Next Article in Journal
Accessibility Assessment of the Iron Deposits on the Qinghai–Xizang Plateau: Integrating Transport Networks, Economic Dynamics, and Ecological Constraints
Previous Article in Journal
One-Part Alkali-Activated Wood Biomass Binders for Cemented Paste Backfill
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

U-Pb and Lu-Hf Record of Two Metamorphic Events from the Peixe Alkaline Suite, Brasilia Belt: Textural and Isotopic Complexity in Zircon

by
Marco Helenio Coelho
1,
Luís Felipe Romero
2,
Maria Virginia Alves Martins
2,3,
Werlem Holanda
2,
Marcelo Salomão
2,
Guilherme Loriato Potratz
2,
Armando Dias Tavares
1 and
Mauro Cesar Geraldes
2,*
1
Institute of Physics Armando Dias Tavares, Rio de Janeiro State University, Av. São Francisco Xavier, 524 CEP, Maracanã, Rio de Janeiro 20550-013, Brazil
2
Lab-4037F, Faculty of Geology, Rio de Janeiro State University, Av. São Francisco Xavier, 524 CEP, Maracanã, Rio de Janeiro 20550-013, Brazil
3
GeoBioTEc Researh Unity, Aveiro University, Campus de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2025, 15(3), 274; https://doi.org/10.3390/min15030274
Submission received: 23 January 2025 / Revised: 21 February 2025 / Accepted: 25 February 2025 / Published: 7 March 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Mineral Geochemistry and Geochronology)

Abstract

:
U-Pb and Lu-Hf isotopes, by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry and laser ablation (ICP-MS-LA), are reported in zircon grains from the Peixe Alkaline Suite. This unit comprises alkaline rocks such as syenites with nepheline, albite-oligoclase-biotite, and pegmatitic bodies. The zircon grain was imaged by cathodoluminescence (CL), which allowed the characterization of features within the crystal. These features comprise complex zone crosscuts, showing the existence of pulses that caused the intrusion of isotopically younger phases into the interior of the grain on a millimetric scale. The U-Pb results suggest a metamorphic event with Pb loss at 579 ± 3 Ma. They can be interpreted because of the collisional regional event of the Brasilia Orogen (Mara Rosa Orogeny). A second age grouping at 548 ± 2.5 Ma (MSWD = 8), obtained in areas with high luminescence fading laterally to oscillatory zoned domains with variations in the abundance of isotopes, is 33 Ma younger, demonstrating a rejuvenation of these areas through Pb loss. It is interpreted here as a second metamorphic event related to a collisional event (Santa Terezinha de Goiás arc). The Lu-Hf results for these areas indicate ƐHf values between −10 and −17, suggesting the existence of magmatic isotopic rework in a crustal environment.

1. Introduction

Zircon is the most used mineral in U-Pb geochronology, mainly due to its wide distribution and diversity of rock types. In addition, zircon easily accepts the entry of U into its crystal lattice in substitution for Zr and, in contrast, zircon does not accept the entry of common Pb, which allows us to interpret that practically all the Pb present in zircon is radiogenic, resulting from the decay of U and Th [1,2,3]. The selection of zircon crystals without fractures, inclusions, or colorlessness has proven to be of great importance for the success of its application in the U-Pb method. This careful selection of clear grains allows for more consistent and accurate ages. Techniques such as the abrasion technique suggested by [4] have been shown to reduce the discordance of analytical results, probably due to the elimination of the grain edge characterized by the most significant loss of Pb.
Technological advances in mass spectrometry and new laboratory techniques [5,6,7,8] have allowed us to use other mineral phases, such as monazite, perovskite, titanite, baddeleyite, and rutile. Another important reason for using these minerals (in addition to zircon) is their valuable information regarding the age of magmatism, metamorphism, and mineralization. These possibilities arise because each mineral has the cooling temperature of the U-Th-Pb system.
U-Pb analysis by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry and laser abrasion (ICP-MS-LA) was first used in 1985 [9] and has been an essential analytical tool for geosciences ever since [5,10]. This technique has been developed chiefly by researchers in the earth sciences, mainly due to its application to geological samples, and many of the essential renovations in the method have been developed in universities by geology departments [11], for example the optimization of the wavelength of laser radiation, the optics of the laser beam, and the improvement in the camera of the sample holder to study minerals and rocks. Historically, this development had to wait for the construction of equipment such as multicollectors and magnetic separators, among others. With the current availability of such equipment, geologists are using ICP-MS-LA to take measurements of isotopic composition not only in individual crystals but also in parts of these minerals on the scale of a few tens of microns [12,13,14,15,16].
The objective of this work is to investigate the episodic loss of Pb from zircon during the metamorphic process. It is based on numerous examples of minerals that lose Pb in thermo-tectonic events, as [17,18] demonstrated. In these events, the heating of the mineral, which the passage of hydrothermal fluids may accompany, allows the displacement of Pb through the crystal lattice of the host mineral [19,20,21,22]. In these examples, the lower intercept detects episodic loss in the concord diagram, interpreted as the age of regional metamorphism. In this sense, the upper intercept [23] can be interpreted as the rock’s crystallization age, and a later event would be responsible for the heating and loss of Pb in a metamorphic episode.

2. Geological Setting

The Peixe Alkaline Suite is in the northern part of the Brasilia Fold Belt, comprising metasedimentary and metavolcanic rocks deposited in the Mesoproterozoic with subsequent magmatism and deformation occurring in the Neoproterozoic [24,25]. The Peixe Alkaline Suite comprises rocks whose composition and features may be interpreted as formed before the main crustal shortening phase of the Basilica Fold Belt. Late-stage deformations under simple shear conditions affected the body, enveloping it within a regional dextral sigmoidal structure [26]. The intrusive complex is an elongated plutonic body in contact with metasedimentary rocks, forming halos of contact metamorphism with zoned hydrothermal alteration. Pegmatites and nepheline veins extend irregularly from the central body into the surrounding host rocks.
Regionally, the study area comprises Archean rocks from the Goiás Block [27], represented by two greenstone belts (Guarinos and Pilar de Goiás) covered by a Mesoproterozoic metasedimentary sequence (Figure 1). Different schists and paragneisses [25] constitute this metasedimentary basement of amphibolite facies, called the Ticunzal Formation. The rocks from the Ticunzal Formation outcrop to the SE of the study area, with Paleoproterozoic sources and deposition age defined by U-Pb ages between 1.47 and 1.57 Ga. Deformation and metamorphism occurred during the Brasiliano orogeny in the Neoproterozoic [24,25,26,27].
In this sense, the evolution of these basins and their sedimentation ages based on U-Pb geochronological data in detrital zircon obtained by the laser ablation method (MC-ICP-MS-LA) show an age of 1405 ± 10 Ma, marking the maximum limit of deposition and indicating a source area with Mesoproterozoic rocks. The samples show a higher frequency of Paleoproterozoic crystals between 1796 and 2472 Ma and older populations of Mesoneoarchean age between 2672 and 3112 Ma. In this sense, the Paleoproterozoic to Archean detrital zircon grains may come from the rocks that constitute the Block Archean of Goiás.
In the Neoproterozoic era, the Brasilia orogen developed, mainly represented by the calc-alkaline plutonic rocks of the magmatic arc that extend for more than 250 km and constitute the extension of the Goiás Magmatic Arc [26]. In addition, there are rocks from the Araguaia Orogen, whose rocks are pushed against the rocks of the Mara Rosa arc and older continental parts due to the collision of the Amazonian Craton. The platform sediments are deformed and pushed against its cratonic area, with ophiolitic rocks tectonically embedded in the Araguaia Belt. This metamorphic event probably results from the collisional processes between the Amazonian craton and the São Francisco-Congo cratonic block (Figure 1). It comprises the late collision of the western Gondwana collage.
In the Brasilia Belt, in the states of Goiás and Tocantins, many pegmatites of syenitic composition are explored for gems. The Alkaline Peixe Suite hosts unusual mineral occurrences, including centimeter-sized zircon mega crystals that have been the subject of economic exploration. An important characterization was reported by [30,31]. Alkaline rocks defined the main units as being composed of nepheline syenites, albite-oligoclase-biotite sienite, and pegmatitic bodies mineralized with zircon, corundum, and rutile, and grouped these rocks under the denomination “Alkaline Monzonitic intrusives”, including pegmatoid granites. Detailed studies and the first geological mapping of this unit were carried out by tourmaline, the term Peixe Alkaline Complex was adopted and petrochemical and geochronological studies were deepened with U-Pb zircon dating of a late pegmatite at ca. 550 Ma [32,33,34,35,36,37,38].

2.1. Synthesis of the Rio do Peixe Alkaline Suite Geochronology from the Literature

The authors of [38] reported LA-ICP-MS U-Pb ages in zircon from the Peixe Alkaline Suite. These authors present the results of two fragments of Peixe zircon. The 441 analyses result in concordant 206Pb/238U and 207Pb/235U mean ages of 571 ± 10 Ma (2%) and 568 ± 10 Ma (2%), respectively. The authors of [35] present the results of four fragments of zircon grains studied with the same protocol as [38] to complement previous experiments. The results (20 determinations per zircon grain) agree well with the initial data.
According to [31], geochronological analyses by U-Pb ICP-MS-LA on monazite from Peixe Alkaline Suite (locally named Boanerges pegmatite) generated an age of 519 ± 2.8 Ma. Chemical U-Th-Pb dating on uraninites from the São Júlio pegmatite revealed ages between 500 and 560 Ma, which are close to or overlap the age of ca. 560 Ma attributed to the leucogranites of the Mata Azul Suite in the literature [38]. However, the authors above suggest that there is a temporal distinction between the alkaline and acidic magmatic events found in the region.
The Pb/Pb ages in zircon, presented by [31], provided an age of 1470 ± 8 Ma and are similar to the U-Pb ages in syenite nepheline zircon. In addition, ref. [31] reported ages of 1503 ± 5 Ma in zircon grains from sienitic rocks, probably related to the Monte Santo Suite. However, ref. [30] found younger ages in zircon included in acid pegmatite, yielding 557 ± 15 Ma and 559 ± 7 Ma. These ages are interpreted as crystallization events.
Sm-Nd isotopic data in syenites show very heterogeneous TDM ages, ranging from Archean–Paleoproterozoic ages (1664–2979 Ma) with ƐNd(t = 1.5 Ga) from −7.22 to 8.34, and Mesoproterozoic TDM ages in a very short range (1395–1329 Ma), with ƐNd (t = 1.5 Ga) from −8.34 to 6.3 Ga [38]. The acid rocks, granites, and pegmatites reported by [29] to be associated with the alkaline system indicate Paleoproterozoic TDM between 2132 and 1919 Ma, all from crustal sources with ƐNd (t = 1.5 Ga) from −17.4 to −2.71.
In addition, U-Th-Pb ages on uraninite revealed a maximum age between 500 and 560 Ma, similar to the age of 560 Ma attributed to leucogranites of the Mata Azul Suite in the literature [38]. These ages, field relationships, mineralogy, and geochemical data suggest that the Mata Azul Suite is the likely source of the pegmatites that occur in the region and are termed the Mata Azul Suite Pegmatite Field. While incomplete U-Pb isotopic data are available in the literature, no published Lu-Hf data exist for the Peixe Alkaline Suite.
To summarize, the literature data do not allow a clear conclusion and a response to the question about the age of the Peixe Alkaline Suite. Is it Calymmian, around 1500 Ma, as reported by [31,38]? Alternatively, is it Ediacaran, around 570 Ma, as indicated at the beginning of the section? Or are the syenites Mesoproterozoic and the pegmatites Neoproterozoic? If the latter is the case, why are the syenites and the pegmatites considered part of the same suite? In this paper, detailed U-Pb ages are presented, aiming to help understandings of the complex Peixe Alkaline Suite geologic evolution.

2.2. Local Context

The Peixe Alkaline Suite (Figure 2) comprises medium-grained foliated and banded leucocratic rocks represented by syenogranites (Figure 3A), nepheline syenites (Figure 3B), and alkaline pegmatites. These rocks exhibit recrystallized textures, with points in triple junctions, along with metamorphic albite and magnetite, indicatingthat they were subjected to low-grade metamorphism conditions [39]. Leucogranites (see map in Figure 4) were formed during the Neoproterozoic, associated with the evolution of the Mara Rosa Magmatic Arc located only in the north of Goiás. The essential minerals of these pegmatites are K-feldspar, quartz and mica, beryl, chlorite, garnet, albite, zwieselite, apatite, rockbridgeite, hagendorphyte, heterosite, phosphosiderite and strengite. Tourmaline-bearing pegmatites are also present, composed of tourmaline, albite, beryl, trilithionite, dravite, schorlite, elbaite, rossmanite, liddicoatite and dravite [37,38].
The Peixe Alkaline Suite comprises elongated intrusions, controlled by a foliation concordant with the host rocks. The main outcropping rocks are nepheline syenite, alkali feldspar syenite, nepheline monzosyenite and nepheline monzodiorite with restricted areas of occurrence. Gneissic textures with banding observed are commonly observed at the outcrop scale. An important petrographic work describing the metamorphic textures in alkaline rocks is reported by [39,40]. In this work, the authors describe rocks of syenite composition that present nepheline as an abundant mineral and present typical miaskitic mineralogy, comprising albite, microcline, nepheline, amphibole, biotite, and magnetite and accessory clinopyroxene, calcite, sodalite, cancrinite, corundum, apatite, allanite, zircon and pyrochlore. Nepheline syenite presents fine to medium grains and hololeucocratic to leucocratic color. The predominant texture of the felsic minerals is granoblastic, where the crystals often form 120° triple junctions with medium grains and local domains, with a well-preserved igneous granular texture, although some rocks contain large crystals of albite, microcline, nepheline or perthite, commonly exhibiting recrystallization, characterized by feldspar crystal rims. Mafic minerals generally occur as oriented clusters with a cumulus texture, where amphibole and less commonly biotite occur as intercumulus minerals.
Rocks of monzosyenitic composition are medium- to coarse-grained and hololeucocratic, consisting almost entirely of feldspars and nepheline. The most common texture within these rocks is a zoned microstructure represented by cores of perthite, individual feldspars, or nepheline overlain by fine-grained granoblastic crystals of the same minerals. The alkali feldspar syenites are fine-grained, leucocratic, and foliated, and their contacts with nepheline syenite are through alkali feldspar–nepheline syenite transition zones. The dominant texture of the felsic minerals is granoblastic, while the mafic minerals are oriented biotite flakes and interstitial amphiboles. Large crystals of feldspar and perthite represent relict igneous textures, while small crystals of feldspar are granoblastic. Nepheline-free rocks contain only biotite and magnetite as mafic minerals, while nepheline-bearing rocks additionally contain amphibole and pyroxene. Monzodioritic rocks also contain nepheline and occur with foliation parallel to host rocks. These rocks are fine-grained and mesocratic, consisting of oligoclase, microcline, nepheline, clinopyroxene, amphibole, biotite, and accessory titanite and apatite, while fluorite and calcite occur as alteration minerals. Deformational textures are common in this rock, while the most commonly observed textures are large amphibole phenocrysts, with elongated grains in the direction of regional foliation.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Sample Preparation

Zircon grains were obtained from mines in the pegmatitic mineral gem production area hosted in metasyenitic rocks. Two kilograms of zircon grains was selected for this study (Figure 5). A large grain (2 cm × 3 cm × 1.5 cm) was fixed with adhesive tape in a circular mold with an internal diameter of 4 cm. The mold was filled with epoxy resin. The mounting face containing the zircon grain was polished after hardening. Aluminum oxide sandpaper with granulometry ranging from 127 to 15.3 µm was used in a sequence of abrasives of progressively smaller granulometry until half of the grain was exposed, allowing for the visualization of the grain’s interior. After this procedure, diamond pastes with granulometry ranging from 3 to 0.25 µm were used until the resin and the grain were polished enough to be visualized with a scanning electron microscope (SEM).

3.2. Scanning Electron Microscopy

The centimetric zircon grain was imaged to evaluate its internal structure (Figure 5) using a cathodoluminescence CITL Mk5-2 coupled to the Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) FEI Quanta 250 at the MultiLab facilities at Rio de Janeiro State University, with a voltage of 20 kV.

3.3. U-Pb Geochronological Analyses by ICP-MS-LA

U-Pb analyses were performed at the Multiuser Laboratory of Environment and Materials, MultiLab/Rio de Janeiro State University, using a Thermo Finningan NEPTUNE PLUS MC-ICP-MS-LA coupled to a Laser Ablation Photon Machine ANALYTE G2 system with a 193 nm laser. Ablations were carried out using a 40 µm diameter spot. GJ-1 (Appendix A), 91500 (Appendix B), and zircon standards were used as reference materials. The following analytical sequence was followed: blank, GJ-1, 10 ablations of the unknown grain, reference materials GJ-1 (presented in Appendix A, Figure 6A), 91500 (presented in Appendix B, Figure 6B), and blank again. Concordia diagrams for age determination by the U-Pb method were produced with the Isoplot software version 4.15 [23]. The laser’s wavelength of 193 nm produces a fine distribution of particles, which increases the efficiency of transporting the material, resulting in better sensitivity and minimal deposition in the plasma. A laser fluence of approximately 6 J/cm2, a repetition rate of 5–7 Hz, and a spot size of 20–40 µm were used for all analyses. Data on the GJ-1 zircon standard for a 30 μm ablation spot usually yielded 432.000–114.000 cps of 206Pb, 25.000–7.000 cps of 207Pb, 6.500–4.200 cps of 208Pb, 4.400–4.200 cps of 202Hg and 1.060–1.090 cps of 204 (Hg + Pb). For 232Th and 238U measurements on Faraday cups, the values are 0.78 mV and 6.06 mV, respectively, yielding an age of 610.8 ± 2.6 Ma. The GJ-01 reference material comprises many zircon crystals, approximately 1 cm in size, from African pegmatites with a crystallization age of 608.5 ± 0.4 Ma [41]. Using an Excel spreadsheet, offline corrections for blank, Hg interference and standard lead were performed. In addition, the obtained GJ-1 reference material values were compared with the literature values [41]. Hence, the U-Pb results obtained by ICP-MS-LA were treated in an offline spreadsheet for blank and GJ-1 correction.
A second reference material, the 91.500, represents a single zircon crystal from a syenite pegmatite from the Renfrew County mine, Canada, which crystallized at 1065 ± 6 Ma [42].

3.4. Lu-Hf Isotope Results

After the U/Pb isotopic analyses by the MC-ICP-MS-LA, zircon Hf isotope analysis was also carried out in situ at MultiLab (Rio de Janeiro State University, UERJ). Ref. [43] comprehensively described instrument conditions and data acquisition. CL images guided the isotopic analysis and were performed on zircon grains that show domains with distinct characteristics. The larger diameter of the laser-sampling crater during Lu-Hf analyses may occasionally result in sampling different zircon growth domains or their mixture. This potential mix in the sample can cause scattering in the results, but this was avoided by choosing areas large enough to contain the respective craters (30 µm for U/Pb and 40 µm for Lu/Hf). Typical ablation times for cycles of each measurement were 50 s with a 7 Hz repetition rate and a laser power of 7 MJ/pulse, resulting in a beam depth of 30–40 µm. The carrier gases transported the ablated sample from the laser-ablation cell via a mixing chamber to the ICP-MS torch. The isobaric interference of 176Lu on 176Hf was corrected by measuring the intensity of the interference-free 175Lu isotope and using a recommended 176Lu/175Lu ratio of 0.02655. Similarly, the isobaric interference of 176Yb on 176Hf was corrected by measuring the interference-free 172Yb isotope and using a recommended 176Yb/172Yb ratio of 0.5886 [42] to calculate 176Hf/177Hf values. Zircon 91500 was used as the reference material during our routine analyses, with a recommended 176Hf/177Hf ratio of 0.282293 ± 28 from laser analyses. Initial 176Hf/177Hf ratios were calculated concerning the chondritic reservoir at the time of zircon growth from magmas and using the U–Pb ages. εHf(t) values were determined to denote deviations in parts per 10,000 from a chondritic uniform reservoir (CHUR) reference in the initial 176Hf/177Hf ratio between the sample and the CHUR reservoir at the time of zircon growth. We have adopted a decay constant for 176Lu of 1.867 × 10−11 yr−1, and the chondritic ratios of 176Hf/177Hf (=0.282772) and 176Lu/177Hf (=0.0332), as reported by [42]. Depleted-mantle model ages (TDM) were calculated using the measured 176Lu/177Hf ratios, referred to as the depleted-mantle model with a present-day 176Hf/177Hf = 0.28325, similar to that of mid-ocean ridge basalts (MORBs) and 176Lu/177Hf = 0.0384 [42].

4. Results

4.1. CL Image of Zircon Grains

The CL images allowed the characterization of features within the zircon grain, such as fracture inclusions and growth phases. This information was used to select the area for ablation during the MC-ICP-MS-LA analysis. Advancements in analytical techniques using laser ablation have allowed a detailed investigation of isotopic variations within minerals. Consequently, knowledge of a mineral’s internal composition has become crucial for robust interpretations of isotopic results in geochemical studies.
The studied Peixe Alkaline Complex zircon exhibits complex intersecting zones, indicating the incorporation of multiple pulses of younger material into its interior. In Figure 7A, microlenses may represent new cycles of intrusion within the grain, corresponding to geological events experienced by the studied rocks. Additionally, in Figure 7B, sub-horizontal lenses display a cutting relationship, suggesting that the lighter gray material intruded into the darker gray areas.
Figure 7C presents a series of sub-parallel layers with variations in shades of light gray and dark gray material, exhibiting curvilinear shapes and varying thicknesses. Fig-ure 7D shows a relict portion of dark gray zircon surrounded by a lighter gray zircon portion in the upper part and light-toned areas that show growth over the relict portion in the lower part.
Figure 8A shows lighter gray zircon lenses with curvilinear surfaces that cut through the darker areas. Figure 8B shows a lighter gray zircon that intersects darker gray portions at an angle; both zones display a potentially magmatic zoning pattern in Figure 8C (not confirmed by U-Pb ages obtained) and also show layers of dark gray zircon, probably of magmatic origin, cut by layers of lighter tones at an angle, suggesting a younger age for the lighter portion. Figure 8D shows a complex pattern characterized by amoeboid shapes of light gray zircon cutting through darker gray zircon. These sections are irregular with curvilinear contours, suggesting phases of fluid percolation within the initially darker gray zircon.

4.2. U-Pb and Lu-Hf Results in Mega Crystal Zircon of the Peixe Alkaline Suite

The U-Pb analysis was carried out in sectors of the zircon grain (Figure 3) highlighted in a blue rectangle with three targets. The prismatic habit zircon grain is 2 cm long and 1 cm wide with bipyramidal endings locally rounded. Fractures and inclusions are commonly seen. Eighteen spots (Table 1) were analyzed on the gray area exhibiting metamorphic zones, resulting in a Concordia age of 579 ± 3.1 Ma (MSWD = 2.2) interpreted as the metamorphic age of the zircon (Figure 9A). For this age group, twenty-one Lu-Hf analyses (Table 2) were carried out, yielding initial 176Hf/177Hf ratios from 0.28134 to 0.28275, ƐHf(t) values between −8.6 and −13.6 (Figure 10A) and TDM model ages between 1.18 and 0.54 Ga. The complex feature observed in CL images shows that the zircon grain exhibits oscillatory zoning (Figure 11).
A second group of analyses was obtained in other zones (white, gray area; Figure 11) interpreted as younger domains of the zircon grains (light gray bands) (Table 1). Eleven analytical points give a range of concordant ages that spread out across the Concordia diagram (Figure 9B), giving a concordant age of 548 ± 2.5 Ma (MSWD = 8), with the 206Pb/238U average age of 521 ± 14 Ma (MSWD = 0.49). This age is interpreted as the best approximation of the metamorphic age of this area of the analyzed grain due to textural domains displaying different characteristics from the previous group (Table 2). Ten Lu-Hf analyses were performed in these domains, yielding initial 176Hf/177Hf ratios from 0.28134 to 0.28275, ƐHf(t) values between −12.6 and −39.6 (Figure 10B), and TDM model ages between 1.28 and 0.64 Ga.

5. Discussions

5.1. The Tectonic Environment of Generation of the Peixe Alkaline Suite

The intrusions related to the Peixe Alkaline Suite accompany the regional structures of the Brasilia Belt, intruding on the Mesoproterozoic metasedimentary sequences and suggesting an intrusion period related to the extensional process or rifting in the continental crust before the beginning of the seafloor expansion of the oceanic crust. These alkaline bodies showed Mesoproterozoic ages by the TIMS method on zircon, but the rocks metamorphosed in the Gondwana collision, as recorded by Neoproterozoic ages. In this way, the anorogenic magmatism of ca. 1.5 Ga studied here may relate to the Peixe syenite dated 1478 ± 8 Ma [29], interpreted by the authors as extensional rifting tectonic [25,26,27].
Magmatism accompanied the initial phase of continental rifting, leading to the rupture of the continental crust related to the extensional phase between 1.5 and 1.4 Ga, which marks the cratonization of Archean and Paleopoterozoic terrains observed regionally. Ref. [37] associated the massive intrusions with an aborted attempt at continental rifting. This anorogenic magmatism, associated with an alkali-rich extensional process in the state of Goiás, revealed two distinct episodes at approximately 1600 and 1770 Ma [44,45,46]. However, the ages reported in the literature may provide solid evidence of younger anorogenic magmatism. These dolerite dykes are known to be temporally and spatially associated with large ra-pakivi anorogenic granite plutons in other parts of the world, such as Finland [47], and are rich in Sn. These dolerite dykes are known to be temporally and spatially associated with large rapakivi anorogenic granite plutons in other parts of the world, such as Finland [45], and are rich in Sn. In this way, the anorogenic magmatism of ca. 1.5 Ga studied here may be related to the worldwide age-dependent process probably related to supercontinent amalgamation, where Amazonian craton took part and the extensional setting responsible for the Peixe syenite origin dated to 1478 ± 8 Ma [29].

5.2. The Record of Two Metamorphic Events (Pb Episodic Losses)

Refs. [44,45] defined the crystallization age of the Alkaline Suite of Peixe at 1503 ± 3 Ma, consistent with preliminary U-Pb ages, obtained by the authors of [46], of 1470 ± 8 Ma. These Mesoproterozoic ages are consistent with the proposed geologic evolution [46]. Our results indicate that the zircon mega crystal obtained from the nepheline syenite rock of the Peixe Alkaline Complex underwent a metamorphic event at 579.7 ± 6.1 Ma, which can be interpreted because of the regional event related to the Brasilia Orogen. Our data are in good agreement with the results of [35], who reported the existence of a metamorphic–metasomatic event affecting the Peixe Alkaline Suite at around 577 Ma, and [38], who reported a mean 206Pb/238U age of 571 ± 10 Ma for a set of 441 concordant analyses.
A second event at 546.7 ± 5.3 Ma was identified in areas of the analyzed zircon grain characterized by distinct texture, as revealed by CL imaging and differences in elemental composition. This suggests a new event of isotopic homogenization within the studied zircon.
Two overlapping Neoproterozoic collisions represent the main magmatic phases of the Brasilia Orogen: the first is an island arc correlated with the accretion of the Mara Rosa arc, with U-Pb ages between 848 ± 4 Ma and 810 ± 4 Ma [37].
The ƐHf values between −17.8 and −13.9 obtained here for the 579.7 ± 6.1 Ma age domains indicate the existence of isotopic rehomogenization in a crustal environment, likely resulting from Neoproterozoic metamorphism associated with a collisional event during the formation of the supercontinent Gondwana.
Other authors [45,48,49] also suggested that the interpretation for the second group of younger ages obtained here could be explained by the existence of a second tectonic event called the Santa Terezinha de Goiás arc, formed by calc-alkaline magmatism. This magmatic event is recorded by U-Pb zircon ages ranging from 594 ± 2 Ma to 540 ± 5 Ma. The Lu-Hf results for these areas indicate ƐHf values between −10 and −17, suggesting the existence of isotopic rehomogenization in a crustal environment. These ƐHf values are partially similar to Sm-Nd isotope results, which indicate TDM ages between 2860 and 900 Ma and ƐNd (t = 580) from −22.42 to +2.84. The results reported here and data from the literature suggest that an essential episodic Pb loss event may be related to the crustal reworking resulting from collisions of cratonic fragments joined in the amalgamation of Gondwana.

6. Conclusions

The Alkaline Peixe Suite occurs in the central region of Brazil, in the Tocantins State, where many areas of exploration of pegmatites of syenitic composition can be observed. These rocks comprise the basement of the Brasilia Fold Belt, which intruded into metasedimentary and metavolcanic units deposited in the Mesoproterozoic [24,32,38,39]. The Pb/Pb ages in zircon presented by [33] provided an age of 1470 ± 8 Ma and are similar to the U-Pb ages in nepheline syenite zircon, obtained by [30], of 1503 ± 5 Ma.
The U-Pb Ages in zircon reported in the Peixe Alkaline Complex literature [29,30,32] present metamorphism results between 571 ± 10 Ma and 568 ± 10 Ma. The ages reported here in zircon grains show the concordant age of 579 ± 3.1 Ma (MSWD = 0.14) in part of the craters produced. This first event, indicated at 579 ± 3 Ma, can be interpreted as a result of the regional event related to the Brasilia Orogen. In contrast, a second age grouping was obtained, and other zones of the zircon grains were analyzed, giving a concordant age of 548 ± 2.5 Ma (MSWD = 8). This Pb loss event was observed in the samples studied in this investigation, aged 33 Ma younger, and may represent a second regional metamorphism event.
The internal composition mapping of minerals has become crucial for robust interpretations of isotopic results in geochemical studies. The studied Peixe Alkaline Complex zircon exhibits complex intersecting zones, as CL images allowed the characterization of features within the zircon grain. The textures include fracture inclusions and growth, indicating the incorporation of multiple pulses of younger material into its interior.
Finally, Lu-Hf analyses were carried out in the areas of the grain previously analyzed by U-Pb with ƐHf values between −10 and −17, indicating a crustal source for the protoliths of the studied sample. These ƐHf values (T = 579 Ma) may result from a collisional event and the consequent metamorphism of the Peixe Alkaline Suite. Thus, the Peixe Alkaline Suite records two Pb loss events; the first is 33 My younger than the second one. These results are corroborated by the different isotope abundances measured by mass spectrometry and demonstrate a rehomoneization of these areas through Pb loss, interpreted here as a second metamorphic event during the Neoproterozoic, resulting from a collisional event in the formation of the supercontinent Gondwana.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.H.C. and M.C.G.; methodology, L.F.R.; software, G.L.P.; validation, A.D.T., M.V.A.M. and L.F.R. formal analysis, M.H.C.; investigation, M.S.; resources, M.C.G.; Data curation, A.D.T.; writing—original draft preparation, M.H.C.; writing—review and editing, M.C.G.; visualization, W.H.; supervision, A.D.T.; project administration, M.V.A.M.; funding acquisition, M.C.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro for his postdoctoral scholarship, under process numbers E26-204.530/2021 and E26-204.531/2021, the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico of Brazil (CnPQ) and Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, (FAPERJ) for the research grants (processes # 301470/2016-2 and E-26/202.843/2017, respectively), the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico of Brazil, CnPQ (process #302676/2019-8) and FAPERJ (process #202.927/2019 and process #E—26/200.333/2023) for the research grants.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the funding agencies: GLP thanks Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro for his postdoctoral scholarship; MCG would like to thank the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico of Brazil (CnPQ) and Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, (FAPERJ) for the research grants; MVAM would like to thank the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico of Brazil, CnPQ and FAPERJ for the research grants.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Appendix A. U-Pb Results of GJ-01 Reference Material

Spot NumberPbThU 207Pb/1 s206Pb/1 s 207Pb/1 s206Pb/1 s207Pb/1 s207Pb/1 s%
ƒ 206appmppmppmTh/Ub235U[%]238U[%]Rhod206Pbe[%]238Uabs235Uabs206PbabsConcf
GJ-01 010.00547730.062836.08167301.95340.0201410.8240084.0524330.0993361.8349980.4528140.0601623.61317610.516411.20296610.28224.73127609.41222.01909100.1812
GJ-01 020.00414531.32516.141736316.28590.0194180.8237973.3716220.0991661.7853880.5295340.060252.86011609.51910.88228610.164420.57244612.560917.5199199.50341
GJ-01 030.00542631.87496.458264322.91670.020.8163883.3933710.0986471.7644130.5199590.0600222.898588606.475410.70073606.031420.56489604.371717.51825100.3481
GJ-01 040.00072433.493776.926545339.26930.0204160.8197432.3691110.0986821.3471510.5686310.0602471.948813606.67958.172888607.904914.40194612.47511.9359999.05375
GJ-01 050.00106529.706235.673455299.93330.0189160.8204272.8263450.0991311.7345370.6137030.0600252.231504609.31510.56879608.286617.19228604.458113.48851100.8035
GJ-01 060.0021731.66.3319.60130.0197120.8200882.4402730.0989071.4101440.5778630.0601361.991589607.99748.573639608.097714.83925608.471612.1182599.92206
GJ-01 070.00376929.038165.728595289.5010.0197880.8441143.4179730.101451.3594960.3977490.0603463.13597622.90168.468324621.413621.23975615.998719.31754101.1206
GJ-01 080.00376929.262875.70305289.17380.0197220.8464523.3937350.1016611.287540.3793870.0603873.140012624.1388.036027622.721.13279617.478419.3889101.0785
GJ-01 090.0023631.928636.417043325.78540.0196970.8180012.3076150.0986531.1927950.5168950.0601371.97543606.50787.234397606.932514.00566608.518612.0208699.66956
GJ-01 100.00237932.212776.405464324.32350.019750.8302222.467140.1001471.2208150.494830.0601252.143919615.26937.511301613.735515.14171608.080313.03675101.1822
GJ-01 110.00201830.987236.194536314.87910.0196730.8099512.6197440.0976661.3217420.5045310.0601472.26187600.71737.939933602.426415.78203608.862813.7716998.66217
GJ-01 120.00317840.178567.972567404.29390.019720.8282942.6820130.1005131.2750240.4753980.0597672.359557617.41187.872147612.66516.43176595.156614.04306103.7394
GJ-01 130.00498724.328994.896935248.9960.0196670.8102593.2929330.0970411.5100950.4585870.0605572.926264597.04729.015981602.59919.84318623.539818.2464295.75125
GJ-01 140.0041438.871017.703065390.20660.0197410.8297023.0043190.1007721.397890.4652940.0597152.659292618.9298.651947613.446618.42989593.25915.77649104.327
GJ-01 150.0026538.459499.406425385.83710.0243790.8306392.4034510.0996251.6052760.6679040.0604711.788762612.20849.827631613.966814.75639620.457611.0985198.67046
GJ-01 160.00269424.740513.193575253.36550.0126050.8096043.1847280.0981882.3991410.7533270.0598012.094426603.783614.48562602.231719.17945596.394412.49104101.239
GJ-01 170.00246123.414184.962663242.07170.0205010.8130952.1193670.098091.0318490.4868660.060121.851217603.2046.224153604.18912.80498607.885811.2532999.22983
GJ-01 180.00147239.785827.637337397.13090.0192310.8270851.8528780.0997231.1965220.6457640.0601521.414741612.78727.332136611.993511.33949609.05728.616581100.6124
GJ-01 190.00333730.258695.503206301.40320.0182590.8404782.7301540.1011071.5912280.5828340.060292.218499620.89329.879825619.409616.91084613.992113.62141101.124

Appendix B. U-Pb Results of 91500 Reference Material

Spot NumberPbThU 207Pb/1 s206Pb/1 s 207Pb/1 s206Pb/1 s207Pb/1 s207Pb/1 s%
ƒ 206appmppmppmTh/Ub235U[%]238U[%]Rhod206Pbe[%]238Uabs235Uabs206PbabsConcf
91500 010.0099618.7922984.85354246.547540.1042711.8352114.2131460.1763222.7393430.6501890.0754883.2010311046.84828.676761058.14744.58131081.5334.6201296.79323
91500 020.0109888.596215−26.888242.96674−0.625791.9473196.3061790.18742.9058760.4607980.0753645.5967651107.27732.176091097.52369.211781078.23360.34614102.6937
91500 030.007398.0710791.0696139.963610.0267651.8901443.5523540.18212.8494660.8021350.0752812.1212631078.43630.729661077.63338.281321076.00922.82497100.2255
91500 040.0087588.3999286.30269640.960720.1538721.9134715.4876910.1834273.7074880.6756010.0756594.0458971085.66840.2511085.79559.585071086.0543.9404799.96479
91500 050.0210595.955597−7.6819529.2964−0.262211.9420416.9699530.1874655.8281750.8361860.0751343.8226461107.62664.554391095.70476.370031072.09440.98237103.3143
91500 060.0096316.4855146.23597333.275020.1874071.896624.965480.1834213.4765820.700150.0749943.545331085.63837.743111079.90553.622471068.35437.87666101.6179
91500 070.0185275.966631118.01829.740393.9682751.9463186.7505910.1859455.3426960.7914410.0759154.1262661099.37258.736111097.17874.066031092.8345.09306100.5987
91500 080.0144146.5824394.21770331.600790.1334682.0104956.3545890.1932724.7614730.7492970.0754454.2082281139.07654.23681119.05871.111571080.39245.46534105.4318
91500 090.0132717.2618594.19826636.176780.1160491.9175286.1510840.1836033.872280.6295280.0757464.7792551086.6342.077371087.20866.875071088.36552.0157699.84056
91500 100.0190025.9697323.91653629.679380.1319611.9547576.6591290.1867355.457090.819490.0759223.8163021103.66660.228021100.08373.255931093.00341.71229100.9755
91500 110.0026829.44144819.66344.928390.4376521.9226874.8184850.184754.1908150.8697370.0754792.3779961092.8745.800151089.00252.473391081.27525.71267101.0723
91500 120.0259144.62596410.5135721.270850.4942712.1047679.3278570.1996967.7662450.8325860.0764425.1666591173.68991.151581150.367107.30461106.67157.17794106.0558
91500 130.00369311.447718.643855.762880.3343411.9297894.9472990.1845194.5463940.9189650.0758521.9509151091.61749.629211091.46653.998091091.16521.2877100.0414
91500 140.0028310.54622.4990452.069920.4320931.9086283.1155330.1833012.6580260.8531530.0755191.6252531084.98528.839171084.10633.775671082.33917.59075100.2444

References

  1. Corfu, F. A century of U-Pb geochronology: The long quest towards concordance. GSA Bull. 2013, 125, 33–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wetherill, G.W. Discordant uranium-lead ages. Part 2. Discordant ages result from the diffusion of lead and uranium. J. Geophys. Res. 1966, 68, 2957–2965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Allègre, C.J. Methode de discussion geochronologique Concordia generalisee. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1967, 2, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Krogh, T.E. Improved accuracy of U-Pb zircon ages by selecting more concordant fractions using a high gradient magnetic separation technique. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1982, 46, 631–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Feng, R.; Machado, N.; Ludden, J. Lead geochronology of zircon by LaserProbe Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometery (LP-ICPMS). Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1993, 57, 3479–3486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bowring, S.A.; Schmitz, M.D. High precision zircon geochronology and the stratigraphic record. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 2003, 53, 305–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Matzel, J.; Bowring, S.; Miller, R. Time scales of pluton construction at differing crustal levels: Examples from the Mount Stuart and Tenpeak intrusions, North Cascades, Washington. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 2006, 118, 1412–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dodson, M.H. Closure temperature in cooling geochronological and petrological systems. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 1973, 40, 259–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fryer, B.J.; Jackson, S.E.; Longerich, H.P. The application of laser ablation microprobe–inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry (LAM-ICP-MS) to in-situ (U)-Pb geochronology. Chem. Geol. 1993, 109, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gebaur, D.; Grunenfelder, M. U-Th-Pb dating of minerals. In Lectures in Isotope Geology; Jäger, E., Hunziker, J.C., Eds.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany; New York, NY, USA, 1979; pp. 105–131. [Google Scholar]
  11. Machado, N.; Gauthier, G. Determination of 207Pb/206Pb ages on zircon and monazite by laser-ablation ICPMS and application to study sedimentary provenance and metamorphism in southeastern Brazil. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1996, 60, 5063–5073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Košler, J.; Fonneland, H.; Sylvester, P.; Tubrett, M.; Pedersen, R.-B. U-Pb dating of detrital zircons for sediment provenance studies—A comparison of laser ablation ICP-MSand SIMS techniques. Chem. Geol. 2002, 182, 605–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Horn, I.; Rudnick, R.L.; McDonough, W.F. Precise elemental and isotope ratio determination by simultaneous solution nebulization and laser ablationICP-MS: Application to U-Pb geochronology. Chem. Geol. 2000, 164, 281–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jackson, S.E.; Pearson, N.J.; Griffin, W.L.; Belousova, E.A. The application of laser ablation–inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry to in situ U-Pb zircon geochronology. Chem. Geol. 2004, 211, 47–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gehrels, G.E.; Valencia, V.A.; Ruiz, J. Enhanced precision, accuracy, efficiency, and spatial resolution of U-Pb ages by laser ablation–multi-collector–inductively of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 2008, 24, 1355–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cottle, J.M.; Horstwood, M.S.A.; Parrish, R.R. A new approach to single shot laser ablation analysis and its application to in situ Pb/U geochronology: Coupled plasma–mass spectrometry. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 2009, 9, Q03017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ahrens, L.H. Implications of the Rhodesia age pattern. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1955, 8, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wetherill, G.W. Discordant Uranium-Lead ages, Part I. Am. Geophys. Union Trans. 1956, 37, 320–326. [Google Scholar]
  19. Pidgeon, R.T.; Nemchin, A.A.; Hitchen, G.J. Internal structures of zircons from Archean granites from the Darling Range batholith: Implications for zircon stability and the interpretation of zircon U-Pb ages. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 1998, 132, 288–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Connelly, J.N. Degree of preservation of igneous zonation in zircon as a signpost for concordancy in U-Pb geochronology. Chem. Geol. 2001, 172, 25–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. McFarlane, C.R.M.; Connelly, J.N.; Carlson, W.D. Intracrystalline redistribution of Pb in zircon during high-temperature metamorphism. Chem. Geol. 2005, 217, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Reddy, S.M.; Timms, N.E.; Trimby, P.W.; Kinny, P.D.; Buchan, C.; Blake, K. Crystal-plastic deformation of zircon: A defect in the assumption of chemical robustness. Geology 2006, 34, 257–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ludwig, K.R. ISOPLOT–A Plotting and Regression Program for Radiogenic Isotope Data. Version 2.70; Special Publication No. 1a; Berkeley Geochronology Center: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2000; Volume 91–445, 42p. [Google Scholar]
  24. Martins, J.P.; Lemos, F.R. Pegmatitos do Complexo Alcalino de Peixe ñ Goias. Master’s Thesis, Universidade Federal do Para, Belém, Brazil, 1981; 101p. [Google Scholar]
  25. Dardenne, M.A. The Brasília fold belt. In Tectonic Evolution of South America; Cordani, U.G., Milani, E.J., Filho, A.T., Campos, D.A., Eds.; SBG: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2000; pp. 231–263. [Google Scholar]
  26. Pimentel, M.M.; Fuck, R.A.; Jost, H.; Ferreira Filho, C.F.; Araújo, S.M. The basament of the Brasilia Fold Belt and the Goiás magmatic arc. In Tectonic Evolution of South America; Cordani, U.G., Thomas Filho, A., Campos, D.A., Eds.; SBG: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2000; pp. 195–229. [Google Scholar]
  27. Pimentel, M.M.; Rodrigues, J.B.; Della Giustina, M.E.S.; Junges, S.; Matteini, M.; Armstrong, R. The tectonic evolution of the Neoproterozoic Brasília belt, central Brazil, based on SHRIMP and LA-ICPMS U-Pb sedimentary provenance data—A review. J. S. Am. Earth Sci. 2011, 3, 345–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dalziel, I.W.D. Late Proterozoic-Paleozoic geography and tectonics: Review, hypothesis, environmental speculation. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 1997, 109, 16–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Trompete, R. Geology of Western Gondwana (2000–500 Ma); Balkema, A.A., Ed.; CRC Press: Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 1994; 350p. [Google Scholar]
  30. Marini, O.J.; Fuck, R.A.; Danni, J.C.M.; Dardene, M.A.; Lougguércio, R.O.; Ramalho, R. As faixas de dobramentos Brasília, Uruaçu e Paraguai-Araguaia e o Maciço Mediano de Goiás. In Geologia do Brasil; Schobbenhaus, C., Campos, D.A., Derze, G.R., Asmus, H.E., Eds.; DNPM: Brasília, Brazil, 1984; pp. 251–303. [Google Scholar]
  31. Bartrbosa, O.; Baptista, M.B.; Braun, P.G.; Dyer, R.E.; Costa, L.E. Geologia e Reeursos Minerais do Projeto Brasilia; Relatorio Interno; PROSPEC-DNPM: Brasília, Brazil, 1969; 225p. [Google Scholar]
  32. Lemos, R.L. Petrologia do Maciço Alcalino de Peixe em Goias. Master’s Thesis, Universidade Federal do Para, Belém, Brazil, 1983; 169p. [Google Scholar]
  33. Rossi, P.; Andrade, G.F.; Gaspar, J.C. The Peixe (Tocantis, Brazil) Mesoproterozoic corundum-bearing syenite pegmatite complex: Age, considerations on its origin and regional significance. In Congresso Brasileiro de Geologia, Anais, 39; SBG: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 1996; Volume 6, pp. 426–428. [Google Scholar]
  34. Queiroz, H.; Viana, R.R.; Battilani, G.A.; Oliveira, L.L.; Borges GM e Guerra, D.L. Occurrence of Complex Pegmatites in the South of Tocantins State, Brazil; Asociación Geológica Argentina: Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2011; Volume 14, pp. 157–159. [Google Scholar]
  35. Kitajima, L.F.W.; Ruiz, J.; Gehrels, G.; Gaspar, J.C. Uranium-lead ages of zircon megacrysts and zircon included in corundum from Peixe Alkaline Complex (Brazil). In Proceedings of the III South American Symposium on Isotope Geology, Pucon, Chile, 21–24 October 2001. Extended Abstracts on CD-ROM. [Google Scholar]
  36. Navarro, G.R.B.; Zanardo, A.; Simões, L.S.A. Rochas metamáficas associadas ao Arco Magmático de Goiás na região de Pontalina-GO. Rev. Bras. Geociências 2007, 37, 18–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Pimentel, M.M.; Fuck, R.A.; Alvarenga, C.J.S. Post-Brasiliano (Pan-African) high-K granitic magmatism in Central Brazil: The role of Late Precambrian-early Palaeozoic extension. Precambrian Res. 1996, 80, 217–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Marques, G.C. Geologia dos Grupos Araí e Serra da Mesa e Seu Embasamento no sul de Tocantins. Master’s Dissertation, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Brazil, 2009; 120p. [Google Scholar]
  39. Polo, H.J.O.; Diener, F.S. Carta Geológica: Folha Mata Azul SD.22-X-DII; Projeto Noroeste de Goiás; CPRM: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  40. Pereira, A.B. Caracterização dos Granitos e Pegmatitos Peraluminosos, Mineralizados em Sn and Ta, de Monte Alegre de Goiás. 2001. 57f. Master’s Dissertation, Instituto de Geociências, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Brazil, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  41. Griffin, W.L.; Belousova, E.A.; Walters, S.G.; O’Reilly, S.Y. Archaean and Proterozoic crustal evolution in the Eastern Succession of the Mt Isa district, Australia: U–Pb and Hf-isotope studies of detrital zircons. Austr. J. Earth Sci. 2006, 53, 125–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Elhlou, S.; Belousova, E.; Griffin, W.L.; Pearson, N.J.; O’reilly, S.Y. Trace element and isotopic composition of GJ-red zircon reference material by laser ablation. Geochmica Cosmochim. Acta 2006, 70, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Alves, M.I.; Almeida, B.S.; Cardoso, L.M.C.; Santos, A.C.; Appi CBertotti, A.L.; Chemale, F.; Tavares, A.D., Jr.; Martons, M.V.A.; Geraldes, M.C. Isotopic Composition of Lu, Hf, and Yb in GJ-1, 91500 and Mud Tank reference materials measured by LA-ICP-MS: Application of the Lu-Hf geochronology in zircon. J. Sediment. Environ. 2019, 4, 220–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Reinhardt, F.; Laux, J.; Oliveira, C.; Junges, S. The Santa Terezinha Sequence, Goias Magmatic arc, Central Brazil: Constraints from U-Pb and Sm-Nd Data. In Proceedings of the South American Symposium on Isotope Geology, Punta Del Este, Uruguay, 24–27 April 2006. [Google Scholar]
  45. Nilson, A.A.; Botelho, N.F.; Ferreira Filho, C.F. Rifteamento crustal Meso-proterozoico no centro de Goias. In Congresso Brasileiro de Geologia, 38, Balneario Camboriu, Anais; SBG: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 1994; pp. 258–259. [Google Scholar]
  46. Pimentel, M.M.; Heaman, L.; Fuck, R.A.; Marini, O.J. U-Pb zircon geochronology of Precambrian tinbearing continental-type acid magmatism in central Brazil. Precambrian Res. 1991, 52, 321–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Rämö, O.T.; Haapala, I. One hundred years of rapakivi granite. Mineral. Petrol. 1995, 52, 129–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Cid, J.P.; Bitencourt, M.F.; Nardi, L.V.S.; Conceição, H.; Bonin, B.; Lafon, J.M. Paleoproterozoic late-orogenic and anorogenic alkaline granitic magmatism from northeast Brazil. Precambrian Res. 2000, 104, 47–75. [Google Scholar]
  49. Valentin, E.; Botelho, N.F.; Dantas, E.L. Monte Santo suite, an example of Ediacaran-Cambrian deformed alkaline rocks in the Araguaia Belt, Central Brazil. Implications for Western Gondwana evolution. Lithos 2020, 366, 105552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Gondwana assembly speculation. The collision period among each continental fragment is diachronic during the Gondwana amalgamation. Cratonic areas are AA—Arequipa-Antofala; AMZ—Amazonia; WAF—West Africa; RAP—Rio Apa; RDP—Rio de La Plata; PP–Papanapanema; SF—São Francisco; CNG—Congo; KHR—Kalahari. Modified from [28,29]. Tucavaca, Paraguay and Araguaia are Neoproterozoic mobile belts.
Figure 1. Gondwana assembly speculation. The collision period among each continental fragment is diachronic during the Gondwana amalgamation. Cratonic areas are AA—Arequipa-Antofala; AMZ—Amazonia; WAF—West Africa; RAP—Rio Apa; RDP—Rio de La Plata; PP–Papanapanema; SF—São Francisco; CNG—Congo; KHR—Kalahari. Modified from [28,29]. Tucavaca, Paraguay and Araguaia are Neoproterozoic mobile belts.
Minerals 15 00274 g001
Figure 2. Geological context of the Peixe Alkaline Suite, in the context of the Brasilia Belt, in the state of Tocantins. Figure (A) (gamma spectrometry) highlights the alkaline intrusion and shows the area of gem exploration beyond the limits of the intrusion (in the host rocks). In (B), the modified geological map from [30] is on the same scale as that observed in (A). Black rectangle is the location of Figure 4.
Figure 2. Geological context of the Peixe Alkaline Suite, in the context of the Brasilia Belt, in the state of Tocantins. Figure (A) (gamma spectrometry) highlights the alkaline intrusion and shows the area of gem exploration beyond the limits of the intrusion (in the host rocks). In (B), the modified geological map from [30] is on the same scale as that observed in (A). Black rectangle is the location of Figure 4.
Minerals 15 00274 g002
Figure 3. (A) Syenogranite sample of Peixe intrusion. (B) Nepheline syenite.
Figure 3. (A) Syenogranite sample of Peixe intrusion. (B) Nepheline syenite.
Minerals 15 00274 g003
Figure 4. Local geological context of the Alkaline Peixe Suite in the region of economic exploitation through mining. Modified from [39,40].
Figure 4. Local geological context of the Alkaline Peixe Suite in the region of economic exploitation through mining. Modified from [39,40].
Minerals 15 00274 g004
Figure 5. Cathodoluminescense (CL) image of the studied zircon grain. The rectangles represent details in Figure 6 (A, B, C, and D) and Figure 7 (E, F, G, and H). Target 1 and 2 present craters where the U-Pb and Lu-Hf analyses were carried out.
Figure 5. Cathodoluminescense (CL) image of the studied zircon grain. The rectangles represent details in Figure 6 (A, B, C, and D) and Figure 7 (E, F, G, and H). Target 1 and 2 present craters where the U-Pb and Lu-Hf analyses were carried out.
Minerals 15 00274 g005
Figure 6. (A) Concordia diagram of GJ-1 (reference material) U-Pb isotopic results obtained in the laboratory during the analysis of unknown samples reported here. (B) Concordia diagram of 91500 (reference material).
Figure 6. (A) Concordia diagram of GJ-1 (reference material) U-Pb isotopic results obtained in the laboratory during the analysis of unknown samples reported here. (B) Concordia diagram of 91500 (reference material).
Minerals 15 00274 g006
Figure 7. CL images of zircon grain showing textural complexity. See details in the text. Dash lines define the limit of metamorphic solution flux. Arrows are the direction of the metamorphic solutions. (A) Microlenses may represent new cycles of intrusion within the grain; (B) Sub-horizontal lenses display a cutting relationship; (C) Series of sub-parallel layers with variations in shades of light gray and dark gray material; (D) A relict portion of dark gray zircon surrounded by a lighter gray zircon portion in the upper part and light-toned areas that show growth over the relict portion in the lower part.
Figure 7. CL images of zircon grain showing textural complexity. See details in the text. Dash lines define the limit of metamorphic solution flux. Arrows are the direction of the metamorphic solutions. (A) Microlenses may represent new cycles of intrusion within the grain; (B) Sub-horizontal lenses display a cutting relationship; (C) Series of sub-parallel layers with variations in shades of light gray and dark gray material; (D) A relict portion of dark gray zircon surrounded by a lighter gray zircon portion in the upper part and light-toned areas that show growth over the relict portion in the lower part.
Minerals 15 00274 g007
Figure 8. CL images of zircon grain showing textural complexity. See details in the text. Dash lines define the limit of metamorphic solution flux. Arrows are the direction of the metamorphic solutions. (A) Lighter gray zircon lenses with curvilinear surfaces that cut through the darker areas; (B) Lighter gray zircon that intersects darker gray portions at an angle; (C) Zones display a potentially magmatic zoning pattern and also show layers of dark gray zircon, probably of magmatic origin, cut by layers of lighter tones at an angle, suggesting a younger age for the lighter portion; (D) Complex pattern characterized by amoeboid shapes of light gray zircon cutting through darker gray zircon.
Figure 8. CL images of zircon grain showing textural complexity. See details in the text. Dash lines define the limit of metamorphic solution flux. Arrows are the direction of the metamorphic solutions. (A) Lighter gray zircon lenses with curvilinear surfaces that cut through the darker areas; (B) Lighter gray zircon that intersects darker gray portions at an angle; (C) Zones display a potentially magmatic zoning pattern and also show layers of dark gray zircon, probably of magmatic origin, cut by layers of lighter tones at an angle, suggesting a younger age for the lighter portion; (D) Complex pattern characterized by amoeboid shapes of light gray zircon cutting through darker gray zircon.
Minerals 15 00274 g008
Figure 9. Concordia diagrams for the U-Pb results were obtained for two distinct areas of the analyzed grains: (A) Gray areas; (B) White areas.
Figure 9. Concordia diagrams for the U-Pb results were obtained for two distinct areas of the analyzed grains: (A) Gray areas; (B) White areas.
Minerals 15 00274 g009
Figure 10. Lu-Hf results obtained on zircon grains from the Peixe Suite: (A) ƐHf(t) values versus Age (Ma); (B) 176Hf/177Hf versus Age (Ma).
Figure 10. Lu-Hf results obtained on zircon grains from the Peixe Suite: (A) ƐHf(t) values versus Age (Ma); (B) 176Hf/177Hf versus Age (Ma).
Minerals 15 00274 g010
Figure 11. CL image of craters in two different areas of the zircon grain. See locations in Figure 5. Target 1 is comprised of area A; Target 2 is comprised of area B.
Figure 11. CL image of craters in two different areas of the zircon grain. See locations in Figure 5. Target 1 is comprised of area A; Target 2 is comprised of area B.
Minerals 15 00274 g011
Table 1. U-Pb results of Peixe zircon gray area. Rho: relation between 207Pb/235U error and 206Pb/238U (define the ellipsis inclination). Conc.: Concordance between 207Pb/235U and 206Pb/238U ages. The f206: relation between common lead and radiogenic lead (based on 204Pb). Th/U: ratio between Th and U concentration.
Table 1. U-Pb results of Peixe zircon gray area. Rho: relation between 207Pb/235U error and 206Pb/238U (define the ellipsis inclination). Conc.: Concordance between 207Pb/235U and 206Pb/238U ages. The f206: relation between common lead and radiogenic lead (based on 204Pb). Th/U: ratio between Th and U concentration.
Peixe Zircon Gray Area Isotope Ratios Age (Ma) Ages (Ma) Ages (Ma)
Spot Number PbThU 207Pb/1 s 206Pb/1 s 207Pb/1 s 206Pb/1 s 207Pb/1 s 207Pb/1 s %
ƒ 206appmppmppmTh/Ub235U [%]238U[%]Rho206P[%]238Uabs235Uabs206PbabsConcordance
PEIXE 01 010.0012812.9919.98130.810.150.76587420.09419920.880.0589671580.320411577.393413565.89196103
PEIXE 01 020.0017969.6811.4799.170.120.76813720.09479720.850.0587681583.847311578.693513558.51197105
PEIXE 01 030.0022959.419.5197.130.100.76769120.09408320.820.059181579.638812578.437214573.72078101
PEIXE 01 040.00152213.5920.06138.120.150.77003420.09440120.830.0591611581.510911579.782713573.01757101
PEIXE 01 050.00113413.5718.08138.520.130.7663820.09369720.830.0593221577.365811577.684214578.93668100
PEIXE 01 060.00120412.4916.35127.610.130.77107320.09422620.830.059351580.480611580.378114579.97688100
PEIXE 01 070.0015510.8914.15111.440.130.76831920.09394520.820.0593151578.826911578.798114578.68498100
PEIXE 01 080.00120211.0514.41113.360.130.76530220.09353420.820.0593421576.404911577.064613579.6629899
PEIXE 01 090.0021089.9712.98102.250.130.76698220.09386720.780.0592611578.364811578.030314576.71549100
PEIXE 02 010.0023268.177.0583.150.080.79650870.09805460.950.0589142602.996339594.856740563.937311107
PEIXE 02 020.0019268.287.1385.010.080.78909770.09678470.960.0591322595.535339590.659640571.97110104
PEIXE 02 030.0024268.587.2288.010.080.79270270.09715860.960.0591742597.733739592.703440573.493611104
PEIXE 02 040.0015438.757.1589.920.080.79422170.09743560.960.0591192599.359939593.563340571.468811105
PEIXE 02 050.0017969.207.7294.940.080.78914970.09638770.970.059382593.19839590.68940581.061510102
PEIXE 02 060.002499.528.5897.830.090.79113470.09619970.960.0596462592.095239591.81540590.741112100
PEIXE 02 070.0021269.878.88101.900.090.78593570.09628770.960.05922592.611439588.863240574.442411103
PEIXE 02 080.0023269.848.84101.940.090.78353270.09556170.960.0594672588.341839587.49640584.229411101
PEIXE 02 090.0026259.408.3596.720.090.79448870.09697260.960.0594212596.638239593.714440582.557711102
PEIXE 03 010.0015818.378.2985.090.100.77955650.0967640.890.0584322595.394424585.230227545.990911109
PEIXE 03 020.0028299.039.4697.010.100.75452550.0921540.920.0593852568.237325570.846527581.25161198
PEIXE 04 010.0021089.649.24100.220.090.835236430.09469990.220.06396842583.270354616.5134263740.563230879
PEIXE 04 020.0023268.928.9594.340.090.822243430.09325190.220.06395142574.734454609.2991260740.00530878
PEIXE 04 030.0019268.919.2495.470.100.798328440.0930390.210.06223843573.430754595.8847261682.308129284
PEIXE 04 040.0028298.729.3294.030.100.819438420.09229190.220.06439641569.071554607.7351258754.650731275
PEIXE 04 050.0023269.029.2593.580.100.844645430.09566390.210.06403742588.942554621.706265742.84330979
PEIXE 04 060.00282913.1314.30136.380.100.842121430.09599990.210.06362242590.919354620.3153266729.082130581
PEIXE 04 070.00232612.6213.31133.960.100.799636440.09432190.210.06148743581.040254596.6233264656.316528489
PEIXE 04 080.0028299.259.5097.840.100.818945440.09500190.220.06252143585.047355607.4594265691.969329585
PEIXE 04 090.00229511.7811.97124.280.100.820754430.09382890.220.06344242578.139554608.469262723.082330480
Peixe zircon white area Isotope ratios Age (Ma) Ages (Ma)Ages (Ma)
Spot number PbThU 207Pb/1 s206Pb/1 s 207Pb/1 s206Pb/1 s207Pb/1 s207Pb/1 s%
ƒ 206ppmppmppmTh/U235U[%]238U[%]Rho206[%]238Uabs235Uabs206PbabsConcordance
Peixe zircon grain Area B
PEIXE110_0010.12032121.726.1440.0500.3050.7290630.0880120.610.060082543.75729606.457549556.00141298
PEIXE110_0040.00841821.445.6240.0430.2440.72192430.0882820.610.059312545.35689578.494148551.80211299
PEIXE110_0050.06199521.735.7100.0410.2350.72421530.0881120.610.0596132544.34979589.558348553.15241298
PEIXE110_0050.01538819.606.1080.0530.3210.72466630.0888720.610.059142548.85079572.253749553.41761299
PEIXE110_0010.03766818.535.1800.0660.3390.72891130.0899920.620.0587462555.4789557.699348555.913912100
PEIXE110_0020.04161119.885.6120.0580.3260.71527730.0891220.620.058212550.33069537.674947547.874712100
PEIXE110_0030.14765716.884.7280.0700.3330.726430.0898220.620.0586552554.47259554.297149554.438112100
PEIXE110_0040.13756120.095.7280.0540.3070.71482730.0882420.620.0587542545.11989557.976648547.608512100
PEIXE110_0050.0731220.325.7810.0510.2920.7173830.0884120.630.058852546.12689561.551447549.11891299
PEIXE110_0020.01302324.977.1810.0260.1840.72098730.0865620.620.060412535.16039618.29247551.24931297
PEIXE110_0040.00113825.847.4200.0270.1970.72613430.0866920.610.060752535.93159630.394148554.28141297
Table 2. Lu-Hf results of Peixe zircon gray (A) and white (B) area. eHf(0): epsilon value for today. eHf(t): epsilon value for metamorphic age.
Table 2. Lu-Hf results of Peixe zircon gray (A) and white (B) area. eHf(0): epsilon value for today. eHf(t): epsilon value for metamorphic age.
Sample (Present Day Ratios) ChurDMSample Initial Ratios
NameU/Pb Age (Ma)±2 s176Hf/177Hf±2SE176Lu/177Hf±2SE176Hf/177Hf (t)176Hf/177Hf (t)176Hf/177Hf (t)eHf(0)eHf(t)±2SET DM Crustal
White Area
PEIXE_2058030.282040.0005490.0013269.99 × 10−60.2823230.2827160.282021−26.357−10.67020.1099012.128
PEIXE_2158030.2820040.00030.0013671.16 × 10−50.2823230.2827160.281985−27.6227−11.95770.1244162.200
PEIXE_2258030.2820540.0002310.0013531.95 × 10−50.2823230.2827160.282036−25.8391−10.16460.1631782.100
PEIXE_2358030.2819830.0001450.0011991.95 × 10−50.2823230.2827160.281966−28.3757−12.630.2223122.238
PEIXE_2458030.2819828.29 × 10−50.0011871.57 × 10−50.2823230.2827160.281966−28.388−12.63640.1811892.238
PEIXE_2558030.2819766.64 × 10−50.0011751.16 × 10−50.2823230.2827160.28196−28.6133−12.85620.1401782.251
PEIXE_2658030.2819565.27 × 10−50.001261.92 × 10−50.2823230.2827160.281939−29.3126−13.59810.2210172.292
PEIXE_2758030.2819554.68 × 10−50.0012611.68 × 10−50.2823230.2827160.281937−29.3584−13.64460.1954142.295
PEIXE_2858030.2819314.46 × 10−50.001248.87 × 10−70.2823230.2827160.281914−30.209−14.48630.0245232.342
PEIXE_2958030.2819624.45 × 10−50.0011748.67 × 10−60.2823230.2827160.281946−29.0887−13.3320.1115542.277
PEIXE_3058030.2824959.12 × 10−58.84 × 10−57.1 × 10−70.2823230.2827160.282494−10.23956.0770720.0557041.182
915001065100.2823140.0001040.0002021.57 × 10−60.282110.2824710.28231−16.64187.0934830.0616961.391
Gray areaU/Pb Sample (Present Day Ratios) ChurDMSample Initial Ratios Crustal
SampleAge (Ma)±2s 176Hf/177Hf±2 SE176Lu/177Hf±2SE176Hf/177Hf (t)176Hf/177Hf (t)176Hf/177Hf (t)eHf(0)eHf(t)±2SEresidence
7054840.2820385.55 × 10−50.0008910.0001160.2824290.2828390.282029−26.4064−14.18021.9478361793.539
8054840.2820125.76 × 10−50.0009210.0001150.2824290.2828390.282002−27.3274−15.11351.9909841850.877
9054840.2820617.24 × 10−50.000999.96 × 10−50.2824290.2828390.282051−25.5859−13.39581.4470431745.301
10054840.2819926.73 × 10−50.0009520.0001320.2824290.2828390.281982−28.0286−15.82742.3121221894.694
11054840.2819827.62 × 10−50.0008990.0001420.2824290.2828390.281973−28.388−16.16732.6667631915.546
12054840.2820218.41 × 10−50.0008520.0001470.2824290.2828390.282012−27.011−14.77092.6614781829.839
13054840.2819187.45 × 10−50.0008590.000140.2824290.2828390.281909−30.6691−18.43633.151242054.514
14054840.282087.65 × 10−50.0009780.0001130.2824290.2828390.28207−24.9139−12.71851.5621881703.618
15054840.2819617.55 × 10−50.0009520.0001160.2824290.2828390.281951−29.1473−16.94742.1907491963.362
16054840.2820397.96 × 10−50.0010537.65 × 10−50.2824290.2828390.282028−26.363−14.19751.1363431794.605
MUD TANK73240.282464.32 × 10−59.65 × 10−53.5 × 10−70.2823230.2827160.282458−11.50664.8039880.044398577.1016
91500106540.2823096.93 × 10−50.0002456.06 × 10−70.282110.2824710.282304−16.84776.8564930.044412374.8383
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Coelho, M.H.; Romero, L.F.; Martins, M.V.A.; Holanda, W.; Salomão, M.; Potratz, G.L.; Tavares, A.D.; Geraldes, M.C. U-Pb and Lu-Hf Record of Two Metamorphic Events from the Peixe Alkaline Suite, Brasilia Belt: Textural and Isotopic Complexity in Zircon. Minerals 2025, 15, 274. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15030274

AMA Style

Coelho MH, Romero LF, Martins MVA, Holanda W, Salomão M, Potratz GL, Tavares AD, Geraldes MC. U-Pb and Lu-Hf Record of Two Metamorphic Events from the Peixe Alkaline Suite, Brasilia Belt: Textural and Isotopic Complexity in Zircon. Minerals. 2025; 15(3):274. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15030274

Chicago/Turabian Style

Coelho, Marco Helenio, Luís Felipe Romero, Maria Virginia Alves Martins, Werlem Holanda, Marcelo Salomão, Guilherme Loriato Potratz, Armando Dias Tavares, and Mauro Cesar Geraldes. 2025. "U-Pb and Lu-Hf Record of Two Metamorphic Events from the Peixe Alkaline Suite, Brasilia Belt: Textural and Isotopic Complexity in Zircon" Minerals 15, no. 3: 274. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15030274

APA Style

Coelho, M. H., Romero, L. F., Martins, M. V. A., Holanda, W., Salomão, M., Potratz, G. L., Tavares, A. D., & Geraldes, M. C. (2025). U-Pb and Lu-Hf Record of Two Metamorphic Events from the Peixe Alkaline Suite, Brasilia Belt: Textural and Isotopic Complexity in Zircon. Minerals, 15(3), 274. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15030274

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop