Abstract
We establish new simple bounds for the quotients of inverse trigonometric and inverse hyperbolic functions such as and . The main results provide polynomial bounds using even quadratic functions and exponential bounds under the form Graph validation is also performed.
MSC:
26D05; 26D07; 26D20; 33B10
1. Introduction
As discussed in [], functions whose graphs are similar to bell-shaped curves should be studied, and one of the aspects is to investigate the bounds of such functions. For the bounds of this type of functions involving inverse trigonometric and inverse hyperbolic functions, we refer the reader to [,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,] and references therein. Chesneau and Bagul [] investigated the sharp bounds for ratio functions and . These inequalities were carefully studied and generalized by Kostić et al. [] to get several types of bounds using infinite products.
Recently, Bagul et al. [] corroborated the following double inequalities involving exponential bounds.
Proposition 1
([] Proposition 1). For where , the inequalities
hold with the best possible constants and
Proposition 2
([] Proposition 2). For the inequalities
hold with the best possible constants and
Proposition 3
([] Proposition 4). For where the inequalities
hold with the best possible constants and
We contribute to the subject by establishing polynomial and exponential bounds for the functions and , which are motivated by these works. In the whole paper, it is to be noted that the superscript “−” for trigonometric and hyperbolic functions is used for their inverses.
2. Main Theorems
2.1. Statements
Our main results are the following theorems.
Theorem 1.
and are the best possible constants such that the inequalities
hold.
Theorem 2.
If and r is any real number in , then the inequalities
hold with the best possible constants and
Theorem 3.
and are the best possible constants such that the inequalities
hold.
Theorem 4.
If and r is any real number in , then the inequalities
hold with the best possible constants and
Since and by the well-known inequality it is not difficult to see that the lower bounds of (6) and (7) are sharper than those of (4) and (5), respectively.
Corollary 1.
If then we have
2.2. Graphical Illustrations
In this part, we compare the obtained bounds by the means of graphics, with a discussion.
Figure 1 presents the bounds obtained in Theorems 1 and 3 for the “ratio sin” function defined by .
Figure 1.
Visual comparison of the bounds for : (a) lower bounds with , and (b) upper bounds for .
It can be observed that the exponential bounds are sharper.
Figure 2 displays the bounds obtained in Theorems 1 and 3 for the “ratio tan” function defined by .
Figure 2.
Visual comparison of the bounds for : (a) lower bounds with , and (b) upper bounds for , with (arbitrarily taken into ).
Again, it can be observed that the exponential bounds are sharper.
Thus, the graphical illustrations reveal that the upper bounds of (6) and (7) are sharper than those of (4) and (5), respectively.
We end by illustrating the ratio comparison states in Corollary 1 in Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Visual comparison between and .
3. Auxiliary Results
In order to prove our main results, we need the following lemmas from the existing literature.
Lemma 1
([] L’Hôpital’s rule of monotonicity). Let be two real-valued functions which are continuous on and differentiable on , where and for Let,
Then,
- (i)
- and are increasing on if is increasing on ; and
- (ii)
- and are decreasing on if is decreasing on
The strictness of the monotonicity of and depends on the strictness of the monotonicity of
Lemma 2
([] Lemma 2). For we have
and
The series for (sin−1 x)2 can also be found in []. For series expansions of powers of we refer to [] and references therein.
We also prove some other lemmas that are required to prove our main results.
Lemma 3.
The following inequality is true.
Proof.
Let
Differentiation gives
Since and , clearly, for , we get
which results in So is strictly increasing in and we have □
Note 1.
The inequality (9) is a refinement of the inequality
See, for instance, [].
Lemma 4.
For the inequality
is true.
Proof.
From Theorem 2.2 of [], we have
Combining this inequality with (1), we get the desired inequality (10). □
Lemma 5.
For it holds that
Proof.
A combination of inequalities (1.1) of [] and (1.1) of [] gives (11). □
Lemma 6.
The inequality
holds in
Proof.
From Theorem 4 (inequality (2.12)) of [], we have
and from Theorem 2.4 (inequality (2.4)) of [], we have
Since the above inequality can be written as
Lemma 7.
For we have
Proof.
By Proposition 3 of [], we have
Similarly, from Theorem 2.3 (inequality (2.3)) of [], we write
By simply adding these inequalities we get the required inequality (14). □
4. Proofs of Theorems
Proof of Theorem 1.
Let us set
where and with and . By differentiating with respect to x, we obtain
where and with and . By differentiating again with respect to x, we get
where and with and . Then,
where with Now we need to show that is strictly increasing on To demonstrate the required monotonicity of we must prove that . First, we show that the numerator in , say , is positive on We have
Simplifying the above expression we get the following
due to the fact that Thus,
So and hence is positive. As a result, is strictly increasing on . By successive application of Lemma 1, we conclude that is strictly increasing on . Therefore, , where and . This completes the proof of Theorem 1. □
Proof of Theorem 2.
Let
where and satisfying By differentiating with respect to x, we have
where and with Differentiation gives us
where and are such that and Differentiating again with respect to x, we get
where with We show that is strictly increasing on We demonstrate the positivity of by showing that the numerator of , say , is positive. We have
Simplifying the above as in the proof of Theorem 2 and using the fact that , we get
Therefore, is increasing. By Lemma 1, it is concluded that is strictly increasing in . Consequently, The inequalities (5) follow due to the limits and □
Proof of Theorem 3.
Let us set
By differentiation, we obtain
where is strictly positively increasing in and
due to Lemma 5. We prove that is strictly monotonically increasing in We differentiate with respect to x to get
After some calculations, we get
due to Lemmas 4 and 5. Then, we have
where Let us now consider
Therefore,
Next, we prove that
Equivalently,
or
i.e.,
Making use of Lemma 2, we write
where
Clearly, for For we write
where
Now it is very easy to prove that for and hence for This shows that for , implying that and , which further implies and Then is strictly monotonically increasing in as and both are monotonically increasing in . Thus, and thus, according to Lemma 1, is also monotonically increasing in As a result, The limits and give the required inequalities (6). □
Proof of Theorem 4.
Let us set
After differentiation, we obtain
Consider
where and satisfying Differentiation gives
where and with Differentiating again, we get
which is strictly increasing in By Lemma 1, is strictly increasing in In addition, by Lemma 6 and the fact that
we get that is positive in
Now, consider
Then, we have
by Lemma 7. Therefore is strictly increasing in Thus, since is the product of two positively increasing functions, it is increasing in By Lemma 1, is strictly increasing in Consequently, we have
The desired inequalities (7) follow due to the limits and □
Remark 2.
Proof of Corollary 1.
It is an immediate consequence of Theorems 1 and 2, and Remark 2. □
Remark 3.
A better upper bound for in can be found in Lemma 6, as stated in Remark 1.
5. Conclusions and Direction for Further Research
Polynomial and exponential bounds for bell-shaped functions involving only trigonometric or only hyperbolic functions or their inverses are present in the literature. Recently, these types of bounds have been obtained for the quotients of trigonometric and hyperbolic functions. We contributed to the field by establishing similar bounds for the quotients of inverse trigonometric and inverse hyperbolic functions, which can be useful in the theory of analytical inequalities. The exponential bounds were sharper than the polynomial bounds.
Wilker-type and Huygens-type inequalities for inverse trigonometric and inverse hyperbolic function quotients may also be obtained.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, S.B.T., Y.J.B., R.M.D. and C.C.; methodology, S.B.T., Y.J.B., R.M.D. and C.C.; validation, S.B.T., Y.J.B., R.M.D. and C.C.; formal analysis, S.B.T., Y.J.B., R.M.D. and C.C.; investigation, S.B.T., Y.J.B., R.M.D. and C.C.; writing—original draft preparation, S.B.T., Y.J.B., R.M.D. and C.C.; writing—review and editing, S.B.T., Y.J.B., R.M.D. and C.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Chesneau, C.; Bagul, Y.J. Some new bounds for ratio functions of trigonometric and hyperbolic functions. Indian J. Math. 2019, 61, 153–160. Available online: http://www.amsallahabad.org/ijm.html (accessed on 1 February 2022).
- Chen, C.-P. Sharp Wilker- and Huygens-type inequalities for inverse trigonometric and inverse hyperbolic functions. Integral Tansforms Spec. Funct. 2012, 23, 865–873. Available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10652469.2011.644851 (accessed on 1 February 2022). [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.-P.; Malešević, B. Inequalities related to certain inverse trigonometric and inverse hyperbolic functions. RACSAM Rev. R Acad. A 2020, 114, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chouikha, A. Sharp Inequalities for Ratio of Trigonometric and Hyperbolic Functions. ffhal02496089f. 2020. Available online: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02496089/document (accessed on 1 February 2022).
- Dhaigude, R.M.; Bagul, Y.J. Simple efficient bounds for arcsine and arctangent functions. South East Asian J. Math. Math. Sci. 2021, 17, 45–62. Available online: http://rsmams.org/journals/articleinfo.php?articleid=621&tag=seajmams (accessed on 1 February 2022).
- Dhaigude, R.M.; Thool, S.B.; Bagul, Y.J.; Raut, V.M. On simple bounds for inverse hyperbolic sine and inverse hyperbolic tangent functions. Jnanabha 2021, 51, 101–108. Available online: https://www.vijnanaparishadofindia.org/jnanabha/volume-51-no-1-2021/51_1_p14 (accessed on 1 February 2022).
- Guo, B.-N.; Luo, Q.-M.; Qi, F. Sharpening and generalizations of Shafer-Fink’s double inequality for the arc sine function. Filomat 2013, 27, 261–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malešević, B.; Rašajski, M.; Lutovac, T. Refined estimates and generalizations of inequalities related to arctangent function and Shafer’s inequality. Math. Probl. Eng. 2018, 8, 4178629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malešević, B.; Rašajski, M.; Lutovac, T. Refinements and generalizations of some inequalities of Shafer-Fink’s type for the inverse sine function. J. Inequal. Appl. 2017, 2017, 275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mitrinović, D.S. Analytic Inequalities; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1970. [Google Scholar]
- Mortici, C.; Srivastava, H.M. Estimates for the arctangent function related to Shafer’s inequality. Colloq. Math. 2014, 136, 263–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nishizawa, Y. Refined quadratic estimations of Shafer’s inequality. J. Inequal. Appl. 2017, 2017, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiao, Q.-X.; Chen, C.P. Approximations to inverse tangent function. J. Inequal. Appl. 2018, 2018, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shafer, R.E. Analytic inequalities obtained by quadratic approximation. Publikacije Elektrotehničkog Fakulteta Serija Matematika i Fizika 1977, 577–598, 96–97. [Google Scholar]
- Sun, J.-L.; Chen, C.-P. Shafer-type inequalities for inverse trigonometric functions and Gauss lemniscate functions. J. Inequal. Appl. 2016, 2016, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Zhu, L. On a quadratic estimate of Shafer. J. Math. Inequal. 2008, 2, 571–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, L. New inequalities of Shafer-Fink type for arc hyperbolic sine. J. Inequal. Appl. 2008, 5, 3682275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, L.; Malešević, B. Natural approximation of Masjed-Jamei’s inequality. RACSAM 2020, 114, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, L. The natural approaches of Shafer-Fink inequality for inverse sine function. Mathematics 2022, 10, 647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Z.-H.; Tin, K.-F.; Gao, Q. The monotonicity of ratios involving arc tangent function with applications. Open Math. 2019, 17, 1450–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kostić, M.; Bagul, Y.J.; Chesneau, C. Generalized inequalities for ratio functions of trigonometric and hyperbolic functions. Indian J. Math. 2020, 62, 183–190. Available online: http://www.amsallahabad.org/ijm.html (accessed on 1 February 2022).
- Bagul, Y.J.; Dhaigude, R.M.; Thool, S.B. New inequalities for quotients of circular and hyperbolic functions. RGMIA Res. Rep. Coll. 2020, 34, 16. Available online: https://rgmia.org/papers/v23/v23a34.pdf (accessed on 1 February 2022).
- Anderson, G.D.; Vamanamurthy, M.K.; Vuorinen, M. Conformal Invariants, Inequalities and Quasiconformal Maps; John Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Gradshteyn, I.S.; Ryzhik, I.M. Table of Integrals, Series, and Products, 11th ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Guo, B.-N.; Lim, D.; Qi, F. Series expansions of powers of arcsine, closed forms for special values of Bell polynomials, and series representations of generalized logsine functions. AIMS Math. 2021, 6, 7494–7517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).