Next Article in Journal
New Species Can Broaden Myelin Research: Suitability of Little Skate, Leucoraja erinacea
Next Article in Special Issue
Update on Biomarkers Associated to Cardioembolic Stroke: A Narrative Review
Previous Article in Journal
Where Did Life Begin? Testing Ideas in Prebiotic Analogue Conditions
Previous Article in Special Issue
MiR-10a, 27a, 34b/c, and 300 Polymorphisms are Associated with Ischemic Stroke Susceptibility and Post-Stroke Mortality
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Blood Biomarkers to Predict Long-Term Mortality after Ischemic Stroke

by Laura Ramiro 1, Laura Abraira 2,3, Manuel Quintana 2,3, Paula García-Rodríguez 1, Estevo Santamarina 2,3, Jose Álvarez-Sabín 3,4, Josep Zaragoza 5, María Hernández-Pérez 6, Xavier Ustrell 7, Blanca Lara 8, Mikel Terceño 9, Alejandro Bustamante 1,6,* and Joan Montaner 1,10
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Submission received: 27 January 2021 / Revised: 5 February 2021 / Accepted: 7 February 2021 / Published: 10 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovative Stroke Diagnostic and Treatment Strategies)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This is an interesting study, with clearly described results. Overall it is easy to read and understand.

Author Response

Dear reviewer, thank you for considering our manuscript “Blood biomarkers to predict long term mortality after ischemic stroke” for publication in the special issue Innovative Stroke Diagnostic and Treatment Strategies for Life.

We would like to thank the reviewer for the time and effort to review the manuscript.

As suggested by another reviewer we have sent the manuscript to the English editing service of MDPI (English editing ID: English-26743) to improve the quality of the text.  

Reviewer 2 Report

Laura Ramiro and colleagues showed that the acute upregulation of endostatin, IL-6, and 337 TNF-R1 after ischemic stroke can predict long-term mortality. The manuscript is well presented. However, the authors need to revisit the text. At times, texts are not in place and there are typos in the texts.

Author Response

Dear reviewer, thank you for considering a revised version of our manuscript “Blood biomarkers to predict long term mortality after ischemic stroke” for publication in the special issue Innovative Stroke Diagnostic and Treatment Strategies for Life.

We would like to thank the reviewer for the time and effort to review the manuscript.

We are grateful to the Reviewer for pointing out the necessity to improve the writing quality of the manuscript. For that reason, we have sent the manuscript to the English editing service of MDPI (English editing ID: English-26743) to upgrade the quality of the text.  We attach the English editing certificate. All the changes have been incorporated to the text and highlighted in red.

We hope that these modifications make the original manuscript more easy to understand.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

The authors look for mortality blood markers with predictive power after stroke. The patients used were already included in a previous study and the authors did fallow ups for about 5 years.

The article is easy to read. The only suggestion I will make and encourage the authors to implement is to me a bit more clear with the description of the patients used. My biggest concern was that I needed to open the original paper to see what the inclusion and exclusion criteria were for the 941 patients tracked for this paper.

Author Response

Dear reviewer, thank you for considering a revised version of our manuscript “Blood biomarkers to predict long term mortality after ischemic stroke” for publication in the special issue Innovative Stroke Diagnostic and Treatment Strategies for Life.

We would like to thank the reviewer for the time and effort to review the manuscript.

We are grateful to the Reviewer for pointing out the necessity to improve the description of the patients used. For that reason, the original manuscript has been modified considering the reviewer concern, incorporating the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the patients (line 68-73):

In summary, inclusion criteria were suspected stroke at first medical assessment with persisting symptoms when arriving at the emergency room; age >18 years; <6 hours from symptom onset to blood sample collection; blood collection preceding thrombolytic treatment and signed informed consent. The only exclusion criteria was impossibility to collect blood samples. Moreover, patients with an unclear diagnosis 1 month after the index event were excluded from the analysis.

We hope that this modification makes the original manuscript more clear to understand.

In addition, as suggested by another reviewer we have sent the manuscript to the English editing service of MDPI (English editing ID: English-26743) to improve the quality of the text.  

Back to TopTop