1. Introduction and Motivation
For a complex number
s, Dirichlet’s beta function is defined by the alternating infinite series [
1]
When setting
, it becomes Catalan’s constant
G, expressed as
which was introduced by Eugène Charles Catalan in [
2] (Equation (
4)). There are many other famous representations of
G (see [
3,
4,
5]), for example,
Recently, Stewart [
6] and Holland [
7] proposed, respectively, the following problems requiring proof:
where
denotes the Riemann zeta function,
Motivated by these two elegant formulae, we primarily investigate, in this paper, the following integrals involving trigonometric and hyperbolic functions with an integer parameter
n:
Deriving explicit formulae involving trigonometric and hyperbolic functions is important for accurate computations in combinatorics, physics, computer science, and other fields. This study not only fills the gap in the literature for these types of integrals but also serves as a good inspiration for computing similar definite integrals.
To evaluate these integrals, we first give the following two lemmas (cf. [
8] ([1.5.44 and 1.2.2])). And throughout the paper,
indicates that “
m is congruent to
n modulo
j”.
denotes the logical function defined by
and
.
Lemma 1. For each , we have the representationwhere Proof. By means of the trigonometric function relations
we can rewrite the integral as
Setting
, we have
Letting
, we obtain
By means of the Fourier series [
9] (Equation (1.7.1))
we obtain
Thus, we can evaluate the integral
Keeping in mind the formula
we can evaluate the integral
which completes the proof. □
Letting in the above lemma, we can obtain the following corollary.
The Beta function
is defined by the following integral [
9] (Equation (1.1.12)):
Replacing
z by
in (
8), we have an infinite integral representation of
:
The Gamma function
is defined by [
9] (Equation (1.1.18))
which is closely related to the Beta function. In fact, they satisfy the relation [
9] (Equation (1.1.13))
The following useful relationship between the Gamma and Circular functions [
9] (Equation (1.2.1)) is well known as Euler’s reflection formula:
Generally, for an integer
, by combining Equation (
10) and
, we can immediately obtain the following equations:
Lemma 2. For and , the following identity holds: Proof. Setting
, we can rewrite the integral as follows:
Then, the proof follows by means of (
9). □
The rest of this paper is organized as follows. In
Section 2, we calculate
and
. Then, in
Section 3, we compute
and
. Finally, in
Section 4, the paper ends with two integral equations.
2. Integrations and
In this section, we use the method of substitution and other techniques to evaluate the integrals and .
As a warm-up, we first calculate two particular cases,
and
:
Proof. Making the replacement
, we have
which leads us to
By setting
and using (
13), the inner integral can be evaluated as
Therefore, by making use of (
1) and (
11), we have
□
Proof. Setting
, we can manipulate the integral as follows:
By replacing
by
z and then using (
11) and (
13), we can compute the inner integral:
which leads us to
By means of Formulae (
1) and (
4), we can evaluate the first integral:
For the second integral, by making the replacement
, we obtain
Then, replacing
t by
, the second integral in “( )” leads to
And replacing
t by
, the third integral in “( )” gives
Introducing them into the above equation and making use of (
1) and (
4), we have
According to the above results, we can obtain the formula stated in the theorem. □
Generally, for an integer , we have the following theorem.
Theorem 5. For each , we have the representationwhere Proof. Setting
, we can compute the integral
Letting
, the inner integral can be evaluated:
where
which completes the proof. □
For a given parameter
, by making use of Lemma 1 and Theorem 5, we can evaluate the definite integral
whose results can be expressed in terms of
, Catalan’s constant
G, and Dirichlet’s beta function
. For instance, setting
, we have the following formula:
Proof. By setting
in Theorem 5, we have
where
By means of variable replacement and (
1), (
4), and (
6), we can ascertain that
which completes the proof. □
Similarly, we can establish the following formula for the integral .
Theorem 6. For each , we have the representationwhere Proof. Letting
, we have
which yields
Setting
and using (
12), the inner integral can be rewritten as
where
which concludes the proof. □
Proof. Letting
in Theorem 6, we have
Letting
and making use of (
1) and (
2), we obtain
□
The above formula resolves the problem proposed by Stewart [
6].
Proof. Letting
in Theorem 6, we have
By means of variable replacement, we can ascertain that
Then, the proof follows by making use of (
1), (
2), (
5), (
6), and (
7). □
3. Integrations and
In this section, by making use of the method of substitution and integrating by parts, as well as other techniques, we will compute the integrals and .
First of all, we compute two simple cases,
and
:
Proof. For the second integral, integrating by parts, we can rewrite it as
Obviously, it is not difficult to obtain
where the second limit can be evaluated by means of L’Hospital’s rule. Then, by making the replacement
, we have
Therefore, we can rewrite the integral as
In addition, replacing
y by
yields
which leads us to
Then, the proof follows by using Corollary 3 and resolves the problem proposed recently by Holland [
7]. □
Proof. Replacing
by
t, we have
by means of which we obtain
By letting
and using (
13), the inner integral can be rewritten as
Therefore, the integral can be rewritten as
Letting
and then using (
1), (
2), (
4), and (
5), the first integral on the right-hand side can be rewritten as
Setting
, the second integral on the right-hand side can be rewritten as
where
Letting
and then using (
1), (
2), (
4), and (
5), we have
Similarly, by setting
and
, we can obtain
and
respectively. Based on the above results, we can confirm the first formula. □
Proof. Integrating by parts, we can rewrite it as
Replacing
x by
, we have
which completes the proof by using Theorem 8. □
Generally, for an integer , we have the following formula.
Theorem 10. For each , we have the representationwhere Proof. Integrating by parts, we can rewrite the integral as
Obviously, it is not difficult to obtain
where the second limit can be evaluated by means of L’Hospital’s rule.
Letting
, we can evaluate
which yields
By setting
, the above integral becomes
Then, letting
, the inner integral can be evaluated as
Therefore, we obtain
where
which completes the proof. □
For a given integer , we can evaluate based on the above Theorem 10 and Lemma 1.
Proof. By means of the relation
and Corollary 3 and the formula of Theorem 8, we can obtain the desired formula. □
Proof. Integrating by parts two times, we can manipulate the integral:
Letting
, we have
which leads us to
Then, the proof follows by means of the first identities of Corollary 3 and Theorem 8. □
Generally, for any integer , we have the following theorem.
Proof. Similar to the proof of Theorem 11, integrating by parts two times, we obtain
By making the replacement
, we have
By making use of Theorem 10, we can complete the proof. □
4. Conclusions
In this paper, by means of the method of substitution and integration by parts, integrals containing trigonometric and hyperbolic functions are transformed into integrals of rational fractions or into known integrals, and by employing Beta and Gamma functions, we then derive their explicit results. The methods have been shown to be efficient in dealing with the types of definite integrals mentioned in previous sections, and it is possible to derive more similar formulae. For instance, we can obtain the following identity:
Finally, we point out that, for two integers
and
, we have
In fact, setting
, we have
The integrand
is an odd function, so the value of the integral is 0.
In this paper, we focus on the computation of four types of definite integrals whose results can be expressed in terms of special functions, such as Dirichlet’s beta function, Riemann’s zeta function, and Catalan’s constant. Our results not only provide methods for the computation of similar definite integrals but also are important for the study of Dirichlet’s beta function, Riemann’s zeta function, and Catalan’s constant.
Author Contributions
Writing—review and editing, Y.C.; Methodology and review, D.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work is supported by the Zhoukou Normal University high-level talents start-up funds research project, China, ZKNUC2022007.
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this manuscript.
Acknowledgments
The authors are sincerely grateful to the anonymous referees for their valuable suggestions, which contributed significantly to improving the manuscript. The authors would like to thank the Zhoukou Normal University high-level talents start-up funds research project, China, ZKNUC2022007.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
References
- Rivoal, T.; Zudilin, W. Diophantine properties of numbers related to Catalan’s constant. Math. Ann. 2003, 326, 705–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Catalan, E. Mémoire sur la transformation des séries et sur quelques intégrales définies. Mém. Acad. R. Sci. Belg. 1865, 33, 1–50. [Google Scholar]
- Bradley, D.M. Representations of Catalan’s Constant. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/2325473 (accessed on 8 July 2023).
- Cvijović, D. Closed-form evaluation of some families of cotangent and cosecant integrals. Integral Transform. Spec. Funct. 2008, 19, 147–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferretti, F.; Gambini, A.; Ritelli, D. Identities for Catalan’s constant arising from integrals depending on a parameter. Acta Math. Sin. 2020, 36, 1083–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stewart, S. Problem 12317. Am. Math. Mon. 2022, 129, 385–394. [Google Scholar]
- Holland, F. Problem 12332. Am. Math. Mon. 2022, 129, 587–596. [Google Scholar]
- Prudnikov, A.P.; Brychkov, Y.A.; Marichev, O.I. Integrals and Series, Volume 1. Elementary Functions; Gordon & Breach Science Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 1986. [Google Scholar]
- Andrews, G.E.; Askey, R.; Roy, R. Special Functions; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
| Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).