Optimization of Composite Sandwich Structures: A Review
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Optimization Problem Formulation and Optimization of Algorithms
3. Methodology Adopted to Conduct This Review Study
4. Motivation to Prepare This Review Article on the Optimization of Composite Sandwich Constructions
5. Advanced Analysis and Optimization Procedures of Composite Sandwich Structures
6. Optimization of Innovative Core Structural Elements
6.1. Optimization Studies of Lattice Cores
6.2. Optimization Studies of Honecomb and Foam Cores
6.3. Optimization Studies of Bio-Inspired/Green Cores
7. Optimization Studies of Composite Sandwich Constructions
7.1. Topology Optimization of Sandwich Structures
7.2. Optimization of Sandwich Structures for Buckling Load
7.3. Optimization of Sandwich Structures for Dynamic Load
7.4. Optimization of Sandwich Structures for Impact Load
7.5. Optimization of Sandwich Structures for Acoustic Performance
8. Optimization of Sandwich Structures (Case Studies and Applications)
8.1. Optimization of Sandwich Structures Applied in the Aerospace Industry
8.2. Optimization of Sandwich Structures Applied in the Automotive Industry
9. Optimization of Sandwich Structures Using Genetic Algorithms
10. Conclusions
- A typical optimization problem includes the objective functions, design variables, and design constraints. An optimization procedure consists of an analytical or FE-based numerical simulation method. Depending on the complexity of the optimization problem, an adequate optimization algorithm has to be used to find the optimal variables. Finally, experimental or simulation-based validation has to be completed.
- The performance of composite sandwich structures depends mainly on the material, type, and geometry of the core and the facesheet structural components. These characteristics are the main parameters to be optimized.The most frequently applied design variables of the cores in the case of optimization of sandwich structures are their material, geometry, height, wall thickness, etc. There are several core geometries used in optimization studies, like the lattice core, auxetic core, functionally graded core, corrugated core, honeycomb core, metallic or polymer foam core, and bio-inspired core.The most commonly used design variables of the facesheets in the case of optimization of sandwich structures are their thickness, fiber orientation, layer sequence, as well as materials like carbon fiber, glass fiber, Kevlar fiber, or metallic materials, i.e., aluminum or steel.
- Based on the analysis of the reviewed articles, it can be concluded that the main optimization fields of sandwich structures are optimization of the core and the facesheet structural elements, as well as optimization of the whole sandwich construction.Most of the studies focus on the topological optimization of cores, which emphasizes how different core configurations influence the performance of sandwich constructions. Several optimization procedures use ML-based topological optimization tools (e.g., nTop Simulation module, Altair’s OptiStruct 2017 software, etc.) along with material models like the SIMP method to achieve the optimal core configuration under various loading conditions. With the advancement in 3D-printing technology, the possibility of validating complex-shaped lattice core structures is also a frequently researched topic. The most important parameters to be optimized for facesheets of sandwich constructions are their material, laminate thickness, fiber orientation, and stacking sequence.Most of the performance-based optimization studies include methods to improve the acoustic performance of the whole sandwich constructions, to achieve the optimal parameters like sound transmission loss, sound absorption coefficient, and structural weight.
- Several optimization methods are proposed for the composite sandwich constructions based on the aimed objective function/functions, as well as taking into consideration the required design constraints.The most commonly used objective functions during the structural optimization are the structural weight, cost, specific energy absorption, transmitted load, and sound transmission loss.The most frequently used design constraints are structural deformations, bending and torsional stiffness, eigenfrequency, facesheet and core buckling load, and stress. Furthermore, several loading conditions are used in the structural optimization of sandwich constructions, i.e., compressive or buckling load, bending load, axial load, hydrostatic load, impact load, blast load, thermal load, and dynamic or vibration load.
- An efficient optimization procedure can significantly reduce the computational time; however, the reliability and the precision of the optimization results are also significant. To achieve this, Machine Learning (ML) techniques such as Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) are used with Stochastic methods like Genetic Algorithms (GAs) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithms. The most preferred ML-based algorithm applied in the case of single- and multi-objective optimization is the Non-dominating Sorting Genetic Algorithm-II (NSGA-II). Additionally, other optimization methods, including Generalized Regression Neural Networks (GRNN), the Extreme Learning Machine (ELM), Support Vector Regression (SVR), and Radial Basis Functions (RBFs), are also commonly used. Other frequently used general optimization methods are the Method of Feasible Directions (MFD), Flexible Tolerance Optimization (FTO), Multi-Island Genetic Algorithm (MIGA), Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization (MOPSO), and the Bidirectional Evolutionary Structural Optimization (BESO) algorithm.
- Finite Element Methods are generally used for numerical simulations during the optimization of sandwich constructions for the validation of optimal results. Furthermore, analytical/mathematical techniques and numerical simulations are used to construct surrogate models by using further methods such as the Response Surface Method (RSM) and Latin Hypercube Sampling Method (LHS). The most commonly applied analytical methods for the simulation models are the First Order Shear Deformation Theories (FOSDTs), the Higher Order Shear Deformation Theories (HOSDTs), and the Rayleigh–Ritz method. The most frequently used failure theory in the numerical simulations is the Classical Laminate Plate Theory (CLPT).
- Various Finite Element simulation tools—including ANSYS, Nastran, ABAQUS CAE, and LS-DYNA—are widely used during the optimization of composite sandwich structures. These software packages enable the development of detailed FE models of complete sandwich constructions or novel core designs (e.g., lattice core or bio-inspired core structures). The FE-based numerical simulations have dual purposes: validating optimization results and experimental findings, while also being integrated within optimization loops to perform structural analyses of various design variables generated by optimization algorithms.Meanwhile, MATLAB’s Optimization Toolbox offers built-in algorithms like Genetic Algorithms, which have been widely adopted in optimization studies. Additionally, new optimization frameworks are developed using MATLAB and Python scripting, which are integrated with FE simulations for comprehensive structural analysis.
- Experimental validation studies were systematically conducted to verify optimization results for sandwich structures. Test specimens were manufactured either in compliance with relevant ASTM standards (e.g., ASTM D7249 for facesheet strength and stiffness properties) or using systematically varied material combinations and geometric configurations of facesheets and cores. The experimentation included comprehensive mechanical and functional testing: three-point bending tests to evaluate flexural properties, buckling load tests for stability assessment, dynamic analyses (vibration and modal frequency characterization), impact resistance evaluations, as well as thermal insulation and acoustic performance measurements. Relating to the core-specific validation, most of the studies used 3D-printed core specimens subjected to multiple loading conditions. These experimental investigations provided critical verification of numerical simulation results while assessing structural performance under realistic operating conditions.
- Global sustainability demands for future composite structures require the use of eco-friendly bio-composites in the core and facesheets of composite sandwich constructions. However, these bio-composites have inherent variability in properties, which makes the design of the composite sandwich structure challenging. This necessitates the application of advanced optimization techniques, taking into consideration the huge variety of composite material characteristics while maintaining structural integrity with a lightweight performance. Moreover, hybrid composite materials, i.e., combinations of synthetic and bio-composites, can be utilized for facesheets and the core of sandwich constructions for structural optimization in various applications.
- Efficient structural design of the core element is critical for enhancing the performance of sandwich constructions. Recent advances in 3D-printing technologies enable the manufacturing of complex core constructions (e.g., lattice and bio-inspired cores). Topology optimization methods can be applied to refine core designs, which significantly improves the overall structural efficiency of sandwich constructions under various loading conditions.Furthermore, novel optimization procedures for core structural design and material selection should be developed in order to minimize the manufacturing time and material utilization, resulting in an overall reduction in structural cost.
- The optimization of sandwich structures has become increasingly complex, which considers multiple competing objectives simultaneously. Modern optimization problems involve complex objective functions that balance structural weight, material costs, manufacturing time, and performance requirements. These also have to account for challenging combined loading conditions like thermal-mechanical stresses and dynamic impacts, along with manufacturing constraints from processes like 3D printing. Additionally, several design constraints and design variables further complicate the optimization processes. To effectively address these complex challenges, novel multi-objective optimization methods have to be developed. These advanced methods can simultaneously optimize all competing objectives, such as minimizing weight and costs while maximizing structural performance for given practical applications.
- Future optimization methods have to integrate modern Machine Learning techniques with advanced computational approaches to address the challenges in solving the complex optimization problems of sandwich structures. Hybrid optimization frameworks can combine established algorithms like Genetic Algorithms and Particle Swarm Optimization with ML techniques such as Artificial Neural Networks. These optimization methodologies can use the FE-based high-fidelity simulation data to train the ANNs for developing accurate surrogate models, which will reduce the computation time for the optimization process while maintaining the accuracy of results.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
Al | Aluminum |
ANN | Artificial Neural Network |
ANOVA | Analysis of Variance |
ASTM | American Society for Testing and Materials |
BESO | Bidirectional Evolutionary Structural Optimization |
BPNN | Back Propagation Neural Network |
CDM | Continuum Damage Mechanics |
CFE | Crushing Force Efficiency |
CFRP | Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Plastic |
CLPT | Classical Laminate Plate Theory |
CZM | Cohesive Zone Model |
DNN | Deep Neural Network |
DOE | Design of Experiment |
ELM | Extreme Learning Machine |
FE | Finite Element |
FGM | Functionally Graded Material |
FOSDT | First Order Shear Deformation Theory |
FRP | Fiber-Reinforced Polymers |
FTO | Flexible Tolerance Optimization |
GA | Genetic Algorithm |
GFRP | Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer |
GRNN | Generalized Regression Neural Network |
HOSDT | Higher Order Shear Deformation Theory |
LHS | Latin Hypercube Sampling |
LM | Levenberg Marquardt |
MAE | Mean Absolute Error |
MDPI | Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute |
MFD | Method of Feasible Directions |
MIGA | Multi-Island Genetic Algorithm |
ML | Machine Learning |
MOGA | Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm |
MOPSO | Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization |
MSE | Mean Squared Error |
NASA | National Aeronautics and Space Administration |
NDI | Non-Destructive Inspection |
NN | Neural Network |
NSGA | Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm |
NURBS | Non-Uniform Rational B-Splines |
OSP | Occupant Side Plate |
PLA | Poly Lactic Acid |
PR | Polynomial Regression |
PSO | Particle Swarm Optimization |
RAMP | Rational Approximation of Material Properties |
RBF | Radial Basis Functions |
RMSE | Root Mean Squared Error |
RSM | Response Surface Method |
SAC | Sound Absorption Coefficient |
SEA | Specific Energy Absorption |
SHM | Structural Health Monitoring |
SIMP | Solid Isotropic Microstructure with Penalization |
SSP | Struck Side Plate |
STL | Sound Transmission Loss |
SVR | Support Vector Regression |
TOPSIS | Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution |
TPMS | Triply Periodic Minimal Surfaces |
References
- Deng, Y.; Yu, H.; Li, J.; Zheng, Y.; Wei, G. Experimental Investigation on Mechanical Properties of the Sandwich Structure with Orthogonal Corrugated Core Reinforced by Polyurethane Foam. Polym. Compos. 2025, 46, 1626–1640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kohar, R.; Miskolci, J.; Pompas, L.; Kucera, L.; Stevko, P.; Petru, M.; Mishra, R.K. Computational Analysis of Mechanical Properties in Polymeric Sandwich Composite Materials. Polymers 2024, 16, 673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meddour, M.; Si Salem, A.; Ait Taleb, S. Bending Behavior of New Composited Sandwich Panels with GFRP Waste Based-Core and PVC Facesheets: Experimental Design, Modeling and Optimization. Constr. Build. Mater. 2024, 426, 136117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szavá, R.I.; Szavá, I.; Vlase, S.; Modrea, A. Determination of Young’s Moduli of the Phases of Composite Materials Reinforced with Longitudinal Fibers, by Global Measurements. Symmetry 2020, 12, 1607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vijaya Ramnath, B.; Elanchezhian, C.; Shreyas, P.S.; Shriramkumar, S.; Ramanan, N.; Dinesh Riju, R. A Review Onsandwich and Natural Fiber Composites. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 390, 012069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Fatlawi, A.; Jármai, K.; Kovács, G. Optimization of a Totally Fiber-Reinforced Plastic Composite Sandwich Construction of Helicopter Floor for Weight Saving, Fuel Saving and Higher Safety. Polymers 2021, 13, 2735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Al-Fatlawi, A.; Jármai, K.; Kovács, G. Optimum Design of Solar Sandwich Panels for Satellites Applications. In Vehicle and Automotive Engineering 3, Proceedings of the 3rd VAE2020, Miskolc; Springer: Singapore, 2021; pp. 427–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nunes, J.P.; Silva, J.F. Sandwiched Composites in Aerospace Engineering. In Advanced Composite Materials for Aerospace Engineering; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 129–174. ISBN 978-0-08-100939-0. [Google Scholar]
- Dias, L.D.C.L.; Nunes, E.P.; Alvarenga, M.C.N.; Ávila, A.F. Design of a Mono-Leaf in Sandwich Structure for Application in Light-Load Vehicle Using Finite Element Method. SAE Tech. Paper 2021, 2020-36-0208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sahib, M.M.; Kovács, G.; Szávai, S. Weight Optimization of All-Composite Sandwich Structures for Automotive Applications. In Vehicle and Automotive Engineering 4, Proceedings of the 4rd VAE2023, Miskolc; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 720–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Das, R. A Review on Manufacture of Polymeric Foam Cores for Sandwich Structures of Complex Shape in Automotive Applications. J. Sandw. Struct. Mater. 2022, 24, 789–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Osa-uwagboe, N.; Silberschmidt, V.V.; Demirci, E. Dynamic Bending Behaviour of Sandwich Structures for Marine Applications. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 11110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Osa-uwagboe, N.; Udu, A.G.; Silberschmidt, V.V.; Baxevanakis, K.P.; Demirci, E. Effects of Seawater on Mechanical Performance of Composite Sandwich Structures: A Machine Learning Framework. Materials 2024, 17, 2549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiu, Y.; Yan, R.; Lei, J.; Li, G.; Shen, W.; Hu, Y. Ultimate Bearing Capacity and Fatigue Life Analysis of Marine Sandwich Composite Bolted Connection Structure: Fatigue Test and Numerical Simulation. Mar. Struct. 2025, 101, 103770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, L.; Mehta, R.; Athreya, S.R.; Barpanda, D.; Shafi, A. Composite Processing Modeling for Wind Turbine Blade Applications. SAMPE J. 2017, 53, 34–44. [Google Scholar]
- Vernardos, S.M.; Gantes, C.J. Cross-Section Optimization of Sandwich-Type Cylindrical Wind Turbine Towers. Am. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2015, 8, 471–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Young, A.C.; Goupee, A.J.; Dagher, H.J.; Viselli, A.M. Methodology for Optimizing Composite Towers for Use on Floating Wind Turbines. J. Renew. Sustain. Energy 2017, 9, 033305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ni, C.; Lu, L.; Liu, G.; Zhang, L.; Mao, J.; An, Q.; Li, J. Deformation and Failure of Asymmetric Sandwich Structures under Low-Velocity Impact. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2024, 161, 108324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sawant, R.; Patel, S. Efficient Design of Composite Honeycomb Sandwich Panels under Blast Loading. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 2024, 238, 10515–10535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, Z.; Duan, Y.; Qi, J.; Zhang, F.; Li, B.; Liu, M.; Jin, P. Energy Absorption Properties of Origami-Based Re-Entrant Honeycomb Sandwich Structures with CFRP Subjected to Low-Velocity Impact. Polym. Compos. 2025, 46, 1857–1870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, Y.; Wu, Z.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, C.; Xiaohui, R. A Strategy Improving Stiffness to Resist Local Vibration of Sandwich Plates by Extended Legendre Higher-Order Model. Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct. 2024, 31, 2784–2801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, H.; Zhong, Y.; Liu, X.; Shi, J. A VAM-Based Equivalent Model for Random Vibration of Composite Sandwich Plate with Arrowhead-on Cores. Compos. Struct. 2023, 313, 116946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oktav, A.; Başaran, M.A.; Darıcık, F. Dynamic Response Optimization of a Thermoplastic Composite Sandwich Beam under Random Vibration. Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct. 2024, 31, 6252–6265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Madeira, J.F.A.; Araújo, A.L.; Soares, C.M.M.; Soares, C.A.M.; Ferreira, A.J.M. Multiobjective Design of Viscoelastic Laminated Composite Sandwich Panels. Compos. Part B Eng. 2015, 77, 391–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al Amouri, H.; Khalil, K.; Rizk, G.; Alfayad, S. Design, Thermal-Mechanical Coupling Analysis, and Optimization of Polymeric Matrix Composite Sandwiches with a Lattice Core Exposed to a High Temperature. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part J. Mater. Des. Appl. 2025, 239, 3–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, X.; Zhang, W.; Geng, X.; Xin, F. Broadband Sound Absorption of Micro-Perforated Sandwich Panels with Hierarchical Honeycomb Core at High Sound Pressure Levels. Compos. Struct. 2025, 354, 118794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Y.; Qi, X.; Sun, L.; Wang, B.; Hu, L.; Wang, P.; Li, W. Sound Transmission Loss and Bending Properties of Sandwich Structures Based on Triply Periodic Minimal Surfaces. Thin-Walled Struct. 2024, 204, 112324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szabó, F.J. Investigation and Comparison of Iteration Curves of Optimization Algorithms. Des. Mach. Struct. 2023, 13, 93–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farkas, J.; Jármai, K. Analysis and Optimum Design of Metal Structures, 1st ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2020; ISBN 978-1-003-07794-7. [Google Scholar]
- Muc, A. Evolutionary Design of Engineering Constructions. Lat. Am. J. Solids Struct. 2018, 15, e87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scopus Database. Available online: https://www.scopus.com (accessed on 3 April 2025).
- Li, S.; Yang, R.; Sun, S.; Niu, B. Advances in the Analysis of Honeycomb Structures: A Comprehensive Review. Compos. Part B Eng. 2025, 296, 112208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garg, A.; Belarbi, M.-O.; Chalak, H.D.; Chakrabarti, A. A Review of the Analysis of Sandwich FGM Structures. Compos. Struct. 2021, 258, 113427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sandeep, S.H.; Srinivasa, C.V. Hybrid Sandwich Panels: A Review. Int. J. Appl. Mech. Eng. 2020, 25, 64–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Birman, V.; Kardomateas, G.A. Review of Current Trends in Research and Applications of Sandwich Structures. Compos. Part B Eng. 2018, 142, 221–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sayyad, A.S.; Ghugal, Y.M. Bending, Buckling and Free Vibration of Laminated Composite and Sandwich Beams: A Critical Review of Literature. Compos. Struct. 2017, 171, 486–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ngo, T.D.; Kashani, A.; Imbalzano, G.; Nguyen, K.T.Q.; Hui, D. Additive Manufacturing (3D Printing): A Review of Materials, Methods, Applications and Challenges. Compos. Part B Eng. 2018, 143, 172–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Charkaoui, A.; Hassan, N.M.; Bahroun, Z. Enhancing Mechanical Properties of Cellular Core Sandwich Panels: A Review of Topological Parameters and Design Improvements. Mater. Res. Express 2023, 10, 102001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, P.; Peng, Y.; Li, S.; Rao, Y.; Le Duigou, A.; Wang, K.; Ahzi, S. 3D Printed Continuous Fiber Reinforced Composite Lightweight Structures: A Review and Outlook. Compos. Part B Eng. 2023, 250, 110450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ha, N.S.; Lu, G. A Review of Recent Research on Bio-Inspired Structures and Materials for Energy Absorption Applications. Compos. Part B Eng. 2020, 181, 107496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, Y.; Qiu, H.; Gao, Y.; Zheng, H.; Tan, J. Creative Design for Sandwich Structures: A Review. Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst. 2020, 17, 1729881420921327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sahu, S.K.; Sreekanth, P.S.R.; Reddy, S.V.K. A Brief Review on Advanced Sandwich Structures with Customized Design Core and Composite Face Sheet. Polymers 2022, 14, 4267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yin, H.; Zhang, W.; Zhu, L.; Meng, F.; Liu, J.; Wen, G. Review on Lattice Structures for Energy Absorption Properties. Compos. Struct. 2023, 304, 116397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Faidzi, M.K.; Abdullah, S.; Abdullah, M.F.; Azman, A.H.; Hui, D.; Singh, S.S.K. Review of Current Trends for Metal-Based Sandwich Panel: Failure Mechanisms and Their Contribution Factors. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2021, 123, 105302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, H.; Yuan, H.; Zhang, J.; Ruan, D. Review of Sandwich Structures under Impact Loadings: Experimental, Numerical and Theoretical Analysis. Thin-Walled Struct. 2024, 196, 111541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karsandik, Y.; Sabuncuoglu, B.; Yildirim, B.; Silberschmidt, V.V. Impact Behavior of Sandwich Composites for Aviation Applications: A Review. Compos. Struct. 2023, 314, 116941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thomas, T.; Tiwari, G. Crushing Behavior of Honeycomb Structure: A Review. Int. J. Crashworthiness 2019, 24, 555–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ribeiro Junior, R.F.; Gomes, G.F. On the Use of Machine Learning for Damage Assessment in Composite Structures: A Review. Appl. Compos. Mater. 2024, 31, 1–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliveira, P.R.; May, M.; Panzera, T.H.; Hiermaier, S. Bio-Based/Green Sandwich Structures: A Review. Thin-Walled Struct. 2022, 177, 109426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Todor, M.-P.; Kiss, I.; Cioata, V.G. Development of Fabric-Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composites Using Bio-Based Components from Post-Consumer Textile Waste. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 45, 4150–4156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramakrishnan, G.; Vijaya Ramnath, B.; Vignesh, C.; Vignesh, L.; Perunddevan, T.; VidhyaRajan, M. Sandwich and Natural Fiber Composites—A Review. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 390, 012067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galos, J.; Das, R.; Sutcliffe, M.P.; Mouritz, A.P. Review of Balsa Core Sandwich Composite Structures. Mater. Des. 2022, 221, 111013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castanie, B.; Bouvet, C.; Ginot, M. Review of Composite Sandwich Structure in Aeronautic Applications. Compos. Part C Open Access 2020, 1, 100004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kausar, A.; Ahmad, I.; Rakha, S.A.; Eisa, M.H.; Diallo, A. State-of-the-Art of Sandwich Composite Structures: Manufacturing—To—High Performance Applications. J. Compos. Sci. 2023, 7, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muc, A.; Flis, J.; Augustyn, M. Optimal Design of Plated/Shell Structures under Flutter Constraints-A Literature Review. Materials 2019, 12, 4215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassani, S.; Mousavi, M.; Gandomi, A.H. Structural Health Monitoring in Composite Structures: A Comprehensive Review. Sensors 2021, 22, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ercument, D.B.; Safaei, B.; Sahmani, S.; Zeeshan, Q. Machine Learning and Optimization Algorithms for Vibration, Bending and Buckling Analyses of Composite/Nanocomposite Structures: A Systematic and Comprehensive Review. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 2024, 32, 1679–1731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, A.; Mukhopadhyay, T.; Rangappa, S.M.; Siengchin, S.; Kushvaha, V. Advances in Computational Intelligence of Polymer Composite Materials: Machine Learning Assisted Modeling, Analysis and Design. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 2022, 29, 3341–3385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Sobey, A. A Comparative Review between Genetic Algorithm Use in Composite Optimisation and the State-of-the-Art in Evolutionary Computation. Compos. Struct. 2020, 233, 111739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nikbakt, S.; Kamarian, S.; Shakeri, M. A Review on Optimization of Composite Structures Part I: Laminated Composites. Compos. Struct. 2018, 195, 158–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nikbakht, S.; Kamarian, S.; Shakeri, M. A Review on Optimization of Composite Structures Part II: Functionally Graded Materials. Compos. Struct. 2019, 214, 83–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, W.; Liu, S. New Method for Predicting the Wrinkling Stress in Sandwich Panels. Arch. Appl. Mech. 2025, 95, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- DorMohammadi, S.; Rais-Rohani, M.; Rouhi, M. A Multilevel Approach for Analysis and Optimization of Nano-Enhanced Composite Structures. Compos. Struct. 2015, 131, 1050–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, X.; Li, G.; Meng, Z. Multi-Objective Optimization Design of a New Non-Uniform Rectangular Honeycomb Sandwich Panel. Thin-Walled Struct. 2024, 198, 111729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Lei, H.; Yang, H.; Wang, H.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, H.; Chen, H. Compressive Local Buckling of Integrated Fluted-Core Sandwich Composite Panels. Mech. Mater. 2021, 160, 103954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seyyedrahmani, F.; Khandar Shahabad, P.; Serhat, G.; Bediz, B.; Basdogan, I. Multi-Objective Optimization of Composite Sandwich Panels Using Lamination Parameters and Spectral Chebyshev Method. Compos. Struct. 2022, 289, 115417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sjølund, J.H.; Peeters, D.; Lund, E. Discrete Material and Thickness Optimization of Sandwich Structures. Compos. Struct. 2019, 217, 75–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kovács, G. Optimization of a New Composite Multicellular Plate Structure in Order to Reduce Weight. Polymers 2022, 14, 3121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, J.; Chen, J.; Lv, Y.; Zeng, A.; Zhang, X.; Huang, L. Bending Performance of Curved Sandwich Panels Comprising GFRP Face Sheets and Web Cores: Experimental Investigation and Theoretical Model. Thin-Walled Struct. 2022, 181, 110156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, H.; Mei, Z.; Li, H.; Wu, D. A Comprehensive Investigation on Bending Stiffness of Composite Grid-Stiffened and Functional Foams Sandwich Beam. AIP Adv. 2022, 12, 105226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gaydachuk, V.E.; Kondratiev, A.V.; Potapov, A.M. Weight Optimization of Design Structural Parameters of Sandwich Composite Shells. Mech. Compos. Mater. 2023, 59, 319–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dobos, J.; Hanon, M.M.; Oldal, I. Effect of Infill Density and Pattern on the Specific Load Capacity of FDM 3D-Printed PLA Multi-Layer Sandwich. J. Polym. Eng. 2022, 42, 118–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ISO-178; Plastics—Determination of flexural properties. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019.
- Yuan, L.; Taetragool, U.; Batra, R.C. Optimum First Failure Loads of One- and Two-Core Doubly Curved Sandwich Shells. AIAA J. 2020, 58, 3665–3679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, X.; Zhang, M.; Huang, Y.; Sang, L.; Hou, W. Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Thermoplastic Honeycomb Sandwich Structures under Bending Loading. Thin-Walled Struct. 2020, 155, 106961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, G.; Huo, X.; Chen, D.; Li, Q. Experimental and Numerical Study on Honeycomb Sandwich Panels under Bending and In-Panel Compression. Mater. Des. 2017, 133, 154–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castañeda, W.M.; Yarasca, J.; Mantari, J.L. Best Shear Deformation Theories Based on Polynomial Expansions for Sandwich Beams. Eng. Struct. 2019, 190, 422–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Çınar, O.; Erdal, M.; Kayran, A. Accurate Equivalent Models of Sandwich Laminates with Honeycomb Core and Composite Face Sheets via Optimization Involving Modal Behavior. J. Sandw. Struct. Mater. 2017, 19, 139–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hui, Y.; Yifeng, Z.; Rong, L.; Shiwen, W.; Evrard, I.A. Pseudo-Equivalent Model for Sandwich Panels with Egg-Shaped Honeycomb-Grid Core. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2024, 276, 109360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Demircioğlu, U.; Bakır, H. Deep Learning-Based Prediction of Delamination Growth in Composite Structures: Bayesian Optimization and Hyperparameter Refinement. Phys. Scr. 2023, 98, 106004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koutoati, K.; Mohri, F.; Daya, E.M.; Carrera, E. A Finite Element Approach for the Static and Vibration Analyses of Functionally Graded Material Viscoelastic Sandwich Beams with Nonlinear Material Behavior. Compos. Struct. 2021, 274, 114315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yarasca, J.; Mantari, J.L. N-Objective Genetic Algorithm to Obtain Accurate Equivalent Single Layer Models with Layerwise Capabilities for Challenging Sandwich Plates. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 2017, 70, 170–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, N.; Zhang, D.-Q.; Liu, H.-T.; Li, T.-J. Optimal Design and Strength Reliability Analysis of Pressure Shell with Grid Sandwich Structure. Ocean Eng. 2021, 223, 108657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kovács, G.; Farkas, J. Optimal Design of a Composite Sandwich Structure. Sci. Eng. Compos. Mater. 2016, 23, 237–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, Y.; Yu, K.; Zhao, J.; Zhao, R. Experimental and Simulation Investigation of Temperature Effects on Modal Characteristics of Composite Honeycomb Structure. Compos. Struct. 2018, 201, 816–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Severson, P.; Camber, K.; El Hajjar, R. Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastics with Aluminum Honeycomb Core Design Methodology for Space and Surface Mining Applications. Acta Astronaut. 2022, 193, 721–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ASTM D7249/D7249M-20; Standard Test Method for Facesheet Properties of Sandwich Constructions by Long Beam Flexure. American Society for Testing and Materials: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2020.
- Zhu, Y.; Polyzos, E.; Pyl, L. Stiffness Optimisation of Sandwich Structures with Elastically Isotropic Lattice Core. Thin-Walled Struct. 2024, 195, 111408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meng, L.; Qiu, X.; Gao, T.; Li, Z.; Zhang, W. An Inverse Approach to the Accurate Modelling of 3D-Printed Sandwich Panels with Lattice Core Using Beams of Variable Cross-Section. Compos. Struct. 2020, 247, 112363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, M.; Zeng, T.; Wu, R.; Cui, Y.; Xu, G.; Wang, X.; Cheng, S.; Zhao, J. Bending Behaviors of 3D Printed Sandwich Structures with Functionally Graded Porous Lattice Cores. Thin-Walled Struct. 2025, 206, 112655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Atabakhshian, V.; Ghareghashi, A. Topology Optimization of Lattice-Core Sandwich Beams for Energy Absorption. J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 2023, 45, 465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nasrullah, A.I.H.; Santosa, S.P.; Dirgantara, T. Design and Optimization of Crashworthy Components Based on Lattice Structure Configuration. Structures 2020, 26, 969–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hooshmand, M.J.; Sakib-Uz-Zaman, C.; Khondoker, M.A.H. Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Mechanical Stiffness of Lattice Structure-Based Polymer Foam. Materials 2023, 16, 7173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daynes, S.; Feih, S.; Lu, W.F.; Wei, J. Design Concepts for Generating Optimised Lattice Structures Aligned with Strain Trajectories. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 2019, 354, 689–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hwang, J.T.; Steeves, C.A. Optimization of 3D Lattice Cores in Composite Sandwich Structures. J. Compos. Mater. 2015, 49, 2041–2055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiang, J.; Tao, J.; Yang, F.; Li, H.; Chen, X.; Lin, Y.; Yuan, L. Joint Interface Optimization of All-CFRTP Composite Honeycomb Prepared by Ultrasonic Multi-Spot Welding. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2024, 248, 110456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajput, A.; Sunny, M.R.; Sarkar, A. Optimization of Honeycomb Parameters of Sandwich Composites for Energy and Specific Energy Absorption Using Particle Swarm Optimization. Mar. Struct. 2023, 92, 103498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vakilifard, A.; Mazaheri, H.; Shaban, M. Bending Behavior and Geometrical Optimization of Five-Layered Corrugated Sandwich Panels with Equal in-Plane Principal Stiffness. J. Compos. Mater. 2022, 56, 2739–2753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, S.; Zhou, H. Analysis and Optimisation of Parameters Influencing the Out-of-Plane Energy Absorption of an Aluminium Honeycomb. Thin-Walled Struct. 2015, 89, 169–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, S.; Zhang, K.; Jin, L.; Gao, Q.; Liao, W.-H. Efficient Data Driven Optimization Framework for Designing B-Spline Honeycombs with Excellent Energy Absorption. Thin-Walled Struct. 2025, 209, 112941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, T.; Liu, Z.; Li, S.; Lei, J. Dynamic Response and Optimal Design of Aluminum Foam Sandwich Circular Tubes with V-Shaped Constraint under Lateral Blast Loading. Structures 2025, 71, 108117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ebrahimi, S.; Vahdatazad, N. Multiobjective Optimization and Sensitivity Analysis of Honeycomb Sandwich Cylindrical Columns under Axial Crushing Loads. Thin-Walled Struct. 2015, 88, 90–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sadegh Yazdi, M.; Hosseinzadeh, M.H.; Nadimi, V.; Hajitabar, A. Experimental, Numerical and Optimization Investigation of Sandwich Structures with 3D-Printed Sacrificial Core under Explosive Loading. Mater. Today Commun. 2024, 41, 111073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, H.; Han, C.; Yang, L.; Zhang, L.; Luan, H.; Han, P.; Xu, H.; Zhang, S. Numerical Investigation on Performance Optimization of Offshore Sandwich Blast Walls with Different Honeycomb Cores Subjected to Blast Loading. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohammed Sahib, M.; Szávai, S.; Kovács, G. Optimization of Elastic Properties of Composite Honeycomb Core by Finite Element Method. Acad. J. Manuf. Eng. 2021, 19, 78–85. [Google Scholar]
- LI, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Liu, C.; Liu, Q.; Sun, L.; Wang, J. A Novel Method to Eliminate the Bending-Induced Collapse of Hexagonal Honeycomb. Chin. J. Aeronaut. 2023, 36, 262–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kerche, E.F.; Kairytė, A.; Członka, S.; da Silva, A.A.X.; Tonatto, M.L.P.; Bresolin, F.L.; Delucis, R.D.A.; Amico, S.C. Optimization of Pin Position and Angle for Z-Pin-Reinforced Foam Core Sandwich Structures. Materials 2023, 16, 352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Djamaluddin, F. Optimization of Free Vibration for Sandwich Foam Core. Int. J. Mech. 2023, 17, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Q.; Yang, X.; Li, P.; Huang, G.; Feng, S.; Shen, C.; Han, B.; Zhang, X.; Jin, F.; Xu, F.; et al. Bioinspired Engineering of Honeycomb Structure—Using Nature to Inspire Human Innovation. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2015, 74, 332–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheini Dashtgoli, D.; Taghizadeh, S.; Macconi, L.; Concli, F. Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Predicting the Mechanical Behavior of Bio-Based Cellular Composite Sandwich Structures. Materials 2024, 17, 3493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zuccarello, B.; Bongiorno, F.; Militello, C. Structural Optimization of a High-Performance Green Sandwich Made of Sisal Reinforced Epoxy Facings and Balsa Core. Polymers 2024, 16, 3341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ribeiro Filho, S.L.M.; Tonatto, M.L.P.; Hallak Panzera, T.; Remillat, C.D.L.; Scarpa, F. Multi-Objective Optimisation of Aluminium Skins and Recycled/Perforated PET Foams Sandwich Panels Subjected to Impact Loads. Structures 2022, 43, 1750–1765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Omede’, B.; Grande, A.M. Parametric Optimization of Bio-Inspired Engineered Sandwich Core. Mater. Today Commun. 2024, 39, 108632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boccarusso, L.; De Fazio, D.; Myronidis, K.; Durante, M.; Pinto, F. Bio-Inspired Optimisation Design Strategy of Graded Hemp Core for Hybrid Carbon/Hemp Sandwich Laminates. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2024, 135, 2811–2827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, H.; Yang, X.; Yan, Q.; Xiang, Z.; Xu, S. Crashworthiness Analysis and Multiobjective Optimization of Bio-Inspired Sandwich Structure under Impact Load. Thin-Walled Struct. 2022, 172, 108840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hao, J.; Wu, X.; Oporto, G.; Liu, W.; Wang, J. Structural Analysis and Strength-to-Weight Optimization of Wood-Based Sandwich Composite with Honeycomb Core under Three-Point Flexural Test. Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod. 2020, 78, 1195–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gopalan, V.; Suthenthiraveerappa, V.; Tiwari, S.K.; Mehta, N.; Shukla, S. Dynamic Characteristics of a Honeycomb Sandwich Beam Made with Jute/Epoxy Composite Skin. Emerg. Mater. Res. 2020, 9, 132–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Duan, G.; Fang, Y.; Yin, X.; Li, W. Topology Optimization Based on the Improved High-Order RAMP Interpolation Model and Bending Properties Research for Curved Square Honeycomb Sandwich Structures. Compos. Struct. 2025, 351, 118643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Larsson, J.; Göransson, P.; Wennhage, P. A Topology and Sizing Optimisation Method for Lightweight Sandwich Structures Subject to Dynamic and Static Constraints. Compos. Struct. 2024, 348, 118442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Larsson, J.; Göransson, P.; Wennhage, P. A Sequential Mixed-Integer Programming Method for Concurrent Optimization of Core Topology and Face Sheet Thickness of a Sandwich Beam. J. Sandw. Struct. Mater. 2023, 25, 666–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, M.; Liu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Gao, L.; Gao, J.; Chu, S. Design of Graded Lattice Sandwich Structures by Multiscale Topology Optimization. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 2021, 384, 113949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.; Li, S.; Wang, Z. Multiscale Concurrent Topology Optimization and Mechanical Property Analysis of Sandwich Structures. Materials 2024, 17, 6086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ding, Z.; Zou, Z.; Zhang, L.; Li, X.; Zhang, Y. Multi-Scale Topological Design of Asymmetric Porous Sandwich Structures with Unidentical Face Sheets and Composite Core. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 2024, 422, 116839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chu, S.; Gao, L.; Xiao, M.; Li, H. Design of Sandwich Panels with Truss Cores Using Explicit Topology Optimization. Compos. Struct. 2019, 210, 892–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quang, V.D.; Quan, T.Q.; Tran, P. Static Buckling Analysis and Geometrical Optimization of Magneto-Electro-Elastic Sandwich Plate with Auxetic Honeycomb Core. Thin-Walled Struct. 2022, 173, 108935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abouhamzeh, M.; Sadighi, M. Buckling Optimisation of Sandwich Cylindrical Panels. Curved Layer. Struct. 2016, 3, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schultz, M.R.; Sleight, D.W.; Myers, D.E.; Waters, W.A.; Chunchu, P.B.; Lovejoy, A.E.; Hilburger, M.W. Buckling Design and Imperfection Sensitivity of Sandwich Composite Launch-Vehicle Shell Structures. In Proceedings of the American Society for Composites: Thirty-First Technical, Williamsburg, VA, USA, 19–21 September 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Njim, E.K.; Bakhy, S.H.; Al-Waily, M. Optimisation Design of Functionally Graded Sandwich Plate with Porous Metal Core for Buckling Characterisations. Pertanika J. Sci. Technol. 2021, 29, 3113–3141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, J.; Li, H.; Wang, H.; Zhang, H.; Cao, H.; Wang, X.; Han, Q. Optimal Design of Vibration Resistance of Fiber-Reinforced Composite Sandwich Plates Embedded in a Viscoelastic Square Honeycomb Core. Appl. Math. Model. 2025, 137, 115731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, C.; Zhou, Y.; Fan, Y.; Wang, X. Dynamic Characteristics of Novel Damping Sandwich Composite Open Cylindrical Shell: From Theory to Simulation. Thin-Walled Struct. 2024, 197, 111657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Z.; Yao, N.; Li, H.; Chu, C.; Sun, X.-C.; Gu, D.-W.; Li, H.; Han, Q.-K.; Wen, B.-C. The Analysis and Prediction of Nonlinear Damping Characteristics of Partially Filled All-Composite Honeycomb-Core Sandwich Panels. Thin-Walled Struct. 2024, 205, 112463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, B.; Li, T.; Zhang, L.; Yu, K.; Zhao, R. Vibration and Response Behaviors of Composite Sandwich Cylindrical Shells with Corrugated-Honeycomb Blended Cores in Inhomogeneous Thermal Environments. Thin-Walled Struct. 2024, 205, 112454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, Y.; Kang, W.; Moon, J.; Kim, C.-W. Optimum Design of Sandwich Composite Structures under Various Dynamic Loads Using the Equivalent Static Load Method. Compos. Struct. 2022, 298, 115991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, Y.; Park, J. An Optimization of Composite Sandwich Structure with Passive Vibration Absorber for Vibration Suppression. J. Sandw. Struct. Mater. 2021, 23, 3717–3745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Madeira, J.F.A.; Araújo, A.L.; Mota Soares, C.M.; Mota Soares, C.A. Multiobjective Optimization for Vibration Reduction in Composite Plate Structures Using Constrained Layer Damping. Comput. Struct. 2020, 232, 105810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, Q.; Liu, Z.; Shi, J.; Wan, Y. Parametric Study of Dynamic Response of Sandwich Plate under Moving Loads. Thin-Walled Struct. 2018, 123, 82–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Cheng, X.; Fu, K.; Ye, L. Failure Characteristics and Multi-Objective Optimisation of CF/EP Composite Sandwich Panels under Edgewise Crushing. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2020, 183, 105829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiu, B.; Li, W.; Feng, C.; Qu, X.; Liu, H.; Li, X. Efficient Localisation of Impact Load for Composite Structure Based on Response Similarity Search and Optimisation. Exp. Mech. 2024, 64, 1311–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Han, G.; Liu, X.; Ren, Y.; Jiang, H. Flexural Behaviors and Failure Mechanisms of CFRP Sandwich Structures with Enhanced Dual-Phase Lattice Cores. Compos. Struct. 2024, 328, 117724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, J.; Liu, T.; Chen, L.; Pan, X.; Wang, J.; Zhu, S.; Li, W. Energy Dissipation Mechanism and Ballistic Characteristic Optimization in Foam Sandwich Panels against Spherical Projectile Impact. Def. Technol. 2024, 35, 108–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Costa, E.A.; Driemeier, L. Parametric Optimization Framework for Designing Sandwich Panels with Auxetic Core Subjected to Impact Load. Compos. Struct. 2024, 347, 118436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pandey, A.; Upadhyay, A.K.; Shukla, K.K. Multi-Objective Optimization of Geometrical Parameters of Composite Sandwich Panels with an Aluminum Honeycomb Core for an Improved Energy Absorption. Mech. Compos. Mater. 2023, 59, 45–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohan Kumar, T.S.; Joladarashi, S.; Kulkarni, S.M.; Doddamani, S. Optimization of Process Parameters for Ballistic Impact Response of Hybrid Sandwich Composites. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. 2023, 17, 1099–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, P.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, Y.; Hu, D. Investigation of Structural Energy Absorption Performance in 3D-Printed Polymer (Tough 1500 Resin) Materials with Novel Multilayer Thin-Walled Sandwich Structures Inspired by Peano Space-Filling Curves. Polymers 2023, 15, 4068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jiang, F.; Yang, S.; Qi, C.; Liu, H.-T.; Remennikov, A.; Pei, L.-Z. Blast Response and Multi-Objective Optimization of Graded Re-Entrant Circular Auxetic Cored Sandwich Panels. Compos. Struct. 2023, 305, 116494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, Q.; Li, L.; Jing, X.; Jiang, Y.; Yan, D. Impact Resistance Analysis and Multi-Objective Optimization of Polyurea-Coated Auxetic Honeycomb Sandwich Panels. Mater. Today Commun. 2023, 35, 105577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiu, W.; Liu, K.; Wang, J.; Gao, Z.G. Anti-Blast Performance Optimization Design of Corrugated Sandwich Structures Based on BP-GA Method; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2023; pp. 659–667. [Google Scholar]
- Torabizadeh, M.A.; Fereidoon, A. Applying Taguchi Approach to Design Optimized Effective Parameters of Aluminum Foam Sandwich Panels Under Low-Velocity Impact. Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. Mech. Eng. 2022, 46, 851–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, T.; Peng, Y.; Jinhao, Z.; Kun, L.; Renchuan, Y. Crashworthiness Optimization Method for Sandwich Plate Structure under Impact Loading. Ocean Eng. 2022, 250, 110870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alanbay, B.; Batra, R.C. Optimization of Blast Mitigating Sandwich Structures with Fiber-Reinforced Face Sheets and PVC Foam Layers as Core. Thin-Walled Struct. 2022, 179, 109721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shu, C.; Hou, S.; Zhang, Y.X.; Luo, Y. Crashworthiness Analysis and Optimization of Different Configurations Multi-Layered Corrugated Sandwich Panels under Crush Loading. J. Sandw. Struct. Mater. 2021, 23, 2901–2922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassan, N.M.; Bahroun, Z.; Mohamed, A.; Baker, A.; Jijakli, K.; Saqr, A. Designing an Impact Resistant Sandwich Panel Composite Using Struct Based Structures. Compos. Struct. 2021, 258, 113432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, E.; Li, Q.; Sun, G. Computational Analysis and Optimization of Sandwich Panels with Homogeneous and Graded Foam Cores for Blast Resistance. Thin-Walled Struct. 2020, 147, 106494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lurie, S.; Volkov-Bogorodskiy, D.; Solyaev, Y.; Koshurina, A.; Krasheninnikov, M. Impact Behavior of a Stiffened Shell Structure with Optimized GFRP Corrugated Sandwich Panel Skins. Compos. Struct. 2020, 248, 112479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lan, X.-K.; Huang, Q.; Zhou, T.; Feng, S.-S. Optimal Design of a Novel Cylindrical Sandwich Panel with Double Arrow Auxetic Core under Air Blast Loading. Def. Technol. 2020, 16, 617–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, D.; Jing, L.; Yang, F. Optimal Design of Sandwich Panels with Layered-Gradient Aluminum Foam Cores under Air-Blast Loading. Compos. Part B Eng. 2019, 166, 169–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Xu, X.; Sun, G.; Lai, X.; Li, Q. Nondeterministic Optimization of Tapered Sandwich Column for Crashworthiness. Thin-Walled Struct. 2018, 122, 193–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Zhao, W.; Zhou, G.; Wang, C. Analysis and Parametric Optimization of a Novel Sandwich Panel with Double-V Auxetic Structure Core under Air Blast Loading. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2018, 142–143, 245–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Fu, K.; Hou, S.; Han, X.; Ye, L. Multi-Objective Optimization for Designing a Composite Sandwich Structure under Normal and 45° Impact Loadings. Compos. Part B Eng. 2018, 142, 159–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baroutaji, A.; Gilchrist, M.D.; Smyth, D.; Olabi, A.G. Analysis and Optimization of Sandwich Tubes Energy Absorbers under Lateral Loading. Int. J. Impact Eng. 2015, 82, 74–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, J.; Hu, J.; Li, J.; Li, Y.; Gan, N.; Tao, M.; Cao, W. Smooth Topological Design of Lightweight Vibro-Acoustic Sandwich Structures by Maximizing Sound Transmission Loss. Appl. Acoust. 2025, 228, 110347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.-S.; He, M.-X.; Ding, Q. Multi-Objective Topology Optimization of Sandwich Lattice Structures for Vibration Suppression: Numerical and Experimental Investigations. J. Vib. Eng. Technol. 2024, 12, 6015–6029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, Y. Using The Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II For Multi-Objective Optimization of Acoustic Performance in Sandwich Panels with Cellular Honeycomb Core. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. 2025, 28, 335–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Subramanian, J.; Selvaraj, V.K.; Singh, R.; S, I.; Kakur, N.; Whenish, R. Acoustical Properties of a 3D Printed Honeycomb Structure Filled with Nanofillers: Experimental Analysis and Optimization for Emerging Applications. Def. Technol. 2024, 35, 248–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, X.; Weng, H.; Ding, Q.; Liu, Y.; Li, M.; Lu, X. Design and Optimization of Low-Frequency Broadband Acoustic Absorption Structures Based on Multi-Cellular Element Co-Coupling. Appl. Acoust. 2024, 224, 110098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, F.L.; Wang, Y.P.; Zhu, Y. Sound Absorption and Optimization of Microperforated Sandwich Plates with Hybrid Core. Mech. Solids 2024, 59, 2644–2655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, J.; Liu, Z.; Wang, Q.; Zhao, Y.; Fard, M.; Davy, J.L. Optimization of the Acoustic Performance of a Composite Multi-Cell Sound Absorber. Acoust. Aust. 2023, 51, 319–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Xiao, X.; Zhang, Y.; Tang, Z.; Pan, A. Acoustic Optimization Design of Porous Materials on Sandwich Panel under Flow-Induced Vibration. Int. J. Aeroacoustics 2023, 22, 60–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mazloomi, M.S.; Ranjbar, M. Hybrid Design Optimization of Sandwich Panels with Gradient Shape Anti-Tetrachiral Auxetic Core for Vibroacoustic Applications. Transp. Porous Media 2022, 142, 5–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ren, L.; Yang, H.; Liu, L.; Zhai, C.; Song, Y. Sound Insulation of Corrugated-Core Sandwich Panels: Modeling, Optimization and Experiment. Materials 2021, 14, 7785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Araújo, A.L.; Madeira, J.F.A. Multiobjective Optimization Solutions for Noise Reduction in Composite Sandwich Panels Using Active Control. Compos. Struct. 2020, 247, 112440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Melo Filho, N.G.R.; Villanueva, M.C.; Sangiuliano, L.; Claeys, C.; Deckers, E.; Desmet, W. Optimisation Based Design of a Metamaterial Foam Core Sandwich Panel with In-Core Resonators; Institute of Noise Control Engineering: Wakefield, MA, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, H.; Li, H.; Zheng, H. A Structural-Acoustic Optimization of Two-Dimensional Sandwich Plates with Corrugated Cores. J. Vib. Control 2017, 23, 3007–3022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, X.-M.; Jiang, Y.-P.; Lee, H.-P.; Chen, N. Sound Insulation Performance Optimization of Lightweight Sandwich Panels. J. Vibroeng. 2016, 18, 2574–2586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galgalikar, R.; Thompson, L.L. Design Optimization of Honeycomb Core Sandwich Panels for Maximum Sound Transmission Loss. J. Vib. Acoust. 2016, 138, 051005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, Y.; Hussain, I.; He, S. Structural Topology Optimization of Aircraft Wing Leading Edge Fabricated of Multilayer Composites. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 2025, 159, 109993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rekatsinas, C.S.; Dimitriou, D.K.; Chrysochoidis, N.A. A Road Map to the Structural Optimization of a Type-C Composite UAV. Aerospace 2024, 11, 211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morovat, F.; Mozaffari, A.; Roshanian, J.; Zare, H. A Novel Aspect of Composite Sandwich Fairing Structure Optimization of a Two-Stage Launch Vehicle (Safir) Using Multidisciplinary Design Optimization Independent Subspace Approach. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 2019, 84, 865–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meddaikar, Y.M.; Dillinger, J.K.S.; Silva, G.H.C.; De Breuker, R. Skin Panel Optimization of the Common Research Model Wing Using Sandwich Composites. J. Aircr. 2022, 59, 386–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, H.; Zhou, D.; Shen, B.; Ding, Y. Lightweight Design of Solar UAV Wing Structures Based on Sandwich Equivalent Theory. Int. J. Aerosp. Eng. 2021, 2021, 6752410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, Y.S.; Park, C. Multi-Disciplinary Optimization of Wing Sandwich Structure Using Proper Orthogonal Decomposition and Automatic Machine Learning. Int. J. Aeronaut. Space Sci. 2021, 22, 1085–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Ouyang, X.; Yin, H.; Yu, X. Structural-Optimization Strategy for Composite Wing Based on Equivalent Finite Element Model. J. Aircr. 2016, 53, 351–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- An, H.; Chen, S.; Huang, H. Optimal Design of Composite Sandwich Structures by Considering Multiple Structure Cases. Compos. Struct. 2016, 152, 676–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shirvani, S.M.N.; Gholami, M.; Afrasiab, H.; Talookolaei, R.A.J. Optimal Design of a Composite Sandwich Panel with a Hexagonal Honeycomb Core for Aerospace Applications. Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. Mech. Eng. 2023, 47, 557–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-fatlawi, A.; Jármai, K.; Kovács, G. Optimal Design of a Fiber-reinforced Plastic Composite Sandwich Structure for the Base Plate of Aircraft Pallets in Order to Reduce Weight. Polymers 2021, 13, 834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martínez, X.; Pons-Prats, J.; Turon, F.; Coma, M.; Barbu, L.G.; Bugeda, G. Multi-Objective Multi-Scale Optimization of Composite Structures, Application to an Aircraft Overhead Locker Made with Bio-Composites. Mathematics 2023, 11, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, J.; Zhou, G.; Qiao, Y. Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of Sandwich-Structured Radomes. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 2019, 233, 179–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Sukhon, A.; ElSayed, M.S.A. Design Optimization of Hopper Cars Employing Functionally Graded Honeycomb Sandwich Panels. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part F J. Rail Rapid Transit 2022, 236, 920–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamble, M.; Shakfeh, T.; Moheimani, R.; Dalir, H. Optimization of a Composite Monocoque Chassis for Structural Performance: A Comprehensive Approach. J. Fail. Anal. Prev. 2019, 19, 1252–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ASTM D7136; Standard Test Method for Measuring the Damage Resistance of a Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composite to a Drop-Weight Impact Event. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2005.
- Sahib, M.M.; Kovács, G. Elaboration of a Multi-Objective Optimization Method for High-Speed Train Floors Using Composite Sandwich Structures. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 3876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, S.; Li, H.; Yang, C.; Yao, S. Crashworthiness Optimisation of a Composite Energy-Absorbing Structure for Subway Vehicles Based on Hybrid Particle Swarm Optimisation. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 2018, 58, 2291–2308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoon, H.G.; Lee, J.W. Optimum Core Design to Improve Noise Attenuation Performance and Stiffness of Sandwich Panels Used for High-Speed Railway Vehicles. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 2017, 55, 723–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Molavitabrizi, D.; Laliberte, J. Methodology for Multiscale Design and Optimization of Lattice Core Sandwich Structures for Lightweight Hopper Railcars. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 2020, 234, 4224–4238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salmani, H.; Khalkhali, A.; Ahmadi, A. Multi-Objective Optimization of Vehicle Floor Panel with a Laminated Structure Based on V-Shape Development Model and Taguchi-Based Grey Relational Analysis. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 2022, 65, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, R.; Wang, X.; Zhang, M.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, L. Application of Dimension Reduction Based Multi-Parameter Optimization for the Design of Blast-Resistant Vehicle. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 2017, 56, 903–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pratomo, A.N.; Santosa, S.P.; Gunawan, L.; Widagdo, D.; Putra, I.S. Design Optimization and Structural Integrity Simulation of Aluminum Foam Sandwich Construction for Armored Vehicle Protection. Compos. Struct. 2021, 276, 114461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohammed Sahib, M.; Kovács, G. Multi-Objective Optimization of Composite Sandwich Structures Using Artificial Neural Networks and Genetic Algorithm. Res. Eng. 2024, 21, 101937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fadlallah, S.O.; Anderson, T.N.; Nates, R.J. Artificial Neural Network–Particle Swarm Optimization (ANN-PSO) Approach for Behaviour Prediction and Structural Optimization of Lightweight Sandwich Composite Heliostats. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2021, 46, 12721–12742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Namvar, A.R.; Vosoughi, A.R. Design Optimization of Moderately Thick Hexagonal Honeycomb Sandwich Plate with Modified Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization by Genetic Algorithm (MOPSOGA). Compos. Struct. 2020, 252, 112626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, P.; Bin, L.; Vescovini, R.; Zheng, S. Optimal Design of Composite Sandwich Panel with Auxetic Reentrant Honeycomb Using Asymptotic Equivalent Model and PSO Algorithm. Compos. Struct. 2024, 328, 117761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kermani, A.; Ehsani, A. Multi-Objective Optimization of a Sandwich Structure with a Hybrid Composite Grid Core. Adv. Struct. Eng. 2023, 26, 137–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brendon Francisco, M.; Luiz Junho Pereira, J.; Simões Da Cunha, S.; Ferreira Gomes, G. Design Optimization of a Sandwich Composite Tube with Auxetic Core Using Multiobjective Lichtenberg Algorithm Based on Metamodelling. Eng. Struct. 2023, 281, 115775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wong, Y.J.; Mustapha, K.B.; Shimizu, Y.; Kamiya, A.; Arumugasamy, S.K. Development of Surrogate Predictive Models for the Nonlinear Elasto-Plastic Response of Medium Density Fibreboard-Based Sandwich Structures. Int. J. Lightweight Mater. Manuf. 2021, 4, 302–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kheirikhah, M.M. Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm Optimization of Composite Sandwich Plates Using a Higher-Order Theory. J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 2020, 42, 523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, J.; Fu, J.; Shang, C.; Lin, Z.; Li, B. Sandwich Panel Design and Performance Optimization Based on Triply Periodic Minimal Surfaces. CAD Comput. Aided Des. 2019, 115, 307–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, H.-T.; Wang, H.; Chen, X.-H. Optimization of Multi-Sandwich-Panel Composite Structures for Minimum Weight with Strength and Buckling Considerations. Sci. Eng. Compos. Mater. 2018, 25, 229–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Montemurro, M.; Catapano, A.; Doroszewski, D. A Multi-Scale Approach for the Simultaneous Shape and Material Optimisation of Sandwich Panels with Cellular Core. Compos. Part B Eng. 2016, 91, 458–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gholami, M.; Alashti, R.A.; Fathi, A. Optimal Design of a Honeycomb Core Composite Sandwich Panel Using Evolutionary Optimization Algorithms. Compos. Struct. 2016, 139, 254–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ilyani Akmar, A.B.; Kramer, O.; Rabczuk, T. Multi-Objective Evolutionary Optimization of Sandwich Structures: An Evaluation by Elitist Non-Dominated Sorting Evolution Strategy. Am. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2015, 8, 185–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, L.; Lin, H.; Wei, L.; Han, C.; Xu, H.; Karampour, H. Application of a Novel Machine Learning Model for the Prediction and Optimization of Anti-Blast Performance of Sandwich Honeycomb Blast Walls. Ocean Eng. 2024, 312, 119217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bohara, R.P.; Linforth, S.; Thai, H.-T.; Nguyen, T.; Ghazlan, A.; Ngo, T. Multi-Objective Bulk Scale Optimisation of an Auxetic Structure to Enhance Protection Performance. Eng. Struct. 2023, 280, 115729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santosa, S.P.; Widagdo, D.; Pratomo, A.N. Design and Multi-Objective Optimization of Auxetic Sandwich Panels for Blastworthy Structures Using Machine Learning Method. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 10831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mallick, M.; Chakrabarty, A.; Khutia, N. Genetic Algorithm Based Design Optimization of Crashworthy Honeycomb Sandwiched Panels of AA7075-T651 Aluminium Alloy for Aerospace Applications. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 54, 690–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamarian, S.; Khalvandi, A.; Heidarizadi, E.; Saber-Samandari, S.; Song, J. Prediction and Optimization of 3D-Printed Sandwich Beams with Chiral Cores. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2024, 262, 108747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, S.; Sheng, Y.; Feng, S.; Jian Lu, T. Heat Transfer Efficiency of Hierarchical Corrugated Sandwich Panels. Compos. Struct. 2021, 272, 114195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, S.; Sheng, Y.; Ren, J.; Jin, F.; Feng, S. Multi-Objective Optimization of Active Cooling and Compressive Load-Bearing Performance of Truss-Cored Sandwich Panel Using Genetic Algorithm. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2025, 236, 126404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, Y.; Sun, X.; Chen, B.; Ni, H. Optimal Design of Periodic Honeycomb Plate with Unit Cell Structure Based on Genetic Algorithm. Mob. Inf. Syst. 2022, 2022, 5145935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, Z. Optimization of the Free Vibrations of Doubly-Curved Sandwich Panels Using the Artificial Bee Colony Optimization Algorithm. Multiscale Multidiscip. Model. Exp. Des. 2024, 7, 607–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, X.; Jiang, Y.; Pueh Lee, H. Multi-Objective Optimal Design of Sandwich Panels Using a Genetic Algorithm. Eng. Optim. 2017, 49, 1665–1684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Objective Functions | Design Constraints | Design Variables |
---|---|---|
Min. weight Min. cost Max. specific energy absorption Min. transmitted load Max. sound transmission loss, etc. | Total deflection (e.g., tip deflection, twist angle, etc.) Total buckling load Facesheet buckling load Core shear buckling load Facesheet stress Stiffener stress Stiffener web buckling load Eigenfrequency Bending stiffness Torsional stiffness, etc. | Facesheet thickness Number of plies in the facesheet Thickness of plies Fiber orientation in the layers (unidirectional or bidirectional ply) Stacking sequence in the laminate Fiber material (Carbon/Glass/Kevlar fiber) Core thickness Core material (Nomex honeycomb, Al/Polyurethane foam), etc. |
Classification | Explanation/Examples |
---|---|
Combinatorial methods | Each variable takes one of a finite set of values, e.g., linear programming. |
Deterministic optimization | The problem is well defined in analytical form and a unique solution is possible, e.g., hill climbing. |
Stochastic algorithms | Quasi-optimal solutions are possible based on a random search, e.g., mathematical programming, ant colony optimization, immune system methods, memetic algorithms, scatter search and path relinking, particle swarm, GAs, differential algorithms. |
Mixed algorithms | Combine the best features of deterministic and stochastic algorithms. Work as a black box, e.g., chaotic neural networks. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Sadiq, M.A.; Kovács, G. Optimization of Composite Sandwich Structures: A Review. Machines 2025, 13, 536. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines13070536
Sadiq MA, Kovács G. Optimization of Composite Sandwich Structures: A Review. Machines. 2025; 13(7):536. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines13070536
Chicago/Turabian StyleSadiq, Muhammad Ali, and György Kovács. 2025. "Optimization of Composite Sandwich Structures: A Review" Machines 13, no. 7: 536. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines13070536
APA StyleSadiq, M. A., & Kovács, G. (2025). Optimization of Composite Sandwich Structures: A Review. Machines, 13(7), 536. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines13070536