small dystrophin isoforms, i.e., Dp45 (central nervous system), Dp71-G (ubiquitous), Dp116-S (Schwann cells), Dp140-B/K (brain and kidney) and Dp260-R (retina), as well as the large dystrophins, i.e., Dp427-M (skeletal muscle, heart muscle, smooth muscle), Dp427-B (brain) and Dp427-P (Purkinje cells) [23].
The collapse of the dystrophin-associated glycoprotein complex, which acts as a key signaling hub in normal muscles [23,24], causes weakening of the actin cytoskeleton–sarcolemma–extracellular matrix axis. This results in micro-rupturing events at the level of the sarcolemmal membrane system and triggers abnormal lateral force transmission, impaired cellular signaling and enhanced levels of calcium-induced proteolysis [25,26]. These pathophysiological changes affect the majority of the skeletal musculature, which undergoes cellular degeneration, partial replacement by fatty tissue, severe fibrotic scarring and chronic inflammation [27,28]. In addition, respiratory deficiencies, late-onset cardiomyopathy and scoliosis, as well as neuronal and metabolic complications, are characteristic features of the complex pathology of X-linked muscular dystrophy [26,29,30].
In contrast to other types of skeletal muscle, as previously reviewed in detail [31,32,33], relatively limited numbers of studies on the normal EOM proteome [34,35,36] or proteome-wide changes in dystrophin-deficient EOMs [37,38] have been carried out. We therefore performed a systematic mass spectrometric analysis of EOM preparations and potential adaptations in the dystrophic mdx-4cv phenotype, as compared to the recently established proteomic changes in the severely affected mdx-4cv diaphragm [39]. Initially, the proteomic profile of wild type EOMs was determined with the help of an Orbitrap Fusion Tribrid mass spectrometer, which identified unusual expression levels of contractile proteins, especially isoforms of myosin heavy chain. Subsequently, comparative proteomics was used to identify changes in the protein expression profile between unaffected EOMs and dystrophin-lacking EOMs. The mass spectrometric characterization of mdx-4cv EOMs showed increases in a variety of proteins, including glycolytic enzymes and molecular chaperones.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

For the mass spectrometric analysis of extraocular muscle preparations, analytical grade reagents and general materials were obtained from Sigma Chemical Company (Dorset, UK), GE Healthcare (Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, UK) and Bio-Rad Laboratories (Hemel-Hempstead, Hertfordshire, UK). MS-grade trypsin protease was obtained from ThermoFisher Scientific (Dublin, Ireland), as was the Pierce 660 nm Protein Assay Reagent. Spin filters of the type Vivacon 500 (VN0H22; 30,000 MWCO) were purchased from Sartorius (Göttingen, Germany) for carrying out filter-aided sample preparations. Gel electrophoretic separation and immunoblotting was performed with precast Invitrogen Bolt 4–12% Bis-Tris gels and Whatman nitrocellulose transfer membranes from Bio-Science Ltd. (Dun Laoghaire, Ireland), respectively. InstantBlue Coomassie Protein Stain was obtained from Expedeon (Heidelberg, Germany). For immunoblot analysis and immunofluorescence microscopy, primary antibodies were obtained from R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA (MAB5718 against glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase), ProteinTech, Rosemont, IL, USA (20716-1-AP against myosin heavy chain 14) and Abcam, Cambridge, UK (ab2413 against fibronectin). Secondary peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse IgG and anti-rabbit IgG were purchased from Sigma Chemical Company (Dorset, UK) and Cell Signalling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA), respectively.

2.2. Extraocular Muscle Specimens

The harvesting of post mortem EOMs and diaphragm muscle specimens from 12-month-old wild type mice and the mdx-4cv mouse model of dystrophinopathy, which lacked the dystrophin isoforms Dp140, Dp260 and Dp427 due to a point mutation in exon 53, was carried out according to institutional regulations. Animals were handled in strict adherence to local governmental and institutional animal care regulations and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Amt für Umwelt, Verbraucherschutz und Lokale Agenda der Stadt Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany). Frozen specimens were transported on dry ice to Maynooth University in accordance with the regulations of the Department of Agriculture (animal by-product register number 2016/16 to the Department of Biology, National University of Ireland, Maynooth). The eyeball and its surrounding tissues were carefully removed from the ocular cavity by bulbar exenteration. The EOM cone excluding the retractor bulbi muscle was then dissected out and extracted for the isolation of the combined EOM proteome. The establishment of multi-consensus files was carried out with muscle samples from 6 wild type and 6 dystrophic mice. Comparative proteomics was performed with specimens from 3 wild type versus 3 dystrophic mice. Verification analyses were carried out with samples derived from a minimum of 4 wild type and 4 dystrophic mice. Comparative tissue proteomics was carried out by standardized procedures, as previously described in detail [40,41]. Mice were sacrificed in the Bioresource Unit of the University of Bonn and muscle specimens were quick-frozen in liquid nitrogen and then transported on dry ice to Maynooth University [42]. Samples were stored at −80 °C prior to proteomic analysis. Muscle samples were homogenised in lysis buffer (4% SDS, 100 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.6, 0.1 M dithiothreitol) using a handheld homogeniser from Kimble Chase (Rockwood, TN, USA), briefly treated in a sonicating water bath, and then heated for 3 min at 95 °C. Suspensions were centrifuged at 16,000× g for 5 min and the protein-containing supernatant extracted for subsequent analysis [43]. The Pierce 660 nm Protein Assay system was used to determine protein concentration [44]. EOM extracts were further processed for mass spectrometric analysis. Samples were mixed with 200 µL of 8 M urea, 0.1 M Tris pH 8.9 in filter units and centrifuged at 14,000× g for 15 min. For filter-aided sample preparation, processing was carried out according to the standardized FASP protocol [45].

2.3. Label-Free Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry and Proteomic Data Analysis

The label-free liquid chromatography mass spectrometric analysis of EOMs from wild type versus mdx-4cv mice was carried out using a Thermo Orbitrap Fusion Tribrid mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Details of the proteomic workflow describing all preparative steps and analytical procedures using data-dependent acquisition, as well as bioinformatic data handling, were recently outlined in detail [41]. A Thermo UltiMate 3000 nano system was used for reverse-phased capillary high-pressure liquid chromatography and directly coupled in-line with the Thermo Orbitrap Fusion Tribrid mass spectrometer. The qualitative data analysis of mass spectrometric files was carried out with the help of the UniProtKB-SwissProt Mus musculus database with Proteome Discoverer 2.2 using Sequest HT (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and Percolator. For protein identification, the following crucial search parameters were employed: (i) a value of 0.02 Da for MS/MS mass tolerance, (ii) a value of 10 ppm for peptide mass tolerance, (iii) variable modification settings for methionine oxidation, (iv) fixed modification settings in relation to carbamido-methylation and (v) tolerance for the occurrence of up to two missed cleavages. Peptide probability was set to high confidence. A minimum XCorr score of 1.5 for 1, 2.0 for 2, 2.25 for 3 and 2.5 for 4 charge state was employed for the filtering of peptides [40]. The software analysis programme Progenesis QI for Proteomics (version 2.0; Nonlinear Dynamics, a Waters company, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK) was used to carry out quantitative label-free data analysis. Proteome Discoverer 2.2 using Sequest HT (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and a percolator were employed for the identification of peptides and proteins. Datasets were imported into Progenesis QI software for further analysis. Following the review of protein identifications, only those data that agreed with a crucial set of criteria were deemed as differentially expressed species between experimental groups based on statistical significance and high confidence. The criteria included an ANOVA p-value of ≤0.01 between experimental groups, and proteins with ≥2 unique peptides contributing to the identification. The Progenesis QI programme calculated the mean abundance for individual protein species in each experimental condition to determine the maximum fold change for particular proteins. Condition-vs-condition matrixes with mean values were then used to determine the maximum fold change between any two condition’s mean protein abundances [41]. The raw MS files generated by this proteomic study were deposited under the unique identifier ‘j4867’ to the Open Science Foundation (https://osf.io/j4867/ (accessed on 15 June 2021)). The standard bioinformatic analysis tools PANTHER [46] and STRING [47] were utilized for the identification of protein classes and for the characterisation of potential protein interaction patterns, respectively.

2.4. Comparative Immunoblot Analysis

For the independent evaluation of the differential expression levels of myosin isoform MyHC14 in wild type EOM versus wild type diaphragm, as identified by mass spectrometry, comparative immunoblotting was carried out under standard conditions [48]. Labelling of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase and fibronectin were used to evaluate concentration levels in mdx-4cv EOM as compared to wild type EOM preparations. EOM and diaphragm samples were prepared in Laemmli-type sample buffer and heated for 30 min at 37 °C. For gel electrophoresis and immunoblotting analysis, 20µg protein per lane were ran on Invitrogen Bolt 4–12% Bis-Tris gels. Coomassie staining of protein gels was performed with InstantBlue Coomassie Protein Stain [39]. For immunoblotting, gel electrophoretically separated proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, blocked in fat-free milk solution, and incubated in 1:1000 diluted primary antibody overnight. The subsequent detection with 1:1000 diluted peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies was carried out using the enhanced chemiluminescence method [40]. Statistical analysis of immunoblots was carried out using ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA), along with Microsoft Excel, in which statistical significance was based on a p-value  ≤  0.05.

2.5. Immunofluorescence Microscopy

In order to evaluate the expression of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase in wild type versus mdx-4cv EOM muscle, immunofluorescence microscopy was carried out by standardized methodology in combination with histological staining [49]. Freshly dissected skeletal muscle specimens from mice were quick-frozen in liquid nitrogen-cooled isopentane and 10 μm sections were cut in a cryostat [50]. Tissue sections were fixed in a 1:1 (v/v) mixture of methanol and acetone for 10 min at room temperature and then blocked with 1:20 diluted normal goat serum for 30 min at room temperature. Primary antibodies to myosin heavy chain MyHC14 and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase were diluted 1:200 and 1:400, respectively, in carrageenan-containing and phosphate-buffered saline for overnight incubation at 4 °C. The buffer was made by mixing 100 mL phosphate-buffered saline with 0.7 g carrageenan and 10 mg sodium azide. Tissue specimens were carefully washed and then incubated with fluorescently labelled secondary antibodies, using 1:500 diluted anti-mouse RRX antibody for 45 min at room temperature [40]. Nuclei were counter-stained with 1 μg/mL bis-benzimide Hoechst 33,342. Antibody-labelled EOM sections were embedded in Fluoromount G medium and viewed under a Zeiss Axioskop 2 epifluorescence microscope equipped with a digital Zeiss AxioCam HRc camera (Carl Zeiss Jena GmbH, Jena, Germany).

3. Results and Discussion

In order to elucidate the unique cell biological and biochemical status of EOMs among other types of skeletal muscles [2], this study has focused on the refined proteomic analysis of this subtype of contractile tissue using an Orbitrap Fusion Tribrid mass spectrometer. Based on the mass spectrometric identification of the accessible EOM proteome, comparative analysis of wild type versus dystrophic mdx-4cv muscle preparations was carried out to investigate the underlying protein expression profile of the relatively mild phenotype of dystrophin-deficient EOMs in dystrophinopathy [19].

3.1. The Proteomic Profile of Extraocular Muscle

The analytical workflow used in this study is outlined in Figure 1. The mass spectrometry-based proteomic profiling of crude extracts from the EOM cone resulted in the identification of a large number of both muscle-specific marker proteins and core proteins of the sarcomere-associated contractile apparatus [51].
The multi-consensus file of unequivocally identified proteoforms was submitted to a public data repository (Open Science Foundation, OSF Facility, Frankfurt, Germany), under the unique identifier ‘j4867’ (https://osf.io/j4867/ (accessed on 15 June 2021)). The proteomic analysis presented in this report identified 2521 protein species in wild type EOM samples and 2331 protein species in mdx-4cv EOM samples. Table 1 lists the proteomic identification of sarcomeric proteins and related isoforms in EOM preparations from wild type mice. General marker proteins that exhibit the highest level of enriched expression in skeletal muscles according to the Human Protein Atlas [52] were identified as myosin heavy chain MyHC-IIa (MYH2), myosin-binding protein C (MYBPC1), the Z-disk component myotilin (MYOT), the M-band associated enzyme beta-enolase (ENO3), the half-sarcomere spanning giant protein titin (TTN), the actin-binding protein nebulin (NEB) of the thin filament and the skeletal muscle LIM-protein 1 (FHL1) (Table 1). Additional muscle-associated markers included the fast sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase SERCA1 (Q8R429; Atp2a1 gene; 27.5% coverage; 19 unique peptides; 109.4 kDa), the slow sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase SERCA2 (O55143; Atp2a2 gene; 16.4% coverage; 12 unique peptides; 114.8 kDa), the muscle-type glycolytic enzyme phosphofructokinase (P47857; Pfkm gene; 3.9% coverage; 2 unique peptides; 85.2 kDa) and the muscle-specific oxygen transporter myoglobin (P04247; Mb gene; 28.6% coverage; 5 unique peptides; 17.1 kDa) [39,53,54].

3.2. Proteomic Profile of the Sarcomere from Extraocular Muscle

An extensive list of sarcomeric proteins found in wild type EOM is listed in Table 1, including proteins of the thick myosin filament, the thin actin filament, the Z-disk, the M-band region, the titin filament and the auxiliary nebulin filament [55,56], as well as components of the sarcomere-attached cytoskeletal network [57]. The general arrangement of these components in the sarcomere is diagrammatically shown in Figure 2a. In total, this study established 15 different myosin heavy chains [17] to be associated with EOMs. This included the sarcomeric forms myosin-1 (MyHC-IId, muscle), myosin-2 (MyHC-IIa, muscle), myosin-3 (MyHC-embryonic), myosin-4 (MyHC-IIb, muscle), myosin-7 (MHyC-I, slow) and myosin-8 (MyHC-perinatal), as well as the specialized myosins named myosin-13, myosin-14, and myosin-15 [58,59].
The crucial myosin-binding protein present in EOMs was determined to be the slow-type MYBP-C1. The identified cytoskeletal myosins included the MyHC-cellular types A (myosin-9) and B (myosin-10). Besides smooth muscle myosin-11 heavy chain, 4 unconventional myosins were also identified by mass spectrometry, i.e., myosin-6 (E9Q175, Myo6, 144.7 kDa), myosin VC (E9Q1F5, Myo5c, 202.6 kDa), myosin XVIIIa (K3W4L0, Myo18a, 230.8 kDa) and myosin XVIIIb (E9PV66, Myo18b, 288.7 kDa). Myosin light chains included the muscle-specific isoforms MLC-1/3, MLC-2, and MLC-3 [36,60].
Life 11 00595 g002 550
Figure 2. Comparative display of mass spectrometrically identified proteins of the sarcomere in extraocular muscle versus diaphragm from wild type mice. (a) Diagram of the main components of the contractile apparatus. (b) Venn diagram with the proteomic profile of the two types of investigated skeletal muscles.
Figure 2. Comparative display of mass spectrometrically identified proteins of the sarcomere in extraocular muscle versus diaphragm from wild type mice. (a) Diagram of the main components of the contractile apparatus. (b) Venn diagram with the proteomic profile of the two types of investigated skeletal muscles.
Life 11 00595 g002
Mass spectrometric analysis established major proteins of the thin filament in EOMs, including alpha-actin (ACTC1), nebulin, the tropomyosins TPM1 (alpha-1), TPM2 (beta), TPM3 (alpha-3) and TPM4 (alpha-4), and the troponin subunits TnC (TNNC2), TnI (TNNI2) and TnT (TNNT3) [59]. In agreement with a previous study [34], a large number of Z-disk-associated proteins were identified in EOMs, including the alpha-actinins ACTN1, ACTN2, ACTN3 and ACTN4, desmin, vimentin, plectin, alphaB-crystallin, LIM domain-binding protein LDB3, myotilin, nesprin-1 and xin actin-binding repeat-containing protein 1, as well as muscle-specific filamin-C [61]. Established markers of the M-band region in EOMs included muscle-type creatine kinase, myomesin-1, myomesin-3, adenylate kinase AK1, skeletal muscle LIM-protein FHL1 and muscle-specific beta-enolase [62].

3.3. Mass Spectrometric Identification of Proteins Specifically Expressed in Extraocular Muscle

In order to determine enriched expression levels of specific sarcomere-associated proteins in EOMs, the proteomic analysis of extracts from the wild type EOM cone was compared to the recently established proteome of wild type diaphragm muscle [39]. Figure 2b shows a Venn diagram of EOM versus diaphragm and illustrates the large cohort of overlapping expression of proteins belonging to the thick filament, the thin filament, the Z-disk, the M-band, auxiliary filaments and the sarcomere-associated cytoskeletal network [55,56,57]. Interestingly, elevated protein levels in EOMs included the myosin heavy chain isoforms myosin-2 (fast MyHC-IIa; MYH2) [51], myosin-13 (MyHC13; MYH13) [63], myosin-14 (MyHC14; MYH14) [58,59] and myosin-15 (MyHC15; MYH15) [58,59], as well as myosin light polypeptide 6 (MYL6; MLC-3 isoform) [60] and slow cardiac alpha-actin-1 (ACTC1) [64]. In contrast, diaphragm muscle contained apparently higher concentrations of myosin light chains MLC-2 (MYL2) and MLC-3 (MYL3), muscle alpha-actin-1 (ACTA1), the troponin isoforms TNNI1, TNNC1 and TNNT1 and myosin-binding protein MYBP-H [36,39]. These findings confirm that MyHC13 (myosin-13) represents an excellent marker of EOMs [17,34], and additionally establishes the two ancient myosins MyHC14 (myosin-14) and MyHC15 (myosin-15) as highly enriched components of this type of skeletal muscle [58,59]. Immunoblotting confirmed the differential expression pattern of myosin MyHC14 in wild type EOM versus diaphragm muscle. In contrast to comparable concentration levels of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, the immunoblot analysis of MyHC14 demonstrated a significant elevation of this myosin isoform in EOMs as compared to diaphragm muscle (Figure 3).
The EOM-specific expression and distribution of specialized types of myosin heavy chains, such as MyHC13, MyHC14 and MyHC15 [17], which surround the globe structure within the ocular cavity, could be related to the unusual physiological properties of this type of muscle. In addition, the broad isoform expression pattern in EOMs including both slow and fast myosin isoforms, i.e., slow MyHC-I, fast MyHC-IIa, fast MyHC-IIb and fast MyHC-IId, as well as embryonic MyHC3 and perinatal MyHC8, form probably the functional basis for an extremely wide range of possible eye movements. This allows complex movements of the eyeball in relation to its horizontal and vertical axis ranging from slow vergence to rapid saccades [6]. EOMs are capable of both considerable eccentric contraction patterns and fibre twitching at high frequency without tetanus, and this is at least partially provided by the kinetic properties of the unique combination of myosins and their distribution in EOMs. For example, the embryonic MyHC3 isoform is located at the terminal region of contractile fibres, while the super-fast MyHC13 isoform is positioned at the central endplate [63].

3.4. Comparative Proteomic Profiling of Extraocular Muscle from the Dystrophic mdx-4cv Model of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

Dystrophinopathy is the most frequently inherited neuromuscular disease of early childhood and is characterized by progressive skeletal muscle degeneration [21,26], in combination with reactive myofibrosis [28] and sterile inflammation [40]. Genetic rearrangements in the DMD gene cause the almost complete loss of the full-length dystrophin isoform Dp427-M [21] and the simultaneous disintegration of the dystrophin-glycoprotein complex [22]. Established genetic animal models of dystrophinopathy, such as the mdx-4cv mouse [65,66,67], reflect many of the multifaceted and body-wide alterations seen in Duchenne patients, including necrosis, fibrosis and inflammation in the diaphragm muscle [39,68], cardiomyopathic changes [69] and neuronal deficiencies [70], as well as secondary abnormalities in the liver [71], kidney [48], and spleen [40]. The molecular and cellular pathogenesis of muscular dystrophy is also mirrored by characteristic protein changes in biofluids, such as mdx-4cv serum, urine and saliva [72,73,74]. Building on the well-established muscle degeneration and accompanying effects on multiple other organ systems in the mdx-4cv mouse model, it was of interest to determine the pathobiochemical signature of apparently spared EOMs [75].
Detailed histological, cell biological and biochemical studies of dystrophin-deficient EOM have been carried out [76,77,78,79,80,81] and are supplemented here with findings on proteome-wide changes. Table 2 lists significantly altered proteins in mdx-4cv EOM. This includes characteristic increases in the glycolytic enzymes glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, enolase, and lactate dehydrogenase [82], as well as the molecular chaperones heat shock protein 1 beta (HspB1) and heat shock cognate 71 kDa protein (HspA8) [83]. The findings from previous immunoblotting and mass spectrometric surveys of EOMs that were extracted from the spontaneously mutated mdx-23 mouse model of dystrophinopathy agree with these changes in distinct protein families [37,38]. In contrast to comparable expression levels of the dystrophin-associated glycoprotein beta-dystroglycan, higher levels of the molecular chaperones alphaB-crystallin, cvHsp/HspB7, Hsp25/HspB1 and Hsp90 were previously demonstrated to exist in dystrophin-deficient EOMs. The apparent up-regulation of heat shock proteins in both mdx and mdx-4cv EOMs is an indication of a robust cellular stress response in dystrophin-deficient EOMs [84]. Changes in HspB1 might be suitable to establish this small heat shock protein as a marker of the stress response in EOMs in the dystrophic phenotype [37].
The relatively mild phenotype of EOMs in X-linked muscular dystrophy [19,20] is probably closely related to the special biochemical and physiological features of the muscles surrounding the eyeball, such as the longitudinal distribution of neuromuscular junctions [9,10,11], the considerable capacity for fibre regeneration [13,14], exceptional fatigue resistance even in fast-twitching fibre populations [16], and an extensive calcium extrusion system [15]. In most skeletal muscles, dystrophin deficiency causes a collapse of sarcolemmal integrity and a concomitant increase in micro-rupturing of the surface membrane, which triggers influx of Ca2+-ions into myofibres and associated enhanced Ca2+-dependent proteolytic activity in the sarcosol [25,27]. The efficient and swift removal of cytosolic calcium from EOM fibres and the enhanced ion buffering capacity of EOMs might therefore play a key role in the protection from dystrophic changes [18,76,79]. Another important factor might be the relatively low concentration of dystrophin isoform Dp427-M in EOMs. The sub-sarcolemmal dystrophin lattice might not play the same crucial role in the membrane cytoskeleton and linkage of the intracellular actin filaments to extracellular laminin via the dystrophin-glycoprotein complex in EOMs as compared to other skeletal muscles [36]. Importantly, previous studies established an up-regulation of the autosomal dystrophin homologue named utrophin Up-395 and associated rescue of sarcolemmal glycoproteins such as beta-dystroglycan in dystrophin-deficient EOMs [37,77,78]. Thus, full-length utrophin might substitute for dystrophin in EOMs and thereby stabilize its trans-sarcolemmal cytolinker function and prevent secondary damage to myofibres.
Table
Table 2. Comparative proteomic analysis of the mdx-4cv extraocular muscle cone.
Table 2. Comparative proteomic analysis of the mdx-4cv extraocular muscle cone.
AccessionProteinGenePeptidesAnnova
(p)		Fold
Change
P16858Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenaseGAPDH140.01427+18.45
P14602Heat shock protein 1, betaHSPB1250.04444+15.62
P63017Heat shock cognate 71 kDa proteinHSPA8240.00894+10.22
G3XA25Acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase 2ACAT2240.04001+7.56
P06151Lactate dehydrogenase 1, A chainLDHA140.02856+5.93
P19536Hydroxyacyl-coenzyme A dehydrogenaseHADH220.04369+3.38
P17182Alpha-enolaseENO1190.04825+3.13
P47740Aldehyde dehydrogenase family 3 member A2ALDH3A2150.04301+2.94
E9QNH7Acyl-CoA-binding
domain-containing
protein 5		ACBD560.03134+2.43
P07724AlbuminALB450.03520+1.76
P19096Fatty acid synthaseFASN1190.02425+1.69
G5E8R1Tropomyosin alpha-1 chainTPM1110.03985−1.98
Q9DB20ATP synthase subunit O, mitochondrialATP5PO70.03449−2.07
P37040NADPH-cytochrome P450 reductasePOR120.04813−2.45
Q9R0P5DestrinDSTN90.03484−2.66
Q9D3D9ATP synthase subunit delta, mitochondrialATP5F1D40.04228−2.71
Q9CRB9MICOS complex
subunit Mic19		CHCHD3110.04353−2.90
Q9DBC7cAMP-dependent protein kinase type I-alphaPRKAR1A20.02217−2.91
The bioinformatic analysis of the proteomic survey of mdx-4cv EOMs is summarized in Figure 4, which displays the PANTHER analysis of the overall protein profile [46], the heat map of proteomic changes and the findings from the STRING analysis of potentially altered protein interaction hubs [47]. The overall distribution of protein families was shown not to be majorly different between wild type and dystrophic mdx-4cv EOM and agrees with previous mass spectrometric surveys [37,38]. The heat map illustrates the distribution pattern of changes between normal and dystrophic specimens. In contrast to other sub-types of dystrophin-deficient skeletal muscles [31,39,42,84,85,86,87], Dp427-lacking EOMs seem to exhibit relatively minor proteome-wide changes.
The STRING interaction network indicates that the drastically increased enzyme glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase is positioned centrally within an altered protein hub in dystrophic EOMs. Immunofluorescence microscopy and immunoblotting was employed to compare the expression of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase. As illustrated in Figure 5, immunofluorescence labelling of this glycolytic enzyme shows elevated levels in dystrophin-deficient EOMs, as compared to relatively comparable levels of myosin MyHC14. Immunoblotting also indicates increased levels of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase in mdx-4cv EOMs, as compared to comparable expression of fibronectin. An approximately 2-fold increase in the expression of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase has previously been identified in dystrophic mdx-23 diaphragm preparations [84]. Thus, a potential shift to more glycolytic metabolism appears to be associated with the dystrophic phenotype, and this seems to be especially striking in mdx-4cv EOMs, suggesting these types of metabolic enzymes as biomarker candidates for studying dystrophinopathy-related changes in bioenergetic pathways. The comparable levels of fibronectin in wild type versus dystrophin-deficient EOMs indicates the lack of reactive myofibrosis in this type of muscle, which is otherwise seen in most contractile tissues affected in the dystrophic phenotype [28,33,68].
In addition, elevated expression levels were shown for cytosolic acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase ACAT2, aldehyde dehydrogenase family 3 member A2 and acyl-CoA-binding domain-containing protein 5, albumin, hydroxyacyl-coenzyme A dehydrogenase and fatty acid synthase. The proteomic changes in key enzymes of the glycolytic pathway and anaerobic metabolism suggest a potential metabolic shift in mdx-4cv EOMs [88]. A concomitant decrease was observed in certain mitochondrial proteins including the ATP synthase subunit O, NADPH-cytochrome P450 reductase, ATP synthase subunit delta and MICOS complex subunit Mic19. Decreased proteins also included Tropomyosin alpha-1 chain, the actin-depolymerizing protein destrin and cAMP-dependent protein kinase type I-alpha.
A potential weakness and bioanalytical limitations of this report relate to the usage of an animal model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy instead of patient samples, and the focus on changed protein concentration using peptide mass spectrometry. With the exception of the diaphragm, the mdx-4cv mouse exhibits relatively mild symptoms of fibre wasting in its general musculature. Thus, the findings from this study should ideally be extended to characterize muscle specimens from Duchenne patients, which is, however, extremely difficult in the case of EOMs. Proteomics focuses on the mass spectrometric identification of individual proteoforms and can be routinely employed for comparative studies. However, it is important to realize that the establishment of abundance changes in individual proteins does not provide detailed information on the underlying regulatory mechanisms. It will therefore be important to supplement the new proteomic datasets with future analyses of the biochemical, physiological and cell biological properties of dystrophin-deficient EOMs.

4. Conclusions

The systematic mass spectrometry-based proteomic survey of EOM specimens established distinct myosin isoforms of the MyHC category as new sarcomeric marker candidates of this specialized type of skeletal muscle, i.e., MyHC14 and MyHC15, besides confirming MyHC13 as an EOM enriched component. The drastically elevated levels of MyHC14 in wild type EOMs as compared to wild type diaphragm muscle were clearly confirmed by immunoblotting. This makes MyHC14 a suitable biomarker of EOMs and it remains to be elucidated what exact physiological role this particular proteoform of the myosin complex plays in the contractile kinetics and functional adaptability of EOMs. Comparative proteomics of wild type versus dystrophic specimens indicates that an apparent metabolic shift from oxidative metabolism to a more glycolytic pathway and heightened cellular stress response exists in mdx-4cv EOM. Elevated levels of the glycolytic enzyme glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase appear to be associated with dystrophic alterations in mildly affected EOMs. These alterations in the cellular homeostasis may serve as mechanisms to compensate for deficits induced by the dystrophin loss in this model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.S., P.D. and K.O.; methodology, S.G. and P.D.; software, M.H. and P.M.; validation, S.G., P.D. and M.Z.; formal analysis, S.G., P.D., M.Z. and M.H.; resources, J.R.; data curation, P.D., S.G. and M.H.; writing—original draft preparation, S.G., P.D. and K.O.; writing—review and editing, K.O., D.S., S.G. and P.D.; supervision, K.O., P.D., J.R. and P.M.; funding acquisition, K.O. and P.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Research was supported by the Kathleen Lonsdale Institute for Human Health Research at Maynooth University. The Orbitrap Fusion Tribrid mass spectrometer was funded under a Science Foundation Ireland Infrastructure Award to Dublin City University (SFI 16/RI/3701).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Animals were handled in strict adherence to local governmental and institutional animal care regulations and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Amt für Umwelt, Verbraucherschutz und Lokale Agenda der Stadt Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany). Frozen specimens were transported on dry ice to Maynooth University in accordance with the Department of Agriculture (animal by-product register number 2016/16 to the Department of Biology, National University of Ireland, Maynooth).

Data Availability Statement

The raw MS files generated by this proteomic study have been deposited under the unique identifier ‘j4867’ to the Open Science Foundation (https://osf.io/j4867/).

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Hemmen Sabir and Stephan Baader (University of Bonn) for their support of this project.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Blaauw, B.; Schiaffino, S.; Reggiani, C. Mechanisms modulating skeletal muscle phenotype. Compr. Physiol. 2013, 3, 1645–1687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Verma, M.; Fitzpatrick, K.; McLoon, L.K. Extraocular Muscle Repair and Regeneration. Curr. Ophthalmol. Rep. 2017, 5, 207–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Haladaj, R.; Polguj, M.; Tubbs, R.S. Comparison of the Superior and Inferior Rectus Muscles in Humans: An Anatomical Study with Notes on Morphology, Anatomical Variations, and Intramuscular Innervation Patterns. BioMed Res. Int. 2020, 2020, 9037693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Spencer, R.F.; Porter, J.D. Biological organization of the extraocular muscles. Prog. Brain Res. 2006, 151, 43–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. van der Pol, C.B.; Chakraborty, S.; Gao, J.; Nguyen, T.; Torres, C.; Glikstein, R. Imaging anatomy and pathology of extraocular muscles in adults. Can. Assoc. Radiol. J. 2014, 65, 366–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Büttner-Ennever, J.A. Anatomy of the oculomotor system. Dev. Ophthalmol. 2007, 40, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Sambasivan, R.; Gayraud-Morel, B.; Dumas, G.; Cimper, C.; Paisant, S.; Kelly, R.G.; Tajbakhsh, S. Distinct regulatory cascades govern extraocular and pharyngeal arch muscle progenitor cell fates. Dev. Cell. 2009, 16, 810–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Zacharias, A.L.; Lewandoski, M.; Rudnicki, M.A.; Gage, P.J. Pitx2 is an upstream activator of extraocular myogenesis and survival. Dev. Biol. 2011, 349, 395–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Jacoby, J.; Chiarandini, D.J.; Stefani, E. Electrical properties and innervation of fibers in the orbital layer of rat extraocular muscles. J. Neurophysiol. 1989, 61, 116–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hernández, R.G.; Calvo, P.M.; Blumer, R.; de la Cruz, R.R.; Pastor, A.M. Functional diversity of motoneurons in the oculomotor system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 3837–3846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Liu, J.X.; Domellöf, F.P. A Novel Type of Multiterminal Motor Endplate in Human Extraocular Muscles. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2018, 59, 539–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Bruenech, J.R.; Kjellevold Haugen, I.B. How does the structure of extraocular muscles and their nerves affect their function? Eye (Lond.) 2015, 29, 177–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. McLoon, L.K.; Rowe, J.; Wirtschafter, J.; McCormick, K.M. Continuous myofiber remodeling in uninjured extraocular myofibers: Myonuclear turnover and evidence for apoptosis. Muscle Nerve 2004, 29, 707–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Hebert, S.L.; Daniel, M.L.; McLoon, L.K. The role of Pitx2 in maintaining the phenotype of myogenic precursor cells in the extraocular muscles. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e58405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sekulic-Jablanovic, M.; Ullrich, N.D.; Goldblum, D.; Palmowski-Wolfe, A.; Zorzato, F.; Treves, S. Functional characterization of orbicularis oculi and extraocular muscles. J. Gen. Physiol. 2016, 147, 395–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Asmussen, G.; Punkt, K.; Bartsch, B.; Soukup, T. Specific metabolic properties of rat oculorotatory extraocular muscles can be linked to their low force requirements. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2008, 49, 4865–4871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Hoh, J.F.Y. Myosin heavy chains in extraocular muscle fibres: Distribution, regulation and function. Acta Physiol. (Oxf.) 2021, 231, e13535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Khurana, T.S.; Prendergast, R.A.; Alameddine, H.S.; Tome, F.M.; Fardeau, M.; Arahata, K.; Sugita, H.; Kunkel, L.M. Absence of extraocular muscle pathology in Duchenne’s muscular dystrophy: Role for calcium homeostasis in extraocular muscle sparing. J. Exp. Med. 1995, 182, 467–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Andrade, F.H.; Porter, J.D.; Kaminski, H.J. Eye muscle sparing by the muscular dystrophies: Lessons to be learned? Microsc. Res. Tech. 2000, 48, 192–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kallestad, K.M.; Hebert, S.L.; McDonald, A.A.; Daniel, M.L.; Cu, S.R.; McLoon, L.K. Sparing of extraocular muscle in aging and muscular dystrophies: A myogenic precursor cell hypothesis. Exp. Cell Res. 2011, 317, 873–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Thompson, R.; Spendiff, S.; Roos, A.; Bourque, P.R.; Warman Chardon, J.; Kirschner, J.; Horvath, R.; Lochmüller, H. Advances in the diagnosis of inherited neuromuscular diseases and implications for therapy development. Lancet Neurol. 2020, 19, 522–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Murphy, S.; Ohlendieck, K. The biochemical and mass spectrometric profiling of the dystrophin complexome from skeletal muscle. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2015, 14, 20–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Dowling, P.; Gargan, S.; Murphy, S.; Zweyer, M.; Sabir, H.; Swandulla, D.; Ohlendieck, K. The Dystrophin Node as Integrator of Cytoskeletal Organization, Lateral Force Transmission, Fiber Stability and Cellular Signaling in Skeletal Muscle. Proteomes 2021, 9, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Allen, D.G.; Whitehead, N.P.; Froehner, S.C. Absence of Dystrophin Disrupts Skeletal Muscle Signaling: Roles of Ca2+, Reactive Oxygen Species, and Nitric Oxide in the Development of Muscular Dystrophy. Physiol. Rev. 2016, 96, 253–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Shin, J.; Tajrishi, M.M.; Ogura, Y.; Kumar, A. Wasting mechanisms in muscular dystrophy. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2013, 45, 2266–2279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Mercuri, E.; Bönnemann, C.G.; Muntoni, F. Muscular dystrophies. Lancet 2019, 394, 2025–2038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Starosta, A.; Konieczny, P. Therapeutic aspects of cell signaling and communication in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2021, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ohlendieck, K.; Swandulla, D. Molecular pathogenesis of Duchenne muscular dystrophy-related fibrosis. Pathologe 2017, 38, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Birnkrant, D.J.; Bushby, K.; Bann, C.M.; Apkon, S.D.; Blackwell, A.; Brumbaugh, D.; Case, L.E.; Clemens, P.R.; Hadjiyannakis, S.; Pandya, S.; et al. Diagnosis and management of Duchenne muscular dystrophy, part 1: Diagnosis, and neuromuscular, rehabilitation, endocrine, and gastrointestinal and nutritional management. Lancet Neurol. 2018, 17, 251–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Meyers, T.A.; Townsend, D. Cardiac Pathophysiology and the Future of Cardiac Therapies in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Carr, S.J.; Zahedi, R.P.; Lochmüller, H.; Roos, A. Mass spectrometry-based protein analysis to unravel the tissue pathophysiology in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Proteom. Clin. Appl. 2018, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Dowling, P.; Murphy, S.; Zweyer, M.; Raucamp, M.; Swandulla, D.; Ohlendieck, K. Emerging proteomic biomarkers of X-linked muscular dystrophy. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn. 2019, 19, 739–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Holland, A.; Murphy, S.; Dowling, P.; Ohlendieck, K. Pathoproteomic profiling of the skeletal muscle matrisome in dystrophinopathy associated myofibrosis. Proteomics 2016, 16, 345–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Fraterman, S.; Zeiger, U.; Khurana, T.S.; Wilm, M.; Rubinstein, N.A. Quantitative proteomics profiling of sarcomere associated proteins in limb and extraocular muscle allotypes. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2007, 6, 728–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Fraterman, S.; Zeiger, U.; Khurana, T.S.; Rubinstein, N.A.; Wilm, M. Combination of peptide OFFGEL fractionation and label-free quantitation facilitated proteomics profiling of extraocular muscle. Proteomics 2007, 7, 3404–3416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, S.Z.; Xie, H.Q.; Xu, Y.; Li, X.Q.; Wei, R.Q.; Zhi, W.; Deng, L.; Qiu, L.; Yang, Z.M. Regulation of cell proliferation by fast Myosin light chain 1 in myoblasts derived from extraocular muscle, diaphragm and gastrocnemius. Exp. Biol. Med. (Maywood) 2008, 233, 1374–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lewis, C.; Ohlendieck, K. Proteomic profiling of naturally protected extraocular muscles from the dystrophin-deficient mdx mouse. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2010, 396, 1024–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Matsumura, C.Y.; Menezes de Oliveira, B.; Durbeej, M.; Marques, M.J. Isobaric Tagging-Based Quantification for Proteomic Analysis: A Comparative Study of Spared and Affected Muscles from mdx Mice at the Early Phase of Dystrophy. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e65831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Murphy, S.; Zweyer, M.; Raucamp, M.; Henry, M.; Meleady, P.; Swandulla, D.; Ohlendieck, K. Proteomic profiling of the mouse diaphragm and refined mass spectrometric analysis of the dystrophic phenotype. J. Muscle Res. Cell. Motil. 2019, 40, 9–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Dowling, P.; Gargan, S.; Zweyer, M.; Henry, M.; Meleady, P.; Swandulla, D.; Ohlendieck, K. Proteome-wide Changes in the mdx-4cv Spleen due to Pathophysiological Cross Talk with Dystrophin-Deficient Skeletal Muscle. iScience 2020, 23, 101500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Dowling, P.; Gargan, S.; Zweyer, M.; Henry, M.; Meleady, P.; Swandulla, D.; Ohlendieck, K. Protocol for the Bottom-Up Proteomic Analysis of Mouse Spleen. STAR Protoc. 2020, 1, 100196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Murphy, S.; Zweyer, M.; Henry, M.; Meleady, P.; Mundegar, R.R.; Swandulla, D.; Ohlendieck, K. Proteomic analysis of the sarcolemma-enriched fraction from dystrophic mdx-4cv skeletal muscle. J. Proteom. 2019, 191, 212–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Dowling, P.; Gargan, S.; Zweyer, M.; Sabir, H.; Henry, M.; Meleady, P.; Swandulla, D.; Ohlendieck, K. Proteomic profiling of the interface between the stomach wall and the pancreas in dystrophinopathy. Eur. J. Transl. Myol. 2021, 31, 9627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Antharavally, B.S.; Mallia, K.A.; Rangaraj, P.; Haney, P.; Bell, P.A. Quantitation of proteins using a dye-metal-based colorimetric protein assay. Anal. Biochem. 2009, 385, 342–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wiśniewski, J.R.; Zougman, A.; Nagaraj, N.; Mann, M. Universal sample preparation method for proteome analysis. Nat. Methods 2009, 6, 359–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Mi, H.; Ebert, D.; Muruganujan, A.; Mills, C.; Albou, L.P.; Mushayamaha, T.; Thomas, P.D. PANTHER version 16: A revised family classification, tree-based classification tool, enhancer regions and extensive API. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, D394–D403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Szklarczyk, D.; Gable, A.L.; Nastou, K.C.; Lyon, D.; Kirsch, R.; Pyysalo, S.; Doncheva, N.T.; Legeay, M.; Fang, T.; Bork, P.; et al. The STRING database in 2021: Customizable protein-protein networks, and functional characterization of user-uploaded gene/measurement sets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, D605–D612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Dowling, P.; Zweyer, M.; Raucamp, M.; Henry, M.; Meleady, P.; Swandulla, D.; Ohlendieck, K. Proteomic and cell biological profiling of the renal phenotype of the mdx-4cv mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 2020, 99, 151059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Murphy, S.; Zweyer, M.; Mundegar, R.R.; Henry, M.; Meleady, P.; Swandulla, D.; Ohlendieck, K. Concurrent Label-Free Mass Spectrometric Analysis of Dystrophin Isoform Dp427 and the Myofibrosis Marker Collagen in Crude Extracts from mdx-4cv Skeletal Muscles. Proteomes 2015, 3, 298–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Stuelsatz, P.; Yablonka-Reuveni, Z. Isolation of Mouse Periocular Tissue for Histological and Immunostaining Analyses of the Extraocular Muscles and Their Satellite Cells. Methods Mol. Biol. 2016, 1460, 101–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Holland, A.; Ohlendieck, K. Proteomic profiling of the contractile apparatus from skeletal muscle. Expert Rev. Proteom. 2013, 10, 239–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Thul, P.J.; Lindskog, C. The human protein atlas: A spatial map of the human proteome. Protein Sci. 2018, 27, 233–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Deshmukh, A.S.; Murgia, M.; Nagaraj, N.; Treebak, J.T.; Cox, J.; Mann, M. Deep proteomics of mouse skeletal muscle enables quantitation of protein isoforms, metabolic pathways, and transcription factors. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2015, 14, 841–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Deshmukh, A.S.; Steenberg, D.E.; Hostrup, M.; Birk, J.B.; Larsen, J.K.; Santos, A.; Kjøbsted, R.; Hingst, J.R.; Schéele, C.C.; Murgia, M.; et al. Deep muscle-proteomic analysis of freeze-dried human muscle biopsies reveals fiber type-specific adaptations to exercise training. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Murphy, S.; Ohlendieck, K. Proteomic profiling of large myofibrillar proteins from dried and long-term stored polyacrylamide gels. Anal. Biochem. 2018, 543, 8–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Dowling, P.; Zweyer, M.; Swandulla, D.; Ohlendieck, K. Characterization of Contractile Proteins from Skeletal Muscle Using Gel-Based Top-Down Proteomics. Proteomes 2019, 7, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Henderson, C.A.; Gomez, C.G.; Novak, S.M.; Mi-Mi, L.; Gregorio, C.C. Overview of the Muscle Cytoskeleton. Compr. Physiol. 2017, 7, 891–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Rossi, A.C.; Mammucari, C.; Argentini, C.; Reggiani, C.; Schiaffino, S. Two novel/ancient myosins in mammalian skeletal muscles: MYH14/7b and MYH15 are expressed in extraocular muscles and muscle spindles. J. Physiol. 2010, 588, 353–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Lee, L.A.; Karabina, A.; Broadwell, L.J.; Leinwand, L.A. The ancient sarcomeric myosins found in specialized muscles. Skelet. Muscle 2019, 9, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Sitbon, Y.H.; Yadav, S.; Kazmierczak, K.; Szczesna-Cordary, D. Insights into myosin regulatory and essential light chains: A focus on their roles in cardiac and skeletal muscle function, development and disease. J. Muscle Res. Cell. Motil. 2020, 41, 313–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Leber, Y.; Ruparelia, A.A.; Kirfel, G.; van der Ven, P.F.; Hoffmann, B.; Merkel, R.; Bryson-Richardson, R.J.; Fürst, D.O. Filamin C is a highly dynamic protein associated with fast repair of myofibrillar microdamage. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2016, 25, 2776–2788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Hu, L.Y.; Ackermann, M.A.; Kontrogianni-Konstantopoulos, A. The sarcomeric M-region: A molecular command center for diverse cellular processes. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 714197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Briggs, M.M.; Schachat, F. The superfast extraocular myosin (MYH13) is localized to the innervation zone in both the global and orbital layers of rabbit extraocular muscle. J. Exp. Biol. 2002, 205, 3133–3142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Squire, J. Special Issue: The Actin-Myosin Interaction in Muscle: Background and Overview. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Banks, G.B.; Combs, A.C.; Chamberlain, J.S. Sequencing protocols to genotype mdx, mdx(4cv), and mdx(5cv) mice. Muscle Nerve 2010, 42, 268–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Bengtsson, N.E.; Hall, J.K.; Odom, G.L.; Phelps, M.P.; Andrus, C.R.; Hawkins, R.D.; Hauschka, S.D.; Chamberlain, J.R.; Chamberlain, J.S. Muscle-specific CRISPR/Cas9 dystrophin gene editing ameliorates pathophysiology in a mouse model for Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 14454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Tichy, E.D.; Mourkioti, F. A new method of genotyping MDX4CV mice by PCR-RFLP analysis. Muscle Nerve 2017, 56, 522–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Holland, A.; Dowling, P.; Meleady, P.; Henry, M.; Zweyer, M.; Mundegar, R.R.; Swandulla, D.; Ohlendieck, K. Label-free mass spectrometric analysis of the mdx-4cv diaphragm identifies the matricellular protein periostin as a potential factor involved in dystrophinopathy-related fibrosis. Proteomics 2015, 15, 2318–2331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Murphy, S.; Dowling, P.; Zweyer, M.; Mundegar, R.R.; Henry, M.; Meleady, P.; Swandulla, D.; Ohlendieck, K. Proteomic analysis of dystrophin deficiency and associated changes in the aged mdx-4cv heart model of dystrophinopathy-related cardiomyopathy. J. Proteom. 2016, 145, 24–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Murphy, S.; Zweyer, M.; Henry, M.; Meleady, P.; Mundegar, R.R.; Swandulla, D.; Ohlendieck, K. Label-free mass spectrometric analysis reveals complex changes in the brain proteome from the mdx-4cv mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Clin. Proteom. 2015, 12, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Murphy, S.; Zweyer, M.; Henry, M.; Meleady, P.; Mundegar, R.R.; Swandulla, D.; Ohlendieck, K. Proteomic profiling of liver tissue from the mdx-4cv mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Clin. Proteom. 2018, 15, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Murphy, S.; Dowling, P.; Zweyer, M.; Henry, M.; Meleady, P.; Mundegar, R.R.; Swandulla, D.; Ohlendieck, K. Proteomic profiling of mdx-4cv serum reveals highly elevated levels of the inflammation-induced plasma marker haptoglobin in muscular dystrophy. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2017, 39, 1357–1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Murphy, S.; Zweyer, M.; Mundegar, R.R.; Swandulla, D.; Ohlendieck, K. Proteomic identification of elevated saliva kallikrein levels in the mdx-4cv mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Biochem. Biophys. Rep. 2018, 18, 100541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Gargan, S.; Dowling, P.; Zweyer, M.; Swandulla, D.; Ohlendieck, K. Identification of marker proteins of muscular dystrophy in the urine proteome from the mdx-4cv model of dystrophinopathy. Mol. Omics 2000, 16, 268–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Formicola, L.; Marazzi, G.; Sassoon, D.A. The extraocular muscle stem cell niche is resistant to ageing and disease. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2014, 6, 328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Zeiger, U.; Mitchell, C.H.; Khurana, T.S. Superior calcium homeostasis of extraocular muscles. Exp. Eye Res. 2010, 91, 613–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Dowling, P.; Culligan, K.; Ohlendieck, K. Distal mdx muscle groups exhibiting up-regulation of utrophin and rescue of dystrophin-associated glycoproteins exemplify a protected phenotype in muscular dystrophy. Naturwissenschaften 2002, 89, 75–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Dowling, P.; Lohan, J.; Ohlendieck, K. Comparative analysis of Dp427-deficient mdx tissues shows that the milder dystrophic phenotype of extraocular and toe muscle fibres is associated with a persistent expression of beta-dystroglycan. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 2003, 82, 222–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Pertille, A.; de Carvalho, C.L.; Matsumura, C.Y.; Neto, H.S.; Marques, M.J. Calcium-binding proteins in skeletal muscles of the mdx mice: Potential role in the pathogenesis of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Int. J. Exp. Pathol. 2010, 91, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. McDonald, A.A.; Kunz, M.D.; McLoon, L.K. Dystrophic changes in extraocular muscles after gamma irradiation in mdx:utrophin(+/−) mice. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e86424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. McDonald, A.A.; Hebert, S.L.; McLoon, L.K. Sparing of the extraocular muscles in mdx mice with absent or reduced utrophin expression: A life span analysis. Neuromuscul. Disord. 2015, 25, 873–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Ohlendieck, K. Proteomics of skeletal muscle glycolysis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2010, 1804, 2089–2101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Brinkmeier, H.; Ohlendieck, K. Chaperoning heat shock proteins: Proteomic analysis and relevance for normal and dystrophin-deficient muscle. Proteom. Clin. Appl. 2014, 8, 875–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Doran, P.; Martin, G.; Dowling, P.; Jockusch, H.; Ohlendieck, K. Proteome analysis of the dystrophin-deficient MDX diaphragm reveals a drastic increase in the heat shock protein cvHSP. Proteomics 2006, 6, 4610–4621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. van Westering, T.L.E.; Johansson, H.J.; Hanson, B.; Coenen-Stass, A.M.L.; Lomonosova, Y.; Tanihata, J.; Motohashi, N.; Yokota, T.; Takeda, S.; Lehtiö, J.; et al. Mutation-independent Proteomic Signatures of Pathological Progression in Murine Models of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2020, 19, 2047–2068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Van Pelt, D.W.; Kharaz, Y.A.; Sarver, D.C.; Eckhardt, L.R.; Dzierzawski, J.T.; Disser, N.P.; Piacentini, A.N.; Comerford, E.; McDonagh, B.; Mendias, C.L. Multiomics analysis of the mdx/mTR mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Connect. Tissue Res. 2021, 62, 24–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Capitanio, D.; Moriggi, M.; Torretta, E.; Barbacini, P.; De Palma, S.; Viganò, A.; Lochmüller, H.; Muntoni, F.; Ferlini, A.; Mora, M.; et al. Comparative proteomic analyses of Duchenne muscular dystrophy and Becker muscular dystrophy muscles: Changes contributing to preserve muscle function in Becker muscular dystrophy patients. J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2020, 11, 547–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Porter, J.D.; Merriam, A.P.; Khanna, S.; Andrade, F.H.; Richmonds, C.R.; Leahy, P.; Cheng, G.; Karathanasis, P.; Zhou, X.; Kusner, L.L.; et al. Constitutive properties, not molecular adaptations, mediate extraocular muscle sparing in dystrophic mdx mice. FASEB J. 2003, 17, 893–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Life 11 00595 g001 550
Figure 1. Overview of the proteomic profiling approach to characterize extraocular muscle (EOM), as well as determine changes in the mdx-4cv mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy.
Figure 1. Overview of the proteomic profiling approach to characterize extraocular muscle (EOM), as well as determine changes in the mdx-4cv mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy.
Life 11 00595 g001
Life 11 00595 g003 550
Figure 3. Immunoblot analysis of extraocular muscle (EOM) versus diaphragm (DIA) muscle from wild type mice. Shown is an InstantBlue Coomassie stained protein gel using sodium dodecyl sulphate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) with molecular weight standards (lane 1; MWS), wild type EOM (lane 2) and wild type DIA (lane 3) samples, as well as identical nitrocellulose replicas used for immunoblotting (IB) and labelled with antibodies to myosin heavy chain MyHC14 and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). In the adjacent panels are shown the statistical analysis of immunoblotting (Mann–Whitney U test; n = 8; ** p < 0.01). The value of molecular mass standards (×10−3 kDa) is marked on the left side of the gel.
Figure 3. Immunoblot analysis of extraocular muscle (EOM) versus diaphragm (DIA) muscle from wild type mice. Shown is an InstantBlue Coomassie stained protein gel using sodium dodecyl sulphate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) with molecular weight standards (lane 1; MWS), wild type EOM (lane 2) and wild type DIA (lane 3) samples, as well as identical nitrocellulose replicas used for immunoblotting (IB) and labelled with antibodies to myosin heavy chain MyHC14 and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). In the adjacent panels are shown the statistical analysis of immunoblotting (Mann–Whitney U test; n = 8; ** p < 0.01). The value of molecular mass standards (×10−3 kDa) is marked on the left side of the gel.
Life 11 00595 g003
Life 11 00595 g004 550
Figure 4. Bioinformatic analysis of the comparative proteomic profiling of extraocular muscle (EOM) from wild type (wt) versus the mdx-4cv model of X-linked muscular dystrophy. Shown is the result of the bioinformatic PANTHER analysis [46] of the distribution of protein classes within the EOM proteome from normal versus dystrophic mice. In addition, the heat map of the comparative proteomic analysis of wt versus mdx-4cv EOM is displayed, which shows the findings from hierarchical clustering of the mean protein expression values of statistically significant differentially abundant EOM proteins. Potential changes in protein–protein interaction patterns in mdx-4cv EOMs were determined with the help of the bioinformatics software programme STRING [47].
Figure 4. Bioinformatic analysis of the comparative proteomic profiling of extraocular muscle (EOM) from wild type (wt) versus the mdx-4cv model of X-linked muscular dystrophy. Shown is the result of the bioinformatic PANTHER analysis [46] of the distribution of protein classes within the EOM proteome from normal versus dystrophic mice. In addition, the heat map of the comparative proteomic analysis of wt versus mdx-4cv EOM is displayed, which shows the findings from hierarchical clustering of the mean protein expression values of statistically significant differentially abundant EOM proteins. Potential changes in protein–protein interaction patterns in mdx-4cv EOMs were determined with the help of the bioinformatics software programme STRING [47].
Life 11 00595 g004
Life 11 00595 g005 550
Figure 5. Histological and immunofluorescence microscopical characterization, as well as immunoblot analysis, of extraocular muscle (EOM) from the mdx-4cv mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Shown are transverse cryosections of wild type (wt) and mdx-4cv EOMs stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and labelled with antibodies to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and myosin heavy chain MyHC14. Bar equals 30 μm. Shown is an InstantBlue Coomassie (CBB) stained protein gel with wild type EOM (lane 1) and mdx-4cv EOM (lane 2) samples, as well as identical nitrocellulose replicas used for immunoblotting and labelled with antibodies to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and fibronectin (FN). In the below panels are shown the statistical analysis of immunoblotting (Mann–Whitney U test; n = 4; * p < 0.05). The value of molecular mass standards (x10−3 kDa) is marked on the left side of the gel.
Figure 5. Histological and immunofluorescence microscopical characterization, as well as immunoblot analysis, of extraocular muscle (EOM) from the mdx-4cv mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Shown are transverse cryosections of wild type (wt) and mdx-4cv EOMs stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and labelled with antibodies to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and myosin heavy chain MyHC14. Bar equals 30 μm. Shown is an InstantBlue Coomassie (CBB) stained protein gel with wild type EOM (lane 1) and mdx-4cv EOM (lane 2) samples, as well as identical nitrocellulose replicas used for immunoblotting and labelled with antibodies to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and fibronectin (FN). In the below panels are shown the statistical analysis of immunoblotting (Mann–Whitney U test; n = 4; * p < 0.05). The value of molecular mass standards (x10−3 kDa) is marked on the left side of the gel.
Life 11 00595 g005
Table
Table 1. Proteomic identification of sarcomere-associated proteins and related isoforms in mouse extraocular muscle.
Table 1. Proteomic identification of sarcomere-associated proteins and related isoforms in mouse extraocular muscle.
AccessionProteinGeneScoreCoverage
%		PeptidesMolecular Mass (kDa)
E9Q8K5Titin, muscle-
specific		TTN171.52.14523713.7
Q5SX40Myosin-1 heavy chain, MyHC-IId, fast muscleMYH1459.631.1063223.2
G3UW82Myosin-2 heavy chain, MyHC-IIa, fast muscleMYH2382.731.1560223.1
P13541Myosin-3 heavy chain, MyHC-embryonic, muscleMYH3125.111.7024223.7
Q5SX39Myosin-4, MyHC-IIb, fast muscleMYH4472.932.7568222.7
Q91Z83Myosin-7 heavy chain, MyHC-I, slow muscleMYH796.0410.7020222.7
P13542Myosin-8 heavy chain, MyHC-perinatal, muscleMYH8277.924.6847222.6
Q8VDD5Myosin-9 heavy chain, MyHC-cellular, type AMYH987.8110.6120226.2
Q61879Myosin-10 heavy chain, MyHC-cellular, type BMYH1020.792.685228.8
A0A2R8VHF9Myosin-11 heavy chain, smooth muscleMYH11255.120.0744223.2
B1AR69Myosin-13 heavy chain, extraocular muscleMYH13217.4117.0331223.4
K3W4R2Myosin-14 heavy chain, MyHC-eom, developmentalMYH1425.403.456228.4
E9Q264Myosin-15 heavy chain, extraocular muscleMYH1510.201.563221.7
P05977Myosin light chain MLC-1/3, muscleMYL174.3645.21820.6
A0A0U1RP93Myosin light chain MLC-2, muscleMYLPF28.0210.07116.9
Q60605Myosin light chain MLC-3, muscleMYL656.9154.30716.9
D3YU50Myosin-binding
protein C, slow		MYBPC120.965.244126.5
A0A571BF46NebulinNEB15.551.328866.5
P68033Actin, alpha,
skeletal muscle		ACTC1382.0566.842642.0
P60710Actin, beta, cytoplasmicACTB384.1152.532541.7
E9Q452Tropomyosin
alpha-1		TPM1119.9240.931432.5
A2AIM4Tropomyosin betaTPM2112.3141.551633.0
D3Z6I8Tropomyosin
alpha-3		TPM347.8943.721228.7
A0A571BEU1Tropomyosin
alpha-4		TPM44.3314.56318.4
P20801Troponin C, muscleTNNC23.9911.88218.1
A0A1B0GRY8Troponin I, fast muscleTNNI223.6613.95220.2
A2A6I8Troponin T, fast muscleTNNT38.6620.08428.3
A1BN54Alpha-actinin-1ACTN136.588.346102.7
Q9JI91Alpha-actinin-2ACTN213.097.836103.8
O88990Alpha-actinin-3ACTN311.305.114103.0
P57780Alpha-actinin-4ACTN465.9220.3914104.9
P31001DesminDES27.8915.99853.5
P20152VimentinVIM72.3724.89853.7
E9Q3W4PlectinPLEC22.893.1712498.8
P23927Alpha-B-crystallinCRYAB14.3636.57720.1
E9PYJ9LIM domain-binding protein 3LDB310.343.98272.3
Q9JIF9MyotilinMYOT10.236.45355.3
A0A1L1STC6Nesprin-1SYNE14.290.3121009.3
A0A571BDS0Xin actin-binding
repeat-containing protein 1		XIRP12.031.052196.6
Q8VHX6Filamin-C,
muscle-specific		FNLC21.042.536290.9
Z4YJF5Myomesin-1MYOM12.090.831175.4
A2ABU4Myomesin-3, slow, extraocular muscleMYOM35.422.082161.7
P07310Creatine kinase, muscle-typeCKM48.9829.921143.0
Q9R0Y5Adenylate kinase, AK1AK117.3016.49221.5
P97447Skeletal muscle LIM-protein 1FHL110.475.89261.8
P21550Beta-enolase,
muscle-specific		ENO3152.3842.631847.0
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gargan, S.; Dowling, P.; Zweyer, M.; Reimann, J.; Henry, M.; Meleady, P.; Swandulla, D.; Ohlendieck, K. Mass Spectrometric Profiling of Extraocular Muscle and Proteomic Adaptations in the mdx-4cv Model of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. Life 2021, 11, 595. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11070595

AMA Style

Gargan S, Dowling P, Zweyer M, Reimann J, Henry M, Meleady P, Swandulla D, Ohlendieck K. Mass Spectrometric Profiling of Extraocular Muscle and Proteomic Adaptations in the mdx-4cv Model of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. Life. 2021; 11(7):595. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11070595

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gargan, Stephen, Paul Dowling, Margit Zweyer, Jens Reimann, Michael Henry, Paula Meleady, Dieter Swandulla, and Kay Ohlendieck. 2021. "Mass Spectrometric Profiling of Extraocular Muscle and Proteomic Adaptations in the mdx-4cv Model of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy" Life 11, no. 7: 595. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11070595

APA Style

Gargan, S., Dowling, P., Zweyer, M., Reimann, J., Henry, M., Meleady, P., Swandulla, D., & Ohlendieck, K. (2021). Mass Spectrometric Profiling of Extraocular Muscle and Proteomic Adaptations in the mdx-4cv Model of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. Life, 11(7), 595. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11070595

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop