Next Article in Journal
LDL-Cholesterol and Platelets: Insights into Their Interactions in Atherosclerosis
Next Article in Special Issue
Evidence of the Cellular Senescence Stress Response in Mitotically Active Brain Cells—Implications for Cancer and Neurodegeneration
Previous Article in Journal
Organic Matter in Cometary Environments
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of GammaH2AX in Buccal Cells as a Molecular Biomarker of DNA Damage in Alzheimer’s Disease in the AIBL Study of Ageing
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Opinion

Secreted Protein Acidic and Rich in Cysteine as A Regeneration Factor: Beyond the Tissue Repair

by
Abdelaziz Ghanemi
1,2,
Mayumi Yoshioka
2 and
Jonny St-Amand
1,2,*
1
Department of Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada
2
Functional Genomics Laboratory, Endocrinology and Nephrology Axis, CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Québec, QC G1V 4G2, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Life 2021, 11(1), 38; https://doi.org/10.3390/life11010038
Submission received: 7 December 2020 / Revised: 6 January 2021 / Accepted: 7 January 2021 / Published: 8 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cellular Senescence in Health, Disease and Aging: Blessing or Curse?)

Abstract

:
Diverse pathologies (inflammation, tissues injuries, cancer, etc.) and physiological conditions (obesity, physical activity, etc.) induce the expression/secretion of the matricellular protein, secrete protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC). SPARC contributes to the creation of an environment that is suitable for tissue regeneration through a variety of roles, including metabolic homeostasis, inflammation reduction, extracellular matrix remodeling and collagen maturation. Such a homeostatic environment optimizes tissue regeneration and improves tissues’ repair ability. These properties that SPARC has within the regeneration contexts could have a variety of applications, such as in obesity, cancer, sarcopenia, diabetes and bioengineering.

Graphical Abstract

Tissue regeneration is a vital process allowing organisms to overcome biological disturbances and adapt to changes and physiological development via the renewal, growth and restoration of diverse cells and tissues. The regeneration ability changes throughout the lifespan, which leads to diverse tissue malfunctions and diseases [1]. The regenerative process could be either normal or limited (abnormal) depending on the biological environment. Indeed, under healthy environmental conditions (stem cells growth ratio [2], growth factors [3], hormones [4,5], pH [6,7], etc.), the regenerative processes are optimized. They allow for regular tissue development and adaptation to the corresponding biological functions. However, under physiological (ageing [8,9]) or pathological (cancer [10], obesity [11], inflammation [12], etc.) conditions, or when impacted by disturbing stimuli or exogenous factors (such as radiations [13]), tissues’ regeneration ability and functions could be impaired. To overcome this “negative” regeneration environment, the organism has a variety of tools to compensate or reduce the intensity or the impacts. These correcting or counteracting mechanisms are mediated through what could be considered regeneration factors. Among these molecules, secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC) has a variety of roles and implications. One of the SPARC properties is its ability to optimize the regeneration environment with an improved cellular regenerative capacity from different perspectives (metabolics, tissue repair, oxidation, inflammation, cancer, etc.), as illustrated below.
SPARC, also known as BM-40 or osteonectin (32 kDa [14]), is a matricellular (extracellular matrix-associated) protein. Unlike its name (osteonectin) might suggest, SPARC expression is not limited to bones, but this glycoprotein is also present in diverse tissues including nonmineralized tissues, in platelets [15] and in muscles [16]. Such wide distribution correlates with SPARC roles during embryogenesis [17] as well as during tissue repair, cell turnover, cellular differentiation and remodeling [18,19,20,21,22], which are key steps in tissue regeneration. Therefore, SPARC expression or levels increase following injuries such as myocardial injury [23], myopathies [24] and in situations (either physiological or pathological) where tissues undergo changes (repair, renewal and remodeling) such as during obesity [18,25], skeletal muscle regeneration [26], cancer [27], systemic sclerosis, hepatic fibrosis [28] and physical exercise. Indeed, SPARC/Sparc expression increases in the skeletal muscle during training [29], as well as following electrical pulse stimulation in muscle cells (considered to be the in vitro equivalent of exercise) [30]. Such situations do represent a disturbance of the homeostasis that leads to a “negative” regeneration environment. Therefore, biological processes that overcome such a homeostatic disturbance, restore a suitable environment for regeneration and rescue the affected tissues to allow better developmental patters are required. Interestingly, the situations in which SPARC is overexpressed are mainly those requiring regeneration, either to repair tissues (injury) or adapt to tissue changes (obesity, exercised muscle, etc.). These specific patterns highlight SPARC as a regenerative factor. In addition, the importance of the extracellular matrix in regeneration suggests close interactions between SPARC, the extracellular matrix [31] and matricellular protein components such as thrombospondin-2 [32] during the regeneration process.
Tissue regeneration is a process that requires the implication of numerous cellular organelles and the use of energy. Thus, regeneration has metabolic and biochemical needs to which the cellular machinery has to adapt [33]. In this context, SPARC has been shown to be implicated in a variety of metabolic functions, such as glucose tolerance improvement [34], while it is also required for both glucose homeostasis maintenance and insulin secretion [35]. In the skeletal muscle, SPARC also seems to act towards improved metabolic properties and functions [18,24], including mitochondrial functions [30,36,37], which is of interest knowing the importance of the mitochondria during regeneration [38,39]. Importantly, our latest study suggests that exercise-induced muscle phenotype changes are SPARC-dependent [40]. These SPARC properties are also completed by their important roles in energy balance and storage. For instance, SPARC inhibits adipogenesis [41] and its inactivation leads to an enhancement of high-fat diet-induced obesity [42]. These patterns correlate with the role of SPARC in brown adipocyte activation and lipid usage in white adipocytes [43]. Such energy metabolism effects—in addition to optimizing the regeneration (synchronization)—also lead to increased energy usage, thus reducing the risk of obesity through increased energy expenditure. This represents another illustration of how SPARC counteracts the “negative” regeneration environment, since obesity itself represents a status of impaired regeneration [44]. Indeed, during obesity, many factors lead to such a “negative” regeneration environment due to all the conditions induced by or associated with obesity, such as inflammation, insulin resistance, metabolic disorders [45,46] and even stem cell changes [47,48], that impact regeneration. SPARC is extremely important for bone formation, remodeling and regeneration [14,32,49,50,51]. This is important as well, not only for the structural homeostasis, but also for both locomotion and, most importantly, the energy metabolism. Indeed, the skeletal muscle that governs most of the energy expenditure [52] is supported by the skeleton with which it forms the locomotor (musculoskeletal) system. Therefore, the good metabolic and contractile function (strength) of muscles would require homeostatic skeleton development due to the close ties between both bones and skeletal muscles, including synchronized development [53].
Furthermore, in addition to such metabolic implications, SPARC is also involved in other growth and homeostasis-related patterns, including cancer homeostasis. SPARC is overexpressed during cancer [27] and has been reported to have anti-cancer properties [54,55]. SPARC has also been shown to have interesting roles within the inflammatory processes [56,57]. It has anti-inflammatory properties [56] and can, for instance, protect from adverse cardiac inflammation during viral myocarditis [58]. These properties of controlling cancer and inflammation development would impact the microenvironment, contributing to an improved homeostasis. Moreover, SPARC is required for the immune system functions [59], which is relevant, for instance, during immune-modulatory therapy to support the regeneration of injured muscles [60] and muscle healing [61]. Importantly, more roles are yet to be explored in terms of SPARC contribution at the physiological levels, such as in cardiomyocyte contraction [23]. This cardiac role would improve the blood circulation for diverse cells, which are vital for tissue regeneration). In addition, the therapeutic practice of cardiac regeneration [2,62] could benefit from SPARC properties in cardiac regeneration [19,63] as well. Beyond the cardiac properties, SPARC has roles in the cardiovascular properties, as suggested by its production by both bone-marrow-derived cells during myocardial fibrosis (in left ventricular pressure overload) [64] and pericytes, with a possible role in postinfarct healing [65], which is supported by the possible classification of SPARC as a marker for vascular complications in pre-diabetics [66].
All these highlighted properties point to SPARC as a regeneration factor. It not only has significant roles in tissue repair or development but contributes directly and indirectly to generating a “positive” biological environment that optimizes regeneration, as summarized in the graphical abstract. Moreover, other factors that work towards reducing the regeneration ability, such as ageing [1,67] and oxidative stress [68,69], are also counteracted—at least indirectly—by SPARC effects. For instance, SPARC-induced increased muscle functions (including via interactions with actin in skeletal muscle [24]) and metabolism would increase the antioxidant effect induced by exercise [70]. This contributes to the improvement in the regeneration environment by decreasing the oxidative stress. Furthermore, an improved muscular function (including during exercise) would lead to reducing the accumulation of the lactic acid and, therefore, better control of the pH, which both impacts muscle fatigue [71,72] and represents another important factor for different cellular functions [73], including those related to regeneration [74,75]. In addition, ageing-induced collagen loss [76] would be counteracted via the roles of SPARC in collagen properties [77,78,79,80]. Moreover, many SPARC effects counteract ageing impacts. In this context, ageing is a factor that decreases the regeneration ability [67], and with which we see an increased risk of obesity [81], sarcopenia [82,83], osteoporosis [84], etc. This points to SPARC not only as a regeneration factor that counteracts the ageing-related decrease in regeneration ability, but also as a factor with key roles against ageing-induced conditions that lead to health problems including sarcopenia, obesity (a health problem that could increase with the ongoing COVID-19 crisis [85]) and osteoporosis, through metabolic, structural and functional roles, and the impacts SPARC has on the corresponding tissues and organs (muscles, adipose tissue, bone, etc.). Therefore, SPARC remains worth exploring in the ageing process and geriatric research. These examples represent additional illustrations of SPARC’s contribution to creating the optimal environment for regeneration, and further point to it as a regenerative factor.
These patterns show complimentary roles in terms of the implications of SPARC in tissue repair, and the diverse metabolic and homeostatic effects it mediates [86]. Importantly, the fact that SPARC is overexpressed during pathological situations such as obesity and cancer, as well as during physical activity (physiological adaptation), further indicates that it could represent feedback. Rather than a damaging factor, SPARC would aim to counteract/correct the negative impacts induced by the pathological situations such as inflammation and tissue damage through properties including regeneration ability, as illustrated for the skeletal muscle [87]. Indeed, conditions (pathological and physiological) that lead to impaired regeneration by creating a negative environment are the same conditions under which SPARC overexpression has been reported. Such overexpressed SPARC improves the regeneration ability and reduces the negative environment by inducing functional and metabolic enhancement at different tissues. These actions reverse, correct or reduce the impacts those initial conditions had on regeneration, which will lead to a SPARC-induced corrected regeneration ability.
This paper presents SPARC as a promising therapeutic tool in a variety of health conditions, ranging from metabolism and inflammation to obesity and sarcopenia. Importantly, SPARC could also be an option in the area of tissue engineering based on its involvement in and impacts on the regenerative processes, especially with the known implications of SPARC in the functions of stem cells [88,89], as well as other types of cells such as erythroid progenitors [90]. Thus, SPARC-related pathways also represent a potential pharmacological target to optimize therapies in regenerative medicine as an adjuvant to optimize the regeneration environment of the targeted tissues and organs.

Author Contributions

A.G. drafted the manuscript; A.G., M.Y. and J.S.-A. critically revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Abdelaziz Ghanemi received a merit scholarship for foreign students from the Ministry of Education and Higher Education of Quebec, Canada, The Fonds de recherche du Québec—Nature et technologies (FRQNT) is responsible for managing the program (Bourses d’excellence pour étudiants étrangers du Ministère de l’Éducation et de l’Enseignement supérieur du Québec, Le Fonds de recherche du Québec—Nature et technologies (FRQNT) est responsable de la gestion du programme). The graphical abstract was created using images from: http://smart.servier.com. Servier Medical Art by Servier is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yun, M.H. Changes in Regenerative Capacity through Lifespan. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 25392–25432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Zhang, Y.; Mignone, J.; MacLellan, W.R. Cardiac Regeneration and Stem Cells. Physiol. Rev. 2015, 95, 1189–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Sarker, M.D.; Naghieh, S.; McInnes, A.D.; Schreyer, D.J.; Chen, X.B. Regeneration of peripheral nerves by nerve guidance conduits: Influence of design, biopolymers, cells, growth factors, and physical stimuli. Prog. Neurobiol. 2018, 171, 125–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Easterling, M.R.; Engbrecht, K.M.; Crespi, E.J. Endocrine Regulation of Epimorphic Regeneration. Endocrinology 2019, 160, 2969–2980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Wojda, S.J.; Donahue, S.W. Parathyroid hormone for bone regeneration. J. Orthop. Res. 2018, 36, 2586–2594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Shen, Y.; Liu, W.C.; Lin, K.; Pan, H.; Darvell, B.; Peng, S.; Wen, C.; Deng, L.; Lu, W.W.; Chang, J. Interfacial pH: A Critical Factor for Osteoporotic Bone Regeneration. Langmuir 2011, 27, 2701–2708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Shen, Y.; Liu, W.; Wen, C.; Pan, H.; Wang, T.; Darvell, B.W.; Lu, W.W.; Huang, W. Bone regeneration: Importance of local pH—Strontium-doped borosilicate scaffold. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 8662–8670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pibiri, M. Liver regeneration in aged mice: New insights. Aging 2018, 10, 1801–1824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Varela-Eirin, M.; Loureiro, J.; Fonseca, E.; Corrochano, S.; Caeiro, J.R.; Collado, M.; Mayan, M.D. Cartilage regeneration and ageing: Targeting cellular plasticity in osteoarthritis. Ageing Res. Rev. 2018, 42, 56–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, H.; Ye, Z.-H. Microenvironment of liver regeneration in liver cancer. Chin. J. Integr. Med. 2017, 23, 555–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ambrosi, T.H.; Scialdone, A.; Graja, A.; Gohlke, S.; Jank, A.M.; Bocian, C.; Woelk, L.; Fan, H.; Logan, D.W.; Schürmann, A.; et al. Adipocyte Accumulation in the Bone Marrow during Obesity and Aging Impairs Stem Cell-Based Hematopoietic and Bone Regeneration. Cell. Stem. Cell. 2017, 20, 771–784.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Cooke, J.P. Inflammation and Its Role in Regeneration and Repair. Circ. Res. 2019, 124, 1166–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Korolev, Y.N.; Geniatulina, M.S.; Mikhailik, L.V.; Nikulina, L.A. Intracellular regeneration of adrenocorticocytes in response to the prophylactic application of low-intensity electromagnetic radiation under the conditions of radiation (an experimental study). Vopr. Kurortol. Fizioter. Lech. Fiz. Kul’tury 2019, 96, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Rosset, E.M.; Bradshaw, A.D. SPARC/osteonectin in mineralized tissue. Matrix Biol. 2016, 54, 78–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Maillard, C.; Malaval, L.; Delmas, P. Immunological screening of SPARC/Osteonectin in nonmineralized tissues. Bone 1992, 13, 257–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Melouane, A.; Ghanemi, A.; Aubé, S.; Yoshioka, M.; St-Amand, J. Differential gene expression analysis in ageing muscle and drug discovery perspectives. Ageing Res. Rev. 2018, 41, 53–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Motamed, K. SPARC (osteonectin/BM-40). Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 1999, 31, 1363–1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ghanemi, A.; Melouane, A.; Yoshioka, M.; St-Amand, J. Secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine and bioenergetics: Extracellular matrix, adipocytes remodeling and skeletal muscle metabolism. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2019, 117, 105627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bradshaw, A.D. The role of secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC) in cardiac repair and fibrosis: Does expression of SPARC by macrophages influence outcomes? J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2016, 93, 156–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. McCurdy, S.; Baicu, C.F.; Heymans, S.; Bradshaw, A.D. Cardiac extracellular matrix remodeling: Fibrillar collagens and Secreted Protein Acidic and Rich in Cysteine (SPARC). J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2010, 48, 544–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Yan, Q.; Sage, E.H. SPARC, a Matricellular Glycoprotein with Important Biological Functions. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 1999, 47, 1495–1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Bradshaw, A.D.; Sage, E.H. SPARC, a matricellular protein that functions in cellular differentiation and tissue response to injury. J. Clin. Investig. 2001, 107, 1049–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Deckx, S.; Johnson, D.M.; Rienks, M.; Carai, P.; Van Deel, E.; Van der Velden, J.; Sipido, K.R.; Heymans, S.; Papageorgiou, A.P. Extracellular SPARC increases cardiomyocyte contraction during health and disease. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0209534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Jørgensen, L.H.; Jepsen, P.L.; Boysen, A.; Dalgaard, L.B.; Hvid, L.G.; Ørtenblad, N.; Ravn, D.; Sellathurai, J.; Møller-Jensen, J.; Lochmuller, H.; et al. SPARC Interacts with Actin in Skeletal Muscle In Vitro and In Vivo. Am. J. Pathol. 2017, 187, 457–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Shen, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Yuan, L.; Yi, W.; Zhao, R.; Yi, Q.; Yong, T. SPARC is over-expressed in adipose tissues of diet-induced obese rats and causes insulin resistance in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Acta Histochem. 2014, 116, 158–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Petersson, S.J.; Jørgensen, L.H.; Andersen, D.C.; Nørgaard, R.C.; Jensen, C.H.; Schroeder, H.D. SPARC is up-regulated during skeletal muscle regeneration and inhibits myoblast differentiation. Histol. Histopathol. 2013, 28, 1451–1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ghanemi, A.; Yoshioka, M.; St-Amand, J. Secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine and cancer: A homeostatic hormone? Cytokine 2020, 127, 154996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Scavelli, K.; Chatterjee, A.; Rhee, U.J. Secreted Protein Acidic and Rich in Cysteine in Ocular Tissue. J. Ocul. Pharmacol. Ther. 2015, 31, 396–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Ghanemi, A.; Melouane, A.; Yoshioka, M.; St-Amand, J. Exercise and High-Fat Diet in Obesity: Functional Genomics Perspectives of Two Energy Homeostasis Pillars. Genes 2020, 11, 875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Melouane, A.; Yoshioka, M.; Kanzaki, M.; St-Amand, J. Sparc, an EPS-induced gene, modulates the extracellular matrix and mitochondrial function via ILK/AMPK pathways in C2C12 cells. Life Sci. 2019, 229, 277–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Niklason, L. Understanding the Extracellular Matrix to Enhance Stem Cell-Based Tissue Regeneration. Cell. Stem. Cell. 2018, 22, 302–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Delany, A.M.; Hankenson, K. Thrombospondin-2 and SPARC/osteonectin are critical regulators of bone remodeling. J. Cell Commun. Signal. 2009, 3, 227–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Caldez, M.J.; Van Hul, N.; Koh, H.W.; Teo, X.Q.; Fan, J.J.; Tan, P.Y.; Dewhurst, M.R.; Too, P.G.; Talib, S.Z.A.; Chiang, B.E.; et al. Metabolic Remodeling during Liver Regeneration. Dev. Cell 2018, 47, 425–438.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Aoi, W.; Hirano, N.; Lassiter, D.G.; Björnholm, M.; Chibalin, A.V.; Sakuma, K.; Tanimura, Y.; Mizushima, K.; Takagi, T.; Naito, Y.; et al. Secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC) improves glucose tolerance via AMP-activated protein kinase activation. FASEB J. 2019, 33, 10551–10562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Atorrasagasti, C.; Onorato, A.; Gimeno, M.L.; Andreone, L.; Garcia, M.; Malvicini, M.; Fiore, E.; Bayo, J.; Perone, M.J.; Mazzolini, G. SPARC is required for the maintenance of glucose homeostasis and insulin secretion in mice. Clin. Sci. 2019, 133, 351–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Melouane, A.; Carbonell, A.; Yoshioka, M.; Puymirat, J.; St-Amand, J. Implication of SPARC in the modulation of the extracellular matrix and mitochondrial function in muscle cells. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0192714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Melouane, A.; Yoshioka, M.; St-Amand, J. Extracellular matrix/mitochondria pathway: A novel potential target for sarcopenia. Mitochondrion 2020, 50, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Smith, G.M.; Gallo, G. The role of mitochondria in axon development and regeneration. Dev. Neurobiol. 2018, 78, 221–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Han, S.M.; Baig, H.S.; Hammarlund, M. Mitochondria Localize to Injured Axons to Support Regeneration. Neuron 2016, 92, 1308–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Ghanemi, A.; Melouane, A.; Yoshioka, M.; St-Amand, J. Exercise Training of Secreted Protein Acidic and Rich in Cysteine (Sparc) KO Mice Suggests That Exercise-Induced Muscle Phenotype Changes Are SPARC-Dependent. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 9108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Nie, J.; Sage, E.H. SPARC inhibits adipogenesis by its enhancement of beta-catenin signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 1279–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Nie, J.; Bradshaw, A.D.; Delany, A.M.; Sage, E.H. Inactivation of SPARC enhances high-fat diet-induced obesity in mice. Connect. Tissue Res. 2011, 52, 99–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Mukherjee, S.; Choi, M.J.; Kim, S.W.; Yun, J.-W. Secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC) regulates thermogenesis in white and brown adipocytes. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2020, 506, 110757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Ghanemi, A.; Yoshioka, M.; St-Amand, J. Regeneration during Obesity: An Impaired Homeostasis. Animals 2020, 10, 2344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Ghanemi, A.; Yoshioka, M.; St-Amand, J. Broken Energy Homeostasis and Obesity Pathogenesis: The Surrounding Concepts. J. Clin. Med. 2018, 7, 453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Ghanemi, A.; St-Amand, J. Redefining obesity toward classifying as a disease. Eur. J. Intern. Med. 2018, 55, 20–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hermetet, F.; Buffière, A.; Aznague, A.; De Barros, J.-P.P.; Bastie, J.-N.; Delva, L.; Quéré, R. High-fat diet disturbs lipid raft/TGF-β signaling-mediated maintenance of hematopoietic stem cells in mouse bone marrow. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wilkinson, A.C.; Yamazaki, S. The hematopoietic stem cell diet. Int. J. Hematol. 2018, 107, 634–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Ribeiro, N.; Sousa, S.R.; Brekken, R.A.; Monteiro, F.J. Role of SPARC in bone remodeling and cancer-related bone metastasis. J. Cell Biochem. 2014, 115, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Baloğlu, M.; Özkorkmaz, E.G. Biochemical and immunohistochemical investigations on bone formation and remodelling in ovariectomised rats with tamoxifen citrate administration. Folia Morphol. 2019, 78, 789–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Delany, A.M.; McMahon, D.J.; Powell, J.S.; Greenberg, D.A.; Kurland, E.S. Osteonectin/SPARC polymorphisms in Caucasian men with idiopathic osteoporosis. Osteoporos. Int. 2007, 19, 969–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Zurlo, F.; Larson, K.; Bogardus, C.; Ravussin, E. Skeletal muscle metabolism is a major determinant of resting energy expenditure. J. Clin. Investig. 1990, 86, 1423–1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Di Girolamo, D.J.; Kiel, D.P.; Esser, K.A. Bone and Skeletal Muscle: Neighbors with Close Ties. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2013, 28, 1509–1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Nagaraju, G.P.; Sharma, D. Anti-cancer role of SPARC, an inhibitor of adipogenesis. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2011, 37, 559–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Chlenski, A.; Guerrero, L.J.; Peddinti, R.; Spitz, J.A.; Leonhardt, P.T.; Yang, Q.; Tian, Y.; Salwen, H.R.; Cohn, S.L.; Yang, Q. Anti-angiogenic SPARC peptides inhibit progression of neuroblastoma tumors. Mol. Cancer 2010, 9, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Ghanemi, A.; Yoshioka, M.; St-Amand, J. Secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine and inflammation: Another homeostatic property? Cytokine 2020, 133, 155179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Sangaletti, S.; Tripodo, C.; Cappetti, B.; Casalini, P.; Chiodoni, C.; Piconese, S.; Santangelo, A.; Parenza, M.; Arioli, I.; Miotti, S.; et al. SPARC Oppositely Regulates Inflammation and Fibrosis in Bleomycin-Induced Lung Damage. Am. J. Pathol. 2011, 179, 3000–3010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Rienks, M.; Carai, P.; van Teeffelen, J.; Eskens, B.; Verhesen, W.; Hemmeryckx, B.; Johnson, D.M.; van Leeuwen, R.; Jones, E.A.; Heymans, S.; et al. SPARC preserves endothelial glycocalyx integrity, and protects against adverse cardiac inflammation and injury during viral myocarditis. Matrix Biol. 2018, 74, 21–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Rempel, S.A.; Hawley, R.C.; Gutiérrez, J.A.; Mouzon, E.; Bobbitt, K.R.; Lemke, N.; Schultz, C.R.; Schultz, L.R.; Golembieski, W.; Koblinski, J.; et al. Splenic and immune alterations of the Sparc-null mouse accompany a lack of immune response. Genes Immun. 2007, 8, 262–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Sass, F.A.; Fuchs, M.; Pumberger, M.; Geissler, S.; Duda, G.N.; Perka, C.; Schmidt-Bleek, K. Immunology Guides Skeletal Muscle Regeneration. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Muire, P.J.; Mangum, L.H.; Wenke, J.C. Time Course of Immune Response and Immunomodulation During Normal and Delayed Healing of Musculoskeletal Wounds. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ahuja, P.; Sdek, P.; MacLellan, W.R. Cardiac Myocyte Cell Cycle Control in Development, Disease, and Regeneration. Physiol. Rev. 2007, 87, 521–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Stary, M.; Pasteiner, W.; Summer, A.; Hrdina, A.; Eger, A.; Weitzer, G. Parietal endoderm secreted SPARC promotes early cardiomyogenesis in vitro. Exp. Cell Res. 2005, 310, 331–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Riley, H.J.; Kelly, R.R.; Van Laer, A.O.; Neff, L.S.; Dasgupta, S.; Baicu, C.F.; McDonald, L.T.; LaRue, A.C.; Zile, M.R.; Bradshaw, A.D. SPARC Production by Bone Marrow-Derived Cells Contributes to Myocardial Fibrosis in Pressure-Overload. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Avolio, E.; Mangialardi, G.; Slater, S.C.; Alvino, V.V.; Gu, Y.; Cathery, W.; Beltrami, A.P.; Katare, R.; Heesom, K.; Caputo, M.; et al. Secreted Protein Acidic and Cysteine Rich Matricellular Protein Is Enriched in the Bioactive Fraction of the Human Vascular Pericyte Secretome. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Benincasa, G.; Franzese, M.; Schiano, C.; Marfella, R.; Miceli, M.; Infante, T.; Sardu, C.; Zanfardino, M.; Affinito, O.; Mansueto, G.; et al. DNA methylation profiling of CD04(+)/CD08(+) T cells reveals pathogenic mechanisms in increasing hyperglycemia: PIRAMIDE pilot study. Annu. Med. Surg. 2020, 60, 218–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. West, M.D.; Sternberg, H.; Labat, I.; Janus, J.; Chapman, K.B.; Malik, N.N.; De Grey, A.D.; LaRocca, D. Toward a unified theory of aging and regeneration. Regen. Med. 2019, 14, 867–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Chen, F.; Liu, Y.; Wong, N.-K.; Xiao, J.; So, K.-F. Oxidative Stress in Stem Cell Aging. Cell Transplant. 2017, 26, 1483–1495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Wang, J.; Wang, H. Oxidative Stress in Pancreatic Beta Cell Regeneration. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2017, 2017, 1930261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Brioche, T.; Lemoine-Morel, S. Oxidative Stress, Sarcopenia, Antioxidant Strategies and Exercise: Molecular Aspects. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2016, 22, 2664–2678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Hultman, E.; Spriet, L.L.; Söderlund, K. Biochemistry of muscle fatigue. Biomed. Biochim. Acta 1986, 45, S97–S106. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  72. Sahlin, K. Muscle fatigue and lactic acid accumulation. Acta Physiol. Scand. Suppl. 1986, 556, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  73. Capuano, P.; Capasso, G. The importance of intracellular pH in the regulation of cell function. G Ital. Nfrol. 2003, 20, 139–150. [Google Scholar]
  74. Lönnqvist, S.; Emanuelsson, P.; Kratz, G. Influence of acidic pH on keratinocyte function and re-epithelialisation of human in vitro wounds. J. Plast. Surg. Hand Surg. 2015, 49, 346–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Kruse, C.R.; Singh, M.; Targosinski, S.; Sinha, I.; Sørensen, J.A.; Eriksson, E.; Nuutila, K. The effect of pH on cell viability, cell migration, cell proliferation, wound closure, and wound reepithelialization: In vitro and in vivo study. Wound Repair Regen. 2017, 25, 260–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Shuster, S. Osteoporosis, like skin ageing, is caused by collagen loss which is reversible. J. R. Soc. Med. 2020, 113, 158–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Ramu, I.; Buchholz, S.M.; Patzak, M.S.; Goetze, R.G.; Singh, S.K.; Richards, F.M.; Jodrell, D.I.; Sipos, B.; Ströbel, P.; Ellenrieder, V.; et al. SPARC dependent collagen deposition and gemcitabine delivery in a genetically engineered mouse model of pancreas cancer. EBioMedicine 2019, 48, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Bradshaw, A.D.; Puolakkainen, P.; Wight, T.N.; Helene, S.E.; Dasgupta, J.; Davidson, J.M. SPARC-Null Mice Display Abnormalities in the Dermis Characterized by Decreased Collagen Fibril Diameter and Reduced Tensile Strength. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2003, 120, 949–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Francki, A.; Bradshaw, A.D.; Bassuk, J.A.; Howe, C.C.; Couser, W.G.; Sage, E.H. SPARC regulates the expression of collagen type I and transforming growth factor-beta1 in mesangial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 32145–32152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Rentz, T.J.; Poobalarahi, F.; Bornstein, P.; Sage, E.H.; Bradshaw, A.D. SPARC regulates processing of procollagen I and collagen fibrillogenesis in dermal fibroblasts. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 22062–22071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Jura, M.; Kozak, L.P. Obesity and related consequences to ageing. Age (Dordrecht) 2016, 38, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Marzetti, E.; Calvani, R.; Tosato, M.; Cesari, M.; Di Bari, M.; Cherubini, A.; Collamati, A.; D’Angelo, E.; Pahor, M.; Bernabei, R.; et al. Sarcopenia: An overview. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 2017, 29, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Melouane, A.; Ghanemi, A.; Yoshioka, M.; St-Amand, J. Functional genomics applications and therapeutic implications in sarcopenia. Mutat. Res. 2019, 781, 175–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Aspray, T.J.; Hill, T.R. Osteoporosis and the Ageing Skeleton. Subcell. Biochem. 2019, 91, 453–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Ghanemi, A.; Yoshioka, M.; St-Amand, J. Will an obesity pandemic replace the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic? Med. Hypotheses 2020, 144, 110042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Ghanemi, A.; Yoshioka, M.; St-Amand, J. Secreted Protein Acidic and Rich in Cysteine: Metabolic and Homeostatic Properties beyond the Extracellular Matrix Structure. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 2388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Jørgensen, L.H.; Petersson, S.J.; Sellathurai, J.; Andersen, D.C.; Thayssen, S.; Sant, D.J.; Jensen, C.H.; Schroeder, H.D. Secreted Protein Acidic and Rich in Cysteine (SPARC) in Human Skeletal Muscle. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2008, 57, 29–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Cheng, L.; Sun, X.; Guo, J.; Lu, G. SPARC support the expansion of cord blood stem cells in vitro. Cell Res. 2008, 18, S49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Zhu, J.; Wang, L.-Y.; Li, C.-Y.; Wu, J.-Y.; Zhang, Y.-T.; Pang, K.-P.; Wei, Y.; Du, L.-Q.; Liu, M.; Wu, X.-Y. SPARC promotes self-renewal of limbal epithelial stem cells and ocular surface restoration through JNK and p38-MAPK signaling pathways. Stem Cells 2019, 38, 134–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Luo, Z.; Luo, P.; Yu, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Zhao, X.; Cheng, L. SPARC promotes the development of erythroid progenitors. Exp. Hematol. 2012, 40, 828–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ghanemi, A.; Yoshioka, M.; St-Amand, J. Secreted Protein Acidic and Rich in Cysteine as A Regeneration Factor: Beyond the Tissue Repair. Life 2021, 11, 38. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11010038

AMA Style

Ghanemi A, Yoshioka M, St-Amand J. Secreted Protein Acidic and Rich in Cysteine as A Regeneration Factor: Beyond the Tissue Repair. Life. 2021; 11(1):38. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11010038

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ghanemi, Abdelaziz, Mayumi Yoshioka, and Jonny St-Amand. 2021. "Secreted Protein Acidic and Rich in Cysteine as A Regeneration Factor: Beyond the Tissue Repair" Life 11, no. 1: 38. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11010038

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop