Next Article in Journal
Environmental Impact of Mine Exploitation: An Early Predictive Methodology Based on Ore Mineralogy and Contaminant Speciation
Next Article in Special Issue
Patynite, NaKCa4[Si9O23], a New Mineral from the Patynskiy Massif, Southern Siberia, Russia
Previous Article in Journal
Fluid Evolution and Ore Genesis of the Qibaoshan Polymetallic Ore Field, Shandong Province, China: Constraints from Fluid Inclusions and H–O–S Isotopic Compositions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Structural Trends and Solid-Solutions Based on the Crystal Chemistry of Two Hausmannite (Mn3O4) Samples from the Kalahari Manganese Field
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Crystal Chemistry of Birefringent Uvarovite Solid Solutions

by
Sytle M. Antao
* and
Jeffrey J. Salvador
Department of Geoscience, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2019, 9(7), 395; https://doi.org/10.3390/min9070395
Submission received: 28 May 2019 / Revised: 17 June 2019 / Accepted: 27 June 2019 / Published: 28 June 2019

Abstract

The crystal chemistry of five optically anisotropic uvarovite samples from different localities (California, Finland, Russia, and Switzerland) were studied with electron-probe microanalysis (EPMA) and the Rietveld method. Monochromatic synchrotron high-resolution powder X-ray diffraction (HRPXRD) data were used, and Rietveld refinement was carried out with the cubic space group, I a 3 ¯ d . The general formula for garnet is [8]X3[6]Y2[4]Z3[4]O12. Uvarovite has the ideal formula, Ca3Cr2Si3O12, which may be written as Ca3{Cr,Al,Fe}Σ2[Si3O12] because of solid solutions. HRPXRD traces show multiple cubic garnet phases in each sample that has a heterogeneous chemical composition. The optical and back-scattered electron (BSE) images and elemental maps contain lamellar and concentric zoning as well as patchy intergrowths. With increasing a unit-cell parameter for uvarovite solid solutions, the Z–O distance remains constant, and the average <X–O> distance increases slightly in response to the Cr3+ ⇔ Al3+ cation substitution in the Y site. The Y–O distance increases most because Cr3+ (radius = 0.615 Å) is larger than Al3+ (radius = 0.545 Å) cations. The Fe3+ (radius = 0.645 Å) cation is also involved in this substitution. Structural mismatch between the cubic garnet phases in the samples gives rise to strain-induced optical anisotropy.
Keywords: uvarovite; grossular; andradite; garnet; optical anisotropy; intergrowths of multiple cubic phases; Rietveld refinements; Synchrotron high-resolution powder X-ray diffraction (HRPXRD); structure; chemistry uvarovite; grossular; andradite; garnet; optical anisotropy; intergrowths of multiple cubic phases; Rietveld refinements; Synchrotron high-resolution powder X-ray diffraction (HRPXRD); structure; chemistry

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Antao, S.M.; Salvador, J.J. Crystal Chemistry of Birefringent Uvarovite Solid Solutions. Minerals 2019, 9, 395. https://doi.org/10.3390/min9070395

AMA Style

Antao SM, Salvador JJ. Crystal Chemistry of Birefringent Uvarovite Solid Solutions. Minerals. 2019; 9(7):395. https://doi.org/10.3390/min9070395

Chicago/Turabian Style

Antao, Sytle M., and Jeffrey J. Salvador. 2019. "Crystal Chemistry of Birefringent Uvarovite Solid Solutions" Minerals 9, no. 7: 395. https://doi.org/10.3390/min9070395

APA Style

Antao, S. M., & Salvador, J. J. (2019). Crystal Chemistry of Birefringent Uvarovite Solid Solutions. Minerals, 9(7), 395. https://doi.org/10.3390/min9070395

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop