Next Article in Journal
Stability Results for the Darboux Problem of Conformable Partial Differential Equations
Next Article in Special Issue
Sharp Coefficient Bounds for a Subclass of Bounded Turning Functions with a Cardioid Domain
Previous Article in Journal
New Results on Boas–Bellman-Type Inequalities in Semi-Hilbert Spaces with Applications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Equivalent Base Expansions in the Space of Cliffordian Functions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Applications of Shell-like Curves Connected with Fibonacci Numbers

1
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Technology, Irbid National University, Irbid 21110, Jordan
2
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, College of Science, IMSIU (Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University), Riyadh 11566, Saudi Arabia
3
Faculty of Science, Department of Mathematics, Al al-Bayt University, Mafraq 25113, Jordan
4
Department of Applied Science, Ajloun College, Al-Balqa Applied University, Ajloun 26816, Jordan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Axioms 2023, 12(7), 639; https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms12070639
Submission received: 13 May 2023 / Revised: 19 June 2023 / Accepted: 26 June 2023 / Published: 28 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Complex Analysis and Applications)

Abstract

:
We introduce a new subclass J Σ η , δ , μ ( p ˜ ) of bi-univalent functions, defined by shell-like curves connected with Fibonacci numbers. Our main results in this paper include estimates of the Taylor–Maclaurin coefficients a 2 and a 3 for functions in this subclass, as well as solutions to Fekete–Szegö functional problems. We also show novel outcomes resulting from the specialization of the parameters used in our main results.

1. Introduction

The Fibonacci numbers form a sequence of integers, which are defined recursively as follows: F 0 = 0 , F 1 = 1 , and for n 2 ,   F n = F n 1 + F n 2 . In other words, each term is the sum of the two preceding terms [1]. The first few terms of the sequence are: 0 , 1 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 5 , 8 , 13 , 21 , 34 , 55 , The Fibonacci numbers have many interesting properties and applications. For example, they appear in the growth patterns of various biological structures, such as branching in trees and the arrangement of leaves on a stem. They also appear in various mathematical and scientific contexts, such as number theory, geometry, and physics. The Fibonacci sequence can be generated in many ways, including using matrix multiplication, generating functions, and various combinatorial methods. The sequence has many interesting properties and relationships with other mathematical objects, such as the golden ratio, Lucas numbers, and Pell numbers.
Shell-like curves are a family of mathematical curves that are inspired by the shapes of shells found in nature. These curves are characterized by their smooth, spiraling shapes, which can be generated using simple mathematical equations.
One well-known example of a shell-like curve is the logarithmic spiral, which is a type of spiral that increases or decreases in size as it rotates around a central point. The logarithmic spiral is often used to model various natural phenomena, such as the spiral growth patterns of shells, horns, and even galaxies.
Another type of shell-like curve is the Archimedean spiral, which is a spiral that is created by a point moving away from a fixed point with a constant speed along a line that rotates with constant angular velocity. This type of spiral is often used in engineering and design, as it allows for the creation of smooth, continuous curves with a consistent spacing between them.
Shell-like curves can also be generated using more complex mathematical equations, such as the Fibonacci spiral, which is a spiral that is created by connecting points along a Fibonacci sequence of rectangles. This type of spiral is often used in art and design, as it allows for the creation of visually striking patterns and shapes.
Overall, shell-like curves are a fascinating area of mathematical study with numerous applications in science, engineering, art, and design.
Let A be the class of functions f of the form
f ( z ) = z + a 2 z 2 + a 3 z 3 + ( z U ) .
which are analytic in the disk U = z : z < 1 and gratify the normalization condition f ( 0 ) 1 = 0 = f ( 0 ) . Moreover, we use S to denote the subclass of A comprising functions of Equation (1), which are also univalent in U .
Geometric function theory can benefit greatly from the powerful tools that the differential subordination of analytical functions provides. Miller and Mocanu [2] introduced the first differential subordination problem; additionally, see [3]. The majority of the developments in the field were compiled in Miller and Mocanu’s book [4], along with the publication dates.
Additionally, every function f A that is univalent in U will be represented as S . Therefore, each f S possesses an inverse denoted by f 1 , which is defined as follows:
f 1 ( f ( z ) ) = z ( z U )
and
f ( f 1 ( w ) ) = w ( w < r 0 ( f ) ; r 0 ( f ) 1 4 )
where
g ( w ) = f 1 ( w ) = w a 2 w 2 + ( 2 a 2 2 a 3 ) w 3 ( 5 a 2 3 5 a 2 a 3 + a 4 ) w 4 + .
A function f A is in the class Σ of all bi-univalent functions in U if both if both f ( z ) and f 1 ( z ) are univalent in U . For some fascinating facts of functions in the class Σ , see ([5,6,7,8,9]).
Lewin [10] is one of the first researchers who studied Bi-Univalent Functions, and recently, the researcher Illafe et al. [11] explored a new topic on Bi-Univalent Functions. In our paper, we studied and worked on the subordinate relationship between Fibonacci numbers and Shell-Like Curves and found a 2 , a 3 and Fekete–Szegö functional problems. In reference [11], the authors established a subordinate relationship between Gegenbauer polynomials and used a series based on the zero-truncated Poisson distribution. They also found a 2 , a 3 and Fekete–Szegö functional problems. My study, on the other hand, is considered an advancement and generalization of the work of many scientists, achieving notable results in this field.
Let B denote the class of functions of the form:
b ( z ) = 1 + b 1 z + b 2 z 2 + b 3 z 3 + ( z U )
which are analytic with R e b ( z ) > 0 . In this context, the function b ( z ) is referred to as Caratheodory functions [12]. b B iff b ( z ) = ( 1 + w ( z ) ) ( 1 w ( z ) ) , provided that a Schwarz function w exists. Recently, Sokół [13] and Dziok et al. [14] studied the classes SL ( b ˜ ) of shell-like functions, which are characterized by z f ( z ) f ( z ) b ˜ ( z ) and KSL ( b ˜ ) of convex shell-like functions characterized by 1 + z 2 f ( z ) f ( z ) b ˜ ( z ) , where b ˜ ( z ) = 1 + τ 2 z 2 1 τ z τ 2 z 2 ,   τ = 1 5 2 0.618 , see [15,16]. It is worth mentioning that the function b ˜ is not univalent in U but is univalent in the disc z < 3 5 2 0.38 . As equation τ 2 = 1 + τ is satisfied by τ , it is possible to express higher powers τ n as linear combinations of lower powers, ultimately leading to a linear combination of τ and 1. Using the recurrence relationships derived from this decomposition, one can obtain the Fibonacci numbers σ n .
τ n = σ n τ + σ n 1 .
Raina and Sokół [16] proved that
b ˜ ( z ) = 1 + τ 2 z 2 1 τ z τ 2 z 2 = 1 + n = 2 σ n 1 + σ n + 1 τ n z n ,
where
σ n = ( 1 τ ) n ( τ ) n 5 , τ = 1 5 2 , n = 1 , 2 , .
This demonstrates that:
σ 0 = 0 , σ 1 = 1 , σ n + 2 = σ n + σ n + 1 , n = 0 , 1 , 2 , .
Hence,
b ˜ ( z ) = 1 + n = 1 b n ˜ z n = 1 + ( σ 0 + σ 2 ) τ z + ( σ 1 + σ 3 ) τ 2 z 2 + n = 3 σ n 3 + σ n 2 + σ n 1 + σ n τ n z n = 1 + τ z + 3 τ 2 z 2 + 4 τ 3 z 3 + 7 τ 4 z 4 + 11 τ 5 z 5 + .
We note that the b ˜ B ( α ) with α = 5 10 0.2236 ; see [16].
Fibonacci numbers have been shown to be related to several polynomial families, such as Pell-Lucas polynomials, Gegenbauer polynomials, Chebyshev polynomials, Horadam polynomials, Fermat–Lucas polynomials, and their generalizations, which have applications in various fields, including physics, architecture, combinatorics, number theory, statistics, and engineering. Detailed information on these polynomials can be found in [17,18,19]. Moreover, the Fekete–Szegö functional, which is widely used for bi-univalent functions based on k-Fibonacci numbers, is discussed in ([20,21,22,23]).
A current research trend involves studying functions in the class Σ based on various polynomials such as Fibonacci, Pell–Lucas, Gegenbauer, Chebyshev, Horadam, and Fermat–Lucas polynomials, which have applications in fields such as physics, architecture, combinatorics, number theory, statistics, and engineering. Recent papers, such as ([24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37]), have focused on estimating the first two coefficient bounds and the functional of Fekete–Szegö for specific subfamilies of Σ .

2. Definitions

In this section, we introduce some new subclasses of bi-univalent functions to which the Fibonacci numbers are subordinate.
Definition 1. 
A function f ( z ) = z + a 2 z 2 + a 3 z 3 + J Σ κ , , γ ( b ˜ ) , where , κ 1 , γ C and R e ( γ ) 0 , if it satisfies:
( 1 κ ) f ( z ) + κ f ( z ) f ( z ) z γ 1 b ˜ ( z ) = 1 + τ 2 z 2 1 τ z τ 2 z 2 ( z U )
and for g given by Equation (2),
( 1 κ ) g ( w ) + κ g ( w ) g ( w ) w γ 1 b ˜ ( w ) = 1 + τ 2 w 2 1 τ w τ 2 w 2 ( w U ) ,
where τ = 1 5 2 0.618 .
Specializing the values of , κ and γ where τ = 1 5 2 , the class J Σ κ , , γ ( b ˜ ) reduces to various new subclasses. For example:
(i)
For κ = 1 , we can obtain the class J Σ 1 , , γ ( b ˜ ) = J Σ , γ ( b ˜ ) . A function f ( z ) = z + a 2 z 2 + a 3 z 3 + J Σ , γ ( b ˜ ) , where 1 , γ C and R e { γ } 0 , if satisfying:
f ( z ) f ( z ) z γ 1 b ˜ ( z ) = 1 + τ 2 z 2 1 τ z τ 2 z 2 ( z U )
and for g given by Equation (2)
g ( w ) g ( w ) w γ 1 b ˜ ( w ) = 1 + τ 2 w 2 1 τ w τ 2 w 2 ( w U ) .
(ii)
For κ = = 1 ; we get the class J Σ 1 , 1 , γ ( b ˜ ) = J Σ γ ( b ˜ ) . A function f ( z ) given by Equation (1) is said to be in the class J Σ γ ( b ˜ ) , where γ C and R e { γ } 0 if satisfying:
f ( z ) f ( z ) z γ 1 b ˜ ( z ) = 1 + τ 2 z 2 1 τ z τ 2 z 2 ( z U )
and for g given by Equation (2)
g ( w ) g ( w ) w γ 1 b ˜ ( w ) = 1 + τ 2 w 2 1 τ w τ 2 w 2 ( w U ) .
(iii)
For κ = = γ = 1 ; we get the class J Σ 1 , 1 , 1 ( b ˜ ) = J Σ ( b ˜ ) . A function f ( z ) = z + a 2 z 2 + a 3 z 3 + J Σ ( b ˜ ) , if the satisfied:
f ( z ) b ˜ ( z ) = 1 + τ 2 z 2 1 τ z τ 2 z 2 ( z U )
and for g given by Equation (2)
g ( w ) b ˜ ( w ) = 1 + τ 2 w 2 1 τ w τ 2 w 2 ( w U ) .
(iv)
For κ = 1 and = 1 , we get the class J Σ 1 , 1 , γ ( b ˜ ) = J Σ 1 , γ ( b ˜ ) . A function f ( z ) = z + a 2 z 2 + a 3 z 3 + J Σ 1 , γ ( b ˜ ) , where γ C and R e { γ } 0 , if it satisfies:
f ( z ) f ( z ) z γ 1 b ˜ ( z ) = 1 + τ 2 z 2 1 τ z τ 2 z 2 ( z U )
and for g given by (2)
g ( w ) g ( w ) w γ 1 b ˜ ( w ) = 1 + τ 2 w 2 1 τ w τ 2 w 2 ( w U ) .
(v)
For κ = 1 and γ = 1 , we get the class J Σ 1 , , 1 ( b ˜ ) = J Σ , 1 ( b ˜ ) . A function f ( z ) = z + a 2 z 2 + a 3 z 3 + J Σ , γ ( b ˜ ) , where 1 , and R e { γ } 0 , if satisfied:
f ( z ) b ˜ ( z ) = 1 + τ 2 z 2 1 τ z τ 2 z 2 ( z U )
and for g given by (2)
g ( w ) b ˜ ( w ) = 1 + τ 2 w 2 1 τ w τ 2 w 2 ( w U ) .
(vi)
For γ = 1 , we get the class J Σ κ , ( b ˜ ) . A function f ( z ) = z + a 2 z 2 + a 3 z 3 + J Σ ( b ˜ ) , where 1 , if it satisfies:
( 1 κ ) f ( z ) + κ f ( z ) b ˜ ( z ) = 1 + τ 2 z 2 1 τ z τ 2 z 2 ( z U )
and for g given by (2),
( 1 κ ) g ( w ) + κ g ( w ) b ˜ ( w ) = 1 + τ 2 w 2 1 τ w τ 2 w 2 ( w U ) ,
We need the following lemma to prove our results.
Lemma 1 
([38]). If b B , then b i 2 for each i , where b ( z ) = 1 + b 1 z + b 2 z 2 + b 3 z 3 + .

3. Coefficient Bounds and Fekete–Szegö Inequality

In the following theorem, we discuss the coefficient estimate and Fekete–Szegö inequality for functions in the class J Σ κ , , γ ( b ˜ ) .
Theorem 1. 
Let f ( z ) given by Equation (1) be in the function class J Σ κ , , γ ( b ˜ ) , where , κ 1 , γ C and R e { γ } 0 . Then,
a 2 2 χ τ , a 3 τ χ + 2 τ ( κ 3 + γ 4 + 3 ) κ 3 + γ 4 + 3 χ
and for ε R
a 3 ε a 2 2 τ κ 3 + γ 4 + 3 ; 0 j ε τ 4 κ 3 + γ 4 + 3 4 j ε ; j ε τ 4 κ 3 + γ 4 + 3 ,
where
χ = κ τ γ + 2 γ 3 + 4 γ 1 + 2 ( 2 + 1 ) + 6 τ + 2 ( 1 3 τ ) ( κ 2 + γ 3 + 2 ) 2
and j ε = ( 1 ε ) τ 2 2 χ .
Proof. 
Since f J Σ κ , , γ ( b ˜ ) , from Equations (17) and (18), we have:
( 1 κ ) f ( z ) + κ f ( z ) f ( z ) z γ 1 = b ˜ ( s ( z ) )
and for f 1 = g ,
( 1 κ ) g ( w ) + κ g ( w ) g ( w ) w γ 1 = b ˜ ( r ( w ) ) .
Using the fact that b b ˜ and b ( z ) = 1 + b 1 z + b 2 z 2 + b 3 z 3 + . Then, there exists a function s A such that | s ( z ) | < 1 in U and b ( z ) = b ˜ ( s ( z ) ) . Therefore, define the function
t ( z ) = 1 + s ( z ) 1 s ( z ) = 1 + s 1 z + s 2 z 2 + .
Note that t ( z ) B . It follows that
s ( z ) = t ( z ) 1 t ( z ) + 1 = s 1 2 z + s 2 s 1 2 2 z 2 2 + s 3 s 1 s 2 + s 1 3 4 z 3 2 +
and
b ˜ ( s ( z ) ) = 1 + b ˜ 1 s 1 2 z + s 2 s 1 2 2 z 2 2 + s 3 s 1 s 2 + s 1 3 4 z 3 2 + + b ˜ 2 s 1 2 z + s 2 s 1 2 2 z 2 2 + s 3 s 1 s 2 + s 1 3 4 z 3 2 + 2 + b ˜ 3 s 1 2 z + s 2 s 1 2 2 z 2 2 + s 3 s 1 s 2 + s 1 3 4 z 3 2 + 3 + = 1 + b ˜ 1 s 1 2 z + 1 2 s 2 s 1 2 2 b ˜ 1 + s 1 2 4 b ˜ 2 z 2 + 1 2 s 3 s 1 s 2 + s 1 3 4 b ˜ 1 + s 1 2 s 2 s 1 2 2 b ˜ 2 + s 1 3 8 b ˜ 3 z 3 +
Similarly, function r A exists, such that | r ( w ) | < 1 in U and b ( w ) = b ˜ ( r ( w ) ) . Therefore, the function
d ( w ) = 1 + r ( w ) 1 r ( w ) = 1 + r 1 w + r 2 w 2 + .
is in the class B . It follows that
r ( w ) = d ( w ) 1 d ( w ) + 1 = r 1 2 w + r 2 r 1 2 2 w 2 2 + r 3 r 1 r 2 + r 1 3 4 w 3 2 +
and
b ˜ ( r ( w ) ) = 1 + b ˜ 1 r 1 2 w + r 2 r 1 2 2 w 2 2 + r 3 r 1 r 2 + r 1 3 4 w 3 2 + + b ˜ 2 r 1 2 w + r 2 r 1 2 2 w 2 2 + r 3 r 1 r 2 + r 1 3 4 w 3 2 + 2 + b ˜ 3 r 1 2 w + r 2 r 1 2 2 w 2 2 + r 3 r 1 r 2 + r 1 3 4 w 3 2 + 3 + = 1 + b ˜ 1 r 1 2 w + 1 2 r 2 r 1 2 2 b ˜ 1 + r 1 2 4 b ˜ 2 w 2 + 1 2 r 3 r 1 r 2 + r 1 3 4 b ˜ 1 + r 1 2 r 2 r 1 2 2 b ˜ 2 + r 1 3 8 b ˜ 3 w 3 + .
By virtue of Equations (21)–(24), we have
κ 2 + γ 3 + 2 a 2 = s 1 τ 2 ,
κ γ 1 γ 2 2 + 2 γ 1 + 2 ( 1 ) a 2 2 + κ 3 + γ 4 + 3 a 3 = 1 2 s 2 s 1 2 2 τ + 3 s 1 2 4 τ 2 ,
κ 2 + γ 3 + 2 a 2 = r 1 τ 2
and
κ γ 2 γ + 3 2 + 2 γ 1 + 2 ( + 2 ) 4 + 6 a 2 2 κ 3 + γ 4 + 3 a 3 = 1 2 r 2 r 1 2 2 τ + 3 r 1 2 4 τ 2 .
From Equations (25) and (27), we get
s 1 = r 1
and
2 κ 2 + γ 3 + 2 2 a 2 2 = ( s 1 2 + r 1 2 ) τ 2 4 .
Adding Equations (26) to (28), we have
κ γ + 2 γ 3 + 4 γ 1 + 2 ( 2 + 1 ) + 6 a 2 2 = 1 2 ( s 2 + r 2 ) τ 1 4 ( s 1 2 + r 1 2 ) τ + 3 4 ( s 1 2 + r 1 2 ) τ 2 .
By substituting Equations (30) in (31), we can obtain
a 2 2 = ( s 2 + r 2 ) τ 2 2 κ τ γ + 2 γ 3 + 4 γ 1 + 2 ( 2 + 1 ) + 6 τ + 2 ( 1 3 τ ) ( κ 2 + γ 3 + 2 ) 2
Now, using Lemma 1, we have
a 2 2 τ κ τ γ + 2 γ 3 + 4 γ 1 + 2 ( 2 + 1 ) + 6 τ + 2 ( 1 3 τ ) ( κ 2 + γ 3 + 2 ) 2 .
Next, by subtracting Equations (28) from (26), we get
a 3 = ( s 2 r 2 ) τ 4 ( κ 3 + γ 4 + 3 ) + a 2 2 .
Hence, by Lemma 1, we get
a 3 ( s 2 + r 2 ) τ 4 ( κ 3 + γ 4 + 3 ) + a 2 2 τ κ 3 + γ 4 + 3 + a 2 2 .
Using Equation (33), we obtain
a 3 τ χ + 2 τ κ 3 + γ 4 + 3 κ 3 + γ 4 + 3 χ ,
where
χ = κ τ γ + 2 γ 3 + 4 γ 1 + 2 ( 2 + 1 ) + 6 τ + 2 ( 1 3 τ ) ( κ 2 + γ 3 + 2 ) 2 .
From Equation (34) , we have
a 3 ε a 2 2 = ( s 2 r 2 ) τ 4 ( κ 3 + γ 4 + 3 ) + ( 1 ε ) a 2 2 .
By substituting Equations (32) in (35), we have
a 3 ε a 2 2 = ( s 2 + r 2 ) τ 4 ( κ 3 + γ 4 + 3 ) + ( 1 ε ) ( s 2 r 2 ) τ 2 2 χ = j ε + τ 4 ( κ 3 + γ 4 + 3 ) s 2 + j ε τ 4 ( κ 3 + γ 4 + 3 ) r 2 ,
where j ε = ( 1 ε ) τ 2 2 χ .
Taking the modulus of Equation (36), we can obtain
a 3 ε a 2 2 τ κ 3 + γ 4 + 3 ; 0 j ε τ 4 κ 3 + γ 4 + 3 4 j ε ; j ε τ 4 κ 3 + γ 4 + 3 .

4. Corollaries and Consequences

In this section, we provide special cases for the subclasses of J Σ κ , , γ ( b ˜ ) .
Corollary 1. 
Let f ( z ) = z + a 2 z 2 + a 3 z 3 + be in the function class J Σ , γ ( b ˜ ) , where 1 , γ C and R e { γ } 0 . Then
a 2 2 χ 1 τ , a 3 τ χ 1 + 2 τ ( 3 + γ 4 + 3 ) 3 + γ 4 + 3 χ 1 ,
and for ε R
a 3 ε a 2 2 τ 3 + γ 4 + 3 ; 0 j ε τ 4 3 + γ 4 + 3 4 j ε ; j ε τ 4 3 + γ 4 + 3 ,
where
χ 1 = τ γ + 2 γ 3 + 4 γ 1 + 2 ( 2 + 1 ) + 6 + 2 ( 1 3 τ ) ( 2 + γ 3 + 2 ) 2 ,
and j ε = ( 1 ε ) τ 2 2 χ 1 .
Corollary 2. 
Let f ( z ) = z + a 2 z 2 + a 3 z 3 + be in the function class J Σ γ ( b ˜ ) , where γ C and R e { γ } 0 . Then
a 2 2 χ 2 τ , a 3 τ χ 2 + 2 τ ( γ + 2 ) ( γ + 2 ) χ 2 ,
and for ε R
a 3 ε a 2 2 τ γ + 2 ; 0 j ε τ 4 γ + 2 4 j ε ; j ε τ 4 γ + 2 ,
where
χ 2 = 2 ( γ + 1 ) 2 γ + 1 5 γ + 4 τ ,
and j ε = ( 1 ε ) τ 2 2 χ 2 .
Corollary 3. 
Let f ( z ) = z + a 2 z 2 + a 3 z 3 + be in the function class J Σ ( b ˜ ) . Then
a 2 τ 4 9 τ , a 3 2 ( 2 3 τ ) τ 3 ( 4 9 τ ) ,
and for ε R
a 3 ε a 2 2 τ 3 ; 0 j ε τ 12 4 j ε ; j ε τ 12 ,
where j ε = ( 1 ε ) τ 2 4 ( 4 9 τ ) .
Corollary 4. 
Let f ( z ) = z + a 2 z 2 + a 3 z 3 + be in the function class J Σ 1 , γ ( b ˜ ) , where γ C and R e { γ } 0 . Then,
a 2 2 χ 1 τ , a 3 τ χ 1 + 2 τ ( γ + 2 ) γ + 2 χ 1 ,
and for ε R
a 3 ε a 2 2 τ γ 1 + 3 ; 0 j ε τ 4 γ + 2 4 j ε ; j ε τ 4 γ + 2 ,
where
χ 1 = τ γ + 2 γ 3 + 4 γ 1 + 12 + 2 ( 1 3 τ ) ( γ + 1 ) 2 ,
and j ε = ( 1 ε ) τ 2 2 χ 1 .
Corollary 5. 
Let f ( z ) = z + a 2 z 2 + a 3 z 3 + be in the function class J Σ , 1 ( b ˜ ) , where 1 . Then,
a 2 2 χ 1 τ , a 3 τ χ 1 + 2 τ ( 3 3 + 3 ) 3 3 + 3 χ 1 ,
and for ε R
a 3 ε a 2 2 τ 3 3 + 3 ; 0 j ε τ 4 3 3 + 3 4 j ε ; j ε τ 4 3 3 + 3 ,
where
χ 1 = τ 2 ( 2 + 1 ) + 2 ( 1 3 τ ) ( 2 2 + 2 ) 2 ,
and j ε = ( 1 ε ) τ 2 2 χ 1 .
Corollary 6. 
Let f ( z ) = z + a 2 z 2 + a 3 z 3 + be in the function class J Σ κ , ( b ˜ ) , where 1 and κ 1 . Then,
a 2 2 χ τ , a 3 τ χ + 6 τ κ 3 κ χ
and for ε R
a 3 ε a 2 2 τ 3 κ ; 0 j ε τ 12 κ 4 j ε ; j ε τ 12 κ ,
where
χ = κ τ 6 + 2 ( 2 + 1 ) + 6 τ + 4 ( 1 3 τ ) ( κ ) 2
and j ε = ( 1 ε ) τ 2 2 χ .

5. Conclusions

In our research, we introduced a new subclass of normalized analytic functions and bi-univalent functions connected to the standardized shell-like curves connected with Fibonacci numbers, namely J Σ η , δ , μ ( p ˜ ) . We established estimates for the Taylor coefficients a 2 and a 3 and obtained solutions for Fekete–Szegö functional problems for functions that belong to this class. This study could potentially serve as a stimulus for further research on the creation of new classes of analytic and bi-univalent functions related to the Fibonacci numbers.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.A. and B.A.F.; methodology, A.A.; validation, T.A.-H., B.A.F. and I.A.; formal analysis, A.A.; investigation, A.A., B.A.F. and I.A.; writing-original draft preparation, B.A.F. and A.A.; writing-review and editing, A.A., T.A.-H. and I.A.; supervision, B.A.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Parberry, I. Problems on algorithms. ACM Sigact News 1995, 26, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Miller, S.S.; Mocanu, P.T. Second Order Differential Inequalities in the Complex Plane. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1978, 65, 289–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Miller, S.S.; Mocanu, P.T. Differential Subordinations and Univalent Functions. Mich. Math. J. 1981, 28, 157–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Miller, S.S.; Mocanu, P.T. Differential Subordinations. Theory and Applications; Marcel Dekker, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  5. Frasin, B.A.; Aouf, M.K. New subclass of bi-univalent functons. Appl. Math. Lett. 2011, 24, 1569–1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Srivastava, H.M.; Mishra, A.K.; Gochhayat, P. Certain subclasses of analytic and bi-univalent functions. Appl. Math. Lett. 2010, 23, 1188–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Yousef, F.; Al-Hawary, T.; Murugusundaramoorthy, G. Fekete-Szegö functional problems for some subclasses of bi-univalent functions defined by Frasin differential operator. Afr. Mat. 2019, 30, 495–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yousef, F.; Alroud, S.; Illafe, M. New subclasses of analytic and bi-univalent functions endowed with coefficient estimate problems. Anal. Math. Phys. 2010, 11, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yousef, F.; Frasin, B.A.; Al-Hawary, T. Fekete-Szegö inequality for analytic and bi-univalent functions subordinate to Chebyshev polynomials. Filomat 2018, 32, 3229–3236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lewin, M. On a coefficient problem for bi-univalent functions. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1967, 18, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Illafe, M.; Yousef, F.; Mohd, M.H.; Supramaniam, S. Initial coefficients estimates and Fekete-Szegö inequality problem for a general subclass of bi-univalent functions defined by subordination. Axioms 2023, 12, 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Duren, P.L. Univalent Functions; Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften Series; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1983; Volume 259. [Google Scholar]
  13. Sokół, J. On starlike functions connected with Fibonacci numbers. Folia Scient. Univ. Tech. Resoviensis 1999, 175, 111–116. [Google Scholar]
  14. Dziok, J.; Raina, R.K.; Sokól, J. Certain results for a class of convex functions related to a shell-like curve connected with Fibonacci numbers. Comp. Math. Appl. 2011, 61, 2605–2613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Dziok, J.; Raina, R.K.; Sokól, J. On α-convex functions related to a shell-like curve connected with Fibonacci numbers. Appl. Math. Comput. 2011, 218, 996–1002. [Google Scholar]
  16. Raina, R.K.; Sokól, J. Fekete-Szegö problem for some starlike functions related to shell-like curves. Math. Slovaca 2016, 66, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Filipponi, P.; Horadam, A.F. Derivative sequences of Fibonacci and Lucas polynomials. In Applications of Fibonacci Numbers; Bergum, G.E., Philippou, A.N., Horadam, A.F., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1990; Volume 4, pp. 99–108. [Google Scholar]
  18. Filipponi, P.; Horadam, A.F. Second derivative sequence of Fibonacci and Lucas polynomials. Fibonacci Quart. 1993, 31, 194–204. [Google Scholar]
  19. Wang, T.-T.; Zhang, W.-P. Some identities involving Fibonacci, Lucas polynomials and their applications. Bull. Math. Soc. Sci. Math. Roum. 2012, 55, 95–103. [Google Scholar]
  20. Güney, H.Ö. Coefficient bounds for analytic bi-Bazilevič functions related to shell-like curves connected with Fibonacci numbers. Sahand Commun. Math. Anal. 2019, 16, 149–160. [Google Scholar]
  21. Güney, H.Ö.; Murugusundaramoorthy, G.; Sokól, J. Subclasses of bi-univalent functions related to shell-like curves connected with Fibonacci numbers. Acta Univ. Sapientiae Math. 2018, 10, 70–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Güney, H.Ö.; Murugusundaramoorthy, G.; Sokól, J. Certain subclasses of bi-univalent functions related to k- Fibonacci numbers. Commun. Fac. Sci. Univ. Ank. Ser. A1 Math. Stat. 2019, 68, 1909–1921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Sokól, J.; Raina, R.K.; Özgür, N.Y. Applications of k -Fibonacci numbers for the starlike analytic functions. Hacet. J. Math. Stat. 2015, 44, 121–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Aldawish, I.; Al-Hawary, T.; Frasin, B.A. Subclasses of bi-univalent functions defined by Frasin differential operator. Mathematics 2020, 8, 783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Amourah, A.; Alsoboh, A.; Ogilat, O.; Gharib, G.M.; Saadeh, R.; Soudi, M.A. A Generalization of Gegenbauer Polynomials and Bi-Univalent Functions. Axioms 2023, 12, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Alsoboh, A.; Amourah, A.; Darus, M.; Sharefeen, R.I.A. Applications of Neutrosophic q-Poisson distribution Series for Subclass of Analytic Functions and Bi-Univalent Functions. Mathematics 2023, 11, 868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Alsoboh, A.; Darus, M. On Fekete–Szegö Problems for Certain Subclasses of Analytic Functions Defined by Differential Operator Involving q-Ruscheweyh Operator. J. Funct. Spaces 2020, 2020, 8459405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Amourah, A.; Alomari, M.; Yousef, F.; Alsoboh, A. Consolidation of a certain discrete probability distribution with a subclass of bi-univalent functions involving Gegenbauer polynomials. Math. Probl. Eng. 2022, 2022, 6354994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Al-Hawary, T.; Amourah, A.; Alsoboh, A.; Alsalhi, O. A new comprehensive subclass of analytic bi-univalent functions related to gegenbauer polynomials. Symmetry. 2023, 15.3, 576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Alsoboh, A.; Darus, M.; Amourah, A.; Atshan, W.G. A Certain Subclass of Harmonic Meromorphic Functions with Respect to k-Symmetric Points. Int. J. Open Problems Complex Analysis. 2023, 15, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  31. Alamoush, A.G. On a subclass of bi-univalent functions associated to Horadam polynomials. Int. J. Open Problems Complex Analysis. 2020, 12, 58–65. [Google Scholar]
  32. Amourah, A.; Frasin, B.A.; Abdeljawad, T. Fekete-Szegö inequality for analytic and biunivalent functions subordinate to Gegenbauer polynomials. J. Funct. Spaces 2021, 2021, 5574673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Amourah, A.; Al-Hawary, T.; Frasin, B.A. Application of Chebyshev polynomials to certain class of bi-Bazilevič functions of order α+. Afr. Mat. 2021, 32, 1059–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Amourah, A.; Frasin, B.A.; Murugusundaramoorthy, G.; Al-Hawary, T. Bi-Bazilevič functions of order ϑ+ associated with (p;q)- Lucas polynomials. AIMS Math. 2021, 6, 4296–4305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Swamy, S.R.; Bulut, S.; Sailaja, Y. Some special families of holomorphic and Sălăgean type bi-univalent functions associated with Horadam polynomials involving modified sigmoid activation function. Hacet. J. Math. Stat. 2021, 50, 710–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Swamy, S.R.; Wanas, A.K.; Sailaja, Y. Some special families of holomorphic and Sălăgean type bi-univalent functions associated with (m,n)-Lucas polynomials. Commun. Math. Appl. 2020, 11, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  37. Frasin, B.A.; Swamy, S.R.; Nirmala, J. Some special families of holomorphic and Al-Oboudi type bi-univalent functions related to k-Fibonacci numbers involving modified sigmoid activated function. Affr. Mat. 2021, 32, 631–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Pommerenke, C. Univalent Functions; Vandenhoeck and Rupercht: Göttingen, Germany, 1975. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Amourah, A.; Aldawish, I.; Frasin, B.A.; Al-Hawary, T. Applications of Shell-like Curves Connected with Fibonacci Numbers. Axioms 2023, 12, 639. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms12070639

AMA Style

Amourah A, Aldawish I, Frasin BA, Al-Hawary T. Applications of Shell-like Curves Connected with Fibonacci Numbers. Axioms. 2023; 12(7):639. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms12070639

Chicago/Turabian Style

Amourah, Ala, Ibtisam Aldawish, Basem Aref Frasin, and Tariq Al-Hawary. 2023. "Applications of Shell-like Curves Connected with Fibonacci Numbers" Axioms 12, no. 7: 639. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms12070639

APA Style

Amourah, A., Aldawish, I., Frasin, B. A., & Al-Hawary, T. (2023). Applications of Shell-like Curves Connected with Fibonacci Numbers. Axioms, 12(7), 639. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms12070639

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop