Previous Article in Journal
CPU Deployment-Oriented Evaluation of Compact Neural Networks for Remaining Useful Life Prediction
Previous Article in Special Issue
ANN-Based Direct Power Control for Improved Dynamic Performance of DFIG-Based Wind Turbine System: Experimental Validation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Dual-Stator Versus Dual-Mover Segmented Secondary Hybrid Excited Linear Flux Switching Machine for Ropeless Elevator System

Department of Electrical Engineering, COMSATS University Islamabad (Abbottabad Campus), Abbottabad 22060, Pakistan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Machines 2026, 14(4), 374; https://doi.org/10.3390/machines14040374 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 12 February 2026 / Revised: 13 March 2026 / Accepted: 26 March 2026 / Published: 28 March 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Wound Field and Less Rare-Earth Electrical Machines in Renewables)

Abstract

Rotatory electric motors provide low efficiency in the case of linear motion. The reason for this is the mechanical conversion system required to convert rotary torque to linear thrust force. In this paper, two novel linear machines i.e., a Dual-Mover Segmented Secondary Hybrid Excited Linear Flux Switching Machine (DMSSHELFSM) and Dual-Stator Segmented Secondary Hybrid Excited Linear Flux Switching Machine (DSSSHELFSM), were investigated and compared for a ropeless vertical elevator system. The novelties of these designs include both series and parallel magnetic circuits, a complementary AC coil structure, and their unequal primary tooth width. Results reveal that the DSSSHELFSM exhibits better performance with higher and more sinusoidal flux linkage, higher thrust force, and a robust mechanical structure. Secondly, the selected linear motor was optimized using a deterministic optimization approach. An average thrust force of 10kN and a thrust force ripple ratio of less than 10% were considered as performance constraints during the optimization process. Finally, full-scale no-load experimental results were obtained, and they validated the research.
Keywords: Hybrid Excited Linear Flux Switching Machine; segmented secondary; ropeless elevator system; deterministic optimization Hybrid Excited Linear Flux Switching Machine; segmented secondary; ropeless elevator system; deterministic optimization

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ullah, N.; Shahzad, M.; Khan, F. Dual-Stator Versus Dual-Mover Segmented Secondary Hybrid Excited Linear Flux Switching Machine for Ropeless Elevator System. Machines 2026, 14, 374. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines14040374

AMA Style

Ullah N, Shahzad M, Khan F. Dual-Stator Versus Dual-Mover Segmented Secondary Hybrid Excited Linear Flux Switching Machine for Ropeless Elevator System. Machines. 2026; 14(4):374. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines14040374

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ullah, Noman, Mohsin Shahzad, and Faisal Khan. 2026. "Dual-Stator Versus Dual-Mover Segmented Secondary Hybrid Excited Linear Flux Switching Machine for Ropeless Elevator System" Machines 14, no. 4: 374. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines14040374

APA Style

Ullah, N., Shahzad, M., & Khan, F. (2026). Dual-Stator Versus Dual-Mover Segmented Secondary Hybrid Excited Linear Flux Switching Machine for Ropeless Elevator System. Machines, 14(4), 374. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines14040374

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop