Abstract
In this paper, the authors provide several sharp upper and lower bounds for the Neuman–Sándor mean in terms of the arithmetic and contra-harmonic means, and present some new sharp inequalities involving hyperbolic sine function and hyperbolic cosine function.
Keywords:
Neuman–Sándor mean; arithmetic mean; contra-harmonic mean; bound; inequality; hyperbolic sine function; hyperbolic cosine function MSC:
Primary 26E60; Secondary 26D07; 33B10; 41A30
1. Introduction
In the literature, the quantities
are called in [1,2,3], for example, the arithmetic mean, geometric mean, harmonic mean, centroidal mean, contra-harmonic mean, root-square mean, and the power mean of order p of two positive numbers s and t, respectively.
For with , the first Seiffert means , the second Seiffert means , and Neuman–Sándor mean are, respectively, defined [4,5,6] by
where is the inverse hyperbolic sine function.
The first Seiffert mean can be rewritten [6] (Equation (2.4]) as
A chain of inequalities
were given in [6], where
is the p-th generalized logarithmic mean of s and t with .
In [6,7], three double inequalities
and
were established for with .
For with , the inequalities
of Ky Fan type were presented in [6] (Proposition 2.2).
In [8], Li and their two coauthors showed that the double inequality
holds for all with and for , where is the unique solution of the equation .
In [9], Neuman proved that the double inequalities
and
hold for all with if and only if
and
In [10], (Theorems 1.1 to 1.3), it was found that the double inequalities
and
hold for all with if and only if
and
In 2017, Chen and their two coauthors [11] established bounds for Neuman–Sándor mean in terms of the convex combination of the logarithmic mean and the second Seiffert mean . In 2022, Wang and Yin [12] obtained bounds for the reciprocals of the Neuman–Sándor mean .
In [13], it was showed that the double inequality
holds for all with if and only if and , where is the Toader mean introduced in [14] by
In this paper, motivated by the double inequality (1), we will aim to find out the largest values , and and the smallest values , and such that the double inequalities
and
hold for all positive real numbers s and t with .
2. Lemmas
To attain our main purposes, we need the following lemmas.
Lemma 1
([15] (Theorem 1.25)). For , let be continuous on , differentiable on , and on . If is (strictly) increasing (or (strictly) decreasing, respectively) on , so are the functions
Lemma 2
([16] (Lemma 1.1)). Suppose that the power series and have the convergent radius and for all . Let . Then the following statements are true.
- (1)
- If the sequence is (strictly) increasing (or decreasing, respectively), then is also (strictly) increasing (or decreasing, respectively) on .
- (2)
- If the sequence is (strictly) increasing (or decreasing resepctively) for and (strictly) decreasing (or increasing resepctively) for , then there exists such that is (strictly) increasing (decreasing) on and (strictly) decreasing (or increasing resepctively) on .
Lemma 3.
Let
Then is strictly decreasing on with and .
Proof.
Let
Using the power series
we can express the functions and as
Hence, we have
where and .
Let . Then
As a result, by Lemma 2, it follows that the function is strictly decreasing on . From (6), it is easy to see that .
Using the L’Hospital rule leads to immediately. The proof of Lemma 3 is complete. □
Lemma 4.
Let
Then is strictly increasing on and has the limit and .
Proof.
Let
Since
and
we obtain
where
By using the identity that , we arrive at
where and .
Straightforward computation gives
and
Consequently, we obtain
Using the power series of and , we deduce
and
Therefore, we find
where
Let . Then
When , we have . When , it follows that
By Lemma 2, it follows that the function is strictly decreasing on , so the function is strictly increasing on . Applying Lemma 1, it follows that the function is strictly increasing on . By the L’Hospital rule, we have
It is common knowledge that the function is strictly increasing on . Hence, the function is strictly increasing on . Therefore, the function is strictly increasing on with the limits
The proof of Lemma 3 is complete. □
Lemma 5.
Let
Then is strictly increasing on and has the limit .
3. Bounds for Neuman–Sándor Mean
Now we are in a position to state and prove our main results.
Theorem 1.
For with , the double inequality (2) holds if and only if
Proof.
Without loss of generality, we assume that . Let . Then and
Let . Then and
Let
Then elaborated computations lead to and
Combining this with Lemmas 1 and 3 reveals that the function is strictly increasing on . Moreover, it is easy to compute the limits
The proof of Theorem 1 is thus complete. □
Corollary 1.
For all , the double inequality
holds if and only if
Theorem 2.
For with , the double inequality (3) holds if and only if
Proof.
Without loss of generality, we assume that . Let . Then and
Let . Then and
By Lemma 4, it is easy to show that is strictly increasing on . Moreover, the limits
can be computed readily. The double inequality (3) is thus proved. □
Corollary 2.
For all , the double inequality
holds if and only if
Theorem 3.
For with , the double inequality (4) holds if and only if
Proof.
Without loss of generality, we assume that . Let . Then and
Let . Then and
where
Then and
Denote
it is easy to obtain and
Since the function is strictly increasing on , by Lemma 5, we see that the ratio in (10) is strictly increasing and is strictly decreasing on . Consequently, from Lemma 1, it follows that is strictly decreasing on .
The limits
can be computed easily. The proof of Theorem 3 is thus complete. □
Corollary 3.
For all , the double inequality
holds if and only if
4. A Double Inequality
From Lemma 5, we can deduce
for . The inequality
for can be found and has been applied in [17] (p. 65), [18] (p. 300), [19] (pp. 279, 3.6.9), and [20] (p. 260). In [21], (Lemma 3), Zhu recovered the fact stated in [19] (pp. 279, 3.6.9) that the exponent 3 in the inequality (13) is the least possible, that is, the inequality
for holds if and only if .
Theorem 4.
The inequality
for holds if and only if and .
Proof.
Let
Direct calculation yields
Using the power series of and , we obtain
and
where
When setting , we obtain
is increasing on . Therefore, by Lemma 2, the ratio is increasing on . Using Lemma 1, we obtain that
is increasing on .
Moreover, the limits and are obvious. The proof of Lemma 4 is thus complete. □
5. A Remark
For , we have
where the rising factorial is defined by
and is called central factorial numbers of the second kind and can be computed by
for .
The series expansion (16) was recently derived in [22] (Corollary 4.1).
Can one find bounds of the function for ?
6. Conclusions
In this paper, we found out the largest values , , and the smallest values , , such that the double inequalities (2), (3), and (4) hold for all positive real number with . Moreover, we presented some new sharp inequalities (8), (9), (11), and (15) involving the hyperbolic sine function and the hyperbolic cosine function .
Author Contributions
Writing—original draft, W.-H.L., P.M. and B.-N.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank anonymous referees for their careful corrections to and valuable comments on the original version of this paper.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Jiang, W.-D.; Qi, F. Sharp bounds for Neuman–Sándor’s mean in terms of the root-mean-square. Period. Math. Hung. 2014, 69, 134–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Jiang, W.-D.; Qi, F. Sharp bounds in terms of the power of the contra-harmonic mean for Neuman–Sándor mean. Cogent Math. 2015, 2, 995951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Qi, F.; Li, W.-H. A unified proof of inequalities and some new inequalities involving Neuman–Sándor mean. Miskolc Math. Notes 2014, 15, 665–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seiffert, H.-J. Problem 887. Nieuw Arch. Wiskd. 1993, 11, 176. [Google Scholar]
- Seiffert, H.-J. Aufgabe β 16. Wurzel 1995, 29, 221–222. [Google Scholar]
- Neuman, E.; Sándor, J. On the Schwab–Borchardt mean. Math. Pannon. 2003, 14, 253–266. [Google Scholar]
- Neuman, E.; Sándor, J. On the Schwab–Borchardt mean II. Math. Pannon. 2006, 17, 49–59. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Y.-M.; Long, B.-Y.; Chu, Y.-M. Sharp bounds for the Neuman–Sándor mean in terms of generalized logarithmic mean. J. Math. Inequal. 2012, 6, 567–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neuman, E. A note on a certain bivariate mean. J. Math. Inequal. 2012, 6, 637–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, T.-H.; Chu, Y.-M.; Liu, B.-Y. Optimal bounds for Neuman–Sándor mean in terms of the convex combinations of harmonic, geometric, quadratic, and contraharmonic means. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2012, 2012, 302635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, J.-J.; Lei, J.-J.; Long, B.-Y. Optimal bounds for Neuman–Sándor mean in terms of the convex combination of the logarithmic and the second Seiffert means. J. Inequal. Appl. 2017, 2017, 251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, X.-L.; Yin, L. Sharp bounds for the reciprocals of the Neuman–Sándor mean. J. Interdiscip. Math. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hua, Y.; Qi, F. The best bounds for Toader mean in terms of the centroidal and arithmetic means. Filomat 2014, 28, 775–59780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Toader, G. Some mean values related to the arithmetic-geometric mean. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1998, 218, 358–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anderson, G.D.; Vamanamurthy, M.K.; Vuorinen, M. Conformal Invariants, Inequalities, and Quasiconformal Maps; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Simić, S.; Vuorinen, M. Landen inequalities for zero-balanced hypergeometric functions. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2012, 2012, 932061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, B.-N.; Qi, F. The function (bx-ax)/x: Logarithmic convexity and applications to extended mean values. Filomat 2011, 25, 63–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuang, J.C. Applied Inequalities, 3rd ed.; Shangdong Science and Technology Press: Jinan, China, 2004; pp. 300–301. [Google Scholar]
- Mitrinović, D.S. Analytic Inequalities; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1970. [Google Scholar]
- Qi, F. On bounds for norms of sine and cosine along a circle on the complex plane. Kragujevac J. Math. 2024, 48, 255–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, L. On Wilker-type inequalities. Math. Inequal. Appl. 2007, 10, 727–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, F.; Taylor, P. Several series expansions for real powers and several formulas for partial Bell polynomials of sinc and sinhc functions in terms of central factorial and Stirling numbers of second kind. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2204.05612v4. [Google Scholar]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).