Extraction of Boron from Ludwigite Ore: Mechanism of Soda-Ash Roasting of Lizardite and Szaibelyite
by
, ,
Xin Zhang
,
Guanghui Li
,
Jinxiang You
,
Jian Wang
,
Jun Luo
,
Jiaoyang Duan
,
Tao Zhang
,
Zhiwei Peng
, 
Mingjun Rao
* and
Tao Jiang
School of Minerals Processing and Bioengineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2019, 9(9), 533; https://doi.org/10.3390/min9090533
Submission received: 30 July 2019
/
Revised: 30 August 2019
/
Accepted: 30 August 2019
/
Published: 31 August 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cleaner Production in Mineral Processing)
Abstract
:Ludwigite ore is a typical low-grade boron ore accounting for 58.5% boron resource of China, which is mainly composed of magnetite, lizardite and szaibelyite. During soda-ash roasting of ludwigite ore, the presence of lizardite hinders the selective activation of boron. In this work, lizardite and szaibelyite were prepared and their soda-ash roasting behaviors were investigated using thermogravimetric-differential scanning calorimetry (TG-DSC), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and scanning electron microscope and energy dispersive spectrometer (SEM-EDS) analyses, in order to shed light on the soda-ash activation of boron within ludwigite ore. Thermodynamics of Na2CO3-MgSiO3-Mg2SiO4-Mg2B2O5 via FactSage show that the formation of Na2MgSiO4 was preferential for the reaction between Na2CO3 and MgSiO3/Mg2SiO4. While, regarding the reaction between Na2CO3 and Mg2B2O5, the formation of NaBO2 was foremost. Raising temperature was beneficial for the soda-ash roasting of lizardite and szaibelyite. At a temperature lower than the melting of sodium carbonate (851 °C), the soda-ash roasting of szaibelyite was faster than that of lizardite. Moreover, the melting of sodium carbonate accelerated the reaction between lizardite with sodium carbonate.
1. Introduction
Boron is widely used in glass, ceramic, abstergent and fertilizers, accounting for three-quarters of the global boron consumption annually, in which borax and boric acid are the most commonly traded commodities [1]. Boron reserves in China are mainly ludwigite ore, which accounts for 58.5% boron resource [2]. Nevertheless, the average content of B2O3 is merely 7 wt.%, which is far lower than those of Turkey, USA, etc. [3,4]. As the increasing demand for boron resource, the effective utilization of the ludwigite ore is imperative to supply boron for China domestically.
Ludwigite ore reserved in China (mainly in Liaoning and Jilin Provinces) is a typical low-grade boron ore, which is mainly composed of magnetite (Fe3O4), lizardite (Mg3Si2O5(OH)4) and szaibelyite (Mg2B2O4(OH)2) [5,6]. It has yet to be utilized on a large scale, due to its low B2O3 grade and the complex mineralogy [7,8]. Extensive efforts have been paid to recover boron, as well as other valuable components [9,10,11,12]. The soda-ash roasting method has been proved to be an effective way for boron extraction from low-grade ludwigite ore, by improving the leaching activity of B2O3 with the aid of sodium carbonate [13,14]. Recently, an alternative method for simultaneously recovering boron and iron has been proposed in our previous research, with the advantage of low-cost synthesis of sodium metaborate (NaBO2·2H2O) and preparation of powdery DRI (direct reduction iron) [15]. The simultaneous boron activation, along with iron metallization in a reductive atmosphere enables the comprehensive utilization of valuable components from ludwigite ore. This process simplifies the subsequent separating and synthesizing procedures, compared to many other trials, such as smelting reduction followed by alkali leaching in order to recover iron and boron stepwise [9,11], and molten sodium hydroxide leaching to utilize boron individually [16,17,18].
During soda-ash roasting of ludwigite ore, sodium carbonate would react with both szaibelyite and lizardite, hindering the selective activation of boron. Hence, the dosage of sodium carbonate and the roasting conditions were closely relevant to the soda-ash roasting of ludwigite ore in the roasting process. In this work, lizardite and szaibelyite were prepared, and their behaviors of soda-ash roasting were investigated, in order to shed light on the soda-ash activation of boron within ludwigite ore.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials
Lizardite and szaibelyite were prepared from natural ores. The as-prepared samples were dried, crushed, ground and screened to 80% passing through 0.074 mm. Chemical composition and XRD patterns of these two samples are given in Table 1 and Figure 1, respectively. The corresponding purities of lizardite (calculated by SiO2 content in the form of Mg3Si2O5(OH)4) and szaibelyite (calculated by B2O3 content in the form of Mg2B2O5·H2O) are 86.3% and 94.6%, respectively.
To identify the dehydroxylation products, lizardite and szaibelyite were roasted at 1000 °C for 60 min in a nitrogen atmosphere, and their XRD patterns are presented in Figure 2. Forsterite (Mg2SiO4) and enstatite (MgSiO3) were formed after dihydroxylation of lizardite, while suanite (Mg2B2O5) was the main component of dihydroxylation of szaibelyite.
Nitrogen gas with high purity (99.999%) and sodium carbonate of analytical reagent (AR) grade were purchased and used in this work.
2.2. Soda-Ash Roasting
The ground samples of lizardite and szaibelyite were thoroughly mixed with sodium carbonate chemical reagent with the molar ratio of 1:2 and 1:1, respectively. Every two-gram mixture was briquetted into a cylinder with 10 mm in diameter under the pressure of 10 MPa. The green cylinders were dried at 110 °C for 2 h. Subsequently, the dried cylinders were placed in a porcelain crucible and loaded into a quartz tube (the inner diameter of the quartz tube of 20 mm). The samples were pushed to the roasting zone in an electrically heated horizontal tube furnace. Before-hand, the furnace was heated to a preset temperature. The roasting temperature was measured with a Pt-Rh thermocouple and controlled using a KSY intelligent temperature controller (±5 °C). The experimental schematic diagram is described in Figure 3. High-purity of nitrogen gas (99.999%) was introduced to the quartz tube throughout the roasting process, and the gas flow rate was fixed at 200 L/h. After roasting, the briquettes were taken out of the furnace for cooling to room temperature in air atmosphere.
2.3. Characterization
The chemical compositions of lizardite and szaibelyite samples were determined using an inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometer (ICP-AES, ICAP-7600, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Mineral components of roasted briquettes were analyzed by XRD (RIGAKU D/Max 2500, Tokyo, Japan) using Cu Kα radiation (k = 0.154178 nm) with 40 kV scanning voltage and 40 mA scanning current ranging from 10° to 80°. Thermogravimetric-differential scanning calorimetry (TG-DSC) tests were conducted in a simultaneous thermal analyzer (Netzsch STA 449F3, Düsseldorf, Germany). Meanwhile, a part of roasted briquettes was fixed into an epoxy resin mould, ground and polished to prepare cross-sections for SEM-EDS (TESCAN MIRA3, Brno, Czech Republic) analysis.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Thermodynamic Analysis
To identify the reaction priority of lizardite and szaibelyite with sodium carbonate, standard Gibbs free energies of related reactions were calculated using software FactSage 7.1. Considering the dehydroxylation of lizardite and szaibelyite during roasting, the related reactions and the corresponding standard Gibbs free energies of Na2CO3-MgSiO3/Mg2SiO4 and Na2CO3-Mg2B2O5 systems were calculated.
3.1.1. Na2CO3-MgSiO3/Mg2SiO4 System
Table 2 shows the possible reactions of Na2CO3-MgSiO3 and Na2CO3-Mg2SiO4 systems. The relationship between Gibbs free energy and temperature was plotted in Figure 4.
It can be seen from Figure 4a that the Gibbs free energy of Reactions (1–4) and (6–9) kept negative in the temperature range 400–1400 °C, indicating the reactions of MgSiO3 and Na2CO3 into a variety of sodium silicates or sodium magnesium silicates were thermodynamically favorable. The starting reaction temperatures of each reaction are 764.60 °C, 596.56 °C, 750.67 °C, 917.67 °C, 916.25 °C, 965.35 °C, 868.81 °C and 707.57 °C, respectively. When the temperature was below 907.40 °C, the generation of Na2SiO3 was preferential, while the generation of Na2MgSiO4 was the first priority as the temperature exceeded 907.40 °C. Meanwhile, the Gibbs free energy of Reaction (5) kept positive, which signified the generation of Na10SiO7 was thermodynamically unfavorable in the temperature range 400–1400 °C.
Likewise, it can be seen from Figure 4b that the Gibbs free energy of Reactions (14–17) kept positive, while the others kept negative at the carbon dioxide pressure of 1atm, indicating that the reactions of M2gSiO4 and Na2CO3 into Na10SiO7, Na6Si8O19, Na2Mg2Si6O15 and Na2MgSi4O10 were thermodynamically infeasible. The starting formation temperatures of Na6Si2O7, Na2SiO3, Na2Si2O5, Na4SiO4, Na2MgSiO4 are 940.18 °C, 856.20 °C, 1184.08 °C, 1089.89 °C, 855.93 °C, respectively.
Thus, for the reaction between sodium carbonate, MgSiO3 and Mg2SiO4, the generation of Na2MgSiO4 was preferential in the temperature range 400–1400 °C, and the starting reaction temperatures are 707.57 °C and 855.93 °C, respectively.
3.1.2. Na2CO3-Mg2B2O5 System
Table 3 shows the reactions of Na2CO3-Mg2B2O5 system and their corresponding standard Gibbs free energies. The relationship between Gibbs free energy and temperature was plotted in Figure 5. The results demonstrated that the formation of NaBO2, Na4B2O5 and Na3BO3 are feasible. Among these three products, the formation of NaBO2 was preferential, and the starting reaction temperature was 1000 °C.
3.2. TG-DSC Analysis
3.2.1. Lizardite with Soda Ash
TG-DSC curves of lizardite, sodium carbonate and their mixture (molar ratio of lizardite to sodium carbonate 1:2) are shown in Figure 6.
For sodium carbonate, a mass loss occurred around 78.1 °C was owing to the dehydration of crystallization water. The thermal decomposition of sodium carbonate started from its melting point at 851 °C [19].
For lizardite, firstly, an endothermic peak appeared at 639.5 °C with the mass loss of 13.1%. This was due to the dehydroxylation of lizardite whose mass loss was 13.0% theoretically according to Equation (24). Along with the increase of temperature, an exothermic peak appeared at 811.5 °C in the DSC curves without mass loss, which was attributed to the recrystallization of forsterite [20],
Mg3Si2O5(OH)4 = Mg2SiO4 + MgSiO3 + 2H2O.
The mixture of lizardite and sodium carbonate began to lose its weight at around 60 °C and came to an end at around 1000 °C, and the total mass loss was 25.8%. Based on the molar ratio of lizardite and sodium carbonate, the theoretical total mass loss should be 25.4% according to Equation (25),
Mg3Si2O5(OH)4 + 2Na2CO3 = 2Na2MgSiO4 + 2CO2 + 2H2O + MgO.
There were three distinct mass loss peaks (78.1 °C, 639.5 °C, 851 °C) in the DTG curve during the roasting process. As the temperature increased, a rapid mass loss of 13.9% took place. This resulted from the reaction between sodium carbonate and the dehydroxylation product of lizardite, as shown in Table 2. The peak temperature of the DSC curve was 851 °C, which is the same with a melting point of sodium carbonate, illustrating that the melting of sodium carbonate accelerated this reaction.
3.2.2. Szaibelyite with Soda Ash
TG-DSC curves of szaibelyite, sodium carbonate and their mixture (molar ratio of szaibelyite to sodium carbonate is 1:1) are shown in Figure 7.
For szaibelyite, there was an endothermic peak appeared at 659 °C in the DSC curve with mass loss of 10.4%. This was due to the dehydroxylation of szaibelyite, whose mass loss was 10.7% according to Equation (26),
Mg2B2O4(OH)2 = Mg2B2O5 + H2O.
The mixture began to lose mass from around 80 °C until the temperature increased to around 760 °C. The total mass loss was 22.5%, while the theoretical mass loss was 22.6% according to Equation (27),
Mg2B2O4(OH)2 + Na2CO3 = 2NaBO2 + CO2 + H2O + 2MgO.
There were three obvious mass loss peaks (80.72 °C, 580.20 °C, 718.55 °C) in the DTG curve during the roasting process, with corresponding three endothermic peaks in the DSC curve. The mass loss peak of 7.2% at 580.20 °C was mainly due to the dehydroxylation of szaibelyite, whose theoretical mass loss was 6.4%. Compared to the DSC curve of pure szaibelyite, the dehydroxylation of szaibelyite was advanced when sodium carbonate was added.
Furthermore, a mass loss peak appeared at 718.55 °C with the mass loss of 15.1% was attributed to the reactions between the dehydroxylation products of szaibelyite and sodium carbonate, as shown in Table 3. It was worth noting that an endothermic peak at 851 °C disappeared in the DSC curve of the mixture, indicating that sodium carbonate had been completely consumed before its melting point.
3.3. Phase Transformation and Microstructure
3.3.1. Effect of Roasting Temperature
The mixtures of sodium carbonate with lizardite or szaibelyite were both roasted for 60 min in a nitrogen atmosphere at different temperatures. The molar ratio of lizardite to sodium carbonate was 1:2, while the molar ratio of szaibelyite to sodium carbonate was 1:1, and the corresponding XRD patterns are displayed in Figure 8.
The roasting temperature had a significant impact on the soda-ash roasting behavior of lizardite and szaibelyite. In Figure 8a, the main phases of the roasted sample at 600 °C were sodium carbonate and forsterite from the dehydroxylation of lizardite, and limited content of disodium magnesiosilicate (Na2MgSiO4) and periclase (MgO). The diffraction peaks of sodium carbonate and forsterite weakened and disappeared when the roasting temperature above 900 °C, along with the strengthening of the diffraction peaks of Na2MgSiO4 and MgO. The generation of a large amount of Na2MgSiO4 and MgO further demonstrated that the kinetics of the solid-state reaction between sodium carbonate and forsterite is slow, while the melting of sodium carbonate accelerated this reaction.
XRD patterns of the mixture of szaibelyite and sodium carbonate roasted at different temperatures for 60 min are shown in Figure 8b. The phase components of the roasting product at 600 °C were szaibelyite, sodium carbonate, suanite and kotoite. As the roasting temperature increased, the phases of szaibelyite and suanite disappeared, along with the appearance of the new phases of periclase and sodium borate. The disappearance of szaibelyite was owing to its dehydroxylation, leading to the formation of suanite. The new-born suanite would react with sodium carbonate to form sodium borate, according to the reactions shown in Table 3. The diffraction peaks of sodium carbonate disappeared when the roasting temperature was above 800 °C, along with the strengthened diffraction peaks of sodium borate and periclase. This phenomenon further illustrated that sodium carbonate had completely reacted with the dehydroxylation products of szaibelyite before its melting point, which was in accordance with the TG-DSC results described above. The diffraction peaks no longer changed obviously when the roasting temperature increased to 1000 °C.
Hence, raising roasting temperature was beneficial for soda-ash roasting of lizardite and szaibelyite. At a temperature lower than the melting of sodium carbonate (851 °C), the soda-ash roasting kinetics of szaibelyite was faster than that of lizardite. The melting of sodium carbonate accelerated the reaction between lizardite with sodium carbonate.
3.3.2. Effect of Roasting Time
The effect of roasting time (5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 45 min and 60 min) on the reactions of mixtures of sodium carbonate with lizardite or szaibelyite is shown in Figure 9. The experiments were performed at 1000 °C in nitrogen atmosphere, and the molar ratio of lizardite to sodium carbonate was 1:1, while the molar ratio of szaibelyite to sodium carbonate was 1:2.
Roasting time had no obvious influence on the phase composition of the roasted samples in these two systems. For the XRD patterns in Figure 9, the diffraction peaks of Na2MgSiO4 and MgO appeared obviously when the roasting time was only 5 min. Similarly, the diffraction peaks of szaibelyite and sodium carbonate disappeared completely in such a short roasting time. Therefore, the reaction between sodium carbonate and lizardite/szaibelyite were extremely fast when the roasting temperature up to 1000 °C.
3.3.3. Microstructure
SEM images and corresponding EDS results of the mixtures both roasted at 800 °C for 60 min are shown in Figure 10. The main crystalline phases of the roasted mixture of lizardite and sodium carbonate were sodium carbonate (#1) and forsterite (#2), while the main phase of the roasted mixture of szaibelyite and sodium carbonate was sodium borates (#3, #4). The results further illustrated that, at the roasting temperature of 800 °C, lizardite partially reacted with sodium carbonate while szaibelyite reacted with sodium carbonate almost thoroughly, which agreed well with the phase transformation results.
4. Conclusions
In this work, lizardite and szaibelyite were prepared, and their behaviors of soda-ash roasting were investigated in order to shed light on the soda-ash activation of boron within ludwigite ore, and to provide guidance for the extraction of boron from ludwigite ore. The conclusions were obtained as follows.
(1) Based on the thermodynamic calculation for the reaction between Na2CO3 and MgSiO3/Mg2SiO4, the generation of Na2MgSiO4 was preferential in the temperature range 400−1400 °C, and the starting reaction temperatures are 707.57 °C and 855.93 °C, respectively. While, regarding the reaction between Na2CO3 and Mg2B2O5, the formation of NaBO2 was preferential and the starting reaction temperature was 1000 °C at CO2 pressure of 1 atm.
(2) For the experimentally soda-ash roasting of lizardite or szaibelyite in nitrogen gas atmosphere, the reaction between sodium carbonate and the dehydroxylation products of lizardite (MgSiO3 and Mg2SiO4) highly depended on the melting of sodium carbonate (melting point 851 °C), giving rise to the formation of Na2MgSiO4; while for the soda-ash roasting of szaibelyite, NaBO2 was rapidly generated before the melting of sodium carbonate.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization and methodology, G.L., and M.R.; software, J.Y. and J.W.; investigation, X.Z., J.X., J.L., T.Z., and J.D.; writing X.Z., Z.P. and M.R.; funding acquisition, M.R. and T.J.
Funding
This research was funded by “the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 51804346” and “the Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 2019JJ50767”.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- An, J.; Xue, X. Life cycle environmental impact assessment of borax and boric acid production in China. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 66, 121–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, S.-Y.; Palmer, M.R.; Peng, Q.-M.; Yang, J.-H. Chemical and stable isotopic compositions of Proterozoic metamorphosed evaporites and associated tourmalines from the Houxianyu borate deposit, eastern Liaoning, China. Chem. Geol. 1997, 135, 189–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brioche, A.S. Mining Engineering—Research and Technology. In Mineral Commodity Summaries 2019; Nova Science Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 2019; 36p. [Google Scholar]
- Palmer, M.R.; Helvaci, C. The boron isotope geochemistry of the Kirka borate deposit, western Turkey. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1995, 59, 3599–3605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, Q.M.; Palmer, M.R. The paleoproterozoic Mg and Mg-Fe borate deposits of Liaoning and Jilin Provinces, northeast China. Econ. Geol. Bull. Soc. Econ. Geol. 2002, 97, 93–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.-J.; Gao, T.; Han, Y.-X. Research on processing mineralogy of paigeite. Non Ferr. Min. Metall. 2006, 22, 3. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, R.; Wang, X.J.; Gao, Y.L.; Lu, Q.; Xue, X.X. Reaction Synthesis and Oxidation Behaviours of Ludwigite. Adv. Mater. Res. 2011, 146, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.H.; Han, Y.X.; Gao, P.; Ying, P. Research on Processing Mineralogical Characterization of the Paigeite Ore. J. Northeast. Univ. 2016, 37, 258–262. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, G.; Xue, Q.; She, X.; Wang, J. Carbothermal Reduction of Boron-bearing Iron Concentrate and Melting Separation of the Reduced Pellet. ISIJ Int. 2015, 55, 751–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Xu, Y.; Jiang, T.; Zhou, M.; Wen, J.; Chen, W.; Xue, X. Effects of mechanical activation on physicochemical properties and alkaline leaching of boron concentrate. Hydrometallurgy 2017, 173, 32–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, G.; Wang, J.; Ding, Y.; Ma, S.; Xue, Q. New Separation Method of Boron and Iron from Ludwigite Based on Carbon Bearing Pellet Reduction and Melting Technology. ISIJ Int. 2012, 52, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Duan, H.M.; Lü, X.; Ning, Z.; Zhai, Y. Boron extraction from boron-concentrate ore by ammonium sulfate roasting method. J. Northeast. Univ. 2011, 32, 1724–1728. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, H.W.; Zhong, J.; Yu, T. Study on the technology of improving reactive activity of ludwigite from Wengquangou. Inorg. Chem. Ind. 2008, 40, 21–24. [Google Scholar]
- Jiang, T.; Yin, L.; Zhu, L.; Xue, X.X. Preparation of borax from boron concentrate by sodium- roasting and leaching. CIESC J. 2014, 65, 737–743. [Google Scholar]
- Li, G.; Liang, B.; Rao, M.; Zhang, Y.; Jiang, T. An innovative process for extracting boron and simultaneous recovering metallic iron from ludwigite ore. Miner. Eng. 2014, 56, 57–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qin, S.; Yin, B.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y. Leaching kinetics of szaibelyite ore in NaOH solution. Hydrometallurgy 2015, 157, 333–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qin, S.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y. Nucleation and morphology of sodium metaborate dihydrate from NaOH solution. J. Cryst. Growth 2016, 433, 143–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ning, Z.-Q.; Zhai, Y.-C.; Song, Q.-S. Extracting B2O3 from calcined boron mud using molten sodium hydroxide. Rare Met. 2015, 34, 744–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.W.; Lee, H.G. Thermal and carbothermic decomposition of Na2CO3 and Li(2)CO3. Metall. Mater. Trans. B Process Metall. Mater. Process. Sci. 2001, 32, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, B.S.; Xiong, F.W. The Influence of Serpentine Kind and Size on Sintering Process. Sinter. Pelletizing 2010, 35, 23–26. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1.
XRD patterns of as-prepared (a) lizardite and (b) szaibelyite samples.
Figure 2.
XRD results of the roasting products of lizardite (a) and szaibelyite (b).
Figure 3.
Schematic diagram of the equipment for soda-ash roasting.
Figure 4.
Plots of Gibbs free energy against the temperature of (a) Na2CO3-MgSiO3 and (b) Na2CO3-Mg2SiO4.
Figure 4.
Plots of Gibbs free energy against the temperature of (a) Na2CO3-MgSiO3 and (b) Na2CO3-Mg2SiO4.
Figure 5.
Plots of Gibbs free energy against the temperature of Na2CO3-Mg2B2O5.
Figure 6.
Thermogravimetric-differential scanning calorimetry (TG-DSC) curves of lizardite, sodium carbonate and the mixture of lizardite and sodium carbonate (argon atmosphere, 10 °C/min).
Figure 6.
Thermogravimetric-differential scanning calorimetry (TG-DSC) curves of lizardite, sodium carbonate and the mixture of lizardite and sodium carbonate (argon atmosphere, 10 °C/min).
Figure 7.
TG-DSC curves of szaibelyite, sodium carbonate and the mixture of szaibelyite and sodium carbonate (argon atmosphere, 10 °C/min).
Figure 7.
TG-DSC curves of szaibelyite, sodium carbonate and the mixture of szaibelyite and sodium carbonate (argon atmosphere, 10 °C/min).
Figure 8.
XRD patterns of (a) mixture of lizardite and sodium carbonate (lizardite to sodium carbonate molar ratio 1:2) and (b) mixture of szaibelyite and carbonate (szaibelyite to sodium carbonate molar ratio 1:1) at different temperatures for 60 min in a nitrogen atmosphere. Sc—Sodium carbonate (Na2CO3); Fo—Forsterite (Mg2SiO4); Dm—Disodium magnesiosilicate (Na2MgSiO4); P—Periclase (MgO); Sz—szaibelyite (Mg2B2O4(OH)2); Su—suanite (Mg2B2O5); Ko—kotoite (Mg3B2O6); Sb—Sodium borate.
Figure 8.
XRD patterns of (a) mixture of lizardite and sodium carbonate (lizardite to sodium carbonate molar ratio 1:2) and (b) mixture of szaibelyite and carbonate (szaibelyite to sodium carbonate molar ratio 1:1) at different temperatures for 60 min in a nitrogen atmosphere. Sc—Sodium carbonate (Na2CO3); Fo—Forsterite (Mg2SiO4); Dm—Disodium magnesiosilicate (Na2MgSiO4); P—Periclase (MgO); Sz—szaibelyite (Mg2B2O4(OH)2); Su—suanite (Mg2B2O5); Ko—kotoite (Mg3B2O6); Sb—Sodium borate.
Figure 9.
XRD patterns (a) mixture of lizardite and sodium carbonate (lizardite to sodium carbonate molar ratio 1:2) and (b) mixture of szaibelyite and carbonate (szaibelyite to sodium carbonate molar ratio 1:1) roasted at 1000 °C for a different time in nitrogen atmosphere. Dm—Disodium magnesiosilicate (Na2MgSiO4); P—Periclase (MgO); Sb—Sodium borate.
Figure 9.
XRD patterns (a) mixture of lizardite and sodium carbonate (lizardite to sodium carbonate molar ratio 1:2) and (b) mixture of szaibelyite and carbonate (szaibelyite to sodium carbonate molar ratio 1:1) roasted at 1000 °C for a different time in nitrogen atmosphere. Dm—Disodium magnesiosilicate (Na2MgSiO4); P—Periclase (MgO); Sb—Sodium borate.
Figure 10.
SEM-EDS results of (a) mixture of lizardite and sodium carbonate with molar ratio of 1:2 and, (b) mixture of szaibelyite and sodium carbonate with molar ratio of 1:1, roasted at 800 °C for 60 min in a nitrogen atmosphere. a1 and b1 are the partial enlarged details corresponding to a and b, respectively.
Figure 10.
SEM-EDS results of (a) mixture of lizardite and sodium carbonate with molar ratio of 1:2 and, (b) mixture of szaibelyite and sodium carbonate with molar ratio of 1:1, roasted at 800 °C for 60 min in a nitrogen atmosphere. a1 and b1 are the partial enlarged details corresponding to a and b, respectively.
Table 1.
Main chemical composition of as-prepared lizardite and szaibelyite (wt.%).
| Samples | TFe | B2O3 | SiO2 | CaO | MgO | K2O |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lizardite | 5.50 | ND* | 37.36 | 1.24 | 41.82 | 0.04 |
| Szaibelyite | 1.87 | 39.16 | 0.74 | 0.88 | 46.21 | 0.15 |
ND*: Not detected.
Table 2.
∆rGmΘ − T equations of Na2CO3-MgO-SiO2 system during roasting (400 °C < T < 1400 °C).
| Reaction | Equation | ∆rGmΘ − T (kJ·mol−1) |
|---|---|---|
| (1) | 2/3MgSiO3 + Na2CO3 = 1/3Na6Si2O7 + 2/3MgO + CO2(g) | 76.46 − 0.10T |
| (2) | MgSiO3 + Na2CO3 = Na2SiO3 + MgO + CO2(g) | 53.69 − 0.09T |
| (3) | 2MgSiO3 + Na2CO3 = Na2Si2O5 + 2MgO + CO2(g) | 90.08 − 0.12T |
| (4) | 1/2MgSiO3 + Na2CO3 = 1/2Na4SiO4 + 1/2MgO + CO2(g) | 82.59 − 0.09T |
| (5) | 1/5MgSiO3 + Na2CO3 = 1/5Na10SiO7 + 1/5MgO + CO2(g) | 213.66 − 0.13T |
| (6) | 8/3MgSiO3 + Na2CO3 = 1/3Na6Si8O19 + 8/3MgO + CO2(g) | 109.95 − 0.12T |
| (7) | 6MgSiO3 + Na2CO3 = Na2Mg2Si6O15 + 4MgO + CO2(g) | 193.07 − 0.20T |
| (8) | 4MgSiO3 + Na2CO3 = Na2MgSi4O10 + 3MgO + CO2(g) | 139.01 − 0.16T |
| (9) | MgSiO3 + Na2CO3 = Na2MgSiO4 + CO2(g) | 99.06 − 0.14T |
| (10) | 2/3Mg2SiO4 + Na2CO3 = 1/3Na6Si2O7 + 4/3MgO + CO2(g) | 103.42 − 0.11T |
| (11) | Mg2SiO4 + Na2CO3 = Na2SiO3 + 2MgO + CO2(g) | 85.62 − 0.10T |
| (12) | 2Mg2SiO4 + Na2CO3 = Na2Si2O5 + 4MgO + CO2(g) | 153.93 − 0.13T |
| (13) | 1/2Mg2SiO4 + Na2CO3 = 1/2Na4SiO4 + MgO + CO2(g) | 98.09 − 0.09T |
| (14) | 1/5Mg2SiO4 + Na2CO3 = 1/5Na10SiO7 + 2/5MgO + CO2(g) | 219.61 − 0.13T |
| (15) | 8/3Mg2SiO4 + Na2CO3 = 1/3Na6Si8O19 + 16/3MgO + CO2(g) | 194.65 − 0.13T |
| (16) | 6Mg2SiO4 + Na2CO3 = Na2Mg2Si6O15 + 10MgO + CO2(g) | 384.16 − 0.22T |
| (17) | 4Mg2SiO4 + Na2CO3 = Na2MgSi4O10 + 7MgO + CO2(g) | 266.27 − 0.18T |
| (18) | Mg2SiO4 + Na2CO3 = Na2MgSiO4 + MgO + CO2(g) | 128.39 − 0.15T |
Table 3.
∆rGmΘ − T equations of Na2CO3-Mg2B2O5 system during roasting (400 °C < T < 1400 °C).
| Reaction | Equation | ∆rGmΘ − T (kJ·mol−1) |
|---|---|---|
| (19) | Mg2B2O5 + Na2CO3 = 2NaBO2 +2MgO + CO2(g) | 130.16 − 0.13T |
| (20) | 1/3Mg2B2O5 + Na2CO3 = 2/3Na3BO3 +2/3MgO + CO2(g) | 133.03 − 0.10T |
| (21) | 1/2Mg2B2O5 + Na2CO3 = 1/2Na4B2O5 + MgO + CO2(g) | 145.77 − 0.14T |
| (22) | 2Mg2B2O5 + Na2CO3 = Na2B4O7 + 4MgO + CO2(g) | 174.42 − 0.07T |
| (23) | 3Mg2B2O5 + Na2CO3 = 2NaB3O5 + 6MgO + CO2(g) | 256.21 − 0.05T |
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Zhang, X.; Li, G.; You, J.; Wang, J.; Luo, J.; Duan, J.; Zhang, T.; Peng, Z.; Rao, M.; Jiang, T. Extraction of Boron from Ludwigite Ore: Mechanism of Soda-Ash Roasting of Lizardite and Szaibelyite. Minerals 2019, 9, 533. https://doi.org/10.3390/min9090533
AMA Style
Zhang X, Li G, You J, Wang J, Luo J, Duan J, Zhang T, Peng Z, Rao M, Jiang T. Extraction of Boron from Ludwigite Ore: Mechanism of Soda-Ash Roasting of Lizardite and Szaibelyite. Minerals. 2019; 9(9):533. https://doi.org/10.3390/min9090533
Chicago/Turabian StyleZhang, Xin, Guanghui Li, Jinxiang You, Jian Wang, Jun Luo, Jiaoyang Duan, Tao Zhang, Zhiwei Peng, Mingjun Rao, and Tao Jiang. 2019. "Extraction of Boron from Ludwigite Ore: Mechanism of Soda-Ash Roasting of Lizardite and Szaibelyite" Minerals 9, no. 9: 533. https://doi.org/10.3390/min9090533
APA StyleZhang, X., Li, G., You, J., Wang, J., Luo, J., Duan, J., Zhang, T., Peng, Z., Rao, M., & Jiang, T. (2019). Extraction of Boron from Ludwigite Ore: Mechanism of Soda-Ash Roasting of Lizardite and Szaibelyite. Minerals, 9(9), 533. https://doi.org/10.3390/min9090533
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
