Next Article in Journal
Platinum Group Minerals in Sulfide Droplets of the Zhelos Intrusion, Eastern Sayn, Russia: First Data
Previous Article in Journal
Geochronology, Geochemistry, and Tectonic Significance of Early Carboniferous Volcanic Rocks from the Ulanhot Region in the Central Great Xing’an Range
Previous Article in Special Issue
Study on the Recovery of Rubidium from Lepidolite Slag by Sulfuric Acid Leaching
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Effects of Graphite on the Leaching Behaviors of Active Materials of Lithium-Ion Batteries During Sulfuric Acid Roasting

1
Department of Energy and Resources Engineering, National Korea Maritime and Ocean University, Busan 49112, Republic of Korea
2
R&D Center, Sungeel Hitech Co., Ltd., Gunsan 54002, Republic of Korea
3
WA School of Mines: Minerals, Energy and Chemical Engineering, Curtin University, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2025, 15(6), 611; https://doi.org/10.3390/min15060611
Submission received: 5 May 2025 / Revised: 27 May 2025 / Accepted: 3 June 2025 / Published: 5 June 2025

Abstract

This study investigated the detrimental effect of graphite on metal recovery during sulfuric acid roasting of lithium-ion battery materials. While sulfuric acid roasting of black mass achieved excellent leaching efficiencies (>99%) for nickel and cobalt at 250 °C, higher roasting temperatures significantly reduced their recovery to 84.9% and 93.1% at 400 °C, respectively. The key finding reveals that graphite accelerates sulfuric acid decomposition during roasting, consuming acid that would otherwise be available for metal sulfate formation. Weight-loss measurements confirmed this mechanism, showing increased acid decomposition with higher graphite content. Despite requiring three times the theoretical acid dosage (0.45 vs. 0.15 mole) for complete conversion, the process remained insufficient at elevated temperatures when graphite was present. These findings demonstrate that graphite interference is a critical factor limiting the efficiency of sulfuric acid roasting for lithium-ion battery recycling, necessitating lower roasting temperatures (around 250 °C) to maintain acceptable metal recovery efficiencies.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The Paris Agreement, adopted at UNFCCC COP21 in December 2015 and enforced from November 2016, aims to limit global warming to 1.5 °C, which led the Korean government to declare Carbon Neutrality in 2020 and establish the ‘2050 Carbon Neutrality Scenario’ that promotes electric vehicles as part of its strategy to reduce carbon emissions from transportation [1,2]. The battery demand and supply outlook of global electric vehicles, reported by SNE research, indicates that electric vehicle battery demand is projected to grow more than 20 times from 197 GWh in 2020 to 4028 GWh by 2030 [2,3]. The EU Battery Regulation implemented in 2024 applies to various batteries sold within the EU region, including industrial and electric vehicle batteries, mandating specific percentages of recycled metals: 16% cobalt, 6% lithium, and 6% nickel by August 2031, increasing to 26% cobalt, 12% lithium, and 15% nickel by August 2036 [2].
With this increasing demand for electric vehicle batteries and stringent recycling requirements, efficient battery recycling systems are becoming essential for sustainable resource management [1,2,3,4,5]. Korea, a resource-poor country that imports over 99% of its metal resources, has promoted recycling industries for a stable resource supply [6]. Sungeel Hitech Co., Ltd., a leading lithium-ion battery recycler, has been operating commercial processes since 2011 using technology acquired through government-supported R&D projects, with its recycling process distinctly divided into preprocessing (“Recycling Park”) and hydrometallurgical (“Hydrocenter”) operations [2]. Though successfully operating its recycling business since 2011, recently new recycling processes are being developed to improve efficiency by addressing limitations in Sungeel Hitech’s current methods, particularly challenges associated with hydrogen peroxide usage [7,8]. Various alternative recycling technologies are emerging to overcome these process difficulties and enhance overall operational performance in lithium-ion battery recycling [1,2,9,10,11,12,13]. Pyrometallurgical processes have already been commercialized as alternatives to conventional recycling methods [12], and research on individual sub-processes has been conducted to replace conventional lithium-ion battery recycling processes [9,10], including the recovery of previously discarded graphite [13]. Recently, considerable attention has been given to the fact that the efficiency of post-treatment processes is largely determined by pre-treatment processes, leading to extensive research focused on optimizing pre-treatment procedures [1,2,9,10].
Since Sungeel Hitech’s recycling process includes thermal treatment steps conducted at approximately 700 °C, roasting processes that produce various intermediate products at similar temperature ranges have been extensively studied. In Figure 1, these alternative recycling processes involving roasting are summarized [2]. As lithium-ion battery recycling processes produce metal compounds such as sulfates, carbonates, and hydroxides for use as lithium-ion battery raw materials [2,4,9], these processes can be classified according to the type of intermediate products. Various recycling processes have been researched to replace Sungeel Hitech’s current process, which produces black mass through a combination of physical separation and thermal treatment.
Sulfuric acid roasting processes have been developed for the intermediate processing of lithium and rare earth ores, with commercial processes currently in use [14,15]. Recently, sulfuric acid roasting has been investigated to recover lithium selectively [16,17,18] or graphite [19] from spent lithium-ion batteries. In these processes, sulfuric acid is mixed with lithium-ion battery materials, dried at 130 °C, and subsequently subjected to a roasting treatment [16,17,18,19]. Although spent lithium-ion batteries contain a complex mixture of cathode materials (primarily lithium metal oxides containing Ni, Co, and Mn) and anode materials (predominantly graphite), the effects of graphite have not been examined during LIB recycling processes.
In the present study, LIB samples were mixed with sulfuric acid and directly subjected to the roasting process without a preliminary drying step, followed by water leaching to observe the leaching behavior of major metals such as Li, Ni, Co, and Mn. In particular, this study investigated the effects of graphite being present during the roasting process on metal dissolution.

2. Materials and Methods

Two types of samples were utilized in this study: cathode active material scrap powder sourced from a Korean cell manufacturer and black mass obtained from a Korean recycling company. The black mass represents a mixture of cathode and anode active materials recovered from processed waste batteries. For initial metal content analysis, both samples underwent acid digestion using aqua regia at 200 °C for 2 h in a microwave digestion system (Milestone ETHOS UP, Milestone S.r.l., Sorisole, Italy). The digested solutions were analyzed using Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometry (ICP-OES, Perkin Elmer OPTIMA 8300) to analyze the metal content, including lithium, nickel, cobalt, and manganese and the metal contents are shown in Table 1. These compositional data indicate that the cathode scrap consists of a mixture of NCM111 and NCM 622, while the black mass appears to be derived from NCM 622 and NCM811 materials. The sulfuric acid (Junsei Chemical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) with 95% purity and graphite powder (Samchun Pure Chemical Co., Ltd., Pyeongtaek, Republic of Korea) of chemical grade were used for the sulfation roasting process, and all other reagents used were of analytical grade.
In a typical run, 10 g of LIB sample was mixed with 10 mL to 30 mL of sulfuric acid in a quartz crucible and then set in a muffle furnace (FHX-12, DAIHAN Scientific Co., Ltd., Wonju, Republic of Korea). The temperature gradually increased from 250 °C to 600 °C at a heating rate of 2 °C/min for the roasting process. Upon reaching the target temperature, roasting continued while maintaining this temperature for one hour. The 10 g of roasted product was added to 200 mL distilled-deionized water (DDW), and then leaching tests were performed at 30 °C–70 °C in temperature and 200 rpm in agitation speed for 60 min. In preliminary tests, the leaching efficiency showed no significant changes after 15 min, and the effect of stirring speed on leaching efficiency was negligible. Therefore, in this study, the leaching time was fixed at 1 h and the stirring speed was maintained at 200 rpm.
After the leaching test, the metal concentration in the leach solution were measured with ICP-OES (OPTIMA 8300, Perkin Elmer Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) and the metal content in the leach residue was analyzed with the ICP-OES after the residue was digested with aqua regia. The leaching efficiencies of metals such as Li, Ni, Co, Mn were obtained using the following equation.
Leaching efficiency (%) = Msolution/(Msolution + Mresidue) × 100
where Msolution and Mresidue represent the mass of metals in the leach solution and residue, respectively. The roasted product was analyzed with an X-ray diffractometer (SmartLab, Rigaku Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) with Cu Kα radiation. The patterns were recorded in the 2θ range of 10–80° with a step size of 0.5°.

3. Results and Discussion

The boiling point of sulfuric acid has been found to be 337 °C. The effect of temperature on the sulfuric acid roasting was investigated in the temperature range from 300 °C to 600 °C. The sulfuric acid roasting was performed with the mixture of 10 g of cathode active material scrap powder and 15 mL of 95% sulfuric acid for 1 h. The leaching test was conducted at 50 °C and 200 rpm with 5% pulp density for 1 h. The leaching results at roasting temperatures from 300 °C to 600 °C are shown in Figure 2. The leaching efficiencies of all metals (Li, Ni, Co, and Mn) reached at least 99.5% across the entire tested roasting temperature range (300–600 °C). The XRD pattern shows the presence of NiSO4, Li2SO4, and CoSO4 as the main crystalline phases. Despite the high leaching efficiencies of manganese observed in our experiments, the characteristic peaks of MnSO4 were not clearly identified in the XRD pattern. This result indicates that the metals are successfully dissolved by the recycling process consisting of roasting and water leaching, and that the optimal roasting temperature was determined to be 300 °C under these roasting conditions.
The reaction between LIB samples and sulfuric acid results in the formation of metal sulfates as follows [16].
4LiMeO2 + 6H2SO4 = 2Li2SO4 + 4MeSO4 + 6H2O + O2
where Me represents the transition metals such as Ni, Co, and Mn, which exist as NixCoyMnz (x + y + z = 1). Figure 3 shows the XRD pattern of product roasted at 500 °C. This XRD pattern indicates that the metals except Mn in cathode scrap were converted into sulfate forms. Since these metal sulfates can be dissolved in water, high leaching efficiencies can be obtained, as reported in Figure 2.
The effect of mixing ratio on sulfuric acid roasting was investigated by preparing mixtures containing 10 g of cathode scrap with varying amounts (10–30 mL) of 95% sulfuric acid. The sulfuric-acid roasting was performed with the mixture of 10 g of cathode active material scrap powder and 15 mL to 30 mL of 95% sulfuric acid at 350 °C for 1 h. The leaching test was conducted at 50 °C and 200 rpm with 5% pulp density for 1 h. As can be seen in Figure 4, lithium showed leaching efficiencies exceeding 99.9% under all mixing ratio conditions; however, the other three metals (nickel, cobalt, and manganese) did not achieve 99.9% leaching efficiency when mixed with only 10 mL of sulfuric acid. Notably, cobalt exhibited leaching efficiencies of 89.4% and 99.5% when mixed with 10 mL and 15 mL of sulfuric acid, respectively. When the sulfuric acid amount was increased to 25 mL, all four metals achieved leaching efficiencies above 99.9%. Based on the weighted average atomic mass of Ni, Co, and Mn (calculated to be 57.8 g/mol), the 10 g of cathode scrap containing these metals is equivalent to approximately 0.1 mole. Lithium sulfate (Li2SO4) has a 1:2 molar ratio between lithium and sulfate, while metal sulfates such as NiSO4 maintain a 1:1 molar ratio. Theoretically, 0.15 mole of sulfuric acid is required to convert the metals such as Li, Ni, Co, and Mn in the cathode scrap into their respective sulfates. Although 10 mL of 95% sulfuric acid corresponds to 0.18 mole, which is theoretically sufficient, the experimental results showed that this amount was inadequate for complete conversion. A significantly higher amount of 25 mL (0.45 mole) of sulfuric acid was required to achieve complete metal sulfate formation, which corresponds to three times the theoretical stoichiometric requirement of 0.15 mole.
The leaching tests were performed at 20~50 °C and 200 rpm with 5% pulp density for 1 h, using the product roasted at 500 °C for 1 h with 3 mL H2SO4/g sample to investigate the effect of leaching temperature on the leaching efficiencies. Figure 5 shows clearly that leaching efficiencies increased with increasing temperature, where the leching efficiencies reached 99.9% at temperatures of 50 °C and above.
Generally, black mass contains graphite as anode active materials as well as cathode active materials. Although research on the recovery of graphite from black mass using a flotation process was performed [20], the separation of cathode and anode active materials is not currently a standard process. Therefore, a recycling process consisting of sulfuric acid roasting followed by water leaching was tested with the black mass sample. The sulfuric acid roasting was performed with a mixture of 10 g of cathode active material scrap powder and 25 mL of 95% sulfuric acid for 1 h. The leaching test was conducted at 50 °C and 200 rpm with 5% pulp density for 1 h. The leaching results at roasting temperatures from 250 °C to 400 °C are shown in Figure 6. The leaching efficiencies decreased with increasing roasting temperature from 250 °C to 400 °C, with nickel and cobalt achieving >99% recovery at 250 °C but declining to 84.9% and 93.1%, respectively, at 400 °C roasting temperature. The black mass was obtained by dismantling and crushing a spent battery pack, while the cathode scrap was obtained from battery manufacturing processes. Therefore, another sample was prepared by adding graphite reagent to the cathode scrap to investigate the effect of graphite on the sulfuric acid roasting process.
Two kinds of samples were prepared, one consisting of 10 g of cathode scrap (without graphite) and the other containing 5 g of cathode scrap and 5 g of graphite powder (with graphite). The samples were roasted at 350 °C for 1 h with 2.5 mL H2SO4/g sample, and subsequently leached at 50 °C and 200 rpm with 5% pulp density for 1 h. As shown in Figure 7, the cathode scrap without graphite exhibited leaching efficiencies exceeding 99.9%, whereas the samples containing graphite showed comparatively lower leaching efficiencies for nickel and cobalt at 91.6% and 93.4%, respectively. Despite the graphite-containing samples having only half the amount of cathode material (5 g) and therefore receiving twice the relative sulfuric acid dosage, they demonstrated lower leaching efficiencies. This suggests that the presence of graphite adversely affects the leaching efficiencies of metals.
The effect of graphite on sulfuric acid decomposition was investigated as follows: Samples were prepared by adding varying amounts of graphite (0–7 g) to 25 mL of sulfuric acid, and subsequently, the samples were roasted at 350 °C for 30 min. The weights before and after roasting were measured to calculate the amount of decomposed sulfuric acid, and the results are presented in Figure 8. The amount of decomposed sulfuric acid increased with increasing graphite content, indicating that graphite addition accelerates the decomposition of sulfuric acid.
Another test was performed to investigate the effect of graphite addition on the decomposition of sulfuric acid at 300 °C for 20 min with 1 g sulfuric acid with or without 0.5 g graphite. As shown in Figure 9, the remaining sulfuric acid was 77.6% in the sample with graphite and 94.5% in the sample without graphite, demonstrating the accelerating effect of graphite on sulfuric acid decomposition.
The decomposition reaction of sulfuric acid results in the formation of sulfur trioxide and water as follows [21].
H2SO4 = SO3 + H2O
This reaction primarily occurs at 350 °C [21], although the process has been known to initiate gradually at temperatures as low as 300 °C, which was confirmed in the results shown in Figure 9. Also, the reduction of sulfuric acid was reported as follows [22].
C + 2H2SO4 = CO2 + 2SO2 + 2H2O
Although the precise temperature range for this reaction has not been scientifically established in the reference [22], experimental evidence indicates that carbon functions as a reducing agent, facilitating the decomposition of sulfuric acid into SO2. Therefore, the presence of graphite accelerates the decomposition of sulfuric acid, which results in insufficient sulfuric acid for complete conversion of metals in the cathode material to sulfates, consequently leading to decreased leaching efficiencies.
Through the process proposed in this research, we have successfully obtained a leach solution containing lithium, nickel, cobalt, and manganese. Since Sungeel Hitech has already commercialized a process that uses solvent extraction and selective precipitation to separate these components from similar leach solutions and convert them into battery raw materials [1,2], applying these established commercial processes to our leach solution would effectively separate the individual metals without significant challenges. This connection to conventional industrial processes demonstrates the practical applicability of our research findings in a commercial context.

4. Conclusions

This study investigated the effect of graphite on metal recovery during sulfuric acid roasting of black mass from lithium-ion batteries through a comprehensive recycling process. The sulfuric acid roasting process achieved excellent metal recovery from black mass at 250 °C, with leaching efficiencies exceeding 99% for nickel and cobalt, but its performance deteriorated significantly at higher temperatures (84.9% and 93.1% at 400 °C, respectively). Experimental results revealed that three times the theoretical stoichiometric requirement (0.45 vs. 0.15 mole) was necessary for adequate metal sulfate formation. The most significant finding was that the presence of graphite creates temperature-dependent competitive reactions that compromise process efficiency at elevated temperatures. The underlying mechanism was identified as graphite-accelerated sulfuric acid decomposition during roasting, which consumes acid that would otherwise be available for metal sulfate formation. This competitive reaction fundamentally alters the process chemistry and limits metal recovery efficiency at higher temperatures. These findings have critical implications for industrial black mass recycling, demonstrating that lower roasting temperatures (around 250 °C) are essential to maintain acceptable metal recovery rates above 99% in graphite-containing systems.

Author Contributions

Methodology, H.C., I.J., J.P. and K.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, H.C. and K.Y.; writing—review and editing, K.Y. and R.D.A.; project administration, K.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Technology Innovation Program (or Industrial Strategic Technology Development Program—Development of Material Component Technology) (20011176, Development of Advanced Technology in Hydrometallurgy for High Added Value of Resources Recovery) funded by the Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy (MOTIE, Korea).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

Heeyoung Choi graduated from National Korea Maritime and Ocean University and now is employed by the company R&D Center, Sungeel Hitech Co., Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yoo, K. Lithium Ion Battery Recycling Industry in South Korea. Resour. Recycl. 2023, 32, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yoo, K.; Heo, W.; Kim, B. The Enhancement of Recycling Processes Efficiency of Lithium Ion Batteries; A Review. Resour. Recycl. 2024, 33, 24–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kim, D.W.; Kim, H.S.; Choi, H.L. Comprehensive Review on Wet Recycling methods for LiFePO4 Batteries. Resour. Recycl. 2024, 33, 28–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Panda, N.; Cueva-Sola, A.B.; Dzulqornain, A.M.; Thenepalli, T.; Lee, J.Y.; Yoon, H.S.; Jyothi, R.K. Review on lithium ion battery recycling: Challenges and possibilities. Geosyst. Eng. 2023, 26, 101–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lim, Y.; Choi, J.; Yoo, K.; Lee, S.H. Feasibility study on the use of magnetic susceptibility for recovery of vanadium component in magnetite. Geosyst. Eng. 2022, 25, 280–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lee, S.H.; Yoo, K. Waste and Recycling Status of Europe, Japan and USA. Resour. Recycl. 2021, 30, 92–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lee, S.H.; Yoo, K.; Jha, M.K.; Lee, J.C. Separation of Sn from waste Pb-free Sn–Ag–Cu solder in hydrochloric acid solution with ferric chloride. Hydrometallurgy 2015, 157, 184–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kim, S.K.; Lee, J.C.; Yoo, K. Leaching of tin from waste Pb-free solder in hydrochloric acid solution with stannic chloride. Hydrometallurgy 2016, 165, 143–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ahn, Y.; Koo, W.; Yoo, K.; Alorro, R.D. Carbothermic reduction roasting of cathode active materials using activated carbon and graphite to enhance the sulfuric-acid-leaching efficiency of nickel and cobalt. Minerals 2022, 12, 1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yan, S.X.; Jiang, Y.Z.; Chen, X.P.; Yuan, L.; Min, T.T.; Cao, Y.; Peng, W.L.; Zhou, T. Engineering classification recycling of spent lithium-ion batteries through pretreatment: A comprehensive review from laboratory to scale-up application. Rare Met. 2024, 43, 915–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liao, H.; Zhang, S.; Liu, B.; He, X.; Deng, J.; Ding, Y. Valuable metals recovery from spent ternary lithium-ion battery: A review. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater. 2024, 31, 2556–2581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lee, J.; Park, K.W.; Sohn, I.; Lee, S. Pyrometallurgical recycling of end-of-life lithium-ion batteries. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater. 2024, 31, 1554–1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, L.; Wang, C.; Zhang, J.Y.; Qiu, J.C.; Fu, X.W.; Zhang, Z.R.; Feng, J.M.; Dong, L.; Long, C.L.; Li, D.J.; et al. Graphite recycling from spent lithium-ion batteries for fabrication of high-performance aluminum-ion batteries. Rare Met. 2024, 43, 2161–2171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jha, M.K.; Kumari, A.; Panda, R.; Kumar, J.R.; Yoo, K.; Lee, J.Y. Review on hydrometallurgical recovery of rare earth metals. Hydrometallurgy 2016, 165, 2–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Salakjani, N.K.; Singh, P.; Nikoloski, A.N. Acid roasting of spodumene: Microwave vs. conventional heating. Miner. Eng. 2019, 138, 161–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lin, J.; Li, L.; Fan, E.; Liu, C.; Zhang, X.; Cao, H.; Sun, Z.; Chen, R. Conversion mechanisms of selective extraction of lithium from spent lithium-ion batteries by sulfation roasting. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 18482–18489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Lin, J.; Liu, C.; Cao, H.; Chen, R.; Yang, Y.; Li, L.; Sun, Z. Environmentally benign process for selective recovery of valuable metals from spent lithium-ion batteries by using conventional sulfation roasting. Green Chem. 2019, 21, 5904–5913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Deng, H.; Wang, B.; Xu, J.; Wu, Y.; Yang, G.; Shi, Z.; He, W.; Li, G. Selective lithium recovery from waste lithium-ion batteries by H2SO4 roasting focused on process intensification and conversion mechanism. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2024, 12, 114346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, Z.; Zhu, X.; Hou, H.; Tang, L.; Xiao, J.; Zhong, Q. Regeneration and utilization of graphite from the spent lithium-ion batteries by modified low-temperature sulfuric acid roasting. Waste Manag. 2022, 150, 30–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Hong, G.; Park, H.; Gomez-Flores, A.; Kim, H.; Lee, J.M.; Lee, J. Direct flotation separation of active materials from the black mass of lithium nickel cobalt manganese oxides-type spent lithium-ion batteries. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2024, 336, 126327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ginosar, D.M.; Petkovic, L.M.; Burch, K.C. Activity and stability of sulfuric acid decomposition catalysts for thermochemical water splitting cycles. In Proceedings of the AIChE Annual Meeting Conference, Cincinnati, OH, USA, 30 October–4 November 2005; pp. 7734–7740. Available online: https://folk.ntnu.no/skoge/prost/proceedings/aiche-2005/non-topical/Non%20topical/papers/258d.pdf (accessed on 1 May 2025).
  22. Cardarelli, F. Sulfuric Acid Digestion, Sulfuric Acid Baking, and Sulfation Roasting in Mineral and Chemical Processing, and Extractive Metallurgy; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2022; pp. 11–12. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. A summary of alternative recycling processes for spent lithium-ion batteries.
Figure 1. A summary of alternative recycling processes for spent lithium-ion batteries.
Minerals 15 00611 g001
Figure 2. Effect of roasting temperature on the leaching efficiencies of Li, Ni, Co, and Mn during the recycling process of sulfuric acid roasting (1.5 mL H2SO4/g sample, 1 h roasting time) followed by water leaching (50 °C; 200 rpm, 5% pulp density, 1 h leaching time).
Figure 2. Effect of roasting temperature on the leaching efficiencies of Li, Ni, Co, and Mn during the recycling process of sulfuric acid roasting (1.5 mL H2SO4/g sample, 1 h roasting time) followed by water leaching (50 °C; 200 rpm, 5% pulp density, 1 h leaching time).
Minerals 15 00611 g002
Figure 3. XRD pattern of product roasted at 500 °C.
Figure 3. XRD pattern of product roasted at 500 °C.
Minerals 15 00611 g003
Figure 4. Effect of mixing ratio on the leaching efficiencies of Li, Ni, Co, and Mn during the recycling process of sulfuric acid roasting (1–3 mL H2SO4/g sample, 1 h roasting time, 350 °C roasting temperature) followed by water leaching (50 °C, 200 rpm, 5% pulp density, 1 h leaching time).
Figure 4. Effect of mixing ratio on the leaching efficiencies of Li, Ni, Co, and Mn during the recycling process of sulfuric acid roasting (1–3 mL H2SO4/g sample, 1 h roasting time, 350 °C roasting temperature) followed by water leaching (50 °C, 200 rpm, 5% pulp density, 1 h leaching time).
Minerals 15 00611 g004
Figure 5. Effect of leaching temperature on the leaching efficiencies of Li, Ni, Co, and Mn during the recycling process of sulfuric acid roasting (3 mL H2SO4/g sample, 1 h roasting time, 500 °C) followed by water leaching (20–50 °C, 200 rpm, 5% pulp density, 1 h leaching time).
Figure 5. Effect of leaching temperature on the leaching efficiencies of Li, Ni, Co, and Mn during the recycling process of sulfuric acid roasting (3 mL H2SO4/g sample, 1 h roasting time, 500 °C) followed by water leaching (20–50 °C, 200 rpm, 5% pulp density, 1 h leaching time).
Minerals 15 00611 g005
Figure 6. Effect of roasting temperature on the leaching efficiencies of Li, Ni, Co, and Mn during the recycling process of sulfuric acid roasting (2.5 mL H2SO4/g sample, 1 h roasting time) followed by water leaching (50 °C; 200 rpm, 5% pulp density, 1 h leaching time).
Figure 6. Effect of roasting temperature on the leaching efficiencies of Li, Ni, Co, and Mn during the recycling process of sulfuric acid roasting (2.5 mL H2SO4/g sample, 1 h roasting time) followed by water leaching (50 °C; 200 rpm, 5% pulp density, 1 h leaching time).
Minerals 15 00611 g006
Figure 7. Effect of graphite on the leaching efficiencies of Li, Ni, Co, and Mn during the recycling process of sulfuric acid roasting (2.5 mL H2SO4/g sample, 1 h roasting time, 350 °C roasting temperature) followed by water leaching (50 °C; 200 rpm, 5% pulp density, 1 h leaching time).
Figure 7. Effect of graphite on the leaching efficiencies of Li, Ni, Co, and Mn during the recycling process of sulfuric acid roasting (2.5 mL H2SO4/g sample, 1 h roasting time, 350 °C roasting temperature) followed by water leaching (50 °C; 200 rpm, 5% pulp density, 1 h leaching time).
Minerals 15 00611 g007
Figure 8. Effect of graphite addition on sulfuric acid decomposition at 350 °C for 30 min with 25 mL H2SO4.
Figure 8. Effect of graphite addition on sulfuric acid decomposition at 350 °C for 30 min with 25 mL H2SO4.
Minerals 15 00611 g008
Figure 9. Effect of graphite addition on sulfuric acid decomposition at 300 °C for 20 min.
Figure 9. Effect of graphite addition on sulfuric acid decomposition at 300 °C for 20 min.
Minerals 15 00611 g009
Table 1. Metal content ratio of cathode scrap and black mass used in this study (%).
Table 1. Metal content ratio of cathode scrap and black mass used in this study (%).
LiNiCoMn
Cathode scrap10.3248.1919.7320.77
Black mass9.0950.0911.2011.12
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Choi, H.; Jo, I.; Park, J.; Yoo, K.; Alorro, R.D. The Effects of Graphite on the Leaching Behaviors of Active Materials of Lithium-Ion Batteries During Sulfuric Acid Roasting. Minerals 2025, 15, 611. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15060611

AMA Style

Choi H, Jo I, Park J, Yoo K, Alorro RD. The Effects of Graphite on the Leaching Behaviors of Active Materials of Lithium-Ion Batteries During Sulfuric Acid Roasting. Minerals. 2025; 15(6):611. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15060611

Chicago/Turabian Style

Choi, Heeyoung, Intae Jo, Jeeyoung Park, Kyoungkeun Yoo, and Richard Diaz Alorro. 2025. "The Effects of Graphite on the Leaching Behaviors of Active Materials of Lithium-Ion Batteries During Sulfuric Acid Roasting" Minerals 15, no. 6: 611. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15060611

APA Style

Choi, H., Jo, I., Park, J., Yoo, K., & Alorro, R. D. (2025). The Effects of Graphite on the Leaching Behaviors of Active Materials of Lithium-Ion Batteries During Sulfuric Acid Roasting. Minerals, 15(6), 611. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15060611

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop