Next Article in Journal
The Impact of Redox Atmosphere on the High-Temperature Melting Behavior of Basalt Materials
Previous Article in Journal
Magmatic Telescoping as a Reflection of the Shift in Geodynamic Circumstances and Patterns of Formation of Gold Ore Manifestations in the Example of the Uskalin Granitoid Massif (Russia)
Previous Article in Special Issue
RETRACTED: Tang et al. Exploration of the Subsurface Three-Dimensional Structure in Rare Earth Ore Areas Using Electrical Resistivity Tomography: A Case Study in Changting, Fujian, China. Minerals 2024, 14, 1164
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Advances in Magnetic and Electromagnetic Techniques for Mineral Exploration: Enhancing Resource Discovery

1
Geo Data Solutions GDS Inc., Laval, QC H7P 0G1, Canada
2
Institute of Geological Sciences, Polish Academy of Sciences, 31-002 Krakow, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2025, 15(6), 595; https://doi.org/10.3390/min15060595
Submission received: 9 May 2025 / Accepted: 21 May 2025 / Published: 2 June 2025

1. Introduction

The rapid technological progress of the 20th century significantly advanced magnetic and electromagnetic (EM) techniques, establishing them as key tools for the discovery of mineral resources. Magnetic surveys, which detect subtle variations in the Earth’s magnetic field, are particularly effective in mapping magnetite concentration [1,2]. Initially applied in the exploration of iron formations [3], magnetic techniques have evolved into powerful tools for regional geological mapping [4], and for delineating the geological context of non-magnetic mineral deposits such as gold [5].
Electromagnetic methods, by contrast, involve the use of natural or artificial electromagnetic sources and receivers that detect subsurface conductivity variations [6]. These techniques are capable of directly detecting conductive ore bodies such as massive sulfides [7], or indirectly indicating the presence of deposits like uranium through related conductivity anomalies [8].
Recent advances in these methods span several domains. In acquisition, the deployment of magnetic and EM systems on airborne platforms has been transformative [9,10]. Concurrently, improvements in sensor design, data acquisition systems, and processing techniques have enhanced sensitivity and resolution [11]. Computational developments have also led to increasingly sophisticated data interpretation workflows that integrate geophysical signatures with geological frameworks [12]. These techniques have been successfully applied in diverse geological settings worldwide, further validating their utility and expanding their scope.
This special issue presents a curated selection of studies that reflect current directions in magnetic and electromagnetic exploration. It particularly highlights case studies demonstrating innovative or unconventional applications of these methods in mineral discovery.

2. Overview of Published Articles

Contribution 1: Cai and Ma article introduce a novel inversion method termed self-structural constraint (SSC), which enhances aeromagnetic data interpretation. Applied to a gold exploration project in western Henan, China, the SSC method aids in delineating volcanic zones with potential magmatic-hydrothermal mineralization.
Contribution 2: Liu et al. describe a multi-method approach combining magnetics, self-potential surveys, trenching, and drilling that led to the discovery of graphite deposits in northeastern China. Initial magnetic anomalies guided follow-up surveys and confirmed mineralization.
Contribution 3: Dong et al. apply the Audio-Magnetotelluric (AMT) method to the Gouli gold field, in the East Kunlun metallogenic belt, China. Two-dimensional inversions of EM data helped characterize alteration zones associated with gold mineralization, correlating well with drilling results.
Contribution 4: Vallée and Moussaoui propose a new method for calculating response moments from time-domain electromagnetic (TDEM) data. This approach is system agnostic and was tested using two distinct airborne TDEM systems over the Reid-Mahaffy test site, in Ontario, Canada. The technique enables comparative evaluation of system performance in identifying subsurface conductors.
Contribution 5: Cheng et al. report on the use of magnetic data to guide exploration for non-magnetic fluorite in the Gobi Desert, China. A low magnetic anomaly associated with structurally favorable setting was identified as a proxy for the fluorite-hosting environment.
Contribution 6: Zhang et al. combine gravity and magnetic to investigate deep geological structures related to gold mineralization in Fujian, China. The integrated interpretation highlighted prospective zones by correlating physical property anomalies with known geology.
Contribution 7: Prikhodko et al. introduce MobileMT, an innovative airborne EM system that uses natural field measurements to enhance deep penetration of the subsurface. They demonstrate its applicability across varied mineralization contexts: uranium in Canada’s Athabasca Basin, massive sulfides in Ecuador, Ni-Cu deposits in Sudbury, Canada, and porphyry systems in British Columbia, Canada.
Contribution 8: Gong et al. employ a suite of geophysical techniques–magnetics, vertical electrical sounding, and controlled source audio-magnetotellurics– to explore agate deposits in Liangshan, China. These sedimentary host deposits lie above resistive basalt and are characterized by distinct resistivity contrasts.
Contribution 9: Vallée et al. present a global review of magnetic and EM applications over the last fifteen years. The authors classify studies by deposit type, location and technique, and summarize trends in tabular and graphical forms. Although biased toward North American case studies, this comprehensive synthesis serves as a practical guide for future exploration strategy development.

3. Conclusions

Magnetic and electromagnetic techniques continue to play an essential role in the evolving landscape of mineral exploration. As exploration targets diversify and move into more complex environments across all continents, technological advances–especially those integrating artificial intelligence–are expected to further revolutionize both data acquisition and interpretation. The ongoing development of these methods will be critical in meeting the global demand for mineral resources.

Conflicts of Interest

Marc A. Vallée is employee of Geo Data Solutions GDS Inc. The paper reflects the views of the scientists and not the company.

List of Contributions

  • Cai, J.; Ma, G. Self-Structural Constraint Joint Inversion of Aeromagnetic and Gradient Data: Enhanced Imaging for Gold Deposits in Western Henan, China. Minerals 2025, 15, 337.
  • Liu, J.; Yi, J.; Li, C.; Gao, C. Integrating Magnetic and Self-Potential Methods for Efficient Graphite Exploration: Insights from Ji’an, Northeast China. Minerals 2025, 15, 27.
  • Dong, J.; Wang, P.; Li, H.; Zhang, H.; Zhao, M.; Tong, H.; Yu, X.; Li, J.; Zhang, B. Study of the Genesis Process and Deep Prospecting Breakthrough in the Gouli Ore Concentration of the East Kunlun Metallogenic Belt Using Audio Magnetotelluric Data. Minerals 2024, 14, 930.
  • Vallée, M.A.; Moussaoui, M. Moment Estimation from Time Domain Electromagnetic Data. Minerals 2024, 14, 888.
  • Cheng, L.; Han, L.; Kai, Y.; Yongbao, G.; Weidong, T.; Chuan, Y. Location Prediction Study of Fluorite Ore in Shallow Cover Area: Evidence from Integrated Geophysical Surveys. Minerals 2024, 14, 838.
  • Zhang, Z.; Li, Y.; Chen, L.; Zhang, Q.; Sun, Y. Deep Geological Structure Analysis of the Dongyang Area, Fujian, China: Insights from Integrated Gravity and Magnetic Data. Minerals 2024, 14, 837.
  • Prikhodko, A.; Bagrianski, A.; Kuzmin, P. Airborne Natural Total Field Broadband Electromagnetics—Configurations, Capabilities, and Advantages. Minerals 2024, 14, 704.
  • Gong, S.; Zhao, K.; Wang, M.; Yan, S.; Li, Y.; Yang, J. Application of Integrated Geological and Geophysical Surveys on the Exploration of Chalcedony Deposits: A Case Study on Nanhong Agate in Liangshan, China. Minerals 2024, 14, 677.
  • Vallée, M.A.; Moussaoui, M.; Khan, K. Case Studies of Magnetic and Electromagnetic Techniques Covering the Last Fifteen Years. Minerals 2024, 14, 1286.

References

  1. Nabighian, M.N.; Grauch, V.J.S.; Hansen, R.O.; LaFehr, T.R.; Li, Y.; Peirce, J.W.; Phillips, J.D.; Ruder, M.E. The historical development of the magnetic method in exploration. Geophysics 2005, 70, 33ND–61ND. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Grant, F.S. Aeromagnetics, geology and ore environments, I. Magnetite in igneous, sedimentary and metamorphic rocks: An overview. Geoexploration 1985, 23, 303–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jahren, C.E. Magnetic susceptibility of bedded iron-formation. Geophysics 1963, 28, 756–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hinze, W.J. (Ed.) The Utility of Regional Gravity and Magnetic Anomaly Maps; Society of Exploration Geophysicists: Tulsa, OK, USA, 1985. [Google Scholar]
  5. Doyle, H.A. Geophysical exploration for gold—A review. Explor. Geophys. 1986, 17, 169–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Grant, F.S.; West, G.F. Interpretation Theory in Applied Geophysics; McGraw-Hill Book Company: New York, NY, USA, 1965. [Google Scholar]
  7. Morgan, L.A. Geophysical Characteristics of Volcanogenic Massive Sulfide Deposits. In Volcanogenic Sulfide Occurrence Model; Shanks, P., Thurston, R., Eds.; US Geological Survey: Reston, VA, USA, 2012; pp. 113–131. [Google Scholar]
  8. Tuncer, V.; Unsworth, M.J.; Siripunvaraporn, W.; Craven, J.A. Exploration for unconformity-type uranium deposits with audiomagnetotelluric data: A case study from the McArthur River mine, Saskatchewan, Canada. Geophysics 2006, 71, B201–B209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hood, P. History of aeromagnetic surveying in Canada. Lead. Edge 2007, 26, 1384–1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fountain, D. Airborne electromagnetic systems—50 years of development. Explor. Geophys. 1998, 29, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Macnae, J. Advances in Electromagnetic Data Processing: Noise, Signal, SPM and AIP. In Proceedings of the Exploration 17: Sixth Decennial International Conference on Mineral Exploration, Toronto, ON, Canada, 22–25 October 2017; Tschirhart, V., Thomas, M.D., Eds.; Decennial Mineral Exploration Conferences: Toronto, ON, Canada, 2017; pp. 191–208. [Google Scholar]
  12. Farquharson, C.G.; Lelièvre, P.G. Modelling and Inversion for Mineral Exploration Geophysics: A Review of Recent Progress, the Current State-of-the-Art, and Future Directions. In Proceedings of the Exploration 17: Sixth Decennial International Conference on Mineral Exploration, Toronto, ON, Canada, 22–25 October 2017; Tschirhart, V., Thomas, M.D., Eds.; Decennial Mineral Exploration Conferences: Toronto, ON, Canada, 2017; pp. 51–74. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vallée, M.A.; Mazur, S. Advances in Magnetic and Electromagnetic Techniques for Mineral Exploration: Enhancing Resource Discovery. Minerals 2025, 15, 595. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15060595

AMA Style

Vallée MA, Mazur S. Advances in Magnetic and Electromagnetic Techniques for Mineral Exploration: Enhancing Resource Discovery. Minerals. 2025; 15(6):595. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15060595

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vallée, Marc A., and Stanislaw Mazur. 2025. "Advances in Magnetic and Electromagnetic Techniques for Mineral Exploration: Enhancing Resource Discovery" Minerals 15, no. 6: 595. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15060595

APA Style

Vallée, M. A., & Mazur, S. (2025). Advances in Magnetic and Electromagnetic Techniques for Mineral Exploration: Enhancing Resource Discovery. Minerals, 15(6), 595. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15060595

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop