Abstract
Recent advances in mathematical inequalities suggest that bounds of polynomial-exponential-type are appropriate for evaluating key trigonometric functions. In this paper, we innovate in this sense by establishing new and sharp bounds of the form for the trigonometric sinc and cosine functions. Our main result for the sinc function is a double inequality holding on the interval , while our main result for the cosine function is a double inequality holding on the interval Comparable sharp results for hyperbolic functions are also obtained. The proofs are based on series expansions, inequalities on the Bernoulli numbers, and the monotone form of the l’Hospital rule. Some comparable bounds of the literature are improved. Examples of application via integral techniques are given.
Keywords:
polynomial-exponential bounds; l’Hôpital’s rule of monotonicity; Bernoulli numbers; Jordan’s inequality; Kober’s inequality; trigonometric functions MSC:
26D05; 26D07; 26D20; 33B10
1. Introduction
We know that the sinc and cosine functions, i.e., and , are less than 1 for . These rude inequalities have been refined over time in several ways. In this regard, we may mention Jordan’s and Kober’s inequalities, which are
and
respectively. Several proofs of these results exist. We refer the reader to [1,2,3,4,5,6] for more information. Due to their importance in mathematics, the inequalities (1) and (2) are sharpened and generalized in many ways by researchers. Moreover, different bounds for sine and cosine functions have been established in the literature so far. The list of references of this topic is extensive, and includes [3,4,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. The obtained bounds involve polynomial functions, trigonometric functions, exponential functions, and combinations of them. In particular, recently, Chouikha et al. in [18] obtained the polynomial-exponential bounds for the sinc and cosine functions, as follows:
and
The inequalities (3)–(5) were proven by infinite product methods. They demonstrate that bounds of polynomial-exponential-type are appropriate for evaluating, with precision, these key trigonometric functions. This paper aims to provide some contributional material on this subject.
In the first part of this work, we aim to provide new sharp bounds for polynomial-exponential types of the form for the sinc and cosine functions. In the second part, we aim to present sharp polynomial-exponential bounds for the hyperbolic sinc and hyperbolic cosine functions. The constants are obtained such that the bounds are as sharp as possible. The proofs include series expansions, Bernoulli number inequalities, and the monotone form of the l’Hospital rule. As a result, we employ techniques that are completely different from those used by [18]. Furthermore, under some conditions on the domain of x, we improve the existing bounds of the literature, including those in (3)–(5). Another advantage of the findings is that the obtained bounds are manageable from the mathematical viewpoint. To illustrate that, some applications based on integral techniques are given to get new bounds for the cosine and hyperbolic cosine functions.
The organization of the paper is divided into the following sections: Section 2 presents the main theorems. Preliminaries and lemmas are described in Section 3. The proofs of the main results are detailed in Section 4. Applications are given in Section 5. Final discussions and conclusions are given in Section 6.
2. Main Theorems
We begin with our new polynomial-exponential bounds of the form for the sinc and cosine functions. Our main results are stated below.
Theorem 1.
The inequalities
hold; and are the best possible constants for lower and upper bounds for of the form with , respectively.
Theorem 2.
The inequalities
hold; and are the best possible constants for lower and upper bounds for of the form with , respectively.
Now, we aim to present sharp polynomial-exponential bounds for the hyperbolic sinc and hyperbolic cosine functions. In particular, we establish hyperbolic counterparts of (6) and (7) in the following theorems.
Theorem 3.
Let Then the inequalities
hold, with ; and are the best possible constants for lower and upper bounds for of the form with , respectively.
Theorem 4.
Let Then, the inequalities
hold with the best possible constants ; and are the best possible constants for lower and upper bounds for of the form with , respectively.
The proofs of these new results, several applications, and a discussion of the significance of the findings and existing literature results are presented in the remainder of the work.
3. Preliminaries and Lemmas
We first recall the following simple geometric series expansion:
as well as the following known power series expansions of and :
Furthermore, the following series expansions:
and
can be found in ([31], 1.411). Here, stands for the even indexed Bernoulli number.
Lemma 1
(see [32]). The inequality
holds for all integers .
The following lemma is known as a monotone form of l’Hôpital’s rule ([33] p. 10) (see also [34]).
Lemma 2.
Let be continuous functions. Moreover, let be differentiable functions on , with Set
Then we have:
- (i)
- and are increasing(strictly increasing) on if is increasing(strictly increasing) on
- (ii)
- and are decreasing(strictly decreasing) on if is decreasing(strictly decreasing) on
In addition to this, we need the following lemmas, which can be proven in a scholarly manner.
Lemma 3.
Let Then for all integers
Lemma 4.
Let Then for all integers
The above preliminaries are the basis of the proofs of the main results, which are the subject of the next section.
4. Proofs of Main Results
Proof of Theorem 1.
Proof of Theorem 2.
We set
where and such that Upon differentiation, we get
Utilizing (10) and (12), we write
Then
where for owing to Lemma 1. Therefore, we conclude that is decreasing in and hence is also decreasing in by Lemma 2. So The required inequalities (1.7) follow from the obvious limit equalities and This ends the proof. □
Proof of Theorem 3.
Let us consider the function
where and that satisfy By differentiation, we get
where From this, we obtain
where We simplify as follows:
By (11), it follows
where
Since , and for thanks to Lemma 3, it is clear that . Thus, we have Consequently, is decreasing for By Lemma 2, is decreasing for Lastly, due to relation the inequalities (8) follow. □
5. Applications
The bounds established in the previous theorems have the quality of being manageable from the analytical viewpoint. In this section, we exploit this quality to propose some other sharp polynomial-exponential bounds for cosine and hyperbolic cosine functions. More precisely, these bounds will be obtained from Theorems 1 and 2, and integral developments.
Proposition 1.
Let Then
where
and
Proof.
Proposition 2.
Let and Then
where
and the constant a being defined in Theorem 3.
6. Final Discussion and Conclusions
We now discuss the importance of our findings in the light of the existing results of the literature, and conclude the paper. Our first observation is that there are some limitations to the method used in [18] to obtain the polynomial-exponential bounds stated and proven in this paper. For instance, in [18], the lower bound for the sinc function is obtained in , whereas the upper bound is obtained in a half interval , and the upper bound of the cosine function is not obtained. We have adopted different methods and established comparable upper and lower polynomial-exponential bounds for sinc and cosine functions. The same kind of bounds for hyperbolic functions have never been discussed before in the literature. It is interesting to see that the bounds for hyperbolic functions in (8), (9), and (15) are very sharp and better than the existing bounds in the literature (they are better than the corresponding bounds presented in [19,24] and the references therein). Numerical calculations and graphical comparisons via the Maple software reveal the following important points:
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, Y.J.B., R.M.D., M.K. and C.C.; methodology, Y.J.B., R.M.D., M.K. and C.C.; validation, Y.J.B., R.M.D., M.K. and C.C.; formal analysis, Y.J.B., R.M.D., M.K. and C.C.; investigation, Y.J.B., R.M.D., M.K. and C.C.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.J.B., R.M.D., M.K. and C.C.; writing—review and editing, Y.J.B., R.M.D., M.K. and C.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the three reviewers for their constructive feedback on the initial draft of the work. Marko Kostić is partially supported by grant 451-03-68/2020/14/200156 of Ministry of Science and Technological Development, Republic of Serbia.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Abramowitz, M.; Stegun, I.A. (Eds.) Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables; Applied Mathematics Series; Ninth Printing; National Bureau of Standards: Washington, DC, USA, 1972; Volume 55.
- Bullen, P.S. A Dictionary of Inequalities. In Pitman Monographs and Surveys in Pure and Applied Mathematics; Addison Wesley Longman Limited: Harlow, UK, 1998; Volume 97. [Google Scholar]
- Feng, Y.-F. Proof Without Words: Jordan’s Inequality 2x/π ≤ sinx ≤ x,0 ≤ x ≤ π/2. Math. Mag. 1996, 69, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kober, H. Approximation by integral functions in the complex domain. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 1944, 56, 7–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Mitrinović, D.S. Analytic Inequalities; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1970. [Google Scholar]
- Sándor, J. On the concavity of sin x/x. Octogon Math. Mag. 2005, 13, 406–407. [Google Scholar]
- Bagul, Y.J.; Chesneau, C. Generalized Bounds for Sine and Cosine Functions. Asian-Eur. J. Math. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bagul, Y.J.; Chesneau, C. Refined forms of Oppenheim and Cusa–Huygens type inequalities. Acta Comment. Univ. Tartu. Math. 2020, 24, 183–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bagul, Y.J.; Chesneau, C.; Kostić, M. On the Cusa-Huygens inequality. RACSAM 2021, 115, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bagul, Y.J.; Banjac, B.; Chesneau, C.; Kostić, M.; Malešević, B. New refinements of Cusa-Huygens inequality. Results Math. 2021, 76, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bagul, Y.J.; Panchal, S.K. Certain inequalities of Kober and Lazarević type. J. Indian Math. Soc. 2022, 89, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
- Bercu, G. The natural approach of trigonometric inequalities—Padé approximant. J. Math. Inequal. 2017, 11, 181–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bercu, G. Sharp bounds on the sinc function via the Fourier series method. J. Math. Inequal. 2019, 13, 495–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhayo, B.A.; Klén, R.; Sándor, J. New trigonometric and hyperbolic inequalities. Miskolc Math. Notes 2017, 18, 125–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Chen, C.-P.; Sándor, J. Sharp inequalities for trigonometric and hyperbolic functions. J. Math. Inequal. 2015, 9, 203–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chesneau, C.; Bagul, Y.J. A note on some new bounds for trigonometric functions using infinite products. Malays. J. Math. Sci. 2020, 14, 273–283. [Google Scholar]
- Chouikha, A.R. Sharp inequalities on circular and hyperbolic functions using Bernoulli inequality types. RACSAM 2021, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chouikha, A.R.; Chesneau, C.; Bagul, Y.J. Some refinements of well-known inequalities involving trigonometric functions. J. Ramanujan Math. Soc. 2021, 36, 193–202. [Google Scholar]
- Dhaigude, R.M.; Bagul, Y.J.; Raut, V.M. Generalized bounds for hyperbolic sine and hyperbolic cosine functions. Tbilisi Math. J. 2021, 14, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malešević, B.; Lutovac, T.; Banjac, B. One method for proving some classes of exponential analytic inequalities. Filomat 2018, 32, 6921–6925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malešević, B.; Lutovac, T.; Rašajski, M.; Banjac, B. Double-sided Taylor’s approximations and their applications in theory of trigonometric inequalities. In Trigonometric Sums and Their Applications; Raigorodskii, A., Rassias, M.T., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 159–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mortici, C. The natural approach of Wilker-Cusa-Huygens inequalities. Math. Inequal. Appl. 2011, 14, 535–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nenezić, M.; Malešević, B.; Mortici, C. New approximations of some expressions involving trigonometric functions. Appl. Math. Comput. 2016, 283, 299–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neuman, E. Refinements and generalizations of certain inequalities involving trigonometric and hyperbolic functions. Adv. Inequal. Appl. 2012, 1, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
- Qi, F.; Niu, D.-W.; Guo, B.-N. Refinements, Generalizations and Applications of Jordan’s inequality and related problems. J. Inequal. Appl. 2009, 2009, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, L.; Ma, X. Some new results of Mitrinović-Cusa’s and related inequalities based on the interpolation and approximation method. J. Math. 2021, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, L. A source of inequalities for circular functions. Comput. Math. Appl. 2009, 58, 1998–2004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, L. Some new bounds for Sinc function by simultaneous approximation of the base and exponential functions. RACSAM 2020, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, L. New bounds for the sine function and tangent function. Mathematics 2021, 9, 2373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, L.; Malešević, B. New Wilker-type and Huygens-type inequalities. Hacet. J. Math. Stat. 2021, 50, 46–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gradshteyn, I.S.; Ryzhik, I.M. Table of Integrals, Series and Products; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Alzer, H. Sharp bounds for the Bernoulli numbers. Arch. Math. 2000, 74, 207–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anderson, G.D.; Vamanamurthy, M.K.; Vuorinen, M. Conformal Invariants, Inequalities and Quasiconformal Maps; John Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kwong, M.K. On Hopital-style rules for monotonicity and oscillation. arXiv 2015, arXiv:1502.07805. [Google Scholar]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).