Next Article in Journal
The Carbon and Nitrogen Isotope Characteristics of Type Ib-IaA Cuboid Diamonds from Alluvial Placers in the Northeastern Siberian Platform
Next Article in Special Issue
Remote Sensing for Mineral Exploration in Central Portugal
Previous Article in Journal
Factors Affecting the Upgrading of a Nickeliferous Limonitic Laterite Ore by Reduction Roasting, Thermal Growth and Magnetic Separation
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Review of the Carbon Footprint of Cu and Zn Production from Primary and Secondary Sources

Further Investigations on Simultaneous Ultrasonic Coal Flotation

Mining Engineering Department, Engineering Faculty, Istanbul University, Avcilar, Istanbul 34320, Turkey
Minerals 2017, 7(10), 177;
Received: 30 August 2017 / Revised: 17 September 2017 / Accepted: 19 September 2017 / Published: 22 September 2017
This study investigates the flotation performance of a representative hard coal slime sample (d80 particle size of minus 0.2 mm) obtained from the Prosper-Haniel coal preparation plant located in Bottrop, Germany. Flotation was carried out with a newly designed flotation cell refurbished from an old ultrasonic cleaning bath (2.5 L volume) equipped with a single frequency (35 kHz) and two different power levels (80–160 W) and a sub-aeration-type flotation machine operating at a stable impeller speed (1200 rpm) and air rate (2.5 L/min). The reagent combination for conventional and simultaneous ultrasonic coal flotation tests was Ekofol-440 at variable dosages (40–300 g/t) with controlling water temperature (20–25 °C) at natural pH (6.5–7.0). The batch coal flotation results were analyzed by comparing the combustible recovery (%) and separation efficiency (%) values, taking mass yield and ash concentrations of the froths and tailings into account. It was found that simultaneous ultrasonic coal flotation increased yield and recovery values of the floated products with lower ash values than the conventional flotation despite using similar reagent dosages. Furthermore, particle size distribution of the ultrasonically treated and untreated coals was measured. Finely distributed coal particles seemed to be agglomerated during the ultrasonic treatment, while ash-forming slimes were removed by hydrodynamic cavitation. View Full-Text
Keywords: ultrasonic coal flotation; ultrasound; ultrasonics; simultaneous ultrasonic treatment; cavitation ultrasonic coal flotation; ultrasound; ultrasonics; simultaneous ultrasonic treatment; cavitation
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Ozkan, S.G. Further Investigations on Simultaneous Ultrasonic Coal Flotation. Minerals 2017, 7, 177.

AMA Style

Ozkan SG. Further Investigations on Simultaneous Ultrasonic Coal Flotation. Minerals. 2017; 7(10):177.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ozkan, Safak Gokhan. 2017. "Further Investigations on Simultaneous Ultrasonic Coal Flotation" Minerals 7, no. 10: 177.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop