Abstract
The regularity of the n-P-V-rings and n-P-V’-rings is systematically investigated in this paper. Employing the notions of quasi-ideals, weakly left (or right) ideals, and generalized weak ideals, we focus on investigating the strong -regularity and weak -regularity of the n-P-V-rings and the n-P-V’-rings. Subsequently, we demonstrate our results as follows: (1) is strongly -regular if is a left n-P-V-ring where all its maximal left ideals are either quasi-ideals, weakly right ideals, or generalized weak ideals. (2) is strongly -regular iff is an abelian left (right) n-P-V’-ring where all its maximal essential left (right) ideals are either quasi-ideals, weakly right (left) ideals, or generalized weak ideals. (3) is reduced left weakly -regular if is an idempotent reflexive semi-abelian left n-P-V’-ring where all its maximal essential left ideals are either quasi-ideals, weakly right ideals, or generalized weak ideals.
Keywords:
n-P-V-rings; n-P-V’-rings; left weakly π-regular; strongly π-regular; n-P-injective modules MSC:
16D50; 16E50
1. Introduction
Von Neumann first introduced the notion of regular rings in 1936 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS). He defined a regular ring as one in which, for any element , there exists an element such that . Due to their desirable algebraic properties, investigating the regularity of von Neumann regular rings has become a significant area of study [1,2,3,4].
Since Eckmann and Schopf introduced the notion of injective modules in 1953, injectivity has become a powerful tool in ring and module theory [5]. Notably, Kaplansky demonstrated that a commutative ring is a von Neumann regular iff all its simple -modules are injective (i.e., is defined as a V-ring) [6], establishing a strong connection between V-rings and the regular rings.
However, the focus in ring theory often shifts to noncommutative and associative rings. For such rings, the relationship between regularity and injectivity becomes more intricate. In 1973, Michler and Villamayor showed that the conditions relating to V-rings and von Neumann regular rings in the noncommutative setting are neither sufficient nor necessary [7]. This result underscores the complex and intriguing interplay between these two classes of rings in the noncommutative context.
As one of the generalizations of injective modules, Zhang and Wu presented the notion of P-injective modules in the literature [8] and used P-injective modules to investigate von Neumann regular rings, which naturally led to the notion of P-V-rings. A further study in the literature [9] demonstrates that the P-injective module is weakened, and the concept of a GP-injective module is obtained. As a result, the notion of V-rings has been generalized to include GP-V-rings and GP-V’-rings. Right (left) GP-V-rings, where every simple right (left) -module is a GP-injective module, have been studied in [10], while right (left) GP-V’-rings, where any simple singular right (left) -module is a GP-injective module, have been characterized in [11]. In recent years, the regularity of GP-V-rings and GP-V’-rings has attracted significant attention from many mathematicians (cf. [12,13]).
In 2004, Mao introduced the notion of n-P-injective modules and n-P-rings [14]. A left -module is said to be left n-P-injective if there exists a positive integer such that, for any , any module homomorphism from to can be extended to a module homomorphism from to . It is evident that a left 1-P-injective module must be a type of left P-injective module. Any left P-injective module must also be a left n-P-injective module, and any left n-P-injective module must be a left GP-injective module; however, the converse statements do not necessarily hold. Thus, left n-P-injective modules lie between left P-injective modules and left GP-injective modules, representing a proper generalization of left P-injective modules.
In [15], Kim was the first to introduce the concept of idempotent reflexive rings. However, no research has been conducted on idempotent reflexive n-P-V’-rings and their regularity properties until now. This paper addresses this gap by systematically examining the regularity of idempotent reflexive n-P-V’-rings.
The organization of this paper is as follows. Section 2 introduces pertinent lemmas and definitions relevant to this study. Section 3 delves into the investigation of the strong -regularity and weak -regularity of the n-P-V-rings and the n-P-V’-rings. Section 4 gives the conclusions of the paper and prospects for future research.
2. Preliminaries
We begin by presenting several definitions and lemmas to provide a clearer foundation for the results that follow.
Definition 1
([15]). The left ideal of the ring is idempotent reflexive if implies for and every idempotent of . The ring is an idempotent reflexive ring if implies for and every idempotent of .
It is clear that semiprime rings and abelian rings all possess idempotent reflexivity. However, Kim [15] provided an example showing that a ring with idempotent reflexivity is not necessarily reflexive.
Definition 2.
The ring is said to be semi-commutative if for every and .
Definition 3.
The ring is said to be semi-abelian iff either or for all and every .
Definition 4.
The ring is said to be reduced if the ring contains no nonzero nilpotent elements.
Definition 5.
Let be a ring and be an additive semigroup of the ring . If there is a positive integer satisfying for all , then the additive semigroup is said to be a weakly right (left) ideal.
Definition 6.
Let be a ring and be a right (left) ideal of . If there is a positive integer such that for all , then the right (left) ideal is called a generalized weak ideal.
Definition 7.
Let be a ring and be an additive semigroup of . If for , then the additive semigroup is called a quasi-ideal.
Definition 8
([14]). The ring R is said to be a left (right) n-P-V-ring if there is a positive integer n such that any simple left (right) -module is n-P-injective.
Definition 9.
The ring R is said to be a left (right) n-P-V’-ring if there is a positive integer n satisfying any simple singular left (right) -module is n-P-injective.
Definition 10.
The ring R is said to be a -regular ring if there is a positive integer and c satisfying for all .
In 2002, Tuganbaev [16] introduced the notion of strongly -regular rings.
Definition 11.
The ring R is a strongly -regular ring if there is a positive integer m and a satisfying for all .
Clearly, when , a -regular ring is simply a regular ring, thus the -regular ring is a generalization of the regular ring. Tuganbaev pointed out in the literature [16] that a strongly -regular ring is unequivocally a -regular ring, but a -regular ring does not invariably qualify as strongly -regular; consequently, a regular ring is not necessarily strongly -regular.
Definition 12.
The ring R is a left weakly -regular ring if there is a positive integer m satisfying for all .
Since n-P-injective modules form a class of injective modules that lie between P-injective modules and GP-injective modules, it follows that, under similar conditions, n-P-V-rings and n-P-V’-rings typically exhibit better properties than GP-V-rings and GP-V’-rings. Based on this observation, we explore the regularity theorems related to GP-V’-rings as discussed in [13] and conclude that n-P-V-rings and n-P-V’-rings demonstrate a stronger regularity under the same conditions.
The subsequent discussion focuses on the regularity of n-P-V-rings and n-P-V’-rings. To derive the relevant theorems, we initially provide several preliminary lemmas.
Lemma 1.
is a reduced ring if is an idempotent reflexive semi-abelian left n-P-V’-ring where all its maximal essential left ideals are quasi-ideals.
Proof.
Let there be a nonzero element satisfying , then we can get . Hence, there is a maximal left ideal of the ring containing , and it is evident that is an essential ideal. Indeed, if is not an essential ideal, is a direct sum term of the ring and , in which is an idempotent of the ring and then . Given that the ring is semi-abelian, we deduce that , indicating Hence, which contradicts the assumption. Thus is an essential ideal and . We define
and it is clear that qualifies as a well-defined left -module homomorphism. By assumption, is a left n-P-injective module, so there is an element satisfying
where . Considering that is a left ideal and a quasi-ideal, we have
Therefore, we derive
Thus, . This is in conflict with the maximality of . Therefore, is a reduced ring. □
Lemma 2.
The ring is reduced if is an idempotent reflexive semi-abelian left n-P-V’-ring where all its maximal essential left ideals are weakly right ideals.
Proof.
Let there be a nonzero element satisfying , then we can get . Hence, there is a maximal left ideal of the ring containing , and it is evident that is an essential ideal. Indeed, if is not an essential ideal, is a direct sum term of the ring and , in which is an idempotent of the ring and then . Given that the ring is semi-abelian, we deduce that , indicating . Hence, which contradicts the assumption. Thus, is an essential ideal and . We define
It is clear that qualifies as a well-defined left -module homomorphism. By assumption, is a left n-P-injective module, so there is an element satisfying
where . Considering that is both a left ideal and a weakly right, there exists a positive integer satisfying . Therefore, we derive
Thus . This is in conflict with the maximality of . Hence, the ring is reduced. □
Lemma 3.
The ring R is reduced if is an idempotent reflexive semi-abelian left n-P-V’-ring where all its maximal essential left ideals are generalized weak ideals.
Proof.
Let there be a nonzero element satisfying , then we can get . Hence, there is a maximal left ideal of the ring containing , and it is evident that is an essential ideal. Indeed, if is not an essential ideal, is a direct sum term of the ring and , in which is an idempotent of the ring and then . Given that the ring is semi-abelian, we deduce that , indicating . Hence, which contradicts the assumption. Thus is an essential ideal and . We define
It is clear that qualifies as a well-defined left -module homomorphism. By assumption, is a left n-P-injective module, so there is an element satisfying
where . Considering that is a left ideal, we have . In consideration of is a generalized weak ideal, there is a positive integer satisfying . Therefore, we can derive
Given that is a left ideal of the ring , we have . Thus, . This is in conflict with the maximality of . Hence, is a reduced ring. □
3. Main Results
We first investigated the regularity of n-P-V-rings. Under the condition that “all its maximal left ideals are generalized weak ideals”, we proved that the left n-P-V-ring is strongly -regular.
Theorem 1.
is a strongly -regular ring if is a left n-P-V-ring where all its maximal left ideals are generalized weak ideals.
Proof.
Suppose there is an element c satisfying . Then the ring contains a maximal left ideal satisfying . Thus, is a simple left -module. Given that every maximal left ideal of the ring is a generalized weak ideal and , we have for all . We define the following left -module homomorphism as:
Based on the assumption, is a left n-P-injective module, so there is an element satisfying
and it is obvious that
Since , and is a generalized weak ideal of the ring , then there is a positive integer satisfying . Thus, we obtain
Continuing this process, we can obtain . Since , this is in conflict with the maximality of . Therefore, we derive for all . Thus, there exists and such that
Hence, the ring is strongly -regular. □
The substitution of “generalized weak ideals” with “weakly right ideals” does not alter the conclusion of Theorem 1.
Theorem 2.
is a strongly -regular ring if is a left n-P-V-ring where all its maximal left ideals are weakly right ideals.
Proof.
Suppose there is an element c satisfying . Then the ring contains a maximal left ideal such that . Therefore, is a simple left -module. Since all maximal left ideals of the ring are weakly right ideals and , we have for all . We define the following left -module homomorphism as:
Based on this assumption, is a left n-P-injective module, so there is an element satisfying
It is obvious . Since is a weakly right ideal and a left ideal, there is a positive integer satisfying . Therefore, we can derive
Thus, we obtain
which is in conflict with the maximality of . Therefore, we derive for all . Thus, there exists and such that
Hence, the ring is strongly -regular. □
The substitution of “weakly right ideals” with “quasi-ideals” does not alter the conclusion of Theorem 2.
Theorem 3.
is a strongly -regular ring if is a left n-P-V-ring in which all its maximal left ideals are quasi-ideals.
Proof.
Suppose there is an element c satisfying . Then the ring contains a maximal left ideal such that . Thus, is a simple left -module. Since all maximal left ideals of the ring are quasi-ideals and , we have for all . We define the following left -module homomorphism as:
Based on this assumption, is a left n-P-injective module, so there is an element satisfying
and it is obvious that . Since , and is a quasi-ideal and a left ideal, we derive
Hence,
and thus, we obtain . This is in conflict with the maximality of the ideal . Therefore, we derive for all . Thus, there exists and such that
Hence, is strongly -regular. □
In the following, we start to study the regularity of the n-P-V’-rings, and we first present three equivalent conditions for the n-P-V’-rings to be strongly -regular.
Theorem 4.
The following statements are equivalent:
- (1)
- is a strongly -regular ring.
- (2)
- is an abelian left n-P-V’-ring in which all its maximal essential left ideals are quasi-ideals.
- (3)
- is an abelian right n-P-V’-ring in which all its maximal essential right ideals are quasi-ideals.
Proof.
(1) ⇒ (2) and (1) ⇒ (3) are trivial. Since (3) ⇒ (1) is similar to (2) ⇒ (1), we only need (2) ⇒ (1) in the following.
For (2) ⇒ (1): Suppose there is an element c satisfying . Then the ring contains a maximal left ideal such that
In the following, we prove that is essential. Otherwise, is a direct sum term of the ring , i.e., , where Then , so we have
Thus, . Noting that is abelian, so we obtain
Hence,
Thus, we obtain
which contradicts the hypothesis. Therefore, is an essential ideal of the ring , and is a simple singular left -module. Since all maximal essential left ideals of are quasi-ideals, and , we have for all . We define
It is clear that qualifies as a well-defined left -module homomorphism. By assumption, is an n-P-injective module, so there is satisfying
and it is obvious that . By the fact that is the left ideal, we have . Since , and is the left ideal, we obtain . Given that is a quasi-ideal, we derive
Thus,
Hence,
This is in conflict with the maximality of the ideal . Thus, we obtain for all . Therefore, is a strong -regular ring. □
Theorem 5.
The following statements are equivalent:
- (1)
- is a strongly -regular ring.
- (2)
- is an abelian left n-P-V’-ring in which all its maximal essential left ideals are weakly right ideals.
- (3)
- is an abelian right n-P-V’-ring in which all its maximal essential right ideals are weakly left ideals.
Proof.
(1) ⇒ (2) and (1) ⇒ (3) are trivial. Since (3) ⇒ (1) is similar to (2) ⇒ (1), we only need (2) ⇒ (1) in the following.
For (2) ⇒ (1): Suppose there is an element c satisfying . Then the ring contains a maximal left ideal such that
In the following, we prove that is essential. Otherwise, is a direct sum term of the ring , i.e., , where Then , so we have
and thus, . Noting that is abelian, so we obtain
Hence,
Thus, we obtain
which contradicts the hypothesis. Therefore, is an essential ideal, and is a simple singular left -module. Given that all maximal essential left ideals of are weakly right ideals, and , we derive for all . We define
It is clear that qualifies as a well-defined left -module homomorphism. By assumption, is an n-P-injective module, so there is satisfying
and it is obvious that . By the fact that is a weakly right ideal and a left ideal, there is a positive integer satisfying .
Noting that
We can obtain . This is in conflict with the maximality of the ideal . Thus, we derive for all . Therefore, is a strong -regular ring. □
Theorem 6.
The following are equivalent:
- (1)
- is a strongly -regular ring.
- (2)
- is an abelian left n-P-V’-ring where all its maximal essential left ideals are generalized weak ideals.
- (3)
- is an abelian right n-P-V’-ring where all its maximal essential right ideals are generalized weak ideals.
Proof.
(1) ⇒ (2) and (1) ⇒ (3) are trivial. Since (3) ⇒ (1) is similar to (2) ⇒ (1), we only need (2) ⇒ (1) in the following.
For (2) ⇒ (1): Suppose there is an element c satisfying . Then the ring contains a maximal left ideal such that
In the following, we prove that is essential. Otherwise, is a direct sum term of the ring , i.e., , where Then , so we have
Thus, . Noting that is abelian, so we obtain
Hence,
Thus, we obtain
which contradicts the hypothesis. Therefore is an essential ideal, and is a simple singular left -module. Given that all maximal essential left ideals of are generalized weak ideals, and , we have for all . We define
It is clear that qualifies as a well-defined left -module homomorphism. By assumption, is an n-P-injective module, so there is satisfying
It is obvious that
By the fact that is a generalized weak ideal and , there is a positive integer satisfying . Hence,
Continuing this process, we can obtain . Since , this is in conflict with the maximality of the ideal . Thus, we derive for all . Therefore, is a strong -regular ring. □
Subsequently, we specify three conditions that are sufficient to confer left weakly -regularity upon idempotent reflexive n-P-V’-rings.
Theorem 7.
is reduced left weakly -regular if is an idempotent reflexive semi-abelian left n-P-V’-ring where all its maximal essential left ideals are quasi-ideals.
Proof.
Suppose there is an element c satisfying . Then the ring contains a left ideal such that , and it is not hard to see that is an essential ideal. Indeed, if is not an essential ideal, is a direct sum term of the ring . Set , where . We have , indicating . Given that is an idempotent reflexive ring, we derive implying . Hence,
Thus, we have . This is in conflict with the assumption. Hence, is an essential ideal. By assumption, since is a left n-P-injective module, and all maximal essential left ideals of the ring are quasi-ideals, we have , and for all . We define
According to Lemma 1, is a reduced ring, so qualifies as a well-defined left -module homomorphism. Based on the assumption, is a left n-P-injective module, so there is satisfying
Hence, we have where . Since , and is a quasi-ideal and a left ideal, we derive
Hence,
since , and this is in conflict with the maximality of the ideal . Therefore, we derive for all . Therefore, is a reduced left weakly π-regular ring. □
Theorem 8.
is reduced left weakly -regular if is an idempotent reflexive semi-abelian left n-P-V’-ring where all its maximal essential left ideals are weakly right ideals.
Proof.
Suppose there is an element c such that . Then the ring contains a left ideal such that , and it is not hard to see that is an essential ideal. Indeed, if is not an essential ideal, is a direct sum term of the ring . Set , where and . We have , indicating . Given that is an idempotent reflexive ring, we derive implying . Hence,
and thus, we have . This is in conflict with the assumption. Hence, is an essential ideal. Based on the assumption, since is a left n-P-injective module, and all maximal essential left ideals of the ring are weakly right ideals, we have , and for all . We define
According to Lemma 2, is a reduced ring, so qualifies as a well-defined left -module homomorphism. Based on the assumption, is a left n-P-injective module, so there is satisfying
It’s obvious that . Since is a weakly right ideal and a left ideal, there is a positive integer satisfying . Therefore, we can derive
Thus, we obtain , . This is in conflict with the maximality of the ideal . Therefore, we derive for all . Therefore, is a reduced left weakly -regular ring. □
Theorem 9.
is reduced left weakly -regular if is an idempotent reflexive semi-abelian left n-P-V’-ring where all its maximal essential left ideals are generalized weak ideals.
Proof.
Suppose there is an element satisfying . Then the ring contains a left ideal satisfying , and it is not hard to see that is an essential ideal. Indeed, if is not an essential ideal, is a direct sum term of the ring . Set , where and . We have , indicating . Given that is an idempotent reflexive ring, we derive implying . Hence,
and thus, we have . This is in conflict with the assumption. Hence, is an essential ideal. Based on the assumption, since is a left n-P-injective module, and all maximal essential left ideals of the ring are generalized weak ideals, we have , and for all . We define
According to Lemma 3, is a reduced ring, so qualifies as a well-defined left -module homomorphism. Based on the assumption, is a left n-P-injective module, so there is satisfying
It is obvious that
Since , and is a generalized weak ideal, there is a positive integer satisfying . Thus, we obtain
Continuing this process, we can obtain . Since , this is in conflict with the maximality of the ideal . Hence, we derive for all . Therefore, is a reduced left weakly -regular ring. □
4. Conclusions and Prospects
This paper provides a comprehensive study of the regularity of n-P-V-rings and n-P-V’-rings. Utilizing the notions of quasi-ideals, weakly left/right ideals, and generalized weak ideals, the focus was primarily on investigating the strong -regularity and weak -regularity of n-P-V-rings and n-P-V’-rings.
Quasi-ideals, weakly left (or right) ideals, and generalized weak ideals are all extensions of the notion of ideals. According to the regularity theorems derived in this paper, it appears that these three entities can be interchanged under certain conditions. The deep intrinsic connections among these three types of ideals remain to be explored in future research.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, L.L. and W.Z.; methodology, L.L.; investigation, Y.L.; writing—original draft preparation, L.L. and W.Z.; and writing—review and editing, L.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the Doctoral/High-level Talents Research Foundation of Jinling Institute of Technology (No. jit-b-202043).
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
- Wang, Z.; Chen, J.; Khurana, D.; Lam, T.Y. Rings of idempotent stable range one. Algebras Represent. Theory 2012, 15, 195–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anderson, D.D.; Chun, S.; Juett, J.R. Module-theoretic generalization of commutative von Neumann regular rings. Commun. Algebra 2019, 47, 4713–4728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Danchev, P.V. A generalization of π-regular rings. Turk. J. Math. 2019, 43, 702–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Danchev, P.V. A symmetric generalization of π-regular rings. Ric. Mat. 2024, 73, 179–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roger, Y.C.M. On von Neumann regular rings-II. Math. Scand. 1976, 39, 167–170. [Google Scholar]
- Kaplansky, I. Commutative rings. In Conference on Commutative Algebra; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1973; pp. 153–166. [Google Scholar]
- Michler, G.O.; Villamayor, O.E. On rings whose simple modules are injective. J. Algebra 1973, 25, 185–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.L.; Wu, J. Generalizations of principal injectivity. Algebra Colloq. 1999, 6, 277–282. [Google Scholar]
- Roger, Y.C.M. On regular rings and Artinian rings (II). Riv. Math. Univ. Parma 1985, 4, 101–109. [Google Scholar]
- Roger, Y.C.M. On injektivity, P-injektivity and YJ-injektivity. Acta Math. Univ. Comen. 2004, 73, 141–149. [Google Scholar]
- Wisbauer, R. Foundations of Module and Ring Theory; Routledge: London, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Jeong, J.; Kwak, T.K. On rings whose essential maximal right ideals are GP-injective. Commun. Korean Math. Soc. 2022, 37, 399–407. [Google Scholar]
- Li, L.W.; Zou, W.L.; Li, Y. Regularity of idempotent reflexive GP-V’-rings. Mathematics 2024, 12, 3265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mao, L.X. On n-P-injective modules. Coll. Math. 2004, 20, 49–53. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, J.Y. Certain rings whose simple singular modules are GP-injective. Proc. Jpn. Acad. 2005, 81, 125–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tuganbaev, A.A. Semiregular weakly regular and π-regular rings. J. Math. Sci. 2002, 109, 1509–1537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).