Next Article in Journal
Treatment of Advanced Melanoma: Past, Present and Future
Previous Article in Journal
Osteoclasts and Microgravity
Article

Comparing Three Different Extraction Techniques on Essential Oil Profiles of Cultivated and Wild Lotus (Nelumbo nucifera) Flower

by 1,2,3 and 1,2,3,*
1
CAS Key Laboratory of Plant Germplasm Enhancement and Specialty Agriculture, Wuhan Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430074, China
2
Sino-African Joint Research Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430074, China
3
Innovation Academy for Drug Discovery and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201203, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Life 2020, 10(9), 209; https://doi.org/10.3390/life10090209
Received: 6 August 2020 / Revised: 2 September 2020 / Accepted: 14 September 2020 / Published: 16 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Science)
Essential oil components of Nelumbo nucifera flowers from cultivated and wild lotus samples were analyzed and compared using three different extraction techniques, i.e., headspace extraction (HE), steam distillation (SD) and solvent extraction (SE), coupled with GC-MS. Forty-two peaks in the GC-MS analysis were identified as essential oil components extracted by the three methods from N. nucifera flower. The major essential oil components extracted by SD method were found to be Z,Z-10,12-hexadecadienal and E-14-hexadecenal with relative contents of 16.3% and 16.7%, respectively, which is different from that of SE method, i.e., n-hexadecanoic acid and Z,Z-9,12-octadecadienoic acid accounting for 25.8% and 26.8%, respectively. HE method demonstrated a possibility to be used as an in situ and simplest method for extracting the essential oil components from raw materials. By adding a small amount of glycerinum onto the surface of the air-dried flower sample as a solvent trap in the HE method, the volatility of the essential oil components was found to increase by two times for the first time, which could be further utilized to improve the extraction efficiency and the recovery of the essential oil components from other materials for more applications. In addition, the comparison of essential oil components between cultivated and wild samples showed that they differed only in the chemical contents but not in chemical components. This will be a comprehensive report on the chemical information of the essential oil components of N. nucifera flower and provide guidance for its further exploration as high value-added products in the food and healthcare industries. View Full-Text
Keywords: extraction technique; essential oil; N. nucifera flower; GC-MS extraction technique; essential oil; N. nucifera flower; GC-MS
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, C.-Y.; Guo, M. Comparing Three Different Extraction Techniques on Essential Oil Profiles of Cultivated and Wild Lotus (Nelumbo nucifera) Flower. Life 2020, 10, 209. https://doi.org/10.3390/life10090209

AMA Style

Zhang C-Y, Guo M. Comparing Three Different Extraction Techniques on Essential Oil Profiles of Cultivated and Wild Lotus (Nelumbo nucifera) Flower. Life. 2020; 10(9):209. https://doi.org/10.3390/life10090209

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Chun-Yun, and Mingquan Guo. 2020. "Comparing Three Different Extraction Techniques on Essential Oil Profiles of Cultivated and Wild Lotus (Nelumbo nucifera) Flower" Life 10, no. 9: 209. https://doi.org/10.3390/life10090209

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop